By Agendas: Varro Vooglaid

Total Agendas: 229

Fully Profiled: 229

All Categories Political Position Topic Expertise Rhetorical Style Activity Patterns Opposition Stance Collaboration Style Regional Focus Economic Views Social Issues Legislative Focus
2025-10-15
First Reading of the Draft Act Amending the Law on the Election of the President of the Republic (684 SE)

The 15th Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting

The main targets of criticism are the initiators of the draft legislation and the political system, which seeks to maintain power through "party consensus," ignoring the will of the people and constitutional principles. The criticism is both procedural and political, focusing on democratic shortcomings and the lack of transparency in the electoral system. Specific opposition was voiced regarding the stance of colleague Lauri Hussar on the issue of direct presidential elections. The demand to stop "duping the public" and introduce radical democratic changes demonstrates an uncompromising approach.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-10-15
Discussion of the state issue of significant national importance initiated by the Committee on European Union Affairs: "Estonia's Choices and Opportunities in the European Union's 2028–2034 Long-Term Budget"

The 15th Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting

Criticism is directed at the European Union’s aggressive policy of debt accumulation, which is deemed unacceptable without a clear repayment plan. Furthermore, a challenge is being issued to the Government of the Republic of Estonia, demanding that they formulate and defend a strategic stance.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-10-15
On the topic of ERM

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Information Hour

The main opponent is the Minister of Culture, who is sharply criticized for avoiding responsibility and washing their hands clean regarding the scandals in cultural institutions. The criticism is intense and value-based, accusing the minister of giving free rein to processes that are breaking down the sense of national cohesion. Simultaneously, the speaker defends the right of their colleague, Martin Helme, to raise critical questions.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-10-08
Third reading of the Draft Act supplementing the Police and Border Guard Act (670 SE)

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The confrontation is intense and uncompromising, leveling criticism at both procedural errors (illegal activity) and conceptual directions (the loss of privacy). The primary adversaries are the PPA and the Ministry of the Interior, who stand accused of evading responsibility for the illegal actions. The speaker dismisses claims that a compromise was reached, stating that the PPA ultimately got everything it desired.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-10-08
Population crisis

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Information Hour

The main criticism is directed at the government and the Reform Party, accusing them of ignoring the demographic crisis and the disproportionate allocation of resources. The criticism is intense and focuses on specific political choices, such as the elimination of the position of Minister of Population, as well as earlier tax changes and the car tax that penalize families.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-10-07
First Reading of the 2026 State Budget Bill (737 SE)

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The main confrontation is with the government and the Minister of Finance over fiscal policy, particularly concerning the deepening of the deficit and uncontrolled spending. The speaker also criticizes personal attacks by the coalition (against Peeter Raudsepp) and the opposing side's (Toomas Kivimägi) accusations that the opposition is neglecting national defense expenditures.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-24
First reading of the draft resolution (705 OE) of the Riigikogu, "The use of the Defence Forces in fulfilling Estonia's international obligations in a North Atlantic Treaty Organization or member state, European Union, or United Nations-led international military operation involving the initial contribution thereto."

Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.

The main confrontation is directed at the government, to whom the delegation of Parliament's decision-making power is sought, and at the parliamentary majority, which continues this practice that is contrary to the constitution. The criticism is severe, based exclusively on the violation of the boundaries of constitutionality and competence. A compromise regarding support for the draft bill is ruled out due to the oath of office, as it would be in conflict with the constitution.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-24
Second reading of the draft law amending the Police and Border Guard Act (670 SE)

Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.

Strong opposition is directed at the Police and Border Guard Board (PPA), which is criticized for illegal activity, dishonest conduct, and a lack of accountability. Political opponents (e.g., colleagues Hanimägi and Jufereva-Skuratovski) have been criticized for setting the wrong priorities by supporting the movement toward a surveillance society. The criticism is primarily procedural and value-based, emphasizing that the PPA acted contrary to "good faith."
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-24
First reading of the draft resolution of the Riigikogu "Proposal to the Republic of Estonia's Government to abandon the implementation of the Rail Baltic project in Estonia and to withdraw from all international agreements related to the project" (650 OE)

Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.

The opposition is directed at those who favor the continuation of Rail Baltic, using the large expenditures already made (the so-called sunk cost) as their argument. The criticism is aimed at the political and economic justifications.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-24
State finances

15th Estonian Parliament, 6th sitting, press briefing

Intense opposition is directed at the government, which is accused of breaking core promises (tax increases and moving away from fiscal balance). The criticism is political and centers on the loss of public trust, while also dismissing claims that the war in Ukraine represents a new circumstance justifying the retraction of those commitments.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-23
Draft law amending the Act on Population Status Proceedings, the Population Register Act, and the State Duty Act (687 SE) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 6th session, plenary session

Criticism is aimed at those responsible for the previous situation, who allowed the "absurd situation" to persist for a long time. Regarding the current draft, the criticism focuses on the overly broad discretion granted to officials, which constitutes procedural and policy-based criticism.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-22
Inquiry Regarding the Bringing of Swedish Prisoners to Estonia (No. 792)

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session

The opposition is aimed at the government's plan, criticizing its assumptions regarding job preservation and crisis preparedness. The criticism is policy-based, emphasizing the security risks that arise when the prison is filled with foreign inmates.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-22
Inquiry regarding a naval operation (no. 784) that failed and ended with the risk of military confrontation.

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session

The main adversary is the prime minister and the government, who are being criticized both procedurally (for labeling criticism as propaganda) and substantively (for carrying out inadequate operations). The criticism is highly intense, including the direct accusation that the prime minister "lied" about the plans to halt the operation. Compromise is ruled out, as complete honesty and accountability are being demanded.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-17
Re-examination of the Act Amending the Act Preventing Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing and the Act on International Sanctions (640 UA), which was not announced by the President of the Republic

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting.

The confrontation is directed against the leaders of the Riigikogu majority, the Finance Committee, and the Constitutional Committee, who are criticized for lacking basic competence and ignoring warnings. The criticism is intense, primarily procedural and ideological, accusing the opponents of deliberately violating the constitution and supporting totalitarian initiatives. He/She rejects Maris Lauri's stance that the adoption of unconstitutional laws constitutes "normal" democratic practice.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-17
Re-examination of the Act Amending the Act on Churches and Religious Communities (570 UA) Not Proclaimed by the President of the Republic

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting.

The main opposition is directed at the draft bill restricting religious freedom, and at the legal stance of the President's legal advisor, Hent-Raul Kalmo, that the constitution permits the restriction of religious freedom on security grounds. The opposition is intense and legally justified, focusing on the conflict between policy and the constitution. The criticism is aimed at the procedure and the substance, not at individuals.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-17
In light of the security drone incident and related questions

Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, press briefing.

The primary objection is aimed at the government representative, who fails to provide substantive answers to the questions posed, but instead speaks generally about the causes and effects of the war. The criticism is both procedural and substantive, demanding specific information regarding the flight trajectory and permits for the use of airspace. Furthermore, the speaker criticizes his colleague Peeter Ernits for interrupting him while he was posing the question.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-16
The Chancellor of Justice's report on the conformity of legislative acts with the Constitution and the performance of other duties assigned to the Chancellor by law.

Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.

The main criticism is aimed at the majority of Riigikogu members, who are considered unqualified to carry out the duty of ensuring constitutionality. The criticism is procedural and focuses on institutional capacity (a lack of preparation), rather than specific political opponents or policies. The intensity of the critique is moderate, presented more as a concern and a question.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-15
An inquiry regarding the hindrance of development in the defence industry (no 783)

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting

The main criticism is directed at the administrative area of the Ministry of Defense and the official responsible for answering the inquiry. The criticism is procedural, focusing on poor work organization, confusion regarding the use of funds, and the avoidance of accountability. The solution proposed by the opposition (hiring additional staff) is considered insufficient and dismissive of responsibility.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-11
Draft law amending the Holiday and Commemoration Day Act (636 SE) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session

Insufficient information
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-10
A written request for a vote of no confidence in Social Minister Karmen Joller, submitted by 21 members of the Riigikogu.

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session

The main opponent is Minister of Social Affairs Karmen Joller, who is being intensely criticized both for her political actions and her personal integrity. The attacks center on accusations of promoting pseudoscience (or "woo-woo"), spreading disinformation, and supporting a dictatorial agenda, which allegedly led to the loss of careers for employees in law enforcement structures. Criticism is also aimed at the minister’s alleged hypocrisy when she berates other "spreaders of pseudoscience."
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-09
Draft law amending the Cooperative Savings and Loan Societies Act and, in connection therewith, amending other laws (671 SE) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session.

The opposition is directed at the proponents of the bill and the commission, criticizing the disproportionality of the measure they selected (the prohibition of the activity). The criticism is intense and focuses on the fact that the chosen solution infringes upon constitutional rights more than is necessary.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-09
The Minister of Defence's 2025 presentation on the implementation of the state's long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035"

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session.

The primary confrontation is with the Minister of Defence and the ministry's leadership, who are being criticized for ignoring the audit results and refusing to take responsibility. The criticism is intense and demands personal resignation, which rules out any compromise on this administrative management issue. Additionally, the session chair is criticized for failing to compel the minister to answer specific questions.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-04
Chair implementation

15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu

The main opponents are the government coalition and the Riigikogu Board, who are criticized both for political decisions (tax increases, abortion funding) and for systematic violations of procedural rules. The Board is accused of restricting the rights of opposition members and arbitrarily interpreting the House Rules and Rules of Procedure Act. The speaker rejects the accusations of obstruction, emphasizing the merit and legality of their actions.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-18
Draft law amending the Churches and Religious Communities Act (570 UA) - Third Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The main opponent is Jaanus Karilaid, who is accused of lacking substantive arguments, framing the debate with slogans of "Estonian-mindedness," and failing to read the president's opinion. More broadly, supporters of the law are criticized for their lack of respect for the constitution and for dividing society, with reference made to following the example of the Soviet Union in interfering with religious freedom. The speaker rejects the opposing side's claims regarding a security threat, calling them an "outright lie," and sees no possibility for compromise, as the bill is, in his assessment, fundamentally unconstitutional.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-17
Draft law amending the Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Prevention Act and the International Sanctions Act (640 SE) - second reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session

The primary opponents are the initiators of the bill and Estonian law enforcement agencies (PPA, Kapo, the Prosecutor’s Office), who are being criticized for mass data collection and past corruption. The criticism is intense and accusatory, citing a book by a former Kapo official that describes extensive money laundering and cooperation with the criminal underworld. The speaker demands that the corrupt structures must be cleaned up before they are granted new tools.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-12
A written request for a vote of no confidence in Justice and Digital Minister Liisa-Ly Pakostale, submitted by 42 members of the Riigikogu.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The primary criticism is aimed at the Minister of Justice and Digital Affairs and the government, who are accused of untrustworthy conduct during negotiations and neglecting their oversight function regarding the Prosecutor’s Office. The opposition’s stance is intense, casting doubt on the minister’s values and trustworthiness. The criticism is both political (policy-related) and procedural.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-11
Draft law amending the Church and Religious Communities Act (570 UA) – second reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The main opponents are the bill’s proponents (coalition MPs and the Social Democrats), who are accused of deliberately violating the constitution and using deceitful rhetoric under the guise of security. The criticism is intense and focuses both on the substance of the policy (infringement of fundamental rights) and on procedural unfairness (making cosmetic changes). Compromise is ruled out as long as the bill includes the requirement to sever canonical ties.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-11
Security

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing.

