By Agendas: Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart

Total Agendas: 287

Fully Profiled: 287

2025-10-16
Debate on the nationally important issue "Why is food expensive?", initiated by the Estonian Centre Party faction.

XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting

The political focus is on the high price of food and tax policy, strongly supporting a reduction in VAT on foodstuffs. The need to respond quickly to the popular initiative is being emphasized, and the government is criticized for its inability to deal with consumer concerns. The position is forceful and aimed at criticizing the government's action (or inaction).
2025-10-09
First Reading of the Bill on Amendments to the Motor Vehicle Tax Act (625 SE)

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The political focus centers on the motor vehicle tax and the unequal treatment of disabled people. The speaker strongly opposes the government’s decision to replace the universal tax exemption with minimal allowances, labeling the move as cynical and an attempt by the state to profit at the expense of the most vulnerable. This stance is deeply value-based, stressing the importance of social protection and equal treatment.
2025-10-08
First reading of the Draft Decision of the Riigikogu (658 OE) "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic to Develop a Plan for Increasing Competition in the Mobile Communications Market and Accelerating Number Portability"

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The political stance centers on criticizing the government’s inaction in addressing a long-standing issue concerning competition within the mobile communications market. Support is being given to a draft bill that aims to mandate the government to develop a corresponding plan. This position is strongly focused on evaluating the government’s performance (or lack thereof) and is primarily results-driven.
2025-10-08
Third reading of the Draft Act supplementing the Police and Border Guard Act (670 SE)

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The political position is strongly focused on protecting the fundamental rights and freedoms of the people and opposing state surveillance. The speaker firmly opposes the legalization of license plate recognition cameras (670 SE), viewing it as part of a wider government effort to control society and establish massive databases. This position is value-driven, highlighting the absence of democratic debate and the lack of government trustworthiness. The Centre Party will vote against the draft bill, as it represents merely one step toward creating a surveillance society.
2025-10-08
2025 Report by the Minister of Social Affairs on the Implementation of the National Long-Term Development Strategy "Estonia 2035"

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The political position centers on strong opposition to the government's healthcare policy, which is viewed as a crisis stemming from a lack of proper prioritization and systemic failure. The primary emphasis is placed on the squandering of state funds within the Health Insurance Fund (Tervisekassa) and the resulting impact on the population's access to medical care. The speaker advocates for abolishing the Health Insurance Fund in its current structure and merging it with the Ministry of Social Affairs, stressing that the issues are systemic, not merely contingent upon the resignation of the director.
2025-10-08
Road Safety

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Information Hour

The political focus is centered on road safety and the regulation of light personal mobility devices, as the situation has become dangerous. The speaker strongly advocates for stricter regulations (age verification, limits on the number of rental vehicles, mandatory helmet use), prioritizing the protection of public health, especially that of children, over the freedom of enterprise. This is a strongly policy- and value-driven position.
2025-10-07
First Reading of the 2026 State Budget Bill (737 SE)

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The political position is critical and results-based, focusing on the shortcomings of the government's economic policy (the decline in consumer purchasing power) and the lack of budget transparency. The speaker demands accountability and calls for solutions to improve consumer confidence. Historical issues concerning the use of funds within the administrative area of the Ministry of the Interior are also being raised.
2025-10-06
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Motor Vehicle Tax Act (Bill 677 SE)

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The political position is one of strong and unwavering opposition to the motor vehicle tax, which is described as "tax chaos" and a "legislative hodgepodge." The speaker focuses on criticizing the government's instability and incompetence, particularly concerning the cuts to benefits for people with disabilities and families with children. The goal is the complete repeal of the car tax at both the national and Tallinn municipal levels, promising to implement this upon the Centre Party taking power. The position is strongly value-driven, emphasizing the necessity of ensuring constitutionality and social justice.
2025-10-06
First reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Motor Vehicle Tax Act (694 SE)

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The political position involves strong opposition to the motor vehicle tax, particularly focusing on its aspects of social injustice. The tax is framed as unconstitutional because it negatively affects disabled people, whom the state is specifically obligated to support. Furthermore, the government's promises regarding discussions about revoking the tax are being called into question, which highlights a framework focused on policy effectiveness.
2025-09-24
Second reading of the draft law amending the Police and Border Guard Act (670 SE)

Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.

The Centre Party faction is oppositional and critical of the draft law; it emphasizes the protection of fundamental rights and freedoms and fears the expansion of surveillance, calling for a thorough debate and the rectification of deficiencies. It states directly that the second reading should be suspended and does not rule out demanding greater scrutiny or amendments in the future if transparency and analysis are lacking in this sector. The position is based on core principles and values, and the faction remains critical of the government’s push to expand a surveillance system that raises security concerns.
2025-09-24
First reading of the draft resolution of the Riigikogu "Proposal to the Republic of Estonia's Government to abandon the implementation of the Rail Baltic project in Estonia and to withdraw from all international agreements related to the project" (650 OE)

Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.

The speaker is critical of continuing the Rail Baltic project, stressing the need for sensible financing and mandatory risk analyses. This stance is strongly linked to protecting taxpayer interests, with the expectation that these analyses must be completed before any further steps are taken.
2025-09-23
Open mic

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session

The main priorities concern the work of the special anti-corruption commission and strengthening consumer protection. We firmly oppose political decisions that favor a single company and stress the need for a level playing field in the market. We must focus on transparency in corruption and lobbying, and reducing the impact of undue influence; our stance is based on policy and values, not oriented toward personal compromise.
2025-09-22
Inquiry regarding problems with pension payments (no. 769)

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session

A salient issue is the high cost of maintaining the state's information systems and the problem of structural disarray. The speaker is critical of the current administration, stressing the need for comprehensive analysis and cost control, which points toward economic and administrative reform. The objective of improving the e-government infrastructure and cost sustainability has been raised, but no specific political program is mentioned.
2025-09-17
Draft law amending the Basic and Upper Secondary Education Act and the Vocational Education Institutions Act (620 SE) – First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting.

The first reading of Draft Bill 620 SE is supportive: the speaker emphasizes ensuring school meals and children's health, and criticizes the state's current activities for not having adequately helped families. He/She stresses the need for greater state involvement and tripartite (state-local government-parents) cooperation, and is either opposed to or noncommittal regarding the idea of lowering VAT (recommending state aid instead). The stance is policy- and value-based, focusing on social security and children's welfare, and highlighting the impact of increasing burdens and prices on families.
2025-09-17
Draft law amending the Mandatory Traffic Insurance Act (Insurance of Light Electric Vehicle Users) – First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting.

The speaker is strongly in favor of the bill and stresses consumer protection and public health safeguards. The primary demand is a unified mandatory traffic insurance requirement for all rental service providers to prevent unfair competition and unequal treatment. They commend the adherence to directives but criticize investments and decisions that politically favor one company (Bolt). Naturally, they emphasize that supporting entrepreneurship must occur on a level playing field, not to the benefit of a single party. There is no significant political repositioning—the approach is policy-driven and highlighted as a strong priority.
2025-09-17
Re-examination of the Act Amending the Act Preventing Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing and the Act on International Sanctions (640 UA), which was not announced by the President of the Republic

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting.

The speaker stands in strong opposition to the reconsideration and amendment of draft bill 640 UA. They emphasize that the amendments cannot be brought into compliance with the Constitution, and the bill should either be shelved or withdrawn by the government. Furthermore, they deem adherence to the protection of fundamental rights a paramount concern for the Riigikogu. This is a strongly value-based stance, voiced specifically for the defense of fundamental rights, which expresses clear criticism of the coalition's plans.
2025-09-17
Government decisions

Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, press briefing.

The core focus is an approach against corruption and the misuse of insider information, coupled with strengthening the oversight role of the Riigikogu (Estonian Parliament). He/She emphasizes the necessity of obtaining the complete list of insiders and achieving deeper transparency regarding the Eesti Energia Enefit Green case. The stance is sharply critical of both the government and the companies involved, and the individual is prepared to advance oversight and accountability. He/She has repeatedly delved into this topic in April and during parliamentary information sessions, raising questions concerning both legal entitlements and procedural matters. The focus remains on policy-driven principles of transparency and the necessity of ensuring compliance with rights and legal acts during the oversight process.
2025-09-17
Situation concerning the responsibilities of the Minister of Social Affairs

Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, press briefing.

The speaker is critical of the expenditures made by the Ministry of Social Affairs and the Health Insurance Fund, highlighting the need to review and justify costs related to half-a-million-euro events, salaries, board fees, and performance bonuses. He/She emphasizes the transparency required in using the state budget and states that funds must be allocated according to laws and established priorities; calling for greater oversight and public discussion. The current stance can be characterized as focusing on performance metrics and cost control, considering potential structural changes, and favoring collaboration with the council's special commission.
2025-09-16
The Chancellor of Justice's report on the conformity of legislative acts with the Constitution and the performance of other duties assigned to the Chancellor by law.

Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.

Emphasizes the necessity of transparency and accountability in the work of the Special Committee against Corruption, and demands the disclosure of the list of insiders and internal information. It takes a critical stance regarding the committee's potential limitations of competence and the explanations provided concerning the use of business secrets, which could restrict the availability of information. The objective is to ensure compliance with the Constitution and the fulfillment of duties stemming from the Chancellor of Justice Act, stressing legal oversight and accountability.
2025-09-15
Inquiry Regarding Increasing the Decision-Making Authority of Municipalities Concerning the Establishment of Land Tax Rates (No. 777)

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting

The speaker is strongly opposed to the central government's increase of the land tax and the expansion of local government obligations; emphasizes the need to strengthen the decision-making power and autonomy of local authorities, and views state policy as a force exerting pressure on local levels. The speaker characterizes the current government's behavior as "hypocrisy" and calls for resistance, including appealing to the Supreme Court if necessary. Their position is strongly policy- and value-based, focusing on the defense of local governments and the representation of the people's interests at the local level.
2025-09-11
The Financial Supervision Authority's 2024 Report

15th Riigikogu, 6th plenary sitting

The main focus is on strengthening anti-corruption control and increasing transparency: emphasis is placed on the importance of investigation and the necessity of sharing information with the public, as well as the plan to discuss the topic with the special anti-corruption commission. There is no clear political stance regarding the buyback of Enefit Green; in the context of this case, a responsible and transparent procedure is viewed as the priority.
2025-09-11
Draft law amending the Act of Obligations (621 SE) - first reading

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session

Supports the draft bill amending the Law of Obligations Act and stresses the necessity of conducting thorough impact assessments. It acknowledges that the Government of the Republic often fails to carry out such analyses and focuses on ensuring that reports reflect potential impacts on both consumers and the housing and real estate market. This formulation indicates a proactive yet procedurally focused approach, which is politically pragmatic and demands significant effort toward the draft bill.
2025-09-11
Draft law amending § 2 of the Public Holidays and Commemoration Days Act (637 SE) – First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session

I support the draft bill in the context of the potential benefits of an extra day off, particularly for spending time with family and for recovery. I expect the Riigikogu to advance the bill to the second and third readings and consider its approval. I take a critical view of the government's position, as I see a need for impact assessments and a more thorough discussion regarding the effects on the labor market and school workload.
2025-09-10
First reading of the draft resolution of the Riigikogu "Submitting a proposal to the Republic of Estonia's Government to develop tax incentives for student employment" (638 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session

The speakers are primarily focusing on youth unemployment and policies aimed at addressing the country's employment deficit. The presenters are critical of the government's current approach and stress the necessity of focusing on job opportunities for Estonian youth and developing the domestic workforce, which includes opposing the increased involvement of foreign labor. During the initial reading of the draft bill, no overtly strong or impassioned voices of support or opposition were expressed; the main goal is discussion and ultimately finding answers to the questions raised.
2025-09-10
A written request for a vote of no confidence in Social Minister Karmen Joller, submitted by 21 members of the Riigikogu.

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session

The individual stresses the need for transparent use of taxpayer funds and detailed expense reporting regarding the Health Insurance Fund. They are highly critical of the Health Insurance Fund management's spending, raising questions and demanding detailed answers. Their position is focused on financial accountability, prioritizing transparency and cost efficiency.
2025-09-10
Government decisions

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, press briefing

A critical and oppositional stance regarding the government’s current policy. It highlights the chaotic handling of state ownership and privatization, emphasizing taxpayer losses and calling for greater attention to the risk of corruption. It advocates for competition and transparency; no clear, concrete alternative program has been presented, but it forces the issue into the public sphere, demanding answers and oversight.
2025-09-10
Automaks

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, press briefing

The opposition's stance on the national tax policy criticizes the uncertainty of the tax policy and the failure to deliver on promises. This position is strongly opposed to the government, criticizing the car tax and broader tax solutions as examples of inadequate governance. He stresses that promises have shifted, and taxes have changed spontaneously depending on the political climate. He points to the promise to end the “tax festival,” arguing that it has yielded no real benefit. The framing is primarily political and focused on outcomes, rather than being technical, and underscores the government's lack of credibility and accountability.
2025-09-10
Information session

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, press briefing

Insufficient data.
2025-09-08
Inquiry regarding the destruction of Spruce plantations (no. 782)

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session

The most crucial issues are transparency and clarifying accountability concerning RMK's secret contracts and long-term agreements; he/she stresses the necessity of getting answers. He/She is clearly in favor of increasing special oversight and public reporting, desiring open and verifiable governance. The position presented is rather policy- and management-based, aimed at transparency and accountability in governance.
2025-09-08
779 Regarding the rapid growth of unemployment and the decline in employment

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session

The core focus of the discussion is the rapid rise in youth unemployment and Estonia's position among the highest levels in Europe; the speaker expresses clear concern and the necessity of clarifying the precise causes and underlying data. They emphasize that the primary reasons must be specified and reference post-COVID developments as context, but do not offer a concrete policy solution. The internal approach centers on analysis and fact-based debate, rather than directly outlining specific promises.
2025-09-04
Chair implementation

15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu

The main topics include the transparency of Riigikogu proceedings and the prevention of interference; the interpellations that have been submitted, and the objection to linking bills. As an opposition representative, strong criticism has been directed at the government's legislation and tax changes, emphasizing the necessity for thorough assessments and legal scrutiny. As a parliamentary group (faction), they have highlighted their readiness to promote transparency, accountability, and the protection of legality, often focusing on raising procedural issues as the primary priority. The emphasis has often been on improving political decisions and encouraging participation in legislative work with the coalition through compromise, though the overall stance remains one of strong criticism toward the government's activities.
2025-06-19
Draft law amending the Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Prevention Act and the International Sanctions Act (640 SE) – third reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

In comparison, the speeches delivered express strong opposition to Bill 640 SE. The speaker stresses that rushing the third reading is inappropriate and calls for the bill's removal from the agenda and the convocation of an extraordinary committee session; this action signifies a protest against the legislation. He/She highlights the infringement of fundamental rights and a potential constitutional conflict, referencing the role of the Supreme Court and the Constitutional Committee. He/She further emphasizes that the priority must be to protect freedoms and prevent the emergence of a surveillance society.
2025-06-19
Draft law amending the Accounting Act (600 SE) – third reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The primary stance is the strengthening of cooperation and democracy. He/She stresses that the coalition is ready to support the opposition's draft legislation, noting that this is a crucial step for the development of democracy. He/She also highlights the importance of the bill aimed at reducing bureaucracy and hopes to continue working with the Center Party's legislative proposals in the fall.
2025-06-19
Draft Law on Annulment of the Motor Vehicle Tax Act (647 SE) - First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The most crucial issue is the annulment of the motor vehicle tax; the speaker is strongly opposed to the tax and insists it must be repealed or amended on the grounds of constitutionality. He emphasizes that the tax was ruled unconstitutional, and the Ministry of Finance's subsequent inaction is unwarranted. The core tenet of their position is the defense of constitutionality and the termination of the tax's validity. The speaker does not clearly present an alternative framework; rather, the focus is on stressing constitutionality and urgency, alongside criticism of the coalition's activities.
2025-06-18
Draft law amending the Police and Border Guard Act (670 SE) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The speech reveals strong opposition to the bill, which is widely regarded as a rushed, flawed draft that potentially infringes upon fundamental rights. The presentation emphasizes that the bill violates fundamental rights and must be rejected during the first reading, citing the criticism and analysis provided by the Chancellor of Justice. The speaker focuses on safeguarding liberties and data protection, prioritizing the assurance of transparency and control over the unrestricted use of cameras. The primary objective is outright rejection, not a constructive compromise, underscoring the speaker's strong role as a defender of fundamental rights and democracy.
2025-06-18
First reading of the draft resolution of the Riigikogu, "Submitting a Proposal to the Government of the Republic" (630 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

Supports the state's capacity to enhance public safety in the fight against fraudulent schemes; specifically emphasizes the need to adequately address issues related to awareness campaigns and identity verification. The stance is heavily focused on prevention and governmental measures, rather than punitive or conflict-escalating rhetoric; no identifiable significant partisan opposition or uncompromising criticism has been described.
2025-06-17
Draft Law on the Sharing of Credit Information (652 SE) - First Reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session

