By Agendas: Riina Sikkut

Total Agendas: 80

Fully Profiled: 80

2025-10-15
First Reading of the Draft Act Amending the Law on the Election of the President of the Republic (684 SE)

The 15th Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting

Direct confrontation with specific opponents is absent; instead, criticism is leveled at the unintended legislative consequence brought about by the administrative reform (specifically, the proportions of the electoral college). It is noted that because broad-based support was lacking, not all desired amendments could be included in the draft bill, but this is considered more of a procedural observation.
2025-10-13
809 On the Future of the Climate Law

15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The criticism is aimed at the Reform Party and the Prime Minister (Michal) for their previous political decisions, which resulted in prioritizing a massive piece of legislation and causing subsequent delays. The opposition is both political and procedural, highlighting the inconsistency and delay in the handling of the bill, and questioning the softening of the original targets.
2025-10-13
Interpellation concerning the necessity and timeliness of establishing a general quiet period during the breeding season (No. 804)

15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The criticism is aimed at the ministry's (or the minister's) potential sluggishness or resistance regarding the deregulation of nature conservation. The confrontation is procedural and political, suggesting that the analysis was commissioned precisely because the ministry was not acting fast enough.
2025-10-13
Inquiry concerning the revenue base of local governments (No. 802)

15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The objection is aimed at the inability of government representatives (including Jürgen Ligi) to explain the state budget amendments in simple language, particularly in the context of the revenue base for local municipalities. The criticism is both procedural and political, focusing on the lack of clarity in communication and the potential negative impact of the changes.
2025-10-13
First Reading of the Draft Legislation (736 SE) on the Amendment of the State Budget Act and the Act Amending the State Budget Act

15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The primary confrontation is with the government, which is being criticized for easing the budget rule and increasing bureaucracy. The criticism is policy- and procedure-based, accusing the government of tailoring the rules to fit its own strategy. The opposition is intense, as the sustainability of the nation's finances is being called into question.
2025-10-13
First reading of the Draft Act on the Amendment of the Act on Simplified Taxation of Business Income and the Income Tax Act, and the Act on the Repeal of the Security Tax Act and the Amendment of the Income Tax Act (Bill 734 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

Strong opposition to the governing coalition, which is being criticized for irresponsible policies, short-sightedness, and breaking promises. The criticism is aimed both at the substance of the policy (tax cuts financed by borrowed money) and at the actions of the politicians (Prime Minister Kristen Michal, the Minister of Finance) and their inability to justify the tax hikes. The politician is extremely critical and shows no willingness to compromise regarding the current policies.
2025-10-13
First Reading of the Draft Act on the Ratification of the Agreement between the Republic of Estonia and the Principality of Liechtenstein for the Avoidance of Double Taxation with respect to Taxes on Income and Capital and the Prevention of Tax Evasion and Tax Fraud, and the Protocol thereto (718 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

No data available.
2025-10-08
Continuation of the first reading of the Draft Law on the State Budget for 2026 (737 SE)

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The main targets of criticism are the governing coalition, the prime minister, and the finance minister, all of whom are being accused of avoiding responsibility and displaying political short-sightedness. The criticism is intense and centers on specific policy choices, particularly the favoring of the wealthy and the exacerbation of social inequality. The opposition is absolute, with a motion being put forward to reject the budget during its first reading.
2025-10-07
First Reading of the 2026 State Budget Bill (737 SE)

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The primary target is the minister and the government's budget strategy, which is being criticized for unrealistic long-term fiscal planning. The criticism is policy-driven and centers on the minister's excessive optimism that society will be able to reach a consensus regarding massive tax hikes. The intensity of the attack is moderate, focusing on arguments rather than individuals.
2025-10-07
Interpellation concerning the unspent budget funds of the Ministry of Education and Research (No. 805)

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

There is no direct confrontation, but the speech contains indirect procedural criticism aimed at the minister, emphasizing that budget management and the setting of metrics are purely the minister's decision. The criticism is directed at improving management quality, not personal in nature.
2025-10-06
Interpellation regarding failure in Basic School final examinations (No. 800)

