By Plenary Sessions: Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart

The speaker opposes tax hikes (income tax, VAT on food) and sharply criticizes the use of borrowed money to cover current expenditures, deeming it unsustainable. He demands support for domestic food production and criticizes the government's preferential treatment of banks (lower advance income tax) and casino operators (lowering the gambling tax). The abolition of the tax hump is considered a gift to higher-income earners.

There is too little data.

The economic stance is firmly opposed to new taxes (such as the car tax and the registration fee), arguing that they are unjust, burden citizens simultaneously with existing taxes (fuel excise duty, VAT), and are costly to administer. Emphasis is placed on concerns regarding family incomes, and the government's failed budget implementation plans are criticized. The issue of creating a tax haven for casino companies is also being raised.

Economic perspectives stress strict fiscal discipline and the purposeful use of public funds, strongly opposing the expenditure of money on administrative luxuries (consulting, parties, travel) at the expense of essential services. The Health Insurance Fund’s significant spending on business and management consulting is being criticized.

The speaker supports social redistribution through pension top-ups, viewing this as a stimulus for economic growth that boosts purchasing power and generates additional tax revenue for the state budget. At the same time, the speaker is critical of invoking the argument of entrepreneurial freedom (freedom of enterprise) when it impedes the protection of public health, and calls for stricter regulation for rental service providers.