By Plenary Sessions: Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart
Total Sessions: 163
Fully Profiled: 163
2025-10-16
XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
Economic perspectives are heavily focused on reducing taxes, particularly the value-added tax (VAT), in order to ease the burden on consumers. The government's policy of raising taxes is viewed as unreasonable, as it was implemented without any prior analysis of the impact on consumers.
2025-10-08
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
They strongly oppose the squandering of taxpayer money in state institutions, demanding that the expenditures of the Health Insurance Fund (advertising, consulting, and parties) be brought under control. They criticize tax policies that place the burden on vulnerable groups (such as the car tax for disabled individuals), accusing the state of profiting at the expense of the weakest members of society. They advocate for fiscal discipline and oppose the continuous upward trend in administrative and governance costs.
2025-10-08
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Information Hour
Supports stricter regulation of business, demanding mandatory traffic insurance and in-app age verification from rental companies (e.g., Bolt). It is critical of the current situation where freedom of enterprise outweighs the protection of public health.
2025-10-07
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
Economic outlooks highlight the issue of declining consumer purchasing power and low confidence, which is dampening consumption. It is noted that the growth in net wages is significantly lagging behind price increases, which is the primary cause of the drop in consumption. There is a demand for improved fiscal discipline and budget transparency, criticizing the practice of leaving funds unused under the guise of closing services.
2025-10-06
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
Economic views are strongly opposed to tax increases. Specific criticism is aimed at the car tax and the hike in VAT to 24%, which has driven up the cost of food and services. The government is being accused of worsening the financial situation of families and essentially robbing them through what is termed "quadruple taxation." Support is voiced for abolishing these taxes and implementing compensation mechanisms to ease social pressure.
2025-09-24
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
The text emphasizes the significance of taxpayer money and the need for rigorous cost tracking. It cites 70 million euros allocated for the train procurement and roughly 30 million annually for maintenance, underscoring the necessity for associated risk and benefit analyses. It further highlights that these expenditures must be justified and transparent.
2025-09-22
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
Economically, he is critical of unequal regulation that could favor a single company and increase the burden on the taxpayer, and he stresses the necessity of a level playing field in the market. He prioritizes consumer protection and reducing the costs borne by the end-user in the market.
2025-09-17
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting.
The economic focus centers on criticizing the bill's cost and the risks associated with the government budget. Specific mention is made of 3.5 million euros from the European Union Recovery Fund, alongside a discussion of sustained long-term cost increases and the resulting impact on taxpayers. He/She emphasizes the need to reduce costs related to consumer protection and the Health Insurance Fund, but does not support proposals that would incur additional expenditures or grant advantages favoring a single business entity.
2025-09-17
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, press briefing.
Stresses the importance of the effective use of taxpayer money and strict control over expenditures. It is critical of large expenditures and incentive packages, emphasizing the necessity for comprehensive evaluation and transparency, along with potential cost reductions and financial accountability at the state level.
2025-09-16
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
Not enough data
2025-09-15
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting
Critical of central government tax policies: It is emphasized that local authorities lack additional funding while their obligations increase, which could lead to a multi-fold increase in land tax and the deterioration of people's living conditions. This is accompanied by criticism regarding car taxes and mobility costs, and it is stressed that the growth in post-care expenses and deficiencies in road budget allocation reduce economic well-being. The stance supports strong local financial management and resistance to central government fiscal pressure.
2025-09-11
15th Riigikogu, 6th plenary sitting
The stance is aimed at protecting the integrity of financial markets and corporate governance; it emphasizes the importance of preventing risks and potential criminal proceeds. There are no separate details regarding macro-financial assistance or reconstruction.
2025-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
Critical of the size of government and public sector expenditures; stresses the need for evaluating the use of funds based on tax administration and thorough impact analyses. It supports cost savings and efficiency gains, while simultaneously drawing attention to deficiencies in wage fund growth and the selection of office spaces. It calls for strengthening fiscal responsibility and transparency.
2025-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, press briefing
Criticism regarding tax policy and the sustainability of tax changes: It is emphasized that decisions concerning sudden tax increases, including income tax, corporate income tax, car tax, or VAT, must be made while considering the impact on vulnerable groups (children, people with disabilities, pensioners, and rural populations). The text expresses an expectation for transparency and a consistent budget, stressing that tax changes can impose an indirect burden on taxpayers. Expenditures (such as summer office retreats, training, and salary costs) are cited as examples of areas requiring budgetary oversight and potential cost reductions.
2025-09-08
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
Not enough data
2025-09-04
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
A critical stance on economic and tax policy: the opposition to the car tax and the sugar tax, an opposition rooted in the interplay between budgetary costs and EU legislation; the demand for budget transparency, separate accounting for expenditures, and mandatory impact assessments. Recommendations concerning support for the economic plan are currently being disregarded, with emphasis instead placed on providing specific support measures (such as school lunches and school sports), all while ensuring meticulous expenditure management and transparent business relations.
2025-06-19
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The critical and evaluative topic of discussion concerns the funding and economic background: it emphasizes that the “3.5 million euros” in European Union funds must not justify the violation of fundamental human rights; it criticizes the fact that the economic pretext (money originating from the EU) does not justify the implementation of widely interconnected data collection systems. Skepticism is expressed regarding the correlation between large-scale expenditure and security measures.
2025-06-18
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Economic issues primarily come to the fore in the context of taxation and legality. Regarding the car tax, emphasis is placed on its unconstitutionality and the opposition it faces, while economic measures themselves are not widely explored; the need to adhere to the constitution and the assessments provided by the Chancellor of Justice in the field of taxation is stressed.
2025-06-17
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
Reportedly, cost issues related to the bill's funding and taxpayer money are raised, and the question is asked how much money will be spent on the entire upkeep; a specific economic policy stance is not expressed, but budgetary impacts and transparency are addressed.
2025-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The central focus of the discussion is the concern regarding the adequacy of the tax increases and their subsequent effects. Criticism is directed at the permanent rise in VAT and income tax, which impacts middle and lower-income families, and the government is accused of misleading the public. The speaker emphasizes inflation and rising prices, arguing that the tax calculator and the changes provide only modest financial gains—a small benefit that affects everyone—which are negligible compared to the large overall benefit (or burden). The overall tone is critical and fundamentally dismissive, stressing the magnitude of the burden placed on consumers.
2025-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing.
