By Plenary Sessions: Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart

The speech centers on constitutional amendment issues and proposed changes to electoral law, stressing the importance of coalition consensus and the sensitivity inherent in the process. It offers no clear personal position, but cites the necessity of coalition stability and compromise as a key factor.

The legislator's priorities center on ensuring transparency in the implementation of European Union directives, addressing potential tax-related amendments, and managing the car tax procedure. The discussion covers the process, including the review of proposed amendments and proceedings in administrative courts. Furthermore, reference is made to the stances taken by the President and the Chancellor of Justice, which bear influence on the potential for repealing or modifying legislation. Both addresses underscore the necessity of scrutinizing and, where required, repealing controversial tax laws, alongside monitoring parliamentary transparency.

Not enough data

The crux of all the proposed legislation is the repeal or suspension of the car tax, along with the subsequent review of numerous amendments. Legal steps mentioned include the discussion of the Riigikogu's procedural and constitutional constraints, as well as the directives issued by the court and the Chancellor of Justice. They vow to continue legal disputes and introduce new bills aimed at abolishing the car tax and establishing compensation schemes.

The legislative focus centers on improving the operation of special committees and clarifying the mandatory attendance of ministers. The goal is to address outstanding issues and enhance the utilization of Question Time to ensure that the responses provided are sufficient.

Priorities include expanding the analysis of state aid and ensuring transparency regarding the RMK contract; recommendations for incorporating special audits and strengthening oversight. There is opposition to new, separate procedures for the Competition Authority; emphasis is placed on retaining misdemeanor proceedings for cases involving larger fines, along with references to Supreme Court precedents. It presents proposals for amendments and challenges the existing plan differently, stressing the consistency of legal norms and the proper implementation of EU directives.

The key legislative priorities include the full operational capacity and development of the special anti-corruption commission; demanding that management and council members be held accountable, and utilizing the mechanism of compulsory attendance if necessary. Emphasis is placed on the disclosure of materials and the strengthening of cooperation procedures within the framework of parliamentary oversight; cooperation with the prosecutor's office and the acceleration of document issuance are cited as priorities.