By Plenary Sessions: Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart

The main opponents are the Reform Party and the Eesti 200 government, who are accused of lacking a strategic economic plan and prioritizing banks and casino businessmen over the general public. The criticism is intense, labeling the government's actions a "cynical election campaign" and warning of future tax hikes. The government's activities are described as boosting their ratings before the elections "with empty promises and borrowed money."

Criticism is directed at the Electoral Commission and the Electoral Service for the administrative chaos and inconsistent decisions they have caused. Legislation is also being criticized because, despite the long-term use of e-voting, it has failed to provide for the inclusion of independent auditors. The criticism is procedural and policy-based, not personal.

The main opponent is the Reform Party government led by Kristen Michal, as well as Eesti 200 and the Social Democrats, who are accused of adopting the "cluster bill disaster" (kobarkäkk). The criticism is intense, covering political failures (missed forecasts, failure to collect the registration fee) and ethical shortcomings (the attitude towards people with disabilities, the prime minister's conduct). Separately, Eesti 200's initiatives concerning tax breaks for prisons and casino companies are being criticized.

The primary targets are the Minister of Social Affairs and the leadership of the Health Insurance Fund, who are criticized for procedural irregularities, the opacity of decision-making processes, and the squandering of funds. The criticism is intense and includes accusations of unethical behavior and media leaks. Furthermore, the Reform Party’s general approach to livelihood and welfare issues is also being indirectly scrutinized.

The speaker is in strong opposition to the current coalition (the Reform Party and Estonia 200), accusing them of consistently voting down essential legislation. The criticism targets political corruption, alleging that coalition politicians prioritize the interests of a specific company (Bolt) due to having received generous donations from them. The oppositional tone is intense and uncompromising, focusing on political accountability and inaction.