By Agendas: Aivar Kokk

Total Agendas: 145

Fully Profiled: 145

All Categories Political Position Topic Expertise Rhetorical Style Activity Patterns Opposition Stance Collaboration Style Regional Focus Economic Views Social Issues Legislative Focus
2025-10-13
Inquiry regarding the closure of the Endla Nature Centre (No. 815)

15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The rhetorical style is passionate, critical, and concerned ("it is sad to note"), highlighting the lack of transparency and the rushed nature of the decision-making process. The text employs both emotional appeals (referencing the concerns of 20,000 people on Facebook) and logical comparison, contrasting Tallinn's substantial expenditures with the meager budget of a rural region. The speaker utilizes direct questions and demands accountability.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-10-13
Inquiry concerning the revenue base of local governments (No. 802)

15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The speech is urgent in tone and sharply critical, especially regarding the government's actions, utilizing strong expressions such as "is lying" and "crap." The style is logical and fact-based, relying on concrete examples and figures, but it is delivered with emotional intensity, emphasizing the need for bold decisions.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-10-13
First Reading of the Draft Legislation (736 SE) on the Amendment of the State Budget Act and the Act Amending the State Budget Act

15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The tone is predominantly critical, demanding, and at times combative, particularly concerning the government's actions and lack of trustworthiness. Logical appeals are employed, relying on specific figures and the necessity of legislative amendments, but sharp accusations are also included (e.g., money is being thrown into a "black hole"). The style remains formal, yet it incorporates sharp political warnings (e.g., the fear that the tax hike will return after the elections).
View Profile View Agenda
2025-10-13
First reading of the Draft Act on the Amendment of the Act on Simplified Taxation of Business Income and the Income Tax Act, and the Act on the Repeal of the Security Tax Act and the Amendment of the Income Tax Act (Bill 734 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The rhetorical style is confrontational and accusatory, employing direct rhetorical questions to demand accountability and cast doubt on the motives of the bill's proposer ("why are you supporting this scheming then"). The tone is logical and data-driven, emphasizing budget figures and fiscal responsibility to highlight the seriousness of the problem.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-10-13
First Reading of the Draft Act on the 2025 State Supplementary Budget (733 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The rhetorical style is demanding, skeptical, and at times accusatory, leveling pointed questions and voicing frustration regarding the minister's responsiveness. Direct accusations of opaqueness and ignorance are used ("not a single minister in the government knows anything about this"), yet the form of address remains formal ("Honorable Minister").
View Profile View Agenda
2025-10-08
Continuation of the first reading of the Draft Law on the State Budget for 2026 (737 SE)

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The rhetorical style is highly combative, critical, and accusatory, employing strong emotional appeals ("Shame on you!"). The speaker contrasts data-based arguments (figures on taxes and loans) with sharp accusations regarding the government’s lying and failure. The tone is harsh, and the objective is to highlight the moral and political injustice of the opponents’ actions.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-10-07
First Reading of the 2026 State Budget Bill (737 SE)

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The style is critical and direct, employing accusatory and intense language ("the biggest loan burden of all time"). The speaker uses a rhetorical device, referencing the minister's earlier advice on saving money ("buy canned goods"), to emphasize the contradiction and inconsistency of the government's actions.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-10-06
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Motor Vehicle Tax Act (Bill 677 SE)

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The rhetorical style is sharply critical, combative, and at times ironic, especially when recalling the previous voting behavior of the coalition partners. Specific examples and historical facts (voting results, the Kopli command incident) are used to support logical arguments. The speaker employs strong metaphors, for example, demanding the tax be repealed rather than "cutting off the dog's tail piece by piece."
View Profile View Agenda
2025-10-06
First reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Motor Vehicle Tax Act (694 SE)

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The rhetorical style is highly combative and critical, accusing ministers and the coalition of ignorance regarding the draft bill and outright lying ("calling black white"). Both logical arguments (errors in the explanatory memorandum) and emotional appeals (the removal of benefits from large families) are employed. The tone is formal, yet direct and intense, highlighting the government's "blunder."
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-10
Draft law amending the Construction Code and other laws (655 SE) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session

The speaker employs very direct, emotional, and sometimes harshly critical rhetoric. They often start with the phrase "for crying out loud" and use colloquialisms like "fluff and nonsense" and "a complete muddle." The style is informal, incorporating personal examples and experiences, and blends emotional judgments with technical facts. The tone is often angry and frustrated, particularly when criticizing the quality of the draft legislation.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-10
Draft law amending the Competition Act (654 SE) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session

The speaker employs a polite yet determined questioning style, addressing the minister with a respectful salutation ("Dear Minister!"). They pose a series of consecutive clarifying questions, seeking specific answers. Real-life examples are provided to support the arguments, all while maintaining a constructive tone throughout the dialogue.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-10
Draft law (667 SE) for amending the Atmosphere Protection Act and other laws (partial transposition of amendments to the directive on greenhouse gas emission trading) - second reading

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session

The speaker employs direct and emotional rhetoric, combining personal attacks ("very poor negotiators") with fact-based arguments. The tone of speech is critical and confrontational, especially toward ministry officials. Colloquial expressions ("made two blunders") and rhetorical questions are used to emphasize their points.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-10
First reading of the draft resolution of the Riigikogu "Submitting a proposal to the Republic of Estonia's Government to develop tax incentives for student employment" (638 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session

They employ a personal and emotional approach, citing examples from their own family and business experience. The tone is direct and critical of the coalition, yet constructive concerning the substance of the draft bill. They conclude their remarks briefly and courteously, demonstrating respect for the session's established order.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-10
A written request for a vote of no confidence in Social Minister Karmen Joller, submitted by 21 members of the Riigikogu.

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session

It employs a direct and personal approach, addressing the minister using the informal "you" (the "sa" form). The style is critical but not aggressive; it stresses that the minister's work is not being criticized in general. It uses clear assertions ("I will say honestly and clearly") and concrete examples to back up its viewpoints. It reiterates its core message at key junctures.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-04
Chair implementation

15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu

They employ direct and confrontational rhetoric, repeatedly accusing the opposition of lying and breaking the law. The speaker relies on facts and concrete examples, utilizing emotional appeals particularly when describing the plight of families and people with disabilities. The overall tone is often critical and accusatory, especially when assessing the work of various committees and the actions taken by the government.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-19
Draft Law on Annulment of the Motor Vehicle Tax Act (647 SE) - First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The speaker employs emotional and combative rhetoric, combining it with specific facts and examples. He uses figurative expressions such as "tax festival" and "howling along with the wolves," and provides real-life examples (a family with six children, a single parent of a child in a wheelchair). The style is direct and critical, incorporating both irony and strong accusations aimed at the coalition.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-18
Draft law amending the Police and Border Guard Act (670 SE) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The tone of delivery is directly confrontational and accusatory, utilizing rhetorical questions and direct challenges aimed at the presenter. The style is emotionally charged ("very sad"), yet it relies on concrete facts and personal investigative experience concerning how the system functions.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-18
Third reading of the draft law on the state's supplementary budget for 2025 (651 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

