By Agendas: Andre Hanimägi

Total Agendas: 101

Fully Profiled: 101

All Categories Political Position Topic Expertise Rhetorical Style Activity Patterns Opposition Stance Collaboration Style Regional Focus Economic Views Social Issues Legislative Focus
2025-10-08
Third reading of the Draft Act supplementing the Police and Border Guard Act (670 SE)

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The speaker sharply criticized the opposition (the Centre Party and Isamaa/Urmas Reinsalu) for both substantive and procedural shortcomings. The Centre Party was criticized for dismissing the advice of PPA (Police and Border Guard Board) experts, while the Isamaa representative was accused of only presenting significant objections during the third reading. The fears raised by the opponents (such as car tax fine notices) were directly labeled as scaremongering.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-10-07
First Reading of the 2026 State Budget Bill (737 SE)

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The primary opponent is the government, whose policies are being heavily criticized for increasing social inequality through income tax changes. The criticism is strictly policy-based, emphasizing the controversial nature of the government's choices and warning of long-term societal problems.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-24
Second reading of the draft law amending the Police and Border Guard Act (670 SE)

Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.

The criticism is aimed at political parties who argue that the license plate recognition system excessively infringes upon personal liberties and that the benefits do not outweigh the drawbacks. The speaker deems the opponents' stance irrational and inadequate, particularly when considering the "surveillance society" rhetoric. He contrasts his viewpoint with those who seek to tie the hands of the police.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-23
Inquiry regarding the cessation of number plate recognition cameras (no. 793)

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session

The main confrontation is directed against the Minister of the Interior and the government coalition, criticizing their decision to suspend the ANPR system and the subsequent legislative confusion. The criticism is both procedural (delay, rejection of the draft bill) and political, accusing the minister of making a hasty decision and bearing political responsibility for unsolved crimes. The absence of compromise during the initiation of the bill underscores a sharp confrontation with the coalition.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-22
Inquiry Regarding the Bringing of Swedish Prisoners to Estonia (No. 792)

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session

The opposition's position targets the government's inadequate long-term planning concerning the provision of services for Swedish prisoners. The criticism is policy-driven, demanding a clear strategy to justify the investments and prevent a situation where the Swedes suddenly terminate the service. The intensity of the critique is moderate, having even begun with praise directed at the Prime Minister.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-17
Re-examination of the Act Amending the Act on Churches and Religious Communities (570 UA) Not Proclaimed by the President of the Republic

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting.

The primary opposition comes from the President of the Republic and his legal advisor, who are challenging the constitutionality of the law, specifically citing ambiguous prohibitions and proportionality issues. Criticism is also aimed at members of parliament (e.g., Varro Vooglaid), who perceive a deeper constitutional conflict. The speaker criticizes the fearmongering—the suggestion that the autonomy of education is being interfered with—but emphasizes that the conflict is primarily political and procedural in nature.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-16
The Chancellor of Justice's report on the conformity of legislative acts with the Constitution and the performance of other duties assigned to the Chancellor by law.

Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.

Not enough data.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-15
An inquiry regarding the hindrance of development in the defence industry (no 783)

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting

The opposition is aimed at the government's actions, criticizing the administrative speed (the so-called "Estonian speed") and legislative restrictions that impede investments. The criticism is procedural and focuses on specific failures in attracting investments. The confrontation targets the minister's area of responsibility.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-11
The Financial Supervision Authority's 2024 Report

15th Riigikogu, 6th plenary sitting

No direct political opponents are named, but there is sharp criticism of the lack of political will, which has hindered the processing of the Financial Ombudsman bill (ready in 2022). The criticism is aimed at procedural inertia and legislative delays, which leave consumers unprotected.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-11
Draft law amending the Act of Obligations (621 SE) - first reading

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session

The criticism is aimed at the representative of the Government of the Republic concerning the absence of an impact analysis and the government's lack of plans to commission one. The general stance, which deems banks "partners of the Estonian state and citizens" and prioritizes the inviolability of contracts over state intervention to protect borrowers, is also being criticized.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-11
Draft law amending the Holiday and Commemoration Day Act (636 SE) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session

No data available
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-10
A written request for a vote of no confidence in Social Minister Karmen Joller, submitted by 21 members of the Riigikogu.

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session

The criticism is directed at the Minister of Social Affairs (Minister of Health) for taking a passive stance during budget talks, specifically for failing to show up on the "barricades" to fight for funding. Other ministers and politicians are indirectly criticized for prioritizing tax cuts (such as the car tax or income tax hike) instead of addressing the nation's critical healthcare deficit. The core of the critique centers on political choices and the setting of priorities.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-09
The Minister of Defence's 2025 presentation on the implementation of the state's long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035"

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session.