To stimulate the economy, the need to increase infrastructure funding is recognized. It is emphasized that broader investments are necessary to improve safety and accessibility, and that delayed or limited funding will result in higher future costs. The position is growth-based and focused on financing.
2025-06-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.
There is not enough data regarding the economy, taxes, or regulations.
2025-06-09
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
A focus on consolidating family benefits and social measures: It advocates for free kindergartens as an investment in family well-being and promoting the birth rate. It opposes the introduction or retention of a car tax or other unnecessary taxes, and wants the state to intervene in the housing market to increase the availability of suitable housing for young people. Overall, it favors moderate but targeted public spending aimed at improving the living standards of families and young people.
2025-06-04
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
There is ongoing criticism concerning the Climate Ministry's stance, which raises the specter of restricting entrepreneurial freedom. It is stressed that the draft legislation does not ban business outright but rather seeks to strike a balance between public health and enterprise. It is recognized that the regulation could reduce visual pollution in the urban landscape and foster better conditions, although attention is also paid to how companies' marketing activities (e.g., Bolt) influence the network and the market.
2025-06-04
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing
The position is oppositional regarding tax reduction and the maintenance of a fairer distribution of the tax burden. It highlights the cliff effect for low-income individuals and the necessity of regulating tax distribution; it opposes the permanent continuation of major tax changes, specifically criticizing the breaking of promises and promoting the restoration of public trust.
2025-06-03
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fifth session, plenary session
Economically, the focus is on financial stability and the effect of fees, as well as the negative consequences of ending targeted financing and demanding dividends. This requires a review of the dividend policy and the airport's financial structure to ensure proper market functioning.
2025-06-02
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session
Not enough data
2025-05-21
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing.
It emphasizes the increase in the tax burden (33% vs 36%) and pressure from the IMF; the focus is on the negative economic impact on families and the unfavorable distribution. It highlights that the car tax is inconsistent with reasonable economic and social objectives and requires reconsideration or abolition.
2025-05-20
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The subject is critical and conservative regarding tax policy, aiming to avoid permanent tax burdens. The emphasis is placed on people's ability to cope and the nation's economic stability. It argues that making tax hikes permanent damages citizens' standard of living and questions how such measures would strengthen the state and security.
2025-05-19
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
Economically, [it] supports reducing bureaucracy and improving competitiveness; [it is] critical of the impact of green policies on small businesses; and prefers approaches that balance regulatory requirements with economic activity.
2025-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
It does not express a direct stance regarding economic impacts; it focuses on figures, transparency, and the presentation of accurate data, which may influence economic decision-making. It neither advertises nor professionally defends economic activity as a separate matter.
2025-05-14
15th Riigikogu, fifth sitting, information briefing.
The economic approach is centered on emphasizing fiscal discipline and transparency in investments: it criticizes tax hikes and permanent tax liabilities, while simultaneously demonstrating that major infrastructure funding cannot be realized without a secure and clearly justified financing model. The stance remains skeptical toward increased spending, underscoring the necessity of controlling risks and anticipated liabilities.
2025-05-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The link to the green transition and green subsidies, and the highlighting of their associated corruption risk; the focus is on the transparency of costs and investments and the priorities for fund allocation, but direct details concerning taxes or broader economic measures are absent.
2025-05-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.
Critical and focused on economic well-being: it argues that the tax policy is detrimental, emphasizes that security is dependent on the ability to maintain one's livelihood, and is therefore opposed to "permanent" tax hikes. However, it also acknowledges the attempts made so far to implement tax changes and points out that these are not working, necessitating reform or amendments to the legislation. It relies on a forceful narrative asserting that support for citizens' income and consumption is critically important, and criticizes the government, which, according to the speaker, has lied about tax issues.
2025-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Insufficient data.
2025-05-07
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The economic policy discussion has been dominated by criticism regarding the impact of tax hikes and a demand for either a rollback or modification of these taxes. Emphasis is placed on rising prices, inflation, business hardship, the bankruptcy of logistics companies, and the economic insecurity faced by young families. Criticism of the coalition's tax policy and support for market and entrepreneurial interests are at the forefront.
2025-05-07
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing
Economic policy stresses the protection of pensioners' livelihoods amidst inflation; tax hikes (the car tax, the security tax) are criticized for their negative impact on pensioners and the population at large; public spending is condemned, particularly funds that are suspiciously allocated to specific businesses (e.g., 2.6 billion). It is highlighted that the Social Democrats have not yet demonstrated better results compared to the alternatives put forward by the Reform Party/Eesti 200.
2025-05-06
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The economic policy stance has not been clearly defined; the possibility of wage increases is mentioned to maintain the quality of public services, but it is stressed that this must not be used as a tool to secure political loyalty. There is no detailed plan, nor is there any general significant support for or opposition to the economic policy; the emphasis is institutional and grounded in democratic principles, rather than being driven by economic objectives.
2025-05-05
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
On the subject of economic policy, the speaker is critical of the government's tax and price increases, arguing that raising taxes fuels inflation and diminishes people's purchasing power. He stresses the importance of sustaining entrepreneurship during times of crisis and calls for investment in IT to ensure the pensioner payment system functions more effectively. Furthermore, he highlights the necessity of funding social and regional policy initiatives, rather than expanding bureaucratic punitive mechanisms.
2025-04-23
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The focus on procedural economy indicates a preference for procedures that save time and resources; it does not represent any specific broader economic or tax policy.
2025-04-23
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing
The central economic debate revolves around mitigating consumer prices and optimizing the tax system. There is support for targeted subsidies (specifically to local producers rather than across all goods) and criticism regarding a general increase in VAT. Emphasis is placed on the effect of inflation and the cost of living on families, alongside the necessity of boosting economic growth and competitiveness. The consensus is to avoid sweeping tax reforms, favoring instead targeted support measures.
2025-04-21
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Not enough data.
2025-04-17
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The economic agenda focuses on achieving balance in the implementation of the tax system: opposing tax increases or implementing narrowly targeted special conditions (e.g., lowering VAT on groceries, support for local businesses), and improving the transparency of tax allocations. COVID subsidies have been praised as targeted and necessary, but the overall issue of budget transparency has been highlighted.
