By Plenary Sessions: Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart
Total Sessions: 163
Fully Profiled: 163
2025-10-16
XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
The collaborative approach is highly supportive of the submitter of the popular initiative, whose efforts and arguments are acknowledged. The speaker stresses the necessity of quickly drafting the popular initiative into a bill, indicating a readiness to work alongside the initiative's supporters.
2025-10-08
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
There is no direct mention of cross-party cooperation, but the speaker stresses the necessity of involving the association of disabled people and top legal experts in the legislative drafting process. Regarding the car tax bill, he advocates for completing the first reading to enable the submission of amendments, suggesting a pragmatic willingness to improve the legislation.
2025-10-08
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Information Hour
Demonstrates cooperation with their political party (the Centre Party) in the submission of draft legislation. It also refers to previous support from ministry officials for the draft bill on a unified insurance obligation, which failed to gain political approval.
2025-10-07
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
Insufficient data.
2025-10-06
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The speaker focuses on the opposition and initiatives of their own political party (the Center Party), referencing the Center Party's draft bill aimed at introducing special provisions for people with disabilities. There is a complete absence of any reference to cooperation with coalition partners or a willingness to compromise regarding the car tax issue.
2025-09-24
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
Demonstrates limited willingness to cooperate—emphasizes a factional proposal and the need for broad-based debate, but fails to highlight broader, multi-party cooperation or compromise proposals. The absence of local coalitions or a sincere joint decision is not emphasized.
2025-09-22
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
Data unavailable
2025-09-17
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting.
Critical, yet it partially demonstrates a readiness for discussion and external consultation, referencing the hearing of viewpoints from other institutions and officials (PPA, Health Insurance Fund, Ministry of Finance). However, it emphasizes that any compromise must be grounded in fundamental rights and established conclusions, and calls on the government to withdraw the draft bill, which suggests an unreliable capacity for cooperation with the coalition. While a search for cooperation is partially evident, it is preceded by a strong block of criticism.
2025-09-17
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, press briefing.
Requests and emphasizes cooperation through parliamentary channels (special committee, Riigikogu members, Minister of Finance). At the same time, it stresses transparency and information sharing, demonstrating a readiness for cooperation if it enhances accountability and oversight.
2025-09-16
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
He/She addresses the Chancellor of Justice respectfully, demonstrating a readiness to cooperate with both the Chancellor of Justice and the Prosecutor's Office, while seeking guidance and clarification. His/Her approach is centered on cooperation and oversight.
2025-09-15
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting
Insufficient data
2025-09-11
15th Riigikogu, 6th plenary sitting
It confirms cooperation with colleagues and law enforcement: the crime report has been forwarded to the Central Criminal Police, and it emphasizes the necessity of continuing the discussion within the special committee. It also demonstrates readiness for more global, parliamentary ties and institutional cooperation.
2025-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
Mentions the positions of his colleague, Jürgen Ligi, but does not show a clear desire to achieve broad cooperation with coalition partners. Focuses more on control and accountability than on broad-based cooperation; an open approach to parliamentary debate, albeit with a critical undertone.
2025-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, press briefing
Seeking a critical cooperative relationship, but primarily oriented towards control and accountability. He/She invites the minister to a session and online platforms for discussion, but simultaneously indicates that cooperation with the coalition is limited, and that cooperation requires increased transparency and oversight. He/She demonstrates a readiness to utilize a special committee and parliamentary oversight to resolve the issues.
2025-09-08
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
Insufficient data
2025-09-04
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
Emphasis is often placed on cooperation and inclusion with the coalition, including the desire to organize joint sessions with the Legal Oversight and Constitutional Committees; there is a readiness to find compromises, but at the same time, the necessity of considering the opposition's viewpoints and legal limits is stressed. They speak of the wish to incorporate proposals from various opposition factions and, where necessary, facilitate cross-committee discussions.
2025-06-19
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
This clearly demonstrates a willingness to cooperate: It recognizes the coalition's readiness to work together and hopes that similar cooperation will continue regarding future bills submitted by the Centre Party. It recommends organizing an extraordinary committee session and contacting the Chairman of the Finance Committee to find a solution at a broad-based level.
2025-06-18
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
A certain willingness to cooperate is demonstrated (for example, the Center Party faction's proposal to reject the bill during its first reading), yet the coalition's method of processing procedural blocks and amendments is simultaneously criticized. Cooperation has been limited, and while the necessity for broad-based discussion and compromise is emphasized, the actions often symbolize confrontation.
2025-06-17
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
It indicates a certain willingness to cooperate, mentioning colleagues who have taken steps to raise questions, and shows readiness to suspend the experimental draft bill. It refers to the possibility of cooperation and the importance of cross-party discussions; it documents the readiness to involve other factions in collaborative efforts.