The primary criticism is aimed at the Minister of Defence and the ministry, calling into question their procedural competence and financial oversight. The criticism is performance-based, citing the previous issue involving a 10 million euro advance payment, which suggests an inability to properly manage the funds.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-08
Inquiry Regarding the Development of Nuclear Energy in Estonia (No. 786)

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session

The criticism is aimed at the plans for developing the nuclear power plant and their financial viability, highlighting the risk of incurring significant costs for a project that might only operate partially (30–40%) in the future. The criticism is policy-driven and focuses on preventing unreasonable expenditures, rather than targeting individuals.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-08
Inquiry regarding the government's plans to increase immigration (no. 791)

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session

The opposition is directed at the government's specific plan to increase immigration, criticizing it on a political level because it fails to utilize the existing wide-ranging exceptions. The criticism has been presented in the form of skeptical questions and the offering of alternative solutions, rather than as a personal attack.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-08
Inquiry regarding the loss of essential banking services from county centers (no. 773)

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session

The main criticism is aimed at the government coalition's tax policy, particularly the income tax reform initiated by the coalition partner. The criticism is policy-based, arguing that the reforms increase inequality and provide the greatest benefits to residents of Tallinn and wealthier municipalities. The opposition is strong because the situation is deemed "not quite okay."
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-08
Inquiry regarding regulations concerning end-of-life issues (no. 766)

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session

The criticism is aimed at the government's inaction and slowness in initiating legislation, rather than at specific political opponents. The question is being raised whether the government's planned discussions will ever lead to concrete results, or if the situation will simply persist as a legal vacuum.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-04
Chair implementation

15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu

The main criticism is directed at the government and the coalition, especially Interior Minister Igor Taro and the Riigikogu board. The criticism is primarily procedural and political, highlighting the government's inability to resolve issues (the ANPR system mess) and internal dissonance (contradictory positions among the ministries). The intensity of the criticism ranges from moderate to strong, demanding political accountability from the minister.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-18
Draft law amending the Police and Border Guard Act (670 SE) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The primary criticism is aimed at the Minister of the Interior, whose decision to shut down the cameras is considered misguided and detrimental to Estonia's security, especially ahead of the summer season. Criticism is also directed at the Legal Committee, which initially refused to take the Ministry of the Interior's draft legislation into proceedings, causing confusion and delays.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-18
First reading of the draft resolution of the Riigikogu, "Submitting a Proposal to the Government of the Republic" (630 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The speaker takes a stand against those who view the anti-fraud action plan as an ideological issue or the promotion of a "nanny state." He sharply criticizes the notion that everyone is responsible for themselves, stressing that society is only as strong as its weakest link. He hopes that the debate does not devolve into a mere tug-of-war between the opposition and the coalition.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-18
Draft law amending the Churches and Religious Communities Act (570 UA) - Third Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The main confrontation is aimed at the institution of the Moscow Patriarchate and Patriarch Kirill, who are considered the ideological support of the Russian regime and the legitimizer of the ideology of violence. Criticism is also leveled against those who argue that the state should not interfere in religious affairs, stressing that intervention is necessary to ensure law and security. The criticism is ideological and political.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-12
A written request for a vote of no confidence in Justice and Digital Minister Liisa-Ly Pakostale, submitted by 42 members of the Riigikogu.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The opposition targets the process concerning the prison lease agreement, which is being overseen by the Minister of Justice and Digital Affairs. The criticism is both procedural and institutional, highlighting that the warnings issued by state security authorities (KAPO and the Prosecutor General) have not been adequately addressed.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-11
Draft law amending the Church and Religious Communities Act (570 UA) – second reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The main opponents are the Centre Party faction and Varro Vooglaid, who submitted amendments and raised questions regarding the bill's constitutionality, often referencing the President's positions. The criticism targets the content and legal clarity of the draft legislation, but the speaker addresses these points factually, explaining why the committee failed to support most of the proposals (for instance, the Centre Party's proposal received only 2 supporting votes). He repeatedly dismisses accusations that the bill is aimed at persecuting a specific religion.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-11
Second reading of the draft law on the state's supplementary budget for 2025 (651 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

Strong opposition is aimed at the Finance Committee for failing to support any of the Social Democrats' amendments, and at the Reform Party, which is accused of keeping regional policy stalled. Particularly sharp criticism is directed at the Center Party (Lauri Laats), accusing them of political hypocrisy and forgetting their past failures. The criticism is both policy-based (tax reform) and substantive/procedural (regarding committee decisions).
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-11
Continuation of the second reading of the draft law amending the Competition Act and, in connection therewith, amending other laws (609 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The criticism is aimed at the government coalition’s internal disputes and its inability to reach a consensus, which manifested as a "tug-of-war" between the Reform Party and Eesti 200. The opposition is both procedural and results-oriented, highlighting the fine incurred due to the government’s inaction and the questions that have arisen in the public sphere.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-11
About coping

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing.