It employs highly aggressive and confrontational rhetoric, blending emotional expressions ("embarrassing," "bluff") with specific numerical arguments. The rhetoric is distinctly accusatory and polarizing, repeatedly using contrast ("high-wage earners vs. pensioners"). The style is direct and uncompromising.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-16
Draft law amending the Emergency Situations Act and other laws (662 SE) - first reading

XV Riigikogu, V Session, Plenary Sitting

It employs a direct and interrogative approach, posing a sequence of specific questions. The tone is critical yet constructive, balancing concern with an acknowledgment of the law's necessity ("We all understand that this is important").
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-16
Draft law amending the Waste Act and, in consequence, amending other laws (657 SE) – first reading

XV Riigikogu, V Session, Plenary Sitting

He employs emotional and confrontational rhetoric, calling the reform "madness" and "silly nonsense." He relies heavily on numerical arguments and his personal experience as an entrepreneur. He utilizes rhetorical questions and comparisons (for instance, comparing someone who keeps two cows versus someone who keeps 2,000 cows) to underscore his points. The tone is critical and straightforward.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-04
Draft Law on Annulment of Excise Tax Increases on Energy Carriers (627 SE) - First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The speaker employs emotional and confrontational rhetoric, labeling the current tax policy "predatory behavior" and "madness." He/She combines personal attacks ("I am truly embarrassed for you") with specific numerical arguments, repeatedly drawing comparisons to the successful economic policy of 2020. The style is direct and populist, emphasizing the protection of "our people" and "our entrepreneurs" against the government.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-04
Draft law amending the Public Health Act (617 SE) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

They employ a personal and direct style, combining praise with criticism. The rhetoric is argumentative and grounded in experience, utilizing concrete examples and personal anecdotes. The text concludes with a constructive tone and words of encouragement, demonstrating a clear balance between critique and support.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-04
Draft law amending the State Audit Act, the Political Parties Act, and other laws (control body for political party funding) – first reading.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The speaking style is informal and humorous, leaning heavily on colloquial language (stuff like "absolute crap" or calling someone "the State Audit Office guy"). The speaker draws on personal experiences and anecdotes, addressing colleagues directly in the chamber. The overall tone is conversational rather than formal, often using rhetorical questions and irony.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-04
First reading of the draft resolution of the Riigikogu "Submitting a proposal to the Government of the Republic to initiate a bill amending the Traffic Act, which grants local governments the right to restrict or prohibit the use of rental electric scooters and mopeds" (618 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

An emotional and persuasive style, which emphasizes the importance of health as a core value ("You can't do anything without health"). It uses rhetorical questions and direct appeals to colleagues. The tone is concerned, yet constructive, calling for joint action to guide the government.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-21
Draft law on establishing tax peace (607 SE) – first reading

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.

It employs an emotional and combative tone, blending it with concrete facts and figures. The rhetoric is direct and critical, repeatedly utilizing irony and rhetorical questions. It concludes with an optimistic appeal to support the bill, promising rapid economic results.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-21
The Minister of Energy and Environment's 2025 presentation on the implementation of the long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035"

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.

Adopts a direct and practical approach, starting courteously ("Dear Chairman! Dear Minister!") but quickly moving on to specific questions. Relies on facts and figures, but also acknowledges uncertainty ("maybe," "a little or quite a lot of bluff"). The style is technically informative rather than emotional.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-21
Taxes

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing.

Uses a direct and confrontational approach, demanding short and specific answers. Employs rhetorical questions and repeats the main question to maintain focus. Combines emotional arguments (the situation of pensioners and families) with fact-based data, while maintaining a firm and demanding tone.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-21
Burden on the economy

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing.

Uses a confrontational and accusatory tone, presenting rhetorical questions and direct accusations directed at the prime minister. The argument relies on numerical data and concrete examples, employing emotional appeal through descriptions of the situation facing families.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-20
Draft law amending the Enterprise Income Tax Simplification Act, the Security Tax Act, and the Income Tax Act (645 SE) – First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

Employs confrontational and emotional rhetoric, accusing the minister of lying ("that lie coming out of your mouth today") and labeling the policy "absurd" and "criminal." Combining personal attacks with fact-based arguments, the speaker concludes with the dramatic appeal: "Let's stop this nonsense!" The tone is passionate and decidedly oppositional.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-20
Draft law amending the Law on Preventing Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing (640 SE) - First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

Employs questioning as the primary element of the rhetorical strategy. The tone is polite and constructive, using the address forms "Dear Chairman" and "Dear Minister." It provides real-life examples (buying a phone with a loan, opening an account) to illustrate abstract legal issues.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-20
Draft law amending the Credit and Electronic Money Institutions Act and the Payment and Settlement Systems Act (634 SE) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The approach used is polite and inquisitive, beginning with words of gratitude directed at the minister. The rhetoric leans toward questioning rather than asserting, focusing on obtaining practical examples and clarifications. The style is direct and specific, steering clear of complex political maneuvering.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-20
Draft law amending the Securities Market Act and, as a consequence, amending other laws (regulation of derivatives and repo transactions) - first reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

Uses a direct and specific questioning style, beginning politely ("Thank you, dear Chairman! Esteemed Minister!") but quickly getting straight to the point. The style is factual and demands clarification, free of emotional judgments.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-15
Draft law on harmonizing the State Budget Act with the Constitution of the Republic of Estonia (580 SE) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session

The text employs a direct and critical tone, combining fact-based arguments with emotional assessments. It repeatedly stresses core principles ("let's be honest," "I emphasize once again") and utilizes specific examples, such as the case involving the Kopli rescue team. The style is formal, yet clearly geared toward solving practical problems.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-15
Draft law amending the Nature Conservation Act, the Hunting Act, and the State Property Act (612 SE) – First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session

They employ a direct and confrontational approach, consistently posing pointed questions. Key phrases are repeated for emphasis ("clearly detrimental to the owner"), and the segment concludes with a rhetorical question that calls the government's credibility into doubt. The overall tone is critical and demanding.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-15
Draft law amending the general part of the Environmental Code Act and other laws (611 SE) - first reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session

Employs a sarcastic and ironic tone, especially in the phrase "the great victory of the Reform Party." The rhetoric is direct and confrontational, including personal attacks ("you can't say that while in charge here"). It combines fact-based arguments with emotional criticism.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-15
Draft law (610 SE) for amending the Nature Conservation Act and, in consequence, amending other laws (Nature assessment) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session

