By Agendas: Arvo Aller

Total Agendas: 231

Fully Profiled: 231

2025-10-15
Discussion of the state issue of significant national importance initiated by the Committee on European Union Affairs: "Estonia's Choices and Opportunities in the European Union's 2028–2034 Long-Term Budget"

The 15th Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting

The primary adversary is the central leadership of the European Union (the Commission), which is accused of imposing ideological mandates (such as LGBTX issues and the "green craze") and taxes that strip member states of their sovereignty. Criticism is also aimed at the "incompetents" in power who fail to take farmers into account. No possibility for compromise is seen, as the entire process has, in the speaker's estimation, failed.
2025-10-08
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Planning Act and Other Related Acts (683 SE)

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The main opponents are the Social Democrats ("SocDems"), who are accused of suppressing public opinion and favoring the construction of wind turbines. The criticism is intense and focuses on procedural injustice, which allows lobbyists or developers to select unsuitable locations for public display.
2025-10-08
Continuation of the first reading of the Draft Law on the State Budget for 2026 (737 SE)

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The criticism is directed at the government (the minister) and the individuals responsible for drafting the budget, focusing on the lack of transparency and potential manipulation of the budget methodology. The technical aspect is also criticized because the materials for the agenda item have gone missing, which hinders the work of the parliament.
2025-10-07
First Reading of the 2026 State Budget Bill (737 SE)

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The opposition targets the government's budget methodology, specifically the exclusion of depreciation, which suggests a distortion of the overall fiscal picture. The criticism is policy-based, focusing on procedural inaccuracies rather than individuals.
2025-09-24
The Regional Affairs and Agricultural Minister's 2025 presentation on the implementation of the state's long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035"

Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.

The main opponent is the ruling party and the minister, whose policies are described as deliberate actions that exacerbate regional inequality and the decline of rural areas. The criticism is intense and focuses on political decisions (tax hikes, subsidy cuts) and the expansion of bureaucracy via PRIA. No willingness to compromise is expressed; instead, they demand a change in policy.
2025-09-22
Inquiry regarding a naval operation (no. 784) that failed and ended with the risk of military confrontation.

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session

The criticism is aimed at the official responding to the inquiry and the government, who stand accused of failing to inform members of the Riigikogu and overstating the true value of cooperation with allies. The attacks are procedural in nature and focus on the efficacy of the policy, pointedly questioning what has changed and what the outcomes of the operations have been.
2025-09-17
Re-examination of the Act Amending the Act on Churches and Religious Communities (570 UA) Not Proclaimed by the President of the Republic

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting.

Limited data
2025-09-15
Inquiry Regarding Latvian Red Beetles in Estonia (no. 796)

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting

The criticism is directed at government institutions (the Environmental Board, PTA, and the Ministry of the Environment) for their failure to resolve the bureaucratic mess concerning the status of red deer. The opposition is both procedural and results-based, emphasizing the agencies' confusion and subsequent inaction, which ultimately harmed local producers.
2025-09-15
Inquiry Regarding Increasing the Decision-Making Authority of Municipalities Concerning the Establishment of Land Tax Rates (No. 777)

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting

Strong opposition is directed at the current and previous governments (including the Social Democrats), who are criticized for removing land tax restrictions and failing to support farmers. The criticism is intense and policy-driven, accusing the government of using the land tax as a "good lever" to finance its obligations. The first speaker also criticizes the respondent's previous voting procedure.
2025-09-10
First reading of the draft law on civil crisis and state defense

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session

The main opponent is the Government of the Republic, which is being criticized because the new law allows it to demonstrate its power and restrict the activities of the people. The criticism is both policy-based and procedural, focusing on the weakening of the Riigikogu’s role. The opposition is intense, and compromise is ruled out by the proposal to immediately reject the draft bill.
2025-09-10
A written request for a vote of no confidence in Social Minister Karmen Joller, submitted by 21 members of the Riigikogu.

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session

The primary target is Social Affairs Minister Karmen Joller, who faces fierce criticism regarding both her professional competence and her diplomatic conduct. The backlash targets both her policy management (specifically, the speed at which decisions are reversed) and her personal behavior (including spreading misinformation and chastising a member of the U.S. Cabinet). The intensity of the criticism is high, demanding a public apology from the minister.
2025-09-09
The Minister of Defence's 2025 presentation on the implementation of the state's long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035"

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session.

The primary confrontation is aimed at the government and the Minister of Defence, who are being criticized for making rushed decisions and evading responsibility. Additionally, the government's treatment of local Nursipalu residents is criticized; they are deemed unfairly labeled for defending their home area.
2025-09-08
Inquiry Regarding Changes to 2025 Beekeeping Support for Small Beekeepers (no. 761)

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session

The opposition is aimed at the actions taken by the government and the minister, who implemented cuts that compelled the beekeeping sector to alter the terms of their subsidies. The criticism leveled is both political and procedural, stressing that the sector was presented with a fait accompli, and that these changes harm small-scale aid recipients and complicate the execution of necessary plant protection work.
2025-09-04
Chair implementation

15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu

The primary targets are the government and its ministers, who face criticism both for their political decisions (tax increases, budget cuts) and for evading responsibility. The criticism is particularly pointed concerning political culture and the improper application of parliamentary procedural rules, which mandate 51 votes for the adoption of all decisions. Furthermore, ministers are accused of shifting responsibility onto the courts.
2025-06-18
Economy

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing

The confrontation is directed at the government and the Reform Party, criticizing their economic policy, which is leading to a decline in competitiveness. The criticism is based on both policy and results, accusing the government of taking money away from the people and then presenting the increase in the tax-free minimum as a victory. He considers the government's attitude—that stagnation equals progress—to be unacceptable.
2025-06-16
Draft law amending the Waste Act and, in consequence, amending other laws (657 SE) – first reading

XV Riigikogu, V Session, Plenary Sitting

The main opponent is the minister and the government, whose claims are considered false, and whose policy is criticized for pushing obligations onto local governments. The criticism is strongly policy-based, focusing on the increase in bureaucracy and costs. The resistance is intense, as the speaker is joining the petition for the rejection of the bill.
2025-06-12
A written request for a vote of no confidence in Justice and Digital Minister Liisa-Ly Pakostale, submitted by 42 members of the Riigikogu.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The main opponent is the government and the Minister of Justice, who are accused of concealing and protecting corruption, particularly regarding the Johanna-Maria Lehtme and Pihlakodu cases. The criticism is intense and substantive, highlighting the government’s failure to ensure justice and accountability to the Estonian people.
2025-05-21
Draft law amending the Income Tax Act (597 SE) - First Reading

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.

The confrontation is intense and is directed against the Government of the Republic and the majority in the Riigikogu, who are accused of squeezing the last money out of the people. The Minister of Finance is particularly criticized, who is accused of shifting the blame for the tax hikes onto Putin, as well as former coalition partners (the Social Democrats) for their inaction.
2025-05-19
Inquiry regarding labor productivity, Estonia's competitiveness, and cheap labor (no. 742)

15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.

The primary criticism is aimed at the government and the minister, who are accused of failing to accept ideas during negotiations and restricting their responses to a specific target group. The government is sharply criticized for failing to address the root causes and for favoring the importation of cheap labor, which the speaker views as the replacement of the Estonian populace. No willingness to compromise with the government is being shown; rather, a change in government policy is being demanded.
2025-05-19
Inquiry Regarding the Security of the Southeastern Border Region of Estonia (No. 729)

15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.

The main criticism is directed at the government and the prime minister, who stand accused of inaction and failing to adequately protect the border. This criticism is policy- and performance-based, citing, for instance, the passive response during the Narva River buoys incident, where "we did absolutely nothing."
2025-05-15
Draft law amending the Nature Conservation Act, the Hunting Act, and the State Property Act (612 SE) – First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session

The opposition is directed at the state institutions (the Environmental Board, the ministry) that prepared the draft bill, criticizing their proposed unfair compensation mechanisms and vague sanctioning rules. The criticism is policy- and procedure-based, questioning the fairness of the state’s actions toward private owners.
2025-05-14
Draft law amending the Securities Market Act and, in consequence thereof, amending other laws (588 SE) – second reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session

The main opponent is the Social Democratic Party (SDE), which is criticized both for its policies (the definition of underrepresented gender) and for its previous work in government. The criticism is intense and includes the direct refutation of accusations (the denigration of women), as well as the personal quoting of government members (Tanel Kiik). The opposition is both substantive and procedural (the linking of the bill's objectives).
2025-05-14
First reading of the draft resolution of the Riigikogu "Proposal to the Republic's Government to submit an application to the European Commission for the exemption of energy production companies from the obligation to purchase CO2 quotas" (619 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session

The main criticism is aimed at the government, which is accused of neglecting the welfare of the people, and at officials of the Ministry of Climate. Officials are criticized for failing to identify or utilize EU legal instruments, such as Article 122, for requesting a CO2 derogation. The criticism is policy- and procedure-based.
2025-05-14
Legal entity liability

15th Riigikogu, fifth sitting, information briefing.

The main targets of criticism are the Ministers of Justice and Digital Affairs, who are accused of inaction, along with the Prosecutor's Office, whose decisions are considered unlawful and regrettable. The governing coalition is also indirectly criticized, with hints suggesting political protection in the Pihlakodu case. The opposition is intense and demands concrete steps toward holding those responsible accountable.
2025-05-13
Draft law amending the Courts Act and, in consequence thereof, amending other laws (to improve the administration of courts) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session

The main criticism is directed at the minister and the government, who are pushing the bill through, accusing them of shirking responsibility and shifting the decision-making level elsewhere. The criticism is politically charged and focuses on procedural rushing and political accountability (or the lack thereof). Compromise is ruled out because the speaker views the essence of the bill as detrimental to the regions.
2025-05-12
Hearing regarding the care reform (no 719)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.