2025-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The speaker mentions cooperation with the Center Party faction, referencing meetings with the Chancellor of Justice and committee debates. However, deep involvement in cooperative efforts to adopt new bills is not permitted, resulting in an awkward process, and it is stressed that trade unions were unable to be included. He/She indicates a readiness to submit the Center Party’s amendments, emphasizing that they must avoid being unconstitutional. The overall tone expresses a willingness to cooperate, yet remains critical, prioritizing the communication of their own faction’s viewpoints.
2025-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing.
Not enough data
2025-06-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.
There is insufficient data regarding the modes of cooperation; the impression is that a question concerning clarification and legitimacy was raised first, rather than an active form of coalition.
2025-06-09
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
It demonstrates a readiness for broader cooperation, particularly in the area of social policy (such as free kindergartens) and in expanding state aid to local municipalities. It seeks to achieve consensus and emphasizes that all measures must be coordinated at the national level. While critical of specific partners and past policy experience, it does not rule out future collaboration.
2025-06-04
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Readiness for cooperation and compromise is expressed: emphasis is placed on joint action by the coalition and the opposition, and on making necessary clarifications during the second reading; reference is also made to the consensual support within the Tallinn City Council and the desire for national and local level solutions to advance in tandem.
2025-06-04
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing
Not enough data
2025-06-03
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fifth session, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2025-06-02
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session
The speaker remains open to cooperation concerning the adoption and deliberation of legislation, noting that the Riigikogu has passed a specific provision. He encourages the implementation of this provision and the establishment of a precedent. Although specific nationwide cooperation or collaboration with the special opposition is not mentioned, he refers to a call for discussion and synergy within the Riigikogu regarding the interpretation of these stipulations. He demonstrates a readiness to take legal measures and test them collectively.
2025-05-21
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing.
It involves the actions of the Centre Party and parliamentary cooperation: it points out that the Centre Party has already filed complaints with the administrative court, and the Riigikogu has supported the position. It demonstrates a readiness to cooperate at the level of the Riigikogu and ministries in order to achieve an amendment or a repeal.
2025-05-20
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Not enough data
2025-05-19
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
Emphasizes cooperation and dialogue; is prepared to negotiate and find solutions collaboratively, including balancing interests on behalf of small-scale farmers.
2025-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
It does not refer to specific forms of cooperation or coalitions; it demonstrates a readiness for cooperation and requests information and clarification from the ministry. It rules out a direct cooperation plan, but emphasizes the necessity of a common basis for discussion.
2025-05-14
15th Riigikogu, fifth sitting, information briefing.
Locally, it demonstrates a readiness to cooperate with the Latvian partner and stresses the necessity of ensuring improved collaboration and synchronizing timelines. Furthermore, there is a call to avoid divisive rhetoric and instead focus on constructive dialogue. This suggests a constructive, yet cautious approach to cooperation and dialogue.
2025-05-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
Insufficient data
2025-05-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.
The text indicates a willingness for cooperation and dialogue: they wish to "discuss things jointly" and deliberate on the creation of a new law, as well as find solutions in collaboration with the government and the Riigikogu (Parliament). However, they are simultaneously prepared to strongly assert their positions and demand answers.
2025-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Seeks broad-based consensus and cooperation with colleagues across the various levels of the legislative body; refers to the anti-corruption commission and the need to deliver mutually anticipated results; and demonstrates a readiness to utilize the provision both to establish a precedent and to gather widespread support.
2025-05-07
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Expresses readiness for cooperation and dialogue (a public hearing concerning Porto Franco, to which all members of the Centre Party and various other parties are invited to participate); primarily, the parameters for cooperation involve the review of specific issues, although the overall tone remains critical and oppositional.
2025-05-07
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing
It proposes a plan to hold a public session involving all political parties and to invite former members, thereby demonstrating a willingness for multilateral scrutiny and transparent handling of the matter; however, it tolerates intense criticism while striving to maintain strong parliamentary control.
2025-05-06
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Not enough data
2025-05-05
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Quite critical, yet it demonstrates a readiness for dialogue: it seeks cooperation within the special anti-corruption committee and appeals to other factions to share information. It stresses the need for thorough discussion and inclusion, but simultaneously draws attention to the bill's procedure and potential compromises involving at least some of the amendments. It refers to non-monetary decisions and the responsibility resting with colleagues.
2025-04-23
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Constructive and geared toward cooperation; seeks common solutions with the coalition and the opposition, and emphasizes the importance of compromise.
2025-04-23
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing
The text demonstrates a willingness to compromise and consider the positions of various political parties. This raises the question of whether subsequent steps and legislative drafts will garner wider support (for instance, regarding the 9% VAT reduction). While there is discussion about cooperation and inclusion, no specific extensive coalition collaboration is detailed.
2025-04-21
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Not enough data.
