By Months: Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart

The political platform is heavily geared towards improving social welfare, particularly by assisting pensioners via a pension supplement that they intend to roll out nationally. A second key focus is the swift and strict regulation of the out-of-control situation concerning light personal vehicles and small mopeds, emphasizing the protection of human health above the freedom to conduct business. The speaker positions themselves as a strong critic of government inaction, particularly in light of recent tragic accidents.

The political position is strongly opposed to the car tax, which is deemed unconstitutional and socially unjust, as it forces disabled people to give up their vehicles. The stance is fiercely oppositional and outcome-focused, criticizing the government's actions as "tax chaos" and a "tax circus." The main areas of emphasis are directed toward the specific needs of disabled people and the protection of family benefits.

Based on this text, the speaker is strongly oppositional: criticism is directed at the government's tax policy, wasteful spending, and the widespread collection and monitoring of data. They emphasize anti-corruption oversight, responses to the protection of constitutional rights, and the careless attitude towards the government's "Toompea politics" and the independence of local municipalities. The position is strongly values-based, focusing on the protection of citizens’ rights and transparency, and demanding political accountability; changes are recommended in both tax and economic policy, as well as in the use of public funds.

As a representative of the Centre Party, they emphasize the safety of the urban environment and the protection of the health of residents: they are a strong proponent of regulation regarding personal mobility devices (age, driving license, and helmet requirements) and emphasize the increased power of local governments to regulate the placement of services. At the same time, they are critical of high tax increases and emphasize the protection of the interests of consumers and taxpayers, and the need to restore public trust. They present sectoral changes as policy- and value-based questions and emphasize transparency and democratic discussion.

The main themes are legal policy and the place of forms of punitive mechanisms. He firmly opposes the Social Democrats' plan to turn the Competition Authority into a punitive body and the courts into a fining body, emphasizing the risk to the constitution and the creation of a Pandora's Box. He also stresses that the form of minor offenses proceedings is standard and that the Ombudsman/Supreme Court are authoritative references for him, emphasizing the need to humanize the coping of pensioners and entrepreneurs and the contradiction in tax policy. The overall tone is strongly critical and emphasizes the protection of fundamental rights; the focus is on preserving norms and the traditional framework, and he doesn’t appear ready for radical changes without clear guarantees.

The core position focuses on criticizing the government's tax policy and ensuring the legal consistency and differentiation of car taxes; it highlights the protection of families with children and people with disabilities, as well as increasing state transparency and anti-corruption oversight. As an opposition, it is strongly critical of tax policy and the government's management style, emphasizing that financial decisions are uncertain and budget necessities are based on an "Excel spreadsheet." Framing is central to policy and legal issues, highlighting the protection of rules and people, and periodic accountability.

The Centre Party representative emphasizes the unconstitutionality of the car tax and the fight against it; strongly critical of the government's tax policy and highlighting the burden on consumers and families, presented as a migration crisis. They have affirmed that they want the car tax abolished and compensated for, and consider the tax an unequal burden on people with disabilities and large families. They also emphasize increased anti-corruption oversight and transparency, demanding thorough special audits regarding the state budget and large contracts. Regarding changes, they have shown criticism towards the current coalition's actions and stress that local values and the interests of taxpayers must be protected.

A strong opposition to the government's economic policy, highlighting the burden of taxes and price increases on ordinary people, and wanting better protection of incomes (e.g., the impact of income tax and value-added tax). Demands the taxation of banks' excess profits as part of a fairer tax system and promises resistance to the coalition's tax policy, which they portray as temporary and detrimental to voters. Claims that rushing the amendment of the constitution before the elections is problematic and desires a democratic, transparent decision-making process.

The main topics are anti-corruption control and budget transparency, which are desired to be more precisely defined by legislation; the construction of Tallinn Hospital and broader regional health infrastructure development are a priority; a critical attitude towards government decisions, especially concerning the 2022 Tallinn Hospital funding loss and the Nordica connection case; emphasizes the protection of public interest and the wellbeing of residents, along with a willingness to cooperate, provided conditions remain within the bounds of public benefit.