By Plenary Sessions: Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart

The text refers to the flow of discussions within the Special Committee Against Corruption and Riigikogu sessions, noting the lack of transparency in the process and the absence of a response concerning the minutes and slides. References to previous weeks and the comprehensive parliamentary debate are also brought to the fore.

Speeches presented during the Information Hour on 26.02.2025; demonstrating consistent attendance at information sessions and a readiness to immediately pose questions and provide examples. References related to previous statements are utilized, emphasizing the necessity of receiving clear answers to their inquiries (concerning dividend and ownership policy). This illustrates firm, regular participation and the continuous discussion of current issues.

He/She participated in the Riigikogu plenary discussions on 25.02.2025, highlighting the connections between local roles and the context of Tallinn (as a Member of the Tallinn City Council). He/She clearly presents critical observations and demands concrete examples and impact analyses, regularly demonstrating active participation and the steering of discussions deemed merely "parliamentary window dressing."

The addresses were delivered during the plenary session on February 19, 2025, and reflect consistent engagement in discussions taking place within the legal committees. A critical reproach has been leveled against the government’s proposed legislative changes, and there is a strong emphasis on the enforcement of existing legal regulations, which demonstrates sustained, primarily legal focus within the scope of the committee's activities.

It highlights regular information sessions and committee discussions and refers to previous repeated attention to the matter. It notes that the topic has already been discussed in the special committee on combating corruption, and further debate in the Riigikogu and the processing of draft legislation are anticipated.

Appears before the plenary session of the Riigikogu; delivers two speeches during the same day, the first of which is criticism related to economic policy, and the second describes the provisions of the Riigikogu Rules of Procedure and the nuances of the proceedings. The texts demonstrate direct participation in the plenary sessions and utilize both political criticism and procedural explanation. Limited information only allows for a general picture of regular appearances throughout a single day.

The activity is demonstrated in a single speech delivered in the plenary hall, where past decisions and the current situation are addressed. A reference is made to previous changes implemented in cooperation with the opposition, as well as to planned reforms that have been incorporated, all of which demonstrate continuous attention to the issue of public transport.

Takes the floor during the plenary session, delivering multiple speeches on the same day (February 12, 2025), referencing the information hour, and continuing the discussion within the Riigikogu. This creates the impression of consistent and active involvement, characterized by frequently repeated criticisms directed at various parties. This demonstrates a high level of engagement and continuous participation in debates at both the parliamentary and extra-parliamentary levels.

Three speeches delivered during the same Q&A session; cites data from the Institute of Economic Research and international comparisons; presents challenges and questions to the government.

No data available.

Shows intensive daytime activity in plenary sessions: multiple comments on the same day (2025-02-10) and follow-up remarks on various topics. This includes adjacent issues (taxes, long-term care, budget transparency, conclusions of the National Audit Office) and references to IT or media usage questions. It appears that the speeches and reactions are consistent and engage directly with specific ministers and political parties during the same session.