By Agendas: Mario Kadastik

Total Agendas: 61

Fully Profiled: 61

All Categories Political Position Topic Expertise Rhetorical Style Activity Patterns Opposition Stance Collaboration Style Regional Focus Economic Views Social Issues Legislative Focus
2025-10-15
First Reading of the Draft Act amending the Protection of Ambient Air Act and other Acts (Transposition of Amendments to the Renewable Energy Directive) (697 SE)

The 15th Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting

The rhetorical style is highly formal, neutral, and procedural, focusing on communicating the discussions and decisions of the Economic Affairs Committee. The speaker presents facts and summaries, referencing questions posed by other members (Aab, Maastik, Sutt) and the Ministry’s responses. Emotional appeals are not utilized; the emphasis is placed on conveying technical and procedural information.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-10-14
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Public Transport Act (725 SE)

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The rhetorical style is formal, neutral, and procedural, focusing on the factual conveyance of the commission’s work and discussion. The speaker employs logical arguments, referencing consensus and existing legislation (avoiding duplication of linguistic requirements). Emotional appeals are not used; the emphasis is placed on analysis and detail.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-10-09
Discussion of the Crucial National Issue 'The Future of the Estonian Economy'

15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

Insufficient information
View Profile View Agenda
2025-10-08
First reading of the Draft Decision of the Riigikogu (658 OE) "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic to Develop a Plan for Increasing Competition in the Mobile Communications Market and Accelerating Number Portability"

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The style is extremely formal, procedural, and informative, focusing on the neutral conveyance of the content and decisions made during the Economic Committee meetings. The tone is objective and analytical, emphasizing the presentation of facts and issues, rather than emotional appeals.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-24
Draft law amending the Motor Vehicle Insurance Act (649 SE) – First Reading

Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.

The rhetorical style is formal, analytical, and fact-based, fitting the role of a committee rapporteur. The tone is neutral and informative, focusing on logical arguments, such as EU directives and international risks, without emotional appeals. The speaker relies on the positions of the Ministry of Finance and the Motor Insurance Fund to support their claims.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-23
Draft Law Amending the Waste Act (676 SE) – First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 6th session, plenary session

The rhetorical style is interrogative, technical, and highly focused on specifics. The speaker employs legal-technical terminology and poses direct questions to highlight potential loopholes in the regulation or ambiguous application scenarios ("Does this present a point for further consideration?").
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-17
Draft law amending the Mandatory Traffic Insurance Act (Insurance of Light Electric Vehicle Users) – First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting.

The style is formal, analytical, and heavily grounded in facts, committee discussions, and statistics. The tone is critical of the draft bill's narrow scope, employing sharp metaphors such as "Band-Aid legislation" and hinting at a political ulterior motive. The speaker emphasizes logical argumentation and procedural correctness.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-11
Draft law amending the Holiday and Commemoration Day Act (636 SE) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session

The rhetorical style is formal, analytical, and interrogative, aiming to expose the logical contradictions and confusion present in the presenter's text. The speaker uses logical arguments based on economic realities, such as electricity consumption and labor input. The tone is critical and skeptical, referring to the presentation's claims as "a little strange."
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-04
Chair implementation

15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu

The rhetorical style is formal, objective, and explanatory, concentrating on detailing legislative steps and procedural specifics. The speaker employs appeals to logic to address concerns (such as the immediate construction of a nuclear power plant) and to justify the commission’s decisions. The tone is measured and procedure-focused.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-18
Draft law amending the Planning Act and other laws (accelerating the adoption of renewable energy) (541 SE) – third reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The style is corrective and self-assured, beginning with the refutation of counterarguments ("Again, in this sense, we must step in and overturn things a bit."). Logical arguments and concrete data are utilized to invalidate the opponents' claims, stressing the urgency of accelerating the process and reducing bureaucracy. The tone is analytical and formal.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-17
Draft law amending the Competition Act and, in consequence thereof, amending other laws (609 SE) – third reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session

The rhetorical style is urgent and pragmatic, employing the analogy of a long and expensive taxi ride as the central narrative device to illustrate the stalling of legislation and the associated costs. The appeal is primarily logical, focusing on financial damage ("the taxi meter is ticking") and rational decision-making.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-12
Continuation of the second reading of the bill (541 SE) amending the Planning Act and other laws (accelerating the adoption of renewable energy).

