By Agendas: Kalle Grünthal

Total Agendas: 217

Fully Profiled: 217

2025-10-15
First Reading of the Draft Act amending the Protection of Ambient Air Act and other Acts (Transposition of Amendments to the Renewable Energy Directive) (697 SE)

The 15th Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting

The primary opponent is the Minister and the government, whose positions are being intensely criticized because they rely on outdated (15-year-old) and inadequate research. The criticism is both policy- and evidence-based, challenging the credibility of the official conclusions and issuing a direct challenge over the disregard for WHO guidance.
2025-10-15
First Reading of the Draft Act Amending the Law on the Election of the President of the Republic (684 SE)

The 15th Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting

The opposition is directed at the current legislative solution, which maintains a small electoral college. The criticism is procedural, emphasizing that the system allows coalition figures dominating the local councils to shape the presidential selection. The speaker strongly refutes the argument that increasing the number of electors is impossible.
2025-10-08
Third reading of the Draft Act supplementing the Police and Border Guard Act (670 SE)

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The main criticism is directed at Andre Hanimägi and his emotional speech, which is considered legally incompetent and revolutionary. The opposition is intense and focuses on the unconstitutionality of the draft bill, broadly accusing the government of disregarding the constitution. The criticism targets both the policy itself and the competence of the opposing representative.
2025-10-08
2025 Report by the Minister of Social Affairs on the Implementation of the National Long-Term Development Strategy "Estonia 2035"

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The primary parties being criticized are the Ministry (for maintaining the monopoly), general practitioners, and pharmaceutical manufacturers/wholesalers (for establishing a system based on conflicts of interest and profiteering). The criticism is intense and focuses on systemic unethical behavior and corrupt practices.
2025-10-07
First Reading of the 2026 State Budget Bill (737 SE)

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

Fierce opposition is directed at the government's budget policy and priorities, criticizing the preference given to officials over recipients of subsistence benefits. Criticism is also aimed at Minister Joller for presenting inaccurate data regarding the subsistence benefit figures. The resistance exists both at the policy and procedural levels, demanding that the chair strictly enforce order.
2025-10-06
First reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Motor Vehicle Tax Act (694 SE)

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The main opponent is the governing coalition, specifically Finance Minister Jürgen Ligi, who is accused of adopting the party's ideology as a former communist. The criticism is intense and ideological, accusing the opponents of pursuing Soviet communist policies and working against the will of the Estonian people.
2025-09-24
Second reading of the draft law amending the Police and Border Guard Act (670 SE)

Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.

The main opponents are Andre Hanimägi, who has been dubbed a "proponent of the digital concentration camp," along with the Social Democrats and the coalition supporting the bill. The criticism is intense and substantive, accusing the opponents of violating the constitution, supporting illegal surveillance, and disregarding personal data protection requirements. The speaker shows no willingness to compromise.
2025-09-24
First reading of the draft resolution of the Riigikogu "Proposal to the Republic of Estonia's Government to abandon the implementation of the Rail Baltic project in Estonia and to withdraw from all international agreements related to the project" (650 OE)

Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.

The opposition is aimed at the initiators of the Rail Baltic project, who are accused of flawed economic calculations and causing damage to the state. There is also sharp criticism of the government's actions and the implementation of the European Union's decision-making procedure, which has led to the unconstitutional surrender of decision-making power.
2025-09-23
Draft Law Amending the Waste Act (676 SE) – First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 6th session, plenary session

The criticism is directed against major producers (battery and accumulator manufacturers), who are accused of creating a monopoly at the expense of consumers. Procedurally, the Riigikogu Board is criticized for unreasonable scheduling of working hours, and the Reform Party is criticized for opposing the Centre Party's proposed agenda. The criticism is sharp and grounded in both policy and procedure.
2025-09-23
Draft law amending the Act on Population Status Proceedings, the Population Register Act, and the State Duty Act (687 SE) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 6th session, plenary session

The opposition is directed at the bill's supporters, who advocate for simplified procedures, such as using standard mail when reporting a change of residence. The criticism is intense and procedural, focusing on deficiencies in ensuring security and identity verification, particularly concerning standard mail.
2025-09-23
Open mic

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session

The main opponents are the Reform Party, Prime Minister Kaja Kallas, and the government as a whole, who are accused of taxing the populace and engaging in manipulation. He sharply criticizes President Alar Karis for warmongering due to his promotion of the use of long-range weapons. Furthermore, he criticizes polling firms (Norstat) for falsifying ratings and manipulating them according to the client's wishes.
2025-09-17
Second reading of the draft law amending the Emergency Situations Act and other laws (662 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting.

The opposition is directed at the speed and schedule of handling draft bill 662 SE, criticizing the procedural quality. The criticism targets the process implementers, as they are pushing through measures without a detailed overview.
2025-09-17
Re-examination of the Act Amending the Act Preventing Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing and the Act on International Sanctions (640 UA), which was not announced by the President of the Republic

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting.

The primary opponents are the government and its coalition partners, who stand accused of preparing unconstitutional actions and inciting criminal activity. The Social Democrats (Riina Sikkut) are being criticized for legitimizing the surveillance of citizens, which the speaker considers a hallmark of totalitarianism. The criticism is intense and fundamental, precluding any compromise in the struggle against the proposed model for establishing a surveillance society.
2025-09-17
Re-examination of the Act Amending the Act on Churches and Religious Communities (570 UA) Not Proclaimed by the President of the Republic

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting.

The main opponents are the Riigikogu committees (the Legal Affairs Committee and the Constitutional Committee) and their members, who are accused of lacking professional knowledge and being incompetent. The criticism is both procedural and competence-based, claiming that the committees made decisions "on a whim" and only listened to the opinion of the government representative. The speaker calls such a procedure an "outrage" and doubts the committees' ability to provide a commensurate response to the president's legal assessment.
2025-09-16
The Chancellor of Justice's report on the conformity of legislative acts with the Constitution and the performance of other duties assigned to the Chancellor by law.

Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.

The criticism is aimed at various government agencies that were rummaging through the sensitive personal data of Estonian citizens and subsequently failed to hold anyone accountable. The opposition is strong and centers on procedural and legal failures, particularly the lack of sanctions for this unauthorized snooping.
2025-09-10
A written request for a vote of no confidence in Social Minister Karmen Joller, submitted by 21 members of the Riigikogu.

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session

The main opponent is Minister of Social Affairs Karmen Joller, who is being accused of concealing the truth and refusing dialogue. The criticism is intense and direct, accusing the minister of not telling the truth regarding the content of medicine package inserts. The opposition has culminated in a public challenge to a debate to determine "who will prevail."
2025-09-10
Information session

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, press briefing

The criticism targets the procedure and the absence of Members of Parliament, calling into question the figures presented by the session chair and the parliament's ability to function. This is a procedural rather than a political attack against a specific opposition party.
2025-09-09
The Minister of Defence's 2025 presentation on the implementation of the state's long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035"

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session.

The primary criticism is aimed at the actions taken by the Ministry of Defence and the government regarding the safeguarding of national security. The criticism is intense and centers on the political failure to detect drones, which sets the stage for the emergence of a Russia-backed internal threat.
2025-09-04
Chair implementation

15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu

The main opponents are the Board of the Riigikogu and the presiding officers of the sessions, who are consistently accused of violating the rules of procedure and internal order, as well as disregarding the law. Government members (including Kristen Michal, Margus Tsahkna) are publicly criticized for lying, deceiving the public, and concluding unconstitutional agreements. The criticism is intense and often personal, accusing opponents of "playing with fire" and displaying "boorish" behavior.
2025-06-19
Draft law amending the Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Prevention Act and the International Sanctions Act (640 SE) – third reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The criticism is directed at the Riigikogu and the initiators of the bill, accusing them of adopting unconstitutional laws and utilizing the expedited procedure. It refers to previous instances where the Chancellor of Justice and the President returned legislation, emphasizing the lack of procedural quality.
2025-06-17
Draft law amending the Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Prevention Act and the International Sanctions Act (640 SE) - second reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session

The main opponents are the bill’s presenters and supporters, represented by Urmas Reinsalu and Maris Lauri, whose assertions regarding the absence of totalitarianism are being directly disputed. The criticism is intense and principled, labeling the draft legislation as illegal surveillance and a characteristic of a totalitarian society. No willingness to compromise has been expressed; the objective is to vote the bill down.
2025-06-16
Draft law amending the Waste Act and, in consequence, amending other laws (657 SE) – first reading

XV Riigikogu, V Session, Plenary Sitting

The primary opposition is directed towards the minister or government that introduced the draft bill, criticizing their assumptions regarding the behavior and financial standing of local authorities. The criticism is focused on policy and procedure, demanding additional safeguards in the legislation, as municipalities might fail to grant exemptions due to financial constraints.
2025-06-11
Draft law amending the Church and Religious Communities Act (570 UA) – second reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The principal adversaries are the coalition deputies and the rapporteur, who are criticized for pushing through unconstitutional draft bills, ignoring the President's position, and engaging in poor lawmaking ("flawed output"). The criticism is intense and focuses on procedural deficiencies and the violation of the principles of the rule of law. The opposition is absolute, demanding the termination of the bill's reading.
2025-06-11
Draft law amending the simplified taxation act for entrepreneurs and the income tax act, and repealing the security tax act – second reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The primary target is the government and the Minister of Finance, who are being sharply criticized for economic illiteracy and outright malice. The criticism is intense, ranging from the substance of their policies to personal accusations, and hints at the necessity of sweeping the ruling clique out of power.
2025-06-10
The Chairman of the Supreme Court’s overview of court orders, the administration of justice, and the uniform application of laws.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.