A strong backlash is directed at the Reform Party-led government, which is directly accused of causing the erosion of the sense of national cohesion. The criticism targets both specific policies (tax hikes, the redefinition of marriage) and the integrity of the electoral system. The opposition's actions are described as drastically contrary to what should be uniting people (especially in the context of the war in Ukraine).
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-11
Swedish Prisoners

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing.

The primary opposition is aimed at the government and the Prime Minister (the Chairman of the Reform Party), who are being criticized for pushing through a risky and potentially detrimental plan. The criticism focuses on policy and credibility, casting doubt on the claims made by the government and Pakosta regarding the reduction of security threats. The confrontation is intense and uncompromising.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-10
The Chairman of the Supreme Court’s overview of court orders, the administration of justice, and the uniform application of laws.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.

The criticism is aimed at the senior management of the University of Tartu for tolerating the decline in the quality of legal education, and at the majority of parliament members for their lack of legal preparation and demonstrated disregard for the constitution. He/She criticizes the prevailing attitude that suggests the constitution itself should yield to political ambitions. The criticism is systemic and procedural, not personal.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-09
Inquiry regarding a network of number plate recognition cameras and the associated database (no. 756)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The main criticism is directed at the law enforcement agencies (PPA) for acting "on their own initiative" without political leadership and control. Members of the government (Prime Minister Michal, Minister of the Interior Läänemets, Minister of Justice Pakosta) are criticized for their alleged ignorance and moral failings. The criticism is procedural and ethical, focusing on the lack of accountability and the violation of the law, and no possibility of compromise is offered before the question of accountability is resolved.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-22
Draft law amending the Value Added Tax Act (596 SE) – First Reading

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.

The resistance is aimed at the government's tax increase policy, which is being sharply criticized for lacking a mandate and being undemocratic. The criticism targets both the substance of the policy and the procedure by which it was adopted, a process that has caused a significant rift in society.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-21
Draft law amending the Income Tax Act (597 SE) - First Reading

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.

The main opponent facing criticism is Finance Minister Jürgen Ligi, whose justification for the tax hikes ("greater certainty that his country can cope") is considered insufficient. The criticism is policy-based, calling into question the necessity of the tax increases and the government's priorities. The speaker contrasts the government's actions with the decisions made by the Latvian government.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-21
Draft law on establishing tax peace (607 SE) – first reading

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.

The primary criticism is aimed at the government and Prime Minister Kristen Michal, who stands accused of breaking promises and being dishonest about the tax hikes. The critique focuses both on policy (the abolition of the temporary nature of the taxes) and on procedure/communication (the Prime Minister's evasiveness and refusal to answer questions). The speaker calls into question the government's future credibility, suggesting that a new tax hike package could be immediately introduced whenever a new political event arises or a need for the Defense Forces emerges.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-21
Draft law amending the Securities Market Act and, in consequence thereof, amending other laws (588 SE) – third reading

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.

The main criticism is directed at the proponents of the bill, who are referred to as "liberals" and are accused of betraying the principles of liberalism. Specifically, Jürgen Ligi is criticized for denying the existence of sanctions, which is labeled an "outright lie." Furthermore, the governing coalition parties (SDE, Reformierakond, Eesti 200) are accused of hypocrisy because they do not implement quotas within their own governing bodies.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-21
Incident in the Gulf of Finland

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing.

The main criticism is directed at government ministers (the Minister of Defence, the Prime Minister) concerning the handling and decision-making process related to the Gulf of Finland incident. The criticism is both substantive (challenging the narrative) and procedural (lack of political approval). Additionally, the organization of parliamentary work is being criticized because a colleague (Priit Sibul) who asked an off-topic question was prioritized.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-21
War and Peace

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing.

The confrontation is directed against the executive branch (the government, the prime minister, the defense minister), criticizing their role and responsibility in authorizing the operation. The criticism is procedural and demands individual accountability by name to identify the decision-maker.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-20
Draft law amending the Enterprise Income Tax Simplification Act, the Security Tax Act, and the Income Tax Act (645 SE) – First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The main opponents are the Reform Party and Eesti 200, who are directly accused of raising taxes and lying to the voters. The criticism is intense and focuses both on the political substance (tax hikes) and the procedure (lack of a mandate). Compromise is ruled out, as snap elections are being demanded to secure a mandate; government members are even accused of being Putin's henchmen, if they themselves were not raising taxes.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-19
Inquiry regarding labor productivity, Estonia's competitiveness, and cheap labor (no. 742)

15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.

The primary confrontation targets those who are required to answer the inquiry (the government or a minister), criticizing their political failure concerning productivity and competitiveness. The criticism is intense, demanding either the refutation of the facts presented or the admission of errors, as it is purely based on policy and performance outcomes.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-19
Inquiry Regarding the Security of the Southeastern Border Region of Estonia (No. 729)

15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.

The criticism is aimed at the state's (or government's) inability to ensure adequate security and public goods, especially in Southeast Estonia. The stance is policy- and results-driven, emphasizing the failure to execute state functions.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-14
Second reading of the draft law on accession to the statute of the Institute for International Democracy and Electoral Assistance (559 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session

The main opponents are the coalition parties and the Social Democrats, who are fiercely criticized for ignoring the ideal of democracy and blocking substantive reforms. The criticism is politically and ideologically intense, accusing the opponents of moving away from democracy and favoring the federalization of Europe.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-14
Reconsideration of the Act Amending the Act on Churches and Religious Communities (570 UA), Not Proclaimed by the President of the Republic

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session

The primary adversaries are the 60 members of parliament who voted for the law, and especially former Minister of the Interior Lauri Läänemets, who is accused of brazen, outright lying and utter shamelessness. The criticism is intense and focuses on the opponents' disrespect for the constitution and the forceful imposition of an ideological project. Compromise is ruled out unless it eliminates the fundamental unconstitutionality (the requirement to sever canonical ties).
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-14
Camera network

15th Riigikogu, fifth sitting, information briefing.

The primary criticism is aimed at the government (the Prime Minister, the Ministry of the Interior) and the state bureaucracy (the PPA), which established an illegal surveillance system. The criticism is intense and focuses on procedural violations (the lack of a legal basis) and the avoidance of responsibility. The speaker feels deceived, noting that Mart Helme was also not told the honest truth about the sweeping nature of the system.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-13
Draft law amending the Courts Act and, in consequence thereof, amending other laws (to improve the administration of courts) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session

The primary criticism is directed at the government coalition and the Minister of Justice, who stand accused of maintaining oversight of the judicial system by appointing only coalition representatives to KHAN. The criticism is both substantive (a violation of the separation of powers) and procedural (a lack of an established selection process). Furthermore, the bill's proponents are criticized for failing to provide members of the Riigikogu with the judiciary's own assessment of the draft legislation.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-12
Request for information regarding population register entries (no. 754)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.

The main criticism is directed at the actions of the minister and the government, accusing them of disregarding existing law due to ideological pressure ("ideological itch"). The confrontation is intense and focuses on procedural irregularities and opposition to "trans ideology."
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-12
Inquiry regarding the Võru shooting range (no 737)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.

Fierce opposition is directed at the policies of Lauri Läänemets, the former Minister of the Interior from the Social Democratic Party, which are criticized for restricting gun permits and fostering distrust among citizens. The speaker argues that such policies render any talk of boosting national defense capabilities ridiculous. The criticism is policy- and value-based.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-12
Hearing regarding the care reform (no 719)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.

The criticism is aimed at the Prosecutor's Office's decision not to initiate criminal proceedings in the Pihlakodu case, as the speaker believes such an action cannot go unaddressed. The opposition is procedural and highlights legislative shortcomings, rather than being personal.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-08
Implementation of the 2025 presentation of the Minister of Justice and Digital Transformation, "Fundamental Principles of Legislation Policy Until 2030"

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The primary targets of criticism are the Government of the Republic and the ministries, who are accused of systematically disregarding existing law and creating arbitrary law. The Minister of Justice is criticized for the idea of selectively amending the requirement and for the lack of oversight. A compromise regarding the selective modification of the constitutional analysis is categorically rejected, as this would lead to the operation of arbitrary law.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-07
Draft law amending the Alcohol, Tobacco, Fuel and Electricity Excise Tax Act and the Value Added Tax Act (594 SE) – First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The opposing side is the political force that presented figures predicting significant state budget losses and utilized linear analyses. The criticism is methodological and procedural, accusing the opponents of shifting blame for errors onto others and essentially waving around analyses that are worth nothing. The opponents' arguments concerning oil prices are also considered unlikely to stand the test of time.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-07
Draft law amending the Unemployment Insurance Act and, in consequence thereof, amending other laws (519 SE) – Second Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The criticism is aimed at the legislative process and the work of the commission, accusing them of perfunctory and substanceless inclusion. The objection is procedural, focusing on the lack of transparency and integrity in the handling of the draft bill.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-07
Sending Estonian Defence Forces to Ukraine

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing

The main opponent is the Prime Minister and Mr. Michal, who are sharply criticized for their manipulative rhetoric, disregard for the constitution, and the low level of debate. The criticism is both procedural (ignoring the role of the Riigikogu) and substantive (ignoring security risks). No willingness to compromise is expressed; instead, they demand answers to the security questions that have been raised.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-07
Sending Estonian soldiers to Ukraine

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing

The primary opponent is the Prime Minister, who is being criticized for the readiness to send the Defense Forces to Ukraine without sufficient analysis or risk mapping. The criticism is both political and procedural, accusing the Prime Minister of a lack of statesmanship and a misunderstanding of the role of the Commander of the Defense Forces. The opposition is intense and uncompromising.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-05
Draft law amending the Competition Act and, in connection therewith, amending other laws (609 SE) - first reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

Strong opposition is directed at the Social Democrats ("Sotsid"), who are accused of programmatic hostility towards democracy and the principle of the rule of law, citing as an example their desire to criminalize hate speech. The government is sharply criticized for procedural deficiencies, as they failed to present the required constitutional analysis in the explanatory memorandum accompanying the draft bill.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-04-24
Debate on the nationally significant issue "The Drawbacks of Wind Power," initiated by the faction of the Estonian Conservative People's Party.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The main opponents are the parties in the governing coalition, who are accused of ignoring the interests of the public and serving corporate interests. The criticism is extremely intense, ranging from political opposition to recommendations to contact the State Prosecutor's Office due to signs of fraudulent activity. The opponents' narrative is considered unreliable "number magic."
View Profile View Agenda
2025-04-21
First reading of the draft resolution "Establishment of a Riigikogu investigative committee to examine the security of the Riigikogu e-election process" (576 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The main criticism is aimed at the organizers of the e-voting system, particularly Arne Koitmäe, the head of the Republic's Electoral Service, who is accused of deliberately misleading the public and jeopardizing democracy. The criticism is intense and focuses on procedural and ethical violations, such as the lack of evidence concerning manual spot checks. The Republic's Electoral Commission is also criticized for removing Märt Põder from a meeting.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-04-16
First reading of the draft resolution of the Riigikogu "Submission of a plan of action for the development of Estonia's electricity production capacities and electricity networks to the Riigikogu by the Government of the Republic, to ensure energy security" (575 OE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session