The main confrontation is directed at the Prime Minister and the Reform Party, who are accused of killing off regional policy and prioritizing Tallinn. The criticism is sharp and focuses on the government's lack of accountability to the entire country and on political injustice. The situation in Tallinn is being called a party rating crisis, not a management crisis.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-09
Inquiry regarding a network of number plate recognition cameras and the associated database (no. 756)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The confrontation is focused on the Interior Minister's premature decision to halt the system, as well as the internal discord within the coalition (Ministry of Justice vs. Ministry of the Interior). Strong criticism is also leveled against those spreading surveillance society phobia, their arguments being dismissed as "nonsense" and "political babble." The critique addresses both the procedural failure and the political unreasonableness.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-05
Draft law amending the Road Traffic Act (616 SE) - first reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The main opposition stems from the government and the coalition (especially the Reform Party), whose negative feedback regarding the draft legislation is already known. The criticism targets the government’s political inconsistency (referring to differing viewpoints in Tallinn versus at the national level) and particularly emphasizes the fact that the Riigikogu has failed to grant the municipal police (Mupo) the necessary supervisory powers, labeling this failure "a matter of emotion and preference."
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-03
The Minister of Public Administration's 2025 presentation on the implementation of the state's long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035"

Fifteenth Riigikogu, fifth session, plenary session

Criticism is aimed at the government's failures to act and systemic decisions that have deepened the market crisis, highlighting the negative impact of the VAT increase on construction prices. They oppose the state's current practice of selling land (via RKAS or MaRu) simply to generate quick revenue, demanding a fundamental shift in policy. The reliance solely on market forces is also criticized.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-03
Inquiry Regarding the Establishment of Tallinn Hospital (no 762)

15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session

The main confrontation is directed against the inaction of the government and the Minister of Social Affairs, criticizing the lack of decisions and the demand for additional analyses, which is considered stalling. The criticism is intense and focuses on procedural failure, also pointing out that although a "known obstructionist" was removed from the coalition, decisions have still not materialized.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-03
Inquiry Regarding the Pihlakodu Case and the Safety of Care Homes (no. 750)

15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session

The criticism targets the inaction or delays by the government (or the minister) in implementing the promised working group and the long-term plan. This is both procedural and results-based criticism, demanding an update on the progress achieved.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-21
The Minister of Energy and Environment's 2025 presentation on the implementation of the long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035"

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.

The opposition is indirectly aimed at Prime Minister Kaja Kallas’s previous stance regarding the manageability of nuclear energy. The criticism is policy-based and moderate, while simultaneously partially acknowledging the opposing side’s argument ("They are right in that sense"). The primary objective is policy clarification, not a personal attack.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-21
Draft law (642 SE) for withdrawing from the convention prohibiting the use, stockpiling, production and transfer of anti-personnel mines and requiring their destruction – first reading

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.

The main opponent is Russia, which is described as an aggressor violating international law and disregarding conventions, and one that does not refrain from using force. Criticism is also directed at those who emphasize the humanitarian aspects of adhering to the convention, but these objections are overruled by prioritizing national security.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-15
Draft law (610 SE) for amending the Nature Conservation Act and, in consequence, amending other laws (Nature assessment) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session

The criticism is aimed at the consequences of the draft bill, which are causing concern among forest owners and imposing restrictions. The opposition is focused on the substance of the policy, not the individuals, and involves demanding clarifications and mitigation measures.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-14
Reconsideration of the Act Amending the Act on Churches and Religious Communities (570 UA), Not Proclaimed by the President of the Republic

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session

The primary objection is aimed at the stance taken by the legal advisors to the President of the Republic, who dispute the constitutionality and legal clarity of the law's specific wording. The speaker criticizes the president's approach for focusing excessively on theoretical court procedures rather than the actual text of the legislation itself. Furthermore, he rejects the political rhetoric that seeks to reduce the issue merely to an attack against people of faith.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-13
Draft law amending the Courts Act and, in consequence thereof, amending other laws (to improve the administration of courts) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session

The criticism targets the system established by draft bill 632 SE, a system that allows politicians to evade accountability and transform crucial decisions into seemingly non-political matters. This opposition is rooted in both policy and procedure, centering on the erosion of the political role in governance.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-12
Inquiry regarding potential amendments to the Arms Act (No. 755)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.

