By Months: Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart
Total Months: 19
Fully Profiled: 19
10.2025
20 Speeches
The speaker demonstrates expertise regarding the legal and constitutional aspects of the car tax, referencing the Chancellor of Justice's formal address and the President's previous decision not to proclaim the law. They also possess detailed knowledge of social policy measures, such as support payments for people with disabilities, the cap on parental benefits, and the withdrawal of health insurance from stay-at-home mothers. Technical terms like "specific provisions" and "multiple taxation" are utilized.
09.2025
85 Speeches
The speaker demonstrates a broad store of knowledge: economic and tax policy and the state's finances (taxes, income tax, VAT, subsidies), energy policy (the Enefit Green and inside information case), healthcare financial management (Health Insurance Fund), traffic accident insurance and regulation of light traffic users, and constitutional rights and oversight. References the fundamentals of the National Audit Office, the Financial Supervision Authority, and criminal proceedings, and uses specific numbers and legal references (Constitution §12, §284).
06.2025
68 Speeches
Demonstrates a strong body of knowledge in the fields of traffic law, urban space regulation, and safety, using specific examples (age checks, helmet rentals, driver's license verification), and international comparisons. Highlights numbers and studies (2024 accident statistics, practices of countries like Germany/Lithuania/Paris, etc.) that illustrate reasoned analysis. Thus, their expertise is revealed in explaining both legislative solutions and the nuances of safety and health protection.
05.2025
46 Speeches
In places, it demonstrates a strong competence in the areas of rule-of-law regulation and administrative and minor offense proceedings (minor offense proceedings vs. administrative proceedings, procedural law, the Pandora's Box risk). It refers to specific nuances of the legal system and the Supreme Court’s ruling (Olerex) and the Chancellor of Justice’s viewpoints as evidence. It demonstrates a long-standing discussion on the forms of transposition of directives and argues for a thorough understanding of the technical aspects of the proceedings.
04.2025
32 Speeches
Demonstrated is strong knowledge of the energy industry and stock market policy (Enefit Green, privatization/acquisition of Eesti Energia), financial policy (taxes, budget, income tax, VAT), and with awareness of anti-corruption oversight (insider lists, Financial Supervision Authority). Benefit is derived from specific numerical examples (e.g., 68 million euros, 42% of accidents with Bolt electric scooters, 25 kilogram limit). Legal and constitutional arguments are utilized (Article 28 of the Constitution).
03.2025
19 Speeches
Demonstrates a strong body of knowledge in analyzing state aid characteristics, within the context of the National Audit Office's audits and court rulings (e.g., the Supreme Court, the Olerex precedent). Refers to specific data (1.5 million euros, 1,140,000 euros), regarding KredEx loans and the proceedings of special committees, and through background information on international aviation, attempts to explain risky contractual decisions. Incorporates cited sources (special committees, the Prosecutor's Office, the National Audit Office) into their statements to substantiate claims and to highlight the importance of constitutionality and state aid rules.
02.2025
34 Speeches
Utilizes materials from the Conjunction Institute and the National Audit Office, as well as discussions on energy policy, as a basis for evidence (e.g., Peeter Raudsepp, National Audit Office, energy sector development plan). Mentions nuances of the economy and consumer behaviour (consumption loans, savings, the impact of car taxes and value-added tax). Represents a scientific approach to the necessity of calculations and impact analyses (impact analyses, development plans).
01.2025
39 Speeches
Demonstrates a strong body of knowledge regarding the complexities of healthcare infrastructure, the budget process, and funding: specifically highlighting European Union funding (2021–2022) of 280 million euros, the anticipated additional funding from the state of 300 million, and Tallinn’s planned participation of approximately 550 million; also addresses materials from special commissions related to corruption and details of the Nordica case (190,000 euros per month with a contract); emphasizes expenditure and revenue lines, activity-based budgeting criticism, and potential solutions.
12.2024
25 Speeches
The representative demonstrates knowledge of the state budget, participation policy, and the context of the special commission against corruption, referencing the results of the National Audit Office's audit and changes in tax revenues (for example, in September, revenues were 43 million euros less than the forecast). They analyze contradictions in the owner's expectations within the State Energy sector and the role and substitution of explanatory notes, demonstrating a technical understanding of budget and corporate management topics. They highlight the complexities of board work and the need for transparency, using examples such as Rail Baltic data and participation policy issues.
