By Agendas: Annely Akkermann

Total Agendas: 142

Fully Profiled: 142

All Categories Political Position Topic Expertise Rhetorical Style Activity Patterns Opposition Stance Collaboration Style Regional Focus Economic Views Social Issues Legislative Focus
2025-10-13
First Reading of the Draft Act on the 2025 State Supplementary Budget (733 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The speaker himself does not express opposition or criticize anyone, but merely reports on issues raised by others (e.g., Aivar Sõerd). It is only mentioned that one committee member voted against concluding the first reading.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-10-09
First Reading of the Bill on Amendments to the Motor Vehicle Tax Act (625 SE)

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The opposition is directed at the initiators of the draft bill and their arguments, focusing on the political and legal flaws (unconstitutionality, the impossibility of merging registers). The criticism is specific and policy-driven, rejecting proposals to discuss alternatives since the government has already offered a constitutional alternative.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-10-09
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Value-Added Tax Act (661 SE)

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The primary criticism is directed at opponents who fail to grasp the structure of the state budget and the purpose of the loan, accusing them of not even reading the budget's first page. The Social Democrats are separately criticized for inappropriate actions (specifically, conducting VAT calculations within the Ministry of Agriculture), with emphasis placed on this being an unacceptable procedural error.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-10-08
Continuation of the first reading of the Draft Law on the State Budget for 2026 (737 SE)

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

Criticism is aimed at Isamaa's budget philosophy ("lower revenues and raise expenditures") and the previous EKREIKE government regarding the large deficit (5.2% of GDP). It rejects the opposition's (Urmas Reinsalu) repeated attempts to debate "governance costs," arguing that no such line item exists in the budget, and criticizes their arbitrary definition of the term. The criticism is politically and fiscally justified.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-10-06
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Motor Vehicle Tax Act (Bill 677 SE)

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

No direct political confrontation is voiced, but the speaker defends the necessity of the legislative process and legal discussions against criticism that suggests the process is overly complex or protracted. He/She emphasizes that lawmaking involves various layers of oversight (the Ministry of Finance, Parliament lawyers, the Chancellor of Justice, and the Supreme Court).
View Profile View Agenda
2025-10-06
First reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Motor Vehicle Tax Act (694 SE)

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The confrontation is directed at questions and doubts raised by colleagues (such as Aivar Kokk) concerning the technical clarity of the law and the applicability of the Tax Board's prepayment account. The speaker firmly refutes claims that the coalition is struggling to process the motor vehicle tax drafts, labeling such an understanding as completely wrong.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-11
The Financial Supervision Authority's 2024 Report

15th Riigikogu, 6th plenary sitting

The speaker voiced implicit opposition to the proposal by entrepreneurs and the banking association to merge the Financial Supervision Authority with the Bank of Estonia, critically questioning the feasibility of combining two "organizations of differing natures."
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-04
Chair implementation

15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu

The speeches do not contain direct criticism or confrontation with other politicians or groups. The speaker maintains a cooperative and consensus-oriented stance, emphasizing, for instance, the Finance Committee's unanimous decisions and consensus-based approach.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-19
Draft Law on Annulment of the Motor Vehicle Tax Act (647 SE) - First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

While no direct confrontation is evident, the speaker indirectly criticizes the bill's initiators for failing to show up at the committee meeting to explain their positions. The criticism is procedural rather than substantive.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-18
Draft law (666 SE) for terminating the agreement for the avoidance of double taxation of income tax and the prevention of tax evasion between the Republic of Estonia and the Republic of Belarus - second reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

Not enough data
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-18
Third reading of the draft law on the state's supplementary budget for 2025 (651 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

Sharply criticizes Andrei Korobeinik for resorting to personal attacks, accusing him of spreading false claims regarding the tax system and wage issues. The speaker rejects the Social Democrats' proposed amendments, arguing that they are inappropriate in the context of the supplementary budget. Furthermore, the speaker vehemently opposes claims regarding the failure of the Reform Party's fiscal policy.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-18
Draft law (645 SE) for the third reading amending the Simplified Taxation Act for Entrepreneurial Income, the Income Tax Act, and declaring the Security Levy Act invalid.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

Directly criticizing Mr. Reinsalu, Mr. Laats, and Mr. Läänemets, accusing them of addressing the wrong issue. The speaker particularly sharply attacks Isamaa’s tax wedge, calling it a "truly great burden" on taxpayers. The criticism is primarily policy-focused, not personal.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-11
Second reading of the draft law on the state's supplementary budget for 2025 (651 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

Rejects Isamaa’s repeated amendments, citing formal non-compliance with requirements. It opposes the Social Democrats' proposals to raise the subsistence level and abolish kindergarten fees, justifying this stance with fiscal policy considerations. The criticism is primarily procedural and policy-focused, not personal.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-10
The Chairman of the Supreme Court’s overview of court orders, the administration of justice, and the uniform application of laws.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.