The opposition is aimed at Interior Minister Igor Taro and his party colleagues (such as Tarmo Tamm), who support placing greater trust in the public and expanding access to firearms. The criticism is political and value-based, rejecting the assertion that an increase in the number of weapons ensures better security, and denying the Social Democratic Party’s accusations that they are harassing gun owners.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-08
Implementation of the Minister of Justice and Digital Transformation's 2025 submission "Fundamental Principles of Criminal Policy until 2030"

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The criticism and opposition are directed squarely at the perpetrators of fraud and the money laundering intermediaries (the "mules"), whose lives are intended to be made significantly harsher through changes in the law. Neither political opponents nor the ministry's activities are being directly criticized; rather, constructive questions are being posed.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-06
The Minister of Finance's 2025 presentation on the implementation of the state's long-term strategy "Estonia 2035" (including an overview of the development directions of the public service in 2024)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The speaker, representing the opposition, is challenging the government's actions, specifically criticizing the previous rhetoric of the coalition partner (Foreign Minister Margus Tsahkna) concerning "brutal cuts." The criticism focuses on the lack of transparency in the policy, demanding clarification on the extent of the cuts, the affected target groups, and the actual progress made in public sector savings.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-06
Inquiry regarding the future of the ferry connection (no. 739)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The critique is not aimed directly at the opponents, but rather at the procedural failure to resolve a recurring political dispute (which has been termed "endless wrangling") stemming from a lack of thorough analysis. The criticism targets the policy-making methodology, not the individuals involved.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-06
Inquiry regarding the reorganization of Kehtna Vocational Education Centre and Vana-Vigala Technical and Service School (no 733)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The opposition is aimed at the actions taken by the government or ministry regarding the school's reorganization and potential closure. The criticism is policy-driven, focusing on the failure to reform the school to meet Estonia's needs, instead of simply shutting it down.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-05
Inquiry Regarding Rural Areas (no. 713)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

There is no opposing viewpoint or criticism; the speaker is asking the minister questions to clarify the direction of the policy and to obtain information about future plans.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-05
Draft law amending the Competition Act and, in connection therewith, amending other laws (609 SE) - first reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The criticism is aimed at the inaction and inefficiency of the executive branch (the minister/government) in transposing the directive, which has resulted in financial loss for the state. The objection is both procedural and outcome-based, focusing on the deficiencies in the government's administrative capacity.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-04-23
Second reading of the draft law amending the Whistleblower Protection Act concerning EU law violations and the International Sanctions Act (EU restrictive measures directive) (584 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

No specific opponents or political criticism are named, but it is noted that 3 members of the committee voted against the proposal to conclude the second reading. The opposition was procedural rather than substantive.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-04-22
The Minister of Culture's 2025 presentation on the implementation of the state's long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035" (including the implementation of "The Fundamentals of Estonian Sports Policy until 2030")

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The opposition is directed at the deficiencies in the Ministry of Culture’s action plan, specifically criticizing the fact that e-sports and the gaming industry have not been brought up in the discussion. The criticism focuses on policy and strategy, and is not personal. The intensity is moderate, expressed in the form of a question.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-04-17
First reading of the draft resolution of the Riigikogu, "Submitting a proposal to the Republic of Estonia's Government to reduce the VAT on foodstuffs to 9 percent" (579 OE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session

The primary opposition is aimed at the Reform Party, whose narratives and dogmas must be shattered with facts. Additionally, a specific rapporteur (Mr. Laats) is criticized for avoiding substantive answers and simply reading verbatim from paper, which demonstrates dissatisfaction with procedural correctness.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-04-15
The Ministry of Justice and Digital Transformation's 2025 presentation on the implementation of the state's long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035."

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.

The opposition is aimed at the actions of the government and the Ministry of Justice, sharply criticizing the violation of social dialogue concerning the amendments to the Employment Contracts Act and ineffective lawmaking (the fragmentation of the Competition Act). The criticism is policy- and procedure-based, accusing the government of undermining trust and creating excessive Euro-bureaucracy. The criticism was particularly sharp regarding the state’s initial statements in the Pihlakodu case, which offended the public’s sense of justice.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-04-10
The Chancellor of Justice's proposal to align the Motor Vehicle Tax Act and the Road Traffic Act with the Basic Law.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The opposition is aimed at the previous failed legislation and the consequences of the Presidential veto, which led to an unreasonable situation. The criticism targets the procedure that forces people with disabilities to appeal to the administrative court, which is considered an illogical solution.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-03-26
Draft law amending the Church and Religious Communities Act (570 SE) – second reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The main opponents are the Centre Party faction, whose substantive amendments failed to gain support in the Legal Affairs Committee, and Varro Vooglaid, whose proposal to terminate the second reading was voted down. The criticism directed at the opponents focuses on procedural and substantive disagreements, emphasizing that the Centre Party’s proposals had already been taken into account by the Ministry of the Interior.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-03-26
Draft law amending the Constitution of the Republic of Estonia (536 SE) – Third Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