The speaker employs a questioning tactic to obtain clarification regarding the practical implementation of the law. Their style is direct and specific, focusing on explaining technical details rather than emotional or ideological arguments.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-14
Draft law amending the Electricity Market Act (556 SE) – third reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session

It uses an emotional and combative tone, combining it with specific data. It employs figurative comparisons ("take away the electricity from home for a week") and irony directed at the head of Elering. The overall tone is critical and direct, utilizing vernacular expressions ("for God's sake") and rhetorical questions to strengthen the argumentation.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-04-16
Draft law amending the Energy Sector Organisation Act (574 SE) – First Reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session

They employ direct and emotional rhetoric, often voicing "embarrassment" regarding their colleagues' lack of economic knowledge. They combine personal attacks with fact-based arguments, utilizing a colloquial style and irony. They provide real-life examples (such as the suggestion to live two days without electricity) and comparisons with other countries to reinforce their arguments.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-04-16
Draft Land Tax Act (582 SE) - First Reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session

The speaker employs an emotional and personal approach, drawing on examples from their own experiences with snow plowing and lawn mowing. Their style is confrontational and accusatory, repeatedly making claims about the government and officials' lack of understanding and their "lying." The rhetoric is populist, emphasizing the protection of "ordinary people" against those in power.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-04-16
Second reading of the draft law amending the Tobacco Act (223 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session

He/She uses a personal and direct approach, starting by clarifying his/her own position. The rhetoric is pragmatic and experience-based, utilizing concrete examples and questions. The tone is constructive, yet critical—ending with an encouraging message to the commission ("Strength and success to the commission!").
View Profile View Agenda
2025-04-09
Continuation of the first reading of the draft law on declaring the Motor Vehicle Tax Act invalid (592 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session

The speaker uses rhetorical questions and irony ("oh, what a surprise!") to emphasize their points. The style is rather confrontational and emotional, employing both logical arguments and appeals based on values. They combine data with emotional claims, such as "the third child is already too much."
View Profile View Agenda
2025-04-08
Draft law repealing the Motor Vehicle Tax Act (571 SE) – First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

Uses an emotional and combative tone, combining personal stories with specific data. It employs direct accusations ("large-scale deception of voters," "extremely stupid and unjust") and rhetorical questions. It concludes with a personal appeal to the members of the Riigikogu, urging them to "decide bravely" and "think for themselves."
View Profile View Agenda
2025-02-19
Energy price

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th sitting, information briefing

The rhetoric is direct and confrontational, repeatedly employing the rhetorically accusatory question, "Are you satisfied...?" The style is factual and data-driven, yet simultaneously emotionally charged, emphasizing the suffering of "Estonian people and businesses."
View Profile View Agenda
2025-02-19
Energetics

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th sitting, information briefing

They employ an analytical approach focused on factual questions, presenting specific numbers and data. The style is direct and critical, but not aggressive—it focuses on substantive criticism of policy. They consistently repeat unanswered questions, demonstrating persistence in returning to important issues.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-02-17
Inquiry Regarding the Impact of Elron Ticket Price Increases on Regional Policy (No. 708)

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session

Adopts a collaborative and respectful tone ("Dear Chairman! Esteemed Minister!"), while maintaining a critical approach. The speaker relies heavily on personal experiences and concrete examples, blending emotional and logical arguments. They utilize historical parallels and detailed explanations to substantiate their views, all the while preserving a desire for constructive dialogue.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-02-17
Inquiry Regarding Regional Representatives (no 706)

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session

The speaker employs a personal and collaborative tone, starting with words of thanks and emphasizing a shared experience with the minister ("It's a little easier for Helir and me to speak here"). He/She combines practical examples with emotional appeals, using direct and sometimes critical language, but maintains a constructive approach.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-02-17
Inquiry Regarding Plans for the Construction of a Wind Farm on Saaremaa (No. 680)

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session

The speaker employs a direct and confrontational tone, beginning the address with a reference to "small and big lies." They rely heavily on numerical data and facts to substantiate their arguments. Rhetorical questions are used to engage the audience, and practical examples from daily life are highlighted (the light bulb in the ceiling, electric heating). The speeches conclude with a firm message that leaves a clear impression of the speaker's political stance.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-02-17
Investigation into the failure of the education agreement (no 704)

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session

The tone is critical and at times sarcastic, especially concerning Eesti 200 ("It is, of course, sad to acknowledge that, in the view of Eesti 200, Tallinn constitutes the entirety of Estonia"). He/She uses rhetorical questions and personal experience (listening to a radio interview) to reinforce the argument. The piece concludes with an unfinished thought, suggesting an emotional position.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-02-17
Inquiry regarding the merging of schools for children with special educational needs (no 684)

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session

The speaker employs a personal and emotional approach, highlighting their connection to the school ("in this yard where I have lived since university"). Their style is straightforward and practically focused, combining personal anecdotes with factual data. The tone is concerned yet constructive, seeking solutions instead of assigning blame.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-02-12
A written request for a vote of no confidence in Prime Minister Kristen Michal, submitted by 29 members of the Riigikogu.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The speaking style is data-driven and confrontational, centering on specific figures and evidence. The speaker poses direct questions to the Prime Minister and demands clarification regarding the underlying calculations. The style remains formal yet provocative, highlighting the discrepancies between the Prime Minister's assertions and the factual data.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-01-29
Elektrilevi's operations

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th sitting, information briefing

The speaker adopts a direct and confrontational approach when posing questions, grounding their arguments in journalistic citations and concrete facts (193 kilometers of cable). The rhetoric is accusatory and demanding, drawing comparisons regarding the differential treatment of private businesses versus state-owned enterprises. The tone of the speech is critical and requires clear answers concerning the inconsistencies.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-01-22
Continuation of the first reading of the draft law declaring the Motor Vehicle Tax Act invalid (538 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session.