No direct opposition is voiced, but a critical attitude towards the widespread use of the epithet "unconstitutional" is noticeable. It expresses cautious concern regarding the similarity between digital businesses and traditional investment firms.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-09
Draft law (666 SE) for terminating the agreement between the Republic of Estonia and the Republic of Belarus for the avoidance of double taxation of income and the prevention of tax evasion – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

Insufficient data
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-22
Draft law amending the Value Added Tax Act (596 SE) – First Reading

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.

The speaker criticizes the supporters of the draft legislation, particularly Rain Epler, but approaches the critique in a well-reasoned and substantive manner. He challenges the claims that lowering the VAT would benefit low-income earners, backing his arguments with mathematical evidence and comparative data. The criticism is based on principle and policy, not personal attacks.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-21
Draft law amending the Income Tax Act (597 SE) - First Reading

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.

Sharply criticizes Isamaa's tax policy, accusing them of worsening the situation for pensioners through the implementation of the tax hump. Categorically rejects Siim Pohlak's assertions, labeling them as "false claims." The opposition is clearly politically motivated and directed against specific political parties.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-21
Draft law on establishing tax peace (607 SE) – first reading

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.

It does not express direct criticism towards specific individuals or groups. Instead, it focuses on justifying political decisions and refuting counterarguments. It mentions that the government does not support the draft bill, and the majority of the committee voted in favor of rejecting it.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-14
First reading of the draft resolution of the Riigikogu "Proposal to the Republic of Estonia’s Government to submit a negative supplementary budget bill to reduce administrative expenses in 2025" (608 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session

Not enough data.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-07
Second reading of the draft law amending the Electricity Market Act (556 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The speaker indirectly criticizes the national-conservative party, hinting that they should better understand religious values. He/She opposes the proponents of oil shale energy who, in his/her opinion, ignore environmental damage and present oil shale as a "free" alternative. The criticism is primarily political in nature.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-06
The Minister of Finance's 2025 presentation on the implementation of the state's long-term strategy "Estonia 2035" (including an overview of the development directions of the public service in 2024)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

He directly criticizes the claims made by his colleague Urmas Reinsalu concerning the decline in residents' well-being, labeling them "base political rhetoric" and offering specific numerical data as counter-evidence. He also criticizes the simultaneous application of two corporate income tax systems, describing the situation as "very strange."
View Profile View Agenda
2025-04-16
Draft Land Tax Act (582 SE) - First Reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session

The speaker clearly opposes the bill initiated by the Isamaa faction, but does so primarily through political and factual arguments, rather than resorting to personal attacks. They emphasize that the government does not support the bill and that its reversal is not justified. The criticism is moderate and well-reasoned, rather than sharp or emotional.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-04-08
Draft law amending the Securities Market Act and, in consequence thereof, amending other laws (588 SE) - first reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The speaker does not express direct opposition to specific individuals or groups, but rather focuses on addressing systemic problems in the area of gender inequality.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-01-22
Draft law amending the Value Added Tax Act (539 SE) - First Reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session.

The speaker clearly opposes the bill initiated by EKRE, relying primarily on economic and political arguments. Their criticism is factual and procedural, rather than personal, focusing on the bill's shortcomings, such as the lack of alternative funding and inefficiency in assisting target groups.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-01-22
Continuation of the first reading of the draft law declaring the Motor Vehicle Tax Act invalid (538 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session.