The primary criticism is aimed at the ruling coalition, which stands accused of ramming legislation through and ignoring procedural violations highlighted by the opposition. The criticism is intense and centers on procedural violations that have resulted in unconstitutional situations, necessitating the intervention of the Chancellor of Justice and the President.
2025-06-09
Inquiry regarding a network of number plate recognition cameras and the associated database (no. 756)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The main opponents are Prime Minister Kristen Michal, who is accused of giving vague answers, and the law enforcement agencies (the Police and Border Guard Board, the Prosecutor’s Office). The criticism is intense and is based primarily on procedural and legal violations, accusing them of the illegal exercise of state oversight. Compromise is ruled out because they are demanding the initiation of a criminal case against the guilty parties ("a wolf does not prey on a wolf").
2025-06-04
Draft law amending the Public Health Act (617 SE) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The main opponents are those who are obstructing the processing of the draft legislation on procedural grounds, citing European Union directives. Criticism is aimed at the actions of the Reform Party (Mr. Lees) and officials (representatives of ministries) who prioritize Brussels' mandates over public health. The speaker also criticizes the authority granted to the Committee on European Union Affairs regarding the approval of directives, deeming it unconstitutional.
2025-06-04
Draft law amending the State Audit Act, the Political Parties Act, and other laws (control body for political party funding) – first reading.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The confrontation is aimed at the current ERJK system, which is considered partisan and incompetent. The speaker poses sharp questions to the opposition (EKRE), suspecting them of political revenge and initiating proceedings against undesirable individuals. The criticism is directed at procedural injustice and political manipulation.
2025-06-04
Draft law amending the Environmental Levies Act (615 SE) – First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The primary targets of criticism are the state supervisory authorities (the Health Board, the ministry) for incompetent activity, which is evident in the lack of methodology and poor-quality measurement results. Criticism is also directed at developers who disseminate misinformation that "everything is fine," despite the state's lack of awareness. The criticism is intense and focuses on procedural and knowledge-based deficiencies.
2025-06-04
Draft law (642 SE) on the withdrawal from the convention prohibiting the use, stockpiling, production and transfer of anti-personnel mines and requiring their destruction – second reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The primary opponents are the supporters of draft law 642 SE and the military command, who are being criticized for operating "in the spirit of last century's wars." The criticism is intense and conceptual, arguing that the opposing side's arguments regarding mine removal are "complete rubbish." The speaker categorically rejects the assertion that mines are the sole means of defense or that a minefield can hold the front line.
2025-06-04
The role of the Estonian language in public space

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing

The main confrontation is directed against the minister and the government, who are being criticized for presenting inaccurate information and for the inadequate enforcement of the Language Act. The criticism is intense, accusing them of underestimating the seriousness of the situation and even pointing to corruption in the issuance of language certificates. No willingness to compromise is evident in this rhetoric.
2025-06-03
The Minister of Public Administration's 2025 presentation on the implementation of the state's long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035"

Fifteenth Riigikogu, fifth session, plenary session

The confrontation is directed at the presenter's vague and overly positive presentation, criticizing the lack of transparency regarding Rail Baltic's ownership structure. The criticism is intense and demands the immediate presentation of facts to prevent the submission of inaccurate data.
2025-04-24
Debate on the nationally significant issue "The Drawbacks of Wind Power," initiated by the faction of the Estonian Conservative People's Party.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The criticism is directed against the inaction of the government and the ministry, particularly concerning insufficient state control and a lack of knowledge regarding the harmfulness of harmful agents. The objection is procedural, citing the absence of necessary equipment, accredited personnel, and calibrated apparatuses required for conducting measurements. Furthermore, the concealment of information regarding WHO guidelines is also being criticized.
2025-04-23
Second reading of the draft law amending the Electricity Market Act (555 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The main opponents are the Reform Party government, Prime Minister Kristen Michal, and Minister Erkki Keldo, who are accused of selling off state resources and carrying out Brussels' orders. The criticism is intense, accusing the government of treating the populace as "ballast" that needs to be discarded. Compromise is ruled out, as the speaker is calling for resistance against the government's "brutality."
2025-04-23
Draft law (583 SE) for the second reading on accession to the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women and approval of amendment to Article 20(1) of the Convention.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The primary adversary is the ruling coalition, particularly the Reform Party, which faces intense criticism both for steamrolling the opposition and for its socio-political decisions (the reduction of child benefits). The criticism is intense and policy-based, with the aim of calling the government to order using an international mechanism. No willingness to compromise is being expressed; instead, new methods of obstruction are being sought.
2025-04-22
Draft law amending the Act on Obligations and, consequently, other laws (613 SE) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The criticism is directed at the rapporteur of the draft bill and the content of the legislation itself, which grants excessive discretionary power. The opposition is intense and principled, as the speaker sees a danger in individuals being treated differently depending on whether they are considered an "unpleasant person." The criticism targets both the procedural and substantive deficiencies of the law.
2025-04-15
Draft law amending the Public Transport Act (578 SE) - First Reading

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.

The strongest criticism is directed at the platform service provider Bolt, who is accused of aggressive lobbying and aiming to achieve a monopoly in the market by squeezing out traditional taxis. The position of the Government of the Republic is also criticized for rejecting the draft bill using unsubstantiated and flimsy justifications.
2025-04-10
The Chancellor of Justice's proposal to align the Motor Vehicle Tax Act and the Road Traffic Act with the Basic Law.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The opposition is targeting coalition MPs, accusing them of hypocrisy, following orders, and adopting unconstitutional legislation. The criticism is highly intense, claiming the coalition is carrying out someone else's orders and ignoring the will of the Estonian people. The speaker is demanding the dissolution of the Riigikogu and the holding of snap elections.
2025-04-09
The first reading of the draft resolution (569 OE) of the Riigikogu, "Proposal to the Government of the Republic to temporarily suspend the processing of all planning procedures related to wind farms, with a deferral until the establishment of an up-to-date methodology for infrasound measurements and the setting of limit values for sound pressure levels."

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session

The main opponents are the coalition parties (the Reform Party and Eesti 200), who are being criticized for their procedurally low attendance at the hearing. Furthermore, representatives of the ministry and "so-called experts" are being criticized for their lack of knowledge and incompetence when assessing the safety of infrasound.
2025-04-09
Draft law amending the Income Tax Act (566 SE) – First Reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session

The main critics are the bill's rapporteur and the coalition members, who are being criticized for their inability to present a clear and comprehensible justification for the necessity of the draft law. The criticism is aimed at the inadequacy and complexity of the bill's rationale, indicating both procedural and substantive opposition.
2025-04-09
Continuation of the first reading of the draft law on declaring the Motor Vehicle Tax Act invalid (592 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session

The confrontation is directed against the government coalition and the members of the committee who were responsible for the constitutionality of the motor vehicle tax bill. The criticism is intense and procedural, demanding to know by name who assumed responsibility for the absence of a constitutional infringement.
2025-04-08
Draft law on declaring the Motor Vehicle Tax Act invalid (592 SE) - first reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The criticism is aimed at the proponents of the car tax, focusing strictly on procedural deficiencies, specifically the lack of a legislative intent document and an impact assessment. The opposition is intense and uncompromising, as the objective is to halt the taxation and challenge the law in the Supreme Court.
2025-03-27
Board elections of the Riigikogu

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

Insufficient data.
2025-03-26
Security

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing

The opposition is aimed at government ministers (specifically three individuals) suspected of providing false testimony before parliament. The criticism is both procedural and ethical, underscoring the necessity of legal accountability, given that they do not possess parliamentary immunity.
2025-03-25
First reading of the draft law amending the Whistleblower Protection Act on Breaches of European Union Law and the Act on International Sanctions (EU restrictive measures directive) (584 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The primary criticism is aimed at the bill's proponent (Liisa) and the substance of the bill itself, which is viewed as detrimental to Estonian sovereignty. The critique is both procedural (citing the inadequacy of the explanatory memorandum) and substantive, accusing the opposing side of obfuscation and talking in circles. The opposition is intense and uncompromising, going so far as to use comparisons to the Soviet Union to delegitimize the policy.
2025-03-24
Draft law amending the Electricity Market Act (568 SE) - First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session.

It opposes the government's priorities, criticizing the support for building wind farms instead of national defense at a time when the government claims that money is tight. Opponents are accused of prioritizing the interests of foreign companies over national security.
2025-03-19
Draft law amending the Defence Service Act (563 SE) - first reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The strong opposition is directed at the Reform Party government and Defense Minister Hanno Pevkur, who stand accused of eight years of inaction and neglecting the human resources vital for national defense. The criticism is twofold: policy-based (insufficient armament acquisition, failure to increase compensation) and procedural (postponing the resolution until 2026). The speaker also criticized the Ministry of Finance for its "arrogant" attitude when demanding sources of funding.
2025-03-18
Draft law amending the Political Parties Act and the Credit Institutions Act (585 SE) – first reading

Fifteenth Riigikogu, fifth sitting, plenary session

The primary opposition is aimed at the Government of the Republic and a specific minister, who faces criticism both personally (accused of megalomania) and procedurally (for violating legislative regulations and exceeding their legal authority). The criticism is intense and uncompromising, demanding the suspension of the legislative process until the minister complies and procedural rules are adhered to. Separately, there is criticism regarding the insufficient involvement of political parties during the preparation of the draft bill.
2025-03-18
Draft law amending the Aliens Act and, in consequence thereof, amending other laws (to improve migration proceedings) – second reading

Fifteenth Riigikogu, fifth sitting, plenary session

The main opponents are the bill's presenter, who is accused of lacking knowledge, and members of the government (Madis Timpson, Kristen Michal). They are sharply criticized for shifting responsibility concerning Estonia's natural population increase (iibe), which highlights dissatisfaction with the government's inaction in social policy.
2025-03-17
Inquiry regarding the third year of record-low birth rates in Estonia (no. 703)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

There is not enough data.
2025-03-13
First reading of the draft resolution "Establishment of a Riigikogu investigative committee to assess the risks associated with modified mRNA COVID-19 vaccines" (557 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session

The primary targets are specific politicians (Irja Lutsar, Tanel Kiik), who are being pressed for answers regarding the safety and scientific basis of the vaccines. The criticism is intense, ranging from the political sphere to accusations of unethical and potentially criminal activity. There is no sign of willingness to compromise, as the entire objective of the vaccination project is being called into question.
2025-03-12
Draft law amending the Rules of Procedure Act of the Riigikogu (552 SE) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session

