By Agendas: Jaak Aab

Total Agendas: 110

Fully Profiled: 110

All Categories Political Position Topic Expertise Rhetorical Style Activity Patterns Opposition Stance Collaboration Style Regional Focus Economic Views Social Issues Legislative Focus
2025-10-16
Debate on the nationally important issue "Why is food expensive?", initiated by the Estonian Centre Party faction.

XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting

The speaking style is analytical and critical, highlighting the urgency of the situation due to the ongoing inflation spiral. Formal language and logical argumentation are employed, drawing on expert recommendations, but also containing personal criticism aimed at the opponent's "rigidity."
View Profile View Agenda
2025-10-15
First Reading of the Draft Act Amending the Law on the Election of the President of the Republic (684 SE)

The 15th Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting

The rhetorical style is formal, respectful, and purely interrogative, addressing both the presiding officer and the Speaker of the Riigikogu with deference. The argumentation is logical and grounded in facts and historical data concerning changes in the composition of the electoral college.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-10-15
Discussion of the state issue of significant national importance initiated by the Committee on European Union Affairs: "Estonia's Choices and Opportunities in the European Union's 2028–2034 Long-Term Budget"

The 15th Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting

The style is formal and polite, beginning with thanking the Chair and the rapporteur for their substantive contribution. The address is structured around a logical question, which is grounded in statistical facts concerning regional disparities, balancing the data with a clear political proposal.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-10-14
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Public Transport Act (725 SE)

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The rhetorical style is formal and interrogative, aimed at obtaining specific factual confirmation from the minister. The speaker is respectful ("Honorable Chair! Dear Minister!") and pragmatic, justifying the question by citing the lack of pressure on the agenda and the significance of the topic.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-10-13
Interpellation concerning the necessity and timeliness of establishing a general quiet period during the breeding season (No. 804)

15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The rhetorical style is formal and businesslike, respectfully addressing both the chairman and the minister ("Esteemed Chairman," "Mr. Minister, dear Andres"). The tone is slightly critical yet constructive, emphasizing the logical necessity of legislative action to address the problem of biodiversity loss. The speaker frames their concern as a question, seeking specific confirmation regarding the substance of the draft legislation.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-10-13
Inquiry concerning the revenue base of local governments (No. 802)

15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The rhetorical style is formal, respectful, and analytical, addressing the Minister and the Director directly. The address is logic-based, focusing on the presentation of political mechanisms and documented facts (negotiation protocols, GDP percentage). The tone is concerned regarding the insufficient funding of local governments for fulfilling new security tasks.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-10-13
First reading of the Draft Act on the Amendment of the Act on Simplified Taxation of Business Income and the Income Tax Act, and the Act on the Repeal of the Security Tax Act and the Amendment of the Income Tax Act (Bill 734 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The style is formal and characteristic of parliamentary debate, encompassing both direct questions posed to the minister and corrections regarding the party's official stances. The first speaker employs the arguments of specific interest groups (namely, farmers' representatives) in their reasoning, whereas the second speaker concentrates on clarifying and defending the party's positions against accusations, utilizing a logical appeal.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-10-09
Discussion of the Crucial National Issue 'The Future of the Estonian Economy'

15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The rhetorical style is analytical, serious, and urgent, emphasizing the need for faster and better solutions to boost the economy. Both logical arguments (economic losses in healthcare) and emotional appeals (the public's fears regarding security) are employed. The speaker refers to their previous experience in government and as a minister, which adds authority.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-10-09
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Value-Added Tax Act (661 SE)

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The rhetorical style is critical and interrogative, particularly concerning the finance minister's assertions, which are deemed "very strange." Logical argumentation is employed, concentrating on the policy's actual economic impact and the absence of long-term perspectives. The tone remains formal, focusing specifically on the deficiencies in data and analysis.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-10-08
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Planning Act and Other Related Acts (683 SE)

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The style is constructive, practical, and somewhat urgent, emphasizing the need for quicker solutions in a dynamically changing world. Both political arguments (reducing bureaucracy) and references to earlier "beautiful dreams" regarding the creation of a unified information base are employed. The speaker maintains a formal tone, addressing the Chairman, the Minister, members of the Riigikogu, and the people of Estonia.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-10-08
Public Finance

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Information Hour

The style is analytical, critical, and formal, making it appropriate for submitting a parliamentary question (e.g., "Honorable Chairman"). The speaker relies on logical arguments, detailing the impact of VAT across the entire value chain, and highlights the public's will (citing over 100,000 signatures). Furthermore, the speaker preempts and directly counters the government's anticipated objections (such as the security tax or the presence of Social Democrats in the cabinet).
View Profile View Agenda
2025-10-07
First Reading of the 2026 State Budget Bill (737 SE)