The criticism is aimed at the current decision-making process, where local people are "simply steamrolled" and their opinions are completely disregarded. The opposition is procedural, emphasizing the lack of democratic inclusion in decisions of such significance.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-04-14
Inquiry regarding offshore wind farms (no. 722)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The opposition is aimed at those planning the construction of offshore wind farms without a public referendum, criticizing both the procedure and the use of taxpayer money. The criticism is intense and demands radical democratic intervention (a referendum, the right to veto), ruling out any compromise with the current decision-making process.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-04-10
The Chancellor of Justice's proposal to align the Motor Vehicle Tax Act and the Road Traffic Act with the Basic Law.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The confrontation is directed at the governing coalition and those who passed the law (including colleagues Timpson and Sutrop), who are accused of hypocrisy and knowingly adopting an unconstitutional law. The criticism is intense, focusing both on procedural errors (voting down amendments) and moral failings. Disappointment is also expressed regarding the Chancellor of Justice, who failed to raise the issue of unconstitutionality concerning large families.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-04-09
Draft law (559 SE) for the accession of the Statute of the International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance – First Reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session

The speaker sharply criticizes the bill's sponsors and Ministry of Foreign Affairs officials, accusing them of wasting taxpayer money and supporting an organization funded by "deep state structures." Furthermore, he criticizes the government as a whole, demanding its resignation and the holding of snap elections due to low public support. The criticism addresses both policy matters and procedural issues.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-04-09
The first reading of the draft resolution (569 OE) of the Riigikogu, "Proposal to the Government of the Republic to temporarily suspend the processing of all planning procedures related to wind farms, with a deferral until the establishment of an up-to-date methodology for infrasound measurements and the setting of limit values for sound pressure levels."

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session

The confrontation is aimed at those who oppose the draft bill, who are considered "unreasonable" people who fail to ensure the protection of public health. The criticism is directed at the lack of safety and compensation mechanisms, which render participation and communication pointless.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-04-09
Draft law amending the Churches and Religious Communities Act (570 SE) - Third Reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session

The primary opponents are the government and coalition MPs, who are accused of profound dishonesty, manipulation, and wasting taxpayer money on a PR agency (the Meta agency). The Minister of the Interior (Lauri Läänemets) is criticized for avoiding substantive replies regarding the scenario of forced termination. The criticism is both policy-based and procedural.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-04-09
Draft law amending the Income Tax Act (566 SE) – First Reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session

The confrontation is directed at the government and the parliamentary majority, who are being sharply criticized both for their political choices (tax hikes) and for their unwavering defense of banks against the taxation of windfall profits. The criticism is intense and politically motivated, accusing the government of attacking the assets of homeowners and large families.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-04-09
Continuation of the first reading of the draft law on declaring the Motor Vehicle Tax Act invalid (592 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session

The opposition is directed against the newly established motor vehicle tax law, criticizing its unfair provisions and constitutional inconsistency. The criticism is intense and politically charged, focusing on the law's failure to account for specific social needs. The speaker believes that the law makes a mockery of the constitutional clause regarding special care for large families.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-04-09
Money transfers to Estonian defense industry companies under the slogan "Assistance to Ukraine."

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing

The primary opposition is aimed at the government and the responsible minister, who are being criticized for a lack of transparency and providing inaccurate answers. Criticism is also leveled against potential conflicts of interest stemming from the movement of former top ministry and Defence Forces officials into the defense industry (Frankenburg).
View Profile View Agenda
2025-04-08
Draft law amending the Securities Market Act and, in consequence thereof, amending other laws (588 SE) - first reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

Fierce opposition is aimed at the bill's presenter, who is being criticized for distorting the facts concerning the actual substance of the proposal. The criticism is politically motivated and centers on the opposing party's failure to acknowledge the massive fines (up to 400,000 euros) mandated by the legislation. The opponent’s assertions are being directly labeled as false.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-03-26
Draft law amending the Church and Religious Communities Act (570 SE) – second reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The primary conflict is with the bill's initiators and supporters, particularly former Minister of the Interior Lauri Läänemets, who faces criticism for failing to provide answers regarding the issue of forced closure. The criticism is intense and multifaceted, accusing opponents of procedural deficiencies, disregard for the rule of law, and exacerbating security threats. Furthermore, Jaanus Karilaid is criticized for his lack of expertise, and the Estonian Council of Churches (ECC) for its passivity.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-03-19
Draft law amending the Defence Service Act (563 SE) - first reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

There is strong opposition to the coalition/government, criticizing their stance on reservists and their financial priorities. This opposition is both substantive—concerning the channeling of funds to foreign corporations—and procedural, stemming from the unjustified rejection of the proposal during the first reading. The speaker also sharply criticizes the annual salary increase for Riigikogu members, arguing that it highlights the government's hypocrisy and self-centeredness.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-03-18
Draft law amending the Political Parties Act and the Credit Institutions Act (585 SE) – first reading

Fifteenth Riigikogu, fifth sitting, plenary session

The primary adversaries are the governing coalition (specifically Eesti 200 and the Social Democrats) and Minister Pakosta. The criticism targets both political legitimacy (Eesti 200’s weak support and mandate) and procedural flaws (the absence of a constitutional analysis). The Committee for the Supervision of Party Financing (ERJK) is particularly harshly criticized as a politically appointed body controlled by the Social Democrats, which permits itself arbitrary abuses (e.g., the SAPTK case). Compromise is ruled out; the demand is for the draft bill to be rejected.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-03-17
Inquiry regarding the third year of record-low birth rates in Estonia (no. 703)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The criticism is directed at the inefficiency of national policy, as the speaker believes that the verbal appreciation of motherhood is not adequately reflected in concrete measures. The opposition is moderate and policy-centric, emphasizing the lack of genuine support.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-03-13
First reading of the draft resolution "Establishment of a Riigikogu investigative committee to assess the risks associated with modified mRNA COVID-19 vaccines" (557 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session

The speaker is in strong opposition to the government, the scientific advisory council (specifically Irja Lutsar), pharmaceutical regulatory bodies, and the mainstream media. The criticism targets both the political aspects (unjustified restrictions, avoidance of accountability) and the procedural aspects (conflict of interest in critical analysis, rushed market approval). The media is accused of unequivocally acting as a "propaganda mouthpiece," and the courts are accused of providing cover for the government.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-03-12
Draft law amending the Rules of Procedure Act of the Riigikogu (552 SE) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session

The primary conflict is directed at the group of deputies (likely the coalition) who supported the rejection of the bill, and who are being criticized for political hypocrisy and establishing uneven rules. The criticism is intense and focuses on procedural injustice, implying that they desire rules that bind the opponent, but not themselves.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-03-12
Ensuring Estonia's security

The 15th Riigikogu, fifth sitting, information briefing.

The primary confrontation is directed at the government, which is criticized for "unnecessary and pointless" rhetoric aimed at both Russia and the USA, damaging Estonian interests. The criticism is intense and concerns both security policy and the divergence in values with the new US administration. Former and current politicians (Ilves, Mihkelson) are also indirectly criticized for anti-American opposition, which has weakened security guarantees.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-02-27
A written request from 21 members of the Riigikogu expressing a vote of no confidence in Climate Minister Yoko Alender.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The primary opponent is Climate Minister Yoko Alender, who stands accused of systematic lying, obfuscation, and evading questions. The criticism has reached maximum intensity, focusing on both procedural shortcomings and ethical breaches, with direct references to criminal liability and the possibility of a prison sentence.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-02-25
Draft law amending the Constitution of the Republic of Estonia (536 SE) – second reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The main criticism is directed against the government and its supporters, who use the security threat as a pretext for pushing through laws without substantive arguments. The criticism is procedural and political, accusing opponents of the improper use of state secrets and expressing political stances under the guise of security analysis. Opponents are also accused of labeling those who disagree with the government's security framework as "anti-Estonian."
View Profile View Agenda
2025-02-19
Draft law amending the Church and Religious Communities Act (570 SE) – First Reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary sitting

The main opponents are the proponents of the bill and the government, who stand accused of violating religious freedom, trampling on the principles of the rule of law, and engaging in demagoguery. The criticism is intense and includes accusations of "tyrannizing" and a "mafia-like approach" when threatening the forced termination of religious associations. Compromise has been ruled out, with calls for the bill to be rejected.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-02-19
Shared values with the United States of America

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th sitting, information briefing

The criticism is aimed at the previous US administration, whose values the new government is not guided by, and at those in Europe who are abandoning fundamental values. It also targets those who consider various indices relevant when evaluating policy, rather than focusing on the concrete facts of the policy being implemented.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-02-19
Security

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th sitting, information briefing

The main opponent is the government coalition, which is criticized for forcibly pushing through legislation that violates religious freedom. The criticism is intense and accuses the government of issuing threats from a position of power and persecuting Christians. The opponent's actions are considered detrimental to Estonia's security interests, as they provide serious propaganda material for the Russian media.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-02-12
A written request for a vote of no confidence in Prime Minister Kristen Michal, submitted by 29 members of the Riigikogu.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The main opponent is Prime Minister Kristen Michal and the government he leads, who are being criticized for political failures and the loss of public trust. The criticism is intense, ranging from political incompetence to suggestions of a criminal pattern within the energy sector. Compromise is ruled out, as the demand is for the Prime Minister's resignation.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-02-12
Freedom of Belief and Security

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing

The confrontation is directed at the government, which introduced Bill 570, and at those who allow keywords related to Russia or Moscow to shut down rational analysis. The criticism is both procedural and substantive, as the opposing side is unable to present concrete facts regarding the threat to Estonian security. The speaker criticizes the government’s actions as a departure from the principle of the rule of law.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-02-11
A debate on foreign policy initiated as a matter of significant national importance by the Foreign Affairs Committee.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The primary criticism is leveled against the government and the political elite, who are willing to sacrifice national and state interests simply to comply with the directives of external allies. The criticism is both political and conceptual, fundamentally questioning Estonia’s sovereignty. There is no expressed willingness to compromise; instead, the opposing side is demanded to justify its actions.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-01-29
Energetics

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th sitting, information briefing

The main criticism is directed at the government, which is pushing through energy policy decisions "at breakneck speed" and without sufficient consultation. The objection is both procedural and financial, accusing the government of ignoring widespread support and rushing the process.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-01-27
Inquiry regarding elementary school textbooks (no. 672)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

It strongly opposes those who promote gender ideology in schools, accusing them of misrepresenting the scientific consensus. The criticism is intense and ideological, alleging that opponents are subjecting children to brainwashing. There is no apparent willingness to compromise.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-01-22
First reading of the draft statement of the Riigikogu "In Support of the People of Georgia" (564 AE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session.

