By Agendas: Annely Akkermann

Total Agendas: 142

Fully Profiled: 142

2025-10-13
First Reading of the Draft Act on the 2025 State Supplementary Budget (733 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The rhetorical style is very formal, objective, and informative. The speaker presents facts from the finance committee's discussion, questions, and procedural decisions, avoiding emotional or personal evaluations. Official language is used, and voting results are referenced.
2025-10-09
First Reading of the Bill on Amendments to the Motor Vehicle Tax Act (625 SE)

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The speaker's style is formal, procedural, and rational, focusing on facts and official standpoints. He relies heavily on logical arguments, citing the President's decision, the Chancellor of Justice's letter, and the Government's opinion to defend his positions. The tone is argumentative and calm, even when responding to opposing questions.
2025-10-09
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Value-Added Tax Act (661 SE)

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The rhetorical style is confrontational and authoritative, leveling direct accusations of the opponent's incompetence during the budget reading. Analogies emphasizing hierarchy and order (president, boatswain, car) are employed, and references are made to statements by President Meri. The criticism targets both the substance and the procedure, stressing that certain actions are simply not permissible.
2025-10-08
Continuation of the first reading of the Draft Law on the State Budget for 2026 (737 SE)

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The style is formal and informative, given that it is presenting the steering committee's report, but it also incorporates irony (specifically regarding Isamaa’s budget recommendations) and a robust defense of the political choices made. It employs logical and mathematical arguments to defend the tax policy, stressing that eliminating the tax bracket distortion benefits the average worker most significantly. The tone is generally constructive, but becomes defensive when addressing opposition questions concerning administrative costs or the allocation of taxes.
2025-10-06
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Motor Vehicle Tax Act (Bill 677 SE)

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The style is formal, procedural, and fact-based, emphasizing chronology (dates, figures) and the work undertaken by the commission. The speaker employs logical arguments to defend both the speed and the thoroughness of the legislative process. When responding to questions, the speaker adopts a defensive tone, specifically rejecting the comparison of legal discussions to a "puppy." The speaker favors a laconic and rapid approach to ensure urgent problems are addressed.
2025-10-06
First reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Motor Vehicle Tax Act (694 SE)

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The rhetorical style is formal, procedural, and explanatory, characteristic of a committee rapporteur. The speaker relies heavily on logical arguments, referencing the explanatory memorandum, specific sections of the law, and concrete data. The tone is predominantly neutral and accommodating, allowing for additional information to be requested from the Tax Board for the second reading if necessary, but remains firm when refuting colleagues' misunderstandings.
2025-09-11
The Financial Supervision Authority's 2024 Report

15th Riigikogu, 6th plenary sitting

The speaker employs a courteous and respectful tone, commencing with traditional forms of address. The style is analytical and reflective, utilizing "more philosophical" questions and a structured approach involving two specific questions.
2025-09-04
Chair implementation

15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu

The speaking style is formal and strictly compliant with protocol, utilizing standard salutations such as "Esteemed Chairman" and "Dear Colleagues." The tone is neutral and businesslike, focusing on the delivery of facts without any emotional or persuasive elements. The phrasing is concise and specific.
2025-06-19
Draft Law on Annulment of the Motor Vehicle Tax Act (647 SE) - First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The speaking style is formal and cautious, frequently acknowledging a lack of knowledge or expressing uncertainty. It employs a diplomatic approach, avoiding direct assertions on topics where certainty is lacking. It relies on procedure rather than substantive argumentation.
2025-06-18
Draft law (666 SE) for terminating the agreement for the avoidance of double taxation of income tax and the prevention of tax evasion between the Republic of Estonia and the Republic of Belarus - second reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

It uses an official, protocol-driven style, employing traditional expressions of courtesy and a structured presentation. The address is factual and devoid of emotion, focusing strictly on procedural aspects. It concludes briefly and politely with, "That is all from me. Thank you!"
2025-06-18
Third reading of the draft law on the state's supplementary budget for 2025 (651 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

Uses a factual, detailed style, relying on numerical data and concrete examples. The tone is official and procedural, but becomes sharper when debating the opposition. It concludes with the emotional appeal, "Tell the truth!" when the speaker feels they have been misrepresented.
2025-06-18
Draft law (645 SE) for the third reading amending the Simplified Taxation Act for Entrepreneurial Income, the Income Tax Act, and declaring the Security Levy Act invalid.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

Adopts a direct and critical tone, accusing opposition speakers of addressing the wrong item on the agenda. The speaker relies heavily on numerical arguments and facts, employing emotionally charged phrases such as "tax hump" and "a stone around the taxpayer’s neck." The speech concludes with a direct appeal to support the draft legislation.
2025-06-11
Second reading of the draft law on the state's supplementary budget for 2025 (651 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

Employs an official, fact-based style, relying on specific figures and established procedure. Maintains a diplomatic tone even when addressing critical issues, avoiding direct confrontations. Repeatedly stresses legal restrictions and procedures, utilizing an explanatory approach when dealing with complex subjects.
2025-06-10
The Chairman of the Supreme Court’s overview of court orders, the administration of justice, and the uniform application of laws.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.