2025-04-15
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
It supports regulation and consumer protection (e.g., requiring traffic insurance for scooters) and highlights the need to establish and ensure additional social guarantees for the ride-sharing workforce. At the same time, it criticizes the lobbying efforts of certain interest groups that contradict social or market principles. It does not directly address detailed positions on taxation or the general large financial structure.
2025-04-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Addressing economic policy, the speaker opposes making tax increases permanent, stressing that the sustained rise in VAT and income tax damages residents' financial well-being and undermines business competitiveness. He emphasizes the necessity of budget transparency and points to potential changes, including the ongoing debate regarding the treatment of corporate profit tax and income tax. Furthermore, he argues that taxation negatively affects family finances and the overall economic climate.
2025-04-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The economic perspective focuses on the legitimacy of the tax policy and the available legal protection mechanisms; tax exemptions are supported for vulnerable groups (people with disabilities, large families) as specific exceptions within the context of the car tax. The car tax is evaluated as a potential detriment to family budgets and social welfare, rather than a source of broad-based tax funding, and legal and ethical considerations are stressed as being of greater importance than short-term economic impact.
2025-04-09
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
Regarding the economy and taxation, the speaker holds a limited positive economic outlook. He is highly critical of the overall tax burden (VAT, fuel excise duty, car tax), arguing that these measures increase the cost of living and place a heavy strain on families. He stresses the need for the redistribution of tax services and the equalization of burdens, proposing to abolish the car tax and potentially offer compensation, specifically acknowledging the needs of rural areas. A firm preference is stated: tax relief should be based on social needs, not on generating a broad surplus.
2025-04-09
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing
Economically, the criticism centers on the costs associated with state interventionism and the impact of tax policy on taxpayers. It highlights that state expenditures and potential over-procurement entail a fixed cost (approximately 68 million euros), and stresses the crucial importance of transparency and oversight. Furthermore, skepticism remains regarding taxation and the lack of clarity in tax-related decision-making.
2025-04-08
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Insufficient data; specific views on the economic or employment impact are not presented.
2025-03-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
There are no references to economic topics (taxes, spending, wealth, etc.).
2025-03-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing
Economically, emphasis has been placed on the detrimental nature of the tax policy and its impact on families and the overall cost of living. The first speech highlighted concerns regarding grocery prices and tax increases, demanding clarification and potential postponement. The second speech centered its criticism on the car tax, specifically addressing the burden placed on people with special needs and large families, and is tied to ongoing discussions about scrapping the proposed tax schemes. The overall objective is to limit taxation and protect vulnerable groups.
2025-03-19
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing.
Criticism regarding the use of large subsidy allocations, particularly for newly established companies and for applications exceeding the 13 million limit; emphasis is placed on transparency, protecting fairness, and the proper distribution of state funds. This demonstrates a desire to avoid corruption and monopolies, but fails to offer specific alternative economic policy solutions.
2025-03-17
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Criticism of the multi-package tax structures: the increase in VAT and fuel excise duty, the rise in registration fees and fines, and the gradual impact of the car tax on the cost of living. In contrast, pre-tax savings measures are presented, alongside the argument that road construction investments are decreasing. There is a demand for the review and abolition of the car tax, and the use of compensation mechanisms for specific listed groups. The primary objective is to reduce the financial burden and ensure a level playing field for society's most vulnerable groups.
2025-03-12
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session
Economic policy positions are not directly emphasized; rather, the focus is placed on public sector transparency and the supervision of contracts as a component of economic activity. The economic policy discourse remains primarily in the background in this speech, serving the discussion of mutual control and accountability.
2025-03-12
The 15th Riigikogu, fifth sitting, information briefing.
The guiding principles of the economy focus on the economic, yet cautious, utilization of natural resources; emphasizing that resources must be used reasonably and transparently for the benefit of the economy. He/She is critical of changes to state aid and competition requirements, and stresses the need to avoid excessive regulation that could stifle business operations. He/She emphasizes that severe punitive measures should be avoided, and that legality and established processes must be followed.
2025-03-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The economic focus is reflected in the protection of the state budget and taxpayer funds; criticism regarding state intervention or the granting of loans (the Nordica bailout) and unfair/expected contracts that caused losses to the taxpayer. It points out that the loan and consulting agreements were concentrated in unstable ventures, and emphasizes the need for transparency and accountability concerning state financing, rather than focusing on expansion or additional costs. There is a clearly negative attitude towards the government’s intentions to use public money for bailouts if such actions are not transparently and legally controlled.
2025-02-27
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The economic positions center on safeguarding consumer prices and minimizing the taxpayer burden; this includes criticism of the coalition's decisions that disproportionately burden taxpayers, and an emphasis on the transparency of mandated energy costs. It has been argued that the costs of the green transition and ensuring supply security must be integrated into the state budget, and that affordable electricity for consumers must be the priority.
2025-02-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, press briefing
The objective is to protect consumer prices and access. [There is] criticism regarding the taxation of dividends of state-owned enterprises and the allocation of investments, which, according to him/her, is closely linked to price growth. [The speaker] advocates for maintaining competition to ensure cheaper air travel and stresses the importance of balancing investments and financing. [The speaker] acknowledges the necessity of the green transition and adherence to CO2 standards, but not the abandonment of consumer price increases under clearly defined maximum conditions.
2025-02-25
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Not enough data
2025-02-19
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary sitting
Not enough data
2025-02-19
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th sitting, information briefing
It highlights the need for awareness regarding state budget risks and the specific nature of state aid authorizations. Emphasis is placed on the integrity of the calculations currently being prepared, and the possibility that a rapid decision-making process could prove costly in the future. It necessitates deliberate, transparent, and verifiable planning, along with a review of pricing policies.
2025-02-18
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The focus of economic policy centers on criticizing the tax burden placed on banks and the need for balanced taxation. It highlights the injustice inherent in favoring banks and notes that political parties and the government, in their roles, may be inclined toward "throwing money away" style strategies. It demonstrates a desire to avoid unequal treatment in economic policy, advocating for clearer, more uniform taxation, and links this approach to achieving broader growth potential. It points out that the real priority should be investing funds effectively, rather than funding the privileges of favorable sectors.
2025-02-17
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
Emphasis is placed on the need to finance transport (additional funding and investments), alongside criticism regarding the failure to channel revenue generated by the car tax into transport. Greater investment and resource sharing are preferred in order to improve the network and utilize quick-impact solutions.