Key interests include preventing over-indebtedness and improving financial resilience. The position is moderate, focusing on the necessity of tackling the root causes of problems, rather than just the consequences. He stresses the need for parallel, state-directed measures aimed at reducing payment difficulties and debt servitude. While he sees potential solutions in the secondary aspects (or nuances) of the draft legislation, he does not express strong, confirmed support or outright opposition.
2025-06-17
Draft law amending the Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Prevention Act and the International Sanctions Act (640 SE) - second reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session

Reportedly opposing the second reading of Bill 640 SE, the statement highlights the lack of a central database creation, privacy safeguards, and independent oversight, framing this as a threat to citizens' rights. The Kavatsi faction (Center Party) has submitted a motion to halt the reading, which reflects strong opposition and a fundamental, value-based political resistance to such decisions.
2025-06-12
Draft Law Amending the Employment Contracts Act and Other Acts (602 SE) – First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

Strong opposition was voiced to Bill 602 SE. It is claimed that the bill primarily serves the interests of employers and places a burden on employees, meaning employee protection is inadequate. The ideological underpinning is attributed to the Reform Party, and the lack of cooperation and consultation with trade unions is highlighted.
2025-06-11
Draft law amending the Church and Religious Communities Act (570 UA) – second reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The speaker is strongly opposed to draft law 570 UA in its second reading; they emphasize that the bill violates three constitutional principles: freedom of religion, freedom of association, and proportionality. They argue that existing instruments within criminal law are sufficient to address security threats and see no necessity in creating a new legal offense. They highlight that the Center Party's amendment would preclude the execution of decisions or instructions originating abroad if those actions threaten national security or the constitutional order. They emphasize the need to strengthen the protection of constitutional legislation and to maintain special protection for the rights of religious associations compared to political parties.
2025-06-11
Second reading of the draft law on the state's supplementary budget for 2025 (651 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The Center Party’s platform centers on maintaining and increasing social expenditures, specifically guaranteeing support for families with children, free kindergarten access, and other social services, both within Tallinn and nationwide. They level strong criticism against the government and the Social Democratic League, stressing that in earlier periods, family support and free services were either eliminated or severely cut. The party positions itself as ready to restore and expand these programs. Their messaging is policy- and value-driven, focusing on the well-being of children and families and reducing regional disparities.
2025-06-11
Draft law amending the simplified taxation act for entrepreneurs and the income tax act, and repealing the security tax act – second reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

A representative of the Centre Party is shaping a strong opposition stance regarding the government's tax package, stressing that the tax hikes will be permanent and will primarily burden middle and low-income families. He demands that the draft bill be amended or withdrawn and that the government be held accountable, emphasizing the need to listen to the voice of the people and protect democratic principles.
2025-06-11
Continuation of the second reading of the draft law amending the Competition Act and, in connection therewith, amending other laws (609 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The core focus is on safeguarding constitutional rights and preserving procedural guarantees; there is criticism of the draft bill that would permit the Competition Authority to employ simplified administrative procedures and impose substantial fines, arguing that this could violate the fundamental principles of the legal system. It highlights that the constitution and judicial rights, such as the presumption of innocence and the obligation regarding the submission of documents, must be protected; it emphasizes the principle of *ultima ratio* and expresses concern over the potential emergence of a punitive state. The style reflects robust political criticism, undertaken with serious commitment rather than mere compliance, centered on the protection of rights and the legitimacy of legal procedures.
2025-06-11
Ida-Virumaa's road infrastructure and safety

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing.

He emphasizes the necessity of increasing state budget allocations for the road network, criticizing the coalition agreement for lacking a sufficient long-term plan. The stance is strongly investment-focused and policy-driven, stressing the need for immediate and substantial investments, alongside a long-term infrastructure strategy. He warns about the economic and safety implications of delays and advocates for a larger budget next year compared to the current year.
2025-06-10
Draft law amending the Competition Act and, in consequence, amending other laws (609 SE) - second reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.

It defends the guarantee of constitutionality and the clarity of rights, raising questions about the draft law with a critical yet moderate stance. The position is primarily supervisory and rights-based, rather than strictly rooted in support or opposition. It does not clearly express strong favor for or resistance to the entire draft, but instead stresses the necessity of constitutional consistency and adherence to the view of the Chancellor of Justice.
2025-06-09
An inquiry regarding the sustainability and accessibility of the healthcare system (no. 759)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The core of the main topic is ensuring the accessibility of primary healthcare in sparsely populated regions and addressing the persistent issue of unfilled patient lists. The speaker stresses the necessity of receiving a plan and an overview detailing how this accessibility will be achieved, suggesting a strong expectation for concrete action. Specific measures or opposing viewpoints were not brought forward, and the position seems focused on seeking solutions to the problem and ensuring reporting and accountability.
2025-06-09
Request for information regarding severance pay paid to an advisor (no. 753)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The main topics are public sector wage management (compensation for officials) and the salaries of healthcare system employees. The approach is inquisitive and focused on oversight, emphasizing the need to clarify the minister's plans and monitor the direction of budgetary expenditures; there is an explicit absence of endorsements or objections. The framing is more informative and procedural than strongly policy or ideology driven.
2025-06-09
Inquiry Regarding Population Decline (No. 758)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The population crisis and declining birth rates are the main issues; the position is strongly pro-natalist and advocates for state intervention. He/She emphasizes that free kindergartens should be accessible throughout all of Estonia, not just in Tallinn, and that state aid to local governments is necessary. He/She also stresses cooperation and a consensus-based approach at both the national and local government levels.
2025-06-09
Inquiry regarding a network of number plate recognition cameras and the associated database (no. 756)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The most crucial issues are the protection of fundamental human rights, the privacy of personal data, and the legal basis for mass surveillance. The stance is strongly critical of the government's approach and stresses that the process must not be rushed or lack significant transparency; it calls for the system to be halted until legal clarity is established. It contrasts the situation with constitutional values and remains skeptical about the draft legislation's competence and the extent of the surveillance, aiming to promote clear, limited, and controlled solutions.
2025-06-05
Draft law amending the Road Traffic Act (616 SE) - first reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

Support for the adoption of the draft amendment to the Traffic Act to ensure safety during a major event; emphasis is placed on bringing children's health and safety to the forefront and the potential negative consequences if restrictions are not implemented. No clear extended coalition or opposition position was presented; the text focuses on strengthening safety arguments and the necessity of the draft bill.
2025-06-05
Draft law amending the Road Traffic Act (regulation of e-scooters and mopeds) - first reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The core position is the need for strong and rapid regulation in the urban environment concerning micromobility devices and small mopeds, to ensure people's health and life. He/She emphasizes increasing the rights of local authorities to limit the number of rentable vehicles and striking a balance between entrepreneurial freedom and health and safety costs. He/She is prepared for a robust and consensual process and stresses that while a balance must be found in cases of violations, a healthy and safe urban environment remains the priority. He/She views legislative amendments as a tool that would not completely restrict entrepreneurship but would ensure development within a safe and reasonable urban space.
2025-06-04
Draft law amending the State Audit Act, the Political Parties Act, and other laws (control body for political party funding) – first reading.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The points of interest are the regulation of political party financing and the issue of prohibited donations. The speaker is critical of the current mechanisms, highlighting the loopholes and resulting problems that allow the system to be abused. They were prepared to recommend certain clawbacks to the Riigikogu as a potential solution, and emphasize the need for stronger oversight. The tone is focused on reform and control, stressing that policy-based disagreement plays the primary role, rather than personal attacks.
2025-06-04
First reading of the draft resolution of the Riigikogu "Submitting a proposal to the Government of the Republic to initiate a bill amending the Traffic Act, which grants local governments the right to restrict or prohibit the use of rental electric scooters and mopeds" (618 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The representative of the Centre Party firmly supports the first reading of the draft bill and emphasizes the necessity of granting local municipalities the authority to restrict or prohibit the use of light personal mobility devices and small mopeds. He views this as a crucial and rapid solution that would reduce road chaos and enhance the safety of road users. The delayed action is critically assessed, and the need for cooperation and coalition consensus is stressed.
2025-06-04
Trust crisis

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing

The core issue addressed in the speech is government trust and tax policy. The speaker is critical of the government's conduct, emphasizing that taxes have increased in recent years contrary to earlier promises, which erodes people's sense of belonging and their trust in state authority. He calls for the need to restore unity and public confidence, and then poses the question of what steps must be taken to achieve this.
2025-06-03
The Minister of Public Administration's 2025 presentation on the implementation of the state's long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035"

Fifteenth Riigikogu, fifth session, plenary session

The main topics are the termination of targeted funding for Tallinn Airport and the demand for dividends, which will increase fees and jeopardize the continuation of flight routes. The speaker is critical of the government's financing and dividend policy and calls for its review, emphasizing economic sustainability and the protection of competition. The framing is policy-based and focuses on the impact of state policy on the aviation sector and state-owned enterprises.
2025-06-02
Inquiry Regarding the Pihlakodu Case and the Prosecutor's Office Activities (no 748)

15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session

The main observations relate to clarifying the interpretation of the law on corporate liability and strengthening victim protection. The speaker is proactively critical of the Prosecutor's Office, emphasizing the need to establish precedent and test boundaries, which will lead to better victim engagement and preventative measures. The position is policy- and performance-driven, focusing on the necessity of amending legislation and reinforcing victims' rights.
2025-05-21
Rahvusvaheline Valuutafondi bürood on Eestis asunud tegema tööd, et jälgida olukorda ja nõu anda valitsusele. Nad on leidnud, et Eesti majandus on tugev, aga on oluline püsida ettevaatlik ja vältida riske. Eriline tähelepanu on suletud inflatsioonile, mis on endiselt kõrge, ja sellele, kuidas see mõjutab inimeste ostujõudu. Samuti on oluline investeerida haridusse ja teadusse, et tagada pikaajaline kasvu potentsiaal. Fondi eksperdid rõhutavad, et valitsusel peaks olema valmis reageerima uutele väljakutsetele ja olema paindlik oma poliitikas. --- The International Monetary Fund's offices have begun working in Estonia to monitor the situation and provide advice to the government. They have found that the Estonian economy is strong, but it is important to remain cautious and avoid risks. Particular attention has been paid to inflation, which remains high, and how it affects people's purchasing power. It is also important to invest in education and science to ensure long-term growth potential. The Fund’s experts emphasize that the government should be prepared to react to new challenges and be flexible in its policies.

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing.

The question of the constitutionality of the car tax is central, and the representative takes a strong stance in opposition to this tax. He/She emphasizes that the Chancellor of Justice and the Supreme Court may declare the car tax unconstitutional, and demands the repeal or amendment of the car tax; the position is strongly rooted in the principles of the rule of law and fundamental values, and is aimed at a comprehensive review of the tax itself.
2025-05-20
Draft law amending the Enterprise Income Tax Simplification Act, the Security Tax Act, and the Income Tax Act (645 SE) – First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The speaker aligns their position with strong opposition to the government's tax policy, focusing on Bill 645 SE and the permanent establishment of the 24% VAT and income tax. They accuse the Reform Party and the Minister of Finance, emphasizing the state's moral and unified responsibility, and seeking to call the minister to order. The position is strongly policy-driven and critical, without highlighting a clear alternative economic policy.
2025-05-19
Inquiry Regarding the Future of Estonian Agriculture (No. 730)

15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.

The primary focus is on cutting red tape and boosting the competitiveness of small farmers. He/She stresses the need to renegotiate the environmental requirements stemming from the European Union's Green Deal, as these disproportionately burden small farmers. He/She is open to finding solutions and engaging in dialogue that would safeguard the competitiveness of producers.
2025-05-15
Draft law (610 SE) for amending the Nature Conservation Act and, in consequence, amending other laws (Nature assessment) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session

Does not show clear support for or opposition to the Natura amendments; the main emphasis is on the clarity and transparency of the bill's numerical foundations. He/She poses a critical question and demands that the minister provide actual figures and explanations. The style is critical, but not agitated; the description of the position leans more toward oversight and the demand for data.
2025-05-14
Pixies

15th Riigikogu, fifth sitting, information briefing.

The political stance is in opposition to the government’s austerity policy and the funding of Rail Baltic. It emphasizes that the abolition of the income tax hump must not lead to additional payments, and temporary taxes should not become a permanent burden that drains people's pockets. The focus is on controlling fiscal priorities and increasing the transparency of infrastructure funding, including criticism regarding the financing choices for major projects and the necessity for improved cooperation and risk assessment.
2025-05-13
First reading of the draft resolution of the Riigikogu "Organizing a referendum on the question of electricity production from oil shale" (581 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session

The speaker highlights corruption threats and criticism directed at green policy, stressing that current decision-makers may belong to different political parties. Concern is expressed regarding the green transition and issues of climate corruption, with an emphasis on the necessity of transparency and roll-call voting. While no clear confirmation is given regarding support for or adoption of the draft legislation, a critical stance toward the context of current decisions is evident.
2025-05-12
Inquiry regarding coping policies (no 736)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.

The main areas of focus are people's livelihoods and social protection, as well as tax policy. The speaker is strongly opposed to the government's tax hikes and argues that the promised tax cuts never materialized, adding that the government lacks the mandate to make permanent changes to the tax system. He frames livelihoods as an issue of national security importance, emphasizing that a lack of protection for the populace threatens the stability of the state; he calls for the government to be held accountable or resign over its controversial decisions.
2025-05-12
Hearing regarding the care reform (no 719)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.

The main topics are strengthening the supervision of care homes and clarifying the liability of legal entities. The position is geared towards reform, stressing the necessity of either a new law or amendments to existing legislation to ensure better protection in cases of violence; the current system fails to provide adequate accountability. The issues raised are heavily focused on policy and legislation, centering on victim protection and systemic improvement.
2025-05-08
Implementation of the Minister of Justice and Digital Transformation's 2025 submission "Fundamental Principles of Criminal Policy until 2030"

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The main topics are victim protection and the liability of companies (legal entities) in criminal cases, as well as establishing a preventive precedent in case law. He/She strongly advocates for the broad implementation of the provision and the creation of precedents to increase accountability for both companies and their oversight. Furthermore, he/she is critical of the state's current response and the approach taken by the prosecutor's office, demanding the initiation of proceedings against the legal entity in order to send better signals to victims.
2025-05-08
Draft Law on Declaring the Security Tax Act Invalid (595 SE) - First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The speaker takes a strong opposition stance against the government's tax policy, emphasizing that the imposition of the security tax and other tax hikes is unfair and destabilizing. He stresses the necessity of repealing the taxes and argues that the closer the permanent 'nit' is to comparable taxes, the greater the resulting damage (jobs, family benefits, economy). He notes that the Centre Party supported the draft bill and promises a fight following the next elections if the bill does not pass; the actual goal is the resignation of the government and a transparent tax policy.
2025-05-07
Draft law amending the Alcohol, Tobacco, Fuel and Electricity Excise Tax Act and the Value Added Tax Act (594 SE) – First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

I support the bill on its first reading, but I must emphasize that raising the fuel excise tax could contract the logistics sector and increase the cost of goods. I believe the revenue generated from these excise duties should be channeled into road construction. I am concerned about the risk of bankruptcies among logistics firms and general price hikes, and I stress the importance of considering the interests of entrepreneurs. I see a coalition opportunity here, and the potential supportive position of the Centre Party suggests a compromise in economic policy.
2025-05-07
Draft law amending the Unemployment Insurance Act and, in consequence thereof, amending other laws (519 SE) – Second Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

A representative of the Centre Party, whose core political position is opposition to the Social Democrats (SDs) and decisions formulated by the government. He emphasizes issues of corruption and transparency and deems the behavior of the Social Democrats, now in opposition, hypocritical. He stands against draft bill 519 SE (making a motion to discontinue and not supporting the bill) and links this to broader political decisions, for which he blames the opposing side's previous actions (abolition of child benefits, tax changes). He highlights the necessity of accountability and public debate and is prepared to involve other parties and interest groups for the sake of greater transparency.
2025-05-07
Coping

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing

The opposition stance, focusing on the theme of corruption and the economic well-being of citizens. It emphasizes the work of the special anti-corruption committee and the necessity of a public hearing in the Porto Franco case, as well as the mutual accountability of the Social Democrats and their coalition partners. It relies on assessing the estimated effectiveness of the government and the coalition, and questions whether the SDE achieved more for people's livelihood than other parties; it puts forward a strong emphasis on scrutiny and accountability.
2025-05-07
People's livelihood