Uses a polite and formal tone, beginning with an expression of gratitude toward the server. Questions are presented in a structured and logical manner, utilizing specific examples to support the argument. The style is analytical rather than emotional.
2025-06-09
Draft law (666 SE) for terminating the agreement between the Republic of Estonia and the Republic of Belarus for the avoidance of double taxation of income and the prevention of tax evasion – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

It employs an official, fact-based, and neutral tone. The discourse is structured and rich in information, focusing on procedural details and the outcomes of the commission's work. The style is reportorial rather than emotional, emphasizing consensual decision-making.
2025-05-22
Draft law amending the Value Added Tax Act (596 SE) – First Reading

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.

The speaking style is analytical and fact-based, utilizing specific figures and comparisons to back up the arguments. They employ humor and personal anecdotes (referencing Kaia Iva’s mathematician example) to illustrate the dangers inherent in drawing misleading conclusions. The style is straightforward and persuasive, yet not aggressive; rather, it is explanatory and instructive.
2025-05-21
Draft law amending the Income Tax Act (597 SE) - First Reading

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.

Uses a factual and argumentative approach, relying on specific numbers and examples. The style is direct and slightly confrontational, especially when refuting "false claims." It combines technical details with emotional impact, emphasizing the hardships faced by pensioners and using repetition ("not a single cent – not a single cent!").
2025-05-21
Draft law on establishing tax peace (607 SE) – first reading

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.

Uses a factual and explanatory approach, relying on data and international comparisons. They honestly admit when they don't have the necessary data on hand, but they aren't embarrassed by this. The style is professional and measured, utilizing specific examples and statistics to substantiate their positions.
2025-05-14
First reading of the draft resolution of the Riigikogu "Proposal to the Republic of Estonia’s Government to submit a negative supplementary budget bill to reduce administrative expenses in 2025" (608 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session

It utilizes an official and neutral tone, focusing strictly on facts and procedural aspects. The style of communication is concise and specific, deliberately avoiding emotional expressions. It places strong emphasis on consensus decisions and collective work.
2025-05-07
Second reading of the draft law amending the Electricity Market Act (556 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The speaker employs emotional and persuasive rhetoric, combining humor (a joke about "random energy"), religious references (the Bible), and scientific facts. The style is direct and passionate, drawing a contrast between the "eternity" of solar/wind power and the harmfulness of oil shale. The speech is structured factually but is emotionally charged.
2025-05-06
The Minister of Finance's 2025 presentation on the implementation of the state's long-term strategy "Estonia 2035" (including an overview of the development directions of the public service in 2024)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

Adopts an optimistic and fact-based approach, relying on specific numerical indicators. The rhetoric is formal and analytical, yet it also includes emotional elements such as "taking one's hat off to Estonian companies." It combines technical explanations with colloquialisms and metaphors ("gently embracing the entire Estonian universe").
2025-04-16
Draft Land Tax Act (582 SE) - First Reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session

The speaker employs a formally informative style of expression, relying on facts and data. The tone is more explanatory than emotional, featuring many technical details and statistics. They honestly acknowledge the limits of their knowledge ("I simply don't know that," "I can't answer") and regularly reference expert opinions, which demonstrates a cautious and responsible approach.
2025-04-08
Draft law amending the Securities Market Act and, in consequence thereof, amending other laws (588 SE) - first reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The rhetoric is diplomatic and engaging, utilizing personal assurances ("I, for my part, dare to confirm") and rhetorical questions. The style is formal, yet simultaneously emotionally persuasive, balancing logical arguments with personal experience.
2025-01-22
Draft law amending the Value Added Tax Act (539 SE) - First Reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session.

The speaker employs a factual and analytical approach, relying on data and expert opinions. Their tone is professional and explanatory, utilizing concrete examples and statistics. They honestly acknowledge the limitations of their answers ("I don't have a better answer") and attempt to be constructive, even while firmly adhering to their own viewpoints.
2025-01-22
Continuation of the first reading of the draft law declaring the Motor Vehicle Tax Act invalid (538 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session.

The speaking style is professional and explanatory, focusing on facts and numerical data. The speaker employs logical argumentation, citing specific draft legislation and committee decisions. The style is rather pedagogical—he explains complex tax and budget issues using practical examples. Emotional expressions are used sparingly; the emphasis remains on rational justifications.
2024-12-16
Overview of the Implementation of the Fundamentals of Criminal Policy until 2030

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

The speaker uses a polite and formal tone, starting with an expression of respect ("Honored Chairman! Good presenter!") and thanking the source for the informative data. The style is questioning and constructive, focusing on a specific topic without emotional evaluations.
2024-12-11
Third reading of the draft law on the 2025 state budget (513 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

Uses a fact-based, technically detailed style, relying on figures and statistics. The tone is predominantly explanatory and pedagogical, but becomes more emotional when discussing support for Ukraine and national defense. It references personal experiences (grandmother, life on Kihnu) to introduce human examples, but generally maintains a formal approach.
2024-12-11
Draft law amending the Alcohol, Tobacco, Fuel and Electricity Excise Tax Act and other laws (510 SE) - Third Reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

Uses a fact-based and analytical approach, relying on specific numbers and statistics. The tone is calm and explanatory, seeking to persuade through logical arguments. The speech is clearly structured, addressing various aspects sequentially, and concludes with a direct appeal to support the draft bill.
2024-12-04
Second reading of the draft law amending the Alcohol, Tobacco, Fuel and Electricity Excise Tax Act and other laws (510 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting

It utilizes a balanced and analytical approach, acknowledging the arguments of various parties (health promoters versus economic considerations). It relies on facts and figures but also employs figurative expressions, such as "keeta katla ühes servas paksemat suppi" (to boil thicker soup on one side of the cauldron). The tone is calm and explanatory, not confrontational.
2024-12-04
Draft law amending the 2024 State Budget Act (517 SE) – third reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting

They utilize an explanatory and pedagogical approach, acknowledging their fast speaking pace and adjusting it based on the listeners' needs. They rely on facts and specific figures, avoiding emotional rhetoric. The communication style is direct and practical, utilizing simple examples to clarify complex concepts. They demonstrate self-reflection and a willingness to improve their presentation style.
2024-11-21
Second reading of the bill amending the Income Tax Act and the Defence Service Act, and the bill amending the Income Tax Act (509 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

Employs an explanatory and detailed style, presenting fact-based arguments. Honestly acknowledges the difficulties of political decisions ("it would be honest if such a tax hump didn't exist at all"). Maintains a neutral tone even when offering critical assessments, using short, concrete answers ("Bad, bad").
2024-11-13
Second reading of the draft law on the 2025 state budget (513 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.

They employ a detailed, explanatory style, grounding their arguments in figures and facts. They can be emotional at times, particularly when discussing security and discrimination, often drawing on personal anecdotes. While they tend to react defensively to criticism, they do recognize constructive suggestions from the opposition. They utilize metaphors (such as "a dog without a home" or "a house of cards") to clarify complex subjects.
2024-11-13
Draft law amending the 2024 State Budget Act (517 SE) – Second Reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.

The speaker uses a formal, technocratic style, which is more didactic than emotional. They rely on facts and legislation but also include ironic remarks ("the basic budget law is, of course, your bible"). The tone is authoritative and occasionally paternalistic, particularly toward the opposition. Lengthy explanations are avoided, considering the late hour.
2024-11-13
Draft law amending the State Budget Act (511 SE) - Second Reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.

The speaker employs a fact-based, analytical approach, drawing on historical examples and specific data. The style is explanatory and pedagogical, though it also incorporates a critical tone directed at opponents. They utilize structured argumentation and clarification of terminology to substantiate their positions.
2024-10-16
Draft law on the 2025 state budget (513 SE) - first reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The tone used is calm and explanatory, grounded in facts and numerical data. It employs metaphors ("large ships are turned slowly") and structured argumentation. The style is formal and comprehensive, prioritizing the delivery of detailed explanations over emotional appeal.
2024-10-15
First reading of the draft law amending the Income Tax Act and the Defence Service Act, and the draft law amending the Income Tax Act (509 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session

Employs a formal, factual, and neutral tone. Focuses on data and procedural issues rather than emotional appeals. The style of discourse is explanatory, relying on specific figures and legislative details.
2024-10-15
Draft law amending the 2024 State Budget Act (517 SE) – first reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session

It employs a formal and technical style, focusing on facts and procedural explanations. The tone is calm and constructive, avoiding emotional expressions. It honestly acknowledges the limits of its knowledge and promises supplementary information, which demonstrates a professional approach. Frequent use of quoting from memory indicates a deep engagement with the subject matter.
2024-09-25
Draft law amending the Income Tax Act and the Defence Service Act (432 SE) – First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session

The style of discourse is formal and fact-based, focusing on procedural matters and the clarification of technical details. Direct, bureaucratic language is employed, devoid of emotional expression. The emphasis is placed on accuracy and the correction of facts.
2024-07-29
Second Reading of the Motor Vehicle Tax Bill (364 UA)

15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu

Employs a formal and explanatory style, relying on facts and numerical data. Provides detailed and technical answers to questions, using specific examples and references to legislation. Maintains a calm and professional tone even when faced with critical questions, occasionally acknowledging the limits of knowledge ("I cannot say").
2024-07-15
Reconsideration of the Motor Vehicle Tax Act (364 UA) left unpromulgated by the President of the Republic

15th Riigikogu, Extraordinary session of the Riigikogu

The speaker employs a formally informative style of communication, relying on facts and detailed explanations. Their approach is conciliatory and analytical, strictly avoiding emotional assessments. They structure their presentation logically, utilizing numerical references and chronological sequencing, and openly acknowledge the boundaries of their expertise regarding specific questions.
2024-06-19
Third Reading of the Draft Law on the State Supplementary Budget for 2024 (Bill 456 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, extra plenary sitting

Employs a factual and technically precise style, relying on concrete figures and legal arguments. Uses practical examples (e.g., a caregiver's salary of 1200 euros) to clarify complex tax issues. Maintains a formal tone, but also permits personal commentary (regarding working hours) and provides direct responses to criticism. Balances technical explanations with political viewpoints.
2024-06-14
Second Reading of the Draft State Supplementary Budget Act for 2024 (456 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, additional plenary session

The approach is factual and technocratic, relying heavily on specific figures and legal arguments. The style is formal and explanatory, aiming to educate and convince through logical reasoning. They occasionally become defensive, particularly when addressing criticism concerning transferable funds or processing timelines. They utilize comparisons (for instance, with personal or household budgets) and practical examples to clarify their positions.
2024-06-13
Financial Supervision Authority 2023 Annual Report

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session

Employs a polite and formal tone ("Thank you very much, dear manager! Esteemed presenter"), but simultaneously poses sharp and specific questions. Relies on facts and numerical comparisons, using logical argumentation devoid of emotional expressions.
2024-06-12
Second reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Land Tax Act (437 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.