The primary adversaries are the proponents of the draft statement and the Government of the Republic, particularly Foreign Minister Margus Tsahkna, who is sharply criticized for interfering in Georgia's internal affairs. The criticism is intense and principled, accusing the opponents of pursuing an undemocratic political agenda aimed at toppling a government they dislike. Compromise is ruled out, as the draft proposal is being rejected as "based on falsehoods."
View Profile View Agenda
2025-01-22
Double Standards in Foreign Policy

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing

The primary adversary is the Government of the Republic of Estonia, specifically those responsible for foreign policy (Margus Tsahkna is mentioned). The criticism targets the inconsistency and double standards inherent in the government's actions, accusing them of selective interference in the internal affairs of other nations. This opposition is intense and stems from the violation of fundamental political principles.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-01-21
First reading of the draft resolution of the Riigikogu "Submitting a proposal to the Government of the Republic for the procurement of ammunition with a cost of 1.6 billion euros for the years 2025–2028" (540 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session

The opposition is directed at those who advocate increasing the national defense budget without substantive analysis, criticizing the slogan-driven nature of the debate. It criticizes the process where the most ardent patriot is considered to be the one demanding the largest budget, rather than the one who ensures a qualitative leap in development. The criticism is policy- and procedure-based, not personal.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-01-13
Request for information regarding the restoration and resilience plan and the use of oil shale (no. 668)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The opposition is aimed at the timeline of the government's energy policy, particularly the speed at which it plans to phase out oil shale energy. The criticism is policy-driven, citing the premature nature of these plans given the existing security threats and infrastructure vulnerability.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-12-18
Draft law (541 SE) for the first reading amending the Act of Implementing the Construction Code and Planning Act, the Environmental Charges Act, and the Planning Act (Accelerating the Adoption of Renewable Energy)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The criticism is directed against the inaction of the Government of the Republic in ensuring the transparency of spatial planning, and the Climate Minister is being addressed with the aim of calling into question the strategic realism of the transition to 100% renewable energy. The criticism is based on policy and procedure.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-12-18
Intervention in Georgia's internal affairs

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, press briefing

The main opponent is the Foreign Minister, who is being criticized for interfering in Georgia's internal affairs, violating international law, and failing to answer questions. Furthermore, the Speaker of the Riigikogu is sharply criticized for bias and violating procedural rules, specifically because he allows the minister to level baseless accusations about spreading Kremlin narratives. Compromise is ruled out, as the specific evidence and answers being demanded are not forthcoming.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-12-16
Overview of the Implementation of the "Fundamental Principles of Law-Making Policy Until 2030" in 2023.

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

The primary criticism is directed at the Government of the Republic and the Minister of Justice, accusing them of systemically disregarding the requirements for good legislative practice and constitutional analysis. The criticism is intense and procedural, emphasizing that merely acknowledging the problems is insufficient if the pattern repeats year after year. The practice of using fast-track procedures for bills related to the coalition agreement and the state budget is particularly criticized.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-12-16
Overview of the Implementation of the Fundamentals of Criminal Policy until 2030

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

The primary confrontation is with the Minister of Justice, who is sharply criticized for disregarding the democratic process during the interviewing of judicial candidates. The criticism is procedural, emphasizing that the ministry should not assume that the positions held by critical questioners are incorrect. The attack is intense and accuses the minister of violating democratic norms.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-12-11
Security situation

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth session, press briefing.

The primary opposition is aimed at the actions of the Government of the Republic and the Riigikogu majority that passed Decision 479. The criticism is both procedural and political, stressing that the government should not be making such weighty security decisions without specific parliamentary approval. The opposition is intense because this is a matter of constitutional significance.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-12-11
National Defence and Wind Turbines

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth session, press briefing.

The criticism is aimed at the government and local municipalities, accusing them of concealing comprehensive information and disregarding the public's health concerns. The opposition is intense, focusing on procedural mismanagement and misplaced priorities, specifically where the concerns of the Defense Forces are deemed more important than the health of the civilian population.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-12-10
Draft law amending the Waste Act and, in consequence, amending other laws (461 SE) - second reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

The opposition is directed at a specific provision of the draft bill (the 800-euro state fee), criticizing its legal basis and essentially calling it a fine. The criticism is conceptual and intense, accusing the bill's authors of distorting the concept of the state fee.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-12-09
Inquiry regarding phosphate mining plans (no. 664)

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting

The criticism targets the assumptions and the overall approach stipulating that phosphorite mining should be carried out via a concession mechanism. The objection is strong and procedural, raising serious doubts about why this kind of approach is even being considered.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-12-05
Draft law (534 SE) on Estonia’s accession to the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child concerning procedures for complaints

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session.

The primary opponent is the Government of the Republic and the political parties involved in its activities, who are accused of being hostile to children and families. The criticism is intense and addresses both moral policy (abortion funding) and legal threats (the creation of a mechanism for bypassing laws). The opponent's efforts in the name of child protection are deemed "absolutely not to be taken seriously."
View Profile View Agenda
2024-12-04
Second reading of the draft law amending the Alcohol, Tobacco, Fuel and Electricity Excise Tax Act and other laws (510 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting

The main adversary is the coalition/government supporting the draft bill, which is criticized both for its policy (ineffective improvement of security) and its ethics (lying about the temporary nature of the tax hike). The speaker accuses the opponents of avoiding sensitive topics and using emotionally charged labels to ram the tax increase down the public's throat.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-12-04
Second reading of the draft resolution (486 OE) of the Riigikogu regarding the extension of the term of use of the Defence Forces in fulfilling Estonia's international obligations in a post-conflict peacekeeping operation in Lebanon, Israel, Egypt, Jordan, and Syria.

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting

The main opponents are Reform Party colleague Alar Laneman, and MPs Kalev Stoicescu and Raimond Kaljulaid. The criticism is intense and personal, accusing the opponents of lying, spreading defamation, and voting against the constitution. The speaker accuses Laneman of adopting "lowly" manners upon joining the Reform Party.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-12-04
The second reading of the draft resolution (479 OE) of the Riigikogu concerning "The use of the Defence Forces in fulfilling Estonia’s international obligations in a North Atlantic Treaty Organization or member state, European Union, or United Nations-led international military operation, upon its initial contribution"

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting

The confrontation is aimed at the Government of the Republic, which is being criticized for seeking to delegate excessive decision-making power, and at the Riigikogu majority, which is voting for the unconstitutional bill. Criticism is also directed at the Chancellor of Justice and the President for their inaction regarding previous unconstitutional delegations. Kaja Kallas is mentioned separately in connection with her rhetoric of strategic ambiguity, which makes granting the mandate especially perilous.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-12-04
Second reading of the draft resolution of the Riigikogu "Extension of the term of use of the Defence Forces in the performance of Estonia's international obligations in an international military operation Inherent Resolve" (477 OE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting

The main opponents are Defense Minister Hanno Pevkur (who failed to provide a clear answer) and, more broadly, the government, which supports an operation that violates international law. The criticism is intense and principled, accusing politicians of practicing double standards and violating moral standards. Earlier Estonian politicians responsible for supporting the 2003 aggression in Iraq are also being criticized.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-12-03
Continuation of the second reading of the draft law amending the Child Protection Act and other laws (427 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The criticism is aimed at the supporters of the current draft bill and the prevailing political "mentality" that fails to take child protection seriously and instead focuses on superfluous details. The opposition is rooted in policy and procedure, accusing opponents of carelessly throwing important legislation (such as ending abortion funding) in the trash. The speaker demands unconditional and absolute action, ruling out any possibility of compromise.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-21
Discussion of the nationally significant issue initiated by the Environment Committee: "The Impact of Climate Change on Estonia's Legal Framework and Economy."

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session

The main opponents are the proponents of the anthropogenic climate change thesis, scientists, and policymakers who support EU measures. The criticism is intense and epistemological, accusing the opposing side of presenting unsubstantiated claims and comparing the situation to the "total lies" spread during the COVID pandemic.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-20
Draft law amending the Constitution of the Republic of Estonia (527 SE) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The opposition is aimed at the rapid and unanalyzed adoption of the draft legislation, as this could increase security risks, contrary to the bill's stated objective. The criticism is both procedural and political, demanding accountability to prevent the escalation of security threats. The speaker disputes the claims made by the bill's proponents regarding the existence of security analyses.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-20
Draft law amending the Constitution of the Republic of Estonia (536 SE) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The opposition is aimed at those responsible for managing the bill's process and the presiding officer. They criticize both the violation of the Rules of Procedure concerning speaking time and the irresponsible approach taken toward assessing security threats. The criticism is both procedural and political, warning that merely waving slogans about reducing security risks could, in reality, lead to an escalation of those risks.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-20
Amendment of the Constitution

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, press briefing.

The main opponents are the government leadership, especially Interior Minister Läänemets and the Prime Minister, who are being criticized for baselessly brandishing and misusing the security threat card. The opposition is intense and focuses on the factual groundlessness of political decisions (restricting voting rights) and specific claims (the alleged threat posed by Pühtitsa Convent).
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-18
Inquiry regarding tax changes (no. 657)

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth Session, Plenary Session

The main opponent is the ruling coalition, which is being criticized for implementing tax hikes. The criticism is policy-driven, questioning the justification and effectiveness of these taxes in ensuring security. The confrontation is intense because the government's core security policy narrative is being challenged.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-13
Second reading of the draft law on the 2025 state budget (513 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.

The main criticism is directed at the government coalition and the Reform Party, ridiculing their rhetoric concerning the supposed fixing of the state's finances. The criticism is intense, focusing both on incompetence (raising taxes during an economic downturn) and procedural shortcomings (budget opacity). The speaker considers the opposition's work essentially pointless, arguing that "the train is moving forward regardless."
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-13
Statements by the Defence Forces Commander regarding the war reaching Estonia.

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, information briefing

The main opponent is the Government of the Republic and the Prime Minister, who are criticized for the lack of diplomatic steps and for facilitating escalation. The criticism is both political (strategy-based) and personal, demanding confirmation from the Prime Minister that they will remain in Estonia in the event of war. The intensity of the criticism is high, accusing the government of prolonging the war.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-13
Freedom of belief

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, information briefing

The main opponent is the government ("the government led by you"), which is accused of violating the constitution and harassing the monastery. The criticism is intense, focusing on political injustice and the lack of any legal basis. The government's security arguments are branded as "a complete, disgraceful lie," and compromise is ruled out because the issue involves the violation of constitutional rights.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-13
Breathing Estonia

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, information briefing

The criticism is aimed at the government or the responsible agencies, who must answer questions regarding evacuation logistics, which are deemed to have been insufficiently addressed. The speaker supports and continues the serious issue raised by Martin Helme, referencing the need for opposition cooperation.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-11
Draft law amending the Act on Termination of Pregnancy and Sterilisation (459 SE) - First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

The criticism is directed at the governing coalition, which stands accused of automatically rejecting the opposition's draft legislation ("it goes straight to the trash bin") and implementing anti-family policies (cutting benefits, introducing the car tax, and revoking health insurance for stay-at-home mothers). The criticism is political, ideological, and procedural, citing specifically the behavior of the committee chairman. The coalition's policy is being labeled "anti-human policy."
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-06
First reading of the draft resolution (479 OE) of the Riigikogu concerning "The use of the Defence Forces in fulfilling the international obligations of the Republic of Estonia in a North Atlantic Treaty Organisation or member state, European Union, or United Nations-led international military operation involving the first contribution thereto."