The speaker criticizes the low attendance of EKRE members at the Finance Committee meetings, noting that they "very rarely attend" them. He also expresses general criticism towards coalitions where "individuals want to be more Catholic than the Pope himself" and then "shirk responsibility for the party's decisions." The criticism is procedural rather than personal, focusing on the organization of work.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-12-16
Overview of the Implementation of the Fundamentals of Criminal Policy until 2030

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

There is not enough data.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-12-11
Third reading of the draft law on the 2025 state budget (513 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

Critiques the formal deficiencies in the Isamaa faction's proposed amendments, stating they do not comply with the requirements of the Rules of Procedure and Internal Rules Act. Makes an ironic remark directed at Urmas Reinsalu, suggesting he should learn how to draft amendments from the Centre Party. Overall, the tone remains constructive, focusing on procedural matters.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-12-11
Draft law amending the Alcohol, Tobacco, Fuel and Electricity Excise Tax Act and other laws (510 SE) - Third Reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

No direct opposition or criticism is voiced. They neutrally reference the calculations made by colleague Anti Haugas concerning the decrease in alcohol prices. They demonstrate a rather cooperative attitude, acknowledging the differing viewpoints within the Finance Committee.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-12-04
Second reading of the draft law amending the Alcohol, Tobacco, Fuel and Electricity Excise Tax Act and other laws (510 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting

It does not express direct confrontation; instead, it balances various viewpoints. It acknowledges the legitimate concerns of health advocates but counters them with economic arguments. The approach is diplomatic, not confrontational.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-12-04
Draft law amending the 2024 State Budget Act (517 SE) – third reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting

Criticizes the Isamaa faction's amendments as technically flawed and formally non-compliant. The opposition is primarily procedural, not ideological—stressing that the proposals fail to meet legal requirements. It maintains a constructive approach, thoroughly explaining why specific proposals cannot be adopted.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-21
Second reading of the bill amending the Income Tax Act and the Defence Service Act, and the bill amending the Income Tax Act (509 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

He/She criticizes the proposals put forth by the Isamaa faction, noting that their three proposed amendments failed to gain support. Criticism is also leveled at the creation of the "tax hump," which is deemed a misguided decision spearheaded by Isamaa. Nevertheless, the speaker maintains a constructive approach, focusing on policy measures rather than resorting to personal attacks.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-13
Second reading of the draft law on the 2025 state budget (513 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.

The speaker criticizes the amendment proposals put forth by EKRE and Isamaa, labeling them as either improper or unrealistic, specifically calling Isamaa's "alternative budget" "political satire." They defend the government's policy against the opposition's accusations, arguing that the criticism is often unfounded. Nevertheless, a constructive approach is maintained by acknowledging well-formulated proposals.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-13
Draft law amending the 2024 State Budget Act (517 SE) – Second Reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.

Directly criticizes the Isamaa faction, and Helir-Valdor Seeder in particular, accusing them of submitting technically flawed amendments and twisting words. [The speaker/source] argues that the opposition is not following proper procedural rules and is submitting unprofessional proposals. Nevertheless, [the speaker/source] simultaneously expects the opposition to acknowledge the government's budget cut decisions.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-13
Draft law amending the State Budget Act (511 SE) - Second Reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.

The speaker sharply criticizes those politicians who previously supported the transition to activity-based budgeting but are now criticizing it. He expresses astonishment at their contradictory behavior and specifically names Aivar Sõerd as a constant critic of the methodology. The criticism is principled and fact-based.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-10-16
Draft law on the 2025 state budget (513 SE) - first reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

He/She directly criticizes the previous government (2018–2019), accusing them of mismanaging reserves. They challenge the opposition’s claims that tax increases will stifle economic growth, presenting counterarguments. They also criticize the dismantling of the second pension pillar as a "cynical mistake."
View Profile View Agenda
2024-10-15
First reading of the draft law amending the Income Tax Act and the Defence Service Act, and the draft law amending the Income Tax Act (509 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session

It is noted that Martin Helme and Aivar Kokk voted against concluding the first reading, but no direct criticism is expressed toward them. The text approaches the opposition's position neutrally, focusing on factual information.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-10-15
Draft law amending the 2024 State Budget Act (517 SE) – first reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session

They do not express a direct opposition stance, but they do voice some criticism regarding the current frequency of budget oversight. They mention disagreements with ministers concerning the justification of transferred funds, but maintain a constructive approach throughout. They avoid personal attacks and refrain from using sharp rhetoric.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-09-25
Draft law amending the Income Tax Act and the Defence Service Act (432 SE) – First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session

Expressing clear opposition to the bill put forth by the Isamaa faction, which has been dubbed the "fictitious tax hump." The criticism is primarily policy-based, not personal, focusing on the substantive lack of merit in the draft legislation.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-07-29
Second Reading of the Motor Vehicle Tax Bill (364 UA)