The statement is supportive and clarifying, not confrontational. The speaker acknowledges their error and corrects themselves publicly ("Sorry!"), which demonstrates an honest and humble approach. The style is rather technical and fact-based.
2024-06-12
Third Reading of the Motor Vehicle Tax Bill (364 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.

They use an explanatory and argumentative style, balancing emotional and logical arguments. They honestly acknowledge the unpopularity of tax increases but rationally justify them based on the needs of the state. They use concrete examples and factual data, publicly correcting their previous claims and clarifying erroneous interpretations.
2024-06-10
First Reading of the Draft Act on the 2024 Supplementary Budget (456 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

It employs an official, fact-based, and neutral tone, focusing primarily on logical arguments and concrete figures. The style of discourse is concise and structured, and emotional appeals are absent. Information is presented objectively, highlighting the viewpoints of various parties.
2024-06-05
Second reading of the Motor Vehicle Tax Bill (364 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

Uses a detailed, technically precise style, combining fact-based explanations with personal examples (Land Rover Defender on Kihnu, millionaire media personality). Maintains a predominantly calm, explanatory tone, but occasionally becomes defensive when criticized. The approach is rather pedagogical, attempting to explain complex tax topics simply.
2024-06-04
First reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Appointment of a Member of the Council of the Bank of Estonia from among the Members of the Riigikogu" (445 OE)

15th Riigikogu, third session, plenary sitting

The tone is official, neutral, and fact-based, focusing on procedural information. It utilizes a clear, structured presentation devoid of emotional or persuasive elements, strictly adhering to the formal parliamentary style.
2024-06-04
First Reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Appointment of a Member of the Council of the Bank of Estonia from among the Members of the Riigikogu" (446 OE)

15th Riigikogu, third session, plenary sitting

An official and neutral tone, consistent with the formality of parliamentary procedure. Employs a clear, factual presentation style, devoid of emotional or persuasive elements. The discourse is structured and sequential, focusing on procedural steps and legal requirements.
2024-05-30
Discussion of the nationally important issue: "How can the state avoid living in debt?"

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting

The speaking style is academic and analytical, relying heavily on facts and numerical data. The tone is moderately cautionary, using historical examples and comparisons with other countries to reinforce the arguments. The speaker employs an explanatory approach, attempting to simplify complex economic relationships, including references to their teaching experience.
2024-05-29
First reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic for Lowering the Value-Added Tax on Domestic Fruits and Vegetables to 5 Percent" (406 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The speaker employs a formal and precise style, concentrating on procedural matters. The tone is official and explanatory, devoid of emotional or rhetorical flourishes, relying solely on facts and the authority vested in their position.
2024-05-29
Third Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the 2024 State Budget Act (389 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

It employs an official and fact-based style, relying on specific figures and legal citations. The tone is calm and explanatory, focusing on the communication of technical details. Responses to questions are brief and direct, avoiding lengthy explanations or emotional expressions.
2024-05-14
First Reading of the Draft Basic Education Act (419 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

A polite and formal approach, utilizing traditional parliamentary forms of address ("Mr./Madam Speaker," "Honorable Minister"). The style is inquisitive and information-seeking, rather than confrontational.
2024-05-13
Proposal by the Chancellor of Justice for bringing the Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Prevention Act, the Credit Institutions Act, the Law of Obligations Act, and the State Fees Act into conformity with the Constitution

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session

Uses a formal yet accessible style, starting with polite greetings. It relies on facts and concrete examples, referencing commission discussions and expert standpoints. The style is informative and structured, focusing on explaining the problem and offering solutions without emotional judgments.
2024-05-08
The 2024 Report by the Minister of Finance on the implementation of the state's long-term development strategy "Eesti 2035" (including an overview of public service development trends in 2022 and 2023)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session.

Adopts an inquisitive and reflective approach, posing rhetorical questions sequentially. The style is polite, yet critical, focusing on procedural and customary aspects. The tone is more concerned than aggressive.
2024-05-07
Second Reading of the Draft Act Amending the 2024 State Budget Act (389 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

It utilizes an official and fact-based approach, relying on specific figures and legislative procedures. The second address is explanatory and educational, focusing on clarifying a technical issue (tax lease) for colleagues. The style is neutral and highly informative.
2024-05-02
First Reading of the Riigikogu Draft Statement (420 AE) "On Declaring the Moscow Patriarchate an Institution Supporting the Military Aggression of the Russian Federation"

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The tone is emotional and personal, employing powerful imagery ("sowing suffering, death, and destruction with his bombs"). The style merges religious pathos with a political message, highlighting the speaker's personal connection to the subject matter. It becomes pragmatic towards the end, urging swift action.
2024-05-02
Continuation of the first reading of the Bill on the Tax on Sweetened Beverages (418 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

Employs an official, factual, and neutral tone, focusing on information and procedural details. The style is concise and structured, avoiding emotional evaluations or rhetorical devices.
2024-04-03
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the 2024 State Budget Act (389 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The speaking style is formal, fact-based, and structured. The speaker employs clear, bureaucratic language, focusing on procedural details and specific examples. Emotional appeals are absent; the emphasis is placed on logical arguments and the presentation of facts.
2024-04-03
Second Reading of the Bill for the Amendment of the Income Tax Act (337 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session