2025-02-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The economic viewpoint is critical of the government's economic policy: emphasis is placed on public welfare and the savings environment, a distinction is drawn between the wealthy and the average family, and the issues of savings and consumer loans are raised as important indicators. He/She stresses that savings have grown among the rich, and that the general situation for families hasn't improved, has it? He/She further stresses the need to focus on the interests of average families; the focus is primarily on equality and economic growth for the benefit of the people overall.
2025-02-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing
The necessary steps for economic stimulus are not concretely defined; the statement highlights the financial burden on families and the impact of inflation, serving as a criticism of tax increases; it calls for three specific measures but fails to present a detailed economic policy.
2025-02-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
No data available.
2025-02-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The economic policy mix: It opposes the current tax policy (income tax, VAT) and emphasizes shrinking incomes and rising consumer costs. It also advocates for taxing banks' excess profits to ease the burden on ordinary people; it believes there is a lack of trust regarding the continuation of temporary tax hikes and wants economic growth to be driven by systematized tax increases and new economic sectors (e.g., wind farms). It acknowledges the difficulty of the situation and the need to finance Estonian-language priorities through alternative sources.
2025-01-28
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Economic or expenditure guidelines are not addressed; there is no clear input regarding economic assessments or impacts.
2025-01-22
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing
A clear critique of the state budget: the view that taxpayer money must not be wasted or used to artificially sustain viable companies without proper due process; it emphasizes the necessity of economic decisions being based on transparency and consent. It deems budgetary integrity and cost control essential in the state's operations, particularly concerning Nordica's involvement.
2025-01-16
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Economically, the budget focuses on transparency, control, and the responsible allocation of revenues and expenditures. It highlights that detailed expenditure items must be clearly stipulated in the law itself, not merely in the explanatory memorandum, and emphasizes that resulting cost lines and state funds must be utilized transparently. It does not present an explicit, bureaucratic tax reform program, but stresses financial discipline, proper resource allocation, and accountability, which helps reduce inefficient redistribution.
2025-01-15
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Economic growth and financing are closely linked: the project is viewed as economically beneficial because it increases GDP revenue and the supplementary budget; emphasis is placed on the combination of European Union recovery funding and national financing, as well as protective revenues for Tallinn in the form of taxes paid back to the state; simultaneously, criticism is being raised regarding the government's economic policy, particularly concerning the rising costs of pharmaceuticals and healthcare services.
2025-01-15
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing
It highlights the magnitude of taxpayer spending and its connection to the handling of the Nordica case; it criticizes the scale of the expenditures and the imprudent signing of contracts. The broader economic context primarily addresses the issue of cost and accountability, rather than specific tax or fiscal policy recommendations.
2025-01-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
In terms of economic policy, he focuses on protecting consumer interests and guaranteeing a reasonable electricity price. He notes that the state failed to provide supplementary subsidies for additional investments and stresses the need for a balance between dividends, security of supply, and capital expenditure. He critically assesses budget cuts, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive impact analysis rather than focusing on short-term savings.
2024-12-17
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
Focuses on budget transparency as an economic policy need; criticizes budget confusion and prevailing cuts, emphasizes that changes must improve service accessibility and prevent concealment/misrepresentation of figures; highlights the transparency and control of expenses.
2024-12-12
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
Emphasizes control and transparency of financial expenditures; notes the increase in ministers' salaries due to indexation, which raises questions, and stresses a substantive discussion about tax increases, not just their voting.
2024-12-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
Regarding the economy and taxes, he emphasizes that the coalition's tax policy is damaging to the economy and the population: he emphasizes that raising VAT and income tax has a negative impact, and the tax break for banks benefits the banks, which is unfair. He rejects ideas that increase taxation and deepen poverty; he cites the reduction in revenue of 43 million euros as an example of the government's weakness in economic activity. He adheres to the principles of economic growth and improving the well-being of citizens, not increasing taxes.
2024-12-11
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth session, press briefing.
An economic policy moving towards the equator and solidarity. It wants to reduce tax increases that burden the population and increase the contribution of banks, noting that unfair tax benefits for banks and value-added tax systems reduce the overall revenue. It expresses criticism towards the tax increases planned by the coalition and emphasizes the need to regulate and equalize taxation.
2024-12-10
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
Data unavailable.
2024-12-04
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
The economic standpoint emphasizes the potential harmful effect of tax increases on revenue collection and consumer purchasing power; it opposes raising alcohol excise duties in 2025 and criticizes forecasts indicating a larger tax burden leading to a decrease in revenue. At the same time, it notes that taxation may be "enhanced" in certain cases, but the overall tone is cautious and the cheapest option is to keep tax burden under control. It suggests discussing whether emergency tax increases are necessary.
2024-12-04
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, press briefing
He emphasizes the need for thorough analysis in economic policy and is reluctant to implement tax changes unless there’s the necessary analysis. He refers to a decrease in tax revenue (43 million euros less than projected in September) and is open to considering a review of corporate profit taxation; he advocates for stable, research-based economic policy and rejects or reconsiders tax changes if the impact on the economy is negative.
2024-12-02
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
In economic policy, he/she is cautious and critical of tax increases; emphasizes thorough analysis, accurate forecasts, and the involvement of economic experts in the decision-making process. The viewpoint leans towards interactive assessment and desires an evidence-based approach when it comes to the state budget.
2024-11-20
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
A fiscally critical stance regarding tax increases and the price increases associated with them; emphasis is placed on the loss of purchasing power and the detrimental impact of income reduction on pensioners and local governments; budgetary action must ensure secure social safety nets and reduce the burden on vulnerable populations.
2024-11-20
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, press briefing.
A critical attitude towards tax increases and a desire to change economic policy that doesn’t consider people’s ability to cope. It is claimed that economic policy and taxes result in families having less money in their hands and worsen quality of life; the need to focus on increasing the income and purchasing power of residents is emphasized.
2024-11-18
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth Session, Plenary Session
Economically, emphasis is placed on listening to and involving entrepreneurs; the state budget is mentioned as a connecting question, but no specific tax policy proposals are presented.
2024-11-13
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.
Economic policy reflects skepticism regarding tax increases and emphasizes the need for a spending-based budget and transparency; it is believed that economic growth requires improved domestic demand and investment directed towards IT and AI services. Criticism is voiced concerning the impact of tax changes and their tendency to increase budget deficits, with reference made to IMF forecasts, and a call is made to approach the economy with a more flexible and consumer-protective vision. Their positions focus on the transparency of resource allocation and the prioritization of investments as an opportunity to improve growth potential.
