By Agendas: Helmen Kütt

Total Agendas: 84

Fully Profiled: 84

All Categories Political Position Topic Expertise Rhetorical Style Activity Patterns Opposition Stance Collaboration Style Regional Focus Economic Views Social Issues Legislative Focus
2025-10-15
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Social Welfare Act and Other Acts (732 SE)

The 15th Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting

The criticism is aimed at the drafters of the bill (the ministry) and procedural deficiencies, specifically the inclusion of standards in the explanatory memorandum rather than the text of the law itself. The absence of services for the visually impaired in the draft bill is also being criticized. The criticism is substantive and procedural, not personal.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-10-15
Cultural Workers' Salaries

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Information Hour

The main adversary is the Minister of Culture, who is sharply criticized for political inaction and the unequal treatment of cultural workers. The criticism addresses both the unfairness of salary levels and the procedural aspects of the planned system change, emphasizing that the change could eliminate the benchmark for salary increases.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-10-13
Interpellation concerning the necessity and timeliness of establishing a general quiet period during the breeding season (No. 804)

15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The speaker is not criticizing any specific opposing side or group. The focus is on obtaining information from the minister and the government, rather than launching attacks.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-10-13
Inquiry concerning the revenue base of local governments (No. 802)

15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The criticism is aimed at the actions of the Minister of Regional Affairs and Agriculture, focusing specifically on the failed implementation of agricultural policy. The criticism is strong and policy-driven, citing the accusation made by Ekseko that the aid provided was "too little, too late," which ultimately resulted in layoffs.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-10-09
First Reading of the Bill on Amendments to the Motor Vehicle Tax Act (625 SE)

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The opposition is directed against the proponent's arguments concerning the universal increase of disability benefits. The criticism is both substantive (the unfairness of the policy) and procedural, citing the exclusion of key stakeholders (the Chamber of Disabled Persons) from the bill's discussion. The criticism is intense and fact-based.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-10-09
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Value-Added Tax Act (661 SE)

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The primary criticism is aimed at the government, particularly the Reform Party and the Prime Minister, who are accused of insufficiently trusting and involving entrepreneurs. The criticism is procedural, alleging that the Prime Minister has failed to convene a roundtable with merchants, relying instead on a narrow range of sources. The speaker also criticizes the fact that the discussion is happening over the heads of those who are often referred to as beneficiaries.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-10-08
2025 Report by the Minister of Social Affairs on the Implementation of the National Long-Term Development Strategy "Estonia 2035"

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The criticism is aimed at the inaction of the state and the ministry in resolving the special needs care crisis, which has led to untenable situations where local municipalities are forced to seek justice through the courts. The opposition is policy- and procedure-based, highlighting the system's inefficiency and sluggishness.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-10-08
Special Social Care

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Information Hour

The primary target is the Prime Minister and the government, who face criticism for failing to meet a direct state obligation concerning special welfare services. The criticism is intense and centers on the absence of solutions in a situation where 1,000 people are awaiting the service. This contrasts the government's inaction with local municipalities, which are being forced to carry out state duties and resort to legal action.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-10-07
First Reading of the 2026 State Budget Bill (737 SE)

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The criticism is aimed at the government's budget drafting process, particularly concerning the timing and the absence of solutions for special needs care. Above all, there is opposition to the Minister of Education and Research on the question of responsibility, stressing that special needs care is a responsibility of the state. The criticism is policy-driven and has been presented in the form of a question.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-10-06
Interpellation concerning the insufficient state funding of school meals and the resulting inequality (No. 797)

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The criticism is aimed at the state's policy and the government's actions, which have created an unfair distribution of financial burden and obligations between local governments and the state. He/She criticizes the political direction, which may lead to a further reduction in meager subsidies (such as the one euro for school meals).
View Profile View Agenda
2025-10-06
Interpellation concerning the transfer of Swedish criminals to Estonia (No. 803)