It utilizes a clear, fact-based, and neutral presentation style, focusing on the precise explanation of technical details. It openly acknowledges the draft's "awkwardness" concerning its retroactive entry into force, but emphasizes its positive impact on people. The tone is professional and highly informative.
2024-04-03
Second reading of the Draft Act on the Amendment of the Law on Exchange of Tax Information, the Taxation Procedure Act, and the Income Tax Act (379 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session

It employs an official, factual, and neutral tone. The discourse is structured and logical, focusing on data and procedural details. Emotional appeals are absent; the emphasis is placed on the clear and precise conveyance of information and the description of the legislative process.
2024-03-19
First Reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic to Lower the VAT Rate on Cancer Medicines" (277 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

A formal and neutral style, focusing on the delivery of facts and procedural information. The address is brief, specific, and emotionally reserved, strictly adhering to parliamentary etiquette.
2024-03-13
First Reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic to Lower the Value Added Tax on Foodstuffs and Medicines to 5 Percent" (272 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting.

The text employs a factual and analytical approach, drawing upon specific examples and data. The tone is calm and explanatory, avoiding emotional language. It emphasizes logical connections and cause-and-effect relationships within the field of tax policy.
2024-03-12
First Reading of the Draft Act amending the State Budget Act (391 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd plenary sitting

The style of discourse is formal, structured, and explanatory, focusing on facts and procedures. It employs logical argumentation, sequentially presenting the substance and rationale behind the legal amendments. The style is cooperative and consensus-driven, emphasizing the identification of compromises and the lengthy consultation process. Emotional elements are absent; technical and legal discourse dominates.
2024-03-07
Debate on the matter of national importance, "The Future of Estonian Energy 2035," initiated by the Estonian Reform Party parliamentary group.

Fifteenth Riigikogu, third sitting, plenary session

It employs an analytical approach presented in the form of questions, which is both courteous and constructive. It begins with an expression of gratitude ("Thank you very much") and utilizes formal language ("Esteemed Chairman"). It relies on facts and comparisons, presenting complex economic questions in a structured manner.
2024-03-05
2024 Report by the Minister of Education and Research on the Implementation of the State's Long-Term Development Strategy "Eesti 2035" (Education Reforms)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The tone used is polite yet critical, beginning with expressions of gratitude and proceeding with constructive inquiries. It combines fact-based arguments with emotional resonance, highlighting the importance of equal treatment for all taxpayers. Specific examples and data are favored over general claims, and questions are framed to imply fault rather than launch an outright attack.
2024-02-21
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Value Added Tax Act (286 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

It employs a fact-based and analytical approach, relying on concrete figures and summaries of commission discussions. The style is formal and neutral, focusing on procedural aspects and expert viewpoints, while avoiding emotional rhetoric.
2024-02-14
First Reading of the Motor Vehicle Tax Bill (364 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

They employ an evidence-based and argumentative approach, relying on specific examples and personal experiences. The style is explanatory and persuasive, utilizing both emotional (children and strollers) and rational arguments. It integrates personal anecdotes (a businessman's appeal to them) with general political principles.
2024-02-07
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Value-Added Tax Act (264 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting.

The speaker employs a very laconic and formal style, focusing exclusively on procedural facts. The rhetoric is neutral and emotionless, without any attempts at persuasion or detailed explanations.
2024-02-07
First Reading of the Bill to Amend the Income Tax Act (230 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting.

It utilizes an official, neutral, and factual style. The presentation is structured and procedure-centric, focusing on the objective coverage of the commission's work, without emotional or personal assessments.
2024-02-07
First Reading of the Bill (217 SE) to Amend the Income Tax Act

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting.

It employs an official, fact-based, and emotionally neutral style. The discourse is structured chronologically, focusing on specific facts and procedure. Evaluative statements are avoided, prioritizing objective reporting regarding the commission's workflow and decisions.
2024-02-07
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Income Tax Act (182 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting.

A formal and concise style, employing parliamentary courtesy ('Esteemed Speaker,' 'Dear colleagues') and direct argumentation, without emotional or complicated explanations.
2024-02-07
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Income Tax Act (177 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting.

It utilizes a formal, fact-based, and neutral tone. The style of discourse features a clearly structured composition, focusing on procedural details and concrete facts instead of emotional appeals.
2024-02-06
First reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Recall of a Member of the Riigikogu from the Bank of Estonia Supervisory Board and Appointment of a New Member" (366 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