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The criticism targets the current passive approach, which permits schools in weaker local governments to close without offering adequate proactive support. The confrontation is policy-driven, demanding concrete steps from the minister to rectify the situation.
2025-10-06
Interpellation concerning the insufficient state funding of school meals and the resulting inequality (No. 797)

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The criticism is aimed at the actions of the minister and the government, who are attempting to shift the responsibility for funding school meals onto local municipalities. The speaker demands that the state assume responsibility, as the state is also a school operator.
2025-09-23
Inquiry regarding the cessation of number plate recognition cameras (no. 793)

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session

The direct opposing party is not criticized, but the text indirectly opposes the viewpoint that favors outdated working methods ("using a standard pencil and binoculars") when dealing with criminals who utilize technology. The criticism is primarily directed at the policy's lack of ambition concerning technological solutions.
2025-09-22
Inquiry Regarding the Bringing of Swedish Prisoners to Estonia (No. 792)

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session

The primary confrontation is directed at the government and the prime minister, whose policies are being criticized for ignoring the strategic direction (high productivity) and for failing to conduct adequate cost and resource analysis. The criticism is policy- and procedure-based, focusing specifically on the failure to cover security, healthcare, and economic expenditures.
2025-09-22
Request for information regarding the establishment of a business council and the potential conflicts of interest of its members (no. 788)

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session

The primary criticism targets the structure of the government and the post of the Minister of Entrepreneurship, hinting at its potential redundancy given the need for cost savings. The speaker views the prime minister's actions as an indirect vote of no confidence against Minister Erkki Keldo—a move that constitutes both a procedural and political attack.
2025-09-18
Bank of Estonia 2024 Report

15th Estonian Parliament, 6th sitting, plenary session.

The main criticism is directed at the government, which is accused of irresponsible fiscal policy and making short-term decisions that increase the debt burden. The criticism is policy- and procedure-based, highlighting that the government’s agreements run completely contrary to the strong recommendations of the Fiscal Council. The governing power is described as a party that cannot be compelled to act responsibly.
2025-09-17
Re-examination of the Act Amending the Act Preventing Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing and the Act on International Sanctions (640 UA), which was not announced by the President of the Republic

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting.

The opposition is aimed at colleagues who employ excessive emotion (such as talking "about totalitarianism, who about raccoons") or make unrealistic appeals to avoid discussing the issues. Direct criticism was leveled at Kalle Grünthal for misrepresenting the speaker's position, particularly regarding the Eesti 200 concept of a "personal state," which the speaker actually opposes due to its privacy-infringing nature.
2025-09-17
State finances

Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, press briefing.

The primary target is the prime minister and the government, who are being slammed for drawing up an irresponsible budget and implementing ineffective tax solutions. The criticism is intense and policy-driven, with opponents accusing the government of making decisions that amount to a gift for the wealthiest. They are also being called out for using incorrect figures in their mathematical calculations.
2025-09-16
The Chancellor of Justice's report on the conformity of legislative acts with the Constitution and the performance of other duties assigned to the Chancellor by law.

Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.

No direct opposition is voiced towards specific individuals or groups. The indirect criticism is aimed at the quality of the parliament's legislation, which generates extra work for the Chancellor of Justice, citing the potential unfairness or ambiguity of the laws.
2025-09-15
Inquiry regarding educational inequality (no. 795)

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting

Insufficient data
2025-09-15
Inquiry Regarding Differences in Teacher Salaries (no. 790)

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting

The criticism is aimed at the existing problems with education funding and salary payments, especially concerning teachers leaving critical subjects. Specific opponents are not named; instead, questions are posed to the minister regarding the shortcomings of the current solutions, demanding that alternatives be considered.
2025-09-15
An inquiry regarding the hindrance of development in the defence industry (no 783)

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting

The opposition is directed at the minister, whose claim regarding the absence of a delay is being called into question. The criticism is procedural and is based on a contradiction in statements, citing contrary information from the head of the Defence Industry Association concerning the actual length of the delay.
2025-09-11
The Financial Supervision Authority's 2024 Report

15th Riigikogu, 6th plenary sitting

No data available.
2025-09-11
Draft law amending the Holiday and Commemoration Day Act (636 SE) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session

Criticism is directed against the government, accusing it of rapidly and extensively changing its political positions on crucial issues. The opposition is procedural, demanding clarity regarding the government's actual support for the bill, given its previous reversals. The criticism is aimed at the policy, not the individuals.
2025-09-10
First reading of the draft law on civil crisis and state defense

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session

The primary opposition is directed at the government’s approach and the consensus decision made by the State Defence Committee concerning the mandatory establishment of shelters. The criticism is policy- and rationale-based, calling into question the justifications presented by the Minister of Defence, who used young families to rationalize postponing the construction of shelters.
2025-09-09
The Minister of Defence's 2025 presentation on the implementation of the state's long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035"

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session.