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The rhetorical style is formal, analytical, and coherent, focusing on logical arguments and citing external (IMF) authority. The tone is critical, particularly regarding the current tax system and the government's long-term planning, but remains objective while posing questions and continuing the debate.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-10-07
Interpellation concerning the unspent budget funds of the Ministry of Education and Research (No. 805)

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The rhetorical style is formal, direct, and interrogative, respectfully addressing both the Chairman and the Minister. The appeal relies purely on logic and facts, centering on the clarification of specific budget figures and official government statements (i.e., remarks made during the press conference). The tone is neutral yet demanding, seeking a clear answer to the financial query.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-10-06
Interpellation regarding failure in Basic School final examinations (No. 800)

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The rhetorical style is formal and focused on questions, addressing the minister directly (Dear Minister!). The address is logical and analytical, highlighting the practical and financial obstacles associated with implementing the law. The tone is concerned but non-confrontational, seeking clarification regarding the promised earmarked funding.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-10-06
Interpellation concerning the insufficient state funding of school meals and the resulting inequality (No. 797)

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The style is formal and respectful ("esteemed chairman," "respected minister"), employing historical narrative and international comparisons for the purpose of logical persuasion. The speaker frames their position as a consultative question, urging the establishment of a similar legal solution in Estonia.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-10-06
Interpellation concerning the transfer of Swedish criminals to Estonia (No. 803)

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The speaker's style is formal and directly questioning, addressing both the presiding officer and the minister respectfully. The rhetoric is logic-based, focusing on summarizing the minister's previous response and subsequently demanding specific data. The tone is analytical and demanding.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-10-06
First reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Motor Vehicle Tax Act (694 SE)

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The style is formal, addressing the esteemed Chairman and Minister, but shifts to being defensive and explanatory, particularly when defending the position of the Social Democratic Party. Both logical arguments (the causes of the budget deficit) and historical context ("in the interest of historical truth") are utilized to refute the opponents' accusations.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-25
Debate on the key national issue "The impact of price rises on economic competitiveness and people's livelihoods: What to do?"

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session

Uses the form of questions to express their position, which is a diplomatic and investigative approach. The tone is polite and formal, starting with expressions of gratitude. Relies on facts and numerical comparisons, using logical argumentation instead of emotional appeals.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-24
The Regional Affairs and Agricultural Minister's 2025 presentation on the implementation of the state's long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035"

Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.

It uses a direct and businesslike tone, starting politely ("Thank you, esteemed Chairman!") but quickly moving to the specific problem. Urgency is emphasized through repeated references to damage ("irreparable damage," "yet again," "again"), and it concludes with a clear, practical question regarding concrete steps.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-23
Inquiry regarding the cessation of number plate recognition cameras (no. 793)

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session

Employs a polite yet resolute questioning style, beginning with a formal acknowledgement ("Thank you, esteemed Chairman! Dear Minister!"). Poses structured questions, seeking confirmation of their understanding of the process, and demands specific answers regarding the decision-makers.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-22
Inquiry Regarding the Bringing of Swedish Prisoners to Estonia (No. 792)

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session

The speaker adopts a polite yet decisive tone, opening with an expression of respect and employing rhetorical questions. The style is more diplomatic than confrontational, but it includes a clear challenge for the Prime Minister to clarify their position.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-22
Request for information regarding the establishment of a business council and the potential conflicts of interest of its members (no. 788)

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session

The speaker frames their criticism as questions, thereby creating a doubtful and skeptical tone. The style is polite yet sharp, utilizing rhetorical questions to cast doubt on the legitimacy of the prime minister's actions.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-18
Bank of Estonia 2024 Report

15th Estonian Parliament, 6th sitting, plenary session.

It employs a polite and formal tone, addressing the recipients as "Esteemed Chairman" and "Respected President of the Bank of Estonia." The style is analytical and fact-based, relying on numerical comparisons and concrete examples. Questions are presented in a constructive spirit.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-15
Inquiry regarding the accessibility of secondary education in Estonia (no. 799)

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting

They employ a polite and constructive approach, addressing individuals as both "Esteemed Chairman" and "Dear Minister." Questions are presented factually, incorporating personal experiences as a resident of Harju County, and criticism is balanced with the pursuit of practical solutions.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-15
Inquiry Regarding Differences in Teacher Salaries (no. 790)

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting

Uses a polite and constructive approach, addressing the minister respectfully. Questions are presented diplomatically, employing figurative language ("figuratively speaking") and structured argumentation. The style is focused more on cooperation than confrontation.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-10
First reading of the draft law on civil crisis and state defense

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session

Adopts an appreciative and constructive tone, starting speeches with expressions of gratitude and recognition. The style is inquisitive and analytical, focusing on raising practical problems. They speak from personal experience and use concrete examples to illustrate the shortcomings of the legislation.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-09
The Minister of Defence's 2025 presentation on the implementation of the state's long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035"

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session.