A formal and polite style, featuring traditional parliamentary addresses ("Honorable Speaker! Dear colleagues!"). The tone of speech is neutral and objective, focusing on the presentation of facts without emotional evaluations. It uses clear and direct language.
2024-01-24
First Reading of the Bill on Amendments to the Income Tax Act (248 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The speech was formal and adhered strictly to protocol, utilizing traditional expressions of courtesy ("Honored Chairman! Dear colleagues!"). The style was brief and specific, focusing on the factual announcement, devoid of any emotional or persuasive elements.
2024-01-24
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Income Tax Act (219 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The Speaker employed a formal and laconic style, adhering to parliamentary etiquette with polite addresses. The speech itself was very short and to the point, focusing solely on the important decision without further explanation.
2024-01-24
First Reading of the Bill to Amend the Income Tax Act (197 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The speaking style was extremely laconic and direct, utilizing a formal manner of address and short, clear sentences. Emotional or persuasive arguments were absent, focusing solely on the specific demand.
2024-01-24
First reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Income Tax Act (Bill 186 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The address is formal and strictly courteous, adhering to protocol, utilizing the traditional salutations "Honored Chair! Dear colleagues!". The style is brief, specific, and straightforward, without emotional or persuasive elements.
2024-01-24
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Income Tax Act (Bill 180 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

A very brief and formal style, utilizing standard parliamentary addresses ("Honorable Deputy Speaker! Dear colleagues!") and concluding with a courtesy phrase.
2024-01-24
First Reading of the Bill for the Amendment of the Income Tax Act (179 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The speech was highly laconic and formal, utilizing the standard boilerplate language of a parliamentary address. The style was neutral and emotionless, focusing solely on the communication of the decision.
2024-01-24
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Income Tax Act (Bill 154 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The speaker employed an extremely laconic and formal style, confining themselves to polite formalities and the core message. Emotional or persuasive elements were completely absent.
2024-01-24
First Reading of the Draft Act amending the Income Tax Act (152 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The address was extremely laconic and official, focusing solely on essential information without further clarification or emotional expression. The style was direct and formal.
2024-01-24
First Reading of the Bill on Amendments to the Income Tax Act (125 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The speech was extremely brief and formal, utilizing the traditional structure of a parliamentary address, complete with polite salutations. The style was direct and effective, without unnecessary elaboration.
2024-01-24
First Reading of the Bill Amending the Income Tax Act (120 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The speaker adopted an extremely laconic and formal style, confining himself to standard courtesies and a brief factual announcement. Emotional or persuasive elements were entirely absent.
2024-01-24
First Reading of the Bill to Amend the Income Tax Act (117 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The tone utilized is formal, fact-based, and neutral. The communication is structured and procedure-centric, focusing on the description of procedural steps, devoid of emotional or personal assessments. The presentation style is concise and specific.
2024-01-24
First reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Alcohol, Tobacco, Fuel, and Electricity Excise Duty Act (255 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The address was extremely concise and formal, focusing solely on essential information and devoid of emotional or persuasive elements. Formal parliamentary language and expressions of courtesy were employed.
2024-01-24
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Alcohol, Tobacco, Fuel, and Electricity Excise Duty Act (237 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The speaker employed an extremely laconic and formal style, confining themselves only to the necessary facts. The tone was neutral and strictly procedural, devoid of any emotional or persuasive elements.
2024-01-24
First reading of the Draft Act amending the Alcohol, Tobacco, Fuel, and Electricity Excise Tax Act (Bill 202 SE).

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The address was extremely concise and formal, focusing solely on essential information and devoid of emotional or persuasive elements. Standard parliamentary formulaic language was employed.
2024-01-24
First reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Alcohol, Tobacco, Fuel, and Electricity Excise Duty Act (Bill 185 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The speech was extremely brief and formal, strictly adhering to parliamentary protocol. The style was neutral and factual, devoid of any emotional or persuasive elements.
2024-01-24
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Alcohol, Tobacco, Fuel, and Electricity Excise Duty Act (170 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The address was extremely brief and formal, employing standard parliamentary language ("Honorable Speaker! Dear colleagues!"). The style was direct and unemotional, focusing solely on the factual announcement without any further explanation.
2024-01-24
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Alcohol, Tobacco, Fuel, and Electricity Excise Duty Act (129 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The statement was extremely brief and formal, utilizing standard parliamentary boilerplate language. The tone was neutral and businesslike, devoid of any emotional or persuasive elements.
2024-01-24
First reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Alcohol, Tobacco, Fuel, and Electricity Excise Duty Act (Bill 126 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The speech was extremely concise and formal, employing standard parliamentary address forms ("Mr./Madam Speaker! Esteemed colleagues!"). The style was straightforward and effective, focusing solely on the core message, without any supplementary remarks.
2024-01-24
First Reading of the Draft Act Amending the Alcohol, Tobacco, Fuel, and Electricity Excise Duty Act (Bill 123 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The address was extremely brief and formal, strictly adhering to parliamentary protocol. Polite forms of address were employed ("Honorable Chair! Dear colleagues!") and the tone remained neutral, devoid of any emotional or persuasive elements.
2024-01-24
First Reading of the Draft Act amending the Alcohol, Tobacco, Fuel, and Electricity Excise Duty Act (Bill 119 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The tone of the speech is formal and strictly courteous, adhering to protocol, utilizing the standard parliamentary opening: "Esteemed Speaker! Dear colleagues!" The statement itself is brief, concrete, and straightforward, devoid of any emotional or rhetorical flourishes.
2024-01-24
First Reading of the Bill to Amend the Alcohol, Tobacco, Fuel, and Electricity Excise Duty Act (111 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

It utilizes an official, protocol-driven style, devoid of emotional or personal judgments. The discourse is structured and fact-based, concentrating on the precise description of procedural steps.
2024-01-18
Debate on the National Issue of Crucial Importance: "Strong Rural Schools and a Strong School Network"

