By Agendas: Riina Solman

Total Agendas: 175

Fully Profiled: 175

All Categories Political Position Topic Expertise Rhetorical Style Activity Patterns Opposition Stance Collaboration Style Regional Focus Economic Views Social Issues Legislative Focus
2025-10-16
Debate on the nationally important issue "Why is food expensive?", initiated by the Estonian Centre Party faction.

XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting

Direct confrontation is not expressed. Instead, a question is raised concerning the narrow focus of the solution (the tax issue only). The criticism is directed toward the need to expand the political framework, not toward individuals or procedures.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-10-08
First reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Health Insurance Act and the Occupational Health and Safety Act (717 SE)

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The primary opposition is aimed at the minister and the initiators of the bill, criticizing the political decision regarding changes to benefits for pregnant women, which results in unequal treatment. The government's justification—fear of fraud risk—is criticized particularly intensely, being called hypocritical and poor form. They contrast the suspicion cast upon pregnant women with the failure to resolve the issue of parental benefit scheming.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-10-08
First Reading of the Bill (663 SE) on the Accession to the Convention Establishing the International Organization for Navigational Aids

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The criticism is aimed at previous political shortcomings concerning the creation of preferential conditions for operating under the Estonian flag, but specific opponents or groups are not named.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-10-08
2025 Report by the Minister of Social Affairs on the Implementation of the National Long-Term Development Strategy "Estonia 2035"

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The primary criticism is aimed at the political decisions of the governing coalition, specifically regarding the removal of family benefits, the introduction of the car tax and the related seizures (25,000 people's accounts), and the budget deficit of the Health Insurance Fund. The criticism is both policy- and procedure-based, calling the lack of health insurance for informal caregivers "a crime" and criticizing the establishment of the Ministry of Climate.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-10-07
First Reading of the 2026 State Budget Bill (737 SE)

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The main opposition is directed at the Minister of Finance and the government, who are being criticized both for procedural shortcomings (evading answers to questions) and for political decisions (planning a dangerous deficit budget). The criticism is intense and focuses on political accountability and the inefficient use of public funds.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-10-07
Interpellation regarding the organization of basic school final examinations and the continuation of studies in gymnasium (No. 801)

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The primary conflict is with the Minister of Education and their officials, who are heavily criticized for implementing changes without sufficient analysis or consideration of feedback. The criticism targets the poor quality of the policy and procedural unfairness (failure to count make-up exams, early closure of application acceptance). The Minister is to blame for failing to listen to educators and ignoring members of the Riigikogu.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-25
Debate on the key national issue "The impact of price rises on economic competitiveness and people's livelihoods: What to do?"

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session

The criticism targets the inaction or poor decisions made by the government or responsible parties, which have resulted in a drop in purchasing power. Specific opponents are not criticized by name; instead, reference is made to a systemic failure ("something is wrong with us"), using a comparison with Latvia and Lithuania.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-24
The Regional Affairs and Agricultural Minister's 2025 presentation on the implementation of the state's long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035"

Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.

No direct opposition is expressed, but the speaker raises skeptical questions about the feasibility of the minister's plans, especially regarding people returning to the countryside. The challenge is aimed at clarifying the details and effectiveness of the policy, not at personal criticism.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-17
Draft law amending the Family Benefits Act (659 SE) - first reading

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting.

Strong opposition to the Reform Party, which is considered the primary obstacle to developing a consensus population policy and is often referred to as the "snag" or "stump." [The opposition] criticizes the Reform Party for previously cutting family benefits and for their current desire to kill the pending bill, accusing them of breaking their word. The criticism is both policy- and value-based, accusing the opponent of sending hostile signals to families.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-16
The Chancellor of Justice's report on the conformity of legislative acts with the Constitution and the performance of other duties assigned to the Chancellor by law.

Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.

The criticism is directed at the Minister of the Interior and the security ministries, who put forward a "raw" draft bill intended to criminalize the tracking of terrorist propaganda. The opposition is based on both policy and procedural grounds, as the speaker assesses that the bill threatens freedom of expression and contradicts the protection of the interests of the Estonian state. The intensity of the criticism is moderate, while simultaneously acknowledging the ministry's goal of protecting the country.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-10
A written request for a vote of no confidence in Social Minister Karmen Joller, submitted by 21 members of the Riigikogu.

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session

The main opponent is Minister of Social Affairs Karmen Joller and, more broadly, the Reform Party, who stand accused of violating evidence-based standards and displaying political bias. The criticism is twofold: personal (involving insults and shaming on social media) and political (stemming from the lack of family policy measures in the 2026 budget). The attacks are intense, accusing the opposition of dishonesty.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-10
On the government's budget plans regarding stimulating the economy and people's purchasing power.

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, press briefing

The opposition is aimed at the government's tax policy and the inaction of the social ministers, particularly concerning the failure to utilize the budget surplus. Criticism targets both the political decisions and the ministers' rhetoric (Kristina Kallas's unparliamentary language). He/She demands that the Minister of Finance call his/her colleague (the Minister of Social Affairs) to order.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-09
The Minister of Defence's 2025 presentation on the implementation of the state's long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035"

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session.

The main confrontation is with the Minister of Defense, who is being criticized both for unfair salary policies and for evading questions before the Riigikogu. The criticism is intense and demands both political change (the salary model) and procedural correctness (answering the question asked, not what he himself wants to talk about).
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-04
Chair implementation

15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu

The primary targets are the government coalition led by the Reform Party and its ministers, particularly Signe Riisalo, who faces accusations of being hostile towards children and undermining the constitution. The criticism is both political (tax hikes, budget cuts) and personal/procedural (lying, poor political culture, unethical conduct within the nursing home sector). The attacks are intense, and there is no mention of any possibility of compromise.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-18
Third reading of the draft law on the state's supplementary budget for 2025 (651 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The opposition is directed at the government's actions (implicitly the Reform Party) and its potential use of state funding to purchase political loyalty. The criticism is both ethical and political, focusing on the lack of transparency and the potential bias of the Delfi Meedia group against the government’s political opponents.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-16
Investigation into the dissemination of misleading information to the public (no. 765)

XV Riigikogu, V Session, Plenary Sitting

The main criticism is aimed at former Minister of the Interior Lauri Läänemets, who is accused of exploiting the incident for political gain and orchestrating a political stunt. Criticism is also directed at the security structures, which allegedly knowingly disseminated false information and served as a tool for political technologists. Separately, the background of journalist Šumakov is being highlighted to cast doubt on his portrayal as a victim of national security.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-16
Draft law amending the Emergency Situations Act and other laws (662 SE) - first reading

XV Riigikogu, V Session, Plenary Sitting

The primary resistance is aimed at information warfare and the spreaders of disinformation, who are viewed as fearmongers of the populace and architects of systemic exclusion. Insistence, rather than outright political criticism, is being directed at the government, demanding improved measures for combating information warfare.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-16
Draft law amending the Waste Act and, in consequence, amending other laws (657 SE) – first reading

XV Riigikogu, V Session, Plenary Sitting

The main confrontation is directed at the Reform Party and the Prime Minister, whose earlier promises (such as ending the tax festival) are considered to be in direct conflict with the new legislative draft. The criticism is sharp and focuses on the negative economic and administrative impact of the policy, accusing the government of introducing new taxes and obligations.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-12
A written request for a vote of no confidence in Justice and Digital Minister Liisa-Ly Pakostale, submitted by 42 members of the Riigikogu.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The main opponent is Justice Minister Liisa-Ly Pakosta and the Reform Party, who are criticized for defending their coalition partners and directing accusations toward members of the opposition. The criticism is both political (failure to process competition law) and ethical/procedural (lying, evading responsibility, attacking someone who is absent). Compromise is ruled out; the focus is on demanding accountability.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-12
Second reading of the draft law amending the Health Services Organisation Act, the Unemployment Insurance Act, and other related acts, as well as amending the Act on Support for Working Capacity (604 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The criticism is aimed at the drafters of the bill and the Ministry of Social Affairs, as they have prioritized the acceptance of the end-of-life declaration ahead of the development of national guidelines and an action plan for palliative care. There is strong opposition to any further steps toward euthanasia and assisted suicide, which is viewed as a potential threat. The criticism is primarily procedural and ethical in nature.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-11
Foreign relations

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing.

The primary target is the Foreign Minister, who faces criticism regarding both political decisions (UN votes) and his personal and procedural conduct (arrogance, making false statements). The confrontation is intense and uncompromising, with accusations of demagoguery being leveled against the minister, and questions being raised as to whether his behavior constitutes defamation. Criticism is also aimed at the support provided to the Palestinian Authority, which is considered linked to a terrorist organization.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-10
The Chairman of the Supreme Court’s overview of court orders, the administration of justice, and the uniform application of laws.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.