There is not enough data.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-03-20
Draft law (583 SE) for the first reading regarding accession to the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women and approval of amendment to Article 20, paragraph 1, of the Convention.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The confrontation is directed at the minister, whose political choices and capability in handling the economy are indirectly being called into question. The criticism is rather personal or procedural, suggesting that better cooperation would have been possible if the minister had simply made a different decision.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-03-20
First reading of the draft resolution of the Riigikogu, "Submitting a proposal to the Government of the Republic to close the temporary control line between the Republic of Estonia and the Russian Federation" (562 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

Criticism is aimed at the sponsors of the draft bill, who are suspected of lacking confidence in Estonia’s security agencies and the government. The opposition is more of a procedural matter and a question of institutional trust, rather than a direct political attack. He asks directly: "Do you not trust our security agencies?"
View Profile View Agenda
2025-03-19
Draft law amending the Penal Code and other laws in connection therewith (sanctions violations) (441 SE) – second reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

No direct political confrontation is being expressed, but disagreements are being addressed within the committee and between agencies regarding the expansion of the investigative powers of the Tax and Customs Board. The speaker rejected the proposal to quickly add this amendment to the draft bill, arguing that it would be unreasonable and would cause confusion. The criticism is procedural, not personal.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-03-18
Draft law amending the Political Parties Act and the Credit Institutions Act (585 SE) – first reading

Fifteenth Riigikogu, fifth sitting, plenary session

The confrontation is directed at EKRE and other parties who seek the swift rejection of the draft bill, and it is intense in refuting the false claims concerning the ERJK (Supervisory Committee on Party Financing). The speaker repeatedly refutes the assertion that the ERJK is a punitive body for one specific party or an organization controlled by the Social Democrats, demanding statistical proof from the opponents to back up their accusations. Criticism is also aimed at the opponents' claim that the bill supposedly appeared unexpectedly, with the speaker emphasizing that it has been debated for years.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-03-18
Draft law amending the Code of Civil Procedure (493 SE), second reading

Fifteenth Riigikogu, fifth sitting, plenary session

The primary source that raised concerns was the Ministry of Justice, which questioned extending the bill to cover litigation, fearing a slowdown in court proceedings. This opposition was procedural and policy-based, but the committee set it aside, finding that ensuring fundamental rights was the overriding priority. During the Legal Affairs Committee votes, one member consistently voted against procedural decisions.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-03-11
The Prime Minister's address for 2025 on the implementation of the long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035" (including an overview of the situation of research and development activities and the government's policy in this area).

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The criticism targets the government's (especially the Ministry of Climate's) administrative capability and inefficiency, demonstrated by the absence of required calculations on energy matters. The criticism is both procedural and forceful, highlighting the government's public failure ("you got hammered").
View Profile View Agenda
2025-02-19
Draft law amending the Church and Religious Communities Act (570 SE) – First Reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary sitting

The primary opposition is aimed at the political influence operations of the Moscow Patriarchate and the actions of Patriarch Kirill, who is accused of co-opting Orthodoxy for political interests that support killing and the destruction of human lives. He also neutrally notes the commission members who voted against (Varro Vooglaid and Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart), who were opposed to supporting the draft legislation.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-02-18
Draft resolution "Proposal to the Republic of Estonia's Government Regarding the Imposition of a Temporary Solidarity Tax on the Banking Sector" (535 OE) – First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The main criticism is aimed at the Centre Party, calling into question the feasibility of their election program and their current political influence (low support in the chamber). The opposition's draft bill is referred to as a "corpse" and it is suggested that it was created using AI, underscoring their political ineffectiveness. The former leadership of the Centre Party is also criticized, with the party being labeled a "dreadful party."
View Profile View Agenda
2025-02-12
Draft law amending the Code of Criminal Procedure and other laws (optimization of court proceedings and publicity of court decisions) (560 SE) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

Direct political opposition is not being voiced; rather, the criticism is leveled at the previous practice of releasing dangerous foreign criminals from prison without substantive review, solely for the purpose of financial savings. The speaker stands against any approach that severely violates the sense of justice or threatens public order.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-01-22
Draft law amending the Value Added Tax Act (539 SE) - First Reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session.