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The tone is polite and collegial, beginning with expressions of gratitude and emphasizing personal connections. At the same time, the question is direct and challenging, contrasting two different approaches to reforming the education network.
2024-01-17
First Reading of the Bill amending the Income Tax Act (254 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The tone of voice is brief and professional, using polite forms of address ("Dear colleagues!") but maintaining an official distance. The style is straightforward and bureaucratic, focusing on procedure.
2024-01-17
First Reading of the Bill for the Amendment of the Income Tax Act (252 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The speech is formal and concise, utilizing the standard parliamentary address format. The style is neutral and procedure-focused, devoid of emotional or persuasive elements.
2024-01-17
Draft Act on Amendments to the Income Tax Act (211 SE), First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The speech is formal and brief, utilizing a formal parliamentary speech structure. The style is direct and businesslike, devoid of emotional or persuasive elements.
2024-01-17
First Reading of the Bill for the Amendment of the Income Tax Act (201 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

Insufficient data
2024-01-17
First Reading of the Draft Act Amending the Income Tax Act (200 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The tone is formal and concise, utilizing the standard parliamentary address formula, "Dear colleagues!" The style is factual and unemotional, focusing on procedure.
2024-01-17
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Income Tax Act (Bill 172 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The speaking style is direct and critical, incorporating a touch of irony ("I don't know which economics textbook the waitress has read"). The speaker employs clear, concrete assertions and relies on facts, steering clear of emotional appeals. The tone is formal, yet simultaneously forceful and persuasive.
2024-01-17
First Reading of the Bill for the Amendment of the Income Tax Act (134 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The speaker employs straightforward and fact-based rhetoric, starting with an address to colleagues. The style is explanatory and instructive, emphasizing the necessity of conveying accurate information. The tone is formal, but not hostile.
2024-01-17
First Reading of the Bill for the Amendment of the Income Tax Act (131 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The speech is formal and concise, utilizing standard parliamentary language. The style is neutral and procedure-focused, devoid of emotional or persuasive elements.
2024-01-17
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Income Tax Act (113 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The speaking style was polite and formal, utilizing traditional parliamentary addresses ("Dear colleagues," "Mr./Madam Speaker"). The wording was diplomatic, yet simultaneously decisive, avoiding a confrontational tone.
2024-01-17
First Reading of the Bill on Amendments to the Income Tax Act (109 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The address is formal and concise, utilizing the standard parliamentary speech format. The style is neutral and procedural, focusing on conveying the decision of the Finance Committee without emotional or persuasive elements.
2024-01-17
First Reading of the Bill to Amend the Income Tax Act (107 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

A formal and concise style, focusing strictly on conveying facts, devoid of emotional or persuasive elements. It employs a direct, structured approach, openly acknowledging the brevity of the presentation.
2024-01-17
First Reading of the Bill to Amend the Income Tax Act (249 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The address was formal and concise, utilizing standard parliamentary language. The tone was neutral and businesslike, focusing on conveying the committee's decision without any emotional or persuasive elements.
2024-01-17
First Reading of the Bill on Amendments to the Income Tax Act (247 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The address is brief, formal, and straightforward. It uses the formal salutation "Dear colleagues" and conveys the decision of the Finance Committee in a neutral, bureaucratic tone, without emotional or persuasive elements.
2024-01-17
First Reading of the Bill for the Amendment of the Income Tax Act (242 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

It employs a concise, factual, and direct style. The tone is formal and neutral, focusing on facts without emotional or rhetorical devices.
2024-01-17
First reading of the Bill amending the Income Tax Act (235 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The speaker employs a formal, neutral tone, focusing on the delivery of facts without emotional judgments. The style is concise and direct, emphasizing their role as a representative of the commission.
2024-01-17
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Income Tax Act (Bill 234 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The speech is formal and concise, utilizing the standard format of a parliamentary address. The style is neutral and businesslike, focusing solely on conveying the decision without any emotional or persuasive elements.
2024-01-17
First reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Income Tax Act (Bill 233 SE).

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The tone is brief, direct, and formal. The speaker employs irony, referring to the EKRE bill as "very generous," yet maintains a professional distance. Emotional elements are minimal; the focus is on factual reporting.
2024-01-17
First reading of the Bill for the Amendment of the Income Tax Act (198 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The speech is formal and concise, using standard parliamentary language. The tone is neutral and businesslike, focusing on the procedure without emotional or persuasive elements.
2024-01-17
Draft Act Amending the Income Tax Act (195 SE), First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The tone is formal and brief, using the formal address "Dear colleagues!" and focusing directly on the commission's recommendation without further explanation.
2024-01-17
First reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Income Tax Act (187 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The address was exceptionally laconic and formal, focusing solely on the essential fact without further explanations or emotional appeals. The style was direct and bureaucratic.
2024-01-17
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Income Tax Act (Bill 183 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

An official and concise style, focusing on facts and procedural aspects. It employs direct and clear language, devoid of emotional or persuasive elements, strictly adhering to parliamentary etiquette.
2024-01-17
First Reading of the Bill on Amendments to the Income Tax Act (178 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

A very brief and formal address, directed at colleagues, was delivered politely yet concisely. A formal tone was employed, devoid of emotional or logical arguments, focusing solely on the factual announcement.
2024-01-17
First reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Income Tax Act (153 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