Uses combative, emotional rhetoric directed against the ruling coalition. It relies heavily on specific numbers and facts, but presents them in the form of sharp criticism. It often uses personal examples and colloquial expressions ("I'll draw you a picture") to make complex economic issues more understandable. The tone is consistently oppositional and accusatory.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-01-21
Draft law on declaring the Motor Vehicle Tax Act invalid (538 SE) - First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session

The speaker employs combative and emotional rhetoric, blending references to common-sense wisdom (like the "foolproof cure: a sober mind") with sharp accusations leveled at the government. The style is populist, utilizing concrete examples (such as a 900-euro car tax bill for a family with six children) and metaphors ("tax hikes are a good disease"). The speech itself is lengthy and detailed, incorporating numerical data and factual references to specific legislation.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-01-21
Draft law amending the Act on the Implementation of the Common Agricultural Policy of the European Union and the Feed Act (546 SE) – Second Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session

The speaker employs a direct and critical tone, combining technical arguments with emotional assessments. He concludes his speech by claiming that the draft bill was "simply pulled out of thin air by officials," which demonstrates his combative and occasionally sarcastic approach.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-01-21
First reading of the draft resolution of the Riigikogu "Submitting a proposal to the Government of the Republic for the procurement of ammunition with a cost of 1.6 billion euros for the years 2025–2028" (540 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session

He/She employs a direct, question-driven approach, directing a specific question toward the presenter. The rhetoric is practical and concerned, emphasizing the possibility of a "bad scenario" and the necessity of delivering the "first strike."
View Profile View Agenda
2024-12-18
Third reading of the draft law amending the Act on the Status of a Member of the Riigikogu (545 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The speaker uses a direct and critical tone, calling for honesty and transparency. They combine a supportive attitude toward the draft bill with sharp criticism directed at the initiators and the government. The rhetoric is factual and detailed, utilizing specific figures and budgetary examples to support their arguments.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-12-17
Draft law on aligning the State Budget Act with the Constitution of the Republic of Estonia (525 SE) – First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

The speaking style is direct and emotional, utilizing colloquial expressions such as "a barrel of laughs" and "my dear friends." He combines fact-based arguments with personal experiences gained while serving on the finance committee. The style is confrontational, but it also includes appreciative remarks about colleagues (Mart Võrklaev). The speaker uses rhetorical questions and irony to reinforce their message.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-12-11
Draft law amending the Accounting Act and, as a consequence, amending other laws (516 SE) - second reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

The speaker employs emotional and confrontational rhetoric, combining it with specific facts. They use direct address ("Pals!"), irony, and personal attacks, particularly aimed at Eesti 200. The style is informal, featuring many colloquialisms, and is designed to undermine the credibility of political opponents.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-12-11
Third reading of the draft law on the 2025 state budget (513 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

Uses a questioning format to deliver criticism, which makes the rhetoric firm but not overtly aggressive. The speaker highlights specific contradictions and figures, thereby constructing a logical argument. The style is fact-based and analytical, yet it also contains an emotional element when addressing issues related to citizen welfare.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-12-11
Third reading of the draft law on the security tax (512 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

Uses emotionally charged and accusatory rhetoric, calling the law a "deceitful bill" and a "tax on fleecing the poorest." It relies heavily on numerical arguments, but presents them in a dramatic fashion. It concludes with a party slogan emphasizing the necessity of Isamaa coming to power.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-12-11
Draft law amending the Alcohol, Tobacco, Fuel and Electricity Excise Tax Act and other laws (510 SE) - Third Reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

The tone is sharp and emotional, employing sarcasm and irony ("oh, what a surprise, the Social Democrats get what they want as well"). The rhetoric is highly confrontational, including direct accusations and derogatory phrases such as "social democratic lie" and "nightmare." Emotional appeals are used, referencing the inability to buy Christmas presents and the hardships faced by families.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-12-05
Draft law (534 SE) on Estonia’s accession to the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child concerning procedures for complaints

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session.

They employ an emotional and confrontational approach, starting with the apology, "it's embarrassing to listen to." They rely on listing facts and specific examples, but present them in an accusatory tone. The approach concludes with a call for honesty ("Let's talk about this honestly"), which underscores moral superiority.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-12-05
Second reading of the Basic Education Act bill (419 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting

The speaker employs emotional and direct rhetoric, saying things like, "this is absolutely incredible" and "this bill is, frankly, the worst in Europe." They use irony ("To put it flippantly") and rhetorical questions ("What are they guilty of?"). The style is rather colloquial and easy to grasp, utilizing everyday expressions and emotional assessments alongside the facts.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-12-04
Second reading of the draft law on the security tax (512 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting

Uses confrontational and emotional rhetoric, labeling the coalition's actions as "embarrassing" and "unbelievable." Combines specific figures with strong criticism, employing irony and sarcasm ("a very good partner, always smiling, but voting the wrong way"). Addresses the audience directly with explanations and utilizes rhetorical questions to maximize impact.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-12-04
Second reading of the draft law amending the Alcohol, Tobacco, Fuel and Electricity Excise Tax Act and other laws (510 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting

The speaking style is emotional and dramatic, utilizing phrases such as "It is sad!" and "to sink Estonia as low as possible." He/She combines emotional appeals with factual data, drawing on personal experiences and historical examples. The style is direct and confrontational, yet simultaneously well-reasoned and structured.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-12-04
Reasonably priced electricity

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, press briefing

Adopts a direct and demanding tone, posing specific questions and expecting clear answers. Relies on facts and concrete examples, avoiding emotional rhetoric. Repeats their questions if a satisfactory answer is not received, demonstrating persistence and resolve.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-21
Second reading of the bill amending the Income Tax Act and the Defence Service Act, and the bill amending the Income Tax Act (509 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

They employ emotional and confrontational rhetoric, blending personal attacks with fact-based arguments. The approach is dramatic and accusatory, utilizing phrases such as "coming in through the back door" and "making laws for one person." They introduce historical comparisons and personal experiences to reinforce their viewpoints.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-21
Draft law amending the Simplified Taxation Act for Entrepreneurs and the Tax Procedure Act (463 SE) – Second Reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

It uses an informal, conversational tone ("Maybe you could tell us in a few words"), which is friendly and engaging. The rhetoric is more questioning and deliberative than categorically assertive, seeking clarification and confirmation of its own understandings.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-21
Draft law (447 SE) for amending the Education Act of the Republic of Estonia and amending other laws accordingly (establishing compulsory schooling) – Second Reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The speaker employs an emotional and direct communication style, blending irony (such as calling people "pals" or a "tough guy") with arguments grounded in facts. They utilize conversational language and rhetorical questions to underscore their points. Specific examples and personal experiences are introduced to lend greater credibility to their arguments. While the criticism is sharp, the speaker strives to maintain a constructive tone, encouraging the audience to think deeply about the issues.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-20
Draft law amending the Act on the Government of the Republic and amending other acts related thereto (505 SE) - Second Reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

It uses a direct and clarifying tone, starting with the emotional expression, "Now something is seriously messed up." The rhetoric is rather didactic, attempting to clarify procedural issues. In the second address, it employs an interrogative approach, which demonstrates interest in the other party's knowledge.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-20
Draft law amending the Constitution of the Republic of Estonia (527 SE) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The speaking style is direct and confrontational, utilizing rhetorical questions and personal challenges. The tone is critical and demanding, combining emotional arguments (such as the fear of losing freedom) with rational considerations. Historical parallels and personal experience are employed to strengthen the arguments.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-20
Third reading of the draft law amending the Social Welfare Act (pensioner support) (508 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

It employs heavily emotional and accusatory rhetoric, combining it with concrete facts and figures. The tone is combative and critical, utilizing rhetorical questions ("What has this price done?") and a moral framework ("attacking the weakest"). It concludes with a personal appeal to parents and grandparents, emphasizing the emotional impact.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-20
Draft law amending the Family Benefits Act and other laws (507 SE) - third reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The speaking style adopted at the podium is emotional and confrontational, kicking off immediately by pointing out the poor attendance of coalition politicians. The rhetoric is heavily accusatory, featuring the phrase ("taking away from the weakest"), and employs rhetorical questions to bring the coalition's inconsistencies to the fore. The overall style is direct and populist, focusing heavily on the worries of ordinary people.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-20
Infrastructure

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, press briefing.