The primary criticism is aimed at the system overseen by the minister, centering on procedural deficiencies and the absence of financial accountability. The critique is procedural in nature and calls for systemic change, raising the question of whether accountability rests with a single individual or if the fault lies within the system itself. The intensity of the attack is moderate yet insistent, ironically suggesting the implementation of the "14 eyes principle."
2025-09-08
Inquiry Regarding the Development of Nuclear Energy in Estonia (No. 786)

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session

The opposition is directed against the policy of developing nuclear energy, criticizing its economic justification and inherent risks. The criticism is strictly policy-driven, focusing on the waste of resources and the assumption of long-term liabilities. In a separate address, a procedural objection was raised regarding the minister's request to substantiate the claims, demanding that the proper format be used for this purpose.
2025-09-08
Inquiry regarding the government's plans to increase immigration (no. 791)

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session

The primary criticism is aimed at the government and the Reform Party, particularly concerning their policies on immigration quotas and salary criteria. Critics point out the government’s desire to allow in roughly three times the official quota of skilled workers without formally amending the quota, arguing that this fails to address the underlying issues. Furthermore, the government is accused of seeking an easy fix through immigration exceptions instead of making the necessary effort to retrain the 65,000 unemployed individuals.
2025-09-08
Inquiry regarding the loss of essential banking services from county centers (no. 773)

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session

The opposition's criticism is aimed at Lauri Laats (Mustamäe), who is being criticized for his lack of understanding of regional policy. The stance towards the minister is demanding, requesting concrete metrics based on which he could be declared unsuccessful, thus calling into question his ability to perform as regional minister.
2025-09-08
Inquiry regarding regulations concerning end-of-life issues (no. 766)

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session

The criticism is aimed at the political infighting that is hindering meaningful debate regarding the regulation of assisted suicide. Specific opponents or groups are not named; instead, the focus is placed on the necessity of overcoming this political standoff.
2025-09-04
Chair implementation

15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu

The main opponents are the government and its ministers, who are criticized for the lack of policy substance and strategic vision. The criticism is policy-driven, accusing the government of taking societal risks (such as bringing in prisoners and lowering the gambling tax) and increasing the tax burden on low-income earners. The criticism is intense and demands concrete mitigation measures.
2025-06-12
A written request for a vote of no confidence in Justice and Digital Minister Liisa-Ly Pakostale, submitted by 42 members of the Riigikogu.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The main opponent is Minister of Justice Liisa-Ly Pakosta and the government, who are being criticized both for their political priorities (prison leasing, casino taxes) and for unethical conduct. The speaker vehemently refutes the minister’s claims that he/she supposedly supported renting out the prison, labeling these claims as outright lies.
2025-06-12
Draft Law on Song and Dance Celebrations (598 SE) – First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

There is no direct confrontation aimed at political opponents or groups; instead, the criticism is directed at the operational unit's potential decision-making authority, which could generate resentment within established collectives.
2025-06-12
Draft Law Amending the Employment Contracts Act and Other Acts (602 SE) – First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The main opponent is the minister/government submitting the draft legislation, who is being criticized both for the substance of the policy (damaging the economy) and the procedure (improper preparation of the bill). The criticism is intense, asserting that the draft legislation is diametrically opposed to the necessary economic measures and IMF recommendations. Furthermore, the minister’s claims regarding the long-term preparation of the bill are also being called into question.
2025-06-12
Second reading of the draft law amending the Health Services Organisation Act, the Unemployment Insurance Act, and other related acts, as well as amending the Act on Support for Working Capacity (604 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