The main criticism is directed at the Constitutional Committee, which is accused of engaging in political games and disregarding constitutional values. The opposition is intense and centers on procedural unfairness, claiming that the committee ensures only the questions necessary for them are put forward.
2025-02-27
A written request from 21 members of the Riigikogu expressing a vote of no confidence in Climate Minister Yoko Alender.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The primary confrontation is with Climate Minister Yoko Alender, who is being criticized both for her policies (specifically, ignoring health impacts) and for her personal conduct (she is accused of lying). The criticism is intense and also encompasses the actions of the session chair for disregarding procedural rules. The opponent’s behavior is deemed reckless and dishonest.
2025-02-26
Draft Law on the Organisation of Research and Development and Innovation (554 SE) - First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The main criticism is directed at the actions of the minister and the government, accusing them of evading answers and avoiding uncomfortable topics. The criticism is intense and addresses both the political substance (the banning of alternative scientific analyses) and procedural conduct (the demand to recall the minister to the podium).
2025-02-26
Draft law amending the Hunting Act (567 SE) – First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The criticism is aimed more at strict legal formalism and the working practices of the Riigikogu (Parliament), which can effectively kill a good idea (like solving the wolf problem). The speaker is opposed to the procedural inflexibility that prevents a draft bill from being refined and improved, even when flaws are identified.
2025-02-25
Draft law amending the Constitution of the Republic of Estonia (536 SE) – second reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The main confrontation is directed against the bill's rapporteur (Mr. Terras) and its supporters, who are accused of wasting parliamentary time and engaging in inappropriate behavior ("playing the fool"). The criticism is both personal (a contradiction between appearance and substance) and procedural (a refusal to provide explanations). The bill itself is branded as "legally unfit," "dangerous, and stupid."
2025-02-19
Draft law amending the Church and Religious Communities Act (570 SE) – First Reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary sitting

The primary opponent is Interior Minister Lauri Läänemets, who faces sharp and personal criticism, accused of implementing a Stalinist policy of closing churches. The criticism focuses on the unconstitutionality of the minister's actions and his exceeding of institutional authority, given his disregard for the presumption of innocence. The possibility of compromise is not on the table; rather, a severe legal and moral challenge has been issued.
2025-02-17
Inquiry Regarding Plans for the Construction of a Wind Farm on Saaremaa (No. 680)

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session

The primary opponents are Climate Minister Yoko Alender and the government, who are criticized for violating the law, failing to answer questions, and ignoring the concerns of citizens. Minister Alender's response (being opposed to cheap renewable energy) is considered a way of dodging the question and an act of brazenness. Criticism is also directed at the mainstream media, which refers to those opposing the wind turbines as "participants in a traveling circus."
2025-02-12
A written request for a vote of no confidence in Prime Minister Kristen Michal, submitted by 29 members of the Riigikogu.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The primary opponent is Prime Minister Kristen Michal and the Government of the Republic, who are criticized both for the arbitrary interpretation of the Riigikogu Rules of Procedure and for spreading misinformation regarding wind farms. The attacks are intense and personal, accusing the Prime Minister of dictatorial behavior, worsening people's health, and refusing to negotiate.
2025-02-11
A debate on foreign policy initiated as a matter of significant national importance by the Foreign Affairs Committee.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The primary confrontation is aimed at Foreign Minister Tsahkna, who is personally criticized for inappropriate language use and labeling a member of the Riigikogu (Parliament). The attacks are intense and focus on the minister's conduct, deeming it "extremely inappropriate" for a diplomat. The criticism is primarily procedural and personal, calling the minister's suitability into question.
2025-01-29
The Chancellor of Justice's proposal to align the Electricity Market Act with the Constitution.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The main adversaries are coalition MPs, who stand accused of deliberately disregarding legal norms and implementing promises that violate the constitution. The criticism is intense, focusing on procedural shortcomings and deficiencies in the quality of legislation, arguing that the committees are failing to ensure constitutional compliance.
2025-01-29
The Ombudsman's proposal to align the law on industrial emissions with the constitution.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The main opposition is directed at bureaucracy and the concept of an "officialdom state," which grants unlimited power to civil servants. Criticism is also aimed at the original drafters of the industrial emissions law, who sought to give officials free rein to decide on integrated permits without substantive criteria. The opposition is both procedural and political, emphasizing the sense of impunity felt among officials.
2025-01-28
Draft law amending the Aliens Act and, in consequence thereof, amending other laws (to enhance migration procedures) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The primary criticism is aimed at the inaction of the government and executive bodies (the police, the Language Inspectorate) regarding the systematic enforcement of the Language Act. The criticism is intense and focuses on procedural shortcomings associated with migration activities. The speaker demands a strict and comprehensive filtering mechanism from the state to ensure the preservation of the language.
2025-01-27
Inquiry regarding elementary school textbooks (no. 672)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The primary opponents are the scientists who constitute the "scientific consensus," and they are criticized on an extremely personal level. The criticism targets the opponents' mental health, questioning which psychiatric institution they were released from. This attack is intense and rules out any political compromise.
2025-01-22
First reading of the draft statement of the Riigikogu "In Support of the People of Georgia" (564 AE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session.

The main opponents are the submitters of the draft law, who are being criticized for the lack of specific legal evidence. The opponent is further accused of discrediting the work of international observers and casting a shadow over their efforts, essentially pointing to defects. The challenge is both procedural and substantive, demanding the presentation of supporting evidence.
2025-01-22
Draft law on accession to the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child concerning complaints procedures (534 SE) - second reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session.

The criticism is levelled at Andre Hanimägi (for proposing economically unsound solutions) and Eesti 200 (for their use of jargon). The critique aimed at Hanimägi is personal and sharp, accusing him of delivering empty, contentless performances. Furthermore, those who focus on climate issues are indirectly criticized, effectively dismissing them as less important than economic problems.
2025-01-22
Continuation of the first reading of the draft law declaring the Motor Vehicle Tax Act invalid (538 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session.

The opposition is directed against the implementation of the motor vehicle tax law, sharply criticizing the lack of equal treatment in taxation resulting from the differing categorization of vehicles. The criticism is both political and procedural, and the speaker suggests the possibility that, should the bill be rejected, there would be a mass filing of claims against the state in the administrative court.
2025-01-22
The negative impacts of wind turbines

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing

The main opponents are the Minister (representing government policy) and the Health Board, who are accused of spreading misinformation and being ignorant regarding the effects of infrasound. The criticism is intense, focusing on procedural deficiencies (legal loopholes) and moral accusations (neglect towards people and nature). The speaker demands that the Deputy Director General of the Health Board be called to order.
2025-01-15
Draft resolution "Proposal to the Government of the Republic of Estonia to allocate funds for co-financing Tallinna Hospital" (498 OE) – First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The opposing side is attacked through moral doubts, implying that the proponent is against the better health of the Estonian people. The criticism is personalized and based on presumed negative motives, not on the substantive shortcomings of the draft bill. The opposition is intense and uncompromising.
2025-01-15
Electricity supply

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing

The main opponents are Lauri Hussar, who is accused of procedural violations and making a spectacle, and Michal, whom Hussar is allegedly defending. The criticism is intense, procedural, and personal, calling into question the impartiality of the presiding officer.
2025-01-14
Draft law amending the Act of the Chancellor of Justice and the Prosecutor's Office Act (524 SE) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The main criticism is directed at the ministers of the Government of the Republic, the Chancellor of Justice, and the Prosecutor's Office, whose expense reimbursements are allegedly classified. The criticism is intense and procedural, accusing them of unequal scrutiny and comparing the situation to a caste system. Journalists who are investigating the expenses of Riigikogu members are also being criticized.
2025-01-13
Request for information regarding the restoration and resilience plan and the use of oil shale (no. 668)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

Criticism is aimed at the authorities (especially the Health Board and the planners) for procedural negligence. The opposition is directed at the policy that allows detailed planning and public discussions to be carried out, despite the lack of knowledge regarding the danger wind turbines pose to human health. The attacks are policy-based and procedural.
2024-12-19
Santa Claus

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

The primary criticism is aimed at the Reform Party, which is associated with deviance and the unfair distribution of resources. The criticism is intense and focuses on previous unfair behavior toward other factions. EKRE is being presented as a victim of unfair treatment, having received only a bottle of water.
2024-12-18
Draft law (541 SE) for the first reading amending the Act of Implementing the Construction Code and Planning Act, the Environmental Charges Act, and the Planning Act (Accelerating the Adoption of Renewable Energy)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The criticism is directed at the Ministry of Climate and the Health Board, faulting them for a lack of knowledge and delaying risk assessment while detailed zoning plans are being approved. The opposition is accused of lacking common sense and disregarding facts, and they are being required to present specific data.
2024-12-17
Draft law amending the Act on the Implementation of the Common Agricultural Policy of the European Union and the Feed Act (546 SE) - First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

The primary objection targets the procedural order of the Riigikogu and the mandates of the European Union Affairs Committee (ELAK), which are deemed to be in conflict with the constitution. Also criticized are the views of coalition members of parliament who assert that the Riigikogu has delegated these powers. The criticism is severe and focuses on procedural irregularity.
2024-12-11
Third Reading of the Draft Health Care Act (433 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

The main opponents are officials of the Ministry of Social Affairs (Aive Telling) and the chairman of the Social Affairs Committee, Madis Timpson, who are criticized for ignoring public health and failing to answer questions. The opposition is particularly sharp against colleague Karmen Joller, who is personally attacked due to her knowledge (hertz vs. decibels) and previous stances (COVID vaccines). She accuses the opposing side of lacking knowledge and continuing to lie to the public.
2024-12-11
Third reading of the draft law on the 2025 state budget (513 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

The standoff is fierce between the government and the budget rapporteur, Annely Akkermann, who is being criticized for denying the current state of the economy. The criticism is intense, accusing opponents of economic incompetence and moral blindness. Furthermore, Peeter Tali (Eesti 200) is also facing criticism for his overly optimistic claims regarding the public’s standard of living.
2024-12-05
Draft law (534 SE) on Estonia’s accession to the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child concerning procedures for complaints

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session.

