By Plenary Sessions: Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart

The primary focus is on amendments to the Hunting Act and the expansion of regulations concerning game hunting. The stance is measuredly supportive and requires broad discussion and engagement, rather than strict opposition. Strong opposition is not being voiced; the emphasis is on advancing the process and introducing potential changes during the second reading. This approach is policy-driven and centers on the necessity of expanding the regulatory scope of the specific draft bill.

The main political direction is the raising of accountability for state aid decisions and governance. It partially confirms a negative stance regarding the emergency financing of Nordica and the lack of supervision over KredEx disbursements, emphasizing the need for transparency and compliance with legal acts. A strong, critical position is aimed at demanding accountability in line with the constitutional framework and protecting the autonomy and legality of the State Secretary.

An opposition figure and sector representative who champions budget transparency and due legal process. They advocate for balanced democratic oversight and stress that decisions concerning finance and budgetary matters must not be delegated to the executive branch. While ready for cooperation, they maintain strong opposition to the coalition's current approach. Their core priority is improving the structure and transparency of the budget and amending the legislation itself, rather than relying solely on temporary fixes.

The main characteristic is the strong support for the Tallinn Hospital project, which is viewed as a key driver for advancing the nation's healthcare and economy. The position is firmly supportive (strong), emphasizing the necessity of state co-financing and a shared contribution with Tallinn. Criticism regarding the Reform Party's activities in 2022 is being addressed, and efforts are underway to seek broad-based, coalition-driven cooperation (particularly with the support of the Social Democrats). The established narrative is policy- and performance-based, focusing on the project's wider benefits for both healthcare and the economy.

Kuiheidu is highly critical of the government's anti-corruption efforts and transparency issues, stressing the need to restore credibility and address conflicts of interest. He takes a strong oppositional stance, accusing the government of withholding information and making hasty, untrustworthy decisions. His framing is centered more on values and the defense of legal certainty than on pragmatic collaboration.

Regarding the state-owned company Eesti Energia, he stresses that the owner's expectations must be balanced against the interests of the populace and ensure a reasonable electricity price, rather than focusing solely on dividends, security of supply, or investments. He is critical of the fact that the owner's expectations are not reflected in written form and questions why this objective has not been documented to date. He condemns the cuts made in the judicial and other sectors without a thorough impact analysis, and emphasizes the necessity of evaluating the impact on the entire system.