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The main opponents are the Minister and the Justice Minister, who is his party colleague, both of whom are being criticized for their cavalier attitude and procedural errors. The criticism is based on both policy and procedure, emphasizing that the government's plan will result in significant costs and worsen the lives of the Estonian people. The opposition is intense and carries a strong warning.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-10-06
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Motor Vehicle Tax Act (Bill 677 SE)

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The criticism targets the management of the legislative process, citing inefficiency and delays in addressing the proposals put forward by the Chancellor of Justice. The objection is procedural, centering on the failure to resolve constitutional issues within the scope of the earlier draft bill.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-10-06
First reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Motor Vehicle Tax Act (694 SE)

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The criticism is aimed at the bill initiated by the government because it fails to address the specific needs of people with disabilities based on their target group. Specifically, critics point to the inadequacy of socio-political measures (such as the increase in benefits) and their unfair distribution across different levels of disability severity. Furthermore, earlier opponents who alleged that the Social Democrats were responsible for the car tax are also facing criticism.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-24
The Regional Affairs and Agricultural Minister's 2025 presentation on the implementation of the state's long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035"

Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.

The main criticism is aimed at the government and the minister, who are blamed for the crisis being prolonged due to the state's "inaction and indecisiveness." The criticism is intense and politically charged, directly connecting the government's failure to job losses and the industry's suffering.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-23
Open mic

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session

The main criticism is directed at the Government of the Republic and the state for the long-term underfunding of specialized social care. The criticism is political and economic in nature, also accusing the government of the negative impact that recent tax hikes (VAT, car tax) have had on service providers. The intensity of the criticism is high, pointing to the danger of the system collapsing.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-23
Inquiry regarding the cessation of number plate recognition cameras (no. 793)

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session

The criticism targets the procedural deficiencies of state authorities (especially the Tax and Customs Board) when substantiating their inquiries. The speaker objects to the practice of failing to inform individuals about the use of their data if no formal proceedings ensue, deeming this practice to cause a sense of insecurity.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-22
Inquiry Regarding the Bringing of Swedish Prisoners to Estonia (No. 792)

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session

The speaker is critical of the positive narrative put forth by the government (specifically, the Prime Minister) regarding the Swedish prisoner transfer agreement. The opposition is rooted in both political and financial concerns, primarily focusing on exposing the risks associated with hidden costs and the potential strain on the healthcare system.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-22
Request for information regarding the establishment of a business council and the potential conflicts of interest of its members (no. 788)

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session

The opposition is directed at the prime minister and the ruling coalition, criticizing the exclusive decision-making format they have chosen. The criticism is procedural, stressing the need to involve a wider political spectrum to solve the country's problems. The intensity of the attacks is low, focusing primarily on raising the issue.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-18
Bank of Estonia 2024 Report

15th Estonian Parliament, 6th sitting, plenary session.

The opposition is directed against previous attitudes that promoted going cashless, as well as the direction of the current government's/Riigikogu's tax policy. The criticism is political and focuses on economic choices, offering the lowering of VAT on foodstuffs as an alternative.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-16
The Chancellor of Justice's report on the conformity of legislative acts with the Constitution and the performance of other duties assigned to the Chancellor by law.

Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.

The criticism targets system flaws ("the machine might make mistakes too") and individual incompetent officials in the social sector, who are referred to as "bad apples." Political opponents are not criticized, and the criticism is generally procedural and low-intensity.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-10
A written request for a vote of no confidence in Social Minister Karmen Joller, submitted by 21 members of the Riigikogu.