2025-04-17
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
Indicates a willingness to cooperate on certain specific issues, such as the reduction of VAT on local products; expresses a desire to listen and gather other ideas, and to foster a bipartisan or non-aligned discussion, while simultaneously maintaining a critical stance toward some of the coalition’s decisions.
2025-04-15
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
Not enough data
2025-04-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Insufficient data.
2025-04-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
It demonstrates cooperation with the Centre Party (“with the support of the Centre Party”) and has initiated a corresponding appeal. The text refers to a common position and case-specific action, but remains open to legal, if not political, cooperation. Furthermore, the ability to cooperate is presented in the context of circumventing the car tax.
2025-04-09
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
Cooperation is emphasized not only with the opposition but also with stakeholders: legislative drafts and amendments have been prepared collaboratively, specifically "together with the Association of Large Families and the Chamber of Disabled People." The necessity of dialogue with coalition partners is mentioned, as well as the need, if required, for a broader societal dialogue and even taking issues all the way to the Supreme Court. Readiness is demonstrated for cooperation and the involvement of multiple parties in order to improve tax policy.
2025-04-09
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing
There is a strong lack of evidence of cooperation; the speaker emphasizes Parliament's right to receive information and a willingness to meet with supervisory bodies and commissions, but specific bipartisan cooperation mechanisms or joint agreements have not been presented. This creates the impression of an approach focused less on collaboration and more on oversight and transparency.
2025-04-08
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The text indicates a readiness to discuss and engage, but it does not mention specific forms of cooperation or joint proposals; instead, it focuses on advancing dialogue through questions.
2025-03-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
There is insufficient information regarding the style of cooperation; the speech focuses on criticism and issues of coalition stability without describing specific collaborative mechanisms.
2025-03-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing
Although the texts reference the coalition agreement and prior approval, the tone is critical, and future cooperation will become crucial for engaging stakeholders and reviewing the changes. The first speech emphasizes honest discussion and accountability, while the second highlights the necessity of considering the interests of people with disabilities and families with children. Attention is also drawn to the fact that the proposed amendments did not reach the main chamber for a vote. It appears there is potential for collaboration, but a complaining and controlling pattern is also being presented.
2025-03-19
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing.
There is a significant lack of capacity for cooperation and submission, characterized by a predominantly critical and control-inducing approach. The speaker employs rhetoric designed to increase control and accountability, rather than seeking collaboration; the questions are aimed at the responsibility of the minister and the government regarding issues of emphasized transparency.
2025-03-17
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The text emphasizes cooperation with stakeholders (such as associations for people with disabilities and large families) and Riigikogu (Parliamentary) support groups; it is noted that the coalition ignored these amendment proposals. The existing rhetoric expresses a desire for solutions through compromise and the involvement of parliament and the public; a willingness to seek compromises is demonstrated, but the critical and contradictory stance persists simultaneously.
2025-03-12
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session
It promotes cooperation with various special committees and hopes that answers will be forthcoming and that the collaboration will be effective; it points to cooperation problems and the need to improve the efficiency of the briefing session. At the same time, the criticism regarding non-attendance is clear and conditional upon the theme of cooperation.
2025-03-12
The 15th Riigikogu, fifth sitting, information briefing.
It demonstrates a readiness to cooperate, but requires special control and oversight, emphasizing the need for independent mechanisms; it has sought answers and called for clarity from the courts. Furthermore, it refers to cooperation with other institutions (the National Audit Office, the Ministry of Climate) and stresses the necessity of upholding legal certainty and transparency.
2025-03-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The strong cooperation style is not the fundamental approach—it primarily emphasizes issues of supervision and individual accountability and refers to the involvement of a special commission and the prosecutor's office. There is a noticeable lack of clear emphasis on broad-based bipartisan cooperation; control and the disclosure of materials are stressed more than joint action. A limited possibility for cooperation in the area of Procurement and Partnerships has been mentioned ("the parallel proposal for Lufthansa... was deemed unsuitable"); therefore, lines of cooperation do exist, but they operate within the context of critical oversight.
2025-02-27
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
It refers to the involvement of other opposition factions (e.g., the Centre Party, EKRE) and mentions like-minded individuals from the Reform Party as providing a critical contribution from colleagues; it demonstrates a readiness for broad-based discussion and, if necessary, cooperation associated with the initiation of criminal cases.
2025-02-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, press briefing
Not enough data
2025-02-25
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Not enough data
2025-02-19
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary sitting
Not enough data
2025-02-19
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th sitting, information briefing
They seek open cooperation and broader engagement with experts, scientists, and institutions (the National Audit Office, special committees, and anti-corruption organizations). The aim is to establish a public roundtable and democratic debate, and to reduce the proportion of decisions made behind closed doors.
2025-02-18
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
There is insufficient data regarding any cooperative or conciliatory efforts; the texts focus on criticism and procedural debate, with no clear indication of involvement from cooperation or coalition partners. The available data does not allow us to conclude that there is any readiness for cooperation.