The main criticism is aimed at the Ministers of Social Affairs and Justice, who are accused of avoiding responsibility and passing the buck. The criticism is procedural and political, focusing on the government's inaction in addressing the problems of the care reform and shortcomings in oversight.
2025-05-08
Draft Law on Declaring the Security Tax Act Invalid (595 SE) - First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The confrontation is aimed at the governing coalition, which is being criticized for its slow progress and lack of prior cooperation on tax issues. The criticism targets the coalition's capacity for action and political will, noting that the previous draft bill failed to demonstrate cooperation.
2025-05-07
Draft law amending the Alcohol, Tobacco, Fuel and Electricity Excise Tax Act and the Value Added Tax Act (594 SE) – First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

Strong opposition is directed at the current coalition and the Reform Party's previous coalitions, who are criticized for their inability to make the country wealthy through taxation. The criticism is leveled on both political and performance grounds, focusing on the government's poor decisions.
2025-05-06
The Minister of Finance's 2025 presentation on the implementation of the state's long-term strategy "Estonia 2035" (including an overview of the development directions of the public service in 2024)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The opposition is aimed at the Minister of Finance, who is being criticized for the lack of clarity in the strategy and the failure to address climate issues in the economic presentations. The criticism is both political and financial, demanding clarification regarding the accounting for 2.6 billion euros.
2025-05-05
Inquiry Regarding Rural Areas (no. 713)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The primary opposition is aimed squarely at the governing party Eesti 200 and its ministers, criticizing their complete lack of regional policy and specific controversial decisions. The criticism is intense, focusing heavily on allegations of political incompetence, factual inaccuracies, and the reduction of the state's presence in regions (specifically citing the closure of the Jõhvi courthouse and the Kiviõli unemployment office). There is also strong resistance to the government's tax policy.
2025-04-24
Debate on the nationally significant issue "The Drawbacks of Wind Power," initiated by the faction of the Estonian Conservative People's Party.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The primary opposition is aimed at the existing European regulation that mandates the trading of CO2 quotas. Specific political opponents or groups are not personally criticized.
2025-04-23
Draft law amending the Health Services Organisation Act (advance directive of a patient’s end-of-life will) – first reading (604 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

Criticism is directed at the procedural shortcomings and ambiguity of the draft bill, particularly concerning the consultation and signing procedures. The speaker does not oppose the bill's objective, but rather its imprecise wording, questioning who will ultimately be advised and what the implications for the validity of the documents will be.
2025-04-23
Socialism in a right-wing government

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing

The main adversaries are the government—specifically the prime minister, Minister Karmen Joller, and the Reform Party—all of whom are directly linked to the nursing home issues. The criticism is intense, targeting both the social tax policy and the government's failure to ensure the safety of vulnerable individuals. There is no sign of willingness to compromise; instead, accountability and clear positions are being demanded.
2025-04-17
Draft Law Amending the Value Added Tax Act (593 SE) – First Reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session

The main criticism is leveled against the ruling coalition, which is accused of pursuing an anti-public tax policy and ignoring worthwhile initiatives proposed by the opposition. The coalition's arguments against VAT exemptions are unequivocally branded as hostile to the public, and critics claim the government is essentially calling the 24 countries that utilize such concessions stupid. The criticism is primarily based on policy and procedural grounds.
2025-04-16
First reading of the draft resolution of the Riigikogu "Submission of a plan of action for the development of Estonia's electricity production capacities and electricity networks to the Riigikogu by the Government of the Republic, to ensure energy security" (575 OE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session

The primary criticism is aimed at the Isamaa party and Mr. Reinsalu, who stand accused of backing previous energy policy decisions (such as the 2017 targets and the 2022 legislative amendment) that have ultimately led to the current bottlenecks. The criticism is rooted in both policy and procedure, emphasizing the failure to deliver on goals supported by Isamaa (for instance, achieving a subsidy-free market).
2025-04-15
The Ministry of Justice and Digital Transformation's 2025 presentation on the implementation of the state's long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035."

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.

The opposition targets the inefficiency of the ministry's leadership (unnecessary posts) and the need to clarify the minister's accountability in justice matters. The criticism is procedural and performance-based, requiring specific results from politically appointed officials in speeding up investigations.
2025-04-14
Inquiry regarding the explosively grown cormorant population (no. 725)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The opposition is aimed at the government's or ministry's current failure to act, or the prohibitions that prevent the management of the cormorant population. The criticism is policy and procedure based, specifically questioning why lethal deterrent hunting in the spring has not been allowed, even though the damage is extensive.
2025-04-09
Draft law amending the Act on Documents Establishing Identity and amending other acts in consequence (572 SE) – first reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session

The opposition is aimed squarely at the policies of the minister who introduced the draft bill and the government, specifically regarding state oversight and the control of personal data. The criticism is focused on both policy and procedure, directly raising the question of whether the state intends to start dictating the length of a person's name.
2025-04-08
Draft law amending the Securities Market Act and, in consequence thereof, amending other laws (588 SE) - first reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The main confrontation is between the Ministry of Finance and the minister, whose political priorities are considered misguided and whose responses are deemed insufficient. Criticism is directed both at the substance of the policy (which is seen as mere substitute activity) and the minister's communication style, and there is an expressed desire for the minister to be replaced.
2025-03-27
Board elections of the Riigikogu

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

Insufficient data. The speech does not mention or criticize any opponent, political grouping, or procedural objection.
2025-03-25
Draft law amending the Emergency Situations Act (589 SE) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

There is no direct opposition or criticism regarding the content of the draft bill in the speeches concerned. The questions presented are neutral and procedural, intended to resolve ambiguities in the text.
2025-03-25
First reading of the draft law amending the Whistleblower Protection Act on Breaches of European Union Law and the Act on International Sanctions (EU restrictive measures directive) (584 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The criticism is directed against the implementation of the government's policy, particularly concerning the promise to reduce bureaucracy, which the draft legislation appears to violate, resulting in additional costs. Furthermore, the law is criticized for its lack of clarity regarding employee liability for sanctions violations when they have failed to fulfill their obligations. The criticism is based on both policy and procedural grounds.
2025-03-24
Draft law amending the Electricity Market Act (568 SE) - First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session.

There is no direct confrontation or personal criticism, but the speaker challenges the general narrative regarding the low cost of renewable energy (especially wind power). The criticism is aimed at policies that permit subsidies and conceal infrastructure costs from the consumer.
2025-03-20
Draft law (583 SE) for the first reading regarding accession to the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women and approval of amendment to Article 20, paragraph 1, of the Convention.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

While direct opposition to the draft bill has not been expressed, critics are questioning the justifications provided by the bill’s sponsors, demanding evidence that Estonia’s failure to join the protocol has actually created unresolved problems. The criticism is focused on procedural matters and the soundness of the underlying policy content.
2025-03-18
Draft law amending the Political Parties Act and the Credit Institutions Act (585 SE) – first reading

Fifteenth Riigikogu, fifth sitting, plenary session

The main confrontation is directed at the government, and especially the Eesti 200 party, which is being criticized over the Slava Ukraini scandal and the lack of transparency in its financial movements. Criticism is also aimed at the bill's proponent for vague legislation (specifically concerning the "third party" issue) and for granting excessively broad powers to ERJK (the Committee for Supervising Party Financing). The opposition is intense and includes personal and party-based attacks.
2025-03-18
Draft law amending the Aliens Act and, in consequence thereof, amending other laws (to improve migration proceedings) – second reading

Fifteenth Riigikogu, fifth sitting, plenary session

The opposition is aimed at the sponsors/presenter of the draft legislation, criticizing both the substance of the policy and the necessity of the procedure. The critique is policy-based, centering on the question of why the law needs to be amended when it already offers extensive exceptions and flexibility.
2025-03-17
Inquiry Regarding Maarjamaa United School (No. 710)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The primary opposition targets the policy championed by the minister, criticizing both the ideological advocacy of the green transition and the plan to merge seven schools. The criticism is directed at the political ideology and administrative decisions that could lead to the closure of educational institutions. There is no apparent willingness to compromise; instead, the demand is for direct answers and a complete reassessment of the policy.
2025-03-17
Inquiry regarding the financing of Russian-language Delfi and ETV+

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The criticism is aimed at the government (via the prime minister) and indirectly at media outlets regarding their hiring practices. The controversy focuses on political and security questions, demanding clarification on how the loyalty of employees who hold Russian citizenship will be guaranteed.
2025-03-17
Inquiry regarding the third year of record-low birth rates in Estonia (no. 703)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The criticism is directed at the Government of the Republic, demanding concrete actions to improve the birth rate. The opposition is based on policy and performance, expressing concern over the government's inability to solve the demographic crisis.
2025-02-27
A written request from 21 members of the Riigikogu expressing a vote of no confidence in Climate Minister Yoko Alender.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The main criticism is directed at the minister facing a no-confidence motion and the government’s decision-making process, especially concerning the falsified data that served as the basis for distributing 2.6 billion euros. There is a demand for the public disclosure of the specific culprits (names), which signals intense opposition. The criticism is primarily procedural and political, focusing on the lack of accountability.
2025-02-26
Security

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, press briefing

There is strong opposition to the government and the prime minister, who is being criticized for failing to answer Mart Helme's question and for offering incorrect interpretations. The criticism is directed at the failure of the green transition policy, which, in the speaker's assessment, is neither environmentally sound nor economically feasible.
2025-02-25
Draft law amending the Constitution of the Republic of Estonia (536 SE) – second reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The main opposition is directed against the coalition's constitutional amendment bill, which would grant voting rights to stateless persons. The criticism is policy-based, warning that this change will reduce the incentive to acquire Estonian citizenship and could even affect the results of future presidential elections. Critics also point to the potential danger of the amendment concerning citizens of aggressor states.
2025-02-20
Discussion of the nationally important issue "Plan for the Future of Sport: How to Bring Medals and Get Children Moving"

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session.