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session

The opposition is directed at the Minister of Social Affairs (Karmen Joller), criticizing her lack of clarity regarding the social sector budget priorities she is taking into negotiations. The criticism is policy- and system-based, addressing deficiencies in healthcare accessibility, which lead to people arriving for treatment too late.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-08
Inquiry regarding the loss of essential banking services from county centers (no. 773)

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session

No direct confrontation or personal criticism is leveled against the minister. However, the criticism targets a broader trend leading to the disappearance of services (described using the phrase "closing doors"). The critique focuses on the policy's shortcomings and demands concrete future action. The Social Democrats' earlier, successful regional policy steps are positively highlighted.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-08
Inquiry regarding regulations concerning end-of-life issues (no. 766)

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session

The criticism is aimed at the government (the minister) and the management of the system, which has resulted in long waiting lists and the lack of regional services. The opposition is focused on systemic shortcomings in healthcare funding, which are forcing people to seek drastic end-of-life solutions.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-04
Chair implementation

15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu

The primary opposition is aimed at the Government of the Republic and the Minister of Social Affairs, Karmen Joller. The criticism is sharp and policy-based, centering on the government's inability to raise the subsistence level and resolve the crisis of underfunding in specialized care services. The government is also accused of utilizing the budget for election campaign purposes while disregarding genuine social issues.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-12
A written request for a vote of no confidence in Justice and Digital Minister Liisa-Ly Pakostale, submitted by 42 members of the Riigikogu.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The primary target is the Minister of Justice and Digital Affairs, who is sharply criticized for failing to take sufficient responsibility and for showing delayed empathy toward the victims of the Pihlakodu case. The criticism focuses on the Minister’s procedural errors (such as the late involvement of experts) and his communication style, which is considered aggressive and blame-shifting.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-12
Draft Law Amending the Employment Contracts Act and Other Acts (602 SE) – First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The main opponent is the minister/government, who is being criticized both for substantive changes and procedural errors (specifically, a lack of engagement). The criticism is intense, accusing the opposing side of devaluing the opinions of trade unions and professional associations and ignoring their concerns.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-11
Second reading of the draft law on the state's supplementary budget for 2025 (651 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The main opponent is the Reform Party, which is being criticized for postponing necessary social assistance, citing the prime minister's stance that this is a matter for the 2026 budget. The criticism is policy- and value-based, calling into question the Reform Party’s consistency in prioritizing needs-based support. The opposition is moderate, focusing on political inaction.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-10
The Chairman of the Supreme Court’s overview of court orders, the administration of justice, and the uniform application of laws.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.

The criticism is aimed at procedural and systemic shortcomings in the administration of justice, particularly concerning lengthy proceedings and premature convictions. Direct political opponents are not named; instead, the focus remains on improving the process.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-09
Inquiry Regarding the Spread of Poverty in Estonia (No. 757)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The main confrontation is directed at the governing coalition and the prime minister, criticizing their priorities, which focus on abolishing the tax hump and introducing the car tax while neglecting the poorest citizens. The criticism is political because the government is postponing the discussion on raising benefits until the 2026 budget debate, despite the fact that the situation demands an immediate solution. This constitutes an appeal to the Reform Party's ideological promises to help those who are genuinely struggling.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-05
Draft law amending the Road Traffic Act (616 SE) - first reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The speaker does not criticize any opposing side, but stresses that this is not an ideological difference, which suggests an expectation of no resistance. Instead of criticism, consensus is actively sought.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-04
2025 supplementary budget

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing

The primary resistance is aimed at the government and the Reform Party, criticizing their decision to omit the raising of the subsistence level and the funding of the SKAIS system from the supplementary budget. The criticism is policy-driven, questioning both the government's priorities and the validity of their argument regarding the scarcity of funds.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-03
Inquiry Regarding the Pihlakodu Case and the Safety of Care Homes (no. 750)

15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session

The criticism is directed at the actions of the Prosecutor's Office, as it downplayed the victims' experiences and found no grounds for initiating proceedings against the institution. The government and the coalition are also indirectly criticized for the ambiguous wording concerning the care reform, which is causing confusion and concern within the social welfare sector. The criticism is primarily procedural and political, not personal.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-02
Inquiry regarding the school network (no. 760)

15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session

There is no direct opposition, but the speaker is exercising oversight of the executive branch's activities by questioning the minister about the progress of the reform. The criticism is aimed more at procedural transparency and social accountability, rather than the substance of the policy itself.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-02
Inquiry regarding the qualification requirements for youth workers (no. 745)

