By Months: Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart
Total Months: 9
Fully Profiled: 9
11.2025
18 Speeches
The confrontation is aimed at the ruling coalition (Reform Party, Estonia 200, Social Democrats), which is criticized for consistently voting down the Center Party’s draft legislation. The most intense criticism concerns the alleged corrupt link between generous donations from Bolt’s founding members and the exemption from mandatory traffic insurance. The accuser charges the coalition with protecting the interests of specific entrepreneurs at the expense of people’s health.
10.2025
40 Speeches
The main opponents are the governing coalition (the Reform Party, Estonia 200, the Social Democrats) and specifically Prime Minister Kristen Michal and Minister of Social Affairs Karmen Joller. The criticism is both policy-based (tax hikes, cuts to family benefits) and procedural/personal (Michal’s "spontaneous juggling of taxes," and Joller’s refusal to meet with the Chamber of Disabled People). Compromise is ruled out, with a promise to fight for the complete abolition of the tax.
09.2025
94 Speeches
Critical and strongly oppositional: he attacks the coalition's tax policy and overall economic policy, accusing them of hypocrisy and an inability to stand up to the interests of powerful people. He predicts that the coalition will disappoint regarding taxes and will be unable to offer stable and fairer policies.
06.2025
68 Speeches
The focus of the criticism is the government's tax policy and the reality of promises made: accusing parties and the coalition of lying and calling tax increases a "tax festival," attempting to demonstrate a loss of public trust. At the same time, he is willing to cooperate and shows that compromises are necessary in certain issues, but often he finds rebuttals and oversteps boundaries when constitutional or fundamental rights risks are seen.
05.2025
46 Speeches
Effective opposition to government policy: criticism regarding tax policy, inflation and price increases, and the financial situation of pensioners; attacks the Reform Party, Estonia 200, and social democrats for taking responsibility for their decisions. Intense tone, accusations of corruption and the role of coalition partners; the search for compromise does not appear as openly as planned, through transparency-enhancing special committees and public hearings.
04.2025
32 Speeches
Critical of coalition agreements: attacks the Reform Party and [unclear party name] and the government's tax changes; emphasizes that the policies have harmful effects, but at the same time, its own coalition members are also criticized and a willingness to oppose opponents' proposals is demonstrated; strong, absolute opposition when it comes to resolving issues related to the coalition’s tax increases and corruption.
03.2025
19 Speeches
Critical of the government and coalition; accuses the Reform Party and the Social Democrats’ coalition of flawed tax strategies, conflicts of interest, and a lack of transparency. He positions the Social Democrats’ coalition and their policies (e.g., vehicle tax, state aid analysis, etc.) as adversaries, emphasizing that these are in conflict with the constitution or insufficiently transparent. Intense and aesthetic rhetoric is directed at the opponents, and there's a need for clarity and accountability regarding government decisions.
02.2025
34 Speeches
The primary opponent of coalition politics, focusing on criticism of tax policy and energy policy. Attacks are directed at the coalition and the parties (Reform Party, Estonia 200, EKRE, Centre Party) and their transparency and democratic processes. It reasserts the protection of strict moral and rule of law foundations and does not soften political opposition.
01.2025
39 Speeches
A strong opposition to the coalition; criticism centers on the government's decisions and processes (e.g., Tallinn Hospital funding, support for non-profit organizations, state security policy), and is directed against the Reform Party and other governing parties. It's characterized by sharp evaluations and personalized accusations, but at the same time, a willingness to cooperate under certain conditions (compromises and proposed changes) is emphasized.