15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu

Sharply criticizes the amendments proposed by the opposition factions (EKRE, Center Party, Isamaa), labeling them as obstructionist and technically deficient. Accuses the opposition of submitting 374 amendments, many of which are, in their assessment, technically flawed or simply pointless. Defends the committee's decision to bundle the amendments together, citing the positions taken by the Supreme Court.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-07-15
Reconsideration of the Motor Vehicle Tax Act (364 UA) left unpromulgated by the President of the Republic

15th Riigikogu, Extraordinary session of the Riigikogu

The speaker moderately criticizes the opposition’s obstructionist tactics, referencing 831 amendments which he/she deems devoid of substance ("in increments of 1 euro and 0.01%"). He/She clearly distinguishes substantive proposals from obstruction, but maintains a diplomatic tone. The criticism is presented on procedural grounds, not personally.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-06-19
Third Reading of the Draft Law on the State Supplementary Budget for 2024 (Bill 456 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, extra plenary sitting

He/She directly criticizes the Isamaa faction’s proposed amendments, labeling them "doubly populist" and legally flawed. He/She dismisses Reinsalu’s accusations, noting that the 2023 budget was passed down by the predecessor and had received support from all parliamentary groups. He/She maintains a professional approach, choosing to focus on highlighting technical shortcomings rather than engaging in personal attacks.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-06-14
Second Reading of the Draft State Supplementary Budget Act for 2024 (456 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, additional plenary session

The speaker directly criticizes the Isamaa faction's proposed amendments, labeling them as non-compliant with legal requirements and overly vague. They dispute Urmas Reinsalu's assertions regarding budget surpluses, accusing him of conflating figures and erroneously including the balances of various funds (the Unemployment Insurance Fund and the Health Insurance Fund). Furthermore, the speaker dismisses accusations that the coalition is raising taxes.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-06-13
Financial Supervision Authority 2023 Annual Report

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session

It does not express direct opposition towards specific individuals or groups. Rather, it offers constructive criticism regarding the current regulatory framework, focusing on systemic shortcomings, not personal attacks.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-06-12
Second reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Land Tax Act (437 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.

The address contains no direct opposition or criticism toward others. Instead, it represents a supportive and cooperative approach.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-06-12
Third Reading of the Motor Vehicle Tax Bill (364 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.

He moderately criticizes the opposition’s positions, arguing that the draft bill nevertheless moved in the direction the opposition desired. Specifically, he corrects Urmas Reinsalu’s mistaken claims regarding the cumulation of the registration fee. Overall, he maintains a constructive tone, focusing on correcting factual errors.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-06-10
First Reading of the Draft Act on the 2024 Supplementary Budget (456 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

It avoids direct criticism, but objectively presents the positions of opposition member Aivar Kokk, who deemed the austerity measures inadequate. It also mentions Aivar Sõerd's critique concerning the reduction of business support, but the source itself remains a neutral mediator, refraining from personal attacks.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-06-05
Second reading of the Motor Vehicle Tax Bill (364 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The text criticizes the obstructionist tactics employed by the opposition parties (Isamaa, EKRE, Center Party), noting they submitted 831 amendments without any constructive cooperation. It accuses them of failing to reach a unified position even within their own parliamentary groups. Furthermore, it stresses that the opposition did not offer a substantive alternative, focusing instead only on hindering the processing of the draft bill.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-06-04
First reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Appointment of a Member of the Council of the Bank of Estonia from among the Members of the Riigikogu" (445 OE)

15th Riigikogu, third session, plenary sitting

Insufficient data.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-06-04
First Reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Appointment of a Member of the Council of the Bank of Estonia from among the Members of the Riigikogu" (446 OE)

15th Riigikogu, third session, plenary sitting

There is not enough data.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-30
Discussion of the nationally important issue: "How can the state avoid living in debt?"