There is not enough data.
2024-01-17
First Reading of the Bill on Amendments to the Income Tax Act (128 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The speech was extremely laconic and official, focusing solely on essential information, devoid of emotional or persuasive elements. The style was direct and formal.
2024-01-17
First Reading of the Draft Act Amending the Income Tax Act (122 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The speaker employs an extremely laconic and formal style, confining themselves strictly to necessary procedural announcements, without offering any further explanations or emotional expressions.
2024-01-17
Draft Bill Amending the Income Tax Act (118 SE), First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The speaking style was laconic and formal, focusing strictly on facts and devoid of any emotional or persuasive elements. The first address was extremely brief and direct, while the second was more explanatory and information-oriented.
2024-01-17
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Income Tax Act (Bill 115 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The speech is extremely laconic and formal, focusing solely on essential information. The style is neutral and procedural, devoid of emotional or persuasive elements.
2024-01-17
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Income Tax Act (114 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The address was extremely brief and formal, focusing solely on the essential information, without any emotional or persuasive elements. The tone was neutral and strictly adhered to protocol.
2024-01-17
First Reading of the Bill to Amend the Income Tax Act (103 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

A very brief and formal style, utilizing polite forms of address ("Dear colleagues") and expressions of gratitude. The speech is fact-based, without emotional or persuasive elements.
2024-01-17
First Reading of the Bill on Amendments to the Income Tax Act (102 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The speaker adopts an apologetic and practical tone, starting with an apology for the delay and an explanation for the haste. The style is formal yet friendly, focusing on procedural aspects and concluding with a note of thanks. The speech is short and businesslike, devoid of emotional or ideological emphasis.
2024-01-10
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Value-Added Tax Act (250 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The speaker employed a highly concise and matter-of-fact style, focusing solely on delivering facts without any emotional or persuasive elements. The tone was formal and neutral, characterized by the use of simple sentence structures.
2024-01-10
First Reading of the Bill on Amendments to the Value Added Tax Act (245 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The statement was extremely laconic and formal, focusing only on essential information without additional explanations or emotional expression. The tone was neutral and strictly adhering to protocol.
2024-01-10
First Reading of the Draft Act amending the Value Added Tax Act (Bill 241 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

A very short and factual statement that focuses solely on essential information, without emotional or rhetorical elements. The style is formal and direct.
2024-01-10
First Reading of the Bill on Amendments to the Value-Added Tax Act (240 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

A very brief and direct statement, focusing solely on essential information without further explanations. The tone is formal and neutral.
2024-01-10
First reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Value Added Tax Act (Bill 239 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The tone of voice is brief, direct, and slightly ironically critical. The speaker employs a professional, yet not excessively formal style, concluding with the personal remark, "That is all from my side," which underscores the finality of their position.
2024-01-10
Draft Act on Amendments to the Value Added Tax Act (Bill 238 SE), First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The address was extremely laconic and official, focusing solely on essential information, devoid of any emotional or persuasive elements. The style was formal and direct.
2024-01-10
First Reading of the Draft Act Amending the Value-Added Tax Act (Bill 236 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The speech is extremely laconic and formal, focusing only on the essential fact without additional explanations or emotional expression. The style is direct and bureaucratic.
2024-01-10
First reading of the Bill on Amendments to the Value Added Tax Act (220 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

Employs a factual, neutral, and official tone. Speaks briefly and concretely, focusing on procedural aspects without emotional assessments. The second sentence is very short and direct.
2024-01-10
First Reading of the Bill to Amend the Value-Added Tax Act (196 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

A very laconic and formal style, focusing on the delivery of facts without emotional or persuasive elements. It uses formal parliamentary language.
2024-01-10
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Value Added Tax Act (193 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

Uses a formal and focused style. Addresses colleagues courteously and presents the viewpoint directly and clearly, without extensive argumentation.
2024-01-10
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Value Added Tax Act (184 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

Employs factual and defensive rhetoric, rejecting accusations (e.g., "I must apparently reject the accusation of lying"). Arguments are substantiated using specific data and legal grounds. The style is formal and direct, focusing on the presentation of technical facts.
2024-01-10
First reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Value Added Tax Act (169 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The speaker employs a concise, businesslike, and formal style. The tone is neutral and factual, focusing on the commission's decision and procedural aspects, and is devoid of emotional or persuasive elements.
2024-01-10
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Value Added Tax Act (149 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

It uses a concise, straightforward, and factual style of communication. The tone is humble and honest—it openly acknowledges gaps in its knowledge. Emotional arguments are avoided, focusing instead on technical aspects.
2024-01-10
First reading of the Draft Act amending the Value-Added Tax Act (Bill 132 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

A very brief and formal style, employing the standard parliamentary greeting ("Dear colleagues!") and laconically conveying the committee's decision without additional explanations.
2024-01-10
First Reading of the Bill on Amendments to the Value-Added Tax Act (108 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The manner of discourse is formal and concise, focusing on the transmission of facts without the use of emotional or rhetorical devices. The style is procedural and neutral, strictly adhering to the required procedural format.
2024-01-10
First Reading of the Draft Act amending the Value Added Tax Act (87 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The speaker employs a neutral, official tone, concentrating on presenting facts and procedural steps. The style is laconic and unemotional, emphasizing technical aspects rather than political arguments.