2024-11-07
15th Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
An economic approach is moderately critical regarding significant expenditures: it highlights that expenditures are real money and revenues are "socio-economic" and must be distinguished; it emphasizes the need for funding sources, the mentioning of errors and risks, and the purposeful allocation of funds; it aims to avoid unreasonable losses to the state and supports transparent financing.
2024-11-06
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
It emphasizes the responsibility and transparent management of public spending and the role of performance-based budgeting and explanatory notes; it criticizes budget allocations that "roll over" and complicate the identification of expenditures; it highlights the need for close monitoring and efficiency improvements, as well as transparent cost-cutting, including in the reallocation of positions. It notes examples of half a million euros in cuts that do not reflect the actual cutting process.
2024-11-06
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, information briefing
The economic approach focuses on protecting the value of state assets and factoring in the reality of pricing; it emphasizes the necessity of accounting for fixed costs, labor expenses, and the depreciation of fixed assets during price formation, as well as the potential losses incurred if these are disregarded. Existing examples demonstrate that the price can be up to 30% lower than the average, a factor that must be considered within a transparent valuation process.
2024-11-05
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
Not enough data.
2024-11-04
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
Specific details regarding economic interests or financial considerations are absent; among the mentioned risks are potential financial volatility and the potential for revenue generation by the sub-federations, which could impact event organization costs or revenue streams. A clear economic program or priority is lacking.
2024-10-23
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
The focus is on people's financial coping, with the discussion centering on taxes, the car tax, and the financing of the social sector. Criticism has been voiced regarding the increasing burden and the impact of cuts, but a clear sense of economic policy direction is missing. It also shows skepticism toward contradictory tax policies and the responses provided by the Ministry of Finance.
2024-10-23
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, information briefing
Specific macroeconomic positions were not presented; instead, budget transparency and parliamentary oversight are emphasized as the framework for fiscal policy. Support was given to the idea that budgetary changes should not be made by a single minister without the involvement of the Riigikogu (Parliament), which signals a desire for fiscal discipline and transparency.
2024-10-22
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
On the economic level, the focus is on countering the effect that reduces tax revenue, and the desire is for policies that stimulate the economy and encourage consumption and investment. It is mentioned that the bank tax limits lending activity, and that the timing of high taxes is detrimental to economic growth.
2024-10-21
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The economic approach focuses on the responsiveness to tax changes and budgetary proportionality. There is a clear opposition to tax hikes (VAT, income tax, car tax, excise duties), emphasizing that these impact families' purchasing power. They advocate for the clear and proportional use of funding, prioritizing the protection of social needs.
2024-10-16
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
Supports increasing financial transparency and is critical of tax hikes that could impact the poorest citizens; emphasizes that income and expenditure lines must be visible, and that current tax policy changes may increase inflation and reduce purchasing power, meaning they must be carefully considered; believes that the public needs to see the real picture when state expenditures are being allocated.
2024-10-16
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, press briefing
In terms of economic outlook, there is opposition to sharp tax hikes; it is argued that taxes negatively affect economic activity and the financial coping ability of families. It is pointed out that neighboring countries are not increasing taxes, which creates competition detrimental to Estonia. The importance of a stable economic environment and the competitiveness of businesses is emphasized. Criticism is leveled at the contradictions between communication and policy, which only deepen uncertainty.
2024-10-15
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
When expressing economic views, the position opposes tax increases (the extensive raising of all taxes) and highlights their impact on household budgets and the economy. A cautionary tone is employed regarding potential income decline and the rising burden on car owners. The text emphasizes the need for thorough analysis and responsible fiscal policy, but offers no concrete alternatives.
2024-10-14
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
The economic perspective is crucial when examining the rising costs of healthcare and the resulting impact of these expenditures, not just on the economy, but specifically on vulnerable societal groups. It argues against raising treatment costs and fees (such as specialist visit charges, daily hospital fees, and increasing medicine prices), stressing that such increases exacerbate inequality and could undermine the nation's economic stability. Fiscal responsibility and budgetary constraints are highlighted as the primary reasons why the introduction of further additional costs must be resisted.
2024-10-09
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, information briefing
An economically critical assessment: It emphasizes taxpayer losses (losses exceeding 20 million euros) and the necessity of evaluating the national airline's sustainability. It highlights that the decision-making process concerning the role of the national carrier must be transparent, and potentially focus on airport infrastructure and potential alternatives. It does not emphasize investment in or widespread support for the national airline's structure.
2024-10-07
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
The text emphasizes clear revenue distribution and funding transparency: it demands that revenue collected from excise duties and the car tax be channeled directly into road infrastructure, noting that the allocation of these funds is currently under critical scrutiny. It expresses concern over the ambiguity and lack of clarity regarding the use of the money, and stresses the vital need for funding continuity and rigorous control.
2024-09-25
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
The measure supports the reduction of VAT for agricultural producers, viewing it as a means to boost the competitiveness of production. It is mentioned that the Centre Party has already submitted relevant draft legislation supporting this initiative, and the support of coalition partners and the government is now requested.
2024-09-25
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, press briefing
Very clearly opposes the cutting of funding for extracurricular activities; emphasizes that the funding must be maintained and that it is valuable for the family and the child's development. It does not present broad macroeconomic or tax-specific recommendations; instead, it focuses on educational support and family assistance.
2024-09-24
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting
Not enough data
2024-09-19
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
Economic viewpoints are characterized by a focus on families' financial relief and concern for inflation and the cost of living. Talking about taxes as a means to collect money to feed families (school meals, school sports support, extracurricular education) and the idea of a digital tax for foreign large corporations, it emphasizes a balanced tax burden and the need for a more equitable distribution of it. It is against a bank tax and stresses the need not to burden those who are long-term profit earners, but to focus on the well-being of families and young people.
2024-09-18
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, press briefing
The economic policy approach is budgetary prudence and cost optimization without additional taxes for ordinary citizens; it favors targeted taxes, such as a windfall profit tax on banks, as a source of supplementary revenue, and emphasizes the necessity of directing funds directly to the structural needs of specific sectors (e.g., healthcare). The outlined critique is based on the redistribution of costs and the protection of vulnerable people.
