By Plenary Sessions: Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart

The main focus is on amendments to the Hunting Act; discussion between the first and second readings, and the possibility of introducing amendments; specific aspects were mentioned (trophy hunting, bird hunting, daily limit) and the need to involve interest groups and discuss the matter more broadly.

It emphasizes the importance of constitutional and legal foundations and the autonomy of the State Secretary. It focuses on issues concerning the competence of state institutions and the constitutional compliance of signatures, referencing commentaries on the constitution and questions that have arisen in light of today's changes. The primary objective is to clarify the interaction between the roles of the Chancellor of Justice and the State Secretary and legislation, and to enhance oversight.

The primary objective is to amend the basic budget law and legally establish a separate breakdown of expenditures and revenues. It requires that the legal framework be auditable and transparent, and that amendments be permissible during the first and second readings. He/She emphasizes the necessity of cooperation, involving sources of criticism, finalizing the measures for the 2026 budget, and implementing metrics and stricter oversight.

The legislative priority is the passing of the draft resolution concerning the funding of the Tallinn Hospital in the Riigikogu; emphasis is placed on flexibility and opportunities for cooperation, rather than strict adherence to all decisions laid out in the old plan; it is stressed that the outcome of the vote depends on cooperation between the opposition and the coalition, as well as the continuation of the project within the scope of the budget law.

Focuses on the nuances of the draft legislation, particularly the changes to the role of the Secretary of State and the modification of the requirement for a higher legal education. It criticizes the haste and the uneven approach, emphasizing the need to ensure an independent and critical civil service. It also mentions that the Climate Law and other important legal acts have been addressed from the government's perspective, and there is a need to monitor the connections related to the adoption of these drafts beyond current oversight. It anticipates greater public scrutiny and transparency regarding the constitutional compliance of the laws.

The core areas include the regulation of the energy sector and state property management, along with discussions concerning judicial system reform. It refers to the possibility of court mergers and seeks the positions of the Ministry of Justice. Furthermore, it highlights the necessity of conducting a comprehensive impact analysis before final decisions are made, and indicates that parliament is engaged in the discussions regarding the balancing of both proprietary and public interests.