The opposition is directed at the supporters of the draft bill and the government's stance, focusing on deficiencies in both policy and procedure. The criticism centers primarily on the risk that the process for handling children's complaints could lead to parental manipulation, and that the text of the convention itself is too complex for a child. Opponents are not criticized personally; rather, the inadequacy of the data they have presented is being challenged.
2024-12-05
Second reading of the draft Health Care Services Act (433 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting

The main opponent is the Reform Party government, which is accused of the deliberate physical destruction of the populace. Criticism is also directed at representatives of the Ministry of Climate and the Health Board, who allegedly blocked questions posed by a member of the Riigikogu and failed to act in the interest of public health. The resistance is intense and uncompromising, demanding a halt to the construction of wind turbines and the termination of the use of mRNA vaccines.
2024-12-05
Second reading of the Basic Education Act bill (419 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting

The opposition is directed at the procedure for handling the draft bill and the inability of the presiding officer to resolve the constitutional issue. The criticism is procedural, questioning how it is possible to proceed and vote on an amendment that violates the constitution.
2024-12-04
Second reading of the draft law on the security tax (512 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting

The opposition is aimed at those implementing the government's tax policy (especially the security tax). The criticism is intense and policy-driven, accusing the opposing side of pushing an abnormal and unjust tax spree. The speaker argues that this policy undermines citizens' willingness to defend the country.
2024-12-04
Second reading of the draft law amending the Alcohol, Tobacco, Fuel and Electricity Excise Tax Act and other laws (510 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting

The main opponents are the governing coalition (the Reform Party, Estonia 200, and the Social Democrats) and Prime Minister Kaja Kallas. The criticism is extremely intense and personal, labeling the government a "criminal mafia" that is taking the very last thing people have. There is no willingness to compromise; instead, they are demanding the government's resignation.
2024-12-04
The second reading of the draft resolution (479 OE) of the Riigikogu concerning "The use of the Defence Forces in fulfilling Estonia’s international obligations in a North Atlantic Treaty Organization or member state, European Union, or United Nations-led international military operation, upon its initial contribution"

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting

The main opponents are the current government ("the ruling clique") and Foreign Minister Margus Tsahkna, whose statements are being used to substantiate the government's pro-war policy. The criticism is intense, accusing the government of destroying Estonia (via taxes, health issues, and wind farms) and enabling the killing of Estonian boys. Compromise is ruled out, with colleagues being urged not to grant the government a mandate.
2024-12-04
Values-based policy

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, press briefing

The main opposition is directed at the government and the Ministry of Climate, criticizing their handling of wind turbine planning under conditions of inadequate safety standards. Criticism is also aimed at the Health Board and the minister, who are unable to provide specific answers regarding the absence of infrasound regulations. Furthermore, the chair of the session is being criticized for disregarding procedural rules.
2024-12-03
Continuation of the second reading of the draft law amending the Child Protection Act and other laws (427 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The main opponents are coalition MPs, ministry representatives, and the segment of the commission consisting of doctors, all of whom are accused of deliberate lying and favoring pedophiles. The criticism is extremely intense and personal, accusing the opponents of moral failings and the betrayal of children ("voted for the gays"). Compromise has been ruled out, with demands that the opponents cast individual votes according to their conscience.
2024-11-20
Draft law amending the Constitution of the Republic of Estonia (527 SE) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The primary opposition is aimed at the chairman of the Constitutional Committee, who is being criticized both for procedural decisions (the use of *ultima ratio*) and for a lack of personal competence regarding fundamental constitutional matters. The intensity of the attacks is high and personal, calling into question the opponent's fitness for the position.
2024-11-20
Draft law amending the Constitution of the Republic of Estonia (536 SE) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The opposition is aimed at the proponents of the draft bill, who are sharply criticized for procedural violations and rushing the development of the law. The criticism is both political and procedural, accusing the opposing party of disregarding existing law (the rules of good legislative practice) and acting solely based on the current political climate.
2024-11-19
Third reading of the bill (457 SE) amending the Act on the Government of the Republic and amending other acts in consequence thereof (restructuring the State Real Estate Enterprise into the State Real Estate and Land Administration).

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session.

The challenge is aimed at the provisions within the Riigikogu Rules of Procedure that limit the right of independent members to speak during the third reading. The criticism is procedural and moderate, offering a solution to improve the situation without attacking individuals or political parties.
2024-11-14
Draft Law Amending the Penal Code (490 SE) – First Reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session

The primary adversaries are the Police and Border Guard Board (PPA) and key government figures (the Minister of the Interior, the Prime Minister). They stand accused of the gross misuse of Section 151^1 of the Penal Code (KarS) and of ordering the operations of a political police force. The criticism is intense, alleging that the opponents are trampling on national sentiment and desecrating the memory of those who fought for Estonian freedom. Furthermore, the speaker calls into question the legal competence of the Chairman of the Legal Affairs Committee.
2024-11-13
Second reading of the draft law on the 2025 state budget (513 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.

The main confrontation is with the governing coalition and the Reform Party, who are accused of pursuing financial policies that are destroying Estonia and of breaking the law. The criticism is intense, focusing both on illegal budgetary procedures and on taxes that reduce the income of the population. Members of the government are being called "bunglers," and compromise is ruled out, as the speaker declares that parliamentary options have been exhausted.
2024-11-13
Energetics

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, information briefing

The primary criticism is aimed at the government, which is held directly responsible for deficiencies in infrastructure security and for compensating the resulting damages. The criticism is policy- and performance-based, while simultaneously absolving the energy companies (Eesti Energia and suppliers) of responsibility.
2024-11-12
Second reading of the bill (457 SE) amending the Act on the Government of the Republic and amending other acts in connection therewith (restructuring the State Real Estate Enterprise into the State Real Estate and Cadastre Enterprise)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

The main opposition is aimed at the government, the Ministry of Climate, and the rapporteur, who are accused of concealing the content of the draft bill and misleading the public. Criticism is also directed at the European Union/Brussels, which is viewed as a threat to Estonia's mineral resources. The opposition is intense and procedural, culminating in a proposal to suspend the reading.
2024-11-11
Draft law amending the Act on Termination of Pregnancy and Sterilisation (459 SE) - First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

The main opponents are coalition MPs and medical scientists, who are accused of failing to understand the content of the draft bill and of incompetence. The criticism is intense, targeting both political decisions (the prices of cancer drugs) and procedural failings (the failure to read the bill).
2024-11-07
First reading of the draft resolution of the Riigikogu “Establishment of a Riigikogu investigative committee to investigate circumstances related to the Rail Baltic project” (460 OE)

15th Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session

The criticism is directed at the positions held by colleagues (including Valdo Randpere and the rapporteur) who emphasize the strategic paramount importance of Rail Baltic. The opposition is policy- and strategy-based, challenging their understanding of the railway's vulnerability in the event of a military conflict.
2024-11-07
First reading of the draft resolution of the Riigikogu, "Submitting a proposal to the Republic's Government to lower the value-added tax on foodstuffs to 5 percent" (492 OE)

15th Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session

The main opponents are Eesti 200 and the Reform Party. Eesti 200 faces a direct political threat concerning their low approval ratings, with the implication that failing to support the decision could prove fatal. The Reform Party is being attacked for procedural incompetence and disorganization, with specific criticism leveled at Deputy Chairman Toomas Kivimägi.
2024-11-06
Overview of the Use and Preservation of State Property in 2023–2024. Five Years of Activity-Based State Budget: Results of the Reform and Necessary Further Decisions

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The primary criticism is aimed at those responsible for the state's financial management (the government/executive branch), who stand accused of a lack of transparency and engaging in shady dealings. The criticism is both intense and procedural, focusing specifically on the lack of oversight and the improper handling of public funds.
2024-11-06
Continuation of the first reading of the draft law repealing the Motor Vehicle Tax Act (488 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The main opponents are the Reform Party and Estonia 200, who are facing intense criticism for breaking election promises and introducing the car tax. The criticism is both personal and ethical, accusing the parties of lying and forcing their members to vote against their conscience. Instead of compromise, the opposing side is being demanded to show remorse and vote in favor of the bill.
2024-11-05
Overview of the Government of the Republic’s Activities in the Implementation of European Union Policy

Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session

The criticism is aimed at the Government of the Republic and the European Union Affairs Committee (ELAK), who stand accused of violating the constitutional order and unlawfully delegating Parliament's decision-making authority. There is also opposition to the climate facts presented by the minister, with demands for precise data concerning historical temperatures.
2024-10-24
Second reading of the draft law (469 SE) ratifying the International Labour Organization’s (ILO) Convention No. 190 concerning the elimination of violence and harassment in the world of work

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session

The primary opponents are the convention's supporters and individuals who advocate for the concept of social gender, specifically naming former Minister of Justice Pakosta. The criticism is intense, ideological, and personal, branding the opposing side's ideas as "absurdity" and "social deviance." The opposition to these social concepts is absolute.
2024-10-23
A written request for a vote of no confidence in Finance Minister Jürgen Ligi, submitted by 29 members of the Riigikogu.

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session

The main opponent is Finance Minister Jürgen Ligi and, indirectly, the Reform Party, whose tax system is being criticized. The criticism is extremely sharp and personal, focusing on the minister’s alleged mental health, lying, and arrogant behavior. Compromise is ruled out, as the goal is either a vote of no confidence against the minister or his public humiliation.
2024-10-23
Minister of the Interior's political statement on internal security

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session

The primary adversary is the Minister of the Interior, whose statement is sharply criticized for violating the norms of the rule of law and the constitution. The criticism is procedural and legal, focusing on the executive branch exceeding its limits when leveling charges against individuals who have not been convicted.
2024-10-22
Draft law amending the Customs Act (515 SE) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

The main opposition is directed against the government's policy, which stiffens penalties despite no apparent wrongdoing, and highlights the contradictions of the rapporteur (Jürgen Ligi). The critique is focused on both policy and procedure, calling into question the legal-political justification as well as issues concerning national sovereignty. The intensity of this opposition is heightened by the comparison to the Soviet Union.
2024-10-22
Draft resolution "Proposal to the Republic of Estonia's Government regarding the introduction of a temporary solidarity tax on the banking sector" (487 OE) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

The primary opponent is Finance Minister Jürgen Ligi, who is facing intense personal criticism and accusations of a conflict of interest. The attacks are aimed at the minister's unsuitability for the position, not just the substance of the policy. The criticism is extremely sharp and personal.
2024-10-17
Draft law amending the Code of Civil Procedure Implementation Act and the Enforcement Proceedings Implementation Act (439 SE) – First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting

The opposition is directed at the current legal norm that restricts the deadlines for the reopening of proceedings, arguing that it infringes upon constitutional rights and the inviolability of property. The criticism is intense and principled, asserting that the law constitutes an encroachment on the constitution and is potentially unconstitutional.
2024-10-16
Draft law on the 2025 state budget (513 SE) - first reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The primary opponent is the government and Finance Minister Jürgen Ligi, whose rhetoric is widely regarded as inadequate and lacking substance. The criticism is intense and focuses on the government’s inability to resolve funding issues, which are leading to strikes. The speaker demands direct concessions from the government to the people.
2024-10-16
Draft Security Tax Act (512 SE) – First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The confrontation is aimed at the government, specifically the Minister of Finance and the actions of the Prime Minister. The criticism focuses on the government's failure to ensure public welfare, evidenced by widespread demonstrations and planned strikes (the Theatre Union, education workers, and Estonian Railways). The criticism is both policy-based and performance-based.
2024-10-16
Draft law amending the Prison Law (506 SE) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The main opponent is the minister who introduced the bill and the government, against whom both political and personal criticism is being used. The attacks are intense, accusing the minister of incompetence, obfuscation, and serving hidden agendas. The criticism ranges from the political level (additional costs, logistics) to the procedural level (taking action without the knowledge of the Riigikogu).
2024-10-16
Internal security, protection of the eastern border.

