By Plenary Sessions: Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart

The main objective is the discussion and review of energy policy in the Riigikogu and adherence to the development plan; rigorous cooperation and transparency in legislative processes, including the proposal to initiate criminal proceedings regarding the offshore wind farm draft legislation and the issue of ministerial accountability.

Priorities include the modification of ownership and dividend policies in state-owned enterprises, emphasizing the need to clarify if and how these terms will be changed. It highlights compliance with CO2 standards and the regulatory aspects of the green transition as components of the austerity policy. It mentions that there is or was a lack of legislative progress in answering these questions, and stresses the continued demand for concrete plans and action from the government.

The primary focus is directed toward the draft constitutional amendment and its proceedings; it emphasizes that impact assessments and comprehensive analysis have not been conducted, and demands clearer examples and a thorough evaluation. It argues that the proposal is a bluff and envisions how a rapid amendment could damage the foundations of the rule of law.

The focus is on the implementation and protection of existing legislation, particularly Section 14, subsection 2 of the Churches and Congregations Act. Opposition is expressed to plans to amend the law in a way that would allow for the artificial creation of unlawful activity or a registry entry targeting religious organizations. The issue of confidence in existing legal remedies and the limits of state authority is raised.

The primary objective is a reviewed and democratic process for the drafts, not rushing. Furthermore, it is stressed that the auctions scheduled for April require careful assessment and the alignment of state aid approvals with energy policy ambitions. Should there be any legislative movement, there is a recognized need for broad-based debate and the inclusion of expert opinion.

Stresses the significance of Section 70 of the Riigikogu Rules of Procedure and Internal Rules Act and the right to a rebuttal; raises debate on how a member, even when mentioned by name, can be influenced via the right to reply. There is an absence of specifically highlighted legislative initiatives or positions (support for/opposition to) regarding draft legislation; the focus remains on procedural aspects.

The legislative focus is centered on public transport reform and funding mechanisms. It highlights that amendments have been submitted and the further progression of the reform is awaited. This demonstrates the role as an initiator and advocate of legislative changes, while emphasizing the coalition's lack of progress.

Not enough data

The legislative focus is centered on criticism of tax policy and budgetary issues; the first concrete demands are absent, but the need for three specific steps to revitalize the economy is emphasized.

The focus is on parliamentary protocol and the appropriateness of the responses; specific legislative initiatives or objectives are not mentioned.

The main directions are tax administration and budgetary regulations: it seeks the taxation of banks' excess profits and significant critical attention to the legitimization of temporary tax increases and the possibility of their repeal by future governments. It refers to the study of the plan, including increasing the transparency of budgetary and distribution policy related to the care reform in light of the conclusions of the National Audit Office. It issues a plan for submitting analyses regarding the impact of draft legislation (e.g., bank taxation, changes to the car tax) and political decisions on children and society.