By Plenary Sessions: Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart

A constructive and collaborative tone; uses polite, open language and questions to engage colleagues and consider a second reading and the inclusion of the parties' opinions.

The discourse is primarily critical and fact-based, employing numerous specific questions and hypothetical scenarios. The tone is formally deliberative, yet simultaneously somewhat charged with an accusatory and demanding quality. It utilizes clear logic and contextual references to elucidate constitutional nuances.

The tone is critical yet constructive and fact-based. It employs emotional appeals and pointed examples (such as the shifting figures related to Rail Baltic), while simultaneously stressing the need for dialogue aimed at collective discussion. There is a palpable expectation of transparency, and it uses metaphors, like the rolling snowball, to symbolize and highlight the persistent dynamics of the issue. The approach successfully balances strong argumentation with a rhetoric dedicated to championing democratic processes.

A highly emotional yet fact-based argumentative style: criticism of the Reform Party's activities and personal accusations of political undermining, while simultaneously emphasizing a readiness for cooperation and broad-based benefit. Both symbolic claims and concrete data are utilized, which in various sections lend support to the speech, yet a strong, confident, and moderate rhetoric is maintained. The text contains a balanced combination of both praise and criticism and focuses on projects and motivations.

The tone is occasionally focused on consequence and urgency, highly combative, and question-driven. It employs concrete examples and harsh accusations ("How is this possible?" "You are lying"). The address is fact-based, but emotionally impactful and carries a divisive tone.

The focus is on an analytical, interrogative tone. It employs concrete examples (the Eesti Energia special committee, the closure of the Jõhvi courthouse, Villu Kõve) and poses questions designed to stimulate debate. The text is formal and comprehensive in structure, combining factual references with critical assessment.