15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session

No data available
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-02
Inquiry Regarding the Pihlakodu Case and the Prosecutor's Office Activities (no 748)

15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session

The primary criticism is aimed at the minister and social welfare service providers (both municipal and private entities) for their lack of accountability. The criticism is both procedural and results-based, rejecting attempts to justify the deficiencies and demanding that lessons be learned from the incident. Separately, the passivity of the institutions prior to media intervention is also criticized.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-02
First reading of the draft law on the state's supplementary budget for 2025 (651 SE)

15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session

While direct confrontation is avoided, a critical question is raised concerning the supplementary budget deficits related to SKAIS funding. The speaker defends the former official (Maret Maripuu), stressing that the issue stems from a lack of financial resources, rather than work not being completed. The criticism is aimed squarely at the political decision to exclude critical funding from the budget.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-21
Draft law amending the Act on Social Support for People with Disabilities and amending other acts related thereto (561 SE) – third reading

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.

Strong criticism was directed at the government and the Minister of Social Affairs, Karmen Joller, accusing them of budget cuts, inaction (specifically concerning SKAIS funding), and ignoring key stakeholders (the Estonian Chamber of Disabled People). The prime minister is also criticized for scapegoating Maret Maripuu, the head of the Social Insurance Board, for the SKAIS problems, while stressing that accountability rests at a higher level.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-20
Draft law amending the Enterprise Income Tax Simplification Act, the Security Tax Act, and the Income Tax Act (645 SE) – First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The opposition is directed against the government's tax policy, criticizing it on policy grounds because it increases inequality and makes it harder for people to make ends meet. The criticism is intense regarding the social consequences, but it is presented in the form of questions and the offering of alternatives.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-20
Inquiry Regarding Electrical Power Generation Capacities (No. 746)

15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.

The standoff is evident in the formal query directed at the minister, which calls into question the effectiveness of the ministry’s support for local governments. The criticism is policy- and procedure-based, not personal.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-19
Inquiry Regarding Estonian Environmental Policy (No. 743)

15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.

The primary opposition is aimed at the minister and the government's environmental policy, which is widely viewed as short-sighted and inconsistent. The criticism is grounded in policy and procedure, specifically focusing on the decision to lower the minimum felling age of forests.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-19
An inquiry regarding the illegal alteration of the order of protection of natural objects (no. 738)

15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.

The speaker is critical of the actions taken by the government or the responsible ministry that resulted in infringement proceedings being initiated against Estonia. The criticism focuses on procedural errors and a lack of accountability, demanding that those responsible be identified.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-19
Inquiry regarding labor productivity, Estonia's competitiveness, and cheap labor (no. 742)

15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.

The criticism is directed at the course of action taken by the government or the minister, which has failed to adequately address the growing problem of NEET youth (Not in Education, Employment, or Training) and those who have withdrawn from the labor market. The criticism is policy-based, emphasizing the need to better utilize existing resources and prevent the loss of significant human resources.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-15
The Minister of Education and Research's 2025 presentation on the implementation of the state's long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035"

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The criticism relates more to inaction or insufficient promotion within the vocational education sector, rather than direct political opposition to the minister's policies. Specific opponents or groups being criticized are not named.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-15
Draft law (610 SE) for amending the Nature Conservation Act and, in consequence, amending other laws (Nature assessment) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session

The opposition is aimed at the actions taken by the government or the executive branch regarding the confidentiality of the content of the infringement procedure. The criticism is procedural, stressing that members of parliament have not been granted access to crucial information that impacts legislation.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-14
Draft law amending the Act on Social Support for People with Disabilities and amending other acts in connection therewith (561 SE) – Second Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session