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The rhetorical style is rational, technical, and defensive, focusing on refuting counterarguments and clarifying facts ("I just wanted to refute some claims"). The speaker relies heavily on logical and economic arguments, explaining complex mechanisms (e.g., the effect of the subsidy on the average price) in a formal and matter-of-fact tone.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-10
Draft law amending the Competition Act and, in consequence, amending other laws (609 SE) - second reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.

The rhetorical style is formal, analytical, and centers on logical and procedural issues. The speaker poses a direct and critical question to the minister, highlighting the potential threat (non-compliance with the directive). Emotional appeals are absent; the focus is placed on identifying legal risks.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-05
Discussion of the significant national issue initiated by the Economics Committee: "How to increase productivity in the Estonian economy?"

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session.

The style is analytical and pragmatic, focusing on the government's action plan and specific measures. The tone is generally optimistic but acknowledges challenges (e.g., the high cost of capital, skills shortages); the rhetoric relies more on logical arguments and program details than on emotional appeals. Simplified metaphors are also employed to highlight the necessity of added value ("if all we do here is cut each other's hair").
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-21
Draft law amending the Liquid Fuels Act (622 SE) - First Reading

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.

The rhetorical style is highly confrontational, aggressive, and accusatory, focusing on exposing the opponent's (Urmas Reinsalu's) lack of credibility. Strong expressions are used ("lying with a straight face," "feeding people nonsense"), and systematic fact-checking is demanded in response to the opposition's "rubbish." Simultaneously, the accusations are backed up with specific data and logical comparisons.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-14
Draft law amending the Electricity Market Act (556 SE) – third reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session

The rhetorical style is corrective and occasionally combative, starting with correcting a colleague's bill number and refuting the projected length of the economic downturn. It employs logical and data-driven arguments to minimize the fears of opponents, for instance, by claiming that the impact of the socialized fee is negligible (i.e., "making a mountain out of a molehill"). The tone is confident and optimistic, stressing that the bill will introduce greater stability into the system.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-07
Second reading of the draft law amending the Electricity Market Act (556 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The rhetorical style is predominantly analytical and data-driven, but often becomes sharp and confrontational when engaging with opponents. It employs mathematical explanations and technical language, yet does not shy away from personal attacks and ridiculing opponents' arguments ("talking nonsense doesn't change reality"). It constantly seeks to correct opponents' factual errors and mathematical misunderstandings.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-07
Draft law amending the Planning Act and other laws (accelerating the adoption of renewable energy) (541 SE) - second reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The tone is argumentative, confident, and at times confrontational, particularly when dismantling opponents' claims. The speaker employs logical and technical appeals to clarify complex market regulations, while simultaneously accusing opponents of exaggeration ("mental inflation") and viewing the situation through an overly pessimistic lens. The overall style is detailed, focusing heavily on facts and regulatory frameworks.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-04-24
Debate on the nationally significant issue "The Drawbacks of Wind Power," initiated by the faction of the Estonian Conservative People's Party.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The rhetorical style is sharply analytical, critical, and at times combative, particularly concerning the quality of facts and experts presented by the opposing side. The arguments are predominantly logical and data-driven, seeking to scientifically refute specific claims (e.g., the effect of infrasound on health). Ultimately, the overall low quality and inadequate substance of the debate are criticized.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-04-23
Second reading of the draft law amending the Electricity Market Act (555 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The style is formal and detailed during the committee report phase, focusing specifically on procedural steps and the substance of the proposed amendments. In the ensuing debate, however, the tone shifts dramatically, becoming sharp, direct, and combative. This involves accusing the opposition (Urmas Reinsalu) of populism, "deliberate falsehoods," and aggressively extrapolating figures. The speaker heavily relies on logic and facts, attempting to disprove the high cost projections put forward by the opponents.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-04-16
Draft law amending the Energy Sector Organisation Act (574 SE) – First Reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session