2025-02-17
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
He points to previous cooperation with the Social Democrats and confirms his willingness to work together, but stresses that the amendment he introduced did not receive support from the coalition. He demonstrates readiness for cooperation, but acknowledges that the current opposition and the general lack of acceptance are impeding collaboration.
2025-02-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Not enough data
2025-02-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing
Limited readiness for cooperation; does not initiate broad cooperation efforts, focusing oppositionally on criticism and demanding concrete steps.
2025-02-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
No data available
2025-02-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
There is no clear, significant willingness to cooperate; the impression is that the leading platform or agenda values the ideas of other parties (e.g., the Reform Party's rhetoric on legal certainty and trust, the Centre Party's bank tax proposals), but there is no mention of a specific form of cooperation or concrete cooperation projects. The focus is primarily on respecting the opposition's separate viewpoint.
2025-01-28
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
A Proactive Inclusion Approach: recommends involving animal welfare advocates during the second reading and discussing these issues more broadly; demonstrating a willingness to cooperate with various stakeholders and implement potential changes.
2025-01-22
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing
The focus is on control and accountability, referencing colleagues' remarks (e.g., Lauri Laats) and utilizing collective platforms (such as information hours and committee sessions) to pose questions. It does not highlight strong direct contact or broad, compromise-oriented cooperation, but rather emphasizes deliberation and parliamentary oversight.
2025-01-16
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Inclusive and collaborative, it aims to make joint efforts with the coalition: it calls for debate and cooperation on amendments, emphasizing that the Riigikogu and the government must begin working together to achieve budget transparency. It anticipates that both parties may introduce better ideas during the second reading, and is prepared to incorporate feedback from the government and the Ministry of Finance.
2025-01-15
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Demonstrates readiness for cooperation: the importance of the agreement between the city government and the state is emphasized, support is sought from the Social Democrats, and the leading paragraph states that the project is not just for Tallinn, but broadly for Estonian healthcare and the economy. There is a vision for broader cooperation and flexibility (using the draft decision, rather than strictly adhering to old plans).
2025-01-15
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing
The speaker is critical, emphasizes control, and stresses the need for transparency. Cooperation is either absent or limited, yet the speaker calls for special committee meetings and parliamentary oversight. They do not demonstrate clear partisan cooperation, but rather seek transparency and control over the legislative process.
2025-01-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Actively seeking answers and discussion with ministers and representatives of the legal system, posing specific questions and requesting clarification (e.g., regarding the Ministry of Justice's position or the direction of court consolidation). Demonstrates a willingness to cooperate and engage in dialogue, rather than confrontation.
2024-12-17
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The possibility of cooperation indicates: a desire to merge drafts with the coalition and to take promises seriously; alongside criticism, it has been noted that cooperation is possible if the coalition adheres to its promises.
2024-12-12
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
Demonstrates a willingness to cooperate and a desire for dialogue (it is referenced that the other party has examined the transparency of board expense reimbursements); emphasizes the need to involve and discuss parliamentary financial matters with relevant colleagues.
2024-12-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
Although the tone is mainly critical, a certain degree of formal willingness to cooperate is discernible: it refers to the role of committees and negotiations as procedural safeguards (e.g., highlighting that a committee member could address speeches and find answers). However, the main style is oppositional, and when expressing a willingness to cooperate, it demonstrates less flexibility than pragmatic cooperation. It affirms that the transparency of decisions and the presentation of separate laws are necessary.
2024-12-11
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth session, press briefing.
The approach is primarily critical and questioning; collaboration is shown rather as limited than actively sought. It raises questions and disagreements, but doesn’t reveal specific intentions for broad-based bi- or multiparty cooperation; the emphasis is on observation and questioning the answer.
2024-12-10
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
Data unavailable.
2024-12-04
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
There is no explicitly stated intention of cooperation or bipartisanship; it refers to the commission and previous agenda items and poses questions, indicating participation in the discussion, but there is no clear mention of coalition cooperation or the involvement of opposing viewpoints.
2024-12-04
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, press briefing
Not enough data.
2024-12-02
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
Not enough data.
2024-11-20
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
All parliamentarians are called upon to accept a joint vote, and emphasis is placed on cooperation with the opposition against the coalition, but concrete multi-party entanglements remain primarily contextual. It demonstrates a clear area of factional cooperation, but focuses on its own faction's position and the promotion of its interests.
2024-11-20
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, press briefing.
Not enough data.
2024-11-18
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth Session, Plenary Session
Expresses a willingness for discussion and cooperation, but does not refer to a coalition; posing questions to the listener indicates a desire to find consensus.
2024-11-13
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.