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, press briefing

The main target is the government and Minister of the Interior Lauri Läänemets, who is facing intense criticism regarding both economic policy and preparations for internal security. The criticism specifically targets political decisions (budget cuts) and the readiness to deploy special forces and water cannons against protesters.
2024-10-15
Draft law amending the Alcohol, Tobacco, Fuel and Electricity Excise Tax Act and other laws (510 SE) – first reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session

The main opponent is Jürgen Ligi and the Reform Party, who are intensely criticized for both political dishonesty and raising the tax burden. The criticism is personal, directly questioning the opponent's intelligence, and procedural, referencing the violation of the oath of office and previous promises. The possibility of compromise is not mentioned; the focus is entirely on discrediting the opponent.
2024-10-15
Draft law amending the 2024 State Budget Act (517 SE) – first reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session

The opposition is directed against the proponents of the budget bill, critically asking why the transfer of large sums was prioritized instead of covering the deficits in the social and cultural sectors. The criticism is policy-based, calling into question the government's consideration of its budgetary priorities.
2024-10-14
Draft law amending the Act on the Government of the Republic and amending other laws thereof (505 SE) – First Reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting

The confrontation is intense and highly personalized, with the government and the Minister of Justice being accused of political collusion in the appointment of Keit Kasemets and of carrying out an act of revenge against Taimar Peterkop. The criticism targets both political ethics and procedural propriety, raising questions about how the Riigikogu Board could possibly allow such a draft bill to proceed. There is zero readiness for compromise, given that the bill has been labeled as having the "smell of corruption."
2024-10-14
Draft law amending the Family Benefits Act and other laws (507 SE) – first reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting

The primary opposition is directed against the actions of the minister and the government who introduced draft bill 507 SE. The criticism is intense and legal in nature, accusing the government of violating the constitution and disregarding the ruling of the European Court of Human Rights. The opposition is principled, viewing the government's actions as clearly unconstitutional.
2024-10-08
Draft law amending the Criminal Code (452 SE) – First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

The primary conflict is with the governing coalition and the Reform Party, who stand accused of a conscious tendency toward lying and deceiving the public. The criticism is intense, personal, and morally damning, highlighting specific ministers (Kallas, Võrklaev, Ligi) and their contradictory statements. The speaker claims that the coalition wishes to retain power by implementing dishonest policies, acting as "an errand boy for orders handed down from elsewhere."
2024-10-08
Draft Law Amending the Hunting Act (444 SE) – First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

The speaker preempts objections concerning the small fee (10 euros) by acknowledging that it is indeed a small amount. Specific opponents or opposing groups are neither named nor criticized.
2024-10-07
Inquiry regarding road construction and four-lane roads (no 408)

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session

The main opposition is directed at the minister's stance regarding the widespread use of rubber posts, as presented within the context of the parliamentary query. The criticism is policy-based, focusing on the negative impact these posts have on traffic flow and overall safety. The opposition is strong, but the speaker concedes that the posts might be sensible in certain specific locations.
2024-10-07
Inquiry Regarding Via Baltica (No. 234)

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session

The main confrontation is directed against the official Rail Baltic narrative presented by the minister and the government. The criticism is intense and accusatory, suggesting that the government is either concealing or is unaware of the project's true, exploitative purpose.
2024-09-18
Second reading of the Draft Act (359 SE) on amendments to the Law on the Organization of the Energy Economy, the Electricity Market Act, and the Environmental Impact Assessment and Environmental Management System Act

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session

The primary opposition is directed at the government, which is accused of turning Estonia into a periphery and freely surrendering its natural resources to foreign "business sharks." The criticism is intense, including direct accusations of corruption and the betrayal of national interests. Furthermore, the presiding officer of the session is criticized for the lack of sufficient procedural clarity and order during the extraordinary session.
2024-09-17
Report by the Chancellor of Justice on the compliance of legal instruments with the Constitution and the performance of other duties imposed on the Chancellor of Justice by law.

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

Strong opposition is directed at the chairman of the parliamentary session, whose resignation is demanded due to his unsuitability for a democratic state. The criticism is personal and is based on a lack of democratic legitimacy. Indirect opposition is also directed at the current legal order, which allows exceptions to the territorial validity of Estonian criminal law through an international treaty.
2024-09-16
First reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Act on Restrictions on the Acquisition of Immovable Property (321 SE)

The 15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting.

The resistance is directed against the influx of foreign capital, which is acquiring Estonian land at extremely low prices, and against developers who are erecting massive wind turbines. The criticism specifically targets the operations of a French private equity investment fund, which is resulting in the seizure of private property. This opposition is both political and economic, centered on protecting national wealth.
2024-09-16
2024 Report by the Minister of the Interior on the Implementation of the State's Long-Term Development Strategy "Estonia 2035"

The 15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting.

The primary opponent is the minister, whose response is being criticized as both illogical and factually incorrect. The criticism is intense and centers on procedural inaccuracies, accusing the minister of knowingly disseminating false information in the Riigikogu chamber.
2024-09-11
Minister of Defence's 2024 Report on the Implementation of the State's Long-Term Development Strategy "Estonia 2035"

Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session

The speaker is in an oppositional stance toward the Minister of Defense, criticizing the grounds for his categorical statements and the resulting fear. The criticism targets the reliability and transparency of the information, demanding that specific sources be disclosed.
2024-09-11
The confiscation of the Lihula monument by the PPA

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, press briefing.

The primary confrontation is directed at the Minister of the Interior and the government's actions regarding the Lihula monument issue, calling into question the legal basis of their decisions. Furthermore, the actions of the presiding officer are monitored and corrected concerning adherence to procedural rules.
2024-09-11
Government Action

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, press briefing.

The main opposition is directed at the actions of the minister/government, which plans to commission a new expert assessment and has confiscated the monument. The criticism is legally and procedurally justified, calling into question the legal basis for the confiscation, since a previous expert opinion ruled out the elements defined in § 151¹ of the Penal Code (KarS).
2024-09-09
Interpellation regarding the state's plan to end compensation to farmers for damages caused by geese (No. 582)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

The opposition is directed against the policy of the government/minister concerning the termination of subsidies for farmers, which is being justified by the alleged lack of financial resources. The criticism is policy-based, emphasizing that this decision will lead to the cessation of business operations for entrepreneurs and threatens food security. The speaker rejects the effectiveness of the deterrent measures cited by the minister.
2024-07-29
Third Reading of the Draft Motor Vehicle Tax Act (364 UA)

The 15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu.

The main confrontation is directed against the chairman of the session (Mr. Hussar), who is accused of violating both the procedural rules for conducting the session and the constitution. The criticism is intense and procedural, seeking criminal sanctions to control the chairman's actions. Compromise is being avoided; instead, they are seeking legal intervention.
2024-07-29
Second Reading of the Motor Vehicle Tax Bill (364 UA)

15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu

The criticism is directed at the coalition, government officials, and specific politicians (Lauri Hussar, Siim Kallas, Signe Riisalo). The accusations are both political (the nullification of the parliament’s plenary rights via the EU Affairs Committee [ELAK]) and personal/ethical (corruption, bribery, the destruction of the Riigikogu). The opposition is intense and uncompromising, accusing their adversaries of attempting to revoke the free mandate of Riigikogu members.
2024-07-22
Granting Authorization to Prime Ministerial Candidate Kristen Michal to Form the Government

15th Riigikogu, Riigikogu's extraordinary session.

The primary criticism is aimed at the actions of Kaja Kallas's government, which spurred the creation of the bill due to "vital circumstances." The current prime ministerial candidate is being directly criticized for evading the question, with critics demanding a concrete stance.
2024-07-15
Reconsideration of the Motor Vehicle Tax Act (364 UA) left unpromulgated by the President of the Republic

15th Riigikogu, Extraordinary session of the Riigikogu

The opposition is aimed at the government and the Reform Party, who stand accused of employing "Stalinist tactics" and lacking the skills required to manage the state's finances. The criticism is both political and personal, slamming Finance Committee rapporteur Annely Akkermann for her "helpless claim" and accusing coalition members of representing "evil." Compromise is ruled out, with demands that the draft bill be thrown into the trash.
2024-06-19
Third Reading of the Bill Amending the Land Tax Act (437 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, extra plenary sitting

The primary adversary is the current government, which is being criticized both for procedural failures (specifically, the lack of agreement with local municipalities) and for the substance of its policies. The criticism is extremely intense, accusing the government of implementing Stalinist policies of destruction and taxing people to death. No willingness to compromise has been expressed; instead, the focus is placed squarely on the illegality of the government's actions.
2024-06-12
Second Reading of the Riigikogu Resolution "Supporting the Introduction of Nuclear Energy in Estonia" (431 OE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.

The opposition is aimed at the bill's rapporteur, Igor Taro, and supporters of nuclear energy, who are criticized for either ignorance or disregard for the dangers. The criticism is intense, suggesting that the bill serves the interests of foreign corporations rather than the Estonian people. No willingness to compromise is evident, as the danger has been compared to a deadly sniper.
2024-06-12
Third Reading of the Bill on Amendments to the Traffic Act and the Police and Border Guard Act (429 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.

The primary criticism is aimed at the Riigikogu Presidium and personally at Mr. Kivimägi, who stands accused of repeated procedural errors. The criticism is intense because the mistake is being labeled as symptomatic, despite being purely procedural.
2024-06-12
Overview of the Judicial Administration by Villu Kõve, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.

The criticism targets the actions of the Supreme Court and the Electoral Commission, arguing that these institutions either dismiss or fail to review complaints regarding the unreliability of e-voting. The opposition is procedural, highlighting the institutions' inability to address public concerns and overcome cognitive dissonance.
2024-06-11
First Reading of the Riigikogu Draft Statement "On the Crisis of Democracy in Georgia" (449 AE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.