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing

There is not enough data.
2025-05-06
The Minister of Finance's 2025 presentation on the implementation of the state's long-term strategy "Estonia 2035" (including an overview of the development directions of the public service in 2024)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The core position focuses on safeguarding the independence of officials from political influence and protecting the quality of the state within a democratic framework. It is critical of the notion that salary increases could be a tool for ensuring loyalty to a specific political party, and stresses that officials must not be affiliated with any single party. It emphasizes independence from both general politics and the policies of political parties, and adopts a cautious stance on matters concerning the protection of proportional democracy. This position is primarily institutional and oriented toward the defense of democracy, rather than the promotion of a specific political platform.
2025-05-06
Inquiry Regarding the Disruption of Railway Construction in Rohuküla (No. 731)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The address centers on criticism of the decisions made by the Reform Party in 2022 and emphasizes the importance of preserving funding for regional projects. The author views these decisions as diminishing regional development potential and portrays them as being in conflict with government cooperation and regional interests. The stance is strongly oppositional towards the Reform Party, focusing on the question of accountability and clarifying funding priorities.
2025-05-05
Inquiry Regarding Rural Areas (no. 713)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The main topics are anti-corruption oversight and the transparency of state and local government management, as well as the unreserved advancement of the funding and implementation of the mobility reform. The stance is critical of the actions taken by the government and the capital city, emphasizing accountability and the necessity of achieving tangible results; the focus is primarily on the surface of action and responsibility. The framing is policy-based and results-oriented, rather than simply ideological.
2025-05-05
Inquiry Regarding the Coping of Pensioners (No. 726)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The main political platform focuses on improving the livelihoods of pensioners and criticizing the government’s tax policy. The speaker is strongly in opposition, arguing that tax hikes and spending cuts reduce pensioners’ incomes and deepen inequality. They emphasize that the priority must be ensuring fair and timely support for pensioners, coupled with humane policy; they propose investments in IT development as a solution to the problem of pension payouts. This platform is strongly rooted in values and service provision, and the criticism is primarily aimed at the government.
2025-05-05
Inquiry regarding the social welfare reform (no 720)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The speech centers on social welfare reform and the necessity of retaining the allowance for pensioners living alone. He/She is strongly opposed to the draft bill, which he/she intends to overturn and ensure the benefit is reinstated. This position is grounded in the current economic context, rising prices, and the increased risk of poverty, emphasizing that these changes could place a significant burden on local municipalities.
2025-05-05
Inquiry regarding amendments to the Employment Contracts Act, or regarding occasional work contracts (no. 735)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The position presented is strongly opposed to the amendments to the Employment Contracts Act concerning on-demand contracts. It emphasizes that while the changes offer flexibility primarily for employers, the risks remain with the employee, and wage guarantees are limited. This stance is heavily value-driven, focusing on employee protection rather than neutral consensus.
2025-05-05
Draft law amending the Competition Act and, in connection therewith, amending other laws (609 SE) - first reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The speaker presents strong opposition to the current approach taken by the SDPs and the government regarding the amendment of the Competition Law, emphasizing that the directive should be transposed via misdemeanor proceedings, thereby avoiding separate administrative proceedings. He views the creation of administrative proceedings and the subsequent imposition of large fines through them as dangerous (the expansion of Pandora's Box), and stresses the protection of fundamental rights and the separation of powers between the judiciary and the regulatory agencies. He frames this as seeking accountability from the SDPs and, instead of utopian promises, demands strict oversight of the legislative process. The overall tone emphasizes robust legal protection and sound procedural logic, which he considers both a priority and critical.
2025-04-23
Draft law amending the Local Government Electoral Act and the Act on Churches and Parishes (544 SE) - Second Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The main topic is the need to amend the law on churches and congregations, particularly regarding the voting rights of the clergy in local government bodies. He points out that the provision is problematic and ought to be changed; previously, they could not support the Center Party's amendment proposal on the same matter, but he emphasizes the need for further changes. The position is moderate or positive regarding the direction of change, emphasizing the importance of procedural economy and consensus.
2025-04-23
PPA Ida Prefecture

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing

The main focus is on protecting individual privacy and constitutional rights. He is strongly critical of the creation of nationwide license plate recognition camera networks, emphasizing that a legal basis is lacking and the data collected could jeopardize fundamental rights. He views excessive surveillance as dangerous and calls for a solution achieved through a clear legislative framework and comprehensive oversight.
2025-04-23
Estonian strawberry

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing

The primary focus is on inflation and food prices. He/She is critical of the government’s plan to raise the VAT, stressing that this will not help the situation for families, and instead advocates for a tax reduction (9% for local producers) as a potential solution. The style being highlighted is policy-based, focusing on specific tax and consumer concerns.
2025-04-21
First reading of the draft resolution "Establishment of a Riigikogu investigative committee to examine the security of the Riigikogu e-election process" (576 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The decision by the city of Tallinn to restrict the number of polling stations is viewed as a failure to guarantee the principles of free elections. The position taken is strongly critical; it emphasizes the freedom of elections and the right to choose the voting method (including paper ballots). The decision has been framed as a political move, which the speaker does not endorse.
2025-04-17
Draft Law Amending the Value Added Tax Act (593 SE) – First Reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session

The Center Party is strongly backing the draft bill: "The Center Party will definitely support this." He points out that the coalition may not support a reduction in VAT for all foodstuffs, but there is an ongoing discussion regarding lowering the VAT specifically on local products. The speaker stresses the dual benefit of state support for both local businesses and consumers, and remains open to further ideas and proposals that would help improve people's ability to cope financially.
2025-04-17
First reading of the draft resolution of the Riigikogu, "Submitting a proposal to the Republic of Estonia's Government to reduce the VAT on foodstuffs to 9 percent" (579 OE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session

The core stance involves criticizing the Social Democrats' tax policy and defending the national economy and citizens' ability to cope. He stresses that the measures being pushed—such as raising the car tax and VAT, and implementing taxation from the first euro—are detrimental to the populace and are being slammed as "anti-people" decisions. There is no significant desire apparent to broadly cut taxes or spending in related areas; the position remains more critical than offering a concrete alternative plan. The framing is policy- and value-driven, highlighting public welfare and the state's economic consciousness.
2025-04-15
Draft law amending the Public Transport Act (578 SE) - First Reading

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.

Regarding the political position, the text does not reveal a clear, direct stance for or against the draft bill. Instead, the text focuses on the impact of lobbying and observations regarding the fairness of the regulation, all of which are viewed through a critical lens. The emphasis is placed on the necessity of regulatory transparency and consistent treatment, rather than on the capacity to specifically approve or reject the measure.
2025-04-15
The Ministry of Justice and Digital Transformation's 2025 presentation on the implementation of the state's long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035."

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.

The main topics are increasing the accountability of the justice system and protecting victims' rights. The speaker is highly critical of the work of the prosecutor's office and the justice system, and stresses the necessity of initiating criminal proceedings against a legal entity. This stance is rather performance-driven and aimed at achieving visible results and increasing accountability.
2025-04-14
Inquiry regarding offshore wind farms (no. 722)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

An open decision-making process subject to parliamentary oversight is crucial; the stance is critical of top-down decisions. He/She emphasizes the necessity of Riigikogu deliberation and the revision of the energy sector development plan, but does not present a concrete political program at this time. The position is centered on values and procedures.
2025-04-14
Inquiry Regarding the Continuation of Service as Prime Minister (No. 728)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

He is in opposition and critical of the government's tax policy. He stresses that the sustained increase in VAT and income tax undermines people's ability to cope financially, and accuses the government of treating citizens merely as rows in an Excel spreadsheet. He is pushing for a cabinet overhaul and clear answers concerning the proposed legislation, and ultimately expresses skepticism regarding the Prime Minister's ability to remain in office, emphasizing the urgent need for change.
2025-04-10
The Chancellor of Justice's proposal to align the Motor Vehicle Tax Act and the Road Traffic Act with the Basic Law.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The most important topics are the constitutionality of the car tax and ensuring exemptions for people with disabilities and large families. This position is clearly oppositional to the car tax, emphasizing the lack of necessary exemptions and arguing that this contravenes the constitution; the focus is on protecting the rule of law and constitutional guarantees. This stance is taken in the name of the principles of a value-based state and the rule of law, rather than being based on arguments of financial benefit or efficiency.
2025-04-09
The first reading of the draft resolution (569 OE) of the Riigikogu, "Proposal to the Government of the Republic to temporarily suspend the processing of all planning procedures related to wind farms, with a deferral until the establishment of an up-to-date methodology for infrasound measurements and the setting of limit values for sound pressure levels."

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session

A critical viewpoint concerning environmental protection restrictions. It stresses the necessity of increasing the use of natural resources for economic purposes and highlights the potential benefits of wind energy for businesses. It operates on the assumption that the government’s plan will create disproportionate advantages for specific companies and could result in greater deforestation. It does not offer a clear proposal or alternative to Bill 569 OE, but instead characterizes these intentions merely as a potential direction or trend.
2025-04-09
Continuation of the first reading of the draft law on declaring the Motor Vehicle Tax Act invalid (592 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session

The most crucial topics are the opposition to the car tax and the negative impact of tax changes on families, people with disabilities, and rural residents. The stance is strong and critical of the coalition, characterized by the desire to annul the car tax and utilize legal remedies against it. This position is focused more on the principles of values and legality, and the plans encompass steps that accelerate both parliamentary and judicial processes.
2025-04-09
Government decisions

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing

The core stance is highly critical of the proposed nationalization of Enefit Green, arguing that the coalition's current plan to privatize state-owned enterprises does not align with sound economic principles, in his estimation. He stresses that this renewed decision to take the company into state ownership contradicts previous decisions made by the Reform Party and underscores the resulting costs and risks for the taxpayer. Furthermore, he emphasizes the necessity of transparency and accountability and is bold enough to raise questions concerning insider information and conflicts of interest.
2025-04-08
Draft law amending the Securities Market Act and, in consequence thereof, amending other laws (588 SE) - first reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The core issue is the shortage of female specialists and their representation within the governing bodies of publicly listed companies. The stance taken is moderate, seeking to advance women's inclusion, yet it remains critical of the specific directive. The argument is that the directive is merely cosmetic and fails to address the underlying problem; it stresses the necessity for genuine, nationally directed action with a broader scope. The focus remains on finding policy and institutional improvements, rather than resorting to ideological radicalism.
2025-03-26
Draft law amending the Constitution of the Republic of Estonia (536 SE) – Third Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

Not enough data.
2025-03-26
Government decisions

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing

An opposition speaker who focuses on criticizing tax policy and highlighting the impact of costs to society. There is a strong stance against the government's tax policy (including VAT hikes) and the fundamental taxation mandated by the European Union directive. Simultaneously, they refer to previous coalition agreements and the Reform Party's earlier support for the directive, which subjects the current position to moderate or strong criticism and necessitates an explanation of why it was adopted under those previous circumstances. The framing is typically based on arguments concerning political and economic consequences and equitable distribution, rather than solely on macroeconomic assessment.
2025-03-19
Market economy in Estonia

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing.

He is sharply critical of the government's actions, which appear to favor the interests of specific companies and political parties. He stresses the need for fair competition and transparency regarding funding decisions made by the Just Transition Fund and issues related to the inclusion of delegations. He does not offer concrete alternative solutions, but underscores the necessity of market-based competition and ethical governance.
2025-03-19
Economic Revitalization Plan

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing.

In the context of economic revitalization, the speech focuses on anti-corruption oversight and increasing transparency. The speaker is critical of Tarmo Tamm and emphasizes the need for accountability and fair procedures regarding funds and business transfers; he does not clearly present specific alternative economic policy solutions. The interpretation is policy- and value-based, focusing on fairness, adherence to the law, and transparency in the use of economic subsidies.
2025-03-17
Inquiry Regarding the Impact of Car Tax on Families with Children (No. 705)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The Centre Party is strongly opposed to the car tax, placing constitutional legality at the core of its argument. The party’s position emphasizes that the car tax lacks specific exemptions for large families and people with disabilities, which makes its legitimacy problematic within the modern legal environment. They demand the repeal of the car tax or, at the very least, the establishment of special allowances and compensation for large families and people with disabilities. The statement stresses that the coalition’s conduct is flawed, and the fight will be continued both in parliament and in the courts. The ultimate goal is to restore justice and legality, and, if necessary, to maintain influence even after future elections.
2025-03-12
Draft law amending the Rules of Procedure Act of the Riigikogu (552 SE) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session

The representative stresses the strengthening of parliamentary oversight and ensuring that ministers appear before special committees. They are highly critical of the government's failure to appear and underscore the necessity of receiving answers and enhancing transparency. In this context, the position is policy- and procedure-driven, focusing on the effectiveness of legislative scrutiny.
2025-03-12
Competition Act

The 15th Riigikogu, fifth sitting, information briefing.

The most crucial position is the opposition to the Social Democrats’ plan to transform the Competition Authority into a punitive body and establish a separate administrative procedure. He/She stresses that misdemeanor proceedings must be utilized when transposing the directive, and has previously presented and defended relevant amendments concerning this viewpoint. This position supports the Supreme Court’s Olerex case law, as well as the views of the Chancellor of Justice and criminal law experts, all of whom affirm the necessity of preserving the constitutional framework rather than creating a new “punishment state.” This is primarily a policy-driven and legally justified stance, not a populist or emotional attack.
2025-03-12
RMK

The 15th Riigikogu, fifth sitting, information briefing.

The speaker is critical of RMK's long-term contracts and emphasizes the need to strengthen transparency and anti-corruption oversight. They demand a special audit and broader independent analysis, claiming that the current analysis is biased and could undermine fair competition. The stance is strongly reform-oriented, focusing on the accountability of the government and state institutions, as well as improving procedures.
2025-03-12
Governing the state

The 15th Riigikogu, fifth sitting, information briefing.

The speaker emphasizes criticism directed at the Social Democratic Party (SocDems) and expresses concern over the increasing power of the Government Office and the State Secretary. Their position is strongly opposed to the party’s policies and quite critical of their previous coalition decisions. They characterize the SocDems' behavior as hypocritical and underscore the necessity of control, transparency, and preserving the balance among institutions. The stance is primarily politically oppositional, and the main driving motivation is the supervision and control of the functioning of the government and its institutions.
2025-03-10
First reading of the draft resolution of the Riigikogu “Establishment of a Riigikogu investigative committee to examine the circumstances related to the termination of Nordica’s activities” (543 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The main position is that the Riigikogu must form a special investigative committee to clarify the circumstances related to the termination of Nordica's activities; the goal is to increase accountability and transparency for the protection of taxpayer interests. The proponent is critical of the actions taken by Michal, KredEx, and the Ministry of Climate, emphasizing that anti-corruption oversight and the public disclosure of evidence are essential. The viewpoint has been raised that existing objections and concealed decisions must be brought to light, and the committee should offer assistance and outline further steps for the Prosecutor's Office.
2025-02-27
A written request from 21 members of the Riigikogu expressing a vote of no confidence in Climate Minister Yoko Alender.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The opposition's stance is clearest in energy and climate policy: criticism directed at the speed of the government's green transition and subsidies for offshore wind farms, with emphasis placed on transparency, protecting consumer prices, and controlling the burden on taxpayers. A direct motion of no-confidence is being filed against Climate Minister Yoko Alender, and the factions demand the removal of Maar from office and thorough reviews of non-corruption-related risks. The position is strongly confrontational and fundamental: control over resource allocation based on democracy and public interest, and ensuring clarity regarding areas of responsibility. The factions (Centre Party and EKRE) see the need to make the feasibility of decisions public and to end decisions formulated through "backroom" processes.
2025-02-26
Aeronautics

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, press briefing

The main subjects of attention are the state's ownership policy, as well as the dividend payouts and investment conditions of state-owned enterprises. He is strongly critical of the direction of the current system, arguing that it will lead to consumer price increases and a reduction in travel opportunities. He emphasizes the necessity of maintaining affordable airfare and ensuring its accessibility to everyone, and poses direct questions about whether the ownership policy must change. His speech is geared toward policy formation and seeks solutions to problems, rather than being confined to a limited, value-based platform.
2025-02-25
Draft law amending the Constitution of the Republic of Estonia (536 SE) – second reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

Opposition to Constitutional Amendment Bill 536 SE; a strong opposition against the coalition and the party currently holding power in Tallinn, accusing them of seeking political advantage and endangering democracy and the rule of law. The speaker emphasizes that these amendments are a tool for political maneuvering and should not be undertaken lightly or right before elections. The framing of the argument is based on protecting the rule of law, fundamental values, and ensuring procedural transparency.
2025-02-19
Draft law amending the Church and Religious Communities Act (570 SE) – First Reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary sitting

The speaker is strongly opposed to the draft amendment concerning the Churches and Congregations Act. He emphasizes that existing mechanisms, such as the provisions utilized under Section 14, Subsection 2 of the Act, are adequate, and there is no need for supplementary measures. He argues that the draft bill poses a threat to the rule of law and is thus unacceptable; the approach is framed as the defense of the constitutional state and its values, rather than a rational political compromise.
2025-02-19
Government decisions