There is no direct confrontation; the speaker addresses the aspects raised by colleagues (e.g., the free slot mentioned by Priit Sibul) constructively and supportively.
2025-06-11
Second reading of the draft law on the state's supplementary budget for 2025 (651 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The confrontation is primarily aimed at ideological opponents who criticize the irresponsible monetary policy ("money comes from inside the wall"). Criticism is also directed at the government's fiscal policy, which focuses on technical matters but fails to cover permanent expenditures with permanent revenues or consider the long-term effects of its decisions. Furthermore, regional policy is criticized for creating inequality and forced migration between local municipalities.
2025-06-11
Draft law amending the simplified taxation act for entrepreneurs and the income tax act, and repealing the security tax act – second reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The main opponents are the government and the Reform Party, who are criticized for their ideological choices and for breaking political promises. The criticism is intense and targets both political injustice (the abolition of the tax hump) and the lack of credibility shown by Prime Minister Kristen Michal when making the security tax permanent. The opposition culminates in a proposal to interrupt the second reading.
2025-06-11
Draft law (641 SE) for the ratification of the agreement between the Republic of Estonia and the Republic of Botswana for the avoidance of double taxation in relation to income taxes, and for preventing tax evasion and tax fraud, and its associated protocol - second reading.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

There is no objection; the speaker emphasizes that neither members of the Riigikogu, nor factions, nor committees submitted any amendments to the draft bill. Consequently, no opposing party or their viewpoints are being criticized.
2025-06-11
Continuation of the second reading of the draft law amending the Competition Act and, in connection therewith, amending other laws (609 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

Strong criticism has been directed at the coalition partners Eesti 200 (Margus Tsahkna) and Minister of Justice Liisa Pakosta, who are accused of delaying the processing of the draft bill and rejecting an earlier, acceptable solution. The former Minister of Justice, Lea Danilson-Järg, is also criticized for failing to bring the draft legislation before the government. The critique targets procedural missteps and political unwillingness, which have led to an ineffective outcome.
2025-06-10
Draft law amending the Competition Act and, in consequence, amending other laws (609 SE) - second reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.

The primary criticism is aimed at the Eesti 200 party and its ministers (Margus Tsahkna, Liisa Pakosta), who are being accused of politically overstating the importance of competition law while neglecting consumer protection. The criticism is intense and directly questions whether the government is prioritizing business interests over consumers.
2025-06-10
The Chairman of the Supreme Court’s overview of court orders, the administration of justice, and the uniform application of laws.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.

Direct opponents are not criticized, but the consequences of political disputes (such as pension reform or obstruction) that burden the Supreme Court are highlighted. The criticism is aimed at procedural and political decisions that create legal ambiguity and resource problems within the judicial system.
2025-06-05
Discussion of the significant national issue initiated by the Economics Committee: "How to increase productivity in the Estonian economy?"

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session.

The criticism targets the current economic model and historical dependencies that have resulted in low-value exports and the prioritization of foreign capital. Swedish influence (banks, currency, exports) is highlighted as the root cause of decades of economic instability. The opposition is based on policy and structure, not personal issues.
2025-06-04
Draft law (642 SE) on the withdrawal from the convention prohibiting the use, stockpiling, production and transfer of anti-personnel mines and requiring their destruction – second reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The opposition is aimed at specific colleagues, criticizing Helir-Valdor Seeder for his simplistic and nuance-insensitive approach to assessing the security threat—an approach that fails to account for the changes in the situation since 2004. Kalle Grünthal’s position regarding the use of mines without withdrawing from the convention is deemed absolutely untenable, as it does not provide the Defence Forces with a legal avenue for procurement.
2025-06-04
2025 supplementary budget

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing

The criticism is directed at the complex implementation of the government's policy (car tax exceptions) and the system's unsuitability for solving social concerns. It also criticizes the issue of trust in politicians, citing the previous cooperation between the Centre Party (Keskerakond) and EKREIKE as an example.
2025-06-03
The Minister of Public Administration's 2025 presentation on the implementation of the state's long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035"

Fifteenth Riigikogu, fifth session, plenary session

The main conflict is with the Minister of Infrastructure, whose policies are ineffective in achieving strategic objectives and who denies the political nature of the sector. Direct criticism is also leveled at the Prime Minister, who does not support an evidence-based penalty point system aimed at reducing the number of traffic fatalities. The criticism is policy- and procedure-based, focusing on the deviation from established goals.
2025-06-03
Inquiry Regarding the Establishment of Tallinn Hospital (no 762)