The criticism is aimed at the deficiencies in the judicial system when handling family disputes, specifically its failure to adequately protect children. Also criticized are parents who use children for manipulation, as well as NGOs and social media platforms that undermine the court's authority in the public eye. The criticism addresses both procedural and ethical issues.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-09
Inquiry Regarding the Spread of Poverty in Estonia (No. 757)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The primary opponent is the Reform Party-led government and the prime minister, who stand accused of destroying the economy's competitiveness and degrading people's living standards. The criticism is policy-driven, focusing on tax hikes, the elimination of the tax exemption for land under one's home, and the unjust impact resulting from the abolition of the "tax hump." The opposition is intense and uncompromising, demanding the government's resignation and the calling of snap elections.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-05
Discussion of the significant national issue initiated by the Economics Committee: "How to increase productivity in the Estonian economy?"

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session.

There is no direct confrontation, but the criticism is aimed at the previous actions or conduct of the state and ministries, which are considered mistakes that require swift correction. The criticism is focused on improving the government's performance, not its complete rejection.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-04
Draft Law on Annulment of Excise Tax Increases on Energy Carriers (627 SE) - First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The main opponents are the government coalition and the Reform Party, both of whom are being criticized for tax hikes and the expensive plan to abolish the income tax bracket kink. The Prime Minister is directly accused of deceiving the public and engaging in information operations, which constitutes a strong attack on her personal credibility. A challenge is also being issued to the Social Democrat colleague, demanding that they stop defending the policies of the former government.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-04
Draft law amending the Public Health Act (617 SE) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The confrontation is aimed at coalition politicians who may not support the bill during the vote. The criticism is procedural, stemming from fears that an important issue will be shelved and the work carried out by officials will be ignored.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-04
Draft law amending the State Audit Act, the Political Parties Act, and other laws (control body for political party funding) – first reading.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The opposition is aimed at the coalition, who are being warned against derailing a good bill, with critics pointing to the coalition’s lack of accountability. Furthermore, the chair of the session is being criticized for procedural unfairness in closing the question period, with critics noting that other chairs handle similar situations differently. The criticism is based on both policy and procedure.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-03
The Minister of Public Administration's 2025 presentation on the implementation of the state's long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035"

Fifteenth Riigikogu, fifth session, plenary session

The primary criticism targets the strategic priorities of the Minister of Infrastructure and the Ministry of Climate, accusing them of neglecting rural roads. The objection is rooted in policy and procedure, demanding a clear timeline and the reallocation of resources. There is also criticism regarding the state's general reluctance to adequately fund the obligations of local governments.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-03
Inquiry Regarding the Pihlakodu Case and the Safety of Care Homes (no. 750)

15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session

The criticism is directed at the Ministry of Social Affairs and the Ministry of Justice because they have failed to provide clear answers regarding accountability and the prevention of hiring individuals with criminal records. The 2022 care reform and its funding model are also under fire, as the model favors the profits of administrative firms at the expense of affordability. The critique is both procedural and policy-based, demanding systemic changes.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-02
Inquiry regarding the school network (no. 760)

15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session

The main opponent is the government and the minister, who is being criticized for political inconsistency and mismanaging priorities. The criticism is intense, focusing on the opposition to the closure of Toila Gymnasium and comparing the government’s actions to a contrasting case in Pärnu County. The resistance is based on policy and procedure.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-02
Inquiry Regarding the Pihlakodu Case and the Prosecutor's Office Activities (no 748)

15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session

The primary criticism is aimed at the actions of the Minister of Justice and the Prosecutor's Office, reproaching them for passivity and an inability to identify organizational flaws. The solutions proposed by the Minister (criminal proceedings, civil claims) are deemed inadequate, as they only address the consequences, not prevention.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-15
The Minister of Education and Research's 2025 presentation on the implementation of the state's long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035"

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The primary opposition targets the education reform plans put forth by the minister and his ministry, particularly concerning the consolidation of schools on Hiiumaa. The criticism is rooted in both policy and procedure, raising suspicions about the lack of a legal basis and the complete disregard for the local community.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-14
Draft law amending the Act on Social Support for People with Disabilities and amending other acts in connection therewith (561 SE) – Second Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session

The primary criticism is aimed at the state and the government, who have neglected the special care sector and failed to prioritize this area. Criticism is also leveled at those who ignore the social sector and turn a blind eye to the problem. Furthermore, local municipalities are criticized for lacking the capacity or funding necessary to provide adequate support person services.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-12
Inquiry regarding coping policies (no 736)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.

The primary targets are the Reform Party-led government, Prime Minister Kristen Michal, and Minister of Social Affairs Joller. The criticism is intense, focusing both on the political substance (the tax hike/frenzy, budget cuts) and the government's operational style, specifically accusing them of demagoguery and outright lying. The minister is particularly sharply criticized for refusing to answer questions regarding tax increases, citing a lack of inter-ministerial cooperation.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-12
Hearing regarding the care reform (no 719)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.

The main criticism is directed at the coalition and the Ministry of Social Affairs, who consider the reform successful despite the failure to meet objectives and the existing quality problems. Criticism is also aimed at the profit-centricity of nursing home administrators, which has grown with the support of additional state funding, while caregivers' wages have increased only marginally. The opposition is policy- and procedure-based, demanding the dismantling and reassembly of the system.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-08
Implementation of the 2025 presentation of the Minister of Justice and Digital Transformation, "Fundamental Principles of Legislation Policy Until 2030"

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The criticism targets the legislative process and the state's failure to establish accountability, offering victims nothing more than an apology ("extremely sorry"). There is also opposition to the actions of care home directors who knowingly permitted unqualified staff to work. The criticism is procedural and policy-driven, focusing on the systemic failure.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-08
Implementation of the Minister of Justice and Digital Transformation's 2025 submission "Fundamental Principles of Criminal Policy until 2030"

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The criticism is directed at systemic deficiencies, particularly the contractual practices of welfare institutions and the moral implications arising from the Supreme Court's ruling. The intensity of the opposition is moderate, manifesting as questions and demands for clarification, rather than escalating into a direct attack.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-07
Draft law amending the Unemployment Insurance Act and, in consequence thereof, amending other laws (519 SE) – Second Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

Strong criticism has been leveled at the governing coalition (the initiators of the bill) for worsening the situation of the populace under the guise of "streamlining the system." Separately, the Social Democrats are criticized for their previous negligence (tax hikes, including the car tax) and their current opportunistic behavior while in opposition. The criticism is based on both policy (the base rate) and procedure (the involvement of interest groups).
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-05
Inquiry Regarding Rural Areas (no. 713)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The main opponents are the governing coalition, especially the Reform Party, who are accused of ignoring regional problems, as well as the Social Democrats and former minister Piret Hartman, who are accused of hypocrisy (their words were the exact opposite of their actions). Criticism is directed at political decisions (tax increases) and Finance Minister Jürgen Ligi, who is accused of "acting insolently" regarding the financing of local governments.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-05
Inquiry Regarding the Coping of Pensioners (No. 726)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The primary criticism is aimed at the government coalition and the Reform Party, accusing them of breaking promises (specifically, the tax-free average pension) and pushing the elderly into poverty through tax hikes. The criticism is also procedural, demanding accountability from ministers and substantive responses to parliamentary inquiries. Separately, Lauri Läänemets, the representative of the Social Democrats, is being criticized for his "irrelevant, uninformed, and sweeping criticism" regarding the Isamaa initiative.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-05
Inquiry regarding the social welfare reform (no 720)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The primary opposition is directed at the Reform Party, which is accused of exploiting the reform for personal gain and for the inhumanity of its market-economy approach. Criticism is also leveled at the Ministry of Social Affairs and former minister Signe Riisalo for their lack of accountability and for dumping problems onto local governments. The criticism is intense, addressing both political and ethical issues.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-04-24
Debate on the nationally significant issue "The Drawbacks of Wind Power," initiated by the faction of the Estonian Conservative People's Party.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The primary criticism is aimed at the government and the Ministry of Climate, accusing them of lacking a coherent energy strategy and engaging in contradictory actions that erode public confidence. Specific critical mention is made of the current prime minister and State Secretary Keit Kasemets, whose competence in energy matters is questioned, and who are accused of "aimless scrambling without a plan."
View Profile View Agenda
2025-04-23
Draft law amending the Health Services Organisation Act (advance directive of a patient’s end-of-life will) – first reading (604 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The opposition is aimed at the idealistic approach taken by the bill’s initiators and the ruling party’s assessment of society’s maturity, criticizing the absence of regulations and the role of the ambulance team leader during implementation. Criticism is also directed at the behavior of the State Chancellery employee, who snapped when questioned about the links to euthanasia.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-04-22
The Minister of Culture's 2025 presentation on the implementation of the state's long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035" (including the implementation of "The Fundamentals of Estonian Sports Policy until 2030")

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The speaker is in the role of the opposition, calling into question the ability of the government (which has been in power for two years) to deliver on its promises. The criticism is aimed at the political process and the minister’s capacity to successfully defend their priority during coalition negotiations.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-04-21
First reading of the draft resolution "Establishment of a Riigikogu investigative committee to examine the security of the Riigikogu e-election process" (576 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The confrontation is aimed at the bill's presenter, who is being criticized for bias and insufficient preparatory work. The speaker questions whether the presenter has communicated with the Election Commission to gain an overview of the deficiencies that have been rectified. The criticism is both procedural and substantive.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-04-16
Poverty

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing

The primary criticism is aimed at the Reform Party governments, who are accused of taking money from the public through tax increases and benefit cuts. The criticism is policy-driven and intense, accusing the government of deepening poverty and ignoring regional inequality. Furthermore, the current second pillar pension system is criticized, as it supports bank fund managers and foreign pensioners, rather than the Estonian economy.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-04-16
Considering the material from the Riigikogu budget control committee’s Monday discussion on price increases, Eurostat’s comparative data regarding price increases, the Institute for Economic Research’s latest barometer, the March Eurobarometer survey, and Isamaa’s recent proposals on how to mitigate inflation (reducing government spending with a negative supplementary budget and abolishing increases in indirect taxes – gas, petrol, electricity and diesel excise duties, and VAT – in the coming months), conclusions regarding government policy.