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th sitting, information briefing

The speaker stresses the importance of transparency and parliamentary involvement in energy policy. He is critical of hidden decisions and emphasizes that decisions should be made within the government and the Riigikogu, not behind the closed doors of party meetings. He sees the development of the energy economy through the technological direction of decisions and the inclusion of scientific research, and he underscores the need for democratic debate.
2025-02-18
Draft resolution "Proposal to the Republic of Estonia's Government Regarding the Imposition of a Temporary Solidarity Tax on the Banking Sector" (535 OE) – First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The first speech expresses strong opposition to the government’s economic policy, focusing specifically on the perceived preference in bank taxation and criticizing the overall economic strategy. The speaker stresses that the banks’ advance corporate income tax rate is 18%, while individuals will pay up to 24% income tax next year. Furthermore, the speaker views the government as reacting preferentially towards banks and showing favoritism toward specific sectors. The speaker also points to potential preferential treatment for the offshore wind sector and uses skeptical and critical language, which can be interpreted as establishing a general oppositional framework against the government’s current direction.
2025-02-17
Inquiry Regarding the Impact of Elron Ticket Price Increases on Regional Policy (No. 708)

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session

Stance: Critical of the coalition's transport policy; emphasizes that funding for transport is vitally important, and that old models (free public transport in rural areas) were appealing and their abolition must be critically addressed. He/She views the fulfillment of the coalition's promises as essential and stresses that the current government is not allocating additional money for transport. The framing is primarily based on political and fiscal policy direction, aiming to restore or strengthen transport investments.
2025-02-12
A written request for a vote of no confidence in Prime Minister Kristen Michal, submitted by 29 members of the Riigikogu.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

He emphasizes that the interests of the Estonian people and ordinary families should be the priority, not the interests of the rich or the excess profits of banks. He is strongly critical of the current government’s economic and tax policies, arguing that they push families into hardship and increase inequality. He stresses the importance of public opinion and the role of the Riigikogu (Parliament) as the voice of the people in delivering the final verdict during elections, while presenting his own opposition-based and value-driven approach.
2025-02-12
Government decisions

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing

The speaker adopts a strong oppositional stance against the government’s tax policy, stressing the negative effect that increases in car tax, VAT, and income tax will have on household incomes and the overall cost of living. He argues that national priorities should center on citizens' ability to cope financially, and questions whether the government’s priorities lie with the people or the state itself. He indicates that the "third priority" position is unacceptable and highlights the necessity of taking three concrete steps to stimulate the economy, though he fails to name any specific alternative reforms.
2025-02-11
A debate on foreign policy initiated as a matter of significant national importance by the Foreign Affairs Committee.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The main focus revolves around how the Riigikogu (Parliament) organizes its foreign policy discussions and questions regarding ministerial accountability. The speaker is highly critical of the Foreign Minister and their political party, citing sources of corruption and donations made to Ukraine, which, in their view, are influencing political decisions. Their stance is oppositional and value-driven: concentrating on enhancing transparency, ethics, and the overall quality of the debate; they do not, however, present any specific policy plans.
2025-02-10
First reading of the draft resolution of the Riigikogu, "Proposal to the Republic of Estonia's Government to carry out an analysis of the impact of young people’s social media use" (550 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session

A critical, yet objective viewpoint: It stands against those who advocate for broader forms of language prohibition; emphasizing that the issue requires studying the impact on children's mental health and attention capacity, and offering educational solutions rather than outright bans. It supports the draft bill's focus on research and the concept of training programs. The assessment is that the focus should initially be on analysis and raising awareness, rather than implementing strict restrictions.
2025-02-10
Inquiry Regarding the Closure of the Kopli Commando (no. 682)

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session

The speaker maintains a strongly critical position regarding Läänemets's leadership and emphasizes the need to improve budget transparency. He describes the management as a mess and stresses the necessity of accountability and public reporting, noting that two finance ministers have critically assessed Läänemets's planning. The position is clearly oppositional, focusing on strengthening control and anti-corruption oversight.
2025-02-10
Inquiry regarding the deepening revenue gap among local governments (no. 675)

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session

The current design of the care reform is viewed critically; the text stresses that the cost distribution is inequitable and the entire system should be re-evaluated. It uses the State Audit Office report as its main evidence and states that further analysis and modifications are required. It points out that the Reform Party's position does not support free public transport in the capital, but its main focus remains on the control and distribution of costs, which is considered the more significant problem.
2025-02-10
Inquiry Regarding Bank Tax (no. 673)

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session

The focus is on criticizing the opposition's economic policy: they support implementing a bank tax on excess profits and promise that, upon taking power, they will repeal the car tax and other temporary tax increases. They maintain a strong, principled critique of the government's tax policy, specifically deeming burdensome taxes unfair and detrimental to families. While their core values are justice and the redistribution of the tax burden, they also signal a political intent to pursue other measures should the ruling coalition change.
2025-01-28
Draft law amending the Hunting Act (553 SE) - First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The amendment to the Hunting Act represents a significant development. The stance is moderate and process-oriented: there is a desire to involve animal protection advocates and consider amendments that may be introduced during the second reading. The focus is on reducing tensions and viewing the broader regulation of the draft bill as a necessary adjustment, rather than a radical overhaul.
2025-01-22
Foolishness

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing

The main themes concern the independence of the State Secretary and constitutional compliance; the position is critical of any amendments that might diminish this autonomy. He/She emphasizes that the State Secretary must sign and ensure that the government's legal acts conform to the constitution, and must refuse to sign them should a conflict arise. He/She highlights the necessity of upholding constitutional requirements and calls for a clear debate in light of the current amendment. The style is critical, yet substantive and emphasizes constitutional principles.
2025-01-22
The situation in the country

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing

The statement is highly critical of the government's bailout of Nordica and the subsequent squandering of taxpayer funds. It stresses the absolute necessity of transparency and accountability, and poses questions demanding clear answers. The position is strongly centered on control and oversight, focusing on evaluating the current management rather than simply rushing into new, ill-conceived measures.
2025-01-16
Draft law amending the State Budget Act (520 SE) - First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The main position is improving budget transparency and control through amending the basic law and strengthening the linkage between expenditure and revenue lines and the explanatory memorandum. It was pointed out with a strong critical tone that the current budget, due to its simplification (decluttering) and delegation practices, contradicts constitutional requirements, necessitating a legislative amendment. It demonstrates an effort to cooperate between the coalition and the opposition, citing examples where reforms are failing and the Ministry of Finance's practices are deficient, while emphasizing a pragmatic, system-improving approach.
2025-01-15
Draft law amending the Occupational Health and Safety Act and the Health Insurance Act (504 SE) - First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

Emphasizes the reciprocal link between health and the economy, along with concern over the detrimental health effects of government decisions. The speaker is critical of the Reform Party's healthcare policy and raises the question of the bill's potential assistance and balancing effect; however, they do not express clear personal support for the bill.
2025-01-15
Draft resolution "Proposal to the Government of the Republic of Estonia to allocate funds for co-financing Tallinna Hospital" (498 OE) – First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The primary objective of the Tallinn Hospital co-financing bill is, first and foremost, to secure funding through cooperation between the state and the city; it strongly advocates for the modernization of healthcare infrastructure and the enhancement of regional capacity. The speaker criticizes the policy of the Reform Party, arguing that the removal of 2022 EU funds harmed the national healthcare system. They emphasize that the project is not merely for Tallinn, but is a matter of national healthcare and crisis preparedness. The focus is on flexibility and cooperation with the coalition; they stress that the goal is to unite the involved parties and proceed through the first reading as the initial step, rather than getting bogged down in lengthy planning.
2025-01-15
Corruption risks in government decisions

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing

Political Position: The position opposes the government’s plan to alter the role of the Secretary of State and introduce the fast-track bill, arguing that these actions could undermine the foundations of the rule of law and exacerbate public distrust in state institutions. It stresses that the rule of law must be safeguarded, and the consistency of legislation must align with the constitution and established practices, rather than being driven by the interests of a single individual. This stance is strongly critical, aiming to limit the potential for corruption risks through adherence to legitimate and transparent procedures.
2025-01-15
Tallinn–Vilnius newly opened railway service

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing

The main topics are increasing the transparency and accountability of state-owned enterprises management, and streamlining the work of the special anti-corruption committee. The speaker is strongly critical of the accuracy of the information presented by the government and stresses the need for accountability and honest reporting. In the current context, the focus is on increasing oversight and transparency; no alternative policy was presented.
2025-01-15
KredEx loan to Nordica in spring 2024.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing

The main objective is to emphasize accountability and transparency concerning the KredEx loan to Nordica and its management. The speaker accuses the Climate Minister and the management team of shifting responsibility and stresses that the contract and the conflict of interest require thorough scrutiny. The stance is strongly critical and aimed at preventing corruption and improving oversight.
2025-01-13
Inquiry regarding the closure of the Jõhvi Courthouse (no 666)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The closure of the Jõhvi courthouse is his main topic; his position is strongly opposed and critical of cost estimates that are based purely on figures without an impact analysis. He stresses the necessity of evaluating the impact on the entire judicial process and the presentation of court consolidation within a broader scheme, which suggests a contradiction regarding short-term savings opportunities. He also notes that the closure of small courts and the major direction of the Reform are classified as potentially vague, and asks for the Ministry of Justice's stance, demonstrating an approach that is critical but not merely resistant. (Opposed/critical, with strong policy direction; argues for the necessity of impact assessment.)
2025-01-13
Inquiry regarding the stability and price of electricity production (no. 670)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The core position is that the owner's expectations regarding Eesti Energia must be reassessed and must take into account the interests of Estonian residents. Current expectations emphasize dividend revenue, supply security of 1000 MW, environmental requirements, and new investments, but the state has not provided additional investments; the price level for residents must be addressed concurrently, and this must be a priority. A crucial objective is to ensure a reasonable electricity price for residents, which has been highlighted as a necessary component when incorporating the owner's expectations; the position seeks balance and is centered on the public interest.
2024-12-17
Draft law on aligning the State Budget Act with the Constitution of the Republic of Estonia (525 SE) – First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

An oppositional and critical stance regarding the coalition's budgetary administration; stressing that Bill 525 SE and other similar drafts are necessary to enhance budget transparency and monitor the fulfillment of the coalition’s promises. Very strong criticism concerning the lack of budgetary transparency and the ineffectiveness of the explanatory notes; demanding faster amendments that adhere to constitutional frameworks, and their subsequent adoption. A polished, politically cohesive approach, focused on achieving change not through ideological means, but through procedural methods and tangible results.
2024-12-12
Draft Law Amending the Act on the Government of the Republic (523 SE) – First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

Support for the draft legislation: Thanks and a positive attitude were expressed in the speech, and it was stated that this is a "good draft bill." No direct criticism or alternative solution was presented; the topic remains primarily within the scope of discussion regarding background issues related to ministerial solidarity and salary growth. The style is focused on policy and legislative procedure, rather than being generally critical.
2024-12-11
Third reading of the draft law on the 2025 state budget (513 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

The first address expresses a critical stance regarding the tax policy of the 2025 state budget, focusing specifically on tax fairness and the issue of special concessions granted to banks. It is argued that corporate taxation is set to reach 22%, while banks have been given preferential treatment (an 18% advance income tax rate), which generates a feeling of injustice. The style is critical and demonstrates a political interest in tax policy, though no alternative solutions are proposed.
2024-12-11
Third reading of the draft law on the security tax (512 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

Strong opposition to the security tax bill and the government’s tax policy. It emphasizes that taxation, especially for those with no income or very low incomes, increases poverty and harms the economy; it calls for focusing on cost cutting and solidarity, rather than imposing an additional tax burden. It refers to a previous agreement regarding the taxation of banks and highlights the perception that the government lacks social responsibility.
2024-12-11
Draft law amending the Act on the Government of the Republic and amending other acts related thereto (505 SE) – third reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

The speaker is strongly opposed to the draft bill; emphasizing that altering the educational requirement for the Secretary of State within the omnibus bill jeopardizes the rule of law and the apolitical nature of the civil service, thereby politicizing high-ranking official posts. They stress the breach of a 30-year tradition and the necessity of maintaining the stability, transparency, and independence of these positions. They reflect a value-based and principled pushback, criticizing the haste and potential abuses of influence within the political agenda.
2024-12-11
Thefts

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth session, press briefing.

Critical and concerned regarding the government’s tax policy and the socio-economic situation; emphasizes that tax increases could exacerbate poverty and theft and calls for additional analysis of the link between crime and economic policy. The position is strongly oppositional, focused on criticizing government policies and assessing their impact, rather than offering specific alternatives, thereby providing contemporary food for thought.
2024-12-11
Tax Festival

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth session, press briefing.

The main emphasis is on ensuring banks are taxed and contribute to security in the name of solidarity. He/She is in favor of taxing banks and stresses that the taxation of banks, dividends, and the terms for advance income tax should be fairer; while simultaneously maintaining a critical attitude towards taxing pensioners. He/She considers the government's actions insufficient in implementing bank taxation and is critical when the policies of the Center Party and the Social Democrats appear unclear or unfairly imposed at the expense of pensioners. (4)
2024-12-10
Draft law amending the Act on the Status of a Member of the Riigikogu (528 SE) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

The speaker focuses on highlighting the credibility issue facing the Riigikogu and attempts to demonstrate that the institution's reputation is poor. They don't take a clear stance for or against the draft bill, but instead question whether the proposed changes might improve public trust; the focus remains on improving trustworthiness, rather than on making specific political decisions. The position is primarily value- and performance-driven, stressing transparency and increasing public confidence through legislative means.
2024-12-04
Second reading of the draft law on the security tax (512 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting

The primary focus is on the efficacy of raising taxes and evaluating the future trajectory of the security tax bill. The speaker is skeptical regarding tax increases, pointing out that previous hikes failed to generate the anticipated revenue. Therefore, they propose considering the abandonment of exceptional tax hikes and focusing instead on economic stability. This constitutes economic policy-based and fact-driven criticism rather than an ideological platform.
2024-12-04
Second reading of the draft law amending the Alcohol, Tobacco, Fuel and Electricity Excise Tax Act and other laws (510 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting

The representative maintains a neutral and inquisitive stance; they do not express firm support for either raising or lowering the alcohol excise tax, but instead focus on clarifying the justifications and underlying logic. They refer to the decision made by the Finance Committee to leave the 2025 alcohol excise tax unchanged and stress the necessity of understanding why cross-border trade and tax collection are crucial elements in the forecasts. The representative demonstrates that policy-based reflection and potential risks were considered, rather than presenting a strong personal mandate favoring one option over the other.
2024-12-04
The situation regarding the state's finances

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, press briefing

The primary focus is the state budget and tax policy. The speaker opposes the increase in alcohol excise tax and stresses that decisions must be grounded in thorough analysis and careful consideration of economic consequences. He/She demonstrates fiscal prudence and an openness to considering the idea of taxing corporate profits, but insists on an impact assessment and comparison with historical data. Overall, this represents a critical, analysis-driven, and more fiscally stable approach, emphasizing the avoidance of making decisions based on uncertain figures.
2024-12-04
Security

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, press briefing

The main topics are internal security and trust in the Minister of the Interior. The speaker is strongly critical of the Minister of the Interior and SDE, claiming that the minister is worried about Center Party voters and that the party lies and changes its opinions. The stance is strongly opposition-oriented and does not present concrete policy proposals.
2024-12-04
The situation in the country

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, press briefing

The primary concern centers on the deficiencies in the ownership policy for state-owned enterprises (SOEs) and the incomplete articulation of the owner's expectations. Emphasis is placed on the necessity of managing the sector in a goal-oriented, transparent, and responsible manner. The individual is critical of the current coalition’s plan to increase political control over SOE supervisory boards, demanding a clear confirmation or rejection of the official strategy. The speaker advocated for the use of fact-based debate and a non-political governance framework, rather than additional political intervention.
2024-12-02
Inquiry regarding the impact of tax changes on the state budget (no. 648)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

A critical and control-oriented position on tax policy; it emphasizes that the impact of tax changes on the state budget must be clearly specified, and experts should be involved in the decision-making process. It demonstrates a fundamental demand for accountability and transparency, but does not express clear partisan support for or opposition to previous steps.
2024-11-20
Draft law amending the Act on the Government of the Republic and amending other acts related thereto (505 SE) - Second Reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

Opponent of the second reading of Draft Law 505 SE. Argues that the bill would fundamentally alter the entire Government of the Republic Act and would allow the position of State Secretary to be tailored for a select few individuals, which constitutes a dangerous precedent and a violation of the independence of state institutions. Describes the bill as an omnibus and a pseudo-draft law, aimed at appointing leaders who are dependent on political interests. Emphasizes the need to retain the educational requirement and stresses the necessity of preventing the politicization of top state offices; maintains a strong, principled opposition.
2024-11-20
Third reading of the draft law amending the Social Welfare Act (pensioner support) (508 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

An opposing position on Bill 508 SE in its third reading. It emphasizes the protection of funding for pensioners' economic security and social welfare, and deems the coalition's tax policy detrimental to the elderly. It argues that tax hikes and rising service costs deepen inequality and fail to help stabilize the state budget. It calls for a "No" vote, presenting a platform based on value-driven compassion, exemplified by the care shown to older people.
2024-11-20
The content of politics

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, press briefing.