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The main opponent is the government and the Minister of Defence, who are being criticized for violating the constitution and disregarding the opposition's viewpoints. The criticism is intense and procedural, accusing the government of unlawfully usurping the Riigikogu's decision-making authority. Furthermore, the arguments of colleague Peeter Tali concerning the objective of warfare are also criticized, stressing that the Riigikogu requires information regarding "who they are going to war against and for what purpose."
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-06
First reading of the draft resolution of the Riigikogu (Parliament) entitled "Extension of the term of use of the Defence Forces in fulfilling the international obligations of the Republic of Estonia on the North Atlantic Treaty Organization mission in Iraq" (478 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The primary opposition is aimed at the bill's sponsor, who is being criticized for evading answers and is accused of implicitly condoning actions that violate international law (namely, supporting the occupation of Syria). The criticism is intense and grounded in policy and principle.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-06
First reading of the draft resolution of the Riigikogu, "Extension of the term of use of the Defence Forces in the performance of Estonia's international obligations in an international military operation Inherent Resolve" (477 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The standoff is aimed at the minister, who is being criticized for repeatedly refusing to answer a direct question regarding adherence to international law in Syria. The criticism is both procedural and political, demanding accountability and principled conduct from the government.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-05
Overview of the Government of the Republic’s Activities in the Implementation of European Union Policy

Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session

The primary criticism targets the government and the Riigikogu (Parliament), who have passed unrealistic, economy-damaging laws (100% renewable electricity). The criticism is policy- and results-driven, emphasizing that the goals set far exceed those of the European Union.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-10-24
Second reading of the draft law (469 SE) ratifying the International Labour Organization’s (ILO) Convention No. 190 concerning the elimination of violence and harassment in the world of work

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session

The opposition is aimed at the proponents of the convention's ratification, particularly the Chairman of the Social Affairs Committee, who is being criticized for a procedural deficiency. The criticism stems from the fact that the actual benefits of joining the convention for the Republic of Estonia were not discussed during the committee session. The resistance is based on both policy and procedure.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-10-23
A written request for a vote of no confidence in Finance Minister Jürgen Ligi, submitted by 29 members of the Riigikogu.

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session

The main opponent is Finance Minister Jürgen Ligi, against whom a motion of no confidence has been filed. The criticism is intense and twofold: personal (lying and insulting a female colleague) and political (ignoring the difficulties faced by small businesses in light of tax increases). Compromise is ruled out, as the objective is the complete undermining of the minister's credibility.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-10-23
Minister of the Interior's political statement on internal security

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session

The main target of criticism is the Minister of the Interior and the ruling coalition, who are accused of wasting parliamentary time on "propaganda shows" and violating constitutional rights. The criticism is intense and uncompromising, demanding the minister's resignation and accusing him of provoking conflict. The criticism is aimed at both political decisions and procedural unfairness.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-10-23
Renewable Energy Support Payments

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, information briefing

The primary opponent is the government and the prime minister, whose policies are fiercely criticized for their unfairness and the irresponsible handling of taxpayer funds. The criticism targets both the political logic (specifically, why support profitable entities?) and the moral dimension, accusing the government of "funneling" taxpayer money directly to businesses.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-10-23
Red symbolism in public spaces

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, information briefing

The main opposition is directed at the government and Interior Minister Läänemets, who is being criticized for approving the police operation that led to the violation of the inviolability of private property. The criticism is intense and focuses on procedural and rule-of-law violations, rather than on individuals. The actions of the opponents are being termed an "unlawful act."
View Profile View Agenda
2024-10-22
Draft resolution "Proposal to the Republic of Estonia's Government regarding the introduction of a temporary solidarity tax on the banking sector" (487 OE) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

The primary opponents are banks, who are accused of unfairly accumulating exorbitant profits, as well as bank analysts, whose views are untrustworthy due to their dependence on their salaries. The criticism is intense and political, labeling the banks' activities as "plundering" and "robbery."
View Profile View Agenda
2024-10-21
Inquiry Regarding the Confiscation of the Estonian Soldier Memorial (no 642)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The primary opponents are the governments of the Republic of Estonia (both the current one and the Juhan Parts government from 20 years ago), who are criticized for obstructing citizens' efforts and damaging the nation's self-respect. The criticism is intense and focuses on the government's inaction and the police's dishonest and rights-violating handling of the case, demanding a public apology and the immediate return of the monument's replica.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-10-21
Inquiry Regarding Tax Increases (No. 647)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The main opponent is Jürgen Ligi, who is directly accused of being caught in "blatant dishonesty." The criticism is intense, personal, and focuses on ethics and commenting on the appearance of female colleagues. Compromise is ruled out; only a confession and an apology are demanded.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-10-21
Request for Information Regarding Prison Space Rental (no. 645)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The main criticism is aimed at the government and the coalition, accusing them of poor national planning, lack of accountability, and schemes involving hidden interests. The coalition's plans to criminalize hate speech are facing particularly sharp criticism, as this is viewed as a dangerous restriction of freedoms. The speaker demands accountability and an investigation into the corrupt schemes.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-10-16
Draft law on the 2025 state budget (513 SE) - first reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The main opposition is directed at the government’s fiscal policy, particularly the expenditures falling under the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Economic Affairs and Communications (MKM). The criticism targets the imprudent use of financial resources and procedural lack of transparency (specifically, the absence of explanations in the explanatory memorandum).
View Profile View Agenda
2024-10-16
Draft Security Tax Act (512 SE) – First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The primary opposition is directed at the government, whose explanations are considered "completely contradictory" and confusing. Criticism targets the substance of the policy (the use of funds) and the lack of transparency in the procedure. The speaker also references the government's previous accusations that "the right wing is lying," which demonstrates an awareness of the broader political confrontation.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-10-16
Draft law amending the State Budget Act (511 SE) - First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The confrontation is directed against representatives of the government who have disparaged the opposition's questions ("stupid and nagging"). The criticism is procedural and constitutional, stressing that the government's method of drafting the budget impedes the constitutional role of the Riigikogu. The intensity of the attack is high, as the speaker equates the opposition's concerns with those of the Auditor General and the Chancellor of Justice.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-10-14
Draft law amending the Family Benefits Act and other laws (507 SE) – first reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting

The main opponents are the presenters of the draft bill, who are accused of the ideological restructuring of family models and lying in the explanatory memorandum. The criticism is intense and focuses both on the substance of the policy (cuts) and on ethical issues (deceit).
View Profile View Agenda
2024-10-10
Draft law amending the Child Protection Act and other laws (427 SE) – second reading

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth sitting, plenary session.

The confrontation is aimed at the coalition and the commission, criticizing them for their inability to present amendments that would exclude convicted pedophiles from working with children. The criticism is focused on both policy and procedure, accusing the coalition of failing to act in accordance with their own stated personal positions. The new risks that the draft bill creates for coaches are also being criticized.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-10-09
Nordica

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, information briefing

The primary criticism is directed at Nordica’s management, the state’s bureaucratic system, and the officials who should be preventing bankruptcies and ensuring accountability. The criticism is intense and focuses on procedural failure and a lack of responsibility, citing the Port of Tallinn case as an example.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-10-09
Phosphorite mining

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, information briefing

The confrontation is directed at the government and the Riigikogu (Parliament), who are criticized for ignoring the people's right to self-determination for over 20 years and for avoiding the organization of a referendum. Criticism is also aimed at the lack of transparency and unreliability of the electoral system, which calls into question the mandate of the Riigikogu and the government.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-10-09
Sending Estonian soldiers to Ukraine

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, information briefing

The primary opponent is the government, which is being criticized for its vague and potentially contradictory stance on the issue of deploying Estonian soldiers. Criticism is aimed both at the substance of the policy (the lack of a clear position) and the procedures involved (specifically, who is responsible for making the decision). The speaker demands accountability and transparency, pointing to the possibility that Estonian defense personnel may already be conducting training in Ukraine.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-10-07
Inquiry regarding road construction and four-lane roads (no 408)

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session

The opposition is aimed at the government's policy and inaction, criticizing the lack of transparency in the use of earmarked tax revenue (fuel excise duty). The criticism is directed at the minister responsible for the sector, demanding specific data from him regarding the proportions of excise duty collected and utilized.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-09-25
Constitutional analysis in the explanatory notes of bills

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, press briefing

The main targets of criticism are Ministers Yoko Alender and Vladimir Svet, who are being criticized for their proposal to either abolish or restrict the requirement for constitutional analysis. Criticism is also aimed at "several consecutive governments" for failing to meet this obligation, citing the Ministry of Climate's draft bill as a clear example of the missing analysis. The criticism is procedural and political, not personal.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-09-18
Economic stimulus

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, press briefing

The main confrontation is directed at the Reform Party government and the Prime Minister, who are accused of continuing the practice of distributing non-transparent subsidies. The criticism is both procedural and policy-based, focusing on the improper and uncontrolled expenditure of public funds.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-09-17
Report by the Chancellor of Justice on the compliance of legal instruments with the Constitution and the performance of other duties imposed on the Chancellor of Justice by law.

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

The main criticism is directed at the Chancellor of Justice, who is accused of failing to initiate proceedings and of succumbing to possible political pressure. Furthermore, laws adopted by the Riigikogu (317 SE and 332 SE) are being opposed due to their conflict with the constitution, especially concerning the delegation of decision-making power and the alienation of property.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-09-16
First Reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "On the Development of Measures for Increasing the Birth Rate" (208 OE)

The 15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting.

The primary confrontation is directed at the coalition ("your coalition partners"), who are criticized for automatically and unjustifiably shelving opposition bills. The criticism is both procedural and intense, pointing to systemic resistance against vital initiatives.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-09-16
2024 Report by the Minister of the Interior on the Implementation of the State's Long-Term Development Strategy "Estonia 2035"

The 15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting.

The primary opponent is the Social Democratic Party. Discussions regarding the seizure of their assets are being criticized extremely intensely, with critics comparing these actions to the behavioral patterns of a criminal organization. The criticism is value-based, denying the legitimacy of the opposing side's ideas and calling into question their political normalcy.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-09-11
The confiscation of the Lihula monument by the PPA

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, press briefing.

The main opponents are the current government (Mr. Prime Minister Michal) and the previous government (Juhan Parts), who are accused of disgraceful conduct and suppressing the aspirations of citizens. The criticism is intense and politically value-based, alleging that the government is amplifying Russia's historical narrative and is clearly violating the law. The possibility of compromise is not mentioned.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-07-22
Granting Authorization to Prime Ministerial Candidate Kristen Michal to Form the Government

15th Riigikogu, Riigikogu's extraordinary session.

The main opponent is the Reform Party and the government it leads, which faces sharp criticism for political insincerity and lacking a mandate to push through tax hikes. The criticism is both procedural and political, accusing the opposing side of deceiving voters and abusing power. The intensity of the opposition is high, demanding either that the plans be abandoned or that snap elections be called.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-06-19
Third Reading of the Bill Amending the Land Tax Act (437 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, extra plenary sitting

The main confrontation is directed at the Government of the Republic and Prime Minister Kaja Kallas, who are accused of deceiving voters regarding tax hikes before the elections. The criticism is intense, political, and value-based, accusing the government of going after people's homes. Compromise in supporting the draft bill is completely ruled out.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-06-12
Overview of the Judicial Administration by Villu Kõve, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.