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing

The main criticism is directed at the government and the prime minister, focusing on political decisions such as raising taxes and breaking promises regarding the temporary nature of the value-added tax. The stance is intensely oppositional, accusing the government of ignoring poverty and regional decline, and demanding concrete solutions. The criticism is policy- and performance-based.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-04-15
The Ministry of Justice and Digital Transformation's 2025 presentation on the implementation of the state's long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035."

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.

Criticism is aimed at the implementation of the care reform, the excessive profits of service providers (e.g., Pihlakodu), and the decline in service quality. Additionally, the prosecutor's inappropriate choice of words regarding the abuse case is being criticized. The criticism targets the results of the policy and demands immediate oversight from the government.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-04-14
Inquiry Regarding the Continuation of Service as Prime Minister (No. 728)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The main opponent is the prime minister and the government, who are accused of publicly lying (regarding VAT and electricity prices) and improper conduct. The criticism is intense, focusing both on ethical shortcomings (such as the firing of honest officials) and failed policies (tax increases, the energy utopia). Opponents are also accused of seeking to ridicule or diminish the policies or politicians of another party.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-04-14
Inquiry regarding the energy sector (no. 724)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The main opponent is the Reform Party government and the prime minister, who stand accused of ignoring the public's livelihood problems and setting the wrong priorities (the environment before security and cost). The criticism is intense, ranging from political disagreements (such as energy policy) to personal accusations regarding attempts to belittle female politicians. The possibility of compromise is not mentioned; instead, a revision of the plans is demanded.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-04-10
The Chancellor of Justice's proposal to align the Motor Vehicle Tax Act and the Road Traffic Act with the Basic Law.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The criticism is directed at the previous government (including Prime Minister Kaja Kallas, the Minister of Finance, and the Minister of Social Protection), accusing them of ignoring the concerns of large families and failing to forward correspondence. The opposition is intense and focuses on procedural and political failures in the creation of exceptions. The Minister of Social Protection is criticized for directly refusing to discuss the exception with large families.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-04-08
Draft law amending the Securities Market Act and, in consequence thereof, amending other laws (588 SE) - first reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The opposition is directed at the Ministry of Social Affairs’ policy regarding gender quotas and gender self-determination. The criticism is sharp, including accusations concerning the former Minister of Social Protection’s plans and the alleged bullying behavior towards minorities (transgender individuals). They oppose the idea that social problems will resolve themselves without clear regulatory measures.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-03-26
Draft law amending the Church and Religious Communities Act (570 SE) – second reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The criticism is not aimed at specific adversaries, but rather at the potential dangers inherent in the draft law, which could lead to prosecutorial vexation and legal harassment. The opposition is focused on preventing the creation of ambiguous legal standards that might infringe upon religious freedom.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-03-26
Draft law amending the Constitution of the Republic of Estonia (536 SE) – Third Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The main criticism is aimed at colleagues belonging to the Centre Party, whose understanding of local government politics as merely utility policy the speaker resolutely refutes. The criticism targets the political mindset and the framing of the issue, accusing local governments of obstructing the transition to Estonian-language education.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-03-26
Integration of immigrants

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing

The main targets of criticism are Erkki Keldo, whose proposal to increase the quota is deemed illogical, and the Minister of Culture, who is being asked to provide explanations regarding integration and youth programs. The criticism is policy- and procedure-based, accusing the government of neglecting to bring its youth into the labor market and of insufficient integration.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-03-24
Draft law amending the Electricity Market Act (568 SE) - First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session.

The criticism targets politicians and decision-makers who ignore the advice of Estonian energy experts (e.g., Konist) and instead choose costly renewable energy solutions. There is strong opposition to the government’s narrative that wind energy will lead to a price decrease, which is deemed misleading.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-03-20
Draft law (583 SE) for the first reading regarding accession to the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women and approval of amendment to Article 20, paragraph 1, of the Convention.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The main backlash is directed at the minister and the government, who are being criticized for the poor timing of the draft bill and excessive bureaucracy. The criticism is both procedural and personal, accusing the minister of an arrogant style and ignoring the prime minister’s recommendation to show humility. The resistance is intense and has manifested in the situation being labeled "bizarre."
View Profile View Agenda
2025-03-20
First reading of the draft resolution of the Riigikogu, "Submitting a proposal to the Government of the Republic to close the temporary control line between the Republic of Estonia and the Russian Federation" (562 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The main opponents are the government and the Ministry of the Interior (specifically, former Minister of the Interior Läänemets and adviser Vootele Päi). The criticism is intense and targets political naivety, procedural stalling ("analyze and analyze again"), and the setting of personal priorities (vacations, a wedding in Nigeria). The government is accused of having a patronizing attitude and lulling the public into complacency, reminiscent of the trends seen during the Age of Silence.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-03-19
Third reading of the draft law amending the Family Benefits Act and other laws (547 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The main adversary is the government coalition, which is sharply criticized for political decisions that have damaged the economic situation of families with children. The criticism is policy-driven, focusing on tax hikes and cuts to family benefits, which deepen uncertainty and reduce the desire to have children. Particular criticism is directed at the cuts that were made "based on an Excel spreadsheet" and which affected the hobby group allowance for large families.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-03-17
Inquiry Regarding the Impact of Car Tax on Families with Children (No. 705)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The main opponent is the governing coalition, especially the Reform Party, which is being criticized for "forcefully pushing through" the car tax and ignoring public opinion (75,000 signatures). The criticism is policy- and procedure-based, accusing the government of cutting benefits for large families and lacking social justice in its tax policy. The Prime Minister is being urged to take real action, not just rely on the right rhetoric.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-03-17
Inquiry regarding the third year of record-low birth rates in Estonia (no. 703)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The main opponents are the Reform Party-led governments, former Prime Minister Kaja Kallas, and Minister of Social Protection Signe Riisalo. The criticism is intense, focusing on political decisions (the cutting of family benefits and the abolition of indexation) as well as procedural shortcomings (lack of focus, delaying a comprehensive analysis). The minister is accused of demagoguery and pitting large families against other families.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-03-11
The Prime Minister's address for 2025 on the implementation of the long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035" (including an overview of the situation of research and development activities and the government's policy in this area).

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The main opponents are the current government and the Reform Party, along with the previous government, all of whom are accused of causing burdensome tax hikes. The criticism is both political (concerning empty tax narratives and the lack of social policy) and personal/ethical, demanding the Prime Minister tell the truth and pointing to earlier dishonest behavior.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-02-27
A written request from 21 members of the Riigikogu expressing a vote of no confidence in Climate Minister Yoko Alender.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The primary confrontation is aimed at the Climate Minister and the processes under their leadership, particularly the lack of transparency and uncertainty surrounding the establishment of offshore wind farms. The criticism is heavily procedural and political, highlighting discrepancies regarding data sources (Aurora) and the management of the process (the unexpected halting). The opposition is intense because it is taking place in the context of a motion of no confidence.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-02-26
Draft law amending the Hunting Act (567 SE) – First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The opposition is aimed at the rapporteur and the ministry, criticizing their political consistency and the slow pace of the bill's advancement. The criticism focuses on the lack of results and the delay in ensuring security, demanding a specific timeline. Opponents (Raimond Kaljulaid, Kert Kingo) are being used as rhetorical reference points.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-02-25
Draft law amending the Constitution of the Republic of Estonia (536 SE) – second reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The main opponents are the Centre Party and the Social Democrats, who are criticized for acting on opportunistic motives regarding the issue of voting rights and for taking the Russian-speaking voter hostage. The opponents’ assertions about the destabilizing effect of revoking voting rights are dismissed as an outright lie and absurd. No willingness to compromise is shown; instead, there is a call to disregard the opponents’ arguments entirely.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-02-17
Inquiry Regarding the Estonian Academy of Arts' International Cooperation (no 677)