The opposition is directed at the authors of the statement, who are being heavily criticized for interfering in the internal affairs of other countries. The criticism is intense and fundamental, also including personal, offensive rhetoric and accusations of escalating the situation.
2024-06-05
Second reading of the Motor Vehicle Tax Bill (364 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The opposition holds a strong, ideological position aimed squarely at the governing coalition (the Reform Party, the Social Democrats, and Estonia 200), whom they accuse of carrying out the dictates of globalists. The criticism is personal, specifically accusing Kaja Kallas of selling her soul; compromise is ruled out, and voters are advised not to cast their ballots for coalition candidates.
2024-06-05
Estonian-Georgian relations

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing

The standoff is directed at Prime Minister Kaja Kallas, criticizing her absence and demanding an explanation for her substitution by the Foreign Minister. The criticism is procedural and centers on the accountability of the government leadership to the parliament.
2024-06-03
First Reading of the Draft Resolution (409 OE) of the Riigikogu "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic to Implement Effective Measures to Protect Minors from Exposure to Pornography"

Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary sitting.

There is no oppositional stance; the criticism is aimed specifically at the security and effectiveness of the proposed identification method (the ID card), not the bill's overall objective.
2024-06-03
First Reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu (395 OE) "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic not to Recognize the Results of the Presidential Elections of the Russian Federation"

Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary sitting.

The main opponent is the Estonian Reform Party, which faces intense procedural criticism. Their actions are being compared to the Putin regime due to a perceived lack of legitimacy. The criticism focuses on alleged injustice and the failure to review an election complaint in the Saue municipality, a case involving Hanno Pevkur.
2024-06-03
Inquiry regarding the Directive on Platform Work (No. 629)

Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary sitting.

The primary criticism is directed at the Reform Party and other factions who failed to follow the political convention of supporting the minister after the vote of no confidence was defeated. The criticism is procedural and concerns political integrity and the sincerity of the support.
2024-06-03
The written motion for a vote of no confidence in the Minister of Economic Affairs and Information Technology, Tiit Riisalo, submitted by 22 members of the Riigikogu.

Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary sitting.

The main opponent is Tiit Riisalo, the Minister of Economic Affairs and Information Technology, who is being directly criticized for the failed launch of the IT system. The criticism is intense and performance-based, including a quote that calls into question the competence of the system's implementer. The opposition is specifically aimed at the minister's administrative capacity.
2024-05-30
First Reading of the Draft Act amending the Penal Code (411 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The main criticism is aimed at the media and journalists for defamation based on uncontrolled and incorrect factual claims, which damages individuals' careers and health. The stance of the Ministry of Justice and the Government of the Republic—that civil law remedies are sufficient—is also criticized, as these remedies are considered ineffective and too costly in real life. Kersti Kaljulaid's demonstrative behavior regarding the Marti Kuusik case is mentioned separately.
2024-05-30
First reading of the Bill on the Amendment of the European Parliament Election Act (lowering the voting and candidacy age) (414 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The primary opposition is aimed at the bill's proponents, challenging their arguments regarding maturity and life experience, and demanding justification consistent with the constitutional commentary. Additionally, the presiding officer of the session is criticized for procedural errors related to counter-speeches and the mentioning of names. The opposition is intense and demanding.
2024-05-29
First reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic for the Implementation of the Digital Services Tax in Estonia" (408 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The main criticism is directed at the Finance Committee as a whole, which is accused of incompetence and adopting decisions detrimental to the Estonian state. The criticism is intense and focuses on procedural incompetence, indicating the need to replace the committee members.
2024-05-14
First Reading of the Riigikogu Draft Resolution "Appointment of Oliver Kask as a Justice of the Supreme Court" (424 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The objection is aimed at the Supreme Court candidate's previous administrative practice while serving as the head of the electoral commission. The criticism is procedural, focusing on deficiencies in the protocol and a potential violation of the Administrative Procedure Code. The intensity of the challenge is moderate, but it demands a concrete response and clarification.
2024-05-09
Debate on the matter of significant national importance: "E-elections – a threat to democracy."

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The main adversaries are the Reform Party, who are accused of defending e-voting and disseminating Kremlin talking points, as well as Arne Koitmäe, the head of the Electoral Service. Criticism directed at the Reform Party is political and personal, while the Electoral Service is criticized for procedural deficiencies and providing vague answers regarding the identification of technical election violations. The attacks are intense, and there is no willingness to compromise.
2024-05-09
First Reading of the Bill to Amend the Police and Border Guard Act (370 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session.

The criticism is aimed at the former decision-makers who removed the words "nation" and "Republic" from the oath, and at the police who acted unjustly against the public during the COVID period. He accuses the police of assaulting the public during demonstrations and of carrying out illegal searches that degrade human dignity. The speaker stresses that this is not an obstructionist bill, thereby distancing himself from procedural opposition.
2024-05-08
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Local Government Council Election Act (387 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session.

The main criticism is directed at the European Union's unified citizenship and the principles of free movement, which enable the influx of EU citizens and the changing of the local political balance. Previous political decisions are indirectly criticized, with specific reference to Tiit Vähi's 1995 signature. The opposition is intense and focuses on preventing political consequences.
2024-05-08
Second Reading of the Draft Act on the Protection of Whistleblowers Reporting Work-Related Infringements of European Union Law (257 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session.

The primary opposition is aimed at the committee that managed the processing of the draft bill and its chairman, Eduard Odinets, who is accused of unlawful activities. The criticism is procedural, accusing the opposing side of violating existing law and exceeding their mandate. The intensity is very high, ranging from accusations of illegality to personal insults directed at members of the Riigikogu (Estonian Parliament).
2024-05-07
Second Reading of the Draft Act Amending the 2024 State Budget Act (389 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The main criticism is directed at the presiding officer, criticizing their rapid pace and management style which disregards the rules of procedure. The opposition is intense and focuses purely on procedural matters, demanding that the tempo be slowed down.
2024-05-07
Third Reading of the Draft Act on the Amendment of the Riigikogu Election Act and the Amendment of Other Related Acts (Bill 344 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The objection is aimed at the actions of the presiding officer of the Riigikogu session, who is restricting the right to debate, and is accused of potentially making "arbitrary decisions." Specifically, colleague Jaak Aab is criticized for violating Rule 83 of the Rules of Procedure, which pertains to the loud expression of opinions in the chamber before the voting results have been announced.
2024-05-02
First Reading of the Riigikogu Draft Statement (420 AE) "On Declaring the Moscow Patriarchate an Institution Supporting the Military Aggression of the Russian Federation"

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The primary opposition is aimed at the initiators of the draft bill and the chairman of the session, Lauri Hussar, who is being criticized personally and accused of employing undemocratic "steamroller tactics." The criticism focuses on procedural violations and the demand that the bill's proceedings be halted today.
2024-05-02
Continuation of the first reading of the Bill on the Tax on Sweetened Beverages (418 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The main opponent is Social Democrat Minister Riina Sikkut and the government, who are being criticized for legal violations and the irresponsible squandering of taxpayer money on foreign aid. The criticism is intense and includes personal accusations of shamelessness and strangling the Estonian people.
2024-04-30
First Reading of the Sugary Drinks Tax Bill (418 SE)

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session.

The objection is aimed at the presiding officer's decision to begin debate on a significant bill when only nine minutes remained on the clock. The criticism is strictly procedural, targeting the inconvenience of the process rather than the political opposition or the substance of the policy.
2024-04-30
First reading of the Bill amending the Income Tax Act (416 SE)

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session.

The main confrontation is with the government and its representatives, who stand accused of irresponsible spending and neglecting the Estonian people. The criticism is intense, involving both political attacks (the "tax axe") and personal/moral attacks, effectively demanding that the opposing side show some conscience. The possibility of compromise is not mentioned, and the attack is direct.
2024-04-30
First Reading of the Bill on Amendments to the State Fees Act and Related Amendments to Other Acts (417 SE)

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session.

The opposition is directed at the procedural decision made by the presiding officer or the Riigikogu leadership concerning the simultaneous voting on three motions. The criticism is intense and strictly focuses on the violation of procedural rules, rather than the content of the draft legislation.
2024-04-30
First Reading of the Draft Act on the Amendment of the Penal Code and the Amendment of Other Related Acts (Increasing the Fine Unit) (Bill 415 SE)

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session.

The primary opposition is aimed at the Government of the Republic and the minister, sharply criticizing the manner in which the bill was processed and the violation of legislative drafting rules. The opposition is intense, focusing on both procedural and substantive deficiencies, and demanding the suspension of the bill. Criticism is also leveled at the minister's incompetence in assuming responsibility.
2024-04-29
Interpellation concerning the state funding of elective abortions (No. 606)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The primary target is Prime Minister Kaja Kallas, who is being personally criticized for her alleged role in destroying the nation's economy. The attack is intense and highly personal, labeling the opponent a "genius" in an ironic sense. As a compromise, they are proposing her resignation in exchange for financial compensation.
2024-04-29
Inquiry regarding pressure exerted by the European Central Bank on the Basel Committee (No. 628)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The main criticism is directed at global climate policy and the institutions implementing it (the European Union, the European Central Bank). The spokesperson sharply criticizes Madis Müller, the President of the Bank of Estonia, for his lack of fundamental climate knowledge and his inability to grasp the soundness of the decisions being made. Criticism is also aimed at the stance taken by former President Kersti Kaljulaid, who argued that action must be taken simply because of EU membership, rather than on the basis of scientific conviction.
2024-04-17
Second Reading of the Draft Act (344 SE) on the Amendment of the Riigikogu Election Act and Related Amendment of Other Acts

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The main opponents are the Riigikogu Presidium and the presiding officer of the session, who are directly accused of violating the law and adopting unlawful decisions, especially regarding the handling of recesses and amendments. The opposition is intense and procedural, demanding that the Presidium convene a meeting to resolve the conflicts. The rapporteur (Terras) is also criticized for providing insufficient answers regarding the security of e-voting.
2024-04-17
WHO Pandemic Agreement

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, information briefing

The main opponents are the Ministry of Social Affairs and the minister, who is being intensely criticized for procedural violations, including breaking promises and the lack of an Estonian translation of the documents. Criticism is also directed at the president, who referred the matter to the social committee, thereby avoiding direct responsibility.
2024-04-17
The Sustainability of Estonia's Security Policy and the Transatlantic Relationship