2024-09-17
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The focus is on the assessment of social and fiscal consequences; it criticizes car tax cuts and the coordination of support for, or opposition to, these measures. It emphasizes that the redistribution of tax revenue and insufficient support measures increase the risk of poverty, especially among people with disabilities. It does not represent broad economic policy rhetoric, but rather stresses the necessity of budgetary principles that are thrifty and restrictive, yet fairly targeted.
2024-09-16
The 15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting.
Insufficient data.
2024-07-15
15th Riigikogu, Extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
From an economic standpoint, the central issue is the opposition to the widespread implementation of the car tax. Instead, emphasis is placed on the necessity of focusing on carefully targeted measures and tax benefits specifically for disabled individuals. Concerns are raised regarding the administrative burden and the actual scope of support coverage. Additional benefits are preferred over the car tax, as they could be more effective and better targeted. Maintaining the balance between funding and expenditure remains a key priority.
2024-06-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, additional plenary session
Critiques the government's economic approach, stressing that cuts and tax increases harm the economy and fail to deliver meaningful growth. Recommends pro-growth measures and alternative financing methods (such as a windfall profit tax on banks and reforms aimed at reducing bureaucracy). Seeks solutions that would balance state revenues and expenditures without adversely affecting vulnerable populations, and underscores the necessity of preparing a budget with a strategic, long-term perspective.
2024-06-12
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.
At the heart of the economic discussion are scale taxes and costs, where the central point of criticism is the government’s unreasonably escalating taxes and fines, which undermine people’s ability to cope financially and exacerbate social inequality. It argues that hiking fines and state fees is an economic policy that amounts to a "tax on government incompetence," and stresses the necessity of not increasing the burden on the poor and the middle class. It calls for transparency and fair compensation (for example, increasing damages awarded for non-pecuniary harm).
2024-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
Economically, the emphasis is placed on freezing the funding and channeling the released resources to support Georgian civil society; precise figures or a detailed macroeconomic analysis are lacking.
2024-06-10
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Economically, the stance is critical of the proposed cuts: it is stressed that these reductions could result in a revenue loss of 20–30 million euros, and a transparent and responsible fiscal policy is preferred. He/She emphasizes long-term economic sustainability and accountability over short-term savings, viewing short-term cuts critically as potentially detrimental. The demand is for accurate forecasts and an economic debate that properly accounts for the balance between revenues and expenditures.
2024-06-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
A key criticism in economic policy targets all increases to the car tax, state fees, and fines, as well as taxation implemented purely for the sake of meeting budget targets. It is argued that state fees and fines are increasing oppressively and could actually reduce overall revenue if people are unable to pay them. Critics stress that the state should ensure services remain affordable and avoid disproportionate measures that would damage the economy. The primary objective should be protecting economic growth and living standards, and fostering entrepreneurship, rather than penalizing it.
2024-06-03
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary sitting.
Critical of the government's economic policy: notes the recession, rising prices, and declining exports; calls for impact assessments regarding the austerity policy and tax burdens; at the same time, emphasizes the need for feasibility and transparency in economic growth plans; condemns the uncontrolled growth of expenditures and the costs associated with digital solutions.
2024-05-29
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The economic views center on capping tax rates and halting the expansion of the revenue base for local municipalities. The proponents seek alternative sources of income (such as a digital tax or abandoning the proposed income tax reform for the wealthy) and criticize the state’s budget cuts and the "stripping" or "fleecing" of the populace through taxation.
2024-05-29
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, information briefing
A negative and resistant viewpoint is represented regarding economic issues; tax changes, including the taxation of pensioners, the sugar tax, the car tax, and the raising of state fees and fines, are considered unpopular and politically motivated, and they are being voted against as a tentative choice before the elections. He emphasizes that these measures are planned for implementation after the elections, not because they are economically unavoidable, and they potentially have a negative impact on voter support.
2024-05-28
15th Riigikogu, third session, plenary session
The economic position emphasizes avoiding the taxation of pensioners and reducing inequality; it is critical of draft legislation that would increase the tax burden on pensioners and widen the social gap; regarding the taxation of banks, the necessity of not increasing the burden is stressed.
2024-05-27
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary session
The text expresses support for substantial social benefits for disabled people and potential tax exemptions. It highlights the rising cost of living and jokes that the proposed benefits might not even cover the revenue generated by the car tax. Furthermore, it demonstrates a critical stance against a unilateral interpretation of fiscal policy, focusing instead on the social and inflationary impacts.
2024-05-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Economically, critics highlight the bureaucracy and administrative burden these draft laws would create: small businesses and local governments would be overwhelmed by the load, and the legislation itself would fail to provide any significant added value. There is strong criticism regarding the proposed penalty measures and the overall negative effect on the business environment. The preference is for less regulation and a greater focus on practical implementation.
2024-05-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, press briefing
Emphasis is placed on the necessity of impact analysis and concrete steps for economic recovery; there is opposition to the plan to abolish the tax hump, and a warning that unbalanced changes in tax benefits and expenditures may diminish the country's competitiveness. The criticism focuses on the fact that budget cuts and tax increases cannot be recommended without a thorough impact assessment; there is a need to frame economic policy in an economically sound and prioritized manner.
2024-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
It is mentioned that the draft legislation may increase the administrative burden and require additional staff, pointing to potential expenditures. There is no concrete position regarding taxes or the state budget; concerns are raised regarding staff shortages and the need for training.
2024-05-13
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The text emphasizes the impact of financial constraints on citizens in the context of state fees and bailiff costs, along with ideas for alleviating these burdens within the financially demanding administrative system. It does not present a broader tax or economic policy program; the issues raised point to the need for improved accessibility and cost reduction, but no concrete policy measures were proposed.
2024-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session.
Speakers in economic policy have prioritized not increasing the tax burden, and the impact of plans to abolish the tax 'hump' is considered critical. There is an ongoing discussion regarding the tax on banks' excess profits, and a desire to see the budget shortfall addressed through balanced taxation and tax hikes. There is a strong emphasis on the need to avoid bureaucracy and ensure efficient resource utilization. Furthermore, the focus remains on impact and transparency (for instance, providing clear information regarding the tax rates applied to compensation for non-pecuniary damage and parking fines).