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session

The primary targets of criticism are Mart Kalm, the former rector of EKA, for his political decision, and the EKA leadership, which permits anti-Jewish sentiments and "selective humanity." The criticism is also procedural (a delay in responding to an an information request) and is directed at Foreign Minister Margus Tsahkna for siding with Palestine during UN votes.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-02-13
Draft Law Amending the Act on the Election of Municipal Councils (544 SE) – First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary meeting

The speaker strongly criticizes elements within both the opposition and the coalition for underestimating security threats, specifically calling Vadim Belobrovtsev naive. Priit Lomp faces criticism on both a personal and procedural level, accused of diverting funds intended for rescue teams toward the construction of a kindergarten in Kastre municipality—a maneuver labeled as "shady dealing." Criticism is also leveled at Liia Hänni, accompanied by the request that the defense of Estonia must remain the foremost priority.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-02-12
A written request for a vote of no confidence in Prime Minister Kristen Michal, submitted by 29 members of the Riigikogu.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The confrontation is directed against Prime Minister Kristen Michal and the coalition leaders, criticizing their decision-making process (deciding among three people, excluding parliament and the Minister of Finance) as undemocratic. The criticism is also leveled at the actions of the previous government (Kaja Kallas) for undermining family policy. The criticism is intense and focuses on both procedural and political errors.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-02-11
A debate on foreign policy initiated as a matter of significant national importance by the Foreign Affairs Committee.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The primary confrontation is directed at the Foreign Minister and the government’s overall policy, specifically citing the irresponsible dismissal of the consequences stemming from the UN vote. The criticism is substantive and intense, centering on the government’s failure to act when it comes to protecting young people online.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-01-30
Draft law amending § 5 of the Act on the Election of Municipal Councils (530 SE) – First Reading

Fifteenth Estonian Parliament, fifth session, plenary session.

Direct opposition to the draft bill is not expressed; rather, the rigid approach is indirectly criticized because it fails to take into account Estonian patriots who hold Russian or grey passports. The speaker draws attention to objections raised in the media (specifically on the ERR show "Impulss"), which recommend a more accommodating stance in politics.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-01-29
Draft law amending the Animal Husbandry Act (551 SE) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The opposition is directed at the actions of the government/minister, criticizing both the substance of the draft bill (additional bureaucracy) and procedural errors. The criticism focuses primarily on the fact that the organizers of horse competitions (the Equestrian Federation) and the Tori horse breeding farm were not informed about the new regulation. The opposition is based on policy and procedure.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-01-29
Draft law amending the Act on Social Support for People with Disabilities and amending other acts related thereto (561 SE) - first reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The opposition is aimed at the bill (561 SE) presented by the government and the actions of the minister, criticizing the policy implementation that deprives residents of rural areas of essential services. The criticism is policy-driven, focusing specifically on the negative repercussions of the bill for a vulnerable target group. A willingness to compromise is not apparent; instead, what is being demanded is a solution to regional inequality.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-01-29
Population policy

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th sitting, information briefing

The confrontation is aimed at the Ministry of Social Affairs and the Minister (Riisalo), criticizing the ideological foundation of their family policy and their procedural incompetence. The criticism is intense, accusing the government of achieving savings at the expense of families with children and disregarding the interests of the nation-state. Specific concern is also raised regarding the raising of the age limit for children with disabilities and the resulting reduction in associated benefits.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-01-28
Draft law amending the Aliens Act and, in consequence thereof, amending other laws (to enhance migration procedures) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The opposition is directed at the government’s (the Interior Minister’s) position that the control of illegal labor should rest solely on the shoulders of businesses. The criticism is policy-based and demands stricter state intervention, either through tightening requirements or conducting inspections.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-01-27
Inquiry regarding elementary school textbooks (no. 672)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The main criticism is aimed at the minister and the ministry, who are addressing the topic of gender identity and incorporating it into textbooks. The criticism is intense, accusing the ministry of "marketing" the subject and creating doubts about gender identity among young people. The opposition is both substantive and procedural (citing a lack of political debate).
View Profile View Agenda
2025-01-22
Draft law on accession to the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child concerning complaints procedures (534 SE) - second reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session.

No opposition is present; the speaker emphasizes that not a single amendment proposal regarding the draft bill was submitted by members of the Riigikogu, committees, or factions, which indicates widespread consensus on the matter under discussion.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-01-22
Continuation of the first reading of the draft law declaring the Motor Vehicle Tax Act invalid (538 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session.

The main confrontation is directed against the government, which is being criticized for imposing the car tax—a measure that has "generously dumped this burden onto families." The criticism is policy-based and intense, suggesting that families will have to wait for the government to fall before the situation can be resolved.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-01-21
First reading of the draft resolution of the Riigikogu "Submitting a proposal to the Government of the Republic for the procurement of ammunition with a cost of 1.6 billion euros for the years 2025–2028" (540 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session

The main opponent is the Reform Party and its leadership decisions concerning national defense, which are characterized as cronyism. The criticism is intense, accusing the coalition of ignoring the debate and disregarding the will of the people, as most coalition politicians walked out of the chamber.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-01-20
Inquiry regarding the promotion of family and large families (no. 667)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The criticism is directed at government ministers (both the minister concerned and the "neighboring minister") over a specific budget decision. The opposition is policy-based, focusing on the negative impact resulting from the withdrawal of support and the conflicting signals being sent by the state.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-01-16
Draft law amending the State Budget Act (520 SE) - First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The criticism is aimed at the behavior of the ruling coalition, accusing them of arrogance, employing "steamroller" tactics, and justifying their actions by labeling the opposition as incompetent. The criticism is procedural and ethical, rather than focused on the substance of the policy itself, and stresses that the coalition must also listen to the opposition.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-01-13
Request for information regarding the restoration and resilience plan and the use of oil shale (no. 668)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The confrontation is directed against the implementation of the plans put forward by the government (the Prime Minister and the Climate Minister). The criticism is policy-based, questioning both the financial foundation of the promises regarding cheaper renewable energy and the chosen location for the gas power plant. The government's ability to negotiate special conditions for oil shale within the European Union is also being criticized.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-12-18
Foreign policy

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, press briefing

The main opposition is aimed at the foreign minister and the government's foreign policy, criticizing specific political choices (UN votes) and the negative consequences thereof. The minister is accused of being directly responsible for the situation, specifically where antisemitism is spreading in universities and relations with allies have been harmed. The criticism is intense, being both policy-driven and results-oriented.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-12-16
Overview of the Implementation of the "Fundamental Principles of Law-Making Policy Until 2030" in 2023.

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

The main confrontation is aimed at the government and the Ministry of Justice, who are accused of breaking promises, implementing cuts without proper analysis, and causing legislative chaos. The criticism is intense, focusing both on political decisions (such as the removal of family benefits and the closure of the Jõhvi courthouse) and procedural shortcomings (lack of transparency and the exclusion of stakeholders). The government is accused of having completely undermined consistency and triggering a crisis of trust.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-12-16
Overview of the Implementation of the Fundamentals of Criminal Policy until 2030

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

The criticism is aimed at lower-tier government officials (referred to as "those making today's cuts"), who stand accused of ignoring regional policy and blindly following orders to implement budget cuts. The criticism is both procedural and political, highlighting the complete lack of analysis.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-12-12
Draft Law Amending the Act on the Government of the Republic (523 SE) – First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

The criticism targets the bill's initiators, who risk unintentionally increasing bureaucracy while ignoring the state's financial condition. The opposition is both procedural and fiscal, questioning the viability of the new monitoring system if its implementation necessitates hiring additional staff.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-12-11
Third Reading of the Draft Health Care Act (433 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

The criticism is aimed at the Ministry of Social Affairs, which, during the speaker's tenure as minister, exerted pressure to ease restrictions on gender reassignment, including eliminating the two-year waiting period. Separate criticism is leveled against the 2023 statement by Minister of Social Protection Signe Riisalo, which linked addressing issues of gender self-determination with cuts to family benefits. The criticism is intense and focuses on political coercion and procedural risk.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-12-11
Draft law amending the Child Protection Act and other laws (427 SE) – third reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

The main criticism is directed at the coalition, whose overwhelming majority of votes led to the rejection of Isamaa's amendments in the committee. The criticism is both policy-based and procedural, accusing the coalition of creating loopholes in the law and hiding the control mechanism from public scrutiny. The analysis provided by the law firm is also criticized for failing to address practical risks.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-12-11
Suffrage

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth session, press briefing.