It employs a cautious and diplomatic tone, beginning with a clear caveat ("Please do not interpret this as meaning this doesn't need to be done"). The style is fact-based and constructive, focusing on procedural matters rather than personal accusations.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-08
Inquiry Regarding the Development of Nuclear Energy in Estonia (No. 786)

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session

The speaking style is analytical and fact-based, yet remains accessible and explanatory. The speaker employs a balance of logical arguments and concrete examples, deliberately avoiding emotional rhetoric. The style is rather instructive and cautionary, utilizing expressions like "predicting from coffee grounds" and "shaking ashes on one's head," which makes complex topics more understandable.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-08
Inquiry regarding the loss of essential banking services from county centers (no. 773)

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session

The speaking style is direct and critical, utilizing personal experiences and concrete examples to bolster the argument. Irony is employed when describing the Center Party's election advertisement, which is labeled an "anti-ad." The tone is professional yet sharp, particularly when criticizing the opposition party.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-08
Inquiry regarding regulations concerning end-of-life issues (no. 766)

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session

Uses a polite and formal tone, addressing recipients as "esteemed chairman" and "respected minister." The style is structured and analytical, utilizing logical argumentation and specific questions to gain clarity.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-04
Chair implementation

15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu

Uses an official and polite tone, always beginning with the respectful address "Honored Chairman/Presiding Officer." The argumentation is fact-based and logical, relying on concrete data and examples. The style is direct and clear, especially on critical issues such as energy security. Speeches are always concluded with a brief expression of "Aitäh!" or "Tänan!" (Thank you!).
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-18
Draft law amending the Basic Education and Upper Secondary Education Act and the Vocational Education Institutions Act (director certification and teacher career model) (653 SE) - first reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

He/She employs a diplomatic and inquisitive approach, beginning with a positive note regarding the education agreement process. The concerns of local municipalities are highlighted in a neutral manner, concluding with a direct question posed to the minister to seek confirmation.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-18
Competition Act

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing

It employs a defensive and explanatory tone, often starting with "clarifications" or "corrections." The rhetoric is argumentative and rich in detail, relying on specific facts and procedures. The style is formal, yet emotionally charged, particularly when presenting criticism regarding the actions of the current government.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-17
Draft law amending the Competition Act and, in consequence thereof, amending other laws (609 SE) – third reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session

The speaker employs an emotional and accusatory tone, labeling the events a "political chicken dance" and referencing "influence operations." They combine fact-based arguments with personal accusations, utilizing dramatic language ("insanely huge fines," "intimidation"). The style is direct and confrontational, including direct appeals to colleagues.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-12
A written request for a vote of no confidence in Justice and Digital Minister Liisa-Ly Pakostale, submitted by 42 members of the Riigikogu.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The speaker employs a direct and confrontational approach, demanding clear "yes or no" answers. He emphasizes propriety and cultural refinement in communication, yet simultaneously uses sharp expressions such as "a minister by his word, an ox by its horn," and demands the placing of a hand over the heart [as a sign of sincerity].
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-12
Draft Law Amending the Employment Contracts Act and Other Acts (602 SE) – First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The speaking style is direct and critical, yet polite, employing a personal address to the minister ("Anna andeks, Erkki"). He combines personal experience with factual examples and utilizes rhetorical questions to strengthen the argument. The tone is authoritative, but not aggressive.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-12
Continuation of the second reading of the bill (541 SE) amending the Planning Act and other laws (accelerating the adoption of renewable energy).

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

It employs an official, fact-based, and detailed presentation style. The discourse is structured and sequential, focusing on procedural aspects and the clarification of technical matters. The tone is neutral and highly informative, avoiding emotional expressions and relying primarily on logical arguments and concrete data.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-11
Second reading of the draft law on the state's supplementary budget for 2025 (651 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

Uses a confrontational and critical tone, particularly aimed at the Reform Party. It employs comparative rhetoric, drawing attention to contradictions (such as Rae municipality versus Tallinn regarding kindergarten fees). The speaker relies on facts and specific examples, but also injects emotional charge through accusations. Speeches are often concluded with rhetorical questions or direct challenges.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-11
Continuation of the second reading of the draft law amending the Competition Act and, in connection therewith, amending other laws (609 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The speaker employs an emotional and combative tone, blending it with fact-based arguments. They utilize metaphors ("a dance around the steam boiler") and rhetorical questions to underscore their position. The style is direct and critical, particularly regarding the opposition forces.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-10
Draft law amending the Competition Act and, in consequence, amending other laws (609 SE) - second reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.

The speaker's style is polite and formal, utilizing traditional forms of address such as "Esteemed Chair" and "Respected Minister." They pose questions in a constructive tone, acknowledging the limits of their knowledge and seeking clarification. The rhetoric is fact-based rather than emotional, focusing on specific procedural issues.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-05
Discussion of the significant national issue initiated by the Economics Committee: "How to increase productivity in the Estonian economy?"