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting

The speaker offers moderate criticism of those who advocate increasing the debt burden for the sake of economic growth, labeling such viewpoints as unfounded. The criticism is aimed at political choices rather than specific individuals. He is particularly critical of the excessive reliance on the indexation system, referencing Jürgen Ligi’s previous warnings on the matter.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-29
First reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic for Lowering the Value-Added Tax on Domestic Fruits and Vegetables to 5 Percent" (406 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

Insufficient data
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-29
Third Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the 2024 State Budget Act (389 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

Does not express direct criticism towards specific individuals or groups. Defended the speed of the procedural process, rejecting accusations of working at a "turtle's pace." Admits that some local governments have not trusted the government regarding the early raising of teachers' salaries.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-14
First Reading of the Draft Basic Education Act (419 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

Insufficient data
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-13
Proposal by the Chancellor of Justice for bringing the Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Prevention Act, the Credit Institutions Act, the Law of Obligations Act, and the State Fees Act into conformity with the Constitution

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session

No direct criticism is expressed towards specific individuals or parties. Rather, it points to systemic problems in the banking sector and contradictions in regulations. The criticism is constructive and aimed at solving problems, not assigning blame.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-08
The 2024 Report by the Minister of Finance on the implementation of the state's long-term development strategy "Eesti 2035" (including an overview of public service development trends in 2022 and 2023)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session.

It indirectly criticizes other factions or speakers who resort to personal attacks instead of focusing on the substance. The criticism is procedural rather than politically motivated, centering on the standards of debate culture.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-07
Second Reading of the Draft Act Amending the 2024 State Budget Act (389 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

It rejected all seven amendment proposals from the opposition factions (Isamaa and EKRE), citing insufficient funding sources and the limited nature of government reserves. The criticism is substantive and procedural, not personal.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-02
First Reading of the Riigikogu Draft Statement (420 AE) "On Declaring the Moscow Patriarchate an Institution Supporting the Military Aggression of the Russian Federation"

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The main adversary is the Moscow Patriarchate, viewed as an institution supporting Russia's military aggression. The criticism is both political and religious-moral in nature, emphasizing the contradiction between Christian teaching and the support for military action. The possibility of compromise is not mentioned.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-02
Continuation of the first reading of the Bill on the Tax on Sweetened Beverages (418 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

A direct stance of opposition is not evident—the speaker focuses on presenting facts and clarifying procedural matters without offering critical assessments.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-04-03
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the 2024 State Budget Act (389 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session

A direct opposition stance is not apparent. The speaker does not criticize other political forces or individuals, but rather focuses on constructive problem solving and submitting questions to the ministries.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-04-03
Second Reading of the Bill for the Amendment of the Income Tax Act (337 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session

It mentions that EKRE submitted 200 amendments, but later withdrew them, and Isamaa's five proposals were rejected. The tone is neutral and factual, without sharp criticism of the opposition, focusing instead on procedural aspects.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-04-03
Second reading of the Draft Act on the Amendment of the Law on Exchange of Tax Information, the Taxation Procedure Act, and the Income Tax Act (379 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session

Direct opposition is not expressed. Rather, emphasis is placed on a consensual approach, noting that no amendments were submitted and interest groups offered no proposals for change. This demonstrates a cooperative attitude toward the legislative process.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-03-19
First Reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic to Lower the VAT Rate on Cancer Medicines" (277 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

It neutrally mentions the 50 alternative amendments proposed by the Estonian Conservative People's Party, which were later withdrawn. Criticism is absent, focusing solely on the factual description.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-03-13
First Reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic to Lower the Value Added Tax on Foodstuffs and Medicines to 5 Percent" (272 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting.

Does not offer direct criticism against the Estonian Conservative People's Party, but rejects their proposal using factual arguments. Indirectly criticizes the submission of 50 alternative amendments and their subsequent withdrawal, labeling it ineffective action.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-03-12
First Reading of the Draft Act amending the State Budget Act (391 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd plenary sitting

A direct stance of opposition is not evident, but the speaker indirectly criticizes the current system where constitutional institutions must hold budget negotiations with the very entities they control. He/She mentions lagging salaries and a lack of autonomy as problems, but presents this as constructive criticism, not an attack.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-03-07
Debate on the matter of national importance, "The Future of Estonian Energy 2035," initiated by the Estonian Reform Party parliamentary group.