It demonstrates a willingness to involve stakeholders and experts in committee discussions (e.g., written feedback from stakeholder groups and the inclusion of various experts), but at the same time emphasizes the need for parliamentary oversight and the coordination of conflicting, ongoing changes within the coalition. The collaboration aims to increase budget transparency, but does not envision extensive, bipolar cooperation with the coalition.
2024-11-07
15th Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
The central approach is bipartisanship and moving forward jointly through the establishment of a special investigative commission. Emphasis is placed on the need to involve all factions and collectively find balanced solutions between the coalition and the opposition. This recommended cooperation is underscored by the requirement that the use of public funds must be targeted and purposeful, and the composition of the team is essential.
2024-11-06
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
Demonstrates readiness for cooperation with the Riigikogu and ministries, emphasizing the need for discussion and the submission of amendment proposals; wishes to involve the coalition and the Ministry of Finance through open discussion and to supplement the basis for individual support; while maintaining a firm, critical position.
2024-11-06
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, information briefing
In cooperation, it demonstrates a willingness to increase control and auditing, but fails to clearly highlight a unified coalition of coordinated efforts; it emphasizes the necessity for the Ministry and RMK to ensure transparency and, if required, conduct an independent audit in collaboration with parliamentary mechanisms.
2024-11-05
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2024-11-04
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The cooperation dynamic, observed via contact and information requests, indicates that questions are posed to the minister and explanations are demanded, but the primary motivation for a direct coalition or cooperation platform is perceived to be the desire for control and information, rather than broad-based collaboration. The overall style is question-driven and fact-based, not coalition-centric.
2024-10-23
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
There is insufficient data regarding cooperation and coalitions; the information presented focuses on a single interaction with ministers and the submission of questions, without any reference to joint work or coalition initiatives.
2024-10-23
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, information briefing
There is an acknowledgment of the need to seek consensus and maintain continuous parliamentary dialogue, but warnings and criticisms are simultaneously and clearly articulated. Cooperation will continue within the limits of the coalition agreement, but the role and transparency of the Riigikogu are emphasized during the handling of draft legislation. Although their own bill has been presented, the text demonstrates a willingness to participate in parliamentary debates and the legislative process, while simultaneously demanding strict oversight.
2024-10-22
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
Not enough data
2024-10-21
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
It demonstrates a readiness to cooperate with local authorities (including joint meetings with the Association of Estonian Cities and Municipalities) and emphasizes the necessity of resolving funding issues through this collaboration. It champions the idea that local governments and the state must find common ground, asserting that cooperation is essential for the successful implementation of the care reform and the effective addressing of social matters.
2024-10-16
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
He is seeking cooperation with the coalition, mentioning the need for "cooperation between the coalition and the opposition," and wants the bill he submitted to be quickly taken up for debate; at the same time, he clearly emphasizes that the solution must be constitutional and transparent.
2024-10-16
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, press briefing
Insufficient data.
2024-10-15
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
Refers to colleague Lauri Laats and shared criticism, demonstrating cooperation within their faction. Using a collaborative format, the same concern is raised among other opposition members; however, it does not clearly indicate broader, state-level, coalition-friendly approaches.
2024-10-14
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
There is no clear evidence of a broad cooperative approach between the coalition and other factions. The emphasis lies primarily on the faction's opposition vote and resistance to both the constitutionality of the draft bill and any corrective amendments. Regarding coalition cooperation, no significant examples of collaborative forms are presented; instead, the rhetoric is critical and focused on highlighting disagreements.
2024-10-09
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, information briefing
It demonstrates a time-sensitive approach and a desire for cooperation via the accountability and information hours (evidenced by the reiteration of invitations sent and the promotion of guest participation). Nevertheless, concrete cooperation or coalition measures are absent; the focus remains primarily on questions and critical oversight. There is no direct mention of services or mechanisms for coalition or bipartisan collaboration.
2024-10-07
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
Demonstrates readiness for cooperation and engagement: refers to stakeholder proposals and expresses the desire for these to be reflected in the budget, emphasizes early risk prevention; mentions cooperation with the Special Anti-Corruption Committee and other parties.
2024-09-25
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
Stresses cooperation: points out that the Centre Party itself has previously introduced similar draft legislation and is seeking discussion with its coalition partners. It is looking for a government-wide solution and clarity regarding coalition support.
2024-09-25
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, press briefing
The text calls for cooperation between ministries and the securing of resources, while simultaneously demanding strict oversight and control over constitutional compliance. It demonstrates a readiness to cooperate, provided that this cooperation is accompanied by robust legal standards and accountability.
2024-09-24
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting
It emphasizes cooperation with OECD countries and requests that cooperation with these countries be maintained or expanded in the new draft bill. This involves supportive synergy within the context of an internationally scoped weapons laboratory.