The style is predominantly technical, logical, and explanatory, focusing on facts and market mechanisms to refute the opposing side's misconceptions (e.g., regarding the price of oil shale electricity or the freedom of the market). The tone is firm and well-reasoned, but not hostile, while simultaneously offering an opportunity for informal discussion.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-04-16
First reading of the draft resolution of the Riigikogu "Submission of a plan of action for the development of Estonia's electricity production capacities and electricity networks to the Riigikogu by the Government of the Republic, to ensure energy security" (575 OE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session

The rhetorical style is formal, analytical, and fact-based, relying heavily on technological and economic arguments. The tone is explanatory and persuasive, emphasizing objective reality while refuting alternative solutions based on their inefficiency. Instead of relying on emotional appeals, the text uses concrete figures and legal references to demonstrate the necessity and logical coherence of the government's action plan.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-04-15
Draft law amending the Public Transport Act (578 SE) - First Reading

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.

The rhetorical style is corrective, authoritative, and admonitory, centering on logical arguments and the clarification of the law. The speaker begins by criticizing the misinformation disseminated by others and recommends that the opposing parties consult the law itself, instead of relying on unreliable sources.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-04-09
The first reading of the draft resolution (569 OE) of the Riigikogu, "Proposal to the Government of the Republic to temporarily suspend the processing of all planning procedures related to wind farms, with a deferral until the establishment of an up-to-date methodology for infrasound measurements and the setting of limit values for sound pressure levels."

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session

The rhetorical style is highly analytical, logical, and data-driven, utilizing scientific facts and physical analogies (e.g., climbing stairs, a car with an open window) to refute arguments. The tone is authoritative and occasionally sharp, accusing opponents of inciting people based on ignorance. Instead of relying on emotional appeals, the focus is placed on scientific evidence and debunking myths (e.g., the "brown attack").
View Profile View Agenda
2025-03-24
Draft law amending the Electricity Market Act (568 SE) - First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session.

The speaker employs a predominantly analytical and data-driven style, focusing on technical explanations and factual correction. The tone is occasionally sharp and corrective, particularly when addressing questions and assertions from the audience (for instance, concerning the price of oil shale and the scope of subsidies), labeling certain claims as "a vile assertion" or "hot air." He utilizes logical appeals to substantiate the economic rationale of renewable energy compared to fossil fuels.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-03-11
The Prime Minister's address for 2025 on the implementation of the long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035" (including an overview of the situation of research and development activities and the government's policy in this area).

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The style is formal, analytical, and concerned, addressing the Prime Minister directly in the form of a question. Logical argumentation is employed, emphasizing the role of fundamental sciences as the foundation of the scientific pyramid. The tone is critical regarding the consequences of the government's policy (massive fragmentation), but remains respectful while requesting plans for solutions.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-01-29
The Chancellor of Justice's proposal to align the Electricity Market Act with the Constitution.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The rhetorical style is formal, neutral, and procedural, focusing on summarizing the facts and discussions within the Economic Commission. The speaker employs logical argumentation, referencing consultations held with the Office of the Chancellor of Justice and the European Commission, as well as the commission's unanimous decision.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-01-22
Draft law amending the Electricity Market Act (556 SE) – first reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session.

The rhetorical style is predominantly explanatory and analytical, focusing on elucidating complex technical and legislative details and resolving any resulting confusion. The tone is neutral and objective, relying on logical arguments, cost analysis, and summaries of commission discussions. The objective is to provide accurate information and answer questions.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-01-22
Draft law amending the Electricity Market Act (555 SE) - First Reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session.

The rhetorical style is formal, neutral, and procedural, characteristic of a commission rapporteur reporting on deliberations. The address focuses on objectively summarizing the discussions, questions raised, and consensus decisions of the Economic Committee. The appeals are strictly logical and fact-based, entirely avoiding emotional pleas.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-12-09
Draft law amending the Act on the Status of a Member of the Riigikogu (545 SE) - first reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting

The rhetorical style is inquisitive and analytical, focusing on logical evaluation and fact-checking. The speaker poses direct questions to challenge the bill's alleged financial benefits and its actual impact. The tone is formal and neutral.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-21
Draft law amending the Competition Law (466 SE) – Second Reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The rhetorical style is highly formal, neutral, and informative, focusing on the chronological reporting of procedural steps. Logical appeals are utilized, referencing specific dates, commission meetings, and consensus decisions, thereby avoiding emotional evaluations. The language itself is detailed and procedural.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-21
Second reading of the bill amending the Income Tax Act and the Defence Service Act, and the bill amending the Income Tax Act (509 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The rhetorical style is highly combative, corrective, and direct, intervening in the debate to correct the opposing side's alleged "nonsense." The speaker employs a fact-based approach, stressing data while simultaneously leveling serious accusations against the adversaries. Furthermore, he criticizes the abuse of procedural rules used to gain extended speaking time.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-10-14
Draft law amending the Competition Act (466 SE) - First Reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting

The style is highly formal, neutral, and procedural, focusing on conveying the content and decisions of the commission meetings. A logical structure is utilized, providing an overview of the discussions, voting results, and consensus decisions. Emotional appeals are absent; the emphasis is placed strictly on facts and the procedural course.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-09-18
Second reading of the Draft Act (359 SE) on amendments to the Law on the Organization of the Energy Economy, the Electricity Market Act, and the Environmental Impact Assessment and Environmental Management System Act

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session

The speaker's style is highly formal, procedural, and analytical, focusing on the detailed presentation of the Steering Committee's work and responding to questions. The tone is neutral and explanatory, emphasizing legal and technical aspects, and utilizing logical arguments (e.g., why waiting is not reasonable) and voting results.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-06-12
Second Reading of the Riigikogu Resolution "Supporting the Introduction of Nuclear Energy in Estonia" (431 OE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.

The rhetorical style is logical, fact-based, and authoritative, focusing on refuting counterarguments and clarifying procedural details. The speaker explicitly uses the phrase "just the facts" to emphasize the evidence-based nature of their arguments and avoid emotional appeals. The tone is concise and focused, aiming to correct inaccuracies that have arisen during the discussion.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-06-11
First reading of the Draft Act on Accession to the Convention establishing the European Organization for Nuclear Research, the associated Financial Protocol, and the Protocol on Privileges and Immunities (451 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.

The rhetorical style is formal, logical, and persuasive, relying primarily on economic and technological arguments. The tone is optimistic regarding future opportunities but also includes an urgent appeal to finalize ratification quickly before CERN’s 70th anniversary. The speaker utilizes a personal historical connection to the subject matter to establish credibility.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-06-06
Second Reading of the Draft Act on the Amendment of the Motor Insurance Act and Related Amendments to Other Acts (Bill 400 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The rhetorical style is formal, substantive, and procedural, focusing on reporting the work of the Steering Committee to the Riigikogu. The address is objective and neutral, avoiding emotional appeals, and relying on facts, deadlines, and consensual procedural decisions. The presentation is structured, strictly following the stages of the bill's proceedings.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-06-06
Draft Act on Amendments to the Road Traffic Act and the Police and Border Guard Act (429 SE), second reading

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The rhetorical style is formal, neutral, and strictly procedural, which is appropriate for the role of a committee rapporteur. The speaker relies on logical appeals, presenting factual data (such as dates and the number of amendments) without any emotional charge.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-06-06
Second Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Act on Organizing the Energy Sector and Other Acts (356 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The rhetorical style is formal, neutral, and strictly descriptive, focusing on the conveyance of procedural facts and dates. Emotional or logical appeals are absent; the speech is rather a report on the committee's work. The language used is matter-of-fact and focuses on procedural accuracy.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-06-03
First Reading of the Draft Resolution (409 OE) of the Riigikogu "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic to Implement Effective Measures to Protect Minors from Exposure to Pornography"

Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary sitting.

The rhetorical style is skeptical and aggressive, employing strong and emotionally charged comparisons (such as China’s totalitarian regime) to discredit the opposing side’s proposal. The argumentation itself is logical, but the tone remains resolute, stressing the irrationality of the measures and the threat they pose to fundamental freedoms.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-30
Discussion of the nationally important issue: "How can the state avoid living in debt?"