Criticism is aimed at the current government (coalition) for cutting funding for hobby education and "strangling" business activities, which in turn jeopardizes private sector contributions to sports. The criticism is rooted in policy and procedure, highlighting the lack of financial resources and the crucial importance of budget negotiations.
2025-02-19
Draft law amending the Defence Forces Organisation Act and the Economic Zone Act (strengthening maritime security) - first reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary sitting

The criticism is indirectly aimed at the neighboring state's actions (the removal of border buoys), which necessitates a national response. There is no direct opposition to domestic political groups or individuals; the focus is on reacting to the challenge.
2025-02-17
Inquiry Regarding Plans for the Construction of a Wind Farm on Saaremaa (No. 680)

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session

The primary criticism is aimed at the rapporteur and the project's supporters, who are accused of lying and presenting dishonest economic justifications. The intensity of the attack is high, driven by suspicions that the profits are flowing into the pockets of specific "ideological companies and political parties." The criticism targets both the substance of the policy and ethical transparency.
2025-02-12
A written request for a vote of no confidence in Prime Minister Kristen Michal, submitted by 29 members of the Riigikogu.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The main targets of criticism are the leaders of the ruling coalition ("the leaders of the three parties"), who are accused of the wasteful distribution of 2.6 billion euros to wind energy developers, and the embattled prime minister facing a no-confidence motion. The criticism is intense, including accusations of lying, hypocrisy, and using unverified data to justify their policies.
2025-01-28
Draft law amending the Aliens Act and, in consequence thereof, amending other laws (to enhance migration procedures) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

Criticism is aimed at the political loopholes in the draft bill, which allow the system to be abused by temporary agency workers, especially concerning the language requirement and the obligation to provide accommodation. There is no direct opposition or personal attacks against the minister; rather, emphasis is placed on the political risk that agency workers will start driving people around in Estonia.
2025-01-22
Draft law amending the Value Added Tax Act (539 SE) - First Reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session.

The primary criticism is directed at the government, which stands accused of prioritizing the budget—specifically 400 million euros in revenue—over the financial well-being of the populace. These attacks are intense and policy-based, questioning the government's adherence to the principle of a uniform tax system, which the administration often touts as the "only wise" approach.
2025-01-21
Draft law amending the Act on the Implementation of the Common Agricultural Policy of the European Union and the Feed Act (546 SE) – Second Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session

The criticism is directed against the ministry (for ignoring the shortcomings of the draft legislation) and the regulatory bodies (the Labour Inspectorate, PRIA), whose actions create an unfair and punitive system for businesses. The opposition is intense and focuses on the deficiencies in the policy and procedure, particularly the unequal treatment between private individuals and businesses.
2025-01-14
Draft law amending the Act of the Chancellor of Justice and the Prosecutor's Office Act (524 SE) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The opposition is aimed squarely at the coalition partners and the government for maintaining a lack of transparency regarding the compensation packages of high-ranking officials. Separately, the legislative committee is being criticized for procedural inaction, specifically for failing to formulate an independent stance and simply adopting the government’s negative position. The criticism is intense and focuses on the failure of both policy and procedures.
2025-01-13
Inquiry regarding the court budget reduction plan (no. 669)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

Strong opposition is directed at the minister and the party Eesti 200, who are accused of having "already given up" on Ida-Virumaa and seeing no reason to fight for the regions. The criticism is policy-driven, refuting the minister's justifications regarding the underutilization of premises and the strengthening of defense capabilities, calling the latter a false pretext.
2025-01-13
Inquiry regarding the closure of the Jõhvi Courthouse (no 666)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The main confrontation is aimed at the minister and the government, who are accused of short-sightedness, ignoring regional security, and relying solely on figures. Criticism is also directed at the Chairman of the Viru County Court, who allegedly introduced the issue of the courthouse being underutilized. The government is accused of threatening legal professionals with layoffs to force them to abandon the Jõhvi courthouse.
2025-01-13
Request for information regarding the restoration and resilience plan and the use of oil shale (no. 668)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The objection is directed at the respondent's actions or inaction, seeking clarification regarding the mitigation of the social consequences of phasing out oil shale energy and the future of the Auvere power plants. The criticism is policy- and procedure-based, focusing on the connection between the goals declared by the government and the actual social impacts.
2024-12-19
Santa Claus

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

Insufficient data.
2024-12-17
Draft law amending the Act on the Implementation of the Common Agricultural Policy of the European Union and the Feed Act (546 SE) - First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

The primary opposition is aimed at the substance of the draft bill and the government's policy, specifically against the unfair implementation of social conditionality, which places producers in an unequal position. The criticism is policy-driven and intense, as the speaker, acting on behalf of the faction, proposes rejecting the bill at the first reading, thereby ruling out any compromise in its current form.
2024-12-16
Overview of the Implementation of the Fundamentals of Criminal Policy until 2030

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

The opposition is aimed at the policy of the government or the rapporteur, a policy that ignores the principle of regionality and results in the closure of courthouses. The criticism is policy-driven, accusing the opposing party of failing to adopt a regional policy approach and demanding clarification on whether the Minister of Regional Affairs and Agriculture has approved the closure.
2024-12-11
Second reading of the draft law amending the Subsoil Act (435 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

The opposition is aimed at the initiators of the draft bill, who are criticized for disregarding socio-economic impacts and for the absence of a compensation mechanism. The criticism is policy-based and procedural, accusing the opposing side of causing great damage to businesses and violating their legitimate expectation.
2024-12-11
Draft law amending the Accounting Act and, as a consequence, amending other laws (516 SE) - second reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

The opposition is directed against the arguments presented by the bill's rapporteur and the committee, particularly concerning the continuity of legislation. The criticism is both policy-based and procedural, underscoring the contradiction between the content of the bill and other items on the agenda. This opposition is intended to be supervisory rather than ruling out compromise.
2024-12-11
National Defence and Wind Turbines

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth session, press briefing.

The main opposition is aimed at Kaja Kallas’s government and the 2022 decision by four ministers that greenlit the development of the Aidu wind farm. The criticism is both political and procedural, accusing the government of weakening national defense and shortening the early warning period. The opposition is intense because the wind turbines are considered a direct threat to security.
2024-12-04
Second reading of the draft law on the security tax (512 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting

The primary opponent is the Reform Party-led government, which is criticized both for its policies (the introduction of a new tax) and for its past performance (the failure to collect taxes). The criticism is intense, accusing the government of "stifling" entrepreneurship and dismissing the justification for introducing the tax as an "arbitrary" assertion.
2024-12-04
Draft law (447 SE) for amending the Education Act of the Republic of Estonia and amending other related laws (establishing the obligation to attend school) – third reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting

The primary criticism is aimed at the government and the Ministry of Education and Research (HTM), who stand accused of ignoring procedural rules and perpetuating unequal funding. The criticism focuses on both policy and procedure, highlighting the absence of impact assessments and the way local governments have been put in an impossible position. The opposition is intense, and compromise is out of the question, as the political party does not support the bill in its entirety.
2024-12-03
Continuation of the second reading of the draft law amending the Child Protection Act and other laws (427 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

Criticism is aimed at the coalition, the Social Affairs Committee, and the ministry, accusing them of failing to look into the matter deeply and of forcing the ministry's views through a law firm. The procedural aspect is also criticized because the draft bill was brought back in the same form, despite substantive amendment proposals. The opposition is principled, as there are fears that the bill will open the doors to pedophiles.
2024-12-02
Inquiry Regarding the Future of Tartu Agro (No. 655)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

The main criticism is aimed at the administrative incompetence of the minister and the government, citing a lack of clarity and the deliberate obscuring of planning processes. Strong opposition is specifically directed at moving the Land and Space Agency under the Ministry of Economic Affairs and Communications, citing the threat of corruption and a lack of transparency. The criticism is procedural and political, not personal.
2024-11-20
Draft law amending the Constitution of the Republic of Estonia (527 SE) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

Criticism is aimed at the Social Democrats (Sotsid) regarding their rhetoric concerning the absence of comparative analysis. Coalition committee members are also criticized for failing to consider the readiness for negotiation and obstructing the equal advancement of the two best bills.
2024-11-19
Draft law amending the Code of Civil Procedure and, in consequence thereof, amending the Act on the Application of the Code of Civil Procedure and the Enforcement Procedure Act (493 SE) - first reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session.

The speaker focused on identifying the opposition, specifically inquiring who in the committee voted against concluding the first reading. The criticism is directed primarily at the incompleteness of the information provided by the chair, rather than at the opposition itself.
2024-11-19
Third reading of the bill (457 SE) amending the Act on the Government of the Republic and amending other acts in consequence thereof (restructuring the State Real Estate Enterprise into the State Real Estate and Land Administration).

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session.

The opposition is aimed at the initiators of the draft bill and the current government, criticizing the inefficiency of the administrative arrangement and the subordination of the Land Board (Maa-amet) to the Ministry of Economic Affairs and Communications. The criticism is policy-driven, focusing on the reduction of regional policy capabilities and the establishment of an improper administrative structure.
2024-11-13
Second reading of the draft law on the 2025 state budget (513 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.

The primary criticism is aimed at the government and the Reform Party, who stand accused of implementing tax increases and disregarding the principle of regional balance. This criticism is policy-driven, with particularly fierce opposition directed at the introduction of the car tax and the closure of state institutions in rural areas. Furthermore, the government's hypocrisy regarding austerity measures and its consistent dismissal of opposition proposals are being highlighted.
2024-11-12
Second reading of the bill (457 SE) amending the Act on the Government of the Republic and amending other acts in connection therewith (restructuring the State Real Estate Enterprise into the State Real Estate and Cadastre Enterprise)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

The primary standoff targets the coalition and the Minister of Economic Affairs and Industry, whose competence regarding regional policy is being called into question. The criticism is twofold: substantive (the illogical relocation of functions) and procedural (the elimination of the obligation to consult citizens). The opposition is intense, accusing the government of diminishing the levers of regional policy.
2024-11-11
Draft law amending the Holiday and Commemoration Day Act (453 SE) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

The opposition is aimed at the ruling coalition, which is being sharply criticized for procedural hypocrisy in demanding impact assessments while simultaneously pushing through tax hikes. The coalition is also accused of failing to support the draft bill because it would actually benefit Estonian working people. The criticism is intense and also includes suspicions regarding the inaction of the committee's vice-chairman.
2024-11-06
First reading of the draft resolution (479 OE) of the Riigikogu concerning "The use of the Defence Forces in fulfilling the international obligations of the Republic of Estonia in a North Atlantic Treaty Organisation or member state, European Union, or United Nations-led international military operation involving the first contribution thereto."