The opposition's stance is directed at procedural errors and illegal attempts to add unconstitutional provisions concerning the creation of separate electoral lists to the explanatory memorandum. The criticism is aimed at those "fiery politicians" who tend to rewrite the law for their own benefit. Clarity is demanded regarding who is pushing this controversial aspect into the explanatory memorandum and why.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-12-09
Inquiries Regarding Estonia's Conduct at the United Nations General Assembly (no. 663)

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting

The primary confrontation is aimed at the Foreign Minister's actions and the government's foreign policy decisions, which are seen as being at odds with allies and creating insecurity for the Jewish community. The criticism is intense, focusing on both procedural errors (the failure to remain silent) and the resulting political damage.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-12-09
Request for Information Regarding the Government Commission's Activities on Population Policy (No. 661)

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting

The main opponents are the governments led by Kaja Kallas and the Reform Party, who are accused of showing hostility towards demographic policy and ignoring issues related to the birth rate. The criticism is sharp, focusing on broken political promises (the reduction of child allowances) and procedural failures (the closure of the special committee addressing the population crisis). The resistance regarding the reduction of benefits is intense and uncompromising.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-12-05
Draft law amending the Citizenship Act (522 SE) – First Reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session.

The main criticism is directed against the actions of the Minister of the Interior and the Ministry of the Interior, accusing them of relaxing the requirements for granting citizenship "at an accelerated pace." Opponents (the Social Democrats) are accused of ideologically corrupted thinking and attempting to generate new Russian-speaking voters for themselves, linking this to the ongoing dispute over the revocation of voting rights.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-12-05
Draft law (534 SE) on Estonia’s accession to the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child concerning procedures for complaints

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session.

The primary opposition in parliament originated with Kalle Grünthal, who expressed concern regarding hidden costs, the substantive meaning of the interpretation, and the transfer of responsibility to the UN. The co-rapporteur addresses this criticism by focusing on policy, explaining that the committee is professional, costs are restricted to outreach work, and the mechanism is framed by safeguards. Furthermore, the Minister's pessimistic rhetoric concerning the birth rate is criticized, with positive political solutions offered as a counterpoint.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-12-05
Second reading of the draft Health Care Services Act (433 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting

The confrontation is directed against the Ministry of Social Affairs and the government, who are accused of seeking to move the changes regarding the conditions for gender reassignment to the level of a regulation, thereby bypassing Riigikogu oversight and implementing a "turbo procedure." The criticism is both procedural and political, emphasizing that rushing the process could cause distress for many people.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-12-04
Draft law (447 SE) for amending the Education Act of the Republic of Estonia and amending other related laws (establishing the obligation to attend school) – third reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting

Criticism is directed at the government, specifically the Foreign Minister, regarding their actions in UN votes concerning Israel. The disagreement is political in nature, highlighting the government's failure to acknowledge terror victims and their suffering.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-12-04
Security

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, press briefing

The main targets are the Prime Minister and the Foreign Minister, who are being criticized for their lack of political accountability and for the shift in foreign policy direction. The criticism is sharp and personal, directly questioning the Prime Minister's sense of shame and his fear regarding the Foreign Minister's actions. Earlier remarks made by Finance Minister Jürgen Ligi concerning his manner of speech are also being indirectly criticized.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-12-04
The situation regarding the state's finances

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, press briefing

The main targets of criticism are the finance ministers (Keit Pentus-Rosimannus and Mart Võrklaev) and state institutions (the Environmental Board), all of whom are linked to the question of Eesti Energia's financial losses and accountability. The criticism is intense and focuses on political and financial responsibility, particularly Mart Võrklaev's assertion that the general assembly bears no responsibility.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-12-04
Values-based policy

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, press briefing

The opposition is targeting the government as a whole, the Minister of Foreign Affairs (over the UN votes), and the Ministers of Finance (Keit Pentus-Rosimannus, Mart Võrklaev) for their lack of accountability in the Eesti Energia derivatives scandal. The criticism is intense, accusing the government of a shift in values and unethical conduct (threatening a criminal investigation).
View Profile View Agenda
2024-12-03
Continuation of the second reading of the draft law amending the Child Protection Act and other laws (427 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The criticism is aimed at the coalition and the majority of the Social Affairs Committee, who rejected Isamaa’s "very reasonable" amendments. Opponents are accused of avoiding dialogue, rushing the process, and diminishing the role of the judiciary by moving assessments out of the public eye. The bill’s presenters (Eero and Madis Timpson) are also separately criticized for sidestepping questions.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-14
Second reading of the draft law amending the Social Welfare Act (pensioner support) (508 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.

The confrontation is intense and aimed squarely at the governing coalition and its leading party, who stand accused of constantly breaking their promises and sowing widespread uncertainty. The criticism targets both unethical behavior (cuts made at the expense of the vulnerable) and political failures (the breaking of promises regarding pension pillars and tax commitments). There is also opposition to the earlier policies of the Reform Party under Siim Kallas, which allegedly showed respect for pensions.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-14
Draft law amending the Family Benefits Act and other laws (507 SE) – second reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.

The main targets of criticism are the proponents of the government's policy and the draft law, who are accused of making savings at the expense of vulnerable groups. The criticism is policy-driven, accusing the government of engaging in wordplay and demagoguery, and of "insulting" families. The opposition is intense, demanding that the reading of the bill be suspended.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-13
Second reading of the draft law on the 2025 state budget (513 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.

The confrontation is aimed at the government's budget priorities, criticizing them for unethical cuts made at the expense of the most vulnerable target group, while noting that the cut itself is negligible considering the overall size of the state budget. He/She also criticizes the government's inaction regarding the funding of the Riigikogu (Parliament) administration and IT investments.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-11
Draft law on the partial repeal of the Value Added Tax Act Amendment Act (489 SE) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

Strong opposition to the current government coalition, accusing them of breaking their word and ramming through tax increases using the "steamroller" method. It criticizes the consequences of these policies, which make it impossible to become a homeowner. At the local level, the coalition partner (Pärtel-Peeter Pere) is criticized for accusations of wasteful spending (literally, "sowing money").
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-11
Draft law amending the Holiday and Commemoration Day Act (453 SE) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

The main criticism is directed against the government coalition, which is accused of superficially handling the draft bill and obstructing its progress. The coalition is also criticized for refusing to use the Ministry of Finance's mechanisms to commission the necessary impact analysis, instead leaving that obligation to the initiators of the bill.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-06
Draft law amending the Medicinal Products Act and the Act on the Organisation of Health Care Services (458 SE) - Third Reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The criticism is aimed at the state's actions and policies, accusing it of disrupting the market, engaging in illegal competition, and pursuing creeping nationalization. Specifically, the past unlawful activities of the Health Board and Tartu University Hospital in managing pharmaceutical supplies are being criticized. The attacks are policy- and procedure-based, leveling accusations of inefficiency and illegality against the state.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-06
Continuation of the first reading of the draft law repealing the Motor Vehicle Tax Act (488 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The main criticism is directed against the former finance ministers of the Reform Party, who are accused of evading questions and engaging in vague legislative drafting. The opposition is intense and focuses both on the substance of the policy (the car tax) and on procedural incompetence (the inability to explain the aims of the law, even to the President).
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-06
Suffrage

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, information briefing

The main confrontation is aimed at the governing coalition, particularly the Social Democrats, who are accused of holding the process hostage with a compromise proposal. The Prime Minister is being pressured, with demands for the Reform Party to take a clear stance, free of coalition commitments. The criticism targets political weakness and compromises on core values.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-04
Inquiry regarding the departure of state institutions from rural areas (no 653)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The main opponents are the government as a whole, specifically Regional Minister Piret Hartman and Minister of Social Protection Signe Riisalo, both of whom are accused of having a similar "signature style" when slashing support payments. The criticism focuses on political inconsistency and inaction, accusing the ministers of engaging in smoke and mirrors and dramatically exacerbating regional inequality. The opposition is intense and politically grounded, highlighting that the government’s actions are diametrically opposed to the minister’s stated principles.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-10-24
Draft law amending the State Duty Act and the Act on Narcotic and Psychotropic Substances and Their Precursor Substances (state duties in the health and social sphere) (502 SE) - first reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session

The criticism targets the expense of bureaucracy and the steep increase in state levies, signaling opposition to the government's administrative policy. The critique is political and procedural, calling into question the legitimacy of administrative costs, and is not personal.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-10-24
Draft law amending the Medicinal Products Act (501 SE) – First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session

The main opponents are the government (for rushing, lack of analysis, and the push toward state ownership) and the social democrat Tanel Kiik. Kiik is being accused of demagoguery and unfairly blaming Isamaa for obstructing the debate. The criticism is intense and focuses both on the political consequences and procedural errors.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-10-24
Draft law amending the Medicinal Products Act and the Act on the Organisation of Health Care Services (458 SE) – Second Reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session

The opposition is aimed at the rapporteur (Eero Merilind) and the committee's procedure, both of whom refused to answer publicly, citing only internal committee discussions. The criticism is twofold: procedural, demanding public answers, and substantive, questioning the rationale for the change and its economic impact on wholesale firms.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-10-24
Draft law amending the Medical Devices Act and, in consequence, amending other laws (granting competence to the Medicines Agency) (Bill 448 SE) – second reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session

There is no direct opposition to the substantive goal of the draft bill (the transfer of competence). Criticism is aimed at the terminological ambiguity and overly broad definition within the legislation, which is causing confusion. Specific opponents or groups are not named.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-10-23
A written request for a vote of no confidence in Finance Minister Jürgen Ligi, submitted by 29 members of the Riigikogu.