The main topics are the rise in crime and the worsening socio-economic situation, which are linked to the government's economic policies. He is strongly opposed to the Reform Party's economic policy, arguing that their decisions are making it harder for residents to cope and are increasing inequality. This stance is rooted in both policy and values, stressing the need for an economic policy focused on improving people's standard of living and ensuring the country's resilience.
2024-11-18
Inquiry Regarding the Involvement of Interest Groups (no. 656)

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth Session, Plenary Session

The address centers on criticizing current engagement measures and proposed development plans, stressing the importance of early stakeholder inclusion and adherence to sound legislative principles. It does not articulate a definitive ideological stance but suggests that the quality of engagement and the coordination of timelines need improvement. Consequently, one can infer a moderate or critical political position focused on procedural enhancement rather than contentious ideology.
2024-11-14
Second reading of the draft law amending the Social Welfare Act (pensioner support) (508 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.

The speech's central political stance is an expression of strong opposition to the coalition's social welfare and pensioner benefits bill. The speaker stresses the lack of respect shown to the elderly and argues that the coalition is punishing pensioners who live alone, which is morally reprehensible. The style is strong and value-driven, focusing on ethical considerations and perhaps offering criticism that differs from previous periods.
2024-11-14
Draft law amending the Family Benefits Act and other laws (507 SE) – second reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.

Political Position: The presenter is critical of and in opposition to the draft bill. They emphasize that the objective of reducing state expenditures could compromise access for patients and people with disabilities, and increase out-of-pocket contributions in healthcare. They highlight the criticism voiced by stakeholders as significant and refer to potential negative consequences, without presenting clear alternative solutions.
2024-11-13
Second reading of the draft law on the 2025 state budget (513 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.

An opposition representative from the Centre Party, who is critical of the government's budget and tax policy. He highlights the deteriorating situation of families and the most vulnerable groups, arguing that the tightening of taxes and rising prices directly contradict their interests. He stresses that the state's priorities should be focused on ensuring people’s ability to cope financially and investing in the IT and artificial intelligence sectors, instead of using the budget to burden those with low incomes. He characterizes the budget as a political decision that exacerbates inequality and erodes public trust in the state.
2024-11-13
Draft law amending the State Budget Act (511 SE) - Second Reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.

The representative of the Centre Party is in opposition to the coalition, centering their focus on budget transparency and a cost-based framework. They are actively fighting against the ministers' ability to unilaterally change expenditure lines at any time, stressing the need for parliamentary control and open debate. Moreover, they are ready to advance their own bill and employ the disruption of the second reading as a means of limiting the coalition's influence. The position is characterized by an emphasis on strong criticism and legislative oversight, rather than being mere political rhetoric.
2024-11-07
First reading of the draft resolution of the Riigikogu “Establishment of a Riigikogu investigative committee to investigate circumstances related to the Rail Baltic project” (460 OE)

15th Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session

Regarding the topic of Rail Baltic, there is a strong need to form a separate investigative commission and ensure the transparency and purposefulness of how public funds are used. This stance is aimed at seeking consensus between the coalition and the opposition, and the criticism centers on deficiencies in budget transparency and potential corruption risks. The establishment of the investigative commission is presented as a policy- and sector-specific oversight tool, not merely a rhetorical step.
2024-11-07
First reading of the draft resolution of the Riigikogu, "Submitting a proposal to the Republic's Government to lower the value-added tax on foodstuffs to 5 percent" (492 OE)

15th Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session

The first speech lacks clear, direct support for or objection to the proposed legislation; it emphasizes comparing the ideas with those proposed by Latvia and highlighting the bill's potential superiority relative to those suggestions. The second speech stresses the bank tax as a method of financing and expresses the view that this is the correct path forward. At the same time, there is a visible readiness to discuss alternatives should the coalition fail to support the bill, which indicates a constructive and compromise-oriented position. Overall, the emphasis appears to be on the economic policy objective (covering costs and incomes) and a small-scale testing and results-based approach, rather than a strong, firmly defined stance regarding any specific piece of legislation.
2024-11-06
Overview of the Use and Preservation of State Property in 2023–2024. Five Years of Activity-Based State Budget: Results of the Reform and Necessary Further Decisions

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The focus is on the increasing need for Riigikogu (Parliamentary) control and budget transparency. It takes a critical stance regarding the role of the Ministry of Finance and considers the current activity-based budget reform to have failed, thus demanding further, substantive decisions and greater parliamentary participation. It supports the coalition's critical rhetoric but seeks changes to the State Budget Act to ensure the justification of expenditures and clear performance indicators. It ritually stresses that the national budget must be debated at the Riigikogu level, rather than being adopted as a decision pre-approved by ministers.
2024-11-06
RMK term contracts

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, information briefing

Secret RMK contracts and the Ministry's insufficient oversight of its involvement constitute a serious problem. The speaker is highly critical of the RMK management board and the Ministry of Climate, emphasizing the necessity of increasing transparency and accountability. They demand an independent state audit and an assessment of the potential damage caused to the state. This stance reflects an approach that values anti-corruption measures and good governance.
2024-11-05
Overview of the Government of the Republic’s Activities in the Implementation of European Union Policy

Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session

The speaker advocates for increasing the state's accountability in law-making and improving its quality. They cite the critical findings of the National Audit Office audit (deficiencies in impact analysis and lack of early stakeholder involvement) as key issues that need to be addressed. They call upon the Prime Minister to discuss familiarizing themselves with the audit and the plan for these necessary improvements, stressing the importance of outcome-based results and process development.
2024-11-04
Draft law amending the Sports Act (518 SE) - first reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

I support increasing the safety of motorsports competitions and clarifying the requirements through federation certifications; this is a primary priority for me because safety is crucial. However, there is a critical concern that the federation might use this certification system for self-gain or to exert competitive pressure on event organizers; I demand transparent and controlled implementation. This is not an ideological or radical attempt at a complete overhaul, but rather a proactive and practical approach to solving the issue.
2024-11-04
Inquiry Regarding the Spread of Narcotics (no 650)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

There is strong, expressed opposition to the legalization of cannabis; this opposition points to European data suggesting that legalization is linked to increased consumption of other drugs and a rise in organized crime. The speaker stresses the necessity of gathering more precise information and implementing strict restrictions to limit cannabis availability. This stance is policy- and sector-based, with a strong emphasis placed on prevention.
2024-10-23
A written request for a vote of no confidence in Finance Minister Jürgen Ligi, submitted by 29 members of the Riigikogu.

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session

The speaker represents the opposition and focuses on criticizing the policy of the Minister of Finance. He emphasizes the importance of people's livelihoods and the priorities for state functioning, expressing deep concern over how taxes, the car tax, and cuts in the social sector are impacting citizens' lives. While constrained by the limited scope, he does not present concrete alternative policies, but stresses the necessity of considering the interests of the population and providing clear answers to questions on topics vital to the public.
2024-10-23
Minister of the Interior's political statement on internal security

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session

The primary focus is the defense of religious freedom and the critique of restrictions; the representative opposes the plan to limit religious associations in Estonia. He emphasizes that faith is free from political agendas and criticizes the proposed legal amendment as a potential threat to religious freedom. He asks for practical criteria and the legal basis for how canonical ties are defined, and why new regulation is necessary when the existing penal code already addresses illegal activity. The position is critical and defensive.
2024-10-23
Democracy crisis

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, information briefing

The representative of the Centre Party faction firmly advocates for strengthening the role of the Riigikogu and increasing the transparency of the state budget. He emphasizes that a minister should not hold sole power when making final decisions, and the Ministry of Finance's current approach jeopardizes parliamentary oversight—a move that contradicts the critical and constitutional framework. This stance is clearly in opposition to the coalition's current budget decision. It is a strongly oppositional position, rooted in core values centered on policy and legislative creation, and aims to restore parliamentary control.
2024-10-22
Draft resolution "Proposal to the Republic of Estonia's Government regarding the introduction of a temporary solidarity tax on the banking sector" (487 OE) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

The representative of the Reform Party opposes the draft bill concerning the temporary solidarity tax on the banking sector and expresses strong resistance. They argue that the new tax will limit the purchasing power of ordinary citizens and curb future investments, emphasizing that the bill is fundamentally incompatible with economic growth. Furthermore, they criticize the minister for acting as an advocate for the banks and underscore the necessity of preventing the adoption of such taxes.
2024-10-21
Inquiry Regarding Tax Increases (No. 647)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The address focuses on the criticism leveled against the tax increases and the Finance Minister’s responses. Central to this is the opposition’s stance, which emphasizes the protection of families’ purchasing power and daily livelihoods, and demands answers and transparency concerning the tax policy. The framing is value-based, concentrating on safeguarding welfare and incomes; the tone is consistently critical, thus standing in strong contradiction to the government’s proposed plans.
2024-10-21
Inquiry Regarding the Care Reform (no 649)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The presenter of the inquiry is critical of the draft bill; they point out the plan to withdraw the single pensioner's benefit from those pensioners residing in care homes, and they ask whether the money will be directed toward financing the care reform. They emphasize the issue of local government funding and the possibility of pursuing litigation against the state, while also expressing concern over the proportional use of resources. Therefore, their main position regarding the bill is critical, and they seek confirmation that local governments will not be forced to implement court decisions.
2024-10-16
Draft law on the 2025 state budget (513 SE) - first reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

Strong opposition to the 2025 draft state budget (513 SE); emphasizes the protection of vulnerable groups' livelihoods and expresses concern over the negative impact of tax increases. It argues that increases in taxes and VAT will reduce purchasing power and may fuel inflation. The position is heavily focused on value-based and policy-driven criticism, without outlining specific alternative paths.
2024-10-16
Draft Security Tax Act (512 SE) – First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

Supports the general concept of the security levy, but stresses that the burden of solidarity must primarily fall upon those who are less secure and lower-earning. Opposes the idea of applying the solidarity tax to banks and the digital economy, which is not recommended (reason: increased burden on accrued profits). References the Lithuanian example of a temporary solidarity tax and uses it as a point of reference that the topic is politically viable. Thus, the stance is pragmatic and focused on directing solidarity—but with strictly limited beneficiaries.
2024-10-16
Draft law amending the State Budget Act (511 SE) - First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

Speaking as a representative of the Centre Party, the presentation is strongly opposed to Bill 511 SE. He/She stresses that all expenditure and revenue lines must be made visible, and the Riigikogu’s decision-making role must not be delegated to the executive branch. He/She is critical of the bill, viewing it primarily as offering cosmetic improvements that fail to solve the transparency issue. He/She offers an alternative, emphasizing the need to strengthen parliamentary oversight, rather than granting ministers the free right to amend the budget. He/She personally prioritizes achieving the goals of transparency, anti-corruption control, and the reduction of earmarked funds, in cooperation with the government.
2024-10-16
Minister of Finance's Statements

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, press briefing

The criticism of the Finance Minister’s tax policy constitutes the main political position; the speaker is strongly critical, emphasizing the negative impact of tax hikes on both the economy and family life. He points out the rising taxes—including VAT, income tax, fuel and electricity excise duties, doctor’s visit fees, and the capping of child benefits—and sees this as damaging Estonia’s competitiveness compared to neighboring countries. His tone and remarks reflect political criticism directed at the government’s economic policy, stressing the need for timely assessment and necessary changes.
2024-10-15
Draft law amending the Alcohol, Tobacco, Fuel and Electricity Excise Tax Act and other laws (510 SE) – first reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session

I express a critical stance regarding Draft Law 510 SE: it is stressed that this constitutes multiple taxation for car owners and associated businesses, compounded by the introduction of a car tax and rising prices for spare parts and services. There is a call to review the revenue forecast for the fuel excise duty, noting that income could even decrease if individuals abandon their vehicles or if logistics companies suffer. The style is highly policy-driven, focusing on the protection of consumers and businesses within an economic framework; the primary message is the critique of the initial form of the draft law.
2024-10-15
First reading of the draft law amending the Income Tax Act and the Defence Service Act, and the draft law amending the Income Tax Act (509 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session

The opposition's position regarding the government's tax policy. It stresses that raising VAT and income tax, and increasing electricity and fuel excise duties, coupled with a new car tax and the reduction of child benefits, will burden families and drive up inflation; the criticism is strong and focuses on the economic impact on families.
2024-10-14
Draft law amending the Act on the Government of the Republic and amending other laws thereof (505 SE) – First Reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting

The stated position is strongly opposed to Bill 505 SE at the first reading; the representative of the center faction emphasizes that changing the educational requirement is unjust and sets a dangerous precedent for tailoring laws based on a political candidate. The position relies on principles and constitutionality, demanding debate and rejection at the first reading. It links this stance to maintaining merit control and the independence of the Secretary of State, instead of amending the Government Act.
2024-10-14
Draft law amending the Family Benefits Act and other laws (507 SE) – first reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting

The speaker opposes the draft legislation, stressing that the fourfold increase in specialist visit fees, the doubling of the hospital bed-day fee, and the rising prescription drug prices included in the bill will exacerbate inequality and place a heavy burden on the most vulnerable. He notes that while the sums may appear minor, they significantly affect vulnerable individuals and could undermine the nation’s overall resilience. By framing the issue this way, he draws attention to a security concern, arguing that rising healthcare costs restrict people’s access to treatment and medication.
2024-10-09
Nordica

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, information briefing

The speaker expresses a critical stance regarding the state’s involvement in Nordica, emphasizing inadequate strategic objectives and weak control mechanisms. They directly question the necessity of having a national airline at all, drawing parallels with Estonian Air and pointing to the risk posed to taxpayer interests. The speaker notes that continuous losses and insufficient accountability demonstrate a need for transparency and a clear plan for the future; while not offering a specific alternative, they demand decisions and answers. Overall, the position is critical, with economic and strategic arguments taking precedence.
2024-10-07
Inquiry regarding road construction and four-lane roads (no 408)

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session

The main emphasis is on the targeted allocation of excise and car tax revenue directly into road infrastructure, alongside criticism regarding the transparency of current funding. A previously established agreement concerning the use of excise revenue for road construction is mentioned, and the author appears keen to revert to it, or at least ensure that the revenue is channeled straight into road infrastructure. Tõnis has stressed the importance of fairness and transparency, as well as the necessity for funding distributions to be clearly reflected in the budget discussion. The profile of activity indicates a focus on the objectives of influencing political debate and modifying current budgetary practices.
2024-10-07
Inquiry Regarding Via Baltica (No. 234)

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session

The primary issues concern adherence to the timelines for inquiries (or interpellations) and the prevention of corruption risks within the context of large-scale projects. The presentations indicate concern regarding delays and a clear desire to make the work of the government and the ministry more efficient; the stance is wisely pragmatic, focusing on results and procedures rather than being constrained by a strong ideological framework.
2024-10-07
An inquiry regarding internet services offered to people in Estonia (no. 646)

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session

The speaker focuses the discussion on data accuracy and transparency. He/She requests clarification regarding the minister's previous statement concerning Latvia, stressing that the 13% and 88% figures represent a significant discrepancy and require explanation. The approach is fact-based and avoids unnecessary ideology, prioritizing the presentation of reliable information.
2024-09-25
The Regional Affairs and Agricultural Minister's 2024 presentation on the implementation of the state’s long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035"

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session

A representative of the Center Party emphasizes the idea of lowering the VAT on agricultural products as the most crucial fiscal and economic policy instrument that the government could bring to the table in the near future. He notes that the Center Party has submitted this proposal multiple times, and previous bills have failed to gain support, which suggests limited backing for the government’s actions. The position is reform-centric, proactive, and cooperation-seeking, focusing on introducing measures for coalition discussion and clarifying the partners' stances.
2024-09-25
Constitutional analysis in the explanatory notes of bills

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, press briefing

The speech focuses on safeguarding constitutionality and the critical evaluation of European Union norms; it takes a strong stance against the copying of EU norms and emphasizes the need to allocate budgetary resources for constitutional compliance review. He/She notes that EU norms do not always have to align with the Estonian legal system, and we should be twice as critical. There is a firm desire to champion the protection of the constitution and a call for greater commitment from the ministry to constitutional analysis.
2024-09-25
The behaviour and credibility of government members

