By Plenary Sessions: Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart

Energy policy must be strategic and transparent, not simply a vehicle for ideological rushes. The opposition stresses the importance of energy security and a stable economic foundation, and objects to the rapid methods of implementing the green transition that increase the burden on taxpayers and consumers. Furthermore, they demand accountability and transparency in the anti-corruption context, including the minister's resignation and increased oversight by the Riigikogu (Parliament).

Critical of the continuing ownership policy, which is being carried out under strict control; the speaker emphasizes that the payment of dividends by state-owned enterprises reduces investment and raises consumer prices. He stresses the protection of affordable travel for consumers and market competition, and asks directly whether the ownership policy will be changed if such a practice continues. The style is policy-driven, featuring substantive criticism and advocating for consumer interests.

The most crucial issues are constitutional reform and democracy, which the representative believes are being jeopardized for the sake of gaining quick political advantages. He/She stands with the strong opposition and stresses that any changes must be implemented transparently, constitutionally, and accompanied by impact assessments. The framing centers on core values (justice, the rule of law, security) and contrasts sharply with fast-tracked changes, which are viewed merely as a political instrument.

The most crucial topics are the amendment of laws and registration entries, as well as the intervention of religious organizations. He/She emphasizes that the current legislation allows for intervention when necessary and attempts to demonstrate that the government's intention to change the laws jeopardizes legal clarity and people's freedoms. The position is strongly opposed to the plans to amend the law, viewing them as dangerous to the rule of law, and maintains a consistent, admonishing rhetoric. It staunchly defends the existing legal framework, arguing that the problem is actually created by the narratives of the ministers and the commission, rather than the laws themselves.

The most crucial topics are offshore wind farms, the size of state aid, and the transparency of these matters within the decision-making process. The stance is critical regarding the coalition: it is emphasized that decisions must not be made in closed party meetings, and there is a need to involve the wider public and institutions; there is a strong desire for a democratic and transparent mechanism, rather than partisan haste.

It emphasizes the opposition to the government and the Reform Party; is critical of the government's income tax policy concerning banks and shows a preference for balanced taxation, utilizing comparisons and irony as rhetorical devices. It stresses that the tax system should be fairer and more systematic for the general public, and criticizes the government's focus on various sectors. The critique is policy-driven, rather than relying on personal confrontation.

The main political platform centers on opposing the current coalition's transport policy. They argue that free public transport in rural areas was eliminated because of the 2023 coalition. Furthermore, funding hasn't increased, no new routes are being added, and ridership isn't growing. This stance is strongly oppositional, focusing heavily on policy and results, and stresses the necessity of restoring or increasing funding and improving the public transport network.

The speaker represents a strong opposition to the government and its economic policy, stressing that the public's opinion must therefore be given greater weight, while focusing heavily on the plight of ordinary families. He criticizes the coalition's priorities, noting that their concerns are directed more toward the wealthy than the general populace. He describes the use of fear tactics involving EKRE as evidence of a political strategy, asserting that the people will deliver the final verdict in the upcoming elections. His overall framework is populist, emphasizing the interests of the common people, coupled with a value-based critique of current economic policy.

A strong oppositional stance regarding the government's economic policy; it emphasizes that the burdens of VAT, income tax, and car tax reduce household incomes. It highlights the link between people's welfare and the functioning of the state as a priority, and calls on the government to change its approach and present a clear economic recovery plan.

The speaker is strongly opposed to the Foreign Minister and criticizes the conduct of the party representative. The speaker suggests that party members are innocent, while simultaneously raising allegations of fraud and claiming that seats in the Riigikogu were obtained through donations from Ukraine. He stresses that the minister's reply was inappropriate. The focus of the position is on ethics and protocol during parliamentary discussions, rather than specific policy fields.

An opposition representative, confirmedly critical of the government's economic policy. He fights against increases in personal taxes and promotes taxing banks' excess profits as an alternative source of funding, emphasizing that current measures primarily harm low-income individuals. He argues that temporary tax hikes are unreliable and promises that if the Center Party (Keskerakond) comes to power, the car tax and other tax increases will be abolished; his position is strongly policy-driven and resistant to new ideas in the competitive sector.