2024-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
A position has been highlighted in economic policy that increasing fines and state fees must not harm vulnerable groups, and balanced measures must be chosen to fulfill the budget. The speech emphasizes the need for impact analyses and criticism regarding the significant economic downturn, high inflation, and employment uncertainty. Frugal positions lean toward protecting the vulnerable and insist on analytical policy, rather than one based on explicit short-term revenue.
2024-05-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Expectations and criticism focus on tax and expenditure policy. This stems from concerns regarding additional taxes (such as the car tax and other levies) and criticism directed at the redistribution of costs associated with teachers' salary increases. The text emphasizes the economical and transparent use of the state budget and resources, highlighting the requirement for demanding the return of funds (clawbacks) as a fundamental guarantee of a state governed by the rule of law.
2024-05-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
A critical attitude is expressed regarding the government's economic performance in the education sector; it highlights that the coalition's promised salary increase to 120% of the Estonian average has not been fulfilled. While supporting the increase of teachers' salaries in line with the commitments, it is emphasized that the government has failed to find a solution, which stems from issues of efficiency and management.
2024-05-02
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
On the economic level, he opposes broad tax increases; he emphasizes that additional burdens during start-up periods are detrimental and desires strong economic growth and an environment that fosters entrepreneurship. He stresses the need for EU legal compliance and control over state aid, as well as the need for a clear and well-justified solution for healthcare funding.
2024-04-30
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session.
The focus on economic pressure highlights that increased fines and state fees are a "new source of income" for filling the budget, and this approach contradicts the idea of not burdening citizens. The position is critical of the coalition's economic policy: taxation and fine increases implemented for the sake of the budget must not push people into poverty, and the impact on people's livelihoods and the accessibility of goods and services must be assessed.
2024-04-29
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The economic policy perspective is critical of the revenues and expenditures related to the car tax. The primary criticism concerns the utility of the taxation and the risk of diminished purchasing power. There is a desire to use the revenues for road construction or innovation, while simultaneously demanding exceptions (for long-term households and people with disabilities) and a review of the tax's quality. It is emphasized that taxes must not exacerbate poverty.
2024-04-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
Not enough data
2024-04-16
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The overall economic situation is critical: Opposing funding cuts to school and recreational sports, and opposing redistribution. Supports maintaining funding and emphasizes that money must be clearly allocated, not lost or causing confusion.
2024-04-15
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary session
It emphasizes that the bill’s rationale is budget implementation and a fiscal objective; it criticizes that the impact is non-existent or has been insufficiently addressed recently; it demands an impact assessment that would evaluate the effect on the economy and public safety.
2024-04-10
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
A clearly defined economic policy position: supporting entrepreneurship during the crisis, opposing excessive fines and the expansion of administrative procedures that could harm businesses. The position supports the use of existing legal mechanisms (misdemeanor proceedings) and raises concerns about the burden placed on companies. It criticizes the government's trend of increasing punitive measures.
2024-04-10
15th Estonian Parliament, third sitting, information briefing
Opposes the car tax and other tax hikes that disproportionately burden low-income earners. It emphasizes that eliminating tax breaks for the wealthy could increase budget revenue and reduce inequality (referencing the specific call to abolish tax concessions for the rich). Furthermore, it highlights that reforms may either benefit or harm various groups—such as teachers and pensioners—and the central focus remains on fiscal impact and fairness.
2024-04-09
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Economically, emphasis is placed on a stable and predictable business environment; [the subject] is critical of rapid or excessive tax changes and stringent regulations, as these could drive investments outside of Estonia. He/She stresses the need for impact assessments and transparent regulation to prevent investment losses.
2024-04-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
In the economic context, there is a critical view of tax increases (car tax, sugar tax) and the growing strain they place on family budgets. It is stressed that existing support measures do not compensate for all costs, and budgets must be managed carefully and responsibly. The necessity for differentiation and additional support measures is highlighted, rather than burdening the population through the introduction of new taxes.
2024-04-03
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
It supports increasing teachers' salaries and criticizes the postponement of even minor steps (such as the 17-euro increase). It stresses the importance of reaching the promised level (120% of the Estonian average) and accounting for regional salary differences. Furthermore, it demonstrates a critical attitude towards the government’s inefficient spending, highlighting the relationship between economic efficiency and social costs within the education sector.
2024-04-03
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
Focuses on tax economics and state budget financing mechanisms; criticism of the income tax emphasizes that it does not work without supplementary measures; advocates for additional taxes (bank tax, digital tax) and taxes related to large profits of companies and cash flow; supports lower VAT on fruits and vegetables, emphasizing targeted funding and a bold state farm.
2024-04-02
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
Critical of the car tax, the speaker argues that it increases the overall tax burden (including through VAT and excise duties) and clearly fails to effectively generate jobs or economic growth. At the same time, the speaker emphasizes the necessity of maintaining or increasing aid, special provisions, and road investments, while criticizing economic policies that compel residents to leave rural areas.
2024-04-01
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Macroeconomically critical of the government's tax policy; opposes the expansion of sugar and car taxes, arguing this increases the burden on large families, and emphasizes the resulting decrease in purchasing power and the impact of the economic crisis. It recommends that, alongside addressing the budget shortfall, the state should increase revenue through a bank excess profits tax or a digital tax, while simultaneously curbing broad-based tax policies that harm the most vulnerable.
2024-03-20
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, press briefing.
Economically, the stance on the car tax is critical and controversial; it is stressed that the draft legislation will introduce additional costs and potential risks. Funding proposals are being put forward (a tax on banks' excess profits, abandoning the promise to eliminate the tax hump), and the necessity of ensuring the availability of social support measures to protect vulnerable groups is highlighted.
2024-03-19
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Criticism is leveled against the sugar tax and broader fiscal policy, emphasizing that taxation does not solve health problems. Instead, the focus must be on creating an economic environment that ensures greater tax revenue through improved economic activity. The speaker stresses the establishment of a foundation for healthcare based on a sustainable financing model (a continuous and favorable economic environment). There is also criticism regarding the crude reliance on budget and tax structures (referred to as the "Excel spreadsheet"), which appears to deepen existing fiscal monitoring problems. This demonstrates the need for alignment and balance between economic growth and healthcare funding.
2024-03-18
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
We are not submitting separate proposals for taxes or tax hikes; the emphasis is on the economic benefit achieved through reducing the administrative burden. A unified register consumes fewer resources by eliminating duplicate registry creation and bureaucracy.