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The criticism is aimed at those clinging to outdated positions, regardless of the shifting international landscape and the actions taken by the UN's top official. The speaker implicitly criticizes the UN Secretary-General for shaking hands with the president of the aggressor nation. This criticism is rooted in policy and procedure, calling for an immediate reassessment of these stances.
2024-11-06
Continuation of the first reading of the draft law repealing the Motor Vehicle Tax Act (488 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The criticism is directed at the coalition (or the tax proponents), focusing on their inability to provide convincing justifications for keeping the car tax in place. The attack is both procedural (citing a lack of discussion in the committee) and substantive, demanding proof of the tax's positive impact.
2024-11-05
Overview of the Government of the Republic’s Activities in the Implementation of European Union Policy

Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session

The opposition is directed at the government's actions and the priorities of specific ministers. The Minister of Justice is being criticized for focusing on closing courthouses rather than reducing bureaucracy, which highlights a contradiction with the goals set by the government. The criticism is policy- and procedure-based, demanding clarification of the data presented by the government.
2024-11-04
Draft law amending the Sports Act (518 SE) - first reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

Direct political opponents are not being criticized; instead, the criticism is aimed at the drafters of the bill due to the law's inaccuracies and contradictions (such as the failure to standardize terminology and the removal of the requirement for a development plan). The criticism is constructive and policy-based, with the goal of improving the legislation.
2024-11-04
Draft law amending the Maritime Safety Act (526 SE) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The criticism is subtly directed towards the current government, questioning their ability to implement initiatives that drive economic progress. This contrast is drawn by positively highlighting the actions of the previous government (Centre Party, Isamaa, and EKRE), which resulted in economic growth and increased excise revenue.
2024-11-04
Inquiry regarding the departure of state institutions from rural areas (no 653)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The main criticism is directed at the government and specific ministers (the Ministry of Justice, the Climate Minister, Kristina Kallas), whose activities are hindering regional development. The criticism is policy- and results-based, accusing the government of shifting responsibilities onto local municipalities. The government’s flagship project (the Just Transition Fund) is intensely labeled as "smoke and mirrors" and ineffective.
2024-10-24
Second reading of the draft law (469 SE) ratifying the International Labour Organization’s (ILO) Convention No. 190 concerning the elimination of violence and harassment in the world of work

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session

The primary opposition focuses on the substance of the International Labour Organization convention and the perceived need for its ratification in Estonia, which is widely viewed as both incomprehensible and unnecessary. Criticism is also leveled against the rapporteur and the government for failing to provide answers (for instance, regarding the number of countries that have ratified the convention) and for the procedural confusion surrounding the introduction of amendments.
2024-10-23
Minister of the Interior's political statement on internal security

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session

The primary opponent is the Minister of the Interior and the government, who are accused of creating the tense situation and implementing ineffective measures. The criticism is policy-based, focusing on specific failures (e.g., the control of symbols in Sinimäed and the inability to distinguish loyal citizens). The opponent is further criticized for their obstinacy and denial of the situation.
2024-10-22
Draft resolution "Proposal to the Republic of Estonia's Government regarding the introduction of a temporary solidarity tax on the banking sector" (487 OE) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

The opposing side is the rapporteur whose economic argumentation (avoiding the taxation of banks during a favorable economic climate to establish stability) is directly disputed. The criticism is focused on policy and justification, casting doubt on the consistency of the logic presented.
2024-10-21
Inquiry Regarding Tax Increases (No. 647)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The primary confrontation is aimed at the minister and the government, who are criticized both for delaying their response to the interpellation and for their economic policy claims (e.g., having the best tax environment). The criticism is directed at the substance of the policy and the procedures, especially the underestimation of the actual impact of the tax increase.
2024-10-21
Request for Information Regarding Prison Space Rental (no. 645)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The opposition is directed at the political claims and terminology used by the minister/speaker, which are deemed illogical. The criticism is policy-based, focusing on the contradiction (empty prisons versus export capacity) and the lack of clarity in the government's communication.
2024-10-16
Draft law on the 2025 state budget (513 SE) - first reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The opposition is aimed at the presentation and transparency of the government's (or the minister's) budget. The criticism is procedural, demanding explanations regarding the insufficient or unclear reporting in the documents of budget data concerning the Defense League's funding and Rail Baltic.
2024-10-16
Draft Security Tax Act (512 SE) – First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The confrontation is aimed at the minister and the government, who are being criticized for the insufficient explanation and lack of clarity surrounding the draft bill. The criticism is policy-driven, focusing on the technical deficiencies of the bill and the minister's self-pity.
2024-10-16
Internal security, protection of the eastern border.

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, press briefing

The primary target is the Minister of the Interior (who is currently acting as Prime Minister). He is being directly criticized for incompetence, avoiding responsibility, and deliberately focusing on "pseudo-issues." The criticism is intense and procedural, accusing the government of treating its own people with contempt and demanding that they take responsibility for the incident, rather than just offering an apology.
2024-10-15
First reading of the draft law amending the Income Tax Act and the Defence Service Act, and the draft law amending the Income Tax Act (509 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session

The opposition is directed at the manner in which the draft bill is being processed, sharply criticizing the failure to consider the proposals of interest groups and the lack of procedural transparency. Furthermore, the true justifications for introducing the bill are also being questioned, with reference to possible external influences.
2024-10-14
Draft law amending the Act on the Government of the Republic and amending other laws thereof (505 SE) – First Reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting

The opposition is directed against the government-initiated bill 505 SE and the accompanying administrative reform, which is considered ineffective and detrimental to regional development. Criticism targets both substantive choices (specifically, the sectoral placement of the Land Board) and procedural errors (insufficient coordination and dubious savings figures). The confrontation is based on both policy and procedure.
2024-10-14
Draft law amending the Family Benefits Act and other laws (507 SE) – first reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting

The opposition is directed at the initiators of the bill, who are being criticized for taxing vulnerable groups. Strong procedural criticism is being raised regarding the extension of procedural deadlines, demanding a genuine justification.
2024-10-07
Inquiry regarding road construction and four-lane roads (no 408)

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session

The main criticism is aimed at the current government and the Minister of Infrastructure, who are being accused of having misplaced priorities and neglecting the development of infrastructure in Ida-Virumaa. The opposition is intense and politically charged, emphasizing the cancellation of previous projects and the failure to address dangerous traffic conditions. The government stands accused of "unfortunately doing absolutely nothing" for the benefit of Ida-Virumaa.
2024-10-07
Inquiry Regarding Via Baltica (No. 234)

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session

The confrontation is aimed at the minister and the government, who are being criticized for unrealistic plans and insufficient funding concerning major infrastructure projects. The criticism is intense and policy-driven, calling the government’s projections for Rail Baltica "a very distant utopia."
2024-10-07
An inquiry regarding internet services offered to people in Estonia (no. 646)

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session

Criticism is directed at the poor implementation of the project, highlighting inefficient resource allocation (specifically, extending internet access to locations without users). The opposition is both procedural and results-based, centering on the failure of high-speed internet to reach the areas where people actually live.
2024-09-25
Draft law amending the Prison Act and, in consequence thereof, amending other laws (474 SE) - first reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session

There is too little data.
2024-09-25
Draft Law Amending the Land Register Act (467 SE) - First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session

There is no direct opposition or criticism; rather, a question is being raised regarding a specific exception within the legal provision concerning the disclosure of politicians' data. The aim is clarification, not an attack.
2024-09-25
Draft law amending the Penal Code and other laws in consequence thereof (offence-based sanctions) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session

The primary opposition is aimed at Eesti 200, who is being criticized for foreign policy failures (the UN vote, the Georgia incident) and for disparaging partners (Hungary). The criticism is intense and relates both to policy and to specific scandals (the Lehtme case). The speaker is also criticized for calling Hungary a mouthpiece for the Kremlin.
2024-09-25
Draft law (469 SE) for the ratification of the International Labour Organization’s (ILO) Convention No. 190 concerning the elimination of violence and harassment in the world of work – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session

The opposition is directed against the proponents of the draft legislation (the minister) and international organizations who are imposing a convention that is deemed unnecessary and a threat to the domestic order. The criticism is sharp, particularly concerning the social provisions related to school education and gender neutrality.
2024-09-25
The Regional Affairs and Agricultural Minister's 2024 presentation on the implementation of the state’s long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035"

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session

The primary target is the Minister of Regional Affairs and Agriculture, along with the government, both of whom face sharp criticism for their incompetence and inability to act (citing examples like the Tartu Agro tender and the relocation of the Land Board). The criticism focuses on political decisions and procedural failures, specifically highlighting the exclusion of farmers from the ÕÜF. The criticism is intense and uncompromising.
2024-09-25
Draft law amending the Emergency Situations Act and, as a consequence, amending other laws (426 SE) – third reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session

The primary opponents are the governing coalition and the socialists, who are accused of populism and overburdening businesses ("slapping massive taxes on them"). The criticism is primarily policy- and procedure-based, focusing on the fact that proposals from Riigikogu members and interest groups were not considered during the drafting of the bill. The opposition is intense, given that the faction refuses to support the bill.
2024-09-24
Draft law amending the Arms Act and, in connection therewith, amending other laws (468 SE) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting

Data on attitudes of opposition is unavailable because the speech was directed toward a procedural explanation and did not contain criticism of policies or groups.
2024-09-24
Draft law amending the Simplified Taxation Act for Entrepreneurial Income and amending other acts in consequence (463 SE) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting

Insufficient data.
2024-09-24
Draft law amending the Value Added Tax Act and the Tax Procedure Act (462 SE) - First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting

The opposition is aimed more at the specific method chosen for the draft bill, questioning why a simpler and potentially more effective path—namely, raising the threshold for VAT registration—wasn't selected instead. The criticism is policy-driven and moderate, centered on the rationality of the political choices.
2024-09-24
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Funded Pensions Act and Other Acts (464 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting

There is too little data.
2024-09-23
First Reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic to Move the Embassy of the Republic of Estonia in Israel from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem" (325 OE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session