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, information briefing

The main opponents are Foreign Minister Margus Tsahkna—whose conduct is sharply criticized and who is accused of pushing the Kremlin narrative—and the government as a whole. There is also opposition to the mainstream media, which dismisses local reports of crimes committed by allied soldiers as conspiracy theories. The criticism is intense and includes personal accusations.
2024-04-16
The Minister of Culture's 2024 Report on the Implementation of the State's Long-Term Development Strategy "Estonia 2035" (including the implementation of the "Estonian Sports Policy Fundamentals until 2030")

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The confrontation is directed against the position of the minister (or the government), who allegedly underestimates the problem of library closures in rural areas. The criticism is justified by an incorrect assessment of the political situation and its resulting consequences for rural life.
2024-04-10
First reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic to Initiate Amendments to the Traffic Act with the Aim of Permitting Longer and Higher Gross Mass Vehicles in Traffic, Thereby Increasing the Efficiency of Road Transport" (Bill 278 OE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session

There is too little data.
2024-04-08
Interpellation concerning interference in the internal affairs of Hungary (No. 570)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The opposition is aimed at a specific diplomatic action deemed a violation of the law, and it indirectly criticizes the government (the minister) for the lack of oversight. The criticism is severe and legally substantiated, focusing on procedural failure and the violation of law.
2024-04-04
Elections of the Riigikogu Board

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The confrontation is directed against the election procedure applied by the chair of the session, particularly concerning the majority rule for voting. The criticism is purely procedural, questioning why the current practice differs from standard Riigikogu procedure. The attacks are not personal, but focus instead on the discrepancy in the rules.
2024-04-03
First Reading of the Draft Resolution (274 OE) of the Riigikogu "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic to Prepare and Restore a Militarized Border Guard as a Separate Agency"

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The objection is directed at the bodies overseeing the procedure (the committee or the session chair) who incorrectly determined the voting requirement for the draft legislation. The criticism is severe, focusing on procedural errors and the disregard of legal norms. The speaker also criticizes the lack of response to questions raised previously.
2024-04-03
First Reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic for Enhancing the Exercise of Administrative Oversight over the Prosecutor's Office" (280 OE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session

Strong opposition is aimed at the Prosecutor's Office, which is being criticized for its inaction regarding legal violations, and at members of the government, who are accused of lying to parliament and presenting false facts. The criticism is intense, procedural, and demands that parliament be given the means to intervene in cases of dishonest government conduct.
2024-04-02
First reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic to Abandon the Imposition of the Car Tax and Withdraw the Motor Vehicle Tax Bill from the Riigikogu Proceedings" (374 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting

The opposition is directed at the actions of the Riigikogu committee and the session chairman (Lauri Hussar), who are demanding an absolute majority vote of the full membership for the adoption of the bill. The criticism is intense and strictly procedural, accusing them of unlawful conduct and violating the law.
2024-04-01
Interpellation Regarding Mass Immigration (No. 617)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The main targets of criticism are government ministers (both current and former, Kalle Laanet) and Prime Minister Kaja Kallas. Ministers are being intensely attacked for their lack of knowledge and incompetence regarding crucial security matters. Kallas is criticized for her political stance of refusing to deport Ukrainian men of mobilization age.
2024-04-01
Interpellation to the Government of the Republic concerning plans to increase immigration (No. 614)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The primary criticism is aimed at the Government of the Republic and the minister, both of whom are accused of incompetence and mismanaging priorities. The criticism is intense and politically charged, highlighting that the minister failed to answer a direct question regarding the sensibility of the decision. Central to the controversy is the political decision to allocate funds to foreign labor at the expense of domestic needs.
2024-04-01
Interpellation concerning the consequences of reducing family benefits (No. 561)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The main opponent is Prime Minister Kaja Kallas and the government, who are accused of hypocritical behavior (promising to raise benefits only to cut them later) and avoiding accountability. The criticism is intense, combining political objections (tax hikes) with personal attacks (lying).
2024-04-01
Interpellation Concerning the Undermining of the State's Foundations (No. 523)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The primary adversary is Kaja Kallas, who is being directly challenged. The criticism is aimed at the precision in defining political terminology and values, demanding answers regarding the fundamental principles of politics.
2024-03-19
First Reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic to Lower the VAT Rate on Cancer Medicines" (277 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The criticism is directed at those members of the Riigikogu who were absent from a crucial vote, interpreting their inaction as a substantive vote against the motion. The opposition is rather procedural and moral, not directly policy- or personality-based.
2024-03-19
The 2024 Report by the Minister of Health on the implementation of the state's long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035"

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The criticism targets the government's or minister's failure to act or inadequate regulation, which permits the food industry to incorporate large amounts of synthetic E-numbers into food products. This is a policy-driven critique, calling for the minister to provide an immediate action plan to address the issue.
2024-03-18
Inquiry concerning the justification of the activities of the Prosecutor's Office and the Security Police Board (KaPo) (No. 528)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The main adversaries are the security and law enforcement agencies (the Prosecutor’s Office and KaPo), who are accused of political targeting, witness tampering, and fabricating the charges. The criticism is intense and systemic, alleging that the Prosecutor’s Office is unchecked and operates with impunity ("They don't touch their own"). Furthermore, the press is viewed as a tool of the Prosecutor’s Office, helping to shape the necessary public opinion.
2024-03-13
First reading of the Draft Decision of the Riigikogu (322 OE) "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic to Prepare a Comprehensive National Defence Development Vision Extending up to the Year 2045 and a New Extraordinary National Defence Development Plan Deriving from It, Extending up to the Year 2034"

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting.

There is insufficient data.
2024-03-13
First Reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic to Lower the Value Added Tax on Foodstuffs and Medicines to 5 Percent" (272 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting.

The opposition is targeting the coalition, criticizing their poor attendance at the session ("only two people from the coalition are present") and questioning their ability to ensure the functioning of the Riigikogu (Parliament). The criticism is directed both at procedural matters and their overall capacity to work.
2024-03-12
First Reading of the Draft Act Amending the Government of the Republic Act (276 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd plenary sitting

The main opponent is the chair of the session, from whom specific justifications and alternative measures supporting the draft bill are demanded. The criticism is intense and includes a political attack, comparing the opponent's vagueness to that of Kaja Kallas. The criticism is aimed both at the substance of the policy (the absence of alternatives) and the procedural logic.
2024-03-11
Interpellation concerning Estonia's critical demographic situation (No. 597)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session

The main opponent is Prime Minister Kaja Kallas, who is intensely criticized both on a personal level (arrogance, lack of knowledge) and procedurally (failure to respond). The criticism also extends to the Speaker of the Riigikogu, Lauri Hussar, who, according to the speaker, allows the Prime Minister to shirk accountability. The possibility of compromise is not mentioned; the focus is entirely on accusation.
2024-03-06
First reading of the Bill (359 SE) for the Act supplementing the Act on the Organization of the Energy Sector and the Act on Environmental Impact Assessment and Environmental Management System

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The main opponent is the bill's presenter (Kristen Michal), who is sharply criticized for avoiding answers and for dishonesty. The criticism is personal and intense, including a comparison to Kaja Kallas and an irrelevant reference to vaccination.
2024-03-06
The Prime Minister's Messages

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, press briefing

The primary confrontation is with the session chair, who is being heavily criticized for violating procedural rules and for subjectivity in managing the session. The criticism is intense and is directed against the chair's decisions and conduct, not against their political stances.
2024-03-05
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Organization of the Energy Sector Act and Other Acts (Bill 356 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The confrontation is directed against the sponsors of draft bill 356 SE and the policy of transitioning purely to renewable energy, a policy widely regarded as ignoring reality. The criticism is policy-based, centering on the opposing side's inability to offer viable solutions for energy production during winter in Northern climates.
2024-03-04
Interpellation concerning the rise in the cost of living in Estonia (No. 599)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The primary opponent is Prime Minister Kaja Kallas, who is being criticized both for her political actions and for her perceived lack of personal erudition and empathy. The criticism is extremely intense, accusing Kallas of deliberately destroying the Estonian people's ability to cope economically. The chairman of the session, Lauri Hussar, is criticized for violating procedural rules, with demands for an immediate response.
2024-03-04
Interpellation Regarding the Temporary Taxation of Banks' Excess Profits (No. 595)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The confrontation is aimed directly at the head of the government, who is being accused of personal incompetence (plagiarism from a comical fantasy film) and destroying the country. The criticism is intense and personal, and the speaker refuses to pose questions to the opponent, which demonstrates a lack of willingness to compromise and a complete disregard for the opponent.
2024-02-21
First Reading of the Draft Act on the Amendment of the Estonian Public Broadcasting Act (165 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

Criticism is aimed at the governing coalition and the prime minister (Kaja Kallas), who are accused of blocking opposition bills and obstructing work. Strong criticism is also directed at the National Broadcasting (ERR), accusing it of political imbalance, biased coverage (denigrating Trump), and labeling opposition members as "Kremlin trolls." The criticism is both procedural and substantive.
2024-02-21
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Value Added Tax Act (286 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The standoff is intense and aimed squarely at the ruling coalition and Kaja Kallas personally. The criticism is procedural, accusing the coalition of employing a political strategy to systematically block all opposition bills, which suggests a complete lack of willingness to compromise on the issue at hand.
2024-02-21
A campaign spreading fear of war on the streets of Tallinn

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing

The primary confrontation is directed at the minister, who is accused of "flat-out lying" when answering a question. The criticism is intense, personal, and calls into question the government member's honesty and accountability.
2024-02-14
First Reading of the Motor Vehicle Tax Bill (364 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The main opponent is Mart Võrklaev, who is being criticized extremely heavily for both political incompetence and personal dishonesty (specifically, an accusation of lying). The criticism targets both the political substance (CO2 targets) and his procedural conduct (evading responses). There is no willingness to compromise; the goal is the complete discrediting of the opponent.
2024-02-14
Privatization of enterprises

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing

The primary opponent is Finance Minister Mart Võrklaev (Reform Party) and the coalition that is implementing the plan for the privatization of state-owned enterprises. The criticism is intense and focuses both on the political substance (the detrimental effects of privatization) and the procedure (the minister avoids answering the question and instead talks about unrelated matters).
2024-02-07
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Public Prosecutor's Office Act and the Courts Act (167 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting.