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, press briefing

The main topics are the cuts to funding for extracurricular education and criticism regarding the conduct of government members. The speaker adopts a strong oppositional stance toward the proposed cuts, emphasizing the importance of hobby education for fostering children's creativity and supporting families. They highlighted the inter-ministerial criticism as significant and hinted that the Social Democrats would support the decisions during the vote, which points to the internal dynamics of the coalition. The position is policy- and value-based, focusing on the welfare of children and the sustainability of the funding.
2024-09-24
Draft law amending the Arms Act and, in connection therewith, amending other laws (468 SE) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting

A positive and cooperation-oriented approach is evident regarding the draft bill. It is emphasized that previous amendments remained unclear, and if necessary, the legal framework must be improved by including citizens of OECD countries to ensure international cooperation. The sharp focus stemming from defense and security policy is on strengthening legality and cooperation capacity, not on tightening borders.
2024-09-19
First reading of the Draft Act amending the Basic Schools and Upper Secondary Schools Act and the Vocational Educational Institutions Act (404 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

As a representative of the Centre Party, he emphasizes in his speech the state increasing funding for school meals and the importance of promoting youth health. He is critical of the coalition's tax policy and the lack of social assistance, arguing that the focus is on collecting money from families rather than ensuring actual livelihoods. He highlights previous Centre Party proposals (support for school sports, lowering VAT on local fruits and vegetables, increasing funding for hobby education) as proposed solutions that received coalition backing. Overall, the position is policy- and value-based, aimed at child welfare and social security.
2024-09-19
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Family Benefits Act (388 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The speaker is critical of and in opposition to the government. They stress the necessity of the draft bill amending the Family Benefits Act for Estonian families, highlighting demographic concerns. At the same time, they express cynicism regarding the coalition's attitude. They emphasize the need for solidarity concerning tax hikes and budget cuts, but they do not support taxing the banking sector (implementing a bank tax). They stress the protection of vulnerable groups—specifically large families, single parents, and young people—and point out that solidarity should not be a unilateral burden placed solely upon them.
2024-09-18
Policy pursued within the administrative domain

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, press briefing

The primary demand is the protection of pension indexing. This stance strongly opposes the current government's proposals, which could potentially decouple indexing. It is argued that inflation and rising prices pose a threat to the most vulnerable segment of pensioners, and that the existing indexing mechanism is crucial for ensuring social security. The position put forward is strongly value-based and non-political, focusing solely on safeguarding pensioners.
2024-09-18
Government Decisions

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, press briefing

The speaker is a critic of the government’s health and tax policies, positioning himself as a defender of the vulnerable. He is vehemently opposed to increasing healthcare spending and the security tax, stressing that these measures disproportionately burden the weakest members of society. Furthermore, he highlights the unnecessary growth of budgetary expenditures and the necessity of reducing duplication. However, he remains convinced of the need to find better, fairer sources of funding, though he does not support implementing a windfall tax on banks.
2024-09-17
Report by the Chancellor of Justice on the compliance of legal instruments with the Constitution and the performance of other duties imposed on the Chancellor of Justice by law.

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

The primary objective is to strongly emphasize adherence to the Constitution and to strengthen popular representation. He is critical of the coalition's procedures and stresses that formal contradiction and the bundling of amendments are unreasonable and undermine the principle of state power representation. He calls upon Riigikogu members to respect the Constitution once again and views his role as the guardian of the Riigikogu in defending the interests of the people.
2024-09-16
2024 Report by the Minister of the Interior on the Implementation of the State's Long-Term Development Strategy "Estonia 2035"

The 15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting.

The primary emphasis is placed on protecting individual rights and civil liberties, alongside maintaining controlled security. The speaker expresses concern regarding the trajectory toward a surveillance society and a police state, stressing the necessity of clarity and transparency as the foundation for decision-making, particularly concerning the potential prohibition of public gatherings. This stance is critical of such expansions and underscores the defense of democratic values, rather than yielding to a hasty, security-driven panic. Consequently, this position advocates for strengthening the protection of rights and democratic procedure, instead of automatically granting additional powers.
2024-07-15
Reconsideration of the Motor Vehicle Tax Act (364 UA) left unpromulgated by the President of the Republic

15th Riigikogu, Extraordinary session of the Riigikogu

The anti-car tax position is coupled with a demand to maintain special tax provisions for people with disabilities; it emphasizes constitutionality and the upholding of European Union rights, relying primarily on a value- and rights-based framework. The stance is firmly oppositional to the coalition's intentions, arguing that tax policy should not exacerbate inequality and should instead focus on providing specific support or tax exemptions for disabled individuals. It shows no clear paradigm shift during the period, but rather maintains consistent opposition to the car tax.
2024-06-14
Second Reading of the Draft State Supplementary Budget Act for 2024 (456 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, additional plenary session

The opposition is highly critical of the entire supplementary budget; it stresses the lack of a strategic budgetary blueprint and instruments designed to foster economic growth. Its position strongly contrasts with the coalition’s approach, arguing that the funding crisis and lost tax revenue are a direct result of the government's policies, and demanding a focus on economic growth and long-term vision, rather than quick fixes.
2024-06-12
Second reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Land Tax Act (437 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.

Opposing the second reading of the draft Land Tax Act; deems the tax hike unfair and precarious, and stresses the necessity of protecting home ownership stability and legal certainty. It points out that the 10% annual agreement has been broken, and the draft legislation will deepen inequality and increase the burden on local municipalities. This is a value-based address that highlights the interests of homeowners and pensioners.
2024-06-12
Third Reading of the Bill on Amendments to the Traffic Act and the Police and Border Guard Act (429 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.

The representative expresses strong opposition to the rapid implementation of the draft bill and the imposition of an 80-euro parking fine. He stresses that the new regulatory framework and the requirement for specific markings will make the urban environment more burdensome for local municipalities and could increase the supervisory load. He recommends slowing down the adoption process and granting a transition period so that both society and local governments have time to adapt, ensuring that prevention remains the priority. Ultimately, his rhetoric is aimed not at excessive haste, but at achieving a measured and sensible solution.
2024-06-12
Third reading of the Draft Act on the Amendment of the State Fee Act and Related Amendments to Other Acts (417 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.

The representative of the Centre Faction is clearly opposed to raising state fees in the context of the third reading. He deems the tax hikes unreasonable, viewing them as a tool for filling the budget rather than serving the public interest, and notes that the increased fees unfairly burden broad segments of the population (including minors, pensioners, and the elderly). He stresses that the government’s digitalization and cost-cutting measures are not functioning equitably, and levels criticism against incompetence and the partisan increase of fees.
2024-06-12
Third reading of the Draft Act on the Amendment of the Motor Insurance Act and Related Amendments to Other Acts (400 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.

As a representative of the Center Party, this draft legislation constitutes a crucial part of the reform planned by the Center Party. We support the substantive amendments within the bill, which aim to increase compensation for non-pecuniary damage, enhance transparency, and establish an obligation for the insurer to assess the extent of the damage. Concurrently, the necessity of addressing disparities in the insurance of electric scooters is noted. A separate legislative proposal is planned to rectify these issues, demonstrating a policy-driven and results-based approach. The scope of the original proposed amendments has been expanded concerning compensation for non-pecuniary damage, and the need to improve transparency and fairness has been emphasized.
2024-06-12
Third Reading of the Draft Act amending the Penal Code and other related Acts (increase of the fine unit) (415 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.

A representative of the Center Party (faction) strongly opposed the government’s planned increase in fines and state fees. He/She voiced principled and forceful opposition to the draft bill, accusing the government of using unreasonable taxation strategies to cover budget deficits, and stressed that the increase in fines would primarily burden the nation's poorer citizens. By submitting alternative amendments, he/she expressed the desire to prevent escalating penalties from becoming the main mechanism causing negative economic and social impact.
2024-06-12
Overview of the Judicial Administration by Villu Kõve, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.

The main problems emphasized are the quality and constitutionality of laws, alongside the desire to keep government activity more impactful for the public. The position is strongly reformist and geared towards reducing regulations, focusing on reducing the burden on the courts and implementing forward-looking, inclusive legislation. Regarding the cross-party platform, the focus remains more on general political criticism aimed at improving how the current situation functions, rather than presenting a specific party plan.
2024-06-11
First Reading of the Riigikogu Draft Statement "On the Crisis of Democracy in Georgia" (449 AE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.

The representative expresses a critical and thoughtful attitude towards the draft, or at least regarding its implementation; they do not show firm support for the freezing of funds and emphasize the need for clarification on how it would practically occur. They note that redirecting funding could be in conflict with the policy of state institutions and create uncertainty. Therefore, their position is moderately oppositional and focused on questions.
2024-06-10
First Reading of the Draft Act on the 2024 Supplementary Budget (456 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The representative is from the opposition and has adopted a critical stance regarding the government’s supplementary budget bill. He/She highlights the cuts—up to 6 million euros for foundations and businesses, 5 million euros for entrepreneurship and innovation activities, 2.5 million euros for tourism promotion, and the reduction in attracting foreign investment—and points out that this could result in a revenue loss of 20–30 million euros. The representative considers such decisions short-sighted and detrimental in the long term, emphasizing the need for a forward-thinking economic policy, rather than merely focusing on short-term costs.
2024-06-06
Second Reading of the Draft Act on the Amendment of the Penal Code and Related Acts (Increase of the Fine Unit) (Bill 415 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The speaker delivers the Center Party faction's critical assessment of draft law 415 SE: he/she expresses strong opposition to the doubling of all fine rates and calls for compromises regarding parking and warning fines. He/She stresses that the priority should be a proportional approach that takes into account people's ability to pay, noting that no prior analysis was conducted; he/she wants to limit the overall increase in penalties, focusing only on specific cases (e.g., speeding). He/She describes the draft law as a political and economic decision focused on state budget revenue, rather than the fragile consequences for society. He/She refers to the need for an approach based on discipline and law enforcement, advocating for decisive value-based and procedural consideration, rather than merely accelerating economic activity.
2024-06-06
Second Reading of the Draft Act on the Amendment of the State Fee Act and the Amendment of Other Related Acts (417 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The representative of the Centre Party is vehemently opposed to the increase in state fees; he emphasizes that 250 euros is disproportionate and violates the legal principle that state fees must cover only the costs associated with the procedure and should not become an additional source of revenue. This position is clearly oriented toward public interest, accessibility, and justice, and he intends to protect the interests of vulnerable groups—minors, pensioners, and people with disabilities—and will boycott the current fee structure of the draft legislation. While previous opinions seem to emphasize economic growth and ensuring the availability of services, the representative offers a prioritized vision that is policy- and value-based and highly critical of the government's tax policy.
2024-06-05
Second reading of the Motor Vehicle Tax Bill (364 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The opposition of the Centre Party faction to the car tax bill emphasizes that the proposed amendments are interconnected and thereby contradictory, and consequently does not support the passage of the bill. It demands separate mitigation measures and gives the impression of highlighting dissent and concerns related to constitutional and European Union law; the overall stance is strongly critical of both the adoption of the law and the procedural organization.
2024-06-03
Inquiry regarding the Directive on Platform Work (No. 629)

Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary sitting.

The representative supports the pro-labor rights direction regarding the Platform Work Directive, emphasizing social guarantees (such as health insurance) and ensuring workers are not treated as "slaves." At the same time, he/she is strongly critical of Bolt’s lobbying efforts and the coalition partners of Eesti 200, stressing the necessity of transparency and the avoidance of conflicts of interest. The representative demands answers and explanations from the ministers and the ministry. His/her approach is seen as value- and procedure-based, focusing on enhancing rights and improving governance, rather than merely engaging in technical debate.
2024-06-03
The written motion for a vote of no confidence in the Minister of Economic Affairs and Information Technology, Tiit Riisalo, submitted by 22 members of the Riigikogu.

Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary sitting.

The opposition's stance regarding Riisalo is that the minister's economic policy and its effectiveness are the central focus of criticism, and his dismissal from office is seen as the solution. They argue that the economic situation is the worst it has been in years, and they demand a new minister from the coalition who would be able to solve the crises. The general tone is the evaluation of policy-making and accountability skills, rather than merely renewing the government by changing a single individual.
2024-05-30
Second Reading of the Draft Act on the Crypto Asset Market (Bill 398 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

According to him, the current form of the draft law is too strict and places an excessive burden on businesses; he has supported the Centre Party's amendments and called for a longer transition period. He emphasizes that effective protective mechanisms are necessary to mitigate risks, but he does not support double documentation or the introduction of burdensome requirements at the expense of entrepreneurs.
2024-05-29
First Reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic to Restore Support for Youth School Sports" (405 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

Supports the reinstatement of the youth school sports support package and is critical of the Ministry of Culture's redistribution of funding; emphasizes the role of the central school sports association and the need for effective nationwide coordination. He/She is a proponent of the budget department's thoroughness and seeks to identify additional resources (e.g., from income tax reform targeting the wealthy) to cover the budgetary deficit. They share the opinion that the current plan is politically and administratively unresolved and requires a strong, unified state funding structure.
2024-05-29
First Reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu (407 OE) "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic regarding the Increase of Support for Youth Extracurricular Activities."

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

Insufficient data.
2024-05-29
First reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic for the Implementation of the Digital Services Tax in Estonia" (408 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The draft bill for the Digital Services Tax (DST) has a strong proponent position; it is emphasized that delays in European Union decisions must not impede fair taxation, and the example set by France demonstrates that the tax can indeed be implemented. He/She points out that Facebook, Google, and Amazon collect data and advertising revenue without being taxed, whereas media companies are taxed, which highlights the need for equalization. He/She is critical of the government's stance on the digital tax and stresses that the digital tax must be put into effect.
2024-05-29
First reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic for Lowering the Value-Added Tax on Domestic Fruits and Vegetables to 5 Percent" (406 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

There is insufficient data. The address focuses on the context and objectives, citing, for example, Latvia's experience and the support of a healthy lifestyle and local entrepreneurship, but it does not express a clear decision either in favor of or against the draft legislation.
2024-05-29
First reading of the Bill amending the Land Tax Act (437 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The perspective is strongly oppositional and highly sensitive to the proposed changes in the land tax bill. He emphasizes the necessity of increasing the revenue base for local municipalities, but opposes measures that would worsen the quality of life for residents or increase tax rates on homes; the core principles articulated are the sanctity of the home and the protection of small local governments. He intends to reject the bill at its first reading, citing the need for a more measured approach and the imperative to avoid widespread uncertainty and significant price increases. The framing is thus not only policy-based (tax policy) but also value-based (home, municipal solidarity).
2024-05-29
Broken promises

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, information briefing

The speaker maintains a strong opposition stance against the coalition. He alleges that the supplementary budget and tax changes are being adopted after the elections to avoid voter backlash, and describes this behavior as reminiscent of the coalition's calculated tactics and voter deception. He points to the need for greater transparency and debate, and demands that these issues be clearly adopted and discussed either before or after the elections, rather than being handled covertly.
2024-05-28
Second Reading of the Bill for the Amendment of the Income Tax Act (416 SE)

15th Riigikogu, third session, plenary session

The speaker opposes the second reading of the draft amendment to the Income Tax Act. They stress the need to protect pensioners and warn of increasing inequality should the bill be adopted. Their message is rooted in fundamental values and social rights, highlighting the absence of the principle of legal certainty for pensioners.
2024-05-27
Inquiry Concerning the Scope of Category B Driving Licences (No. 327)

Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary session

The main focus is on increasing the safety of light traffic and incorporating the training of younger cyclists. It acknowledges that licenses are currently not required for cycling, but seeks to consider educational solutions and the inclusion of training opportunities (e.g., in school curricula). It refers to the international example of the Netherlands and emphasizes the potential of training-based solutions.
2024-05-27
The 2024 Report by the Minister of Social Protection on the Implementation of the State's Long-Term Development Strategy "Estonia 2035"

Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary session

The main stance is increasing social benefits for people with disabilities and exempting people with disabilities from the car tax. The increase in benefits must be independent of the car tax, and the current 18 years of stagnation, resulting in an average benefit of 12.79 euros per month, is unjustified given the rising cost of living. This position is both political and value-based, focusing on ensuring social equality and long-term well-being during the implementation of Estonia 2035.
2024-05-15
Third Reading of the Draft Act on the Protection of Whistleblowers Reporting Workplace Violations of European Union Law (257 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The Centre Party faction opposes the draft bill, deeming it unsuitable for the Estonian context and merely copied from a European Union directive. It emphasizes that the legislation fails to adequately protect whistleblowers and increases the administrative burden on small businesses and local governments, a path that leads toward a punitive state. The faction stresses the need to adapt EU legal acts specifically for the Estonian legal system and to incorporate genuine added value, rather than simply copying them to avoid penalties. Consequently, the faction has decided to adopt this draft bill.
2024-05-15
Government Decisions

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, press briefing

The opposition maintains a critical stance regarding the government's economic policy. It characterizes the economic decline and inflation as a worsening problem, stressing the necessity for concrete measures backed by thorough impact analyses. Furthermore, it is critical of current tax policy and will not support the removal of the tax hump unless it delivers clear financial and social benefits.
2024-05-14
First Reading of the Draft Act Amending the Language Act and the Public Transport Act (Bill 397 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The main issues highlighted concern language policy and the accessibility of information in public sector communication, especially the share of Estonian-language audio advertising and the requirement for recognizably Estonian domain names. The speaker is moderately critical: they ask how the 20% of foreign-language advertisements is calculated and whether it is practically applicable, referring to previous criticism found in ministry opinions. The current position is policy-driven but critical; it does not express a clear alignment regarding any coalition-based support or opposition, but rather focuses on considering the accessibility of information and its applicability.
2024-05-14
First Reading of the Draft Basic Education Act (419 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The representative is focusing on the practical consequences of implementing the draft law on basic education, emphasizing the need to raise qualification requirements while simultaneously anticipating a potential labor shortage. They note that the scarcity of childcare workers and assistant teachers may mean that kindergartens cannot find the necessary specialists, and they urgently inquire where these specialists are supposed to be sourced from. They also point out that the draft law may create new responsibilities (such as establishing a support services coordinator), and clarification regarding the existence and scope of this role is crucial at this juncture. Specifically, they expect a thorough discussion and detailed explanations before moving forward.
2024-05-14
First Reading of the Riigikogu Draft Resolution "Appointment of Oliver Kask as a Justice of the Supreme Court" (424 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

He highlights the potential for an increased workload in administrative courts and the impact the drafts will have on subsequent operational organization. His statement is focused on concern, emphasizing the risks of expanding administrative tasks. Specifically, he does not express a clear stance for or against the drafts, but instead focuses on the need for discussion and risk assessment.
2024-05-13
Interpellation regarding the suffrage of Russian citizens in Estonian local government elections during Russia's war against Ukraine (No. 624)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session

The main position is opposition to the idea of revoking the voting rights of third-country nationals in local elections. The statement emphasizes that the Isamaa draft bill would violate the constitution and must therefore be dismissed; the position appears strong, grounded in the defense of the rule of law and constitutionality.
2024-05-13
Proposal by the Chancellor of Justice for bringing the Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Prevention Act, the Credit Institutions Act, the Law of Obligations Act, and the State Fees Act into conformity with the Constitution

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session

The main topics are restrictions on non-cash payment of state fees and fines, and enforcement agent costs. The address is critical of these restrictions and calls for finding solutions that improve citizens' accessibility, but it does not express a specific political platform.
2024-05-08
First reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Motor Third Party Liability Insurance Act and Consequential Amendments to Other Acts (400 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session.