Fifteenth Riigikogu, third sitting, plenary session

There is no direct criticism aimed at specific opponents or groups. Instead, it expresses concern regarding overly subsidized and closed state energy markets, favoring market-based solutions. The approach is constructive, not confrontational.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-03-05
2024 Report by the Minister of Education and Research on the Implementation of the State's Long-Term Development Strategy "Eesti 2035" (Education Reforms)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The text challenges the methodology used for comparing education expenditures presented by the minister, specifically criticizing the improper accounting of European Union grants. It also questions the proposed solution for extending compulsory education, offering an alternative approach. The criticism is methodological in its justification rather than personal.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-02-21
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Value Added Tax Act (286 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

Direct criticism is avoided; instead, the focus remains on the divergence of political positions. It references Jürgen Ligi’s counterarguments and questions, but frames them neutrally as elements of the debate rather than a personal conflict.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-02-14
First Reading of the Motor Vehicle Tax Bill (364 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

It moderately criticizes obstructionist behavior in the legislative process, specifically referencing "obstructionist bills" that lack a formal intent to draft or a preparatory plan. It expresses opposition to general tax concessions that fail to truly reach those who need assistance. The critique is delivered systemically rather than personally.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-02-07
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Value-Added Tax Act (264 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting.

A direct opposition stance is not voiced. The speaker merely announces the joint position of the commission and the government regarding the rejection of the bill, but offers no personal critical arguments.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-02-07
First Reading of the Bill to Amend the Income Tax Act (230 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting.

Does not express direct confrontation, but rather conveys the commission's collective decision regarding the rejection of the draft bill. Notes the government's non-supportive stance neutrally, without personal criticism.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-02-07
First Reading of the Bill (217 SE) to Amend the Income Tax Act

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting.

While not voicing direct opposition, it notes the government's non-supportive stance on the draft bill. It neutrally highlights that six members of the committee supported the motion to reject the bill, suggesting a critical view of the bill’s current formulation.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-02-07
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Income Tax Act (182 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting.

The speaker expresses clear opposition to the draft amendment of the Income Tax Act, justifying this by the bill's identical nature to the previous one, and recommending its rejection.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-02-07
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Income Tax Act (177 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting.

It does not issue direct criticism towards individuals or parties, but instead focuses on the substantive and procedural critique of the draft legislation. It highlights technical deficiencies, such as spelling errors and an ambiguous effective date for entry into force.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-02-06
First reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Recall of a Member of the Riigikogu from the Bank of Estonia Supervisory Board and Appointment of a New Member" (366 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

No information available—the speech neither criticizes anyone nor takes opposing viewpoints.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-24
First Reading of the Bill on Amendments to the Income Tax Act (248 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

Insufficient data
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-24
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Income Tax Act (219 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

There is not enough data.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-24
First Reading of the Bill to Amend the Income Tax Act (197 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The Speaker expressed clear opposition to the amendments to the Income Tax Act, demanding the complete rejection of the bill. The nature of the opposition was procedural and categorical, without seeking compromise.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-24
First reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Income Tax Act (Bill 186 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The speaker voices institutional opposition to the draft bill amending the Income Tax Act, but refrains from launching personal or harsh attacks. The opposition is formal and procedural.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-24
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Income Tax Act (Bill 180 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The speaker supports the rejection of the draft bill amending the Income Tax Act, but does not present specific objections or criticism.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-24
First Reading of the Bill for the Amendment of the Income Tax Act (179 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

Not enough data
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-24
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Income Tax Act (Bill 154 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The speaker opposes the amendments to the Income Tax Law, but fails to present any specific objections or criticism. The opposition is procedural, not substantive.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-24
First Reading of the Draft Act amending the Income Tax Act (152 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The speaker expressed clear opposition to the amendments to the Income Tax Act but did not offer specific arguments or directly criticize the opposing side.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-24
First Reading of the Bill on Amendments to the Income Tax Act (125 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

Insufficient data
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-24
First Reading of the Bill Amending the Income Tax Act (120 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The speaker presented the Finance Committee's position opposing the draft bill, but failed to offer specific arguments or directly criticize the opposition.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-24
First Reading of the Bill to Amend the Income Tax Act (117 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

Insufficient Data
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-24
First reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Alcohol, Tobacco, Fuel, and Electricity Excise Duty Act (255 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

Insufficient data
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-24
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Alcohol, Tobacco, Fuel, and Electricity Excise Duty Act (237 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

Insufficient data
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-24
First reading of the Draft Act amending the Alcohol, Tobacco, Fuel, and Electricity Excise Tax Act (Bill 202 SE).