The speaker employs fact-based and question-driven rhetoric, presenting specific figures and demanding clear answers. Their style is courteous yet consistently critical, utilizing precise references and logical arguments. The delivery is professional and controlled, focusing on both procedural and substantive matters.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-14
Draft law amending the Family Benefits Act and other laws (507 SE) – second reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.

The tone is sharp and confrontational, employing emotional arguments and direct accusations. The speaker demands answers to specific questions ("Tell me," "Why aren't we talking about this?") and utilizes rhetorical questions to exert pressure. The style is direct and provocative, steering clear of a diplomatic approach.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-13
Second reading of the draft law on the 2025 state budget (513 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.

The speaker employs highly combative and emotional rhetoric, repeatedly accusing the coalition of lying ("I haven't heard that many lies in 16 minutes before"). The style is direct and confrontational, utilizing irony ("although I don't understand how they got so smart—there aren't any actual business people in that bunch") and common folk wisdom ("the wise man learns from the mistakes of others, the fool from his own").
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-13
Draft law amending the 2024 State Budget Act (517 SE) – Second Reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.

It employs emotional and blunt rhetoric, including colloquial phrases ("we have so much money it’s killing us," "my butt seized up"). It combines personal experiences with concrete facts, using irony and sarcasm to criticize the government. The tone is combative and accusatory, but it relies on a factual basis.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-13
Draft law amending the State Budget Act (511 SE) - Second Reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.

The speaker employs emotional and confrontational rhetoric, labeling the budget a "nightmare" and accusing the government of "fooling" the public. To illustrate their arguments, they draw upon personal experiences (a drive from Tartu to Tallinn) and vivid analogies (a colorful cat that catches mice). The style is direct and critical, featuring rhetorical questions and irony.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-13
Energetics

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, information briefing

The speaking style is direct and fact-based, utilizing concrete examples and figures to support the arguments. The tone is critical yet constructive—the speaker offers alternatives to the solutions being criticized. The speaker employs a balanced approach, acknowledging both the problems and offering practical solutions, for instance, by stressing that they are not opposed to wind farms.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-06
Continuation of the first reading of the draft law repealing the Motor Vehicle Tax Act (488 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

Employs highly emotional and aggressive rhetoric, labeling opposing bills as "stupid." The approach is populist, utilizing relatable, common examples (a 1992 Audi, Kuldne Börs) and direct address. It is a blend of ironic humor and sharp criticism, also featuring personal attacks against political opponents.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-05
Draft law invalidating the Motor Vehicle Tax Act (488 SE) - First Reading

Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session

Uses a confrontational and accusatory tone, especially towards the Reform Party. The rhetoric is emotional and populist, employing the contrast of "poor versus rich" and posing rhetorical questions to undermine the opponent's position.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-05
Overview of the Government of the Republic’s Activities in the Implementation of European Union Policy

Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session

It employs a direct and interrogative approach, posing specific questions to the responsible officials. The tone is polite yet critical, utilizing formal address such as "esteemed chairman" and "dear Prime Minister." The argumentation is fact-based, relying on numerical data and concrete examples. The style is practical and economy-centric.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-10-23
A written request for a vote of no confidence in Finance Minister Jürgen Ligi, submitted by 29 members of the Riigikogu.

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session

The speaking style is direct and confrontational, yet polite. He/She uses rhetorical questions ("Is the Interior Minister lying, or were you mistaken?") and structured argumentation. The style is formal, but it also includes personal addresses directed at the minister.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-10-23
Minister of the Interior's political statement on internal security

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session

The tone is direct and demanding, using emotionally charged phrases such as "with a loud and clear voice." The rhetoric is confrontational, posing direct questions about the positions of the minister and the Social Democrats. The argumentation relies on specific examples and numerical data.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-10-16
Draft law on the 2025 state budget (513 SE) - first reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The speaker uses a combative and accusatory tone, combining emotional phrases ("the dark and shady budget") with fact-based arguments. He/She employs rhetorical questions and irony, especially when discussing "pork-barrel funding" and the political game. The style is direct and confrontational, yet it is supported by concrete data and detailed analysis.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-10-16
Draft Security Tax Act (512 SE) – First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

Adopts a direct and confrontational approach, demanding "honest answers" from the ministers and accusing the government of lying. Presents emotional examples (the plight of pensioners, economic hardship) alongside factual data. The rhetoric is passionate and accusatory, employing phrases such as "the lying bill" and "without mincing words."
View Profile View Agenda
2024-10-16
Draft law amending the State Budget Act (511 SE) - First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The speaker adopts a confrontational and accusatory tone, combining emotional claims with concrete facts. They use rhetorical questions ("Is this the kind of state budget we want?") and personal examples, including references to Facebook posts and their own experiences. The style is straightforward and critical, incorporating irony and sarcasm regarding the government's actions.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-10-16
Draft law amending the Prison Law (506 SE) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The speaking style is direct and confrontational, employing rhetorical questions and repetitions to highlight contradictions. He/She uses irony ("you talk a bit too much") and structured argumentation, presenting clear contrasts. The style is more emotional than dryly analytical, yet it is grounded in concrete facts.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-10-16
Electrical supply

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, press briefing

The speaker employs a factual and persuasive approach, relying on concrete numbers and examples. The style is polite yet firm, using questions to preempt counterarguments. They honestly acknowledge the limits of their knowledge ("I can't dispute that") and use diplomatic language ("supporters in the best sense of the word").
View Profile View Agenda
2024-10-15
Draft law amending the Alcohol, Tobacco, Fuel and Electricity Excise Tax Act and other laws (510 SE) – first reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session

