By Plenary Sessions: Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart

It refers to the involvement of other opposition factions (e.g., the Centre Party, EKRE) and mentions like-minded individuals from the Reform Party as providing a critical contribution from colleagues; it demonstrates a readiness for broad-based discussion and, if necessary, cooperation associated with the initiation of criminal cases.

Not enough data

Not enough data

Not enough data

They seek open cooperation and broader engagement with experts, scientists, and institutions (the National Audit Office, special committees, and anti-corruption organizations). The aim is to establish a public roundtable and democratic debate, and to reduce the proportion of decisions made behind closed doors.

There is insufficient data regarding any cooperative or conciliatory efforts; the texts focus on criticism and procedural debate, with no clear indication of involvement from cooperation or coalition partners. The available data does not allow us to conclude that there is any readiness for cooperation.

He points to previous cooperation with the Social Democrats and confirms his willingness to work together, but stresses that the amendment he introduced did not receive support from the coalition. He demonstrates readiness for cooperation, but acknowledges that the current opposition and the general lack of acceptance are impeding collaboration.

Not enough data

Limited readiness for cooperation; does not initiate broad cooperation efforts, focusing oppositionally on criticism and demanding concrete steps.

No data available

There is no clear, significant willingness to cooperate; the impression is that the leading platform or agenda values the ideas of other parties (e.g., the Reform Party's rhetoric on legal certainty and trust, the Centre Party's bank tax proposals), but there is no mention of a specific form of cooperation or concrete cooperation projects. The focus is primarily on respecting the opposition's separate viewpoint.