There is no direct confrontation with political opponents, but the speaker casts doubt on the procedural transparency of the actions taken by the representative of the Riigikogu committee. He criticizes the lack of justification provided for both submitting the matter to a vote and the requirement for 51 votes, demanding clarification regarding the decisions made by the committee chairman.
2024-09-19
First Reading of the Draft Act on the Amendment of the Adult Education Act and Related Amendments to Other Acts (465 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session

The opposition is directed at the bill submitted by the government/minister, criticizing its terminological vagueness and the incomplete transposition of European Union rules. The critique is policy- and procedure-focused, accusing the government of introducing unnecessary and confusing concepts.
2024-09-18
First reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Waste Act, the Traffic Act, and the State Fees Act (461 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session

Criticism is directed at the implementation details and procedures of the draft bill, not at specific opponents or political groups. The speaker is calling into question the broad applicability and security of the application being developed by the Transport Agency. The opposition is more an expression of caution due to the insufficient thought put into these solutions.
2024-09-18
Second Reading of the Bill on Amendments to the Emergency Situation Act and Related Amendments to Other Acts (426 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session

Not enough data.
2024-09-18
Second reading of the Draft Act (359 SE) on amendments to the Law on the Organization of the Energy Economy, the Electricity Market Act, and the Environmental Impact Assessment and Environmental Management System Act

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session

The speaker does not voice direct opposition or criticize political adversaries, but instead raises a procedural question concerning the lack of clarity in the legislative text. The criticism is aimed at the drafting of the bill, rather than its initiators.
2024-09-16
2024 Report by the Minister of the Interior on the Implementation of the State's Long-Term Development Strategy "Estonia 2035"

The 15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting.

The primary adversary is the government, and specifically the Minister of the Interior, who is being accused of outright incompetence and the improper handling of state symbols. The criticism is intense and encompasses both administrative failures (buoys, the Rescue Board) and issues of values (Lihula, Sinimäed, the Bronze Soldier). There is no sign of a willingness to compromise; instead, change is being demanded.
2024-09-11
First reading of the Draft Act amending Section 27 of the Law on Preschool Institutions (319 SE)

Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session

Insufficient data.
2024-09-11
First Reading of the Draft Act on the Amendment of the Subsoil Act (435 SE)

Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session

The primary opposition is aimed at the minister and the government, criticizing them for rushing the process, failing to involve stakeholders, and ignoring the concerns of businesses. The criticism is both procedural (specifically regarding the formality of the coordination table) and political, accusing the government of forcing the bill through and underestimating its socio-economic impact.
2024-09-11
First Reading of the Draft Act Amending the Waste Act (430 SE)

Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session

The criticism is aimed at the procedure for preparing the draft bill and its inaccuracies, citing insufficient involvement of specialists on the committee. The objection addresses regulatory gaps, such as the improper exclusion of the Agricultural and Food Board from the list of authorities handling misdemeanors. The criticism is policy-based and procedural.
2024-09-11
Minister of Defence's 2024 Report on the Implementation of the State's Long-Term Development Strategy "Estonia 2035"

Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session

The criticism is aimed at the actions of the minister/government, highlighting procedural deficiencies (the late submission of the report) and substantive gaps (the disregard for the role of the Defence League). The criticism is policy- and procedure-based, and its intensity is moderate but clear, hinting at improper conduct ("it would be decent").
2024-09-09
Inquiry Regarding the Work of Kristina Kallas (No. 632)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

The main criticism is directed at the Minister of Education, Kristina Kallas, calling into question her competence and decisions. The criticism is policy- and results-based, focusing on the negative consequences of centralizing education in rural areas.
2024-07-29
A written demand submitted by 23 members of the Riigikogu for a vote of no confidence in the Minister of Infrastructure, Vladimir Svet.

15th Riigikogu, Riigikogu extraordinary session.

The main confrontation is with the Minister of Infrastructure, who is being criticized on procedural grounds (failure to pass a security clearance) and on value-based grounds (an unclear stance regarding de-Sovietization and borders). The criticism is intense and manifests in direct questioning of the minister’s legitimacy. Furthermore, political instability and party switching are also being criticized.
2024-07-29
Second Reading of the Bill to Amend the Income Tax Act (443 SE)

15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu

The opposition is directed at the bill's proponent or the government, stemming from the ambiguity in the legal text surrounding the phrase "the minister responsible for the sector." The criticism is procedural and policy-based, demanding a clear definition of responsibility (Minister of Finance versus Minister for Regional Affairs).
2024-07-29
Second Reading of the Motor Vehicle Tax Bill (364 UA)

15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu

The main confrontation is with the government, which is being criticized for the law's unconstitutionality, poor economic policy, and unsuccessful tax revenue collection. The criticism is intense, and compromise is ruled out, as the law is considered irredeemably bad. They also reject the government’s argument that the car tax is necessary because Estonia is the only country in Europe without one, drawing a parallel with e-elections.
2024-07-22
Granting Authorization to Prime Ministerial Candidate Kristen Michal to Form the Government

15th Riigikogu, Riigikogu's extraordinary session.

The speaker is a strong opponent to both the plans of Prime Ministerial candidate Kristen Michal’s government and the previous Kaja Kallas administration, criticizing both for failing to address food security. The criticism targets the substance of the policy (tax hikes that hurt the poor) and the procedure (the lack of a mandate to impose new taxes). The opposition is both intense and substantive.
2024-07-15
Extraordinary Election of the Riigikogu Vice-Speakers

15th Riigikogu, Extraordinary session of the Riigikogu

Insufficient data.
2024-07-15
Reconsideration of the Motor Vehicle Tax Act (364 UA) left unpromulgated by the President of the Republic

15th Riigikogu, Extraordinary session of the Riigikogu

The main opponents are the coalition partners and the law's rapporteur, who is accused of defending legislation that is not in compliance with the constitution. The criticism is intense and focuses on the legal and procedural irregularities of the legislation. The politician asserts that the opposition to the law is absolute, ruling out any compromise regarding its substance.
2024-06-12
Second reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Land Tax Act (437 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.

The opposition is aimed at the coalition and the Finance Committee, criticizing not only the substance of the draft bill but also the disregard for legislative procedure and the marginal inclusion of interest groups. Particular criticism is leveled at the incompetence of the rapporteur and his alleged recommendation that farmers sell their land, which demonstrates the opponents' attitude toward landowners.
2024-06-12
Third reading of the Draft Act on the Amendment of the State Fee Act and Related Amendments to Other Acts (417 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.

The main opposition is directed against the government’s policy of raising state levies, accusing them of simply trying to grab easy money. The criticism is policy-based, calling into question the justifications for the expenses presented by the Ministry of the Interior and the necessity of the additional funds planned for the state budget. The opposition is intense and uncompromising, as EKRE does not support the draft bill.
2024-06-10
Interpellation regarding the non-taxation of banks' extraordinary profits (No. 615)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The main opponent is the government led by the Reform Party and the prime minister, who are being criticized for their poor handling of the economy and unfair taxation. The criticism is intense, accusing the government of imposing retroactive taxation on citizens (the car tax) while simultaneously sparing the banks.
2024-06-10
Inquiry regarding Ukraine's Accession to the European Union (No. 613)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The main criticism is aimed at the government's actions, specifically regarding procedural transparency and preparation in supporting Ukraine's accession. The criticism is policy-based, questioning the absence of substantive discussions before consent was given at the European Council.
2024-06-05
Second reading of the Motor Vehicle Tax Bill (364 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The opposition is aimed at the government coalition, particularly the Reform Party, which is being accused of breaking pre-election promises and attempting to solve the country’s problems through inadequate taxation. The criticism is both substantive (the tax is useless) and procedural (lack of inclusion and unfair handling of amendments). Compromise has been ruled out, with calls for the bill to be rejected.
2024-06-05
Prime Minister's Visits

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing

The primary criticism is directed at the Prime Minister (Kaja Kallas) due to the lack of transparency regarding her international visits, and at the substitute minister (Margus Tsahkna) for evading answers. The criticism is procedural, emphasizing the lack of information and the government's avoidance of accountability. The Prime Minister is also criticized for her alleged desire to avoid appearing before the Riigikogu.
2024-06-04
Third reading of the Bill on Amendments to the Income Tax Act (416 SE)

15th Riigikogu, third session, plenary sitting

The main opponents are the ruling coalition: the Reform Party, Eesti 200, and the Social Democrats. Criticism is intense, focusing on political injustice, broken election promises (specifically, the tax-free average pension), and the rushed handling of draft legislation. The opposition is absolute, as no vote supporting the bill will be cast.
2024-06-03
The written motion for a vote of no confidence in the Minister of Economic Affairs and Information Technology, Tiit Riisalo, submitted by 22 members of the Riigikogu.

Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary sitting.