The main targets are the Government of the Republic for imposing unlawful restrictions, and the court system (especially the Supreme Court) for delaying the substantive assessment. The criticism is intense and procedural, accusing the court of justifying the government's behavior and shirking responsibility. The Riigikogu and the coalition are also criticized for their inaction regarding the reform of criminal procedure.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-06-11
First Reading of the Riigikogu Draft Statement "On the Crisis of Democracy in Georgia" (449 AE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.

The main targets of criticism are Foreign Minister Margus Tsahkna for his intervention in Tbilisi and the Riigikogu Foreign Affairs Committee, which drafted an interventionist statement. The criticism is intense, focusing on undignified conduct, procedural errors, and the application of double standards.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-06-10
Interpellation regarding the non-taxation of banks' extraordinary profits (No. 615)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The opposition is aimed at those who are responding to the inquiry, criticizing their economic-philosophical approach concerning usury and state intervention. The criticism is directed at the values underlying the policy and the limits of their acceptability.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-06-10
Inquiry regarding Ukraine's Accession to the European Union (No. 613)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The opposition is aimed at the vague answers provided by the government or the minister concerning the impacts of Ukraine's accession on Estonia. The criticism is procedural, demanding clear conditions and assessments regarding the boundaries of supporting the accession.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-06-05
Second reading of the Motor Vehicle Tax Bill (364 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The main opponent is the governing coalition, which is sharply criticized for violating procedural rules, stifling obstruction, and ignoring public opinion (80,000 signatures). The criticism is intense and ideological, accusing the coalition of committing "outrages." Compromise is ruled out, as there is a promise to immediately repeal any laws adopted by the coalition.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-06-05
Third Reading of the Draft Act on the Crypto-Asset Market (Bill 398 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The primary adversary is the ruling coalition, especially the Reform Party, which is accused of systematically stifling entrepreneurship and being untrustworthy. The criticism is intense, focusing on political missteps (bureaucracy, taxes) and the application of a presumption of guilt toward business owners. The government’s actions are viewed as baffling and destructive to the country’s business-friendly reputation.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-06-03
First Reading of the Draft Resolution (409 OE) of the Riigikogu "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic to Implement Effective Measures to Protect Minors from Exposure to Pornography"

Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary sitting.

The criticism is aimed at the government and ministries for systematic inaction and failure to enforce the law, as well as for waiting for European Union solutions. The representative criticizes coalition members (the Reform Party, Social Democrats, Eesti 200) for potentially voting without providing substantive arguments, and rejects the comparison to the Chinese totalitarian model. He/She expresses a willingness to defy EU directives if they impede the protection of children.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-06-03
The written motion for a vote of no confidence in the Minister of Economic Affairs and Information Technology, Tiit Riisalo, submitted by 22 members of the Riigikogu.

Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary sitting.

The core conflict is aimed squarely at the Minister of Economic Affairs and Information Technology and the government's overall policy, particularly concerning the Tax Authority's plans. The criticism is intense, focusing on political decisions that damage the business environment and undermine the principle of trust. This opposition is rooted in both policy disagreements and fundamental values.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-29
First reading of the Riigikogu Draft Resolution "Supporting the Introduction of Nuclear Energy in Estonia" (431 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

Criticism is aimed at the sponsors of the draft bill, who are accused of sidestepping the fundamental issue of ownership relations. The opposition is both procedural and ideological, warning against serving the interests of corporations at the expense of the welfare of the Estonian people. The speaker deems this approach "absurd" and unacceptable.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-29
First reading of the Bill amending the Land Tax Act (437 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The primary opponent is the government, which is being criticized for attempting to shirk responsibility and forcing local municipalities to tax their own residents directly. The criticism is intense, focusing on the morality of the government's actions and the political hypocrisy demonstrated by ignoring the concerns of landowners. The government's activities are being referred to as the constant burdening of property.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-29
Interference in Georgia's internal affairs

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, information briefing

The main criticism is aimed at the government, led by the Prime Minister, and Foreign Minister Margus Tsahkna, who are accused of violating diplomatic norms and interfering in the internal affairs of another country. The criticism is principled and political, focusing on the immorality of the government's actions and the international damage caused. The speaker also criticizes the Prime Minister's responses, calling them insufficient and non-responsive to the questions.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-29
Estonian-Georgian Relations

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, information briefing

The main adversary is the government, particularly the foreign minister, whose actions in Georgia are sharply criticized as "blatant interference" in the internal affairs of another state. The criticism is intense and principled, demanding a direct assessment from the prime minister regarding the foreign minister's conduct. Furthermore, the Estonian e-voting system is also under sharp criticism.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-28
Second Reading of the Bill for the Amendment of the Income Tax Act (416 SE)

15th Riigikogu, third session, plenary session

The primary opponent is the Reform Party and Prime Minister Kaja Kallas, who is sharply criticized for withdrawing election promises and for failing to oppose the handling of the draft bill in the Finance Committee. The criticism is intense and includes direct accusations of lying and making unsubstantiated promises. The opposition is directed both at the political content and the procedural actions taken within the committee.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-27
Interpellation concerning events in care homes (No. 571)

Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary session

The opposition is directed against the inaction or ambiguity of the government or the responsible ministry, criticizing their "general talk" and demanding concrete accountability for the failure of supervision over care homes. The criticism is procedural and based on political performance, demanding the identification of those responsible and the revocation of licenses.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-27
Interpellation concerning the collection of data on post-abortion complications (No. 550)

Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary session

The confrontation is directed at the relevant authorities (primarily the National Institute for Health Development) and a government representative, all of whom are being criticized for insufficient data collection and for failing to provide substantive responses. The criticism is intense and focuses on procedural shortcomings that impede women's ability to make informed decisions and receive the necessary assistance.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-27
Interpellation concerning the need for prenatal protection of the right to life of children (No. 554)

Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary session

The primary opponents are the Government of the Republic and the Ministry of Social Affairs, who are being criticized for ignoring their constitutional duty to protect and for exercising arbitrary power. The criticism is policy-driven, centering on the government's decision to fund abortion procedures, and is intense, with the situation being compared to a "terrible dystopia" and the opposing side being accused of shirking responsibility.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-27
Inquiry Concerning the Scope of Category B Driving Licences (No. 327)

Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary session

He doesn't directly criticize an opponent, but the speaker questions the current regulation which prevents the use of 125cc scooters with B category licenses. He believes that the current restriction has "absolutely no substantive reason."
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-15
Third reading of the Bill (332 SE) on the Amendment of the International Sanctions Act and the Amendment of other related Acts.

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The main opponents are the bill's supporters (including Mr. Terras) and officials from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, who are criticized for disregarding the constitution and failing to provide a risk analysis. The speaker rejects the personal attack (being labeled as pro-Kremlin) as "ugly" and accuses the opposing side of either deliberately lying or simply misunderstanding the issues. No willingness to compromise is expressed; instead, they demand that the bill be rejected.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-15
Estonian Participation in the War in Ukraine

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, press briefing

The primary confrontation is with the government, which stands accused of dragging Estonia into a war with Russia and circumventing the constitutional rights of the Riigikogu (Parliament) through the deployment of defense personnel. The criticism is intense, addressing both the substance of the policy (the risk of escalation) and procedural irregularities (the lack of a proper mandate). The speaker further criticizes the government's attempt to brand legitimate critical questioning as merely spreading Kremlin narratives.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-14
First Reading of the Riigikogu Draft Resolution "Appointment of Oliver Kask as a Justice of the Supreme Court" (424 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The opposition is aimed at the political forces that voted in favor of changing the definition of marriage in June 2023. The criticism is indirect and focuses on the potential unconstitutionality of this legislative amendment should it be overturned in the future.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-13
Inquiry Regarding the Alleged Vandalism of Andrei Shumakov's Car (No. 630)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session

The main confrontation is directed at government institutions (the minister, the Security Police Board), whose claims regarding the involvement of Russian special services are being challenged. The criticism is intense and focuses on their inability to present the public with credible facts that would support the official narrative. The speaker openly questions the competence of the authorities.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-13
Proposal by the Chancellor of Justice for bringing the Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Prevention Act, the Credit Institutions Act, the Law of Obligations Act, and the State Fees Act into conformity with the Constitution

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session

Direct opponents are not named, but the criticism is aimed at the Constitutional Committee and, more broadly, the political system, for failing to raise the fundamental question of the arbitrary refusal of banking services. The criticism targets the inadequate handling of the issue and the dismissive attitude in a situation where discrimination is obvious.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-09
Debate on the matter of significant national importance: "E-elections – a threat to democracy."

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

Strong opposition is targeting the government coalition, which is accused of denying problems and undermining trust by sweeping issues "under the rug." The criticism is both procedural and political, stressing that the coalition is exacerbating the problem (for instance, through the introduction of mobile voting) and failing to take the foundational principles of democracy seriously. The speaker argues that it is those who deny the problems, not those who bring them to light, who are undermining faith in the electoral process.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-08
Second Reading of the Draft Act on the Protection of Whistleblowers Reporting Work-Related Infringements of European Union Law (257 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session.

The primary opponents are the chairman of the session and the commission's representative (Mr. Odinets), who are sharply criticized for violating the rules of procedure and engaging in arbitrary conduct. The criticism is intense and centers on procedural unfairness, accusing the opposing party of unwillingness to vote on the proposed amendments individually.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-08
First Reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic Regarding the Imposition of a Temporary Solidarity Tax on the Banking Sector" (367 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session.

The primary opposition is directed at the governing parties, who are accused of failing to support the draft legislation due to obtaining personal financial gain. The criticism is intense and personal, implying that leading politicians and their associated persons own bank shares, resulting in a conflict of interest.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-08
Estonia-Ukraine Security Agreement

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing

The main confrontation is directed against the actions of the prime minister and the government, criticizing them for disregarding the constitution and for a lack of transparency. The criticism is intense, including a direct accusation of either making an error or attempting to lie regarding the concealment of the nature of the agreement. The opposition targets both the substance of the policy (the assumption of obligations) and the procedure (the failure to ratify).
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-07
Third Reading of the Draft Act on the Amendment of the Riigikogu Election Act and the Amendment of Other Related Acts (Bill 344 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The primary targets of opposition are the bill's proponents and the ruling government coalition, who face criticism for their arrogant disregard and slogan-driven rhetoric that completely ignores the existing crisis of trust. The critique is aimed squarely at the political culture, accusing the opposing party of flouting established rules and norms purely for "self-serving interests." No possibility of compromise is being offered; instead, the immediate halting of the process is demanded.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-06
A written motion submitted by 22 members of the Riigikogu for a vote of no confidence in the Minister of Education and Research, Kristina Kallas

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.

The main adversary is Minister of Education and Research Kristina Kallas, who is being criticized both for administrative blunders (such as IT failures in the examination system) and for her ideological stances. The criticism is intense, directly demanding the minister's resignation and calling into question the constitutionality of her positions.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-02
First Reading of the Riigikogu Draft Statement (420 AE) "On Declaring the Moscow Patriarchate an Institution Supporting the Military Aggression of the Russian Federation"

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The main adversaries are the chairman of the session and the Board of the Riigikogu (due to the timing of the procedure and the evasion of responsibility), as well as Minister of the Interior Lauri Läänemets (for the intention to forcibly dissolve the MPEÕK and the accompanying threats). The criticism is intense, accusing the opponents of outright lying and warning against the escalation of ethnic tensions.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-04-30
First Reading of the Draft Act on the Amendment of the Penal Code and the Amendment of Other Related Acts (Increasing the Fine Unit) (Bill 415 SE)

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session.