Adopts a confrontational and emotional approach, accusing the minister of personal gain ("you bought a massive amount of canned goods before these taxes were implemented"). It combines fact-based arguments with rhetorical questions and employs irony and direct accusations aimed at the government.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-10-15
First reading of the draft law amending the Income Tax Act and the Defence Service Act, and the draft law amending the Income Tax Act (509 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session

It employs a direct and critical tone, combining emotional assessments ("to admit with sadness") with fact-based arguments. The rhetoric is confrontational, accusing the Reform Party of causing the economic decline and making poor decisions. It repeatedly uses specific numbers and dates to support its claims, thereby creating a strong fact-based narrative. It concludes with a constructive tone, calling for the submission of amendments.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-10-15
Draft law amending the 2024 State Budget Act (517 SE) – first reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session

The style of discourse is characterized by a polite yet direct questioning approach, utilizing the "modest question" as a rhetorical device. The style is fact-based and analytical, focusing on specific figures and documents. The tone is professional, but it contains veiled criticism delivered through the framing of the questions.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-10-14
Draft law amending the Act on the Government of the Republic and amending other laws thereof (505 SE) – First Reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting

The speaker uses questions and concrete examples (such as moving a computer from one room to another costing 1000 euros) to emphasize their viewpoints. The style is direct and practical, drawing on the entrepreneur's experience and using everyday analogies to clarify complex state budget issues.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-10-14
Draft law amending the Family Benefits Act and other laws (507 SE) – first reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting

The tone is critical and emotional, utilizing phrases such as "shearing" and "bullying." The speaker employs rhetorical questions ("Is that really what you want?") and concrete examples to strengthen their arguments. The style is straightforward and slightly confrontational, yet remains within the bounds of politeness.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-10-08
Draft law amending the Blood Act (476 SE) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

The speaker employs a direct and confrontational approach, often introducing questions with the phrase, "I ask directly and without mincing words." They combine fact-based arguments with emotional appeals, utilizing irony ("I always laugh") and rhetorical questions. The overall tone is critical and demanding, insisting on specific answers.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-09-24
Draft law amending the Simplified Taxation Act for Entrepreneurial Income and amending other acts in consequence (463 SE) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting

Uses a direct and critical approach, posing specific questions and demanding answers. Relies on facts and figures, but also expresses frustration ("nobody ever thought of this"). The rhetoric is more confrontational than conciliatory, employing rhetorical questions to call into question the viability of the draft bill.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-09-24
Draft law amending the Value Added Tax Act and the Tax Procedure Act (462 SE) - First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting

It utilizes an inquisitive and clarification-seeking approach. The style is direct and practical, focusing on specific examples and scenarios. The rhetoric is technical in nature rather than emotional.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-09-24
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Funded Pensions Act and Other Acts (464 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting

The speaker adopts a polite and constructive tone, starting with words of thanks ("Thank you, Mr. Chair! Thank you to the Minister for the insightful presentation!"). Their questions are specific and pertinent; they avoid confrontation but nonetheless express criticism regarding the preparation process of the draft bill.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-09-17
Report by the Chancellor of Justice on the compliance of legal instruments with the Constitution and the performance of other duties imposed on the Chancellor of Justice by law.

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

The speaking style is polite yet critical, beginning with expressions of gratitude directed toward the Chancellor of Justice and employing formal modes of address. Questions are posed rhetorically, seeking confirmation for the speaker's own positions, and concrete examples are used to illustrate the situation.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-07-29
Second Reading of the Bill to Amend the Income Tax Act (443 SE)

15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu

Uses emotional and combative rhetoric, calling the draft bill "ridiculous" and employing harsh expressions such as "enslavement." Combines personal experiences with factual data, citing examples from both local circumstances and national decisions. The tone of the speech is critical and sarcastic, especially toward the coalition, but it also includes constructive proposals.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-07-29
Second Reading of the Motor Vehicle Tax Bill (364 UA)

15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu

Uses emotionally charged and confrontational rhetoric, labeling decisions as "stupid" and support measures as "shameful." Employs rhetorical questions to strengthen the criticism ("Is this really all there is to it?"). Relies on specific examples from everyday life (the French Lyceum, the necessity of driving children to school) to create emotional impact. Utilizes comparative argumentation, citing examples of successful crisis policy from 2020.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-07-22
Granting Authorization to Prime Ministerial Candidate Kristen Michal to Form the Government

15th Riigikogu, Riigikogu's extraordinary session.

The style is polite and formal, utilizing traditional parliamentary addresses ("Good Speaker," "Esteemed Prime Ministerial Candidate"). The questions are direct and specific, yet presented modestly ("a modest question"). It relies on facts and external sources (Postimees).
View Profile View Agenda
2024-07-15
Reconsideration of the Motor Vehicle Tax Act (364 UA) left unpromulgated by the President of the Republic

15th Riigikogu, Extraordinary session of the Riigikogu

It uses an emotionally charged and combative tone, calling the tax hikes a "nightmare" and employing imagery like "springing up like mushrooms after the rain." It strongly appeals to public support, referencing 100,000 signatures and 20,000 votes. The rhetoric is populist, pitting "the people" against "today's coalition," and utilizing many emotional arguments alongside logical ones.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-06-19
Third Reading of the Bill Amending the Land Tax Act (437 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, extra plenary sitting

The speaker employs highly emotional and confrontational rhetoric, labeling opponents as liars and accusing them of criminal behavior. They utilize personal experiences and concrete examples (such as the snowplow at seven or mowing the lawn) to reinforce the argument. The tone is passionate and accusatory, repeatedly using phrases like "sad" and "hostile."
View Profile View Agenda
2024-06-12
Second reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Land Tax Act (437 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.

The speaker employs extremely emotional and confrontational rhetoric, repeatedly accusing the minister of lying. They use strong language, such as "criminal," "unbelievable," and "outrageous tax burden." Their style is direct and highly personalized, blending technical details with emotional evaluations and utilizing rhetorical questions to maximize impact.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-06-12
Second Reading of the Riigikogu Resolution "Supporting the Introduction of Nuclear Energy in Estonia" (431 OE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.

Uses a confrontational and accusatory tone, calling opponents "liars" and their decisions "foolishness." It poses many rhetorical questions and demands specific answers regarding the authorship of the draft bill. It combines emotional claims with factual data, utilizing direct and sometimes aggressive language.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-06-12
Third Reading of the Motor Vehicle Tax Bill (364 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.

The speaker employs highly emotional and dramatic rhetoric, kicking off the speech with a comparison to a mourning flag flown on Midsummer's Day. The style is aggressive and populist, utilizing phrases like "with a crunch" and "the steamroller is being deployed." He combines emotional appeals with factual assertions, creating a narrative that is perceptually impactful yet fundamentally critical.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-06-12
Overview of the Judicial Administration by Villu Kõve, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.