2024-09-19
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
It primarily seeks independent and cooperative work behind its own draft bills and calls on parliament to vote them through. While it emphasizes criticism from the opposition towards the coalition and sometimes describes reciprocal cooperation as difficult, it proposes alternative financing methods (e.g., digital tax). In cases of uncertainty, it may indicate a desire for broad-based cooperation, but the primary position is to promote its own draft bills and take action to secure their adoption.
2024-09-18
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, press briefing
The willingness to cooperate sometimes shines through in the coalition's participation, especially regarding the hospital project, where they call for the coalition's support and wish to find common solutions. At the same time, they are critical of the relationship and demand a response from coalition partners and ministers; they show readiness to cooperate on sectoral reforms.
2024-09-17
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
He/She has experience cooperating with stakeholders (such as involving chambers and associations for people with disabilities) and notes that some amendment proposals were drafted in collaboration with those groups; however, he/she points out that these collaboratively developed proposals could not be brought up for discussion. In the call, he/she stresses the necessity of continuing cooperation, but does not exclude criticism concerning the absence of compromises.
2024-09-16
The 15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting.
Not enough data.
2024-07-15
15th Riigikogu, Extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
Cooperation with interest groups and various stakeholders has been emphasized: collaboration was undertaken with interest groups in preparing key amendment proposals; however, the firm stance of the opposition indicates that cooperation requires stronger guarantees and assurances of constitutionality; a consistent, yet critical approach to the coalition.
2024-06-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, additional plenary session
Although critical, he/she has demonstrated a willingness to cooperate: pointing to the actions of opposition partners (the Social Democrats' support for the supplementary budget during the second and third readings) and attempting to use interpellations and parliamentary mechanisms to criticize the government. He/She acknowledges a certain element of coalition partnership, but maintains selective and sporadic criticism of the coalition, alongside presenting alternative solutions.
2024-06-12
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.
The strategy involves elements of both demands and cooperation: he confirms that the Centre Party submitted many substantive amendments, and some of these changes were accepted. At the same time, he stresses his willingness to cooperate going forward and advance their positions through the “second bill.” It seems he wants to find a broad-based solution and involve the coalition, but simultaneously continues to criticize the coalition's actions.
2024-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
Cooperation among state institutions is noted as standard practice, but there are no specific descriptions regarding the methods of cooperation employed by either the coalition or the opposition; inter-institutional cooperation is emphasized as the norm.
2024-06-10
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Insufficient data
2024-06-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
It shows some willingness to cooperate (e.g., noting that compromises could be reached regarding speeding violations) and refers to the necessity of cooperation concerning coalition bills. However, it also notes that the Centre Party's proposed amendments did not receive support, and the coalition does not appear ready for broader adjustment. References to "cooperation" and "attempts to defend" were used in the committee, but in practice, cooperation was successful only to a limited extent.
2024-06-03
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary sitting.
The tone is critical, yet it stresses the need for transparency and accountability, specifically referencing the coalition partners. However, cooperation or compromise is primarily framed through the demanding of questions and the receipt of answers; it poses questions rather than offering direct bipartisan decisions.
2024-05-29
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Addresses the coalition, submits amendments, and calls for the party's inclusion; shows a willingness to compromise, but stresses the need for his proposals and impact analysis to be prioritized.
2024-05-29
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, information briefing
Insufficient data
2024-05-28
15th Riigikogu, third session, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2024-05-27
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary session
Not enough data
2024-05-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The willingness to cooperate with the coalition does not appear to have been emphasized; the speech focuses instead on the opposition and criticism of the coalition's plans. No geographical or significant readiness for compromise was highlighted, although the concerns of various interest groups and discussion activities were mentioned, suggesting a broader debate but not a concrete foundation for cooperation.
2024-05-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, press briefing
References directed toward cooperation are missing or limited; it highlights coalition disagreements (for example, regarding the abolition of the tax bump) and does not show active readiness for broad-based cooperation. It focuses on control and criticism, rather than offering constructive solutions.
2024-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2024-05-13
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The text demonstrates a readiness for dialogue with institutions (the ombudsman, the minister) and discusses current issues, but it contains no direct mention of specific cooperation formats or coalitions. The approach, focused on meetings and discussions, suggests a constructive willingness to cooperate, though cooperation with partners and coalitions is not detailed separately.
2024-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session.
Collegiate cooperation is evident only to a limited extent: speakers accuse the commission of following government guidelines and claim that stakeholder hearings do not influence the final outcome. Some materials express the need to improve parliamentary cooperation (e.g., the possibility of separate votes, raising objections, etc.), but overall, the tone is forceful and less conducive to cooperation. It has been noted that there is a desire to involve the opposition in reviews and votes, but there is no significant, discernible trend of bipartisanship or broad-based cooperation.
2024-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
Not enough data
2024-05-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Primarily an oppositional stance, showing few signs of broad cooperation; it stresses visible resistance to the coalition's measures and draws examples from the context of debate and counter-moves; it references the need for discussions, but ultimately focuses on defiance.