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

Insufficient data.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-24
First reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Alcohol, Tobacco, Fuel, and Electricity Excise Duty Act (Bill 185 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The speaker offered no direct criticism of specific individuals or groups, but merely presented the Finance Committee's official position regarding the rejection of the draft bill.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-24
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Alcohol, Tobacco, Fuel, and Electricity Excise Duty Act (170 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

Insufficient data
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-24
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Alcohol, Tobacco, Fuel, and Electricity Excise Duty Act (129 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The speaker voiced opposition to the specific bill but did not present detailed arguments or directly criticize the opposing side. The reasons for the opposition remained unexplained.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-24
First reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Alcohol, Tobacco, Fuel, and Electricity Excise Duty Act (Bill 126 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

There is not enough data.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-24
First Reading of the Draft Act Amending the Alcohol, Tobacco, Fuel, and Electricity Excise Duty Act (Bill 123 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

Insufficient data
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-24
First Reading of the Draft Act amending the Alcohol, Tobacco, Fuel, and Electricity Excise Duty Act (Bill 119 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The speaker expresses opposition to a specific bill, but does not level direct accusations or criticism against opponents. The rationale or intensity of the opposition remains unclear in the given address.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-24
First Reading of the Bill to Amend the Alcohol, Tobacco, Fuel, and Electricity Excise Duty Act (111 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

Opposes the excise duty amendments supported by Martin Helme, Aivar Kokk, Siim Pohlak, and Kersti Sarapuu. The opposition is clearly politically motivated, not personal.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-18
Debate on the National Issue of Crucial Importance: "Strong Rural Schools and a Strong School Network"

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The speaker is criticizing those who visit the Lääneranna municipality and subsequently undermine the local government's efforts regarding the merging of small schools. The criticism is primarily procedural, focusing on the violation of the municipality's autonomy.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-17
First Reading of the Bill amending the Income Tax Act (254 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

Insufficient data
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-17
First Reading of the Bill for the Amendment of the Income Tax Act (252 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The speaker expresses opposition to the bill amending the Income Tax Act, but does not present specific lines of criticism or name concrete opponents. The grounds for the opposition remain unexplained.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-17
Draft Act on Amendments to the Income Tax Act (211 SE), First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The Speaker expresses opposition to the draft amendment of the Income Tax Act, but does not directly criticize specific individuals or groups. The reasons for the opposition are left unstated.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-17
First Reading of the Bill for the Amendment of the Income Tax Act (201 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

Not enough data
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-17
First Reading of the Draft Act Amending the Income Tax Act (200 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

Insufficient data
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-17
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Income Tax Act (Bill 172 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The opposition's stated position is directed against the specific bill, not delivered through personal attacks. The criticism is clearly policy-based, focusing on the economic consequences of the draft legislation and the insufficient analysis provided. The possibility of compromise is not mentioned—the stance is a categorical rejection.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-17
First Reading of the Bill for the Amendment of the Income Tax Act (134 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The criticism is directed at the presenter of the draft bill, not on a personal level, but on a procedural one, emphasizing the provision of incorrect information. The opposition is constructive and focused on ensuring the proper procedure is followed.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-17
First Reading of the Bill for the Amendment of the Income Tax Act (131 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

Insufficient data
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-17
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Income Tax Act (113 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

There is not enough data.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-17
First Reading of the Bill on Amendments to the Income Tax Act (109 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

There is not enough data.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-17
First Reading of the Bill to Amend the Income Tax Act (107 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

They do not express direct opposition, but neutrally note that the government does not support the current or subsequent bills. The position is more informative than confrontational.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-17
First Reading of the Bill to Amend the Income Tax Act (249 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

Insufficient data
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-17
First Reading of the Bill on Amendments to the Income Tax Act (247 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

Insufficient data
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-17
First Reading of the Bill for the Amendment of the Income Tax Act (242 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

He/She/It expresses clear opposition to the income tax rate reduction bill, but the criticism is based purely on political substance, not personal or procedural grounds.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-17
First reading of the Bill amending the Income Tax Act (235 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

Insufficient data
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-17
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Income Tax Act (Bill 234 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

Insufficient data
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-17
First reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Income Tax Act (Bill 233 SE).