The main topic is the compensation for non-pecuniary damage under motor insurance and establishing the corresponding amounts; the position is reformist but moderate, focusing on the need to amend the draft bill and increase transparency. He/She emphasizes that existing shortcomings must be addressed, noting that while case law has evolved, the legislation has not. The goal is to improve the protection afforded to people following accidents.
2024-05-08
Second Reading of the Draft Act on the Protection of Whistleblowers Reporting Work-Related Infringements of European Union Law (257 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session.

The opposition is strongly criticizing the bill in its current form. It emphasizes that the list of violations is too narrow and fails to cover crucial areas such as corruption, and sees a danger in the excessive burden placed on businesses and local governments. It supports whistleblower protection but demands a thorough analysis and a separate vote on the bill's title. The Center Party faction does not support the current content of the bill.
2024-05-08
First Reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic Regarding the Imposition of a Temporary Solidarity Tax on the Banking Sector" (367 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session.

The most crucial topics are the rejection of the temporary solidarity tax on the banking sector and broader criticism of tax increases. He is strongly opposed to the government's plans and emphasizes that a one-time windfall profit tax on banks should not be implemented, suggesting a balanced approach to bank taxation as an alternative. The framing is policy-driven and value-based, focusing on legal certainty and equality.
2024-05-08
State and Church

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing

He expresses strong criticism of the prime minister, accusing him of misleading the public. He emphasizes that the Estonian Orthodox Church does not support Russian aggression and prays for Ukraine, for those suffering, and for a swift end to the war. The position is strongly value-based and moral, focusing on the country's ethical framework and the pursuit of peace.
2024-05-08
Government Decisions

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing

The opposition holds a strongly critical stance regarding the government's decisions. It states that the doubling of fines and the increase in state fees are merely aimed at filling the budget, and it does not support rapidly implementable changes without thorough impact assessments and consideration of effectiveness. It demands that all legislative amendments be fully justified and timed fairly for the public.
2024-05-07
Second Reading of the Draft Act Amending the 2024 State Budget Act (389 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

Being in opposition and highly critical of the coalition, it stresses the failure to deliver on promises concerning teachers' salaries and the government's inability to manage problem-solving. The focus is on assigning accountability, ensuring financial aid is directed properly, and demanding the money back if any misuse has occurred. This approach is heavily based on a performance and outcome-based assessment, concentrating on the quality of the government's work and the fulfillment of its pledges.
2024-05-07
First Reading of the Draft Resolution (410 OE) of the Riigikogu titled "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic to Find a Solution for the Construction of an Extension to the National Opera Estonia"

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The primary emphasis is on the preservation of culture and heritage protection. It is critical of the coalition's potential loosening of restrictions and emphasizes that the current mechanisms are not supported by the current conditions. The position is value-based and policy-oriented, moving cautiously towards stronger protective restrictions.
2024-05-07
Third Reading of the Draft Act on the Amendment of the Riigikogu Election Act and the Amendment of Other Related Acts (Bill 344 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The representative of the Centre Party faction emphasizes that the proposed e-voting bill is highly controversial and fundamentally threatens the core principles of democracy. They believe the bill fails to resolve existing security and transparency issues inherent in e-voting and could significantly increase the risks of third-party interference. Furthermore, they argue that the coalition is attempting to ram through unpopular changes while simultaneously restricting the opposition, and therefore urges a vote "against" the measure. This represents a strong political position rooted in core values and principles, centered on defending democracy and ensuring procedural fairness.
2024-05-06
A written motion submitted by 22 members of the Riigikogu for a vote of no confidence in the Minister of Education and Research, Kristina Kallas

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.

The primary focus is the criticism directed at Minister Kristina Kallas regarding accountability and questioning the government's effectiveness in implementing education policy. The speaker is clearly oppositional, posing specific questions about how many school and kindergarten principals should resign in September and why promises, such as salary increases for teachers, have not been fulfilled. The rhetoric is strongly oriented toward strict oversight of accountability and results—a goal achieved through the evaluation of government activities and public questioning.
2024-05-06
Continuation of the first reading of the Draft Statement of the Riigikogu "On declaring the Moscow Patriarchate an institution supporting the military aggression of the Russian Federation" (Bill 420 AE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.

The primary political stance emphasizes dialogue and cooperation concerning the draft legislation; it expresses no strong position either for or against the bill's adoption. It is stressed that solutions must be found by involving various stakeholders and by considering statutory and legal amendments. This position is process- and law-based rather than ideological.
2024-05-02
First Reading of the Riigikogu Draft Statement (420 AE) "On Declaring the Moscow Patriarchate an Institution Supporting the Military Aggression of the Russian Federation"

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The representative focuses on statesmanship and respect for religious sensitivity, emphasizing the importance of multi-stakeholder dialogue and procedural arrangements. He does not express a clear substantive position regarding the content of the draft bill, but rather seeks in the statement to find a solution through taking a recess and cooperating with representatives of the Church. The position is rather conciliatory and values-based, not populist or radical.
2024-05-02
Continuation of the first reading of the Bill on the Tax on Sweetened Beverages (418 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The stance is critical yet moderate regarding the government's tax policy. It emphasizes that new taxes (including the sugar tax, car tax, VAT, income tax, and excises) must be carefully weighed during an economic crisis, and it does not support rushing their implementation. It argues that measures introduced during an economic boom will not function identically during a recession and could penalize entrepreneurs and citizens. Furthermore, it highlights the necessity of a comprehensive and coordinated financing model and stresses adherence to European Union law and state aid requirements.
2024-04-30
First Reading of the Draft Act on the Amendment of the Penal Code and the Amendment of Other Related Acts (Increasing the Fine Unit) (Bill 415 SE)

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session.

The Center Party faction opposes the draft legislation aimed at increasing the fine unit and state fees, demanding a thorough analysis of both its efficacy and economic impact. The faction deemed it critical that the initial debate focused primarily on increasing budgetary revenues. Furthermore, the faction characterizes this intention as merely a tool for meeting budgetary targets, rather than an improvement in public welfare, emphasizing that any acceptable solution must be based on a considered and socially just approach. The central recommendation put forward is the rejection of the draft legislation and the requirement for a comprehensive analysis.
2024-04-29
Inquiry regarding the conflict between the motor vehicle tax and the Constitution and European Union law (No. 623)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The Car Tax Controversy: The speaker opposes the car tax and presents strong arguments that the draft legislation may conflict with both the Constitution and European Union law. He stresses that people with disabilities, large families, and pensioners fall within the scope of special calculations and will suffer due to unreasonable costs—therefore demanding the withdrawal of the bill and answers to the inquiry addressed to the Prime Minister, specifically regarding the lack of exemptions and the necessity for additional support.
2024-04-29
Interpellation regarding the incompatibility of the motor vehicle tax with European Union law (No. 622)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The core stance is opposition to the adoption of the car tax bill and the demand for its withdrawal. It is stressed that the registration fee is discriminatory and violates both European Union law and the constitution. The tone is strong and critical, focusing heavily on the rule of law and democratic principles. As an alternative, the proposal includes potential exemptions and the channeling of tax revenue into road and innovation programs.
2024-04-17
Second Reading of the Draft Act (344 SE) on the Amendment of the Riigikogu Election Act and Related Amendment of Other Acts

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

An opposition figure and a defender of democratic norms. It opposed the coalition's method of altering and bundling the opposition's amendments, and stressed that obstruction is a necessary tool for protecting the interests of the electorate. On a broader level, it advocates for transparency, trust, and the protection of private data, and criticized the rapid implementation of mobile voting solutions without sufficient guarantees.
2024-04-16
The Minister of Culture's 2024 Report on the Implementation of the State's Long-Term Development Strategy "Estonia 2035" (including the implementation of the "Estonian Sports Policy Fundamentals until 2030")

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

It is claimed that the Ministry of Culture’s decision regarding the financing of school and recreational sports was poorly articulated and is causing confusion; the speaker is critical of the distribution of the funding. The decisions that were made are described as "hypocritical," and the speaker calls for the need to ensure coordination and transparency, indicating strong opposition to the current status quo. The position is policy- and value-driven, focusing on the better alignment of youth physical activity and sports policy as a key priority.
2024-04-15
Interpellation concerning the state of traffic in Estonia (No. 593)

Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary session

The main point of criticism regarding the draft legislation is that the doubling of fines is seen primarily as a motive for budget fulfillment, and it lacks any impact on traffic behavior. He/She emphasizes the need for an impact analysis and cooperation with the ministry before the decision is made. The position is critical and stresses that the decision should be based on evidence and the improvement of traffic safety, not solely on filling the budget.
2024-04-10
First Reading of the Draft Act on the Amendment of the Competition Act and the Amendment of Other Associated Acts (384 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session

The Representative is strongly opposed to Bill 384 SE: he argues that the bill creates a new body for sanctions and administrative fines within the Competition Authority and increases the government's regulatory powers. He emphasizes that during a crisis, the economy should be supported, not the mechanism of penalties strengthened, and demands a comparative analysis and the utilization of existing misdemeanor procedures. He considers the coalition's political choice dangerous and views the creation of a parallel legal system as a threat to fundamental constitutional due process.
2024-04-10
Government decisions

15th Estonian Parliament, third sitting, information briefing

The speech centers on criticizing the government’s fiscal policy and the perceived importance of maintaining tax breaks for the wealthy; the speaker is highly committed to reducing injustice and protecting lower-income individuals. He is directly opposed to the income tax reform that favors high-earners and the salary increase for members of the Riigikogu (Parliament), arguing that these measures would cripple the budget and exacerbate inequality. He also stresses that tax hikes and specific levies, such as the proposed car tax and sugar tax, disproportionately harm those with lower incomes, placing social justice and the protection of jobs and education at the forefront of his concerns.
2024-04-10
Cars

15th Estonian Parliament, third sitting, information briefing

The most important issue is the position against the car tax bill; it is stressed that the bill is discriminatory and contrary to European Union law and the constitution. The withdrawal of the bill is demanded, and the government's impractical governance and the wasting of taxpayer money are highlighted. Support is given to promoting strong, lawful, and financial accountability based on rights and the described risks.
2024-04-09
First Reading of the Crypto-Asset Market Act Bill (398 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

A strong opposition has been mounted against the draft bill in question. The speaker represents the position of the Centre Party faction, a stance characterized by criticism regarding the bill's strictness and its potential to close off the market. The style of the critique is policy- and economics-driven, with the ultimate goal being to reject the bill or amend it significantly.
2024-04-09
Report by the Minister of Economic Affairs and Information Technology on the implementation of the state's long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035"

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The primary emphasis is on a stable and predictable regulatory environment and investment certainty. He/She is critical of hastily adopted tax amendments and inadequate impact assessments, stressing the necessity for measured, analysis-based decisions. He/She demonstrates a commitment to moving towards genuinely implementable steps, rather than just rhetoric, and highlights the proper adaptation of EU directives through comprehensive analysis. (The political position is thus reformist and investment-friendly, yet critical of the current decision-making process.)
2024-04-08
Interpellation concerning the promises made regarding teachers' salary increases (No. 580)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The primary political focus is increasing teachers' wages and criticizing the coalition for failing to fulfill its promises. The representative adopts a strong oppositional stance, accusing the government of breaking its word and squandering resources, while simultaneously emphasizing the state's responsibility, as the provider of the salary fund, to local governments on this matter. The leadership is focused on policy and results, rather than just personal disputes.
2024-04-08
Interpellation Regarding the Unified Estonian School (No. 544)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The main focus is highlighting the needs of SEN children and seeking better support for students with special needs. It is critical of the coalition's spin and emphasizes that solutions must be found through cooperation, not through accusations. Cooperation and the use of evidence-based measures are seen as the necessary tools, rather than emotional political rhetoric.
2024-04-08
Interpellation Regarding the Need to Support Large Families (No. 339)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The primary position involves protecting the rights of large families and families with disabilities, and advocating for special provisions or additional forms of support concerning the car tax. The party is strongly opposed to the coalition’s tax policy, stressing the importance of legal certainty, the failure to fulfill promises, and the necessity of protecting the most vulnerable groups. The focus remains on value-based and budgetary policy, rather than on limited, ready-made solutions that families perceive merely as tax burdens.
2024-04-03
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the 2024 State Budget Act (389 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The central focus remains the salary conditions for teachers and the management of school funding. The opposition accuses the coalition of poor governance and breaking promises, emphasizing the necessity of a faster and more accountable decision-making process. Furthermore, they primarily point out that the promised salary increases have not yet materialized and the fulfillment of state commitments has been inefficiently delayed.
2024-04-03
Pension Taxation

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing

Seeking government accountability and transparency is the primary stance; the speaker is highly critical of the PM, stressing that questions are going unanswered. He raises the issue of the coalition's makeup (whether the Center Party or the Reform Party is in government) and brings up criticism of decisions made previously, which symbolizes the need for opposition oversight. The style is probing and confrontational, utilizing accusations and questions rather than a solution-oriented approach.
2024-04-03
New taxes

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing

The speaker is highly critical of the government's tax policy, arguing that the primary goals for utilizing tax instruments should be social justice and effective financing. He emphasizes that the sugar tax must be implemented alongside other measures and asserts that the government has chosen a cynical path focused purely on revenue collection. He also proposes alternative types of taxation (a bank tax, a digital tax) and calls for a focus on better funding for healthcare and children's welfare, rather than simply introducing new taxes.
2024-04-02
First reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic to Abandon the Imposition of the Car Tax and Withdraw the Motor Vehicle Tax Bill from the Riigikogu Proceedings" (374 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting

The Centre Party is vehemently opposed to the motor vehicle tax and demands the withdrawal of the draft bill, arguing that its implementation would be unacceptably in conflict with both European Union legislation and the Estonian Constitution. Their stance is clearly oppositional regarding the tax proposal, and they accuse the government of risking financial damage to the state and incurring large interest payments. They also stress that the focus of their deliberation is solely on legal certainty and the protection of fundamental values; contacts are also planned with the President to ensure the bill cannot enter into force if it conflicts with the Constitution or EU law.
2024-04-01
Interpellation regarding the non-payment of salaries to teachers (No. 601)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The opposition maintains a critical stance, characteristic of its focus on the leadership crisis: it accuses the government and its coalition partners of presenting an incomplete set of solutions and highlights the prolonged delay in assuming responsibility and releasing necessary data. While the opposition supports the overall goal of raising teachers' salaries, it deems the implementation of the funding and the substantive content of the plan insufficient. Furthermore, it blames ineffective management for the failure of the allocated funds to actually reach the salaries.
2024-04-01
Interpellation concerning the consequences of reducing family benefits (No. 561)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The core argument is that the government's tax hikes disproportionately burden large families and the poor; the group is strongly opposed to both the sugar tax and the car tax, and stresses the necessity of protecting the legal security of families. It views tax policy primarily as a means of filling budget gaps and criticizes the apparent use of tax changes to cover pre-election promises. The framing is strongly value-based and constitutional in nature; as an alternative, it proposes a unified approach that would better protect children and family livelihoods.
2024-03-20
Government Decisions

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, press briefing.