15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session

The main criticism is directed at the former Centre Party-led Tallinn city government, which is accused of obstructing the consolidation of hospitals over a period of ten years. The government’s/minister’s delay and illogical approach, which favors a phased transition over a comprehensive solution, are also criticized. The speaker notes that opposition or disagreements regarding major changes are normal and should not be allowed to delay the decision.
2025-06-03
Inquiry Regarding the Pihlakodu Case and the Safety of Care Homes (no. 750)

15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session

The criticism targets shortcomings in state accountability and oversight regarding the outsourcing of general institutional care services to the private sector. The opposition is policy-driven, requiring assurance that the delegation is economically justified and guarantees service that is equivalent to or better than that provided by municipal care homes.
2025-06-02
An inquiry regarding the narrowing scope of Estonian as a language of scientific study and the quality of university education (no. 764)

15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session

Lack of data
2025-06-02
Inquiry regarding the qualification requirements for youth workers (no. 745)

15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session

There is no direct opposition; the speaker is posing risk analysis questions to the Minister concerning project-based funding and the decentralization of responsibility, in order to identify potential issues in youth work.
2025-06-02
Inquiry Regarding the Pihlakodu Case and the Prosecutor's Office Activities (no 748)

15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session

There is no direct opposition or criticism. While the speaker does acknowledge the previous unfortunate remarks, they simultaneously commend the minister's explanations, thereby avoiding a personal or political attack.
2025-06-02
First reading of the draft law on the state's supplementary budget for 2025 (651 SE)

15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session

The primary criticism is leveled against the government and the Minister of Finance, who stand accused of delaying the resolution of budget problems until after the 2027 elections. The government is also criticized for fiscal maneuvering, specifically accelerating one-off expenditures to ensure compliance with budget rules in subsequent years. The criticism is rooted in both policy and procedure, and also involves ideological disagreements (for example, regarding the reduction of VAT on foodstuffs).
2025-05-21
Draft law amending the Securities Market Act and, in consequence thereof, amending other laws (588 SE) – third reading

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.

The pushback is aimed at those who criticize the draft bill as totalitarianism or state overreach, clearly referencing conservative circles and Varro Vooglaid. The speaker refutes claims regarding the lack of competent women and defends the state’s right to impose rules on certain large companies. The criticism targets political stances that question the necessity of regulation.
2025-05-21
Continuation of the first reading of the draft law amending the Income Tax Act for Entrepreneurs, the Security Tax Act, and the Income Tax Act (645 SE)

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.

The opposition is directed at the government's tax bill (645 SE), particularly the increase in value-added tax (VAT), which is considered unfair to low-wage earners. The criticism is policy-based and focuses on the inequity in the distribution of the tax burden. Maris Lauri's statement is mentioned to confirm the opposing viewpoint regarding the progressive income tax.
2025-05-20
Draft law amending the Enterprise Income Tax Simplification Act, the Security Tax Act, and the Income Tax Act (645 SE) – First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The main opponent is the government and the Minister of Finance (Jürgen Ligi), who is being criticized for ignoring IMF recommendations and breaking the promise of tax peace. The criticism is intense and politically charged, accusing the government of making incorrect choices that inhibit economic growth. The opposition culminates in the submission of a proposal to reject the draft bill.
2025-05-20
Draft law (641 SE) for the ratification of the agreement between the Republic of Estonia and the Republic of Botswana for the avoidance of double taxation in respect of income taxes, and for the prevention of tax evasion and fiscal fraud, and of the protocol thereto – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

No data available.
2025-05-20
Inquiry Regarding Electrical Power Generation Capacities (No. 746)

15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.

The primary opponent is the government and the minister, who is being criticized for the weak arguments used when making strategic energy decisions. Criticism is also directed at the government’s procedural activities, particularly concerning non-public lobby meetings and the inconsistency of legislation.
2025-05-19
Inquiry Regarding Estonian Environmental Policy (No. 743)

15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.