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session.

It uses a moderate, analytical tone, combining fact-based arguments with personal judgment. It poses questions to the audience and employs rhetorical devices ("How to make this leap?"). The style is formal yet accessible, including both technical terms and clear explanations. It concludes with constructive recommendations.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-05
Draft law amending the Road Traffic Act (616 SE) - first reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The tone used is polite and constructive, beginning with expressions of gratitude and praise for the presenter's comprehensive overview. The phrasing is clear and direct, focusing on posing practical questions rather than attempting rhetorical influence.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-03
The Minister of Public Administration's 2025 presentation on the implementation of the state's long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035"

Fifteenth Riigikogu, fifth session, plenary session

The speaker employs a fact-based and questioning approach, emphasizing the need for specific data and the obtaining of clear answers. Their style is polite yet determined, utilizing formal addresses ("Thank you, esteemed Chairman! Respected Minister!") while simultaneously remaining focused on the specific question.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-03
Inquiry Regarding the Establishment of Tallinn Hospital (no 762)

15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session

The speaking style is polite and constructive, employing the formal addresses "Esteemed Chairman" and "Dear Minister." The argumentation is logical, relying on facts and experience. It concludes with a direct question, anticipating a specific answer, which demonstrates a goal-oriented approach.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-03
Inquiry Regarding the Pihlakodu Case and the Safety of Care Homes (no. 750)

15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session

Adopts a polite and constructive approach, addressing the Minister respectfully. The questions are presented analytically, relying on facts regarding the implementation of the care reform, and concrete examples are used to support their arguments.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-02
Inquiry regarding the qualification requirements for youth workers (no. 745)

15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session

Adopts a polite and constructive approach, addressing the minister respectfully. The questions are presented in a logical sequence, moving from qualifications to the valuation of the work. The argument relies on practical reasoning and concrete examples.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-02
First reading of the draft law on the state's supplementary budget for 2025 (651 SE)

15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session

The style is straightforward and formal, utilizing polite forms of address ("esteemed chairman," "respected minister"). The address itself is structured and concentrates on specific issues, avoiding emotional or rhetorical techniques.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-20
Draft law amending the Enterprise Income Tax Simplification Act, the Security Tax Act, and the Income Tax Act (645 SE) – First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

He/She uses a polite yet firm tone, beginning with the respectful forms of address "Esteemed Chairman" and "Dear Minister." Questions and criticism are presented factually, relying on specific figures and examples, while simultaneously maintaining a constructive approach.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-20
Inquiry Regarding Electrical Power Generation Capacities (No. 746)

15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.

The speaker employs a factual and argumentative approach, combining statistical data with emotional appeals. The style is direct and critical, especially when engaging with the opposition. They use historical comparisons (the Luddite movement) and emphasize urgency by mentioning specific deadlines.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-19
Inquiry Regarding Estonian Environmental Policy (No. 743)

15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.

They employ a moderate and analytical approach, posing questions in an accusatory rather than aggressive manner. They rely on facts and data but express clear concern about the future, utilizing rhetorical questions to strengthen their argument.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-19
An inquiry regarding the illegal alteration of the order of protection of natural objects (no. 738)

15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.

Uses a polite and constructive approach, addressing the minister respectfully. Relies on facts and data, but also expresses clear concern. Poses questions with a suggestive rather than accusatory tone, seeking dialogue and solutions.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-19
Inquiry regarding labor productivity, Estonia's competitiveness, and cheap labor (no. 742)

15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.

The speaking style is polite and respectful, starting with expressions of gratitude and utilizing formal address. The speaker uses personal experiences from meetings with entrepreneurs to lend weight to their arguments, and concludes with a rhetorical question that emphasizes their concern.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-15
The Minister of Education and Research's 2025 presentation on the implementation of the state's long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035"

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

Uses a diplomatic and constructive tone, starting politely ("Thank you, esteemed Chairman!"). Presents questions factually, emphasizing their support for national defense before posing critical questions. The rhetorical style is direct yet respectful.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-14
Draft law amending the Electricity Market Act (556 SE) – third reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session

The speaker uses a factual and explanatory tone, starting with a slightly ironic remark about the mandate. They balance technical explanations with practical examples and use direct statements ("well, it's certainly not the cheapest"). The style is professional but understandable, focusing on logical arguments.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-14
The Robbery of Rural People in Protected Areas

15th Riigikogu, fifth sitting, information briefing.