The tone of voice is emotionally charged and dramatic, utilizing strong expressions such as "people are killed off first" and "the person is essentially murdered." The style combines concrete facts with emotional impact, starting politely with an expression of gratitude, but becoming progressively more critical.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-06-05
Second reading of the Motor Vehicle Tax Bill (364 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

He employs an emotional and combative tone, combining it with specific figures and data. The rhetoric is direct and accusatory, utilizing phrases like "you stepped in it" and "come to your senses." Speeches often conclude with a direct appeal to voters to cast their ballots for Isamaa, which strongly indicates a campaign-focused approach.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-29
First reading of the Bill amending the Land Tax Act (437 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The speaker employs highly confrontational and emotional rhetoric, repeatedly accusing the minister and officials of outright lying. They use direct challenges ("read the bill thoroughly"), personal experiences, and specific examples to back up their arguments. The style is passionate and accusatory, also including apologies for the sharpness of their expressions.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-28
Second Reading of the Bill for the Amendment of the Income Tax Act (416 SE)

15th Riigikogu, third session, plenary session

Emotional and accusatory rhetoric, using personal examples (the car queue witnessed near the French Lyceum) and metaphors (the Prime Minister's visit to a pensioner's room). The tone is passionate and moralizing, concluding with a mark of shame regarding his/her Riigikogu membership.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-15
Second reading of the Draft Act amending the Building Code and other Acts (Acceleration of the Deployment of Renewable Energy) (308 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The speaking style is direct and emotional, using colloquial expressions such as "all that mess" and "they were fighting." He/She begins by correcting facts ("I must refute this right at the start") and uses concrete examples to support his/her claims. The style is a combination of technical expertise and populist rhetoric, emphasizing the protection of taxpayer interests.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-15
Measures to boost the economy

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, press briefing

They employ a sharp, accusatory tone, posing direct questions and demanding answers. The speaker relies on concrete facts and examples, quoting other politicians such as Tanel Kiik and Jürgen Ligi to substantiate their claims. The rhetoric is confrontational and systematic, consistently highlighting inconsistencies in the government's actions.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-13
Proposal by the Chancellor of Justice for bringing the Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Prevention Act, the Credit Institutions Act, the Law of Obligations Act, and the State Fees Act into conformity with the Constitution

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session

The speaker uses a polite and inquisitive tone, starting with expressions of gratitude and praising the presenter's topic. The rhetoric is question-oriented and constructive, focusing on finding practical solutions.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-04-30
First reading of the Bill amending the Income Tax Act (416 SE)

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session.

Employs emotionally charged and confrontational rhetoric, combining personal attacks ("you have a very difficult job") with concrete facts. The approach is dramatic and accusatory, repeatedly utilizing rhetorical questions and irony. The tone is passionate and accusatory, emphasizing the government's moral failings.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-04-18
Discussion of the matter of significant national importance, initiated by the Environmental Committee, titled "The necessity and possibilities of introducing nuclear energy in Estonia"

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The speaker employs a direct and fact-driven style, relying on concrete figures and historical examples. The rhetoric is critical and challenging, especially when discussing past political decisions and their consequences. They use practical examples (cold winter nights without electricity) to create emotional impact and conclude their speeches with clear questions or recommendations. The style is more confrontational than conciliatory.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-04-17
Second Reading of the Draft Act (344 SE) on the Amendment of the Riigikogu Election Act and Related Amendment of Other Acts

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The style of delivery is narrative and personal, incorporating concrete examples and anecdotes (Sinu Pubi, the nursing home incident). The tone is moderately critical yet constructive, balancing emotional appeals with logical arguments. The speaker employs rhetorical questions and repetition to underscore their viewpoints, all while maintaining politeness and collegiality.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-04-17
Security

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, information briefing

It employs a direct and concrete approach, posing a "simple question" and demanding a clear answer with a deadline (before Midsummer's Day). The rhetoric is factual and coercive, utilizing specific examples (Putin's election at the embassy) to generate emotional impact. The tone is demanding and blunt.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-04-17
Sugar tax

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, information briefing

Adopts a direct and confrontational approach, starting with a specific budgetary demand. The tone is critical and questioning, employing rhetorical questions and irony. It combines fact-based arguments with emotional appeals, referencing citizens' concerns.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-04-16
The Minister of Culture's 2024 Report on the Implementation of the State's Long-Term Development Strategy "Estonia 2035" (including the implementation of the "Estonian Sports Policy Fundamentals until 2030")

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

It uses the form of questions and specific examples to highlight the contradiction between state policy and the actual situation. The tone is polite, yet critical, relying on facts and logical arguments.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-04-10
State Budget Revenues and Expenditures

15th Estonian Parliament, third sitting, information briefing

They use a constructive, yet critical tone, blending fact-based arguments with emotional assessments ("it is extremely sad to hear"). Questions are posed systematically and consistently, utilizing concrete examples and figures to back up their viewpoints. They strive to maintain a collaborative approach, emphasizing "common goals."
View Profile View Agenda
2024-04-09
First Reading of the Crypto-Asset Market Act Bill (398 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

He employs a direct and genuinely acknowledging style, admitting the limits of his knowledge concerning cryptocurrency. He combines personal experience gained from his work on the finance committee with fact-based arguments. He uses irony and figurative expressions ("with one hand we give momentum, and with the other, we do everything to ensure there are few of them").
View Profile View Agenda
2024-04-09
First Reading of the Draft Law on Debt Collectors and Debt Purchasers (376 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

Employs straightforward and practical rhetoric, combining fact-based arguments with personal experience as an entrepreneur. Poses rhetorical questions ("who are we actually protecting now?") and uses irony to highlight the contradictions in the law. Maintains courtesy, but expresses clear criticism of the current approach, concluding with a constructive recommendation for the commission.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-04-09
Report by the Minister of Economic Affairs and Information Technology on the implementation of the state's long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035"

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

Uses a direct and confrontational tone, opening speeches by expressing disappointment ("I certainly hoped," "I must sadly admit"). It combines emotional assessments with fact-based arguments, repeatedly employing rhetorical questions to highlight the system's deficiencies. The speeches conclude with ironic remarks, such as a reference to "going to a party" (pitt) and the absence of PowerPoint.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-04-02
First Reading of the Bill for the Amendment of the Food Act (378 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting

The speaking style is direct and inquisitive, utilizing simple analogies and everyday language to clarify technical subjects. The speaker openly admits their confusion ("Every answer just makes things more confusing") and employs rhetorical questions to demand clarity regarding the minister's responses.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-04-02
First reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic to Abandon the Imposition of the Car Tax and Withdraw the Motor Vehicle Tax Bill from the Riigikogu Proceedings" (374 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting

The speaker employs an emotional and accusatory tone, labeling the government's actions as "lying" and a "steamroller approach" (or "railroading tactic"). They lean heavily on numerical data and concrete examples to substantiate their claims. Rhetorical questions and personal experiences are utilized to reinforce the argument, particularly when discussing the issues facing rural areas and the plight of families.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-03-20
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amending the Atmospheric Air Protection Act (393 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

They employ an emotional and direct communication style, including humor (the example of Kalevipoeg and the stone throw) and personal experiences. They frequently use rhetorical questions and urge colleagues to gain practical experience ("drive at least 50 kilometers outside of Tallinn"). They combine fact-based arguments with emotional appeals, using concrete examples drawn from daily life in rural areas.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-03-20
They are lying with unbelievable brazenness! Why?