The main opponent is EKRE, whose bill is sharply criticized for both substantive errors (denial of the 400 million impact) and procedural flaws (insufficient explanatory memorandum, use of incorrect VAT rates). EKRE's claims regarding budget neutrality are considered "a total lie" and their logic is deemed incomprehensible. The criticism is intense and focuses on political irresponsibility.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-12-16
Overview of the Implementation of the Fundamentals of Criminal Policy until 2030

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

The speaker directly criticizes the opposition, specifically naming the Isamaa party and Jaanus Karilaid, who had criticized the cuts. The criticism is both procedural and political, faulting the opposition for demanding cuts while failing to propose concrete funding sources in their alternative draft bill. He defends the coalition's work, characterizing it as making inevitable and unpopular decisions in the interest of the state.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-12-11
Draft law amending the Code of Civil Procedure and other laws (establishing procedure for collective redress actions) – second reading (334 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

Specific political opponents or critics are neither named nor criticized. The only opposition addressed concerns the realistic nature of the directive's goal (the formation of consumer associations) within the Estonian cultural sphere, which necessitated the involvement of state institutions. The criticism is directed more towards the cultural and social context than towards political forces.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-20
Draft law amending the Constitution of the Republic of Estonia (536 SE) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

Direct criticism is leveled against the alternative draft amendment to the constitution, which provides for granting voting rights to citizens of third countries through international agreements, highlighting its legal complexity and lack of legal clarity. This stands in opposition to the principle of national basis, emphasizing that any restriction must be citizenship-based.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-19
Draft law amending the Code of Civil Procedure and, in consequence thereof, amending the Act on the Application of the Code of Civil Procedure and the Enforcement Procedure Act (493 SE) - first reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session.

The opposition was primarily procedural and substantive, focusing on the question of whether the Chancellor of Justice should have petitioned the Supreme Court and whether the amendment would increase the volume of civil litigation. Specific opponents (Anti Haugas, Valdo Randpere, Vilja Toomast) opposed the proposal within the committee to conclude the first reading.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-14
Draft Law Amending the Penal Code (490 SE) – First Reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session

The opposing side is the rapporteur who seeks to repeal § 151¹, and the criticism is directed both at the political solution and the rhetorical devices employed. The speaker accuses the opposing side of appealing to nationalism and highlighting inadequate individual cases, repeatedly asking for alternative solutions should the norm be abolished.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-13
Draft law amending the Land Register Act (467 SE) - third reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.

The opposition is directed at Isamaa’s speech, criticizing its irrelevance and deviation from the regulatory scope of the draft bill. The criticism is procedural, focusing on the fact that the opposing side introduced topics into the debate—specifically tax burden, major infrastructure lines, and electricity supply—which were unrelated to the law currently under discussion.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-06
Second reading of the draft law amending the Land Register Act (467 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

There is no objection; the speaker is focusing on addressing the concerns raised by stakeholders (the Estonian Banking Association, the Private Forest Union) and finding compromises. Instead of criticism, it is emphasized that the Ministry of Justice provided clarifications and solutions were found with which "all parties were satisfied."
View Profile View Agenda
2024-10-17
Draft law amending the Code of Civil Procedure Implementation Act and the Enforcement Proceedings Implementation Act (439 SE) – First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting

The main opposition is directed at the content of Draft Bill 439 SE and its author, Mart Maastik. The criticism is strictly policy-based and legal-technical, highlighting the bill's legal uncertainty and the suspicion of unconstitutionality. The speaker denies having selectively interpreted the proceedings of the Legal Affairs Committee.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-10-16
Draft law amending the Prison Law (506 SE) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

There is no direct opposition or criticism regarding the content or procedure of the draft bill. The speaker neutrally reports on questions raised by other committee members (e.g., Ando Kiviberg) concerning the timing and budget of the amendment.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-10-14
Draft law amending the Family Benefits Act and other laws (507 SE) – first reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting

The opposition is indirect, merely noting that right-wing parties are concerned over the income cap for parental benefits. The text also mentions the Social Democrats' swift opposition to the alternative proposal of reducing the parental benefit period, which the speaker views positively. Therefore, the Social Democrats are not opponents on this specific issue.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-10-10
Draft law amending the Child Protection Act and other laws (427 SE) – second reading

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth sitting, plenary session.

Direct opponents are not criticized, but the speaker indirectly criticizes the process of drafting the bill, which has caused "confusion" in parliament. The criticism is aimed at the lack of clarity in the bill, which could create the impression that pedophiles are permitted to work with children.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-09-25
Draft law amending the Penal Code and other laws in consequence thereof (offence-based sanctions) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session

Insufficient data. The speech focuses on the commission's consensus decision and does not mention any opposition or criticize other political parties.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-09-25
The Regional Affairs and Agricultural Minister's 2024 presentation on the implementation of the state’s long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035"

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session

The criticism is aimed at the current deficiencies and market failures in regional policy; it is not personal. The intensity is moderate, presenting the issues in the form of questions, which suggests concern rather than a direct attack.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-09-17
Report by the Chancellor of Justice on the compliance of legal instruments with the Constitution and the performance of other duties imposed on the Chancellor of Justice by law.