Uses a polite and formal tone, addressing "esteemed chairman" and "respected prime minister." The style is fact-based and constructive, even including light humor ("as Toots usually agreed upon with the teacher"). The argumentation is logical and sequential, focusing on a specific problem and its solution.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-13
Draft law amending the Basic Education Act, the Education Act of the Republic of Estonia, and other laws related thereto (establishing the obligation to attend school) – First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session

The speaking style is polite and constructive, utilizing the formal address "Esteemed Chairman" and "Dear Presenter." Questioning is cautious and analytical, focusing on clarifying the practical consequences.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-12
Inquiry regarding potential amendments to the Arms Act (No. 755)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.

Uses a polite and formal tone, addressing the recipients as "Esteemed Chairman" and "Dear Minister." Poses questions in a constructive manner, seeking clarification regarding the current situation. Avoids emotional expressions, focusing instead on fact-based questions.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-12
Inquiry regarding coping policies (no 736)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.

The manner of speaking is polite yet direct, utilizing formal address ("esteemed chairman," "good minister") and acknowledging the minister's previous concession. The rhetoric is fact-based and aimed at obtaining concrete answers, without emotional attacks.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-07
Draft law amending the Unemployment Insurance Act and, in consequence thereof, amending other laws (519 SE) – Second Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

They employ a direct, fact-based approach, starting with criticism regarding the passivity of the Centre Party faction. They politely correct themselves if they err on an official title. They pose specific questions and demand practical solutions, steering clear of emotional rhetoric.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-07
Draft law amending the Planning Act and other laws (accelerating the adoption of renewable energy) (541 SE) - second reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

It employs an official, fact-based, and explanatory style, focusing on the clarification of technical details and procedural matters. The tone is calm and constructive; even when addressing critical issues, it strives to provide objective explanations. It favors logical arguments over emotional ones, relying on concrete data and statutory requirements.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-07
Draft law amending the Electricity Market Act (555 SE) - third reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

Employs a balanced and analytical approach, honestly acknowledging both positive and negative aspects. The rhetoric is explanatory and educational, striving to explain complex technical issues in an accessible manner. A self-critical tone is utilized ("we sprinkle ashes on our heads"), yet it remains constructive and future-oriented. It concludes by taking a clear stance, demonstrating resolve.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-06
The Minister of Finance's 2025 presentation on the implementation of the state's long-term strategy "Estonia 2035" (including an overview of the development directions of the public service in 2024)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The tone used is polite and formal, addressing the Minister with an expression of respect. The questioning style is direct and fact-based, relying on specific data and previous public statements.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-06
Inquiry regarding the future of the ferry connection (no. 739)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

They employ a diplomatic and constructive approach when posing questions. They introduce the perspective of local communities (such as the objections raised by Muhu residents regarding the bridge's name), demonstrating a keen attention to detail. The text concludes with a practical argument outlining the bridge's benefits compared to the current system.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-06
Inquiry regarding the reorganization of Kehtna Vocational Education Centre and Vana-Vigala Technical and Service School (no 733)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The tone is polite and constructive, utilizing formal address ("Esteemed Chairman," "Dear Minister"). The style is inquisitive and proposal-based, not accusatory, with specific solutions being presented and positive prior experiences being referenced.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-06
Inquiry Regarding the Disruption of Railway Construction in Rohuküla (No. 731)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The speaker adopts an argumentative and persuasive tone, presenting fact-based claims regarding the project's readiness. They employ rhetorical questions ("Do you think I'm right about this?") and reference specific examples of previous politicians' actions to strengthen their arguments.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-05
Draft law amending the Competition Act and, in connection therewith, amending other laws (609 SE) - first reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The tone is combative and accusatory, particularly when criticizing the government, concluding the speech with the assertion that "the masks have fallen." The speaker balances these emotional accusations with technical explanations detailing how administrative procedure functions. They employ rhetorical questions and direct appeals to the minister, aiming to establish a dialogue and elicit concrete answers.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-04-23
Second reading of the draft law amending the Electricity Market Act (555 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The text employs a pragmatic and analytical approach, carefully balancing criticism with constructive proposals. The tone remains measured and professional, though it occasionally utilizes figurative language—such as the phrase "Kört-Pärtli särk" (Kört-Pärtel's shirt) to illustrate the situation's complexity. It stresses the necessity of clear communication so that the average person can grasp the energy debate. Fact-based arguments are prioritized over emotional appeals.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-04-16
Draft law amending the Energy Sector Organisation Act (574 SE) – First Reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session

The speaker employs data-driven argumentation, relying on concrete figures and facts. The style is critical yet constructive—they admit that "blaming each other and pointing fingers won't be of much help." They use irony ("those enormous masses who are watching us via the internet") and direct questions to challenge opposing viewpoints. The speech concludes with a clear position against the proposed bill.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-04-15
The Ministry of Justice and Digital Transformation's 2025 presentation on the implementation of the state's long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035."

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.