The primary opposition is aimed at the minister and the government, challenging their core values (specifically, treating the forest as a commodity/asset) and their procedural methodology. The criticism focuses on the speed with which specific decisions are adopted (such as the 70% limit or the special planning for the nuclear power plant) and the simultaneous lack of a strategic foundation, which is viewed as a fundamental contradiction.
2025-05-19
An inquiry regarding the illegal alteration of the order of protection of natural objects (no. 738)

15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.

The primary opposition is directed at the minister and the government's actions, which are being criticized for initiating the designation of target protection zones in a manner that is both unlawful and procedurally flawed. The criticism is intense and focuses strictly on legal correctness, rather than on individuals.
2025-05-19
Inquiry regarding labor productivity, Estonia's competitiveness, and cheap labor (no. 742)

15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.

The criticism targets the consequences of potential political decisions by the government or minister (specifically, lowering wage demands) and issues related to budgetary planning. This constitutes policy-based criticism, which calls for accountability and solutions, rather than resorting to personal attacks.
2025-05-15
The Minister of Education and Research's 2025 presentation on the implementation of the state's long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035"

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

Direct opposition is not voiced, but questions are being asked and additional measures are being demanded from the Minister of Education to support mathematics instruction. The criticism is aimed at the policy's potential shortcomings, not at individuals.
2025-05-14
Draft law amending the Securities Market Act and, in consequence thereof, amending other laws (588 SE) – second reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session

The speaker sharply criticizes those who deem women less competent or whose attitudes obstruct competent women from reaching leadership positions. They reject the claims that quotas introduce incompetent individuals into boards and label such an attitude prejudiced. Furthermore, they systematically distance themselves from the topics of transgenderism being raised, considering them issues "imported from across the ocean" that have little relevance to the processes currently underway in Estonia.
2025-05-06
Inquiry regarding the future of the ferry connection (no. 739)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The opposition is directed at the minister’s expressed surprise or expectation that ferry services should be self-sustaining. The criticism is politically and economically justified, emphasizing the inevitability of state aid in securing connections for sparsely populated areas.
2025-05-06
Inquiry regarding the reorganization of Kehtna Vocational Education Centre and Vana-Vigala Technical and Service School (no 733)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The opposition is aimed at the centralizing policy of the government or ministry, which will result in the closure or restructuring of rural schools. The criticism focuses on the policy itself and its consequences, pointing out that the decision to close the schools "wipes the entire region off the map."
2025-05-06
Inquiry Regarding the Disruption of Railway Construction in Rohuküla (No. 731)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The confrontation is aimed at the actions of the minister and the government, who plan to halt the construction of the Rohuküla railway and amend the national spatial plan. The criticism is based on policy and procedure, sharply questioning whether the foundations of the public transport reform are set to be changed and what will happen to the existing CO2 funds. The speaker disputes the government’s actions, which contradict previous state decisions.
2025-05-05
Inquiry Regarding Rural Areas (no. 713)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

There is no information regarding the criticism of opponents or confrontations, as this is a question posed to the minister concerning the plans for his portfolio.
2025-05-05
Inquiry regarding the social welfare reform (no 720)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

Criticism is directed at the government's actions (specifically the minister) concerning the implementation of the care reform and its financial management. The opposition is policy-based, stressing that the reform’s financial model failed to account for the reality of rapid inflation. The issue points to the expectation that the government should be capable of explaining the dynamics behind service pricing.
2025-05-05
Inquiry regarding amendments to the Employment Contracts Act, or regarding occasional work contracts (no. 735)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The backlash targets the bill's proponents (including the minister and Raimond Kaljulaid), criticizing both the substance of the draft legislation and its procedural execution (specifically, the lack of broader debate). The most pointed criticism addresses the opposing side's assumptions regarding employee motivation, viewing their premise about earning a financial buffer as completely divorced from reality.
2025-05-05
Draft law amending the Competition Act and, in connection therewith, amending other laws (609 SE) - first reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The opposition is directed at those who consider harsh penalties negative and undermine the competence of the Competition Authority. Varro Vooglaid's views on the topic of democracy are criticized separately. Strong political opposition is aimed at the minister, from whom political accountability and resignation are demanded if the transposition of the directive proves incorrect.
2025-04-24
Debate on the nationally significant issue "The Drawbacks of Wind Power," initiated by the faction of the Estonian Conservative People's Party.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The oppositional stance is extremely strong and directed against the disseminators of misinformation, who are accused of employing pseudoscience and fearmongering. A specific individual with a medical background is heavily criticized for making unethical and non-evidence-based claims regarding birth defects. Furthermore, Anti Poolamets is also criticized for presenting planning volumes that are both exaggerated and unrealistic.
2025-04-23
Draft law amending the Health Services Organisation Act (advance directive of a patient’s end-of-life will) – first reading (604 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

