By Plenary Sessions: Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart

The speech demonstrates an understanding of the issue of constitutional amendment and the nuances of the suffrage debate, pointing to the continuity in the evolution of viewpoints and the overarching coalition context.

The speakers reference European Union taxation directives (including the vote on 25.04.2023) and the substance of the coalition agreement, demonstrating specialized knowledge of tax policy. The second speech focuses on constitutionality, the opinions issued by the Chancellors of Justice, and administrative court proceedings related to the car tax; legal terminology and procedure are employed. Consequently, expertise in tax policy, legal matters, and parliamentary procedures is apparent.

In the context of oversight and anti-corruption efforts, the following details are highlighted: the Just Transition Fund, the EIS support requirement, the €39 million Greenful grant and the exceeding of the €13 million limit; structures created by the business activities of three companies over a short period, and the connection between the proposed visit and private capital. The speaker also refers to the composition of the delegation and the role of the Ministry of Economic Affairs, and uses technical terms and figures to address issues concerning the transparency of financing and procedures.

Demonstrates a core understanding of constitutional issues (Article 28 of the Constitution) and the role of the Chancellor of Justice and the Supreme Court; the discussion is based on legal analyses and procedural aspects. Technical terms are employed, such as unequal treatment, constitutionality, and procedural restrictions, with reference made to analyses and court decisions as authoritative sources.

He highlights the issues concerning the work and transparency of the special committees, referencing specific discussion points: the classified contracts of RMK, the topic of offshore wind farms, and the question of the State Secretary. He notes that these issues have been discussed in various special committees, and several sessions were missed (or failed to convene due to non-attendance). This demonstrates the connection between knowledge and experience and the role of parliamentary procedure and the special committees.

The legal framework for state aid and the organization of special controls; transparency of RMK contracts and criticism regarding limitations on analyses (e.g., COBALT studies). It refers to the importance of the terms of reference and emphasizes the assessment of state aid throughout the entire contract lifecycle, alongside the consideration of the impact of market distortions. Knowledge is demonstrated regarding the National Audit Office audit and Supreme Court decisions (e.g., Olerex) concerning the effects of criminal law and procedural matters.

The presentation features a noticeable, fact-focused, and highly detailed approach to technically complex subjects. Specific figures are provided (1,140,000 euros, 190,000 euros per month, 25,000 euros per month, 1.5 million in loans), along with the relevant timeline (2023–2024). The roles of the Special Committee for Supervision and Anti-Corruption and the Prosecutor's Office, deficiencies in procurement, and funding streams are painstakingly described; references to official bodies (the Ministry of Climate, KredEx) are utilized. He/She demonstrates a comprehensive discussion of state funding issues within the aviation sector and their connections to the backgrounds of adjacent companies.