2024-05-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
It emphasizes cooperation with the parties involved and the importance of dialogue (cooperation with various parties, reviewing the statutes/bylaws with the committee chairman). At the same time, it allows for critical dialogue and demands answers, which suggests an approach that is cooperation-based yet focused on results.
2024-05-02
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Supports cooperation and dialogue: invites representatives of parliamentary groups, religious organizations, and the church to a meeting, and emphasizes that solutions to problems must be found collaboratively, rather than simply being treated as a PR exercise. Demonstrates readiness for compromise and broad-based discussion.
2024-04-30
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session.
Coordinated opposition at the party level emphasizes the unity and joint proposal of the Centre Party faction. The direct reference to the "Centre Party faction rejection proposal" indicates a structured opposition approach; there are no signs of extensive social or non-public cooperation with other parties.
2024-04-29
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Emphasis on Inclusion and Cooperation: [They] have drafted amendments together with stakeholders and refer to the coalition's current state of affairs; the Centre Party faction's more than 300 substantive amendments are mentioned; [they] are ready to continue cooperation with other factions and committees, while simultaneously remaining critical of the coalition.
2024-04-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The party/group is not showing a strong readiness for cooperation with the coalition. It stresses the necessity of avoiding the bundling of substantive amendments and the acceptance of limitations on recesses. While it does mention the possibility of involving the Council of Elders in discussions, suggesting some potential for dialogue, the main emphasis remains on protecting the rights and procedures of the opposition. This diplomatic but critical stance on cooperation primarily addresses the procedural aspects of the law.
2024-04-16
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
There is insufficient information regarding cooperation or potential collaboration opportunities.
2024-04-15
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary session
Emphasizes cooperation with the Ministry and the necessity of coordination; demonstrates willingness for dialogue and partnership.
2024-04-10
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The speaker demonstrates some capacity for cooperation within the opposition, specifically naming the center faction in the context of rejecting the submitted proposal during the first reading. The address highlights the necessity of reaching a general consensus but fails to show any willingness for broader compromise regarding the substance of the draft bill. It stresses shared values in law enforcement and economic protection.
2024-04-10
15th Estonian Parliament, third sitting, information briefing
There is not enough data.
2024-04-09
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
A factional approach; represents the position of the party and the faction, but does not clearly demonstrate readiness for broader cooperation or compromise; the emphasis is on their own position.
2024-04-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
Collaborative efforts are being used: amendments are proposed and defended in the Finance Committee; however, the broad coalition is criticized, and they appear jointly in a multi-party context. [This] demonstrates a readiness to participate in discussions, but maintains a central oppositional stance regarding the outcomes. It does not strongly highlight broad bipolarity, but emphasizes the parliamentary mechanism for making improvements through engagement.
2024-04-03
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
It refers to the coalition's internal discussion, but there is no clear indication of readiness for cooperation or compromise. The speaker focuses on emphasizing responsibility and control, rather than constructive partnership; a decline in cooperation is evident against the backdrop of the discussion.
2024-04-03
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
It utilizes the submission of its own legislative drafts and the offering of alternative solutions as a means of cooperation, but it does not demonstrate extensive, close, or high-impact collaboration with other factions. It shows a willingness to cooperate through bills and debates.
2024-04-02
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
The cooperation strategy indicates greater support for the internal faction (with legal analysis conducted internally) instead of establishing a broad coalition with other parties. It mentions approaching the president for external cooperation but fails to emphasize a wider umbrella coalition or reciprocal compromises with other parties.
2024-04-01
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The criticism carries a negative tone, yet it indicates some willingness to utilize alternative taxes (such as a digital tax or an excess profit tax on banks) and to cooperate on relevant issues via parliamentary inquiries. There is no emphasis on broad coalition compromise, but rather a demonstrable readiness to propose solutions and demand answers.
2024-03-20
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, press briefing.
The speaker refers to various amendment proposals that outline special provisions and funding, and demonstrates a willingness to compromise. However, broader cooperation with other factions has not been clearly indicated.
2024-03-19
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Not enough data
2024-03-18
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Focused on cooperation, it thanks the Minister for the collaboration and emphasizes that a unified registry solution is the best path forward. It seeks broader consensus and is open to further dialogue and cooperation with the government.
2024-03-13
15th Estonian Parliament, third sitting, information briefing
No direct coalition cooperation or coalition-based programmatic approach is evident; the individual emphasizes criticism of competitors and the government in parliamentary work and refers to the positions of other experts. At the same time, he/she demonstrates a willingness to listen, acknowledges the leadership and colleagues, and utilizes references to expert opinions. Within the cooperative context, the individual remains primarily an independent critic, rather than a coalition partner.