11.2024
34 Speeches
Throughout the entire series of speeches, a strong authority emerges regarding the state budget and public sector funding: it refers to the State Audit Office's audits (impact analysis inadequate), the problems of the RMK’s secret contracts, observations concerning timber prices and growth costs, and discrepancies in the feasibility analysis of Rail Baltic. It uses specific figures (e.g., 23.8 billion euros in expenses, 11.8 billion euros in potential revenue, 9 different amounts for Rail Baltic) and emphasizes the need for clear bases and the legal requirements of relevant documents.
10.2024
40 Speeches
Utilizes and refers to the state budget law, the visibility of budget lines, and the legal impact of the explanatory memorandum, as well as the criticism of the State Auditor General and the Chancellor of Justice. Mentions technical terms such as budget lines, explanatory memorandum, and a threshold of 500,000 euros, demonstrating an understanding of budget transparency requirements.
09.2024
20 Speeches
Demonstrates a strong understanding of the constitutionality and quality of legislation (refers to constitutional articles §50, §10, §28; discusses explanatory memoranda and procedural matters). Uses argumentation incorporating criticism of state budget impact assessments and the adoption of European Union norms, emphasizing the requirement that these norms must be reconciled with the constitution. Poses specific questions and analyses relating to car taxes and the ombudsman's observations, demonstrating legal and political attentiveness.
07.2024
3 Speeches
Demonstrates a substantial body of knowledge concerning constitutional law and European Union law, as well as the principle of equal treatment, citing legal analyses and observations from the Supreme Court. Emphasis is placed on the protection of the rights of people with disabilities within the context of constitutional and international obligations and the assessment of the impact of support mechanisms.
06.2024
39 Speeches
The speaker demonstrates a high-level understanding of parliamentary processes, constitutional review, and the rules of procedure of the Riigikogu, referencing issues of compatibility between European Union law and domestic law. Concrete examples are used: procedure binding, amendment tables, constitutional limitations, and international legal acts that demand precise legal order and transparency. They also highlight the lack of analysis regarding the economic impact of financial and taxation decisions, drawing on explanatory memoranda of laws, and arguments from the Court and law enforcement.
05.2024
65 Speeches
The speaker demonstrates knowledge of parliamentary procedures, the complexities of incorporating European Union law, and the necessity of impact analysis. Opinions from the European Commission are cited, and reference is made to the interaction of draft bills’ technical aspects, for example, in the context of whistleblower and hate speech laws, and the technical risks of e-voting. There is also a willingness to address the nuances of cultural heritage protection, local government funding, and school sports support programs, as well as their impact on the state budget.
04.2024
61 Speeches
The core areas represented are constitutional law and the connections of European Union law, and the impact of tax changes on social groups. The speaker refers to constitutional protection (Article 28 of the Constitution for large families and people with disabilities), expresses criticism regarding the assessments of the European Commission, and utilizes legal analyses and the viewpoints of legal chancellors. They also highlight the necessary impact analysis in tax and budget matters, and the impact on international law. The basis for the material is questions, legal analyses, and the coordinates of constitutionality.
03.2024
34 Speeches
The representative demonstrates a deep connection with constitutional and European Union law, referring to Article 28 of the Constitution (large families under special state care) and the principles of legal certainty and legitimate expectation. They mention European Union law and Article 110 in relation to motor vehicle tax and use legal analyses (investigations, legal studies) as evidence. They display consistent legal and socio-political competence and a focus on the rule of law within the state.
02.2024
14 Speeches
The representative demonstrates a strong background in economics and public finance, referencing the National Audit Office report, the hotel association’s analyses, and using examples such as "80 million euros of cumulative losses" and "20% of tourism spending on hotels." They assess the importance of impact analyses and reflect on the wider economic consequences of tax changes. They rely on statistics and studies (National Audit Office, hotel association) and use numbers and comparisons (the Latvian example, EURIBOR, etc.) to substantiate their arguments.
01.2024
30 Speeches
Demonstrates a strong body of knowledge regarding the financing of education, local government budgets, economics, and investments; refers to specific numbers (for example, 1.5% of GDP for higher education, 3% for research and development, 2% for the private sector). When discussing legal system procedures, it emphasizes the importance of drafting intentions, impact analysis, and constitutional conformity checks. It uses references to European forecasts and analyses from other institutions to substantiate its viewpoints.