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting

The rhetorical style is analytical, inquisitive, and extremely fact-based. The tone is formal and focuses on logical questions aimed at obtaining clarification regarding the details of the presentation given. Emotional or personal appeals are absent; the emphasis is on technical clarity.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-29
First reading of the Riigikogu Draft Resolution "Supporting the Introduction of Nuclear Energy in Estonia" (431 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The speaker’s rhetorical style is predominantly analytical, detailed, and logic-focused, as they patiently and thoroughly answered numerous questions. The tone is calm and convincing, emphasizing that the current decision is only the first step and that the details (locations, funding) will follow later. Explanatory analogies (e.g., the chicken and the egg, marriages) are used to simplify complex procedural points.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-16
Debate on the matter of national importance initiated by the Economic Affairs Committee: "How to increase productivity in the Estonian economy?"

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session

The rhetorical style is analytical and substantive, emphasizing the need for rapid structural changes in the economy. The appeals are primarily logical and fact-based, utilizing detailed examples concerning intellectual property restrictions and the "stamp of approval" for CERN procurements. The overall tone is expert, positive, and appreciative of the presenters.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-15
Bill to Amend the Traffic Act and the Police and Border Guard Act (429 SE), First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The rhetorical style is formal, objective, and highly procedural, focusing on the factual reporting of events that took place during the Economic Committee's sessions. The speaker employs a logical approach, describing the substance of the discussions and consensus decisions without emotional appeals. The language used is neutral and report-oriented.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-15
Second reading of the Draft Act amending the Building Code and other Acts (Acceleration of the Deployment of Renewable Energy) (308 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The speech is formal, detailed, and procedural, characteristic of a report presented by the rapporteur of the lead committee. The style is neutral and logical, focusing on the precise listing of facts, deadlines, and voting results. The speaker uses technical language (e.g., "phantom mergers," "regarding the integrated permit") and defends the committee's decisions on procedural grounds.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-15
The 2024 Report by the Minister of Climate on the Implementation of the State's Long-Term Development Strategy "Estonia 2035"

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The style is formal and polite, directly addressing the presiding officer and the minister. The speaker presents their viewpoint as a question, focusing on a logical and detailed political proposal that they term an "interesting concept."
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-09
Debate on the matter of significant national importance: "E-elections – a threat to democracy."

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The rhetorical style is predominantly analytical and logical, relying on technical explanations and system comparisons. The tone is formal, yet also slightly aggressive, accusing opponents of political bias and a failure to understand technology. He criticizes the debate as a "political ball game" and regrets the absence of technical experts (RIA, VVK) from the discussion, which diminished its relevance.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-08
First reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Motor Third Party Liability Insurance Act and Consequential Amendments to Other Acts (400 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session.

The rhetorical style is formal, neutral, and informative, characteristic of a committee rapporteur. The speaker employs a logical approach, focusing on summarizing the discussions of the Economic Committee and communicating procedural decisions (reached by consensus). Emotional appeals are absent; the emphasis is placed on factual and detailed reporting.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-07
Third Reading of the Draft Act on the Amendment of the Riigikogu Election Act and the Amendment of Other Related Acts (Bill 344 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The rhetorical style is rational, fact-based, and authoritative, focusing on refuting criticism using specific facts and data (e.g., 19 years of implementation, zero incidents). The discourse is formal and logical, drawing comparisons to the security of banking systems to underscore the auditability of e-elections. The objective is to establish legal clarity and dispel rumors.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-04-18
Discussion of the matter of significant national importance, initiated by the Environmental Committee, titled "The necessity and possibilities of introducing nuclear energy in Estonia"

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The rhetorical style is analytical, logical, and convincingly optimistic, emphasizing the need to avoid previous indecisiveness. Emphasis is placed on fact-based debate, and attempts are made to dispel common fears (waste, cost, market entry) using statistical comparisons and long-term timelines. The tone is formal and suitable for conducting a substantive plenary debate.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-04-17
Second Reading of the Draft Act (344 SE) on the Amendment of the Riigikogu Election Act and Related Amendment of Other Acts