2024-03-11
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
Utilizes collaborative methods: submits various amendments to the Finance Committee, emphasizes the need for substantive discussion, and highlights the presentation of proposals submitted by the coalition. Furthermore, they call for expanded cooperation and are organizing a broader movement (a demonstration) in response to the car tax.
2024-03-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, press briefing
The opposition stresses that it has put forward its own amendments and alternatives (such as the excess profit tax). A clear desire for compromise and open debate is not a prominent feature of the context; instead, the emphasis is placed on opposition and the presentation of alternatives. Cooperation between colleagues and parties is mentioned (for instance, the Centre Party as the originator of other amendments), but no specific commitment to broad-based cooperation is demonstrated.
2024-03-04
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The style of cooperation appears critical and demanding, yet it necessitates discussion and compromise (interpellations to the minister; potential amendment proposals). The general tone points to the need for widespread support and mentions an expanded national charter based on ethical principles, but direct scalpel cooperation with other factions is limited.
2024-02-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Demonstrates a willingness to consider alternatives and discuss underlying motivations ("perhaps your idea..."), while remaining critical and calling for clarity; points to opportunities for collaboration, but does not specify the exact nature of cooperation among partnership teams.
2024-02-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
It demonstrates a certain willingness to cooperate, backing the previous speaker and participating in discussions procedurally; however, the focus remains on criticism and concrete alternatives. Although critical, it does not preclude the possibility of dialogue and stresses the need to keep the topics relevant.
2024-02-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting.
Emphasis is placed on the need for broad-based consensus and cooperation, with cross-party agreement cited as the desired level. [The subject] is prepared to discuss and seek compromises, but stands firmly behind the fundamental goals (funding and Estonian-language instruction).
2024-02-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
Not enough information. (The principles of cooperation or cuts have not been clearly described, using the example of parliamentary or opposition colleagueship/membership.)
2024-02-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
It emphasizes the necessity of dialogue with stakeholders and collaboration when analyzing the impact of regional decisions; it also points to the need for mitigation measures from the Ministry of Regional Affairs and potential cooperation opportunities with stakeholders. It calls for constructive, rather than indifferent, cooperation.
2024-01-24
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
An approach oriented towards inclusion and transparency; it emphasizes the involvement of citizens and experts, and requires that draft legislation only be approved after the preparation of the intent to draft and an impact assessment. It supports cooperation between ministries and the Riigikogu (Parliament) through stricter oversight and discussions. It demands that stronger procedures and analyses be established to ensure mutual consideration.
2024-01-24
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The capacity for cooperation is limited; consisting mainly of criticism and questions directed at the government. The Reform Party's proposed amendment is cited as an example of other inter-party discussions, but there is no clear willingness shown for broad-based cooperation or compromise. Regarding defense matters, the need to act jointly is stressed, but the overall tone of cooperation remains typically constrained and critical.
2024-01-23
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Most clearly, it focuses on the necessity of cross-party agreements and partnerships with the private sector and research institutions. It highlights the need for cooperation and the creation of joint platforms, and is prepared to continue or restore previous initiatives (e.g., the Sutrop bill) at the legislative level. It expects and actively promotes cooperation among various stakeholders.
2024-01-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Emphasizes cooperation and a cross-party approach; expresses readiness to find the best determination and secure the coalition's support; demonstrates a clear desire for compromise and collaboration.
2024-01-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
Seeks cooperation between various parties and local governments; calls upon the Minister of Education for assistance, and emphasizes the importance of reaching an agreement within the coalition.
2024-01-16
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
It does not point to specific forms of cooperation or cooperation partners; it primarily uses cooperation methods: listening and discussion, but there are no clear signs of shared intentions or coalition forms of cooperation. It poses questions as a means for discussion. Not enough data on examples of closer cooperation.
2024-01-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
Willingness to cooperate is not clearly emphasized; the focus is rather on clarity and control, not broad collaboration or unified positions. What is present is a critical and solitary discussion, not active bipartisanship.
2024-01-11
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
It emphasizes inter-ministerial cooperation and discussion regarding the wording, demonstrating a readiness for compromise and future collaboration. It indicates that officials are discussing a common solution and are reaching an agreement more slowly due to the difficulties involved.
2024-01-10
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Cooperative: seeks information and clarification from the minister, and demonstrates a willingness for dialogue and collaboration toward the reform.
2024-01-10
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The scope for cooperation is considerable, but the focus remains on obtaining concrete data, examples, and specific answers from the government and the regional minister. This represents a demanding yet constructive attitude, requesting examples of proposals and investments within the budget. While not directly coalition-aligned, there is a readiness to cooperate, provided that clear and measurable improvement proposals are presented.
2024-01-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
Cooperation and dialogue are the core principles: [The speaker/group] calls for a joint discussion forum between the ministry and local governments and seeks concerted action toward establishing central funding. It is ready for compromise, but ties cooperation directly to increasing state responsibility and funding in the education sector.