The criticism is aimed at the actions of the Minister of Social Affairs and the government, particularly concerning the insufficient funding and lack of places for special welfare services. The speaker expresses concern that the government’s austerity measures could affect "the most vulnerable and weakest." The criticism is policy- and performance-based, demanding that the Minister take active steps and advocate for the sector during budget negotiations.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-07
Draft law amending the Unemployment Insurance Act and, in consequence thereof, amending other laws (519 SE) – Second Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The opposition is targeting their Centre Party counterparts, who are being criticized for twice making errors with legislative terminology. The criticism is strictly procedural—not substantive or personal—and its aim is to correct the mistake and clarify public understanding.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-07
People's livelihood

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing

The criticism targets the unreliable operation of the Social Insurance Board's information systems and the government's failure to secure funding for the system. No direct personal opposition is being voiced; instead, a solution is being demanded from the government via budget negotiations. The opposition is procedural and outcome-based.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-06
Inquiry regarding the future of the ferry connection (no. 739)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The opposition is directed at the government's inaction or the obstacles hindering the implementation of full funding. The criticism targets political, economic, and legal hurdles, not individuals, making it policy-based rather than personal.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-05
Inquiry Regarding Rural Areas (no. 713)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The criticism targets the government's planning process because it risks generating conflicting ideas that fail to account for the necessary additional resources for public transport. The opposition is moderate, centering on the practical and resource-based aspects of policy implementation. The criticism is procedural, not personal.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-05
Inquiry Regarding the Coping of Pensioners (No. 726)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The main criticism is aimed at the Minister of Social Affairs and the government for their inaction in fixing outdated information systems, which has resulted in the delayed pension payments for nearly 100 people. The criticism is both procedural and outcome-based, stressing that the system is on the verge of collapse and experienced 11 failures last year.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-05
Inquiry regarding the social welfare reform (no 720)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The primary criticism is aimed at those political parties who deem the reform a failure and express this with gloating or mockery, rather than focusing on how to fix it. Procedural criticism is directed at local governments that fail to organize tenders, thereby allowing the price hike to continue. Satisfaction is expressed that the talk of slowing down pension increases—a topic that arose while the Social Democrats were in government—has finally ceased.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-04-23
Coping

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing

The primary criticism is aimed at the current government and the Prime Minister, accusing them of a lack of clarity regarding cuts in the social and healthcare sectors, and of neglecting the well-being of the elderly in 2025. The criticism is policy-driven and demands that the government disclose the content of the negotiations, while avoiding the response, "nothing is agreed until everything is agreed." Disagreements with the coalition partner Eesti 200 concerning the sustainability of the pension system were also brought to light.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-04-22
Draft law amending the Act on Obligations and, consequently, other laws (613 SE) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

No data available.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-04-22
The Minister of Culture's 2025 presentation on the implementation of the state's long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035" (including the implementation of "The Fundamentals of Estonian Sports Policy until 2030")

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The criticism is aimed at the implementation of government policy and reforms (the public library reform), focusing on political consequences, such as the loss of state-supported jobs. The opposition is policy-based and framed as a question, rather than being a personal attack. Specifically, the criticism targets the state for relinquishing certain tasks and thereby imposing additional obligations on local authorities.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-04-15
The Ministry of Justice and Digital Transformation's 2025 presentation on the implementation of the state's long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035."

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.

The criticism targets the state's administration of the legal system, specifically regarding the quality of state-assigned counsel, pointing to a systemic weakness. The opposition is policy- and procedure-based, not personal, despite being addressed to the minister.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-03-26
Sense of security

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing

The primary opposition is aimed at the government and the prime minister, who are being criticized for their inability to solve immediate cost-of-living issues and for proposed legislative changes that would reduce job security. The criticism is based on both policy and procedure, calling the prime minister's leadership capabilities into question.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-03-18
Draft law amending the Aliens Act and, in consequence thereof, amending other laws (to improve migration proceedings) – second reading

Fifteenth Riigikogu, fifth sitting, plenary session

The opposition is aimed at the priorities of the government or the bill's proponents, specifically the energy and money being spent on immigration procedures. The criticism is policy-driven, questioning whether resources shouldn't be directed toward addressing domestic social and economic issues instead.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-03-17
An inquiry regarding the narrowing scope of Estonian as a language of science (no. 716)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