Uses an inquiring and analytical approach, presenting a sequence of questions directed at the Minister. The style is formal and fact-based, focusing on specific procedural issues. The tone is critical, yet courteous, utilizing the protocol language specific to parliamentary settings.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-03-26
Draft law amending the Church and Religious Communities Act (570 SE) – second reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

Employs a formal, argumentative style that combines emotional and logical appeals. The tone is urgently cautionary, especially when discussing security threats and the terrorist regime. Arguments are structured chronologically, and the speaker repeatedly uses reminders of previous decisions to strengthen their position.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-03-19
Second reading of the draft law amending the Maritime Safety Act and other laws (549 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The text employs a formal, structured, and fact-based register. The style is distinctly reportorial and neutral, concentrating on the chronological presentation of procedural steps and decisions, free of emotional or rhetorical techniques.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-03-19
Security

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing.

Employs a formally polite and structured approach, beginning with a traditional expression of acknowledgement. Questions are presented in logical sequence, relying on specific facts and the work of the commissions. The style is analytical and detailed, avoiding emotional judgments. It concludes with direct questions addressed to the government, demanding concrete answers.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-03-17
Inquiry regarding the third year of record-low birth rates in Estonia (no. 703)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The tone used is moderate and constructive, beginning with agreement and acknowledgment. Questions are posed for clarification, rather than for leveling accusations. The aspect of public interest is highlighted, noting that "no one wants to hear state secrets." The style is diplomatic, yet simultaneously direct in expressing needs.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-03-12
Competition Act

The 15th Riigikogu, fifth sitting, information briefing.

The speaker employs a formal yet critical tone, beginning politely with "Thank you, esteemed Chairman!" and "Respected Prime Minister!" They pose questions rhetorically to highlight contradictions and issues. The argumentation is logical and fact-based, relying on specific dates, figures, and legal statutes. Finally, they adopt a skeptical tone, hinting at hidden interests.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-03-11
The Prime Minister's address for 2025 on the implementation of the long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035" (including an overview of the situation of research and development activities and the government's policy in this area).

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

It uses a polite and constructive tone, beginning with a traditional expression of gratitude. It balances criticism with positive remarks ("overall, we are fundamentally in agreement"), employing both emotional arguments ("there is literally a war being waged against wind turbines") and fact-based ones.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-01-22
Draft law amending the Electricity Market Act (556 SE) – first reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session.

It uses an explanatory and persuasive tone, combining technical facts with emotional appeals. The speaking style is optimistic and future-oriented, emphasizing positive opportunities. Practical examples and personal experiences are used to support arguments, while maintaining an official and professional register.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-01-22
Draft law amending the Maritime Safety Act and other laws (549 SE) – first reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session.

It employs an official, protocol-driven style, utilizing traditional expressions of courtesy and formal addresses. The discourse is fact-based and structured, focusing on procedural details and the neutral reporting of the commission's work.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-12-18
Draft law (541 SE) for the first reading amending the Act of Implementing the Construction Code and Planning Act, the Environmental Charges Act, and the Planning Act (Accelerating the Adoption of Renewable Energy)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

Official and fact-based style, focusing on procedural information. It uses a structured approach, listing the commission's decisions and voting results in a neutral tone, without emotional or persuasive elements.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-12-11
Draft law amending the Accounting Act and, as a consequence, amending other laws (516 SE) - second reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

Employs a formal, detailed, and explanatory style, focusing on facts and procedural aspects. The tone is calm and constructive, aiming to find compromises among various stakeholders. It repeatedly stresses the importance of the "golden mean" and reasonableness, while strictly avoiding emotional or confrontational expressions.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-12-03
Draft Law Amending the Maritime Safety Act (526 SE) – Third Reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

It utilizes a factual and evidence-based approach, relying on research and statistics. The tone is optimistic and supportive, emphasizing the potential and achievements of the Estonian maritime sector. It references specific measures and comparisons with neighboring countries, using clear, professional language free of emotional appeals.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-21
Second reading of the draft law amending the Maritime Safety Act (526 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

It utilizes a formal, neutral, and fact-based register, focusing on the precise description of procedural steps. The tone of speech is calm and information-centric, devoid of emotional or persuasive elements, and is rather reportorial in nature.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-13
Second reading of the draft law on the 2025 state budget (513 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.

It employs a constructive and fact-based approach, emphasizing cooperation and consensus. The tone is optimistic and forward-looking, utilizing phrases such as "it is a pleasure to note" and "will certainly achieve the objective." It balances emotional and logical arguments, drawing upon both data and values.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-11
Draft law on the partial repeal of the Value Added Tax Act Amendment Act (489 SE) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

The speaker employs direct and confrontational rhetoric. Although beginning with a compliment regarding the opponent's rhetorical skills, they quickly transition to presenting accusations and historical facts. The style is argumentative and fact-based, repeatedly utilizing questions to undermine the opponent's position.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-07
First reading of the draft resolution of the Riigikogu “Establishment of a Riigikogu investigative committee to investigate circumstances related to the Rail Baltic project” (460 OE)