There is no confrontation; the speaker focuses on addressing the deficiencies in the existing legal framework, rather than criticizing opponents. The problem is instead viewed as the current law's inability to ensure the implementation of the wishes of the elderly and those lacking decision-making capacity.
2025-04-23
Second reading of the draft law amending the Electricity Market Act (555 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The criticism is directed at the government and successive climate ministers, accusing them of making piecemeal energy decisions without the necessary strategic, holistic view. The criticism is primarily procedural, emphasizing the expectation that the government should act to bring ENMAK before the Riigikogu.
2025-04-23
Third reading of the draft law amending the Tobacco Act (223 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

There is no direct political confrontation being voiced, but manufacturers of tobacco and nicotine products are being heavily criticized. The criticism is aimed at their marketing strategies, which are deliberately focused on cultivating new consumers among young people by using appealing flavors and childlike designs.
2025-04-22
The Minister of Culture's 2025 presentation on the implementation of the state's long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035" (including the implementation of "The Fundamentals of Estonian Sports Policy until 2030")

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The criticism is aimed at the government or the ministry, which approaches culture too pragmatically and treats it as a mere allocation item within the budget context. The disagreement is based on policy and procedure, focusing on inadequate wages and the lack of social guarantees in the cultural sector, despite the field's high achievements.
2025-04-16
Second reading of the draft law amending the Tobacco Act (223 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session

The criticism targets the protracted legislative process and previous political obstruction, which postponed the adoption of a sensible amendment for nearly two years. Specific opponents are not named individually; rather, the focus is on procedural inefficiency and regret over the delay in the amendment taking effect.
2025-04-16
Third reading of the bill amending the Medicinal Products Act (hospital pharmacy) (532 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session

Specific opponents are neither named nor criticized. It is noted that the discussion in the Social Affairs Committee was substantive, although critical, which points to strong scrutiny but not a hostile attitude.
2025-04-15
The Ministry of Justice and Digital Transformation's 2025 presentation on the implementation of the state's long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035."

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.

The primary criticism is aimed at the policies of the government and the minister, particularly the amendments to the Employment Contracts Act, which are seen as undermining worker protections. The opposition is intense and rooted in policy, rejecting the practice of offloading business risks onto employees and vowing to fight against it. The minister's ideological approach to the Pihlakodu case is also being criticized.
2025-04-10
The Chancellor of Justice's proposal to align the Motor Vehicle Tax Act and the Road Traffic Act with the Basic Law.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

Not enough data.
2025-04-09
Second reading of the bill amending the Medicines Act (hospital pharmacy) (532 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session

The direct opposing party is not criticized, but concern is expressed regarding their procedural additions (such as ethics committee stages) which may increase bureaucracy. The criticism is aimed at the fact that these additional barriers prolong the process in a situation where there is insufficient competence for proper oversight, thereby impeding access to timely treatment.
2025-04-08
Draft law amending the Securities Market Act and, in consequence thereof, amending other laws (588 SE) - first reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The criticism is aimed primarily at societal gender biases and attitudes that prevent women from reaching leadership positions. It counters the views that deem the directive excessive bureaucracy or claim that Estonia lacks competent female expertise. It notes Finance Minister Jürgen Ligi's personal skepticism regarding overregulation but acknowledges that ignoring the directive would result in fines.
2025-03-26
Draft law amending the Constitution of the Republic of Estonia (536 SE) – Third Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The main criticism is directed against the initiators of the draft bill and the Riigikogu's handling of the procedure, accusing them of violating procedural rules and showing negligence. The criticism is both ethical and procedural, suggesting a hidden motivation aimed at reshaping the electorate and demonstrating a disregard for Estonia's internal peace. The addition of significant amendments immediately before the final vote is particularly deplored.