No data available.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-03-17
Inquiry Regarding Maarjamaa United School (No. 710)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The primary opposition is directed at the Ministry of Education and Research concerning both the procedure and the substance of merging special schools. Criticism is focused on the procedural failure (a lack of analysis) and the political direction regarding the future of special schools and the shortcomings of inclusive education. The speaker demands that the minister bravely acknowledge if anything has gone wrong during the course of the reform.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-03-11
The Prime Minister's address for 2025 on the implementation of the long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035" (including an overview of the situation of research and development activities and the government's policy in this area).

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

Insufficient data.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-02-20
Discussion of the nationally important issue "Plan for the Future of Sport: How to Bring Medals and Get Children Moving"

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session.

No criticism is intended; the speaker merely offers a constructive proposal for reordering the priorities of the discussion topic. There is no confrontation; rather, this is about providing supplementary emphasis.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-02-17
Inquiry regarding the merging of schools for children with special educational needs (no 684)

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session

The criticism is directed at the claims made by the minister and his government regarding the objectives of merging schools. The opposition is both procedural and policy-based, calling into question whether sufficient substantive analysis has been conducted to justify the structural changes.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-02-10
First reading of the draft resolution of the Riigikogu, "Proposal to the Republic of Estonia's Government to carry out an analysis of the impact of young people’s social media use" (550 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session

Data is scarce.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-01-29
Draft law amending the Act on Social Support for People with Disabilities and amending other acts related thereto (561 SE) - first reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The speaker does not express direct opposition, as they are the rapporteur. However, criticism from other committee members (Kingo, Solman) is documented regarding the Social Insurance Board's practice of determining disability and the state's legal advantage over organizations representing people with disabilities.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-21
Draft law amending the Unemployment Insurance Act and, in consequence thereof, amending other laws (519 SE) - first reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

Insufficient data
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-21
Second reading of the bill amending the Income Tax Act and the Defence Service Act, and the bill amending the Income Tax Act (509 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The direct opponent is not criticized, but indirect criticism is leveled at the commission and the previous procedure, which left the criteria unclear. The criticism targets procedural shortcomings that have led to regrettable outcomes ("everyone is ashamed").
View Profile View Agenda
2024-10-24
Draft law amending the Medicinal Products Act (501 SE) – First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session

The objection is directed at the misinterpretation of the draft bill, which had previously been presented as a requirement. The speaker refutes this assertion, emphasizing that it is a choice, without directly attacking opponents or their policies.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-10-21
Inquiry Regarding the Care Reform (no 649)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

There is no direct confrontation, as the speaker supports the ongoing reform. The criticism is aimed at the inefficiency of the previous system, where the burden of care fell upon relatives and pensioners. Furthermore, municipalities are criticized for their previously inconsistent approach when determining the personal contribution.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-10-17
Draft law amending the Social Welfare Act (pension support) - first reading (508 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

Criticism is aimed at the practice of local governments taking an excessively large portion of pensions (up to 95%) from the elderly to cover nursing home fees, leaving them with only pocket money. Concern is also being raised regarding the significant cuts directed at the Ministry of Social Affairs, which threaten already underfunded sectors. The opposition is based on policy and procedure, not personal issues.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-10-17
Draft law amending the Social Welfare Act and the Value Added Tax Act (mental health services) – first reading (500 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

There is not enough data.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-09-25
The Regional Affairs and Agricultural Minister's 2024 presentation on the implementation of the state’s long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035"

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session

The criticism is not directed at individuals, but rather at the government's fiscal policy and its impact on the promised reforms. The speaker questions whether the current austerity situation allows for the implementation of the reforms.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-09-25
The second reading of the draft law amending the Social Welfare Act and other laws (special care services and change of address) (421 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session

There is no direct confrontation, but the speaker critically addresses the concern raised by the Association of Estonian Cities and Municipalities (ELVL) regarding the imposition of hidden obligations on local governments. The ELVL sees a risk that the state's financial situation could influence the referral decisions made by the Social Insurance Board, thereby leaving local authorities to cover service costs that the state itself does not fund. The speaker acknowledges this concern but stresses the necessity of regulation to resolve the current situation.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-09-17
Report by the Chancellor of Justice on the compliance of legal instruments with the Constitution and the performance of other duties imposed on the Chancellor of Justice by law.