15th Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session

It employs a moderately optimistic and persuasive tone, frankly acknowledging the project's issues (schedule slippage, cost overrun) while simultaneously highlighting positive developments. The rhetoric is fact-based and structured, relying on specific figures and decisions. The delivery is diplomatic and constructive, avoiding emotional accusations or dramatic expressions.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-04
Draft law amending the Maritime Safety Act (526 SE) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

It employs an official and fact-based style, relying primarily on logical arguments and concrete data. The tone is collaborative and informative, addressing all inquiries with patience and thoroughness, even those that stray from the main subject. It openly acknowledges difficult decisions and necessary compromises, while strictly avoiding populist promises.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-10-23
Minister of the Interior's political statement on internal security

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session

It employs a formal, argumentative style that combines emotional appeals (direct quotes from citizens about the patriarch) with rational legal arguments. The tone is decisive and critical, especially regarding the conduct of colleagues. It concludes with a strong appeal to voters to evaluate the work of their representatives on important issues.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-10-22
Draft law amending the Accounting Act and, as a consequence, amending other laws (516 SE) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

It uses a formal, structured, and fact-based style, focusing on clarifying procedural matters. The tone is neutral and highly informative, avoiding emotional judgments. The presentation is logical and sequential, moving through the main points of the committee's discussion. It employs direct and clear language without complex rhetorical devices.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-09-25
The Regional Affairs and Agricultural Minister's 2024 presentation on the implementation of the state’s long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035"

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session

Uses a polite and formal tone, commencing with a traditional expression of gratitude. Questions are presented in a structured and logical manner, utilizing a factual approach without emotional expressions. The style is direct and practical.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-09-10
Second Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Accounting Act (428 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting

A formal and neutral presentation style, focusing on facts and procedural details. The discourse is structured, utilizing precise dates and procedural terminology, and avoids emotional judgments.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-06-12
Second Reading of the Riigikogu Resolution "Supporting the Introduction of Nuclear Energy in Estonia" (431 OE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.

The speaker employs a polite and formal tone, beginning with traditional addresses such as, "Thank you, esteemed Chairman! Good presenter!" His argumentation is logical and fact-based, relying on specific documents and the work of commissions. The style is more questioning than assertive, utilizing rhetorical questions to challenge the opponent's positions.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-06-06
First reading of the Draft Act amending the Accounting Act (428 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

A formal and neutral style, focusing on the delivery of facts without emotional evaluations. The discourse is structured and specific, utilizing precise dates and procedures, and concluding with a polite expression of gratitude.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-06-03
The written motion for a vote of no confidence in the Minister of Economic Affairs and Information Technology, Tiit Riisalo, submitted by 22 members of the Riigikogu.

Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary sitting.

It employs a polite and formal tone, addressing the recipients as "Esteemed Chairman" and "Respected Minister." The style is collaborative and constructive, highlighting potential areas of common ground and shared objectives.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-30
Discussion of the nationally important issue: "How can the state avoid living in debt?"

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting

He/She employs a balanced and analytical approach, integrating personal experience gained from working in government with fact-based arguments. The rhetoric is more explanatory than accusatory, though he/she critically acknowledges previous mistakes made in addressing inflation. A vivid example of the Lithuanian entrepreneurs' "4% club" is used to illustrate the links between national defense and the economy. The presentation concludes on a constructive note, stressing the necessity of making decisions.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-29
First reading of the Riigikogu Draft Resolution "Supporting the Introduction of Nuclear Energy in Estonia" (431 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The speaker employs a formally courteous and analytical approach, commencing with an expression of gratitude and utilizing official language. Their style is inquisitive and fact-driven, focusing on specific legal aspects devoid of emotional expression.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-29
First reading of the Bill amending the Land Tax Act (437 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

It employs an approach based on a rhetorical question, beginning with an ironic remark regarding the opponents' arguments. The style is direct and critical, relying on facts and historical examples, yet maintains the courtesy appropriate for a parliamentary setting.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-28
Third reading of the Draft Act amending the Building Code and other Acts (acceleration of the deployment of renewable energy) (Bill 308 SE)

15th Riigikogu, third session, plenary session

It employs a formal and fact-based approach, relying on data and concrete examples. The style is explanatory and educational, aiming to provide listeners with comprehensive information. It concludes with a practical example of solar energy's impact on stock market prices, making the abstract subject tangible. The overall tone is optimistic and supportive.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-16
Debate on the matter of national importance initiated by the Economic Affairs Committee: "How to increase productivity in the Estonian economy?"

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session

The speaker employs a formal yet accessible style, blending fact-based arguments with personal experience. They acknowledge colleagues and experts, express gratitude, and convey moderate optimism about the future. The overall style leans toward collaboration rather than confrontation, emphasizing shared objectives and the necessity of teamwork.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-08
Second Reading of the Draft Act (399 SE) on the Adoption of the Euro and the Amendment of Other Related Acts

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session.