The main confrontation is directed at the Minister of Economic Affairs and Information Technology, who is sharply criticized for ethical lapses and professional misconduct. The criticism is intense, demanding the minister's personal resignation in connection with the hiring of a lobbyist and the provision of political cover.
2024-05-29
First reading of the Bill amending the Land Tax Act (437 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The opposition is aimed at the government and the Ministry of Finance, leveling sharp criticism at both procedural flaws (the exclusion of stakeholders) and the substance of the policy itself (the shifting of costs onto local municipalities). The criticism is intense, accusing the state of squeezing funds and covering up a previous calculation error, and demanding that the ministry "put on sackcloth and ashes."
2024-05-29
Border security

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, information briefing

The confrontation is directed against the government's actions and lack of accountability, especially within the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Internal Affairs. The Prime Minister is being criticized for evading questions. There is also strong opposition to the actions of the Russian border guard, which is being called theft on Estonian territory, and to which the Estonian side should have reacted forcefully.
2024-05-28
Second Reading of the Bill for the Amendment of the Income Tax Act (416 SE)

15th Riigikogu, third session, plenary session

The standoff is directed at the government's tax policy and the actions of the rapporteur. The criticism targets both the substance (the reduction of pensioners' incomes and banking policy) and the procedure (the failure to answer colleagues' questions, including those regarding the discussion of Isamaa's proposals).
2024-05-15
The 2024 Report by the Minister of Climate on the Implementation of the State's Long-Term Development Strategy "Estonia 2035"

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The primary criticism is aimed at the actions of the Ministry of Climate and the ruling party, accusing them of a lack of clarity and shifting responsibility (for example, concerning CAP funding). The criticism is sharp, particularly regarding the inviolability of private property, where it is alleged that forest land is being seized from owners without offering any compensation or solution. The ministry is also criticized for its desire to dip its hand into another ministry's budget.
2024-05-15
Measures to boost the economy

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, press briefing

The main adversaries are the head of government (the Prime Minister) and the responsible minister, along with the ministry's deputy secretary general. The criticism targets both ethical issues (a conflict of interest regarding the Bold issue and supporting the political party) and ineffective policy (ignoring unemployment and importing additional labor). The Prime Minister's comment regarding unemployment is directly refuted.
2024-05-15
The situation in the country

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, press briefing

The main targets are the Prime Minister and the Minister of Finance, who are being criticized for delivering conflicting messages and using inaccurate data. The criticism is intense and focuses on the government's inability to resolve the economic crisis and the funding of local governments. The speaker contrasts the Prime Minister's promises with the Finance Minister's proposed austerity measures.
2024-05-14
First Reading of the Draft Basic Education Act (419 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The criticism is aimed at the drafters of the bill (the government/minister), citing unclear and impractical regulations. The opposition focuses on policy and procedure, highlighting the injustice of the explanatory memorandum regarding rural areas and the technical infeasibility of the new requirements.
2024-05-13
Inquiry Regarding the Alleged Vandalism of Andrei Shumakov's Car (No. 630)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session

The respondent to the inquiry is being opposed, with critics arguing that a substantive answer was not provided and that the respondent is incapable of addressing the wide-ranging security threat. The criticism is aimed at the government's inaction and the misplacement of priorities, given that they are focusing on a smaller threat instead of the larger one.
2024-05-06
A written motion submitted by 22 members of the Riigikogu for a vote of no confidence in the Minister of Education and Research, Kristina Kallas

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.

The main opponent is Minister of Education and Research Kristina Kallas, who is sharply criticized for both political decisions (school closures) and procedural errors (the exam blunder, shirking responsibility). The criticism is intense and aimed at a vote of no confidence, calling the minister's competence into question.
2024-05-06
Continuation of the first reading of the Draft Statement of the Riigikogu "On declaring the Moscow Patriarchate an institution supporting the military aggression of the Russian Federation" (Bill 420 AE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.

Not enough data
2024-05-02
Continuation of the first reading of the Bill on the Tax on Sweetened Beverages (418 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The main criticism is directed at the government and the coalition, accusing them of poor governance culture and disregard for procedural rules, especially concerning the absence of a preliminary legislative intent. The criticism is intense and political, emphasizing that the tax increases are solely aimed at filling the budget. The opposition is absolute, as the parliamentary group proposed rejecting the draft bill during the first reading.
2024-04-30
First reading of the Bill amending the Income Tax Act (416 SE)

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session.

The main confrontation is with the government, which is being criticized for violating legislative procedure by using the "steamroller" tactic. The criticism is directed at the fact that a significant tax law amendment is being pushed through as unjustifiably urgent, thereby avoiding an impact assessment.
2024-04-30
First Reading of the Bill on Amendments to the State Fees Act and Related Amendments to Other Acts (417 SE)

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session.

The objection is directed against the deviation from the topic, refusing to discuss raising the minimum wage in connection with the State Fees Act. The speaker challenges the government/minister to provide specific explanations regarding the new provisions (multilingual forms) and the costs of their implementation.
2024-04-30
First Reading of the Draft Act on the Amendment of the Penal Code and the Amendment of Other Related Acts (Increasing the Fine Unit) (Bill 415 SE)

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session.

The primary criticism is directed at the government and the bill's sponsor, who are accused of procedural unfairness and ignoring the opinions of interest groups. It is specifically highlighted that in the consultation table, the majority of opinions were marked "disregarded," including warnings issued by the judiciary. The criticism is strong and focuses on poor governance practices and a lack of transparency.
2024-04-29
Interpellation concerning the state funding of elective abortions (No. 606)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The respondent to the interpellation is being challenged and criticized for misinterpreting the opposition's position (specifically, the claim regarding mandatory childbirth). Furthermore, it is alleged that the respondent failed to answer the essential questions of the query concerning state-run awareness campaigns.
2024-04-29
Inquiry regarding pressure exerted by the European Central Bank on the Basel Committee (No. 628)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The resistance is aimed at regulatory inertia that could impede economic recovery. The speaker is looking for confirmation regarding potential disagreements within the European Central Bank Council, naming Poland, Hungary, Slovakia, and Germany as potential opponents, which suggests a desire to garner support for slowing down regulatory measures.
2024-04-17
Second Reading of the Draft Act (344 SE) on the Amendment of the Riigikogu Election Act and Related Amendment of Other Acts

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The standoff is aimed at the government coalition and the Constitutional Committee, who are criticized for imposing an insecure system, disregarding expert warnings, and ignoring public opinion. The Constitutional Committee is also criticized for its subjective decision regarding the bundling of amendment proposals, a move which is labeled as obstructionist.
2024-04-16
The Minister of Culture's 2024 Report on the Implementation of the State's Long-Term Development Strategy "Estonia 2035" (including the implementation of the "Estonian Sports Policy Fundamentals until 2030")

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The opposition's stance is directed against the government's policy, which is deemed centralizing and regionally detrimental. The criticism is policy-based, focusing on the removal of jobs and decision-making authority from county centers.
2024-04-16
Third Reading of the Draft Act amending the Health Insurance Act and related Acts (Prevention of Incapacity for Work) (Bill 377 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

There is no opposition; the speech focuses on supporting and clarifying the draft bill. Instead of criticism, the proposals of the Chamber of Bankruptcy Administrators were mentioned, which, although not relevant in the context of the current law, were promised to be addressed in the future.
2024-04-15
Inquiry concerning traffic management on national roads (No. 608)

Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary session

The primary opposition is aimed squarely at the Reform Party, which is being criticized for its past political actions, specifically its desire to abolish mandatory military service (conscription). The criticism is intense and fact-based, challenging the opponents' national defense narrative and demanding strict factual accuracy.
2024-04-15
Interpellation concerning the state of traffic in Estonia (No. 593)

Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary session

The opposition is aimed at the claims made by the government/minister regarding the adequacy of funding, pointing out that the very need for a formal query demonstrates the true complexity of the situation. The criticism is procedural and results-based, not personal.
2024-04-11
Discussion of the Crucial National Issue: "How to Ensure the Future of Veterinary Medicine"

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The primary criticism is leveled at the government, particularly the Ministry of Education and Research, which is accused of showing a complete lack of interest in veterinary studies. He criticizes a style of governance that is excessively focused on Excel spreadsheets while ignoring the critical needs of food security and rural communities. Furthermore, he takes issue with the stance of a ruling party member who deems living in the countryside detrimental to the environment.
2024-04-10
First reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic to Initiate Amendments to the Traffic Act with the Aim of Permitting Longer and Higher Gross Mass Vehicles in Traffic, Thereby Increasing the Efficiency of Road Transport" (Bill 278 OE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session

The primary criticism is aimed at the current government and its green transition policy, which is seen as detrimental to the economy due to the hike in fuel excise duty and road usage fees. The criticism is based on both policy and outcomes, arguing that the government’s actions are increasing the costs and environmental footprint of road transport.
2024-04-10
Cars

15th Estonian Parliament, third sitting, information briefing

The primary opposition is directed against the minister who advocates for the car tax, criticizing both his personal illegal conduct (driving a vehicle without a valid technical inspection) and the stalling of the legislative process. Unequal treatment before the law is emphasized by comparing the minister's actions with the legal proceedings faced by farmers.
2024-04-08
Interpellation Regarding the Unified Estonian School (No. 544)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The objection is directed at the respondent (the government representative), whose description of the situation is, in the speaker's estimation, inaccurate and conceals the reality. The criticism is politically intense and focuses on the unreasonableness of specific educational policy decisions (the closure of gymnasium sections).
2024-04-08
Interpellation Regarding the Need to Support Large Families (No. 339)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The speaker is in opposition to the government’s financial strategy, criticizing the income tax reform as an unreasonably costly priority that hinders the addressing of social needs. The critique is rooted in both policy and procedure, casting doubt on the concreteness and veracity of the government’s replies. The EKRE bank tax proposal is being offered as an alternative.
2024-04-04
Elections of the Riigikogu Board

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

Not enough data.
2024-04-03
Second Reading of the Bill on the Amendment of the Electronic Communications Act and the Nature Conservation Act (392 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session

A direct confrontation is not voiced, but the criticism is aimed at the insufficient preparatory work and consultation between the ministries and the Riigikogu committees. The criticism is purely procedural and political, not personal.
2024-04-03
First Reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic for Amending the Basic Schools and Upper Secondary Schools Act" (279 OE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The opposition is directed at the state’s ignorance concerning the professional qualifications of incoming individuals (specialists), as well as the policy that compels young children to study in a non-native language. Criticism is also leveled against those who introduce "pseudo-issues" concerning other interest groups into the discussion, thereby diverting focus from the Ukrainian crisis.
2024-04-03
First Reading of the Draft Resolution (274 OE) of the Riigikogu "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic to Prepare and Restore a Militarized Border Guard as a Separate Agency"

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session

Specific adversaries are not named, but the criticism is directed at those who allowed the process of restoring the former border guard to be left "unfinished."
2024-04-03
Country Life

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing

The criticism is directed at bureaucratic institutions (the Labour Inspectorate, PRIA) for violating deadlines, accumulating complexity, and a lack of clarity. There is strong opposition to ornithologists, whose actions (obtaining preliminary legal protection leading to a goose hunting ban) have directly damaged farmers' winter crops in Southern Estonia. The criticism is primarily policy- and procedure-based.
2024-04-02
First Reading of the Bill for the Amendment of the Food Act (378 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting

There is no direct opposition or criticism toward specific political groups; the questions presented are purely informative and clarifying.
2024-04-01
Interpellation concerning men of mobilization age from Ukraine in Estonia (No. 619)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The objection is directed at the current policy of the responsible authority (the respondent to the inquiry), which permits the verification of mobilization liability status on a voluntary basis. The criticism is procedural and policy-driven, focusing on the laxity of the requirements, which jeopardizes state control.
2024-04-01
Interpellation Regarding Mass Immigration (No. 617)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The criticism is directed at the positions taken by the respondent to the inquiry, particularly regarding the voluntary nature of declaring one's nationality, which is deemed hypocritical. The objection is both procedural and value-based, calling into question the respondent's understanding of the reliability of ethnic data.
2024-04-01
Interpellation to the Government of the Republic concerning plans to increase immigration (No. 614)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The criticism is aimed at the government's policy, specifically two ministers who want to increase immigration. A challenge is also being issued to the Social Democrats (the Socs) to ensure they stand up for local employment within the government. The criticism is based on both policy and procedure, focusing on the negative consequences of importing foreign labor.
2024-04-01
Interpellation concerning the consequences of reducing family benefits (No. 561)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The main criticism is directed at the Board of the Riigikogu, which is accused of procedural errors and insufficient diligence in verifying the presence of rapporteurs. Furthermore, the official responding to the interpellation is criticized for a lack of knowledge and for answering questions with further questions. There is also opposition to the viewpoint that pits working people against childcare providers.
2024-04-01
Interpellation Concerning the Undermining of the State's Foundations (No. 523)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The primary criticism is aimed at the government or the opposition, which refused to hold a referendum on redefining the definition of marriage. The criticism is intense and procedural, accusing opponents of fearing a popular vote and ignoring the will of the people.
2024-03-20
First reading of the Draft Act amending the Riigikogu Member's Status Act (339 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The main criticism is directed at the legislative committee, which is accused of searching for reasons why they should not support the draft bill. Objections that eliminating expense reimbursements would interfere with the deputy's work, such as bringing children here, are also being refuted. The criticism is procedural and policy-based, not personal.
2024-03-20
First Reading of the Draft Act amending the Riigikogu Election Act, the Local Government Council Election Act, and the European Parliament Election Act (292 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The main opponents are the rapporteur, who is accused of being unfamiliar with the explanatory memorandum, and the electoral commission, whose decision not to abolish e-voting is considered unfounded. Criticism is directed both at procedural shortcomings and at the political decision, which ignores security risks and the resentment of commission members. Furthermore, there are hints that the e-voting system favors the Reform Party.
2024-03-20
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amending the Atmospheric Air Protection Act (393 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The criticism is aimed at the drafters of the draft legislation due to the poor quality and illogical nature of the legal text. The opposition is purely procedural and substantive, not personal, nor is it directed at specific political groups.
2024-03-20
Estonian national culture

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, press briefing.

Criticism has been leveled against the decisions made by the Ministry of Culture and the head choreographer of the dance festival, specifically regarding the exclusion of children's groups from Ida-Virumaa and the centralization of central libraries. The opposition is rooted in policy and procedural concerns, emphasizing the negative impact on the regions and the status of cultural workers. The elimination of regional jobs resulting from centralization is facing particularly harsh criticism.
2024-03-20
Environmental Friendliness and Taxes

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, press briefing.

The opposition is aimed at the government in its entirety and specific ministers (the Ministry of Climate, the Minister of Economic Affairs, the Prime Minister, and the Minister of Regional Affairs), who are being criticized for strategic inaction. The criticism is grounded in policy and procedure, highlighting the contradictory nature of the government’s activities and its inability to safeguard strategic investments.
2024-03-13
First Reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic for Increasing the Birth Rate of the Estonian People" (283 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting.

The main adversary is the current coalition government, which is sharply criticized for its family policy (the removal of benefits for large families) and its tax policy (the car tax, the sugar tax). The criticism is policy-based and intense, accusing the government of going after Estonian families and reducing the sense of security among young people. No willingness to compromise with the government has been expressed; instead, there is a demand for the Riigikogu (Parliament) to provide clear direction.
2024-03-13
First Reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic to Lower the Value Added Tax on Foodstuffs and Medicines to 5 Percent" (272 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting.

Criticism is aimed at the government's tax policy (raising VAT, the sugar tax) and, more broadly, the European Union's green policy. The opposition is policy- and value-driven, emphasizing that tax hikes and regulations directly harm consumers and producers. They oppose policies that force consumers to bear the cost of price increases.
2024-03-11
Interpellation concerning Estonia's critical demographic situation (No. 597)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session

The opposition is directed at the head of government and a specific minister, who is personally criticized as being hostile toward children and families. The government is also accused of delaying matters (the creation of a commission) and making poor political and economic decisions (tax hikes, benefit cuts).
2024-03-06
First Reading of the Draft Act Amending the Local Government Council Election Act (290 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The primary criticism is aimed at the Reform Party, which is accused of co-opting EKRE's ideas and dragging out the process of revoking voting rights by limiting it only to Russian and Belarusian citizens. The priorities of the government and the representative of the Ministry of Justice are also being questioned, asking whether they are guided by the coalition agreement or the interests of the Estonian state.
2024-03-06
First Reading of the Bill to Amend the Local Government Council Election Act and Other Acts (246 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

No direct opponents or specific groups are criticized; instead, the criticism is aimed at the inefficiency of the current system and its tendency to generate labor conflicts. The speaker points out that the draft legislation falls under the Riigikogu's right to self-determination and should not involve the government.
2024-03-06
First Reading of the Draft Act Amending the Law Enforcement Act (163 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The criticism is aimed at the rapporteur, whose personal perception is declared irrelevant in the political debate. The work of the commission is also indirectly criticized, with reference to the fact that important topics (such as integration) were not discussed there.
2024-03-06
First reading of the Draft Act (379 SE) on the Amendment of the Tax Information Exchange Act, the Taxation Procedure Act, and the Income Tax Act.

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

There is no criticism; the speaker is addressing the minister to seek clarification, not confrontation. The focus is on procedural accuracy, not political attack.
2024-03-06
First reading of the Draft Act on the Ratification of the Agreement between the Government of the Republic of Estonia and the Government of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan for the Avoidance of Double Taxation with respect to Taxes on Income and the Prevention of Tax Evasion and Fiscal Fraud, and the Protocol thereto (368 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The objection is directed at the deficiencies in the draft documentation presented by the government (or the minister who signed the agreement). The criticism is procedural and focuses on a factual error, rather than the content of the agreement as a whole.
2024-03-06
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Health Insurance Act and Consequently Amendments to Other Acts (Prevention of Incapacity for Work) (Bill 377 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

There is not enough data. The speaker does not express opposition or criticize any group or policy, but instead focuses on the details of implementing the supportive bill.
2024-03-06
First Reading of the Draft Act on the Ratification of the Agreement on Air Services between the Government of the Republic of Estonia and the Government of the Republic of Korea (Bill 357 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

There is no oppositional stance, as the speaker is asking clarifying questions about the necessity of the draft bill, rather than criticizing opponents or political groups.
2024-03-06
First reading of the Bill (359 SE) for the Act supplementing the Act on the Organization of the Energy Sector and the Act on Environmental Impact Assessment and Environmental Management System

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

Direct opponents are not criticized, but strong skepticism is voiced regarding the positive economic impacts presented in the explanatory memorandum of the draft bill. The criticism is aimed at the fulfillment of the bill's objectives and the transparency of the regulatory amendments (KMH).
2024-03-05
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Organization of the Energy Sector Act and Other Acts (Bill 356 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session

Insufficient data. The speaker is posing questions to the person responsible for the bill to get clarifications regarding the finances and definitions, but is neither criticizing nor opposing any specific political group.
2024-03-05
2024 Report by the Minister of Education and Research on the Implementation of the State's Long-Term Development Strategy "Eesti 2035" (Education Reforms)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The main criticism is aimed at the government and the Ministry of Education, targeting the poor execution of reforms and procedural errors, such as the repeated delay of teachers' salaries. The criticism is intense, with the delays being labeled "incomprehensible" and "unjustifiable." The opposition is focused both on the implementation of the policy itself and the lack of transparency surrounding the financial strategy.
2024-03-04
Inquiry regarding the promotion of gender equality and equal treatment in private and family life (No. 268)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The criticism targets the expansion of the Equal Opportunities Commissioner's scope of activity, particularly concerning intervention in family matters and engagement with the climate law. The opposition is both institutional and political, raising doubts about the limits of the Commissioner's mandate and the relevance of their actions.
2024-03-04
Interpellation concerning the impact of the motor vehicle tax (No. 610)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The opposition is directed at the government's planned tax policy, which is being criticized for its lack of differentiation and the potential expansion of taxation (property taxes, watercraft). The criticism is policy- and substance-based, demanding answers regarding the future scope of these taxes.
2024-03-04
Inquiry Concerning the Taxation of Residential Land (No. 527)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The main criticism is aimed at the policies of the Regional Minister and the government, which are accused of redistributing poverty and generating ambiguous tax outcomes. The criticism is policy-driven, focusing specifically on the negative net impact of the tax reforms on local municipalities.
2024-03-04
Interpellation concerning the introduction of the vehicle tax (No. 304)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The primary objection targets the justifications provided by the minister and the government for the car tax, especially the assertion that the tax solves the problem of vehicles whose registration entries have been suspended in the register. The criticism is based on policy and practical considerations, recommending that "some other measure" be found to resolve the issue.
2024-03-04
Interpellation concerning the rise in the cost of living in Estonia (No. 599)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The main adversary is the respondent/government, whose policies are criticized for taxing people into poverty, and whose claims about supporting national defense are being intensely refuted. The criticism is policy-based, focusing on funding methods and the inaccuracy of the government's narrative. The opposition is direct and uncompromising.
2024-03-04
Interpellation Regarding the Temporary Taxation of Banks' Excess Profits (No. 595)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The primary adversary is the government, which is sharply criticized for political decisions that harm families while leaving banks untaxed. The criticism is policy-driven and intense, focusing on the unfair allocation of funds and the government's failure to utilize solutions that would benefit the nation.
2024-02-22
First Reading of the Draft Act Amending the Local Government Council Election Act (287 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting

The main opponent under fire is the Social Democrats ("Sotsid"), whose arguments are considered bizarre and irrelevant, especially their preoccupation with historical individual voting results. The criticism is intense, targeting both the opponents' logic and their procedural focus.
2024-02-21
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Value Added Tax Act (286 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The opposition is directed against the government's tax policy, criticizing the tax hikes and their negative impact on the economy and the agricultural sector. The criticism is policy- and results-based, highlighting that the tax increase has failed to secure the expected revenues. Separately, the regional minister (a representative of the Social Democrats) is criticized for failing to find solutions to the agricultural crisis.
2024-02-21
Internal Security

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing

The opposition is aimed at the government, which is being criticized for failing to present a plan for managing mass immigration. The criticism is rooted in policy and procedure, demanding that the government take concrete steps and make budgetary commitments to guarantee internal security. Furthermore, the speaker directly challenges the minister’s factual assertions regarding the wishes of the Ukrainian president.
2024-02-19
Inquiry regarding the reconstruction of Ukraine (No. 203)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting

Insufficient data
2024-02-15
Debate on the matter of national importance initiated by the Isamaa faction, titled "Estonia in Economic Recession. What is to be done?"