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

Direct adversaries are not criticized; instead, the criticism is aimed at systemic injustice and the inability of institutions (the Parliament, the Minister) to ensure justice, which is reflected in the Chancellor of Justice's alarming statement. The criticism is procedural and system-based.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-09-16
2024 Report by the Minister of the Interior on the Implementation of the State's Long-Term Development Strategy "Estonia 2035"

The 15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting.

The criticism is aimed at general critics of state spending who argue that the state is "bloated" and has too many officials, stressing that the internal security sector has already been "streamlined to the bone." Reference is also made to external attempts to destabilize Estonian society and frighten people.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-06-13
Financial Supervision Authority 2023 Annual Report

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session

Direct criticism is aimed at the ministries where the issue of establishing a financial ombudsman has stalled, bogged down by the unresolved question of binding and non-binding decisions. Furthermore, concern is expressed regarding the proliferation of unregulated lending activity (e.g., in Facebook groups), which requires the attention of the Financial Supervision Authority.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-06-13
Bank of Estonia 2023 Report

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session

The criticism is aimed at the banking sector, particularly concerning high interest margins and a lack of solidarity, a fact which the Bank of Estonia has also acknowledged. The speaker also challenges the Bank of Estonia's stance on not supporting the bank tax, requesting a detailed justification for this position.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-06-11
First Reading of the Riigikogu Draft Statement "On the Crisis of Democracy in Georgia" (449 AE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.

There is no direct confrontation with political groups, but the speaker challenges the direction of the current Georgia policy pursued by the Foreign Minister and the government, demanding an explanation for the shift from historical support to confrontation.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-06-06
Proposal by the Chancellor of Justice for bringing the regulation concerning the building prohibition zone of the Nature Conservation Act into compliance with the Constitution

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The opposition is not directed at specific political opponents, but rather at hypothetical "malicious actors" who might abuse the legal amendments. Emphasis is placed on the risk that the amendment provides an opportunity to circumvent restrictions within the shore protection zone.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-06-06
Proposal of the Chancellor of Justice for bringing the Code of Civil Procedure into conformity with the Constitution

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The main confrontation is with the Office of the Chancellor of Justice and those who found that a constitutional infringement exists. The speaker relays the arguments of the Ministry of Justice, which dispute the existence of the constitutional infringement and emphasize the adequacy of judicial discretion. The confrontation is purely legal and procedural, not personal.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-30
Discussion of the nationally important issue: "How can the state avoid living in debt?"

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting

The direct political opponent is not criticized, but the speaker casts doubt on the common understanding—or the argument put forth by their discussion partners—that large debt will not lead to long-term negative consequences. The criticism is aimed instead at the justification of financial irresponsibility or short-sightedness, using Greece as an example.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-29
First reading of the Riigikogu Draft Resolution "Supporting the Introduction of Nuclear Energy in Estonia" (431 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The opposition is directed against the legislative approach chosen by the bill's initiators, criticizing it as premature and insufficiently analyzed. The criticism is both procedural and policy-based, focusing on the logical fallacy of expressing support prior to investigation.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-29
First reading of the Bill amending the Land Tax Act (437 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The criticism targets previous governments and politicians ("the various people in the government here on my left") who neglected to carry out the mandatory land valuation for 20 years. The objection is both procedural and based on the failure of political performance, directly linking that past inaction to the current tax burden.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-16
Debate on the matter of national importance initiated by the Economic Affairs Committee: "How to increase productivity in the Estonian economy?"

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session

The criticism targets systemic deficiencies, such as inadequate infrastructure development and state regulations that hinder business growth. No direct political opponents or specific individuals are being criticized; instead, the emphasis is placed on the state's ability to handle these issues.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-15
First Reading of the Draft Act Amending the Social Welfare Act and Other Acts (Special Welfare Services and Changing the Address of Residence) (421 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

There is no opposition. The speech emphasizes the Social Affairs Committee's unanimity and consensual decisions in advancing the proceedings of the bill, noting that all procedural decisions were made by consensus.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-13
Proposal by the Chancellor of Justice for bringing the Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Prevention Act, the Credit Institutions Act, the Law of Obligations Act, and the State Fees Act into conformity with the Constitution

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session

Criticism is aimed at the activities of banks that close accounts without providing substantial justification and may use consumer loan contracts that are not compliant with Estonian law. The bureaucracy is also criticized for legally stalling the creation of the financial ombudsman position, despite the Financial Supervision Authority itself acknowledging the necessity of such a role.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-09
Debate on the matter of significant national importance: "E-elections – a threat to democracy."