It employs an official, factual, and neutral tone. The address is structured and logical, beginning with a clarification of the objective and concluding with the commission's recommendations. Emphasis is placed on data and procedural aspects, and emotional appeals are absent.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-08
Second reading of the Draft Act amending the State Budget Act (391 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session.

Uses a moderate and constructive tone, starting with praise for the work of the Finance Committee. It balances logical arguments with concrete examples, such as last summer's conflict between the Presidential Chancellery and the government. It concludes with a clear statement of support, maintaining a professional and respectful style throughout the entire speech.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-06
Continuation of the first reading of the Draft Statement of the Riigikogu "On declaring the Moscow Patriarchate an institution supporting the military aggression of the Russian Federation" (Bill 420 AE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.

He/She employs a balanced and diplomatic tone, repeatedly stressing the necessity of not offending the feelings of believers. The speaker combines emotional and logical arguments, highlighting both security threats and the necessity of protecting genuinely devout individuals. The delivery is formal yet accessible, with concrete examples used to substantiate their position.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-02
First Reading of the Riigikogu Draft Statement (420 AE) "On Declaring the Moscow Patriarchate an Institution Supporting the Military Aggression of the Russian Federation"

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The approach is factual and argumentative, grounded in specific documents and legislation. The tone is firm and persuasive, yet not aggressive—it constantly emphasizes that the statement is not aimed at religious believers. Explanatory rhetoric is used repeatedly, answering questions in detail and dispelling misunderstandings. Emotional references to security threats are balanced with rational legal arguments.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-04-09
First reading of the Draft Act on the Act on the Introduction of the Euro and the Act on Amendments to Other Acts Related Thereto (399 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The speaker employs a formal, protocol-driven style, characteristic of a committee rapporteur. The address is structured, fact-based, and emotionally neutral, focusing on the clear delivery of procedural steps.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-04-09
Report by the Minister of Economic Affairs and Information Technology on the implementation of the state's long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035"

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

Adopts a polite and constructive approach, starting with expressions of gratitude and using respectful forms of address. The style is factual and problem-oriented, yet remains optimistic and supportive regarding the minister's work to date. Questions are presented with a solution-focused mindset.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-03-19
The 2024 Report by the Minister of Health on the implementation of the state's long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035"

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

It employs figurative language (e.g., "reaching for the trowel" versus "reaching for the wallet"), which makes complex economic issues easier to grasp. The tone is polite and constructive, posing questions with the aim of improving the system rather than assigning blame.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-03-12
First Reading of the Draft Act amending the State Budget Act (391 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd plenary sitting

The speaker employs a formal-analytical style, combining evidence-based arguments with historical references. They acknowledge the complexity of the issue ("quite a difficult task") and use diplomatic language even when addressing critical subjects. The rhetoric is more explanatory than accusatory, focusing on systemic problems rather than personal accusations.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-03-07
Debate on the matter of national importance, "The Future of Estonian Energy 2035," initiated by the Estonian Reform Party parliamentary group.

Fifteenth Riigikogu, third sitting, plenary session

Uses a polite and formal tone ("Thank you, esteemed Chairman! Respected Minister!"), but is direct when posing questions. Focuses on facts and specific figures, seeking clear answers to complex technical questions.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-03-05
2024 Report by the Minister of Education and Research on the Implementation of the State's Long-Term Development Strategy "Eesti 2035" (Education Reforms)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session

It adopts a moderate and analytical approach, combining fact-based arguments with personal experience. The tone is constructive, yet critical of false claims (for instance, regarding the savings supposedly achieved by optimizing the school network). It emphasizes the necessity of caution when implementing reforms and uses practical examples to support its positions.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-02-15
Debate on the matter of national importance initiated by the Isamaa faction, titled "Estonia in Economic Recession. What is to be done?"

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

Uses an accusatory and confrontational tone, starting conversations with polite addresses but quickly moving to critical issues. Relies on facts and historical comparisons, employing rhetorical questions to pressure the opponent. The style is direct and demanding, focusing on specific actions and the lack thereof.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-02-14
First Reading of the Motor Vehicle Tax Bill (364 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

Adopts a measured and analytical tone, addressing the Minister politely. Poses questions seeking confirmation and employs logical argumentation when justifying the tax policy. Expresses a personal worldview ("this suits my worldview") straightforwardly.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-18
Debate on the National Issue of Crucial Importance: "Strong Rural Schools and a Strong School Network"

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

It uses a polite and appreciative tone, starting by thanking the Culture Committee and the Chairman. The style is analytical and fact-based, combining emotional impact (the future of children) with rational arguments. It concludes with a specific question, seeking practical solutions.
View Profile View Agenda
Back to Profiling