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The main criticism is aimed at the current coalition, demanding that they avoid tax hikes (excise duties, car tax) and mitigate the impact of existing taxes (VAT). The criticism is strictly policy-driven, focusing on the negative effect that tax increases have on consumption.
2024-02-08
First Reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "On the Special Labeling and Sale of Insects and Insect-Containing Foods and Products" (222 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.

Criticism is aimed at the government's inaction, which has limited itself to non-binding recommendations instead of mandatory regulation. The position of the Chancellery of the Riigikogu is also being challenged, specifically their view that special labeling interferes with entrepreneurial freedom, with critics emphasizing that such labeling actually ensures consumer freedom of choice. The Reform Party is mentioned with a slight provocation regarding the stir caused by insects.
2024-02-07
First Reading of the Bill (217 SE) to Amend the Income Tax Act

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting.

There is no opposition. The speaker is posing questions to the presenter and the presiding officer to obtain information and clarify the procedure, not to offer criticism.
2024-02-07
The Consequences of the Green Transition

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing

The main opposition is aimed at the policies of the government and the prime minister, who are accused of embracing the "green madness" and damaging Estonian production. The criticism is political, focusing specifically on the increase in bureaucracy and the closure of production facilities in Narva and the oil shale industry. The government is also criticized for its selectivity regarding which issues Estonia chooses to take a leading role on in Europe.
2024-02-05
Inquiry concerning the construction of indoor football arenas (No. 498)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting

Direct opposition is not voiced, but there is criticism regarding previous state funding restrictions and the strict adherence to deadlines, which prevented the Jõhvi project from being carried out. The criticism is aimed at procedures and the government's inability to increase funding, not at individuals.
2024-02-05
Inquiry concerning immigration (No. 588)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting

The confrontation is directed at the government's actions, criticizing or questioning the effectiveness of immigration management. The criticism is policy- and results-based, focusing on what the government is doing to support the non-working 47%.
2024-01-25
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Emergency Situation Act (124 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The main opponents are the government and the commission, who are being criticized for rejecting the opposition's draft bill without delving into its substance, citing new legislative amendments planned for the future as their justification. The criticism is both procedural and political, stressing that the government is prioritizing political opposition over national security. Furthermore, the government's tax policy, which increases the burden on farmers, is also under fire.
2024-01-24
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Income Tax Act (Bill 180 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

Insufficient data
2024-01-24
First reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Alcohol, Tobacco, Fuel, and Electricity Excise Duty Act (Bill 126 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

Insufficient data
2024-01-24
Security

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing

The confrontation is directed at the government and the prime minister, demanding accountability and concrete steps to ensure food security. The criticism is rooted in both policy and action, highlighting a potential deficiency in the government's plans for crisis situations.
2024-01-22
Inquiry Concerning the Imposition of the Motor Vehicle Tax (No. 310)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The primary opposition is directed against the car tax policy proposed by the Minister of Finance and the government. The criticism is both political and logic-based, calling into question the tax's objectives as well as the planned compensation mechanisms involving social benefits. The speaker demands that ministries lead by example when transitioning to more economical cars.
2024-01-22
Interpellation concerning the underfunding of state infrastructure (No. 334)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The primary conflict is aimed at the minister and the government, who are being criticized for setting the wrong priorities regarding infrastructure funding. The criticism is policy-driven, focusing on the underfunding of roads and the channeling of funds into Rail Baltic.
2024-01-22
Interpellation concerning the environmental impact of mandatory building renovation and citizens' ability to pay (No. 123)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The primary criticism is aimed at the government and the minister for implementing the policy of mandatory renovation, which is deemed unreasonable and overly burdensome for citizens. The criticism is policy- and procedure-based, questioning even the legal foundations of the compulsion and the continuous alteration of energy labels. The opposition is intense, offering full support to the decision-making autonomy of housing cooperatives instead of state intervention.
2024-01-17
First Reading of the Bill for the Amendment of the Income Tax Act (131 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

No data available.
2024-01-17
First reading of the Bill amending the Income Tax Act (235 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

Not enough data.
2024-01-17
First reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Income Tax Act (153 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

Insufficient data
2024-01-17
Draft Bill Amending the Income Tax Act (118 SE), First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

There is not enough data.
2024-01-17
First Reading of the Draft Act Amending the Customs Act (350 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The criticism is aimed at the government's activities, particularly concerning the lack of transparency in the procedures for handling legislative packages and the social impact resulting from state budget austerity measures. The speaker also indirectly disputes the alleged complete clarity held by coalition members, defending the right of those posing questions to receive information.
2024-01-17
Defending the Eastern border

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing

The standoff is directed against the actions of the government or the responsible minister, criticizing their failure to ensure adequate security and defense along Lake Peipus. The criticism is policy-based, focusing on deficiencies in monitoring and response capabilities.
2024-01-17
Educational Issues in Estonia

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing

The primary criticism is aimed at the activities of the Ministry of Education and Research, specifically concerning the rationale behind the proposal to close Toila Gymnasium and the classification of the information request for 75 years. The criticism is procedural and calls for greater transparency and an improved political decision-making process.
2024-01-16
First Reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu (104 OE), titled "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic to Remove the So-Called Bronze Soldier Statue from Public Space"

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The primary opposition is aimed at those who employ the "peace of the grave" argument to obstruct the removal of Soviet-era monuments from public space. The criticism is intense, accusing opponents of justifying inaction and allowing the glorification of the Soviet occupation and Russian power at the memorial site.
2024-01-15
Inquiry concerning the misappropriation of "Slava Ukraini" funds and the related investigation (No. 578)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.

The main criticism is aimed at the inaction and incompetence of the authorities leading the investigation, suggesting a possible cover-up. The criticism is procedural, focusing on the lack of specific investigative steps (searches, seizure of evidence) in the case involving Johanna-Maria Lehtme.
2024-01-15
Interpellation regarding the capability to ensure internal security in the new situation where uncontrolled immigration has made the people of Estonia worried about their property and their lives (No. 536)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.

The criticism is directed at the government's actions (or inaction) regarding the assurance of domestic security and the management of social problems related to immigration. This opposition is policy-based, focusing on the lack of statistics and concrete action plans.
2024-01-15
Interpellation regarding the necessity and construction of Rail Baltic (No. 262)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.

The main opposition is aimed at the official claims of the government and the project, especially regarding Rail Baltic's financial management and regional benefits. The criticism is policy-driven, focusing on the project's negative impact on road transport and the country's internal regional distribution.
2024-01-15
Interpellation concerning the demographic crisis and its resolution (No. 232)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.

The main opponent is the prime minister and the government, who are being sharply criticized for their policies (tax hikes). The criticism is policy-driven and intense, accusing the government of "taxing the people and businesses to death," which threatens the public's sense of security.
2024-01-15
Inquiry on Immigration (No. 133)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.

The opposition is directed at the positive assessments of integration success provided by the speaker (the government representative). The criticism is policy- and outcome-based, citing as examples the events that took place in Town Hall Square and the unusual celebrations.
2024-01-15
Interpellation concerning the enhancement of the wartime indirect fire capability of the Defense Forces (No. 72)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.

The primary opposition is aimed at the government's policy regarding the allocation of 1.2 billion euros to Ukraine. Critics argue this represents a failure in setting priorities, coming at the expense of Estonia's defense capabilities. The criticism is rooted in both policy and budgetary concerns.
2024-01-15
Interpellation concerning the unified Estonian school (No. 13)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.

The opposition is aimed at the government (the prime minister), but the criticism is conceptual, focusing on the lack of clarity in the policy rather than constituting a personal attack. The core of the confrontation is the emphasis placed on the absence of a clear definition for the unified school.
2024-01-11
First reading of the Bill for the Amendment of the Vital Statistics Registration Act (106 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The opposition is aimed at the organization of the bill's proceedings, particularly regarding the question of whether vital statistics acts fall within the competence of the Social Affairs Committee. The criticism is procedural and is directed at the bill's sponsors or the government, which is responsible for defining the ministers' areas of responsibility.
2024-01-10
First Reading of the Bill on Amendments to the Value Added Tax Act (245 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The opposition is indirect, aimed at those who criticize the Riigikogu's work pace or volume ("nobody can say that we aren't doing our jobs"). There are no specific opponents, political groupings, or political attacks present.
2024-01-10
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Value Added Tax Act (149 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

Insufficient data.
2024-01-10
The Situation and Developments of Nordica and Associated Companies

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing

The opposition is aimed at the actions taken by the government or the responsible minister in managing the Nordica sales process. The criticism is procedural, focusing on decisions being made based on incomplete information (specifically, the lack of a final report) and the resulting threat to transparency.