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session

The main opponent is Finance Minister Jürgen Ligi and the government, who are being criticized both for their political choices (the profit tax, uncontrolled energy policy) and their personal conduct (overconfidence, communication style). The criticism is intense, accusing the minister of ignoring proposals from entrepreneurs and allowing an unstable energy policy. They also recall the minister’s previous personal attack against the speaker, specifically when he called them a "sausage of lies."
View Profile View Agenda
2024-10-23
Minister of the Interior's political statement on internal security

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session

The main confrontation is between the Minister of the Interior and the Social Democrats, who are accused of ignoring security threats and engaging in diversionary tactics. Furthermore, the Reform Party is being criticized for personal attacks (Jürgen Ligi called someone a "liar sausage") and for the chauvinistic behavior of the session chairman when setting the order of speeches.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-10-21
Inquiry Regarding Tax Increases (No. 647)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The main opponent is the Minister of Finance and the government, who are being criticized both for procedural shortcomings (lack of impact analysis, rush job) and for political decisions (tax increases). The criticism is intense and includes personal attacks; for example, the minister is accused of demagoguery and of dividing questioners into "goats and sheep." The speaker condemns the government's message that disagreeing with the tax increases amounts to supporting Kremlin talking points.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-10-21
Inquiry Regarding the Care Reform (no 649)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The main confrontation is directed at the minister and the government, criticizing the failed implementation of the care reform and the minister's sidestepping of responsibility (the claim being that they cannot be held accountable for the private sector or local authorities). The criticism is policy-driven, focusing on the discrepancy between the promise and the reality, which is attributed to rising prices.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-10-21
Request for Information Regarding Prison Space Rental (no. 645)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The opposition is directed at the policy of the government (the minister), particularly concerning the placement of prisoners and the leasing out of prison spaces. The criticism is policy- and procedure-based, calling into question the suitability of the cost-saving measures from the standpoint of rehabilitation and reintegration.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-10-17
Draft law amending the Social Welfare Act (pension support) - first reading (508 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The main opponent is the government and the Reform Party, who are accused of breaking promises and maintaining a cynical attitude toward pensioners. Criticism targets both political decisions (cuts made at the expense of the most vulnerable) and ethical conduct (specifically, the accusation that ministers and Riigikogu members are receiving public funds intended for pensioners). No willingness to compromise has been expressed; instead, a proposal has been made to reject the draft bill entirely.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-10-17
Draft law amending the Social Welfare Act and the Value Added Tax Act (mental health services) – first reading (500 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The main criticism is directed at the government's tax policy, which creates a "tax cascade" and causes a loss of income, thereby exacerbating health problems. The budget is being called opaque. Although the policy directions of Social Protection Minister Signe Riisalo are generally under fire (especially the cuts affecting families), she is credited for proposing this specific type of support.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-10-16
Draft law on the 2025 state budget (513 SE) - first reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The main confrontation is directed against the policies of the minister and the government, criticizing both the budget cuts and the minister's personal conduct for the verbal attacks against female politicians (Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart, Moonika Helme). The cuts are deemed unfair, and their justification based on security is questioned, with critics ironically asking how much ammunition can actually be purchased with that money.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-10-14
Draft law amending the Act on the Government of the Republic and amending other laws thereof (505 SE) – First Reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting

Strong opposition to the government-backed bill, which is aimed squarely at the Minister of Justice and Digital Affairs. The criticism is directed primarily at ethical questions and the alleged personalized drafting of the legislation. Opponents are associated with supporting the aggressive green transition and the SALK think tank, which is linked to prohibited donations.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-10-14
Draft law amending the Family Benefits Act and other laws (507 SE) – first reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting

The main opponent is the government, which is criticized for procedural rushing and making cuts at the expense of the people, especially concerning the state budget procedure. The criticism is intense, accusing the government of breaking its word, engaging in "sleight of hand," and "adulterating" family policy. The government is accused of prioritizing Excel spreadsheets over people, and the Minister of Social Protection (Signe Riisalo) is accused of violating earlier promises.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-10-10
Draft law amending the Child Protection Act and other laws (427 SE) – second reading

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth sitting, plenary session.

The primary opposition is aimed at the bill's proponents and the coalition partners, who are being criticized for procedural errors and insufficient debate within the Social Affairs Committee. The criticism is intense and centers on both policy (the risk of pedophiles being employed) and procedural flaws, demanding only the termination of the bill's proceedings as a compromise.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-10-09
Draft resolution "Establishment of a working group to address the population crisis" (324 OE) – first reading

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth Session, Plenary Session.

The main opposition is directed at Kaja Kallas’s governments and the Minister of Social Protection, Signe Riisalo. The criticism is intense and policy-based, focusing on the abolition of the institution of the Minister of Population and the cutting of family benefits. The solution proposed by the government (controlled migration) is considered inadequate and unsatisfactory.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-09-25
The Regional Affairs and Agricultural Minister's 2024 presentation on the implementation of the state’s long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035"

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session

The main opponent is the government and the minister’s party, who are being criticized for tax hikes and budget cuts that undermine regional policy. The criticism is policy-driven and intense, demanding that the minister promise to put a "red light" on any further tax increases.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-09-23
First Reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic to Annul the Decision of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs Regarding the Closure of the Consulate General of the Republic of Estonia in New York" (328 OE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session

The primary adversary is the Foreign Minister, who faces criticism for his self-will, arrogance, and failure to heed the Riigikogu Foreign Affairs Committee. The criticism targets both the minister's conduct during the Q&A session and his political decisions, which diverge from the Committee's established viewpoints. The opposition is intense and calls for a fundamental change in the minister's approach.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-09-23
First Reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic to Move the Embassy of the Republic of Estonia in Israel from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem" (325 OE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session

The main criticism is directed at the actions of the Minister of Foreign Affairs and senior officials of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (the Secretary-General) concerning the provision of Estonia's voting instructions at the UN. The criticism is procedural and inquiry-based, seeking clarification regarding their considerations. Additionally, he mentions "certain circles" that stirred up a scandal over his activities in 2020.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-09-19
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Family Benefits Act (388 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The main opponent is Minister of Social Protection Signe Riisalo, who is sharply criticized for the destruction of family policy, breaking promises, and anti-family communication. The Reform Party is criticized for disregarding liberal values (freedom of choice). Prime Minister Kristen Michal’s start is considered promising, but his government’s actions concerning demographic issues are viewed as causing uncertainty.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-09-18
Policy pursued within the administrative domain

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, press briefing

The main opponent is the Minister of Social Protection and the government coalition, whose policies are sharply criticized for their neglect and for pitting families against each other. The criticism is directed both at a specific policy (the withdrawal of health insurance) and the communication style, accusing the minister of inciting hostility. The speaker asks whether the policy is a recommendation from the Ministry of Social Affairs or the Reform Party, thereby pointing to political responsibility.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-09-17
Report by the Chancellor of Justice on the compliance of legal instruments with the Constitution and the performance of other duties imposed on the Chancellor of Justice by law.

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

Direct opposition is not expressed, but criticism is aimed at the potential unfair conduct of politicians, requesting examples for self-improvement from the Chancellor of Justice. It is also hinted that there is a need to shine a spotlight on ministries and the internal conduct of state officials. The criticism is directed primarily at procedural and ethical behavior.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-09-16
First Reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "On the Development of Measures for Increasing the Birth Rate" (208 OE)

The 15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting.

The main opponent is Minister of Social Protection Signe Riisalo, who is sharply criticized for her political decisions (such as revoking health insurance and cutting family benefits) and her inappropriate rhetoric (including categorizing mothers as freeloaders and inciting class antagonism). The criticism also extends to the government's policy, which attempts to resolve the birth rate crisis through controlled migration. Opponents are being urged not to simply scrap the draft legislation, a stance that clearly demonstrates an unwillingness to compromise on this matter.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-09-16
2024 Report by the Minister of the Interior on the Implementation of the State's Long-Term Development Strategy "Estonia 2035"

The 15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting.