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The rhetorical style is explanatory, rational, and authoritative, with the goal of correcting technical misconceptions. The speaker uses formal and technical language, relying on logical arguments and technical details. He advises skeptics to review the RIA visualizations and consult experts, showing slight frustration that incorrect opinions continue to persist.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-04-10
First Reading of the Draft Act on the Amendment of the Competition Act and the Amendment of Other Associated Acts (384 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session

The style of discourse is extremely formal, informative, and procedural, focusing on the summary of the Economic Committee meeting and the communication of decisions. The tone is neutral and analytical, relying on facts, voting results, and the responses of officials, while avoiding emotional appeals.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-04-10
Second Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Precious Metal Products Act, the State Fee Act, and the Equipment Safety Act (Bill 363 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session

The style of discourse is formal, neutral, and strictly informative, focusing on the conveyance of facts and the course of procedure. Logical appeals and precise procedural terminology are utilized, and emotional or rhetorical elements are absent.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-04-10
Second reading of the Draft Act amending the Electricity Market Act and other acts (Termination of universal service and ensuring security of supply) (Bill 351 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session

The rhetorical style is extremely formal, procedural, and fact-based. The speaker focuses exclusively on the objective reporting of the work and decisions of the Economic Committee, presenting a chronological overview and the voting results. The tone is neutral, and the purpose is to convey information about the legislative process.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-04-03
Second Reading of the Bill on the Amendment of the Electronic Communications Act and the Nature Conservation Act (392 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The rhetorical style is clarifying, analytical, and procedural, emphasizing that the intervention is being carried out "in the interest of protocol." The discourse is logical and focuses on correcting technical facts to resolve the legal conflict, while strictly avoiding emotional appeals.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-03-07
Debate on the matter of national importance, "The Future of Estonian Energy 2035," initiated by the Estonian Reform Party parliamentary group.

Fifteenth Riigikogu, third sitting, plenary session

The rhetorical style is constructive, analytical, and substantive, focusing on political vision and long-term planning. The tone is somewhat urgent, stressing the immediate need to decide which technologies to research in order to avoid the indecision seen up until now. Logical arguments and references to strategic documents are employed, balanced by a brief emotional appeal concerning a clean environment (Narva pollution).
View Profile View Agenda
2024-03-06
First reading of the Bill (359 SE) for the Act supplementing the Act on the Organization of the Energy Sector and the Act on Environmental Impact Assessment and Environmental Management System

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The rhetorical style is highly analytical, informative, and procedural, focusing on the neutral conveyance of the committee’s work and the substance of the draft legislation. Logical arguments and technical explanations are employed, for instance, when specifying the conditions for waiving the EIA (Environmental Impact Assessment) requirement, in order to avoid duplication of effort. The tone is formal and objective, avoiding emotional appeals.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-03-05
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Organization of the Energy Sector Act and Other Acts (Bill 356 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The style is predominantly explanatory, fact-based, and formal, focusing on summarizing the commission's discussion and answering questions. On the topic of the climate crisis, the tone is rather urgent, but when presenting political solutions, it remains logical and measured, relying on scientific and market information. The speaker frequently uses procedural limitations and disclaimers ("we did not discuss this in the commission") to distinguish the commission's presentation from personal speculation.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-03-05
2024 Report by the Minister of Education and Research on the Implementation of the State's Long-Term Development Strategy "Eesti 2035" (Education Reforms)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The style is formal and interrogative, addressing the chair and the minister directly. The tone is policy-centric and logical, employing arguments regarding the changing global landscape and the necessity of supporting new methodologies, while posing specific policy questions.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-02-14
First reading of the Draft Act amending the Electricity Market Act and other acts (termination of universal service and ensuring security of supply) (Bill 351 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The speech is formal, neutral, and procedural, characterizing the role of the commission's rapporteur. The style is data-driven, listing the questions submitted, the answers received, and the commission's consensus decisions, while avoiding emotional or personal appeals.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-23
Overview of the state of Research and Development and government policy in this field.

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The rhetorical style is formal and deferential, addressing the Prime Minister with words of thanks and employing polite forms of address ("Honorable Chair! Esteemed Prime Minister"). The speech is analytical and focuses on logical, structural solutions, presenting its viewpoint in the form of a constructive question.
View Profile View Agenda
Back to Profiling