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

Insufficient data. The speech completely lacks any criticism or confrontation of other political forces or government agencies, focusing instead on constructive problem framing.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-06-13
Financial Supervision Authority 2023 Annual Report

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session

Not enough data
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-29
First reading of the Riigikogu Draft Resolution "Supporting the Introduction of Nuclear Energy in Estonia" (431 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The main criticism is aimed at the bill’s proponents, who prioritize swift action over careful consideration and deem the financial plan irrelevant. Particular criticism is leveled against the position that allows foreign capital to extract profits while leaving Estonia with the pollution and a long-term burden.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-29
First reading of the Draft Act Amending the Child Protection Act and Other Acts (427 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The confrontation is low-intensity and primarily relates to previous legislative procedures. The Free Party (Vabaerakond) faced indirect criticism regarding the 2019 draft bill on benefits for children with disabilities, as their financial accounting was flawed and deemed unacceptable from the perspective of the state budget. The criticism was policy- and procedure-based, not personal.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-27
The 2024 Report by the Minister of Social Protection on the Implementation of the State's Long-Term Development Strategy "Estonia 2035"

Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary session

There is no criticism; instead, the prevailing tone regarding the minister’s work is appreciative and constructive. While S2 does make a factual correction to the previous statement by "good colleague Lauri Laats" concerning the history of the increase in benefits for children with disabilities, this is a procedural clarification, not a personal attack.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-15
First Reading of the Draft Act Amending the Social Welfare Act and Other Acts (Special Welfare Services and Changing the Address of Residence) (421 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

No data available
View Profile View Agenda
2024-04-11
Discussion of the Crucial National Issue: "How to Ensure the Future of Veterinary Medicine"

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

Insufficient data.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-04-09
Report by the Minister of Economic Affairs and Information Technology on the implementation of the state's long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035"

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The criticism is aimed at the Minister of Economic Affairs and Information Technology, focusing on procedural discrepancies and political omissions. Specifically, the Minister is being reproached for concealing changes to unemployment benefits from the Social Affairs Committee, which is actually responsible for this issue. The opposition is primarily procedural and political, rather than personal.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-03-12
First Reading of the Draft Act Amending the Local Government Organization Act (Bill 289 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd plenary sitting

The criticism is aimed at the position taken by the presenter of the draft bill, who fails to see a contradiction between restricting electoral alliances and the desire to participate. The opposition specifically targets the assertion regarding the instability of electoral coalitions, demanding studies to substantiate this claim. The criticism is based on policy and procedure, and is not personal.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-03-06
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Health Insurance Act and Consequently Amendments to Other Acts (Prevention of Incapacity for Work) (Bill 377 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

There is no confrontation.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-03-05
2024 Report by the Minister of Education and Research on the Implementation of the State's Long-Term Development Strategy "Eesti 2035" (Education Reforms)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The criticism is directed at the procedural and effectiveness aspects of implementing inclusive education, rather than the person of the minister or the original direction of the policy. The speaker opposes practices that fail to consider the needs of all children with special needs, leading to mental health problems for them. Specific opponents or groups are not named.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-11
First reading of the Bill for the Amendment of the Vital Statistics Registration Act (106 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The main opposition is directed at the stance taken by the Government of the Republic and the Ministry of Social Affairs, which does not support the draft bill, citing the wrong legislation and the potential risk of human trafficking. The criticism is measured but clear, emphasizing that while the ministries acknowledge the existence of the problem, they are failing to offer a swift solution. The government’s position is characterized as an unreasonable procedure.
View Profile View Agenda
Back to Profiling