The primary criticism is aimed at Kaja Kallas's third government, which is accused of abandoning activities related to population policy. The criticism is policy-driven and intense, highlighting the dangers stemming from the government's inaction (mass immigration, issues faced by school operators, and internal security). Criticism is also directed at the minister, who is being pressured to take concrete steps to resolve the demographic crisis.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-09-11
First Reading of the Draft Act Amending the Waste Act (430 SE)

Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session

The primary criticism is aimed at the actions of the Ministry of Climate and the minister, citing a deficient stakeholder engagement process and an inadequate assessment of the bill's potential impacts. The criticism is both procedural and political, stressing that the minister placed excessive trust in the ministry's preliminary work. There is no talk of compromise; rather, critics are demanding a fundamental revision of the bill and renewed negotiations with interest groups.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-09-11
Minister of Defence's 2024 Report on the Implementation of the State's Long-Term Development Strategy "Estonia 2035"

Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session

The criticism targets the government's funding models and the inter-ministerial bureaucracy that impedes the development of crisis readiness. The opposition is procedural and policy-based, not personal, and demands the rapid overhaul of the system.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-07-29
A written demand submitted by 23 members of the Riigikogu for a vote of no confidence in the Minister of Infrastructure, Vladimir Svet.

15th Riigikogu, Riigikogu extraordinary session.

The main opponent is Minister of Infrastructure Vladimir Svet, who is being criticized both personally (the Savisaar faction) and politically for the position he has taken regarding Soviet symbols. The criticism is intense and accusatory, emphasizing the minister's perceived arrogance and his disregard for the feelings of the Estonian people. Additionally, the Deputy Speaker of the Riigikogu is criticized for intervening in a way that prevented the minister from answering important questions.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-07-29
Second Reading of the Motor Vehicle Tax Bill (364 UA)

15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu

The main opponent is the government led by the Reform Party, which is sharply criticized for incompetent leadership, breaking election promises, and implementing tax increases. The criticism is both political (tax hikes) and procedural, accusing the coalition of "steamrolling" the opposition and interest groups, acting "hastily and carelessly." The government is also accused of hijacking the word "kindlus" (security/certainty) for its own slogan.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-07-22
Granting Authorization to Prime Ministerial Candidate Kristen Michal to Form the Government

15th Riigikogu, Riigikogu's extraordinary session.

The main opponent is the Reform Party and its previous government, which is being intensely criticized on policy grounds for raising taxes and cutting family benefits. The criticism is highly intense, accusing the party of sowing uncertainty and undermining the foundations of family policy.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-07-15
Reconsideration of the Motor Vehicle Tax Act (364 UA) left unpromulgated by the President of the Republic

15th Riigikogu, Extraordinary session of the Riigikogu

The main opponent is the coalition government and its Minister of Social Protection, who is being criticized for ignoring proposals made by interest groups (the Association of Large Families) last spring. The criticism is aimed at political choices (the weakening of the law) and the attitude of officials who seem to imply that people with disabilities are abusing special provisions. The confrontation is intense and focuses on procedural and social failures.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-06-19
Third Reading of the Draft Law on the State Supplementary Budget for 2024 (Bill 456 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, extra plenary sitting

The main confrontation is aimed at the Minister of Finance and the government, who are accused of systematic misrepresentation and the abuse of trust. The criticism is intense, focusing both on personal credibility (election-time promises) and political consequences (a persistent budget deficit).
View Profile View Agenda
2024-06-14
Second Reading of the Draft State Supplementary Budget Act for 2024 (456 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, additional plenary session

The primary opponent is the Reform Party, which is being accused of systemic lying and brazenness in the run-up to the elections, as well as favoring the wealthy at the expense of national defense and children. Particularly sharp criticism is aimed at Annely Akkermann, whose assertions regarding the benefits of eliminating the tax hump are being labeled as misinformation, citing data from the Ministry of Finance.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-06-12
Second Reading of the Riigikogu Resolution "Supporting the Introduction of Nuclear Energy in Estonia" (431 OE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.

Direct opposition to the bill is not being voiced, but critics are questioning and criticizing the procedural integrity of its initiation, asking whether it is the result of lobbying. The speaker is addressing the skepticism prevalent in the chamber, which suggests indirect opposition to the idea of viewing the bill as the product of lobby groups.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-06-12
Estonian-language school environment

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, information briefing

The main opposition is directed at the administrative decision-makers (implicitly the Minister) responsible for the closure of the Estonian-language school. The criticism is policy- and procedure-based, stressing that the decision contradicts national interests and ignores local residents and parents who have taken the matter to court.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-06-12
Defense expenditures

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, information briefing

The primary opponent is the government, specifically the Reform Party and the Minister of Defence, who are being sharply criticized for their political decisions and for cutting national defence capabilities. The criticism targets both political failures (the 'Excel spreadsheet approach') and ethical issues (lying about ignoring the advice of the Commander of the Defence Forces). The speaker demands a complete change of course that precludes the continuation of the current policy.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-06-11
First Reading of the Riigikogu Draft Statement "On the Crisis of Democracy in Georgia" (449 AE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.

The adversaries are the delegates who challenge the necessity of the declaration, accusing it of meddling in the affairs of other nations and "telling them how to run their lives." The criticism is intense and value-driven, reflecting notes of concern and personal embarrassment regarding the tone adopted by the opponents.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-06-03
The written motion for a vote of no confidence in the Minister of Economic Affairs and Information Technology, Tiit Riisalo, submitted by 22 members of the Riigikogu.

Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary sitting.

The main opponent is Minister of Economic Affairs and Information Technology Tiit Riisalo, whose political proposals (the immigration quota) are being sharply criticized. Criticism is also directed at the government’s internal discord and its inability to work as a unified team to improve the economic environment.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-27
The 2024 Report by the Minister of Social Protection on the Implementation of the State's Long-Term Development Strategy "Estonia 2035"

Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary session

The primary opponent is the current government and Minister of Social Protection Signe Riisalo, who stands accused of perfidy and making cuts at the expense of children. The criticism is rooted in policy and values, focusing on the reduction of family benefits, tax increases, and the disregard for demographic policy. The government's policy is being labeled as shortsighted and even outright detrimental, suggesting a complete unwillingness to compromise.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-13
Interpellation regarding the suffrage of Russian citizens in Estonian local government elections during Russia's war against Ukraine (No. 624)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session

The main adversary is the Minister of the Interior, who is sharply criticized for political inconsistency and shifting previous stances during Kaja Kallas’s second government. The criticism is aimed at the minister’s attitudes, which allegedly disregard security assessments and are motivated purely by political gain. The opposition is intense and accusatory.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-08
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Local Government Council Election Act (387 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session.

The criticism is aimed at the lack of consensus in parliament, which is preventing the passing of necessary legislation, and at previous policies that have resulted in a large unintegrated immigrant population. Opposition is also directed at pro-Kremlin manifestations and influence operations, which must be brought under control within the country.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-08
Message Clarity

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing

The main opponent is the party Eesti 200 and its key figures (Margus Tsahkna, Kristina Kallas, Tiit Riisalo), who are criticized for both political incompetence and unethical behavior. The criticism is intense, focusing on accusations of brand hijacking, creative theft, and deceiving the public. The attacks are aimed at undermining the opposition's credibility and moral authority.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-02
First Reading of the Riigikogu Draft Statement (420 AE) "On Declaring the Moscow Patriarchate an Institution Supporting the Military Aggression of the Russian Federation"

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The primary criticism is aimed at Juku-Kalle Raid, who stands accused of ignorance regarding cultural history and attacking his fellow members in the context of Patriarch Kirill’s actions. Furthermore, the presenter of the statement (Jaak) is criticized for the procedural process, which fails to consider the delicate feelings of the faithful, and he is also accused of framing the issue incorrectly.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-02
Continuation of the first reading of the Bill on the Tax on Sweetened Beverages (418 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The primary criticism is aimed at the actions taken by the minister and the government, particularly regarding the failure to adhere to proper stakeholder engagement and good legislative practice. The minister has been accused of comparing manufacturers to tobacco producers and employing demagoguery while simultaneously ignoring the proposals put forth by experts. The criticism targets both the substance of the policy and the procedures followed.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-04-16
The Minister of Culture's 2024 Report on the Implementation of the State's Long-Term Development Strategy "Estonia 2035" (including the implementation of the "Estonian Sports Policy Fundamentals until 2030")

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The main opponent is the government and the Minister of Culture's political party, who are being criticized for passivity, delays (regarding teachers' salary increases and Rally Estonia), and unfair budget decisions. The criticism is intense and encompasses politics, procedures, and ethical questions (a lying government). He/She warns that cultural workers might be the next to strike if the government doesn't act quickly.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-04-11
Discussion of the Crucial National Issue: "How to Ensure the Future of Veterinary Medicine"

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The primary confrontation is aimed at "extreme green transition advocates," whose views on animal farming (CO2 generation) and the expense of rural settlement are considered dangerous by the speaker. The criticism is policy- and value-driven, calling into question the compatibility of these visions with food security and basic survival needs.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-04-08
Interpellation concerning the incitement of hatred towards families with children (No. 612)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The main opponent is Minister of Social Protection Signe Riisalo and the government, who are accused of inciting animosity between different family types and disparaging large families. The criticism is intense, addressing both political decisions (benefit cuts) and the minister's conduct and attitude ("unconcealed contempt," responding "snappishly"). The speaker also criticizes the minister's cooperation with the NGO "In the Name of a Fair State," which had already pitted target groups against each other during the elections.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-03-20
Suffrage

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, press briefing.