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The Speaker opposes the income tax reduction bill initiated by EKRE, relying on the collective decision of the Finance Committee. The criticism is procedural and political rather than personal, delivered using a softly ironic tone.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-17
First reading of the Bill for the Amendment of the Income Tax Act (198 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The Speaker voiced opposition to the draft bill amending the Income Tax Act, but failed to present any direct critical arguments or name specific opponents. The grounds for the opposition were left unstated.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-17
Draft Act Amending the Income Tax Act (195 SE), First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The speaker expresses opposition to the draft amendment of the Income Tax Act, but does not present specific critical arguments or name opponents; they focus only on the committee's decision to reject the bill.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-17
First reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Income Tax Act (187 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

Insufficient data
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-17
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Income Tax Act (Bill 183 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

Due to the lack of data, the oppositional stance cannot be evaluated.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-17
First Reading of the Bill on Amendments to the Income Tax Act (178 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

Insufficient data
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-17
First reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Income Tax Act (153 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

There is not enough data.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-17
First Reading of the Bill on Amendments to the Income Tax Act (128 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The Speaker opposes the amendments to the Income Tax Act but has not presented specific objections or criticism regarding the content of the bill. The grounds for the opposition were left unstated.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-17
First Reading of the Draft Act Amending the Income Tax Act (122 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

Insufficient data
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-17
Draft Bill Amending the Income Tax Act (118 SE), First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The speaker voiced clear opposition to the draft amendment of the Income Tax Act, backing the committee's stance on rejecting the bill. However, the specific reasons for this opposition were not detailed.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-17
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Income Tax Act (Bill 115 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The Speaker voices opposition to the amendments to the Income Tax Act, but fails to present specific critical arguments or name any opponents. The grounds for the opposition remain unclarified.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-17
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Income Tax Act (114 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

Insufficient data
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-17
First Reading of the Bill to Amend the Income Tax Act (103 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The speaker supports the Finance Committee’s decision to recommend rejecting the draft amendment to the Income Tax Act, but offers no specific objections or criticism.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-17
First Reading of the Bill on Amendments to the Income Tax Act (102 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

There is not enough data.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-10
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Value-Added Tax Act (250 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

Not enough data
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-10
First Reading of the Bill on Amendments to the Value Added Tax Act (245 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

Insufficient data
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-10
First Reading of the Draft Act amending the Value Added Tax Act (Bill 241 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

Insufficient data
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-10
First Reading of the Bill on Amendments to the Value-Added Tax Act (240 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

Insufficient data
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-10
First reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Value Added Tax Act (Bill 239 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The speaker directly criticizes EKRE, accusing the party of internal contradictions regarding the issue of tax rates. The criticism is political and procedural, not personal, focusing instead on the party's lack of consistency.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-10
Draft Act on Amendments to the Value Added Tax Act (Bill 238 SE), First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

Insufficient data
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-10
First Reading of the Draft Act Amending the Value-Added Tax Act (Bill 236 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The Speaker voices clear opposition to the amendments to the Value Added Tax Act, relying on the collective decision of the Finance Committee. The criticism is procedural and institutional.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-10
First reading of the Bill on Amendments to the Value Added Tax Act (220 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

Does not express direct criticism towards individuals or parties, but notes neutrally that no questions were asked of Martin Helme, the presenter of the draft bill. The opposition is procedural rather than personal.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-10
First Reading of the Bill to Amend the Value-Added Tax Act (196 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

Insufficient data
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-10
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Value Added Tax Act (193 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

There is insufficient data.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-10
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Value Added Tax Act (184 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

He rejects the accusations made by Martin Helme and the forces he represents, particularly the accusation of lying. The opposition is not receiving support from the government for its proposed amendments to the Value-Added Tax Act. The criticism is factual rather than personal, focusing instead on differences in political positions.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-10
First reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Value Added Tax Act (169 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The speaker notes that Martin Helme was not asked any questions by the commission, but adds that this is intended as a neutral observation rather than direct criticism or confrontation.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-10
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Value Added Tax Act (149 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

There is not enough data.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-10
First reading of the Draft Act amending the Value-Added Tax Act (Bill 132 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The speaker supports the Finance Committee's proposal to reject the draft amendment to the Value Added Tax Act at the first reading, but does not voice specific objections or criticism.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-10
First Reading of the Bill on Amendments to the Value-Added Tax Act (108 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

There is not enough data.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-10
First Reading of the Draft Act amending the Value Added Tax Act (87 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The speaker directly supports the rejection of the draft law initiated by opposition representative Martin Helme. No compromise is being sought with the opposition; instead, the clear coalition majority within the committee is being adhered to.
View Profile View Agenda
Back to Profiling