2024-03-13
15th Estonian Parliament, third sitting, information briefing
The protection of the economic environment is the primary concern: he is critical of the draft administrative and punitive measures, seeing that they could diminish the business environment and the economy. At the same time, he emphasizes the need to support businesses during the crisis and refers to expert recommendations for economic stimulation, which contradicts harsh penalties and restrictions. Exemptions from the car tax for disabled people are viewed as a social expenditure, but the overall direction remains balanced and supportive of economic growth.
2024-03-11
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The economic narrative focuses on social protection and tax benefits that are financially distributed equally. It opposes the car tax, proposing instead to replace it with an excess profits tax targeting banks. It emphasizes that tax reforms should channel subsidies (for large families, single parents, school meals) and establish better mechanisms rather than relying on a wealth tax. Furthermore, in the context of tax funding and economic uncertainty, it highlights the need to prioritize family and child benefits, along with the purchasing power and housing options for young people.
2024-03-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, press briefing
Economically, the criticism of taxes is represented by opposition to the car tax. Due to its broad impact, critics are demanding changes and proposing a windfall (or excess profits) tax as an alternative. The debate regarding state investments in infrastructure (specifically road construction) is being lost. Instead, emphasis is placed on the overall effect of the tax changes and the risk that people may be forced to pay significantly more if needed (for example, increasing the cost of car ownership by up to 15%). Critics argue that this disproportionately burdens vulnerable groups, and they are calling for a comprehensive review of the tax and financing system to ensure financial fairness and clear purpose.
2024-03-04
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
Within the economic context, the stance on the car tax is critical: it is burdensome, diminishing both purchasing power and economic growth. The cumulative effect of various taxes (VAT, excise, and the car tax) must be assessed, as it disproportionately impacts lower-income groups. Taxing the excess profits of banks is favored as an alternative in the fiscal sphere, alongside a desire for infrastructure investments. However, an official impact analysis is demanded before proceeding with any significantly broader measures.
2024-02-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
It focuses on the economic impacts of mechanisms that increase the tax burden: it highlights price increases (VAT, excise duty) and the increased costs associated with vehicles; it stresses that the car tax generates additional costs and could potentially reduce investments in the road network. It proposes an alternative (a one-time additional bank tax) and points to the budget and depreciation as potential funding channels.
2024-02-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
Economically, the speaker opposes tax increases, emphasizing that such measures would raise costs for car owners and subsequently diminish the volume of future investments. He argues that the proposed car tax and high consumption taxation could decrease vehicle usage and restrict infrastructure development efforts. He recommends directing resources more efficiently and focusing on improving mobility in rural areas.
2024-02-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting.
The effectiveness of state funding allocated to education in driving economic growth is highlighted, confirming the profitability of such investment: an investment in higher education returns 4 euros to the economy for every euro invested. The aim is to allocate at least 1.5% of GDP to fund higher education institutions. The effects of underfunding on the economy and the sustainability of the financing system are in direct contradiction.
2024-02-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
Criticism of the PM’s economic plan, which could lead to cuts in road maintenance expenditure; it is emphasized that investments in road upkeep must not decrease. Regarding the proposed car tax, there is a question about its impact on the balance between traffic and investments; the general attitude leans toward maintaining or increasing investments, alongside a partial crisis in tax policy.
2024-02-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
Economic reports focus on the impact of tax policy on the general economy and the tourism sector, emphasizing the need to balance these effects. They advocate for decision-making rooted in impact assessments and suggest maintaining or lowering the tax rate to stimulate growth and mitigate losses. Furthermore, the reports stress the importance of regional tax balance and achieving a broad-based economic effect.
2024-01-24
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Specific economic policy proposals are absent; criticism has been raised regarding the significant impact of accelerated tax bills and amendments. It emphasizes the necessity of conducting impact assessments and substantive preliminary discussions before implementing the state budget and tax commitments. It does not represent a concrete economic policy program, but it is critical of the legitimacy of economic decisions made in haste.
2024-01-24
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The economic position focuses on the adequacy of funding for teachers' salaries and affirms that the base funding must come from the state, while acknowledging the role of supplementary bonuses provided by local governments. It is critical regarding the reallocation and targeted use of state funds, and emphasizes accountability and control over how the money is spent; it advocates for a clear employee remuneration policy and warnings against the misuse of funding.
2024-01-23
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Economic development must stem from investments in education and science. It emphasizes a balanced role for both the public and private sectors and calls for robust tax incentives for corporate research and development activities. A clear objective is established: 3% of GDP dedicated to R&D investment, with 2% sourced from the private sector and 1% from the state. Furthermore, the preference is that these funds are not diverted to other sectors but are added directly to education and science. This approach requires greater private sector participation and a competitive salary structure within higher education and research institutions.
2024-01-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The economic vision focuses on tax changes as a means of reforming the tax system; they are seeking the optimal income tax rate and coalition support, which suggests a reformist and growth-promoting direction, but specific figures are not provided.
2024-01-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
Supports state funding for the education salary pool; emphasizes that the money must come from the national budget, and local government budgets should not be the primary source for covering teachers’ salaries; is critical of the funding mechanism proposed by its coalition partners.
2024-01-16
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
No clear economic standpoints were presented (taxes, spending, regulation, employment). Not enough data.
2024-01-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
The situation is economically critical concerning the execution of major projects; it emphasizes that the question of project implementation capacity and budget strain immediately arises. He/She stresses the need to discuss economically critical risks and offers no positive endorsement for rapid and costly major projects.
2024-01-11
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
Insufficient data.
2024-01-10
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
No economic policy indicators or macroeconomic positions were presented; the link to ESM mechanisms is a subject of discussion, but specific economic policy standpoints are not being put forward.
2024-01-10
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
In economic terms, the priority is boosting growth potential through investments; tax hikes are viewed as detrimental tools that stifle economic activity. The decline in purchasing power and the growing number of jobs are critically important key metrics. It is stressed that the budget requires specific expenditure lines and dedicated investment lines. Critique of Redistribution: Redistribution policies do not increase the wealth of local municipalities.
2024-01-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
The economic critique regarding tax hikes is excessive, coupled with an emphasis on central funding for education and investments designed to utilize European funds. The entity is skeptical of the argument that local municipalities should take on additional resources, preferring instead systemic, state-level responsibility and resources. The text stresses the necessary balance between the effects of taxation and the development of infrastructure and human capital.