Strong opposition to the coalition's inaction regarding the suspension of voting rights, directly accusing the Social Democrats (naming Katri Raik) of fighting against and blocking the proposed amendment. Coalition ministers are criticized for their ideological opposition to large families, putting them through the wringer and ignoring them. The criticism targets both political inaction and ideological attitudes.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-03-19
First Reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic for Improving Teachers' Working Conditions" (373 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

Strong opposition is aimed at the Prime Minister's economic arguments concerning the level of education spending and the policies enacted by the Reform Party's Minister of Education. The criticism is policy-driven, specifically focusing on the detrimental impact that the contraction of the school network will have on regional policy and internal security. The opposition is intense because these political choices are being directly linked to negative social consequences.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-03-19
First Reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic to Lower the VAT Rate on Cancer Medicines" (277 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The primary criticism is aimed at the government as a whole and its tax policy, which is worsening the economy and people's sense of security. Separately, Health Minister Riina Sikkut is being criticized for allegedly distancing herself from the socio-political decisions made by other government ministries. The criticism is intense and touches upon both policy (tax hikes) and ethical conduct (the clawback of funds from victims of repression).
View Profile View Agenda
2024-03-19
The 2024 Report by the Minister of Health on the implementation of the state's long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035"

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The main confrontation is with the Minister of Health and the government, who are criticized for their ignorance regarding budget cuts and for burdening families by introducing new taxes. The criticism is aimed at specific political decisions (the withdrawal of funding) and the lack of coordination in the ministry's leadership (a reference to joint management by two ministers). The standoff is intense and demands specific remedial actions.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-03-13
First Reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic for Increasing the Birth Rate of the Estonian People" (283 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting.

The primary opponents are the Reform Party and Minister of Social Affairs Signe Riisalo, who face criticism both for their political decisions (such as benefit cuts and the car tax) and for procedural unfairness. The particularly sharp criticism stems from the fact that the Association of Large Families was not invited to the car tax debate, whereas the NGO ÕRN, which supports the government's policy, was invited. Controlled migration is categorically rejected as a proposed solution to the labor shortage.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-03-11
Interpellation Concerning the Negative Impacts of the Motor Vehicle Tax on Families with Children (No. 602)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session

The primary targets are the Government of the Republic, particularly Prime Minister Kaja Kallas and ministers Võrklaev and Riisalo, who stand accused of breaking their word and subjecting large families to constant torment and attrition. The criticism is intense, encompassing both political decisions (tax hikes, benefit cuts) and ethical failings (lying, lack of empathy, and pitting different family types against one another). No willingness to compromise has been expressed; instead, they are demanding an immediate exemption from the car tax.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-03-11
Interpellation concerning business activities originating in Estonia and related to Russia during the War in Ukraine (No. 598)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session

The primary adversary is the prime minister, and the criticism directed at them is personal, focusing heavily on double standards and hypocrisy. The attacks are intense, specifically calling into question the prime minister's moral authority to condemn doing business with Russia.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-03-11
Interpellation concerning Estonia's critical demographic situation (No. 597)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session

The confrontation is strong and aimed squarely at the Reform Party government, Prime Minister Kaja Kallas, and Minister of Social Protection Signe Riisalo. The criticism is twofold: policy-based (citing benefit cuts and the abolition of income tax relief) and moral, accusing the government of antagonizing families with children. The speaker specifically condemns the breaking of promises and the comparison of mothers in large families to marginalized individuals, demanding a review of the minister's activities.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-03-07
Debate on the matter of national importance, "The Future of Estonian Energy 2035," initiated by the Estonian Reform Party parliamentary group.

Fifteenth Riigikogu, third sitting, plenary session

The main opponent is the Reform Party and the incumbent government, which are sharply criticized for violating the principles of the market economy and subsidizing offshore wind farms. The criticism is policy-based, focusing on the government's decision to cancel Elektrilevi's 100 million euro investment and the negative impact this has on the security of supply. It accuses the government of conducting an energy debate that is one-sided and centered on private interests.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-02-21
Large families

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing

The primary confrontation is aimed at the minister and the government, sharply criticizing the policy of cutting family benefits and the statistics used to justify it. The criticism is also directed at the social division created by the opposing side and their demagogic behavior. The speaker accuses the opposing side of disseminating inaccurate facts publicly.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-02-15
Debate on the matter of national importance initiated by the Isamaa faction, titled "Estonia in Economic Recession. What is to be done?"

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The main opponent is the Reform Party and its coalition, who are accused of "railroading" taxes through parliament and outright lying. Criticism is aimed at specific individuals (Mart Võrklaev, Jürgen Ligi) and includes both political attacks (the unfair tax) and personal ones (references to the minister's education and ridiculing Ligi's comments). The opposition is intense and uncompromising.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-02-14
First Reading of the Motor Vehicle Tax Bill (364 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The opposition is aimed at the government and ministers, who are being criticized for rushing the passage of the law and for flawed legislative procedure. The politician accuses them of shifting problems onto other ministries and of treating large families disparagingly. The criticism is primarily procedural and political, focusing on the unfair consequences.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-02-14
Car Tax

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing

The main opponents are Finance Minister Mart Võrklaev and Minister of Social Protection Signe Riisalo, who are criticized for impolite behavior, concealing the draft bill, and the lack of clarity regarding the car tax objectives. The opposition to the government's policy is intense, including both procedural accusations (raising one's voice) and political ones (contradictory justifications regarding how the tax will be used).
View Profile View Agenda
2024-02-13
Debate on Foreign Policy as an Issue of Significant National Importance, initiated by the Foreign Affairs Committee

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session

The main criticism is directed at the coalition partner, who has blocked the revocation of voting rights for Russian and Belarusian citizens in local elections. The criticism is intense, accusing the other party of representing the interests of residents who uphold the values of a terrorist state, both in local municipalities and in presidential elections.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-02-05
Inquiry concerning immigration (No. 588)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting

The main opponent is the government and its ministers, whose pro-immigration statements are being criticized. The criticism is policy-based, focusing on the government's intention to solve problems by bringing in cheap labor at a time when unemployment is prevalent in the country.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-24
Review of the Implementation of the "Fundamentals of Legislation Policy until 2030" in 2022

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The speaker is clearly in opposition, criticizing the Minister of Justice/the government for failing to process the opposition's draft legislation. The criticism is directed at the government's inaction and political delay in resolving a crucial security and social issue.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-24
Voting rights of Russian citizens

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing

The primary opposition is aimed at the governing coalition, particularly the Social Democrats, who stand accused of refusing to address security matters and of fostering divisive discord that fragments society. The Centre Party and the SDE are also criticized for representing the interests of Russian voters, which impedes the handling of security threats. The criticism targets both the political substance and procedural stalling.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-23
Overview of the state of Research and Development and government policy in this field.

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The primary opposition is aimed at the government and the prime minister, who are being criticized for the failure of the Just Transition Fund framework and for allowing the industry in Ida-Virumaa to decline. The criticism is policy-driven and intense, demanding concrete political directives for officials to secure exemptions.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-22
Inquiry Regarding the Electricity Supply of Saaremaa (No. 68)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

Criticism is directed against the government, which is accused of politically motivated redirection of investments into a gas power plant project at the expense of strengthening the grid. The opposition is moderately intense, emphasizing that improving the security of supply has been relegated to a secondary concern.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-17
Government Decisions

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing

The primary opponent is the incumbent government and the prime minister, who are being criticized for political instability and incompetence. The criticism is both procedural (shelving draft legislation, lack of consensus) and substantive (selective implementation of recommendations from defense experts). The attacks are intense, particularly concerning the handling of security matters.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-08
Interpellation concerning the rise in costs (No. 354)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.

The opposition is aimed at the current government and the minister, who are accused of ignoring the previous government's austerity plans under the guise of seeking solutions. The criticism is political and focuses on inefficient public administration and costly projects, such as the construction of the Environment House. The inflexible rules governing European Union funds are also criticized.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-08
Interpellation concerning the impact of the Green Transition on the administrative area of the ministry under your leadership (No. 341)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.

The primary criticism is directed at the Ministry of Climate concerning its proposal to increase expenditures and create new positions. The criticism is policy- and procedure-based, focusing on the unreasonable growth of administrative costs and the disregard for the state's necessary austerity measures.
View Profile View Agenda
Back to Profiling