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The main opponents are EKRE and formerly the Centre Party, who are criticized for spearheading the anti-e-voting campaign and polarizing society. The criticism targets political tactics based on casting doubt on election results and undermining the government's legitimacy, rather than being based on facts. The speaker notes ironically that EKRE failed to find any evidence of fraud even when they themselves held the responsible ministerial posts.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-02
First Reading of the Riigikogu Draft Statement (420 AE) "On Declaring the Moscow Patriarchate an Institution Supporting the Military Aggression of the Russian Federation"

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The primary opponents are those members of the Riigikogu who are attempting to discredit the statement in question and withhold support for the draft bill. The criticism is intense and principled, directly asking whether these individuals truly understand who or what they are currently standing up for. The opponents are being reproached for failing to recognize the danger and for defending ideological aggression.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-04-18
Discussion of the matter of significant national importance, initiated by the Environmental Committee, titled "The necessity and possibilities of introducing nuclear energy in Estonia"

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The criticism targets the procedure and the overall political indecisiveness stemming from the lack of clear alternatives. Specific opponents or groups are not being criticized; rather, there is a demand for better preparation for decision-making.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-04-16
The Minister of Culture's 2024 Report on the Implementation of the State's Long-Term Development Strategy "Estonia 2035" (including the implementation of the "Estonian Sports Policy Fundamentals until 2030")

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

There is not enough data.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-04-16
Third Reading of the Draft Act amending the Health Insurance Act and related Acts (Prevention of Incapacity for Work) (Bill 377 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

There is absolutely no opposition; the speech is focused solely on acknowledgment and highlighting the positive aspects of the bill.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-04-09
Report by the Minister of Economic Affairs and Information Technology on the implementation of the state's long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035"

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The criticism is directed at the effectiveness of the government's performance in attracting investment, expressing concern that Estonia's Minister of Economic Affairs is not successful enough compared to their Latvian counterpart. The criticism is aimed at improving performance, not personal.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-03-19
The 2024 Report by the Minister of Health on the implementation of the state's long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035"

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The criticism is aimed at the current management and funding of the healthcare system, which has led to issues with underfunding and accessibility. The opposition is rooted in policy and systemic issues, demanding stronger control and direction from the state over hospital operations.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-02-22
First Reading of the Draft Act Amending the Local Government Council Election Act (287 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting

The confrontation is directed at the bill's rapporteur and supporters, who are criticized for their insufficient trust in people's choices. The criticism is philosophical and political, calling into question the necessity of the restrictions and the assumption that electoral alliances are more unstable than political parties.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-02-21
First Reading of the Draft Law on the Denunciation of the Agreement between the Republic of Estonia and the Russian Federation on Legal Assistance and Legal Relations in Civil, Family, and Criminal Matters (362 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The primary suspicion and criticism are directed against the actions and intentions of the Russian Federation, raising the question of whether the neighboring state completely lacks the will to implement the agreement in good faith. Russia is viewed as a party with whom any cooperation generates questions.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-02-21
Second Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Estonian Cultural Endowment Act and the Gambling Tax Act (338 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The primary opposition is directed at the Isamaa party and colleague Priit Sibul, who recommended not supporting the draft bill. Speaker B criticizes Isamaa's approach as unacceptable and rejects Sibula's claim that the bill offers a "backdoor" solution, proposing the term "parallel door" instead. The criticism targets both political positions and procedural resistance.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-02-20
First reading of the draft statement of the Riigikogu "On the Return to Ukraine of Children Deported by Russia" (375 AE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

There is no opposition; the focus is on positive action and support. The indirect opposition is directed at Russia's actions, which are considered "crazy."
View Profile View Agenda
2024-02-07
First Reading of the Bill to Amend the Income Tax Act (230 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting.

The primary criticism is directed at banks due to their significant profitability and insufficient social solidarity, especially in the context of high loan interest rates. Furthermore, the government's (coalition's) "hectic" and unstable tax policy is being criticized, as it might undermine financial stability. Responding to Martin Helme, the consistency of the Social Democrats on the bank tax issue is defended, refuting the claim of a 180-degree turn.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-02-07
First Reading of the Bill Amending the Act on the Restriction of Acquisition of Immovable Property (284 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting.

There is too little data.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-18
Debate on the National Issue of Crucial Importance: "Strong Rural Schools and a Strong School Network"

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The criticism targets the structural contradictions inherent in the policy, particularly the conflict between the "bottom-up principle" and the desire for reform. The speaker notes that this conflict has resulted in disputes between communities and local authorities, often involving top-tier politicians, thereby highlighting the failure of policy implementation.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-11
First reading of the Bill for the Amendment of the Vital Statistics Registration Act (106 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

There is no opposition; the speaker is focusing on clarifying and amending the details of the draft bill to ensure that health aspects are taken into consideration.
View Profile View Agenda
Back to Profiling