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, press briefing.

It uses a direct and questioning approach, starting with an expression of gratitude, but quickly moving on to critical questions. It relies on logical arguments and concrete examples, employing rhetorical questions to challenge the direction of the policy.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-03-20
Environmental Friendliness and Taxes

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, press briefing.

The subject uses fact-based yet emotionally charged rhetoric, combining technical details with personal experience. They present concrete examples and historical facts, occasionally employing irony ("a pretty good business project"). The tone is demanding and critical, yet remains polite and constructive, focusing on finding solutions rather than merely assigning blame.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-03-20
Car Tax

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, press briefing.

The style is direct and personal, using the informal 'you' and offering direct dialogue. The tone is critical, but not hostile—rather, it is constructive, offering concrete solutions and expressing a readiness to provide further clarification.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-03-19
First Reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic for Improving Teachers' Working Conditions" (373 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

Uses personal experiences (three daughters in university simultaneously) to strengthen arguments. The rhetoric is confident and defensively proud of their party's achievements. Poses direct questions to opponents, attempting to pressure them into providing specific answers.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-03-19
The 2024 Report by the Minister of Health on the implementation of the state's long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035"

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

Uses a direct and emotional approach, combining personal examples ("I have also been a much heavier-set boy") with specific figures. The rhetoric is confrontational toward the government but constructive when offering solutions. It emphasizes practical examples and experiences instead of theoretical discussions.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-03-06
First reading of the Bill (359 SE) for the Act supplementing the Act on the Organization of the Energy Sector and the Act on Environmental Impact Assessment and Environmental Management System

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

They use a direct and emotional speaking style, often employing rhetorical questions and colloquialisms like "what the hell is this mess." They rely on facts and specific figures, but present them passionately and with a critical edge. They use comparisons and practical examples to illustrate their viewpoints, such as comparing cable repair to fixing a gas pipeline.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-03-06
Spreading misinformation

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, press briefing

He uses a direct and pragmatic approach, combining technical explanations with emotional appeals. The rhetoric is argumentative and persuasive, utilizing figurative expressions such as "banging one's fist on the table," along with comparisons between repairing an electrical cable and a gas pipeline.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-03-06
Availability of electricity

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, press briefing

It employs a question-driven, critical, and fact-based approach. It relies heavily on numerical arguments and comparisons (e.g., the repair of the Balticconnector versus the repair of Estlink). The tone is concerned and accusatory, yet remains constructive by offering specific solutions. Rhetorical questions are used to clarify responsibility.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-03-05
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Organization of the Energy Sector Act and Other Acts (Bill 356 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The tone is direct and confrontational, frequently opening with phrases such as "let's be honest" and "believe it or not." It combines emotional claims with concrete data, utilizing rhetorical questions and personal accusations. The style leans populist and is critically directed toward the government's actions.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-03-05
First reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Recall of a member of the Supervisory Board of the State Forest Management Centre and appointment of a new member" (386 OE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session

Adopting a polite and inquisitive approach, the speaker begins with an apology for any potential hearing difficulty. They pose structured questions, seeking clarity on conflicting information, and maintain a tone that is direct yet diplomatic.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-02-15
Debate on the matter of national importance initiated by the Isamaa faction, titled "Estonia in Economic Recession. What is to be done?"

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

Uses an emotional and confrontational tone, combining personal attacks ("has never actually worked in the economy") with specific numerical facts. The rhetoric is direct and critical, employing colloquialisms ("crap," "screwing things up") and emphasizing their practical experience in business as a counterpoint to "chair warmers."
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-23
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Income Tax Act (345 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The speaking style is emotional and confrontational, employing strong language such as "stupid decisions" and "it's a shame that we've had ministers like that in government." It combines fact-based arguments with personal attacks, utilizing rhetorical questions to pressure opponents. The tone of the speech is passionate and at times accusatory, particularly when criticizing the government's economic policy, yet the arguments are supported by specific examples and figures.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-23
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Medicines Act (Bill 162 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The speaker's delivery is personal and emotional, utilizing family members (spouse, mother, grandchildren) as examples to back up their claims. The style is direct and somewhat anxious, incorporating practical comparisons (such as buying fuel in Latvia) to illustrate the argument.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-22
Inquiry Regarding the Electricity Supply of Saaremaa (No. 68)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

He/She employs a direct and emotional approach, combining personal experiences with technical data. He/She emphasizes his/her views with phrases like "I say this loud and clear," and uses figurative expressions such as "getting a kick in the pants." He/She relies on both logical arguments and emotional appeals, especially when discussing the burdening of consumers with network fees.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-10
The economic situation

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing

The style is overtly confrontational and accusatory. The speaker employs a sharp tone, directly labeling the Prime Minister's assertions as lies and demanding the Speaker intervene to prevent the dissemination of falsehoods within the parliamentary chamber.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-08
Interpellation concerning the rise in costs (No. 354)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.

It uses an emotional and critical tone, combining personal experiences with specific data. It employs rhetorical questions and draws comparisons between private companies and state institutions. It concludes with a dramatic metaphor describing the economy as a train moving toward us, emphasizing the seriousness of the situation.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-08
Interpellation concerning the impact of the Green Transition on the administrative area of the ministry under your leadership (No. 341)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.

The speaker employs an emotional and critically charged style, labeling certain decisions as "madness" and "stupid." He/She combines technical facts with emotional assessments and draws on personal experience ("I must thank myself"). The rhetoric is direct and confrontational, especially when criticizing the government's energy policy.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-08
Inquiry Regarding the Threat to the Independence of Press Publications (No. 345)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.

The speaker employs direct and straightforward rhetoric, presenting a "simple question" and emphasizing specific figures. The style is fact-based rather than emotional, although a critical tone regarding the government's policies is evident. He/She uses personal experience (his/her status as a publication owner) to strengthen the argument.
View Profile View Agenda
Back to Profiling