The Center Party faction is firmly opposed to the car tax bill and stresses its lack of compliance with both the Constitution and European Union law. Their position is forceful, non-vindictive, and emphasizes adherence to the law: they recommend withdrawing the bill and replacing it with specific exemptions and social compensations. They also stress the need to protect vulnerable groups (people with disabilities, large families, and low-income families) and find ways to redistribute the tax burden, rather than increasing poverty through the implementation of a general tax. No shifts are visible compared to previous periods; the faction remains a consistent unit focused on legality and social justice.
2024-03-19
The 2024 Report by the Minister of Health on the implementation of the state's long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035"

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

As Minister of Health, he/she stresses the sustainability of healthcare financing, quality, and prevention as three pillars central to long-term development; he/she criticizes the Reform Party's tax policy as being too narrow a solution and emphasizes that taxes do not solve health problems for the state budget alone. He/she asserts that the priority must be strengthening healthcare and securing funding within the current economic climate; ultimately aiming to implement lasting development through the Estonia 2035 strategy. The framing is policy-based and value-oriented, focusing on the long-term well-being and fiscal efficiency of the healthcare system.
2024-03-18
Inquiry concerning the justification of the activities of the Prosecutor's Office and the Security Police Board (KaPo) (No. 528)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The primary topics are safeguarding the independence of the legal system and defining the boundaries of operation between the Prosecutor's Office and the Internal Security Service (Kaitsepolitseiamet). He/She stresses the necessity of avoiding intervention and establishing clear limits to rebuild confidence; the viewpoint is critical concerning the risk of potential interference. His/Her position is centered on values and accountability, focusing on guaranteeing institutional balance and responsibility.
2024-03-18
Interpellation concerning problems related to the restriction on official actions (No. 320)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The legal consistency and clarity in the application of the procedural restriction is his primary focus. He questions whether prior information suggests an interpretation that shifts over time, and whether this demonstrates the necessity for a more precise and unified legal framework. He also emphasizes that the potential documentation concerning the exclusion of individuals generates apprehension, necessitating a clearer and better-safeguarded legal order. The tone is critical yet constructive: he demands explanation and improvements regarding how the laws are applied.
2024-03-18
Interpellation concerning the Pet Register (No. 594)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

Establishing a nationwide pet register is the speaker’s primary objective; he/she supports this solution and deems it essential for ensuring the welfare and safety of animals. He/She emphasizes the need for cross-party consensus and the necessity of moving forward so that the draft bill can reach the Riigikogu (Parliament). He/She focuses on removing procedural obstacles and stresses that the solution must be unified and aimed at reducing the fragmentation among local registers.
2024-03-13
The Present and Future Challenges Facing the Domestic Food Industry

15th Estonian Parliament, third sitting, information briefing

The political stance centers on adherence to parliamentary order and protocol; the individual is critical of the Prime Minister's discourteous comments and stresses the importance of following procedural rules. They support the Speaker's swift response to the disruption and the interruption of the PM's address, thereby prioritizing decorum. The political orientation is critical of the PM, but lacks specific policy plans regarding the food industry.
2024-03-13
Rule of Law

15th Estonian Parliament, third sitting, information briefing

Emphasizes the protection of constitutional rights and human dignity, as well as adherence to the principles of the rule of law. It argues that the car tax bill lacks special provisions for people with disabilities and could therefore be detrimental to them; it stresses the necessity of state support measures and exceptions. It is strongly critical of government bills that infringe upon fundamental rights or worsen the economic environment.
2024-03-11
Interpellation Concerning the Negative Impacts of the Motor Vehicle Tax on Families with Children (No. 602)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session

The Centre Party opposes the car tax and stresses that the tax must be made fairer and impose a smaller burden on vulnerable groups. They demand special benefits for large families, single parents, and pensioners, and propose an alternative, such as an excess profit tax on banks. This position is strongly rooted in values and constitutional principles, emphasizing the protection of welfare state principles and adherence to constitutional rights.
2024-03-11
Interpellation concerning Estonia's critical demographic situation (No. 597)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session

The opposition maintains a critical stance toward the government, focusing specifically on demography and family benefits. They strongly criticize the proposed car tax and general tax hikes, as well as the impact of rising real estate prices on young people. The opposition claims that while the government raises support payments just before elections, they later revoke them. This practice fundamentally undermines the public's sense of legal certainty and the consistency of state commitments. Their position is rooted in a value-based and policy-driven understanding that the state has a duty to provide special care for large families and to improve the overall demographic situation.
2024-03-06
Government Decisions

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, press briefing

The position against the car tax is of central importance and is framed as legally and socially unjust. It is stressed that the tax particularly harms vulnerable groups and may potentially conflict with European Union law. A windfall profit tax on banks is proposed as an alternative. Furthermore, it is emphasized that the proposed amendments are substantive, with the goal being to slow down the bill's legislative process. The overall framing is strongly policy-driven and value-based, highlighting deficiencies in the impact assessment and stressing the need for fairness.
2024-03-04
Interpellation concerning the impact of the motor vehicle tax (No. 610)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The position against the car tax. The speaker highlights that the tax could be unfair and economically detrimental, and calls for the withdrawal of the draft bill, proposing instead the taxation of banks' excess profits. They support the protections put in place for the interests of sports and rural areas, stressing that tax policy must be fair and compensatory, rather than an added burden on the middle class and those residing in the countryside.
2024-03-04
Interpellation concerning the introduction of the vehicle tax (No. 304)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The most crucial topics are the implementation of the car tax and the synergy between taxation and infrastructure funding. The speaker is critical of the government's actions, stressing that investments in road repair and infrastructure have been cut and that tax policy fails to consider the impact on various regions. The position is political and emphasizes coordination, demanding better coordination between decisions and due consideration for the mobility needs of rural areas.
2024-03-04
Interpellation concerning the rise in the cost of living in Estonia (No. 599)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

An oppositional position centered on protecting the interests of the people. It criticizes the government's banking policy and its communication, which affects low-income individuals, emphasizing that rising prices hit them the hardest. The primary focus is on safeguarding legal certainty and legitimate expectation, as well as making decisions in the public interest and increasing public confidence.
2024-03-04
Interpellation Regarding the Temporary Taxation of Banks' Excess Profits (No. 595)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The main stance is against the car tax and triple taxation; the speaker criticizes the government's tax policy as being overly burdensome for ordinary citizens. He emphasizes that taxing people three ways is unfair compared to the issue of taxing banks' excess profits, and seeks to highlight the questions of legal certainty and fundamental equality. He prioritizes finding an alternative financing model that does not increase the burden on ordinary people.
2024-02-14
First Reading of the Motor Vehicle Tax Bill (364 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The representative is strongly opposed to the proposed car tax. He characterizes the triple taxation as onerous and suggests a one-time additional bank tax instead. He stresses that taxes are already increasing due to rising VAT and excise duties, which further drives up costs for vehicle owners. His tone is critical and policy-driven, focusing on the tax system reform as an unjust and burdensome solution.
2024-02-14
Immigration

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing

Insufficient data
2024-02-14
Government policy

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing

The position centers on the strong adoption of the proposed car tax plan and the counterarguments raised against it. It describes the tripling of taxes (VAT, excise, and a separate, standalone car tax) as an increased burden on car owners, arguing that this will hamper both consumption and investment. It highlights the worsening state of mobility, particularly in rural areas, if the plan fails to provide adequate corresponding solutions. Consequently, the stance taken is strongly oppositional, focusing on the tax policy as inherently poor and impractical.
2024-02-07
First reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Higher Education Act (291 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting.

The speaker draws attention to the problems concerning the funding of higher education institutions and the threats arising from the school provisions of the Language Act, while being critical of EKRE's radical draft bill. He/She emphasizes the preservation of Estonian-language higher education and calls for a coordinated financial model and a greater state contribution (at least 1.5% of GDP) in a manner that ensures the competitiveness of universities and encourages students to remain in the country. The style is conventional and prioritizes the sustainability of funding and language policy as core values, rather than fleeting populist reform.
2024-02-07
Road Maintenance Plan and Road Conditions

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing

The speaker demonstrates strong opposition to the government's road maintenance plan, claiming that investments in road upkeep will be cut in half. He asks directly whether the car tax is intended to halve the number of vehicles, and this stance symbolizes criticism of the strategy and demands for accountability, rather than cooperation. The position is clearly political and appears to be driven by policy and debate, rather than sector-specific contentment or ideological conviction.
2024-02-05
Interpellation regarding the abolition of the special VAT rate for accommodation establishments (No. 289)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting

Strong opposition has been voiced against the abolition of the VAT special rate for accommodation establishments. Opponents stress the critical importance of the policy's impact on the economy, job retention, and the promotion of regional life, noting the absence of a comprehensive impact assessment; they are calling for mitigation measures or even a complete reversal of the decision. It has been indicated that the decision was based on insufficient analysis and could inflict disproportionate damage on large communities. Lane's emphasis is on balancing the costs and benefits and ensuring a thorough review of the policy before taking any further steps.
2024-01-24
Review of the Implementation of the "Fundamentals of Legislation Policy until 2030" in 2022

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

Most significantly, it is important to emphasize the transparency, inclusion, constitutionality, and the importance of impact analysis in lawmaking. There is a strong, but not politically detailed, position criticizing accelerated drafts and emphasizing that laws must carry justification and demonstrate the necessity of state intervention. It highlights the assurance of effective control and the prevalence of impact within the field as a central objective, and shows that for him/her, this is primarily a matter of evaluation and the development of legislative practice, rather than merely a political programmatic front.
2024-01-24
Teachers

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing

The central theme of the speech is the opposition to the government regarding the funding of teachers' salaries. He emphasizes that the salary budget originates from the state, and any demagogic claims to the contrary are unfounded. He demands concrete action and accountability, including the recovery of funds or recourse to the administrative court.
2024-01-23
Overview of the state of Research and Development and government policy in this field.

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

Strong defense of funding for education and research and development (R&D), and the promotion of a knowledge-based economy. There is a receptive desire to shift the priorities of budget experts: teachers’ salaries must be raised and funding for higher education and science increased (specifically, 120% of the average teacher’s salary; 1.5% of GDP allocated to higher education funding; and 3% of total funding dedicated to R&D, with the private sector contributing at least 2% of that total). [The subject] criticizes the government’s intention to reallocate funds at the expense of other underfunded sectors; emphasizing that this does not solve the underlying problem and demanding less political infighting and a broad-based consensus. Framing: The core values of the growth strategy for sector management and economic growth are education and science, which must be independent of politics and based on consensus.
2024-01-17
First Reading of the Bill on Amendments to the Income Tax Act (102 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The main position focuses on cooperation and compromise with the coalition; it does not express a firm preference regarding the income tax rate or any specific draft bill, but instead wants the presenter to put forward the best solution for the coalition. They point out that the coalition has previously voted down similar bills, which demonstrates the need to find a mutually viable solution.
2024-01-17
Teachers' Salaries

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing

Oppositional and critical of the government; it stresses that education is primarily a state responsibility and that the teachers' salary fund must be sourced from the state budget (strong, policy-driven). It ridicules the standoff between the coalition and local municipalities and calls for the teachers' wage issue to be resolved through cooperation and coalition negotiations (strong, policy-driven).
2024-01-17
Transition to Estonian-language education

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing

No data available.
2024-01-16
First Reading of the Draft Act Amending the Public Prosecutor's Office Act (105 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The speaker opposes the draft bill and stresses the necessity of maintaining the independence of the Prosecutor's Office. He expresses concern that oversight by the Ministry of Justice could lead to increased political influence, pointing specifically to the Reform Party's role in the minister's background and affiliation. This position is strongly oppositional and is framed as a value-based defense of the legal system.
2024-01-16
First Reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu (104 OE), titled "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic to Remove the So-Called Bronze Soldier Statue from Public Space"

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The coalition appears intent on moving the bill forward and continuing the proceedings. It seems the coalition does not wish to support EKRE's draft bill.
2024-01-15
Interpellation concerning the enhancement of the wartime indirect fire capability of the Defense Forces (No. 72)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.

Insufficient data.
2024-01-15
Interpellation concerning the construction of a nuclear power plant (No. 41)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.

The coalition lacks a firm stance regarding the nuclear power plant. The speaker emphasizes the necessity of a report, noting that the project is so massive that the government's capability must be assessed before any further steps are taken. He/She maintains a critical perspective, focusing on cautious, information-based decision-making rather than issuing final recommendations for support. Furthermore, the speaker points out the disadvantages of the nuclear plant and the security risks that could emerge given the context of Ukraine, underscoring the need for thorough consideration and risk assessment.
2024-01-15
Interpellation concerning the unified Estonian school (No. 13)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.

Supports the idea of a unified Estonian-language school, but stresses that its meaning and the details of its implementation are currently unclear and clarity must be achieved. The questions raised indicate a critical stance on the speaker's part: he wants concrete, practical solutions, not general slogans. It appears that his position is policy-driven and is based on the idea of increasing clarity and accountability.
2024-01-11
First reading of the Bill for the Amendment of the Vital Statistics Registration Act (106 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

Crucial and essential: In the context of the first reading of the draft Act amending Act 106 SE, the problem is profound and requires a solution. It is emphasized that the Ministry of the Interior, the Ministry of Social Affairs, and the Ministry of Justice have collaboratively sought a resolution, and the situation demonstrates the impact of documentation deficiencies on civil status procedures. The stance is strongly oriented towards enhancing policy and service quality.
2024-01-10
Overview by the Government of the Republic concerning the stability support provided by the European Stability Mechanism and the participation of the Republic of Estonia in the European Stability Mechanism

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The main focus is on the importance of ratifying the amendments to the ESM founding treaty and Italy's role in that process. The discussion is exploratory and collaborative: it emphasizes the need for reform while raising questions about Italy's underlying reasons and discussing potential changes, without expressing outright opposition.
2024-01-10
Support for Regions

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing

The speaker is critical regarding the financing of regional development and local governments, noting that the policy of redistribution does not make local governments wealthier. He/She emphasizes the necessity of receiving specific examples and forecasts that would demonstrate the utilization of the additional funding and its impact on investments or European financing. The style is analytical and demanding, focusing on evidentiary material and improved control over the funding.
2024-01-10
Economy

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing

Opposition stance; a critical view of the government's economic policy and tax hikes. The speech stresses that the tax policy is causing panic and undermining public confidence. Therefore, these decisions must be reviewed, and the tax increases must be eliminated or reduced. The objective is to revitalize the economy through investment, and the state's focus must fundamentally be on restoring growth, not on short-term revenue generation.
2024-01-08
Inquiry Regarding Support Specialists (No. 487)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.

Supports increasing the number of support specialists and improving mental health services in schools. The position is strong and policy-driven, emphasizing the creation of a national or centralized system that would connect municipalities and specialists. It is critical of the practice based on local government procurement and prefers a unified funding and resource allocation system.
2024-01-08
Interpellation Regarding the Overall Impact of the Tax Package (No. 443)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.

The core position focuses on the adequacy of education funding and the distribution of responsibility. He/She is critical of the state's assertion that the increase in teachers' salaries is the fault of local municipalities, and emphasizes that the state must allocate sufficient funds for education and avoid shifting responsibility onto local governments. He/She promotes solutions based on a collaborative and inclusive approach and wishes to discuss matters with municipalities at a shared table, rather than simply pushing central responsibility forward. He/She does not show firm support regarding the impact of the tax package but stresses the crucial nature of the state's financial role in education.
2024-01-08
Inquiry Regarding the Closure of Rural Schools (No. 406)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.

He emphasizes the state's role in financing teacher salary increases and ensuring the provision of education. He notes that it is harder for smaller municipalities to cope with the salary increases and stresses that this is the responsibility of the state. He expresses concern about the upcoming strike and calls for continued joint negotiations to resolve the situation.
2024-01-08
Interpellation concerning the rise in costs (No. 354)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.

A critical stance is being taken regarding the financing of local governments and the shaping of tax policy. He emphasizes that tax increases could strip funds from municipalities, hindering investments and the application for European funding, and demands concrete data concerning these impacts. The primary objective is the scrutiny of redistribution and financially superficial decisions, in order to support smaller municipalities through investments and the utilization of EU funding.