The primary target is the Minister of Justice and, more broadly, the government, who are being criticized for violating legislative drafting rules and covering the budget deficit using unpopular measures. The criticism is intense, focusing both on procedural deficiencies (such as the lack of impact analysis) and political dishonesty (like raising taxes immediately after the election). The resistance culminates in a proposal to reject the draft legislation entirely.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-04-29
Interpellation concerning the state funding of elective abortions (No. 606)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The primary adversaries are the Government of the Republic and previous administrations, who face criticism for violating a constitutional duty regarding the funding of abortions. The criticism is intense, accusing the opposition of trampling on the human rights of the most vulnerable, and drawing comparisons between the current situation and historical unjust regimes. Furthermore, colleague Karmen Joller is criticized for her lack of expertise in human rights theory.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-04-29
Inquiry regarding pressure exerted by the European Central Bank on the Basel Committee (No. 628)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The opposition is directed against the implementers of the European Union's climate policy, who are accused of blindly pursuing ideological goals without any scientific basis. The criticism is intense and focuses on the unscientific nature of the policy, demanding the evidence upon which these convictions are based.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-04-17
Second Reading of the Draft Act (344 SE) on the Amendment of the Riigikogu Election Act and Related Amendment of Other Acts

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The primary objection is aimed at the individuals or the commission overseeing the proceedings, criticizing their decisions regarding the consolidation of amendments as arbitrary and lacking standards. Criticism is also leveled at the government's stance, which dismisses the low public confidence in the electoral system, and demands that the issue be addressed seriously.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-04-17
WHO Pandemic Agreement

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, information briefing

The main confrontation is between the government and the minister, whose claims regarding the transparency of the negotiations are considered untrue. The criticism is intense and focused on procedural shortcomings, particularly the failure to inform the public and the Riigikogu, and the concealment of the draft agreements.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-04-17
Participation of the Republic of Estonia in the War in Ukraine

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, information briefing

The main opponents are the Government of the Republic, particularly Prime Minister Kaja Kallas and the Minister of Defence, who are being criticized for unconstitutional activity and for evading answers. The criticism is intense and focuses on the legality and transparency of the government's actions, as well as the conformity of the exercise of state power with the law.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-04-10
Participation of the Republic of Estonia in the War in Ukraine

15th Estonian Parliament, third sitting, information briefing

The main adversary is the government and the prime minister, who are criticized for a lack of transparency and for evading answers. The criticism targets the government's procedural actions, especially concerning the use of the Defense Forces and the signing of contracts without duly informing the Riigikogu and the public. The speaker suggests that the government may have taken steps that "could be construed as entering into war with Russia" without informing the public.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-04-08
Interpellation regarding curriculum subjects concerning human sexuality and the associated rights of parents (No. 616)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The main opponent is the Minister of Education and Research, who is being criticized on a personal and ideological level for a "deeply unscientific mindset" and "ideological blindness." The criticism is intense and uncompromising, accusing the minister of betraying the duty to protect children. The speaker demands that the minister step down if he is not prepared to take his responsibilities seriously.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-04-08
Interpellation Regarding the Need to Support Large Families (No. 339)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The opposition is directed at the government, Prime Minister Kaja Kallas, and the Minister of Social Protection, who are being asked for explanations regarding the implemented cuts and their perceived unfairness. The criticism is both political (the cuts) and procedural (the delay of the interpellation/inquiry), as well as ideological, questioning the ideological foundation of the government's family policy.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-04-08
Interpellation concerning interference in the internal affairs of Hungary (No. 570)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The main opposition is directed at the Foreign Minister (Mr. Tsahkna) for issuing directives and at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs for practicing ideological activism. The criticism is intense, accusing the government of deteriorating diplomatic relations and establishing a "pattern of ideological dictatorship" that compels diplomats to participate in ideological projects. Opponents are also criticized for their lack of dignity and for employing double standards (raising the flag only where they dare to do so).
View Profile View Agenda
2024-04-03
First Reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic for Enhancing the Exercise of Administrative Oversight over the Prosecutor's Office" (280 OE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The confrontation is aimed at coalition MPs, particularly Mr. Randpere, whose stance regarding the efficacy of the supervisory system is deemed inadequate. The criticism is intense and multi-faceted, encompassing both political procedure (the lack of oversight) and previous ideological conflicts that have damaged the working climate of the Riigikogu committee.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-04-03
The Republic of Estonia's participation in the war in Ukraine

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing

The confrontation is aimed at the government representative, whose response is considered improper and essentially unanswered. The criticism is directed at procedural inaccuracy (the mandate question) and the lack of transparency regarding Estonia's military involvement in Ukraine.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-04-02
Interpellation concerning the abuse of power by the PPA (Police and Border Guard Board) in connection with the unlawful suppression of freedom of speech and expression (No. 620)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The main adversaries are the PPA (Police and Border Guard Board) and the Minister of the Interior, who stand accused of illegal conduct, political bias, and inadequate response to court rulings. The criticism is intense, accusing the PPA of exhibiting a "serial pattern" and its officials of deliberately lying in court to justify their misconduct. Demands are being made for accountability and the minister's resignation, while ruling out any compromise that would justify the PPA's actions.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-04-01
Interpellation concerning men of mobilization age from Ukraine in Estonia (No. 619)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The standoff is aimed at the minister, who is being criticized for ignoring a substantive response and from whom an explanation is demanded regarding allegedly inaccurate factual claims concerning Ukrainian documents. The criticism is both procedural and fact-based.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-04-01
Interpellation Regarding Mass Immigration (No. 617)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The main adversary is the "government," which is fiercely criticized for its immigration policy—a policy aimed at exacerbating demographic problems. The criticism is political and centers on the illogical nature and negative consequences of the government's actions.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-04-01
Interpellation to the Government of the Republic concerning plans to increase immigration (No. 614)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The primary adversary is the Government of the Republic and its immigration policy, which is explicitly aimed at increasing immigration. The criticism is intense and focused purely on policy, accusing the government of implementing illogical measures that exacerbate existing demographic issues. There is no sign of a willingness to compromise; rather, the demand is that the government must admit its policy has failed.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-04-01
Interpellation Concerning the Undermining of the State's Foundations (No. 523)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The main opponent is Prime Minister Kaja Kallas and the government coalition led by the Reform Party. The criticism is extremely intense and sharp, accusing the opposing side of concealing their political intentions, fast-tracking the law, and knowingly lying. The opponent's views are considered ridiculous and inadequate, ruling out any possibility of compromise on this issue.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-03-20
First reading of the Draft Act amending the Riigikogu Member's Status Act (339 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The opposition is directed at a system that permits salary increases during a deep economic recession, deeming this practice unfair. On a personal level, a direct challenge is being issued to Mr. Keldo, demanding clarification regarding his claims about the use of expense reimbursements (various videos), while simultaneously defending the acceptability of one's own actions.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-03-20
First Reading of the Draft Act amending the Riigikogu Election Act, the Local Government Council Election Act, and the European Parliament Election Act (292 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The main opponents are the Reform Party and government officials, who are criticized for defending the e-voting system while ignoring constitutional issues and expert criticism. The criticism targets political will and procedural irresponsibility, noting that trust ultimately rests on the "internal conviction of a handful of officials." The speaker also criticizes the Supreme Court for being overly vague and failing to provide a direct assessment, and draws parallels between the e-elections in Estonia and Russia.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-03-18
Inquiry concerning the justification of the activities of the Prosecutor's Office and the Security Police Board (KaPo) (No. 528)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The primary targets of criticism are the Prosecutor’s Office and the Internal Security Service (KAPO), who stand accused of exhibiting characteristics of abuse of authority and legal transgressions (e.g., obstructing communication with a lawyer). The criticism is aimed at the systemic lack of accountability among officials, rather than being directed primarily at political opponents. The intensity of these attacks is high because this lack of accountability is viewed as a violation of the principles of the rule of law.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-03-18
Interpellation concerning problems related to the restriction on official actions (No. 320)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The main criticism is directed against the inaction of the Ministry of Justice and the government, ironically questioning what the ministry actually does if they cannot even sort out such a simple matter. An especially sharp procedural and ethical attack targets the Prosecutor’s Office, which is accused of filing baseless charges based on vague standards. The speaker demands that prosecutors be held accountable and lose their jobs if their unfounded accusations ruin people’s lives over an eight-year period.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-03-13
First reading of the Draft Decision of the Riigikogu (322 OE) "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic to Prepare a Comprehensive National Defence Development Vision Extending up to the Year 2045 and a New Extraordinary National Defence Development Plan Deriving from It, Extending up to the Year 2034"

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting.

The primary criticism is aimed at the Commander of the Defense Forces, Martin Herem, whose positions are considered baffling and mere "boasting." The criticism is intense and centers on the divergence between political rhetoric and actual capability (specifically, the ammunition shortfall). The opposition targets the official, overly optimistic assessments of the nation's defense readiness.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-03-13
First Reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic for Increasing the Birth Rate of the Estonian People" (283 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting.

The primary adversary is the ruling coalition, which faces intense criticism for both its political moves (the elimination of subsidies, tax breaks) and its value-based actions (the distortion of the definition of marriage). The criticism is extensive and accusatory, highlighting the government's anti-family agenda.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-03-13
First Reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic to Lower the Value Added Tax on Foodstuffs and Medicines to 5 Percent" (272 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting.