The main criticism is directed at the institution of the Prosecutor’s Office, which is accused of systemic abuse, impunity, and operating a "closed circle of protection." He/She also sharply criticizes the Ministry of Justice’s inability to exercise substantive oversight. Furthermore, he/she condemns the use of the Prosecutor’s Office for political purposes (citing the Porto Franco and Marti Kuusik cases), which has led to the collapse of the government and the ruin of people’s health.
2024-02-05
Interpellation regarding the abolition of the special VAT rate for accommodation establishments (No. 289)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting

The main opponent is the government—or the presenter personally—who is sharply criticized for the misuse of taxpayer money. The criticism is intense and targets both political decisions and pre-election dishonesty, specifically citing the breaking of promises. The opposition is principled and uncompromising.
2024-01-25
First Reading of the Draft Act Amending the Atmospheric Air Protection Act (160 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The criticism is primarily directed at the Chairman of the Environment Committee (Igor Taro) and other committee members (Mait Klaassen, Hanah Lahe). They are accused of procedural violations and ignoring public concerns, evidenced by the expulsion of an interest group representative. Furthermore, the Ministry of the Environment and the Environmental Board are criticized for their evasive attitude: they acknowledge the problem but maintain that state intervention is required. The attacks are intense and personal, directly calling the opponents' conscience into question.
2024-01-25
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Emergency Situation Act (124 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The opposition’s stance is directed against Kaja Kallas’s government and the coalition parties (the Reform Party, Eesti 200, and the Social Democrats). The criticism is both procedural (citing the blocking of opposition bills) and substantive, accusing the government of indifference toward the nation’s future. The resistance is intense and suggests that the government’s actions pose an existential threat.
2024-01-24
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Alcohol, Tobacco, Fuel, and Electricity Excise Duty Act (170 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

Insufficient data.
2024-01-24
Review of the Implementation of the "Fundamentals of Legislation Policy until 2030" in 2022

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The main targets are the government, which is being criticized for violating procedural norms (specifically, impact assessments), and the Speaker of the Riigikogu, who is being criticized for restricting peaceful demonstrations. The criticism is intense and focuses on hypocritical conduct and procedural breaches.
2024-01-24
First reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu (360 OE) on the Amendment of the Riigikogu Resolution "Formation of the Estonian Delegation to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe."

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The criticism is directed at the actions of the presiding officer, strictly focusing on procedural errors made during the handling of a single agenda item. This is a warning of moderate intensity, demanding that the errors cease to avoid a third transgression.
2024-01-24
The Situation in the Republic of Estonia

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing

The main opponent is Prime Minister Kaja Kallas, who is being sharply criticized for her personal integrity and actions. The criticism is intense and includes direct accusations of lying and evading questions. There is no sign of a willingness to compromise; instead, the opponent's dishonesty is being emphasized.
2024-01-23
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Medicines Act (Bill 162 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The opposition is intensely focused on major corporations (Pfizer, Moderna) and international institutions (WHO, EMA, CDC, FDA), which are accused of greed, data secrecy, and disregarding the public interest. The Estonian government is criticized for its complicity in carrying out illegal human research, violating laws, and funding the WHO. Television channels (Kanal 2) are also criticized for violating the Medicines Act in their vaccine advertisements.
2024-01-22
Inquiry Concerning the Imposition of the Motor Vehicle Tax (No. 310)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The main opponents are Kaja Kallas's government and Finance Minister Mart Võrklaev. The criticism is intense and ideological, accusing the government of liquidating private property and employing Stalinist measures. Compromise is ruled out, as there are calls to overthrow the government.
2024-01-22
Interpellation concerning the environmental impact of mandatory building renovation and citizens' ability to pay (No. 123)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The main opponents are Kaja Kallas's government and the Minister of Climate, who are accused of implementing anti-people policies. The criticism is intense and ideological, focusing on the violation of constitutional rights and the use of socialist methods. The government is accused of being overly zealous in fulfilling directives and is threatening to take action against the protesters.
2024-01-17
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Income Tax Act (Bill 172 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The main criticism is aimed at the ruling coalition (the Reform Party, Estonia 200, and the Social Democrats), who are accused of harming the economy. Specifically, Finance Minister Mart Võrklaev is criticized for his economic assertions, and Annely Akkermann for her performance leading the Finance Committee. The criticism is both political (tax hikes) and procedural (lack of analysis and avoidance of substantive debate).
2024-01-17
First reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Income Tax Act (Bill 233 SE).

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The main opponents are the presiding officers of the Riigikogu session, who are directly accused of violating the internal rules and procedures. The criticism is intense and procedural, calling into question the opposing side's motives and their narrative regarding the length of time required to process the draft legislation. The speaker sharply disputes the narrative disseminated by the opposing side that the proceedings will last until spring.
2024-01-17
Draft Bill Amending the Income Tax Act (118 SE), First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The primary adversary is the government and the coalition, whose fiscal policy is under sharp criticism. The criticism is policy-based, specifically accusing the government of engaging in activities that damage entrepreneurship and result in bankruptcies. The opposition is intense, going so far as to label the policy as anti-people.
2024-01-17
First Reading of the Draft Act Amending the Customs Act (350 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The opposition is directed at both the rapporteur of the draft bill and the substance of the legislation itself, criticizing it as an infringement of the constitution and an improper procedural step. The criticism is strictly based on policy and procedure, accusing the draft bill of legalizing secret scrutiny. As a compromise, the use of technical means (such as scanning or X-ray inspection) is being proposed.
2024-01-16
First Reading of the Draft Act Amending the Public Prosecutor's Office Act (105 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The primary criticism is aimed at the Prosecutor's Office, citing their inaction and avoidance of responsibility concerning the creation of fabricated evidence. The criticism is procedural, focusing on why sanctions stipulated in the Criminal Code were not applied for filing an unlawful charge. The intensity of the criticism is moderate, but substantively sharp, demanding specific mechanisms of accountability.
2024-01-15
Inquiry concerning the misappropriation of "Slava Ukraini" funds and the related investigation (No. 578)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.

The confrontation is aimed at the responsible official (likely a minister), whose knowledge and transparency regarding the progress of the investigation are being scrutinized. The criticism is procedural and is based on the premise that the government should have internally discussed the issue concerning the honor of the state.
2024-01-15
Interpellation regarding the capability to ensure internal security in the new situation where uncontrolled immigration has made the people of Estonia worried about their property and their lives (No. 536)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.

The primary conflict is centered on the Interior Minister and the government, who face criticism for misaligning internal security priorities. The criticism is intense, focusing specifically on the political failure to guarantee adequate pay for police officers—an issue directly linked to internal security itself.
2024-01-15
Interpellation concerning the use of electronic cigarettes (No. 377)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.

The criticism is aimed at the current prohibition policy, which is deemed ineffective and dangerous because it encourages underground production. The opposition is policy-driven, focusing on the failure of the chosen legislative method (prohibition) to protect public health.
2024-01-15
Inquiry Regarding the Saaremaa Fixed Link (No. 278)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.

The main opponent is Prime Minister Kaja Kallas, who is being ironically criticized for her leadership skills, empathy, and socio-political results. The criticism is both personal and results-oriented, demanding answers to the questions raised in the interpellation, without expressing any willingness to compromise.
2024-01-15
Interpellation regarding the necessity and construction of Rail Baltic (No. 262)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.

Intense opposition is aimed at Prime Minister Kaja Kallas, who is accused of lying at the podium and concealing information regarding the ownership of Rail Baltic. The criticism also extends to former ministers (Aas, Pentus-Rosimannus) and "big European Union magnates," who are viewed as systematically exploiting Estonia's natural resources. A compromise regarding the necessity of Rail Baltic is ruled out.
2024-01-15
Interpellation concerning the demographic crisis and its resolution (No. 232)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.

The speaker is taking an oppositional stance against Kaja Kallas's government, demanding accountability from them regarding the resolution of the demographic crisis. The criticism targets the effectiveness of the government's actions and calls for specific legal evidence.
2024-01-15
Inquiry on Immigration (No. 133)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.

The confrontation with the government (Kaja Kallas, Mart Võrklaev) is intense and uncompromising. Criticism is aimed both at political inaction (the inability to initiate legislative changes) and ethical violations (lying and manipulating figures). Sanctions and judicial accountability are being demanded for the members of the government, which rules out any cooperation.
2024-01-15
Interpellation concerning the enhancement of the wartime indirect fire capability of the Defense Forces (No. 72)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.

Fierce opposition targets Prime Minister Kaja Kallas and the leaders of the Estonian Defence Forces. The criticism is based on both policy and competence, accusing the leadership of outdated methods of warfare and failing to ensure adequate defense capabilities. The critic also takes aim at the previous Riigikogu majority, who did not support withdrawing from the convention banning landmines.
2024-01-11
First reading of the Bill for the Amendment of the Vital Statistics Registration Act (106 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The primary criticism is aimed at the coalition and the ministry, which are using justifications to reject opposition bills—justifications that restrict the right of initiative of MPs. She sharply criticizes the "your-and-our-bills methodology" and Liisa Pakosta's explanation concerning the work underway at the ministry. The criticism is primarily procedural, calling into question the parliament's rules of procedure and constitutionality.
2024-01-10
First Reading of the Bill on Amendments to the Value Added Tax Act (245 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The objection is directed against the actions of the presiding officer, who is accused of violating the rules of procedure by processing the draft legislation too quickly. The criticism is intense and purely procedural, challenging the legitimacy of the process.
2024-01-10
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Value Added Tax Act (149 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The resistance targets European Union directives and the mandatory compliance they entail, which restricts national sovereignty in tax policy. The criticism is both political and procedural, questioning the scope of EU obligations and whether they correspond to the promises made upon accession.
2024-01-10
Economy

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing

The main opponent is Kaja Kallas and her government, who are criticized for their rigid fiscal policy and disregard for reality. The criticism is intense, encompassing both political points (dismissing the strike as futile) and slight personal insinuations (the rank of a globalist general). The opponent's stated positions (the budget has been approved, no additional funds will be allocated) are used as the foundation for the rhetorical attack.
2024-01-08
Interpellation concerning the impact of the Green Transition on the administrative area of the ministry under your leadership (No. 341)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.

The primary criticism is leveled against the domestic mainstream media, which is accused of failing to report on and actively silencing the protests in Germany. The criticism is intense, comparing the media to a Soviet partisan and suggesting deliberate malice. Implicitly, the opposition is also aimed at the drivers of the Green transition policy.