The opposition is aimed at the government leaders (the Minister of Finance and the Prime Minister), criticizing their stance that lowering the VAT is pointless because entrepreneurs will simply raise prices. The criticism is policy-driven, focusing on the government’s alleged inability or unwillingness to mitigate market risks.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-03-13
Participation of the Defense Forces in the War in Ukraine

15th Estonian Parliament, third sitting, information briefing

The main target is the Prime Minister and the government, who are sharply criticized both for their policy (the risk of dragging Estonia into war) and their procedure (demagogic evasion of answers). The intensity of the criticism is high, accusing the Prime Minister of avoiding responsibility and potentially abandoning the people in the event of war. The chair of the session is also criticized for failing to force the Prime Minister to answer questions.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-03-12
First Reading of the Draft Act Amending the Local Government Organization Act (Bill 289 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd plenary sitting

The primary opponents are the Riigikogu majority and the coalition, who are sharply criticized for opposing democratic governance. The criticism is fundamental and intense, claiming that the majority is killing the bill because they do not want the will of the people to interfere with the implementation of their predetermined political agenda. The electoral system is also criticized (nationwide lists, the lack of transparency in e-voting) as a factor hindering the realization of the people's will.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-03-11
Interpellation concerning Estonia's critical demographic situation (No. 597)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session

The main opponent is Prime Minister Kaja Kallas and the government as a whole, who are accused of systematic micromanagement and restricting civil liberties. The criticism is both political (cutting subsidies, unreasonable expenditures) and personal/procedural (lying, lack of vision, incompetence). The government is accused of continuous attempts to dictate how people should live, covering everything from cars and housing to vaccination.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-03-06
The Prime Minister's Messages

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, press briefing

The primary targets of criticism are the prime minister and the government, who stand accused of increasing the risk of dragging the country into war and evading questions. Strong criticism is also directed at the presiding officer of the session, who is accused of protecting a coalition partner and disregarding parliamentary procedure.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-03-05
2024 Report by the Minister of Education and Research on the Implementation of the State's Long-Term Development Strategy "Eesti 2035" (Education Reforms)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The opposition is aimed at the Minister of Education's reform plans concerning the closure of rural schools and the reorganization of the upper secondary school network. The criticism is policy-driven, focusing on the unfair burden the state is imposing on children in rural areas. The intensity of the attack is high, featuring accusations of violating equal treatment and establishing forced servitude.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-03-04
Interpellation concerning the ensuring of so-called marriage equality and the natural rights of children (No. 324)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The main adversary is the "ruling coalition," which is criticized for destroying the concept of marriage and employing the rhetoric of marriage equality. The criticism is intense and centers on the logical inconsistency and selectivity of the government's approach, given that they are not extending marriage rights to relatives or to groups of more than two people. The possibility of compromise is not mentioned; instead, the government's rationality is being challenged.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-03-04
Inquiry regarding the promotion of gender equality and equal treatment in private and family life (No. 268)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The main opponent is the minister and the ideology he represents, which is described as "perverted" and detached from reality. The criticism is fundamental and philosophical, attacking the opposing side’s entire worldview, not just specific political details. Compromise is ruled out because the speaker asserts that only one way of thinking is correct.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-03-04
Interpellation concerning the impact of the motor vehicle tax (No. 610)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The main confrontation is directed against the minister and the government, who introduced the motor vehicle tax bill. The criticism is policy-based (unreasonableness) and legal (discrimination), and it is presented in the form of a direct and sharp question.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-03-04
Inquiry Concerning the Taxation of Residential Land (No. 527)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The main opponent is the Reform Party and the government, who are being sharply criticized for their ideological shift and the introduction of wealth taxes. The criticism is principled, accusing the party of betraying liberal tenets and the inviolability of private property. The opposition is intense, with people directly asking if there is still any hope for a reversal.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-03-04
Interpellation concerning the introduction of the vehicle tax (No. 304)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The main opponent is the minister, whose rhetoric regarding freedom of choice is considered inappropriate and hollow. The criticism is intense, focusing on political insincerity and the government's inability to account for the reality of rural areas. The opposition exists on two levels: policy (the substance of the tax) and credibility (the minister's claims about their supporters).
View Profile View Agenda
2024-03-04
Interpellation concerning the rise in the cost of living in Estonia (No. 599)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The opposition is directed at the government representative, whose statements are considered contradictory and ambiguous. The criticism is rhetorical and narrative-driven, calling into question the opponent's ability to adequately assess the situation and describe it honestly. The intensity of the attack is moderate, focusing on logical inconsistency.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-03-04
Interpellation Regarding the Temporary Taxation of Banks' Excess Profits (No. 595)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The confrontation with the ruling coalition is extremely intense and unequivocal. They are being accused of failing to act according to their oath of office, instead serving the interests of the banks. The criticism is rooted in policy and values, alleging that the government is protecting the banks from plundering the people, and calling for the government to be ousted.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-02-21
First Reading of the Draft Law on the Denunciation of the Agreement between the Republic of Estonia and the Russian Federation on Legal Assistance and Legal Relations in Civil, Family, and Criminal Matters (362 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

Not enough data
View Profile View Agenda
2024-02-21
Immigration

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing

The main criticism is directed against the presiding officer of the session, who is accused of bias and favoring coalition partners. The criticism is procedural, demanding that the chair reprimand coalition members in the same manner as the opposition when they stray from the topic or fail to answer questions. The intensity of the attack is strong, demanding an immediate change in conduct.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-02-21
A campaign spreading fear of war on the streets of Tallinn

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing

The main opponent is the government and the structures operating under its authority, which are accused of achieving political objectives through fearmongering. The criticism is intense and alleges unethical behavior, drawing comparisons to previous patterns of political mobilization, and the official explanation regarding "independent artists" is dismissed.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-02-15
Debate on the matter of national importance initiated by the Isamaa faction, titled "Estonia in Economic Recession. What is to be done?"

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The confrontation is aimed directly at the "current government," which is being accused of implementing tax changes and overregulation that stifle competition. The criticism is intense and policy-driven, expressing the conviction that the government is failing to consider any significant proposals. The speaker sees no prospect whatsoever of the government improving the situation.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-02-13
Debate on Foreign Policy as an Issue of Significant National Importance, initiated by the Foreign Affairs Committee

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session

The opposition’s stance is aimed at the government, criticizing the consistency of its foreign policy and its decisions regarding the maintenance of troops in Iraq. The criticism is rooted in both policy and values, demanding that the government engage in critical self-reflection.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-02-07
First Reading of the Draft Act Amending the Study Allowances and Study Loans Act (288 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting.

There is no direct criticism of opponents or political groups. The focus is on the substantive analysis of policy and the assessment of educational outcomes.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-02-05
Interpellation regarding the abolition of the special VAT rate for accommodation establishments (No. 289)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting

The opposition is directed against the government's tax policy, directly criticizing the justification and logic behind the implementation of the new VAT rates, which deviates from previous practice. The criticism is policy-based and focuses on the government's inability to explain why the VAT for accommodation establishments rose to 14%, rather than 11% (half of 22%).
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-25
First Reading of the Draft Act Amending the Atmospheric Air Protection Act (160 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The confrontation is aimed primarily at the majority of the parliamentary committee, who decided to reject the draft legislation during the first reading. The criticism is both procedural and political, accusing the committee of dismissing the public’s concern as a "pseudo-problem" and refusing to involve experts and stakeholders.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-24
First Reading of the Bill on Amendments to the Language Act (161 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The criticism is directed at the state authorities who have essentially abandoned the idea of the nation-state, a stance that is hindering the enactment of the law. Questions are also being raised regarding potential principled opposition among coalition MPs who may not support strengthening the status of the Estonian language.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-24
Review of the Implementation of the "Fundamentals of Legislation Policy until 2030" in 2022

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The primary adversary is the Government of the Republic, particularly the Reform Party-led administration, which faces sharp criticism for systemic procedural violations. This critique focuses on the government's unwillingness to adhere to best practices in lawmaking and its failure to fulfill the requirement for constitutional review. A concrete example cited is the rapid adoption of the bill amending the Family Law, which bypassed established procedural rules.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-24
The forced departure of the MPEÕK Metropolitan from Estonia

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing

The primary opposition is aimed at the state authorities (the Police and Border Guard Board, the Internal Security Service, and the Prime Minister), who made the decision not to extend Metropolitan Eugene’s residence permit. Criticism focuses on the political wisdom and legal foundation of the decision, accusing the government of deliberately escalating tensions with Russia. He publicly challenges the security agencies' claims that Eugene supports the aggressor.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-23
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Medicines Act (Bill 162 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The criticism is aimed at both officials and politicians who fail to pay extensive attention to serious risks and allow for the absence of public debate on crucial issues. The criticism is both substantive and procedural, focusing on their inaction.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-23
Overview of the state of Research and Development and government policy in this field.

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

Criticism is aimed at the official tax burden data (33%), calling into question their validity and methodology. The opposition is policy-driven and intense, relying on conflicting calculations that also factor in indirect taxes such as VAT and excises.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-22
Interpellation concerning the taxation of the populace through inflation (No. 317)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The primary confrontation is directed against the Government of the Republic and the Minister of Finance, criticizing their inaction in protecting the public's assets from price inflation. The criticism is policy-driven, focusing on the government's inability to cope with potential financial crises and its disregard for inflation as a problem of asset expropriation.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-22
Inquiry Concerning the Imposition of the Motor Vehicle Tax (No. 310)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The primary criticism is directed at the government faction and ministers who preach abstinence from car usage but fail to lead by example. The criticism is behavioral, focusing on political hypocrisy and casting doubt on the credibility of the government's program.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-22
Interpellation concerning the underfunding of state infrastructure (No. 334)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The confrontation is directed at a government representative whose claim regarding the necessity of Rail Baltic freight transport is deemed untrue. The criticism is intense and substantive, focusing on the discrepancies between the data and justifications presented by the government and the opinions of experts.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-22
Interpellation concerning the environmental impact of mandatory building renovation and citizens' ability to pay (No. 123)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The main opponents are the government (the Reform Party, which is accused of abandoning liberal principles) and the European Union, which is viewed as imposing totalitarian dictates. The criticism is intense and value-based, accusing the government of disregarding people’s ability to pay and sugarcoating the mandatory renovation requirement. Reference is also made to the position of the Tallinn Administrative Court regarding mandatory vaccination, in order to strengthen the parallel with mandatory renovation.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-16
First Reading of the Draft Act Amending the Public Prosecutor's Office Act (105 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

Strongly critical of the government and the coalition, he/she accuses them of failing to implement the principle of accountability and avoiding substantive debate. The criticism is directed both at political inaction and procedural conduct (voting down draft legislation without providing justification). He/She challenges the government's position that the bill violates the principle of separation of powers, arguing that oversight is already provided for in the law.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-15
Inquiry concerning the misappropriation of "Slava Ukraini" funds and the related investigation (No. 578)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.

The primary criticism is aimed at the minister and the agencies handling the investigation, who are accused of dragging out the proceedings and potentially covering up the matter. The criticism is intense and focuses on procedural shortcomings and inaction.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-15
Interpellation regarding the necessity and construction of Rail Baltic (No. 262)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.

The confrontation is aimed at the actions of the Prime Minister and the government, criticizing their failure to secure funding for the Rail Baltic project. The criticism is rooted in both policy and procedure, highlighting the potential cost burden falling on the taxpayer and demanding a 100% guarantee.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-15
Interpellation concerning the demographic crisis and its resolution (No. 232)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.

The main opponent is the government and the prime minister, who are criticized both for specific anti-family political decisions (the withdrawal of benefits, changing the meaning of marriage) and for ignoring the demographic crisis. The criticism is intense and accusatory, emphasizing that the government absolutely lacks any vision or the will to solve the problem. The speaker also criticizes the quality of the prime minister's response, calling it embarrassing and clearly written by officials.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-15
Inquiry on Immigration (No. 133)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.

The primary criticism is aimed at the Prime Minister and the government, accusing them of inaction, avoiding providing answers, and disregarding Ukraine’s interests. The attacks are intense and focus on political unwillingness ("they can, but they won't") as well as potential cynicism, suggesting the government is prioritizing its own interests over assisting Ukraine. The criticism is policy- and procedure-based.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-11
First reading of the Bill for the Amendment of the Vital Statistics Registration Act (106 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The primary criticism is leveled against the coalition and ministries, which are accused of maintaining ideologically motivated and unreasonable regulations that degrade mothers. He/She sharply criticizes the Riigikogu (Parliament) practice of systematically rejecting opposition bills, regardless of their intrinsic merit. He/She views objections regarding the danger of human trafficking as a contrived excuse rather than a genuine problem in Estonia.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-10
First Reading of the Bill on Amendments to the Value-Added Tax Act (240 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

There is not enough data.
View Profile View Agenda
Back to Profiling