By Agendas: Mario Kadastik

Total Agendas: 61

Fully Profiled: 61

All Categories Political Position Topic Expertise Rhetorical Style Activity Patterns Opposition Stance Collaboration Style Regional Focus Economic Views Social Issues Legislative Focus
2025-10-15
First Reading of the Draft Act amending the Protection of Ambient Air Act and other Acts (Transposition of Amendments to the Renewable Energy Directive) (697 SE)

The 15th Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting

No direct opposition or criticism is expressed; instead, differences of opinion and opposing viewpoints are reported neutrally. For instance, it is mentioned that Estonia’s position regarding the cancellation of ETS2 did not garner significant support within the EU, and that two members voted against concluding the first reading of the draft bill.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-10-14
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Public Transport Act (725 SE)

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The opposition was directed at the minister’s original proposal to remove the photo from the employee ID card for the sake of efficiency. The criticism was policy-based and moderate, focusing on the necessity of ensuring security. The confrontation was resolved with a compromise, under which the minister promised to investigate the cost of the technical solution proposed by the commission.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-10-09
Discussion of the Crucial National Issue 'The Future of the Estonian Economy'

15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

Insufficient information
View Profile View Agenda
2025-10-08
First reading of the Draft Decision of the Riigikogu (658 OE) "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic to Develop a Plan for Increasing Competition in the Mobile Communications Market and Accelerating Number Portability"

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The stance towards the opposition (the Centre Party) is neutral, merely noting that they did not want to withdraw their draft bill, even though the government is already addressing the issue. It reports on Marek Reinaas's question concerning the withdrawal of the bill, suggesting pressure from the coalition.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-24
Draft law amending the Motor Vehicle Insurance Act (649 SE) – First Reading

Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.

The opposition is directed against both the initiators of the bill (including Isamaa) and the content of the bill itself, emphasizing its conflict with EU directives and its irrationality. The criticism is policy-based, also highlighting the Ministry of Finance’s opposition to the draft legislation. The proposal to reject the bill was passed in the committee with a clear majority (7 votes in favor, 3 against).
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-23
Draft Law Amending the Waste Act (676 SE) – First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 6th session, plenary session

Insufficient data.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-17
Draft law amending the Mandatory Traffic Insurance Act (Insurance of Light Electric Vehicle Users) – First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting.

The primary opposition is aimed at the bill’s supporters, who are criticized for offering a narrow and ineffective solution that fails to solve the actual problem. He/She also notes the Ministry of Finance’s opposition to the bill, arguing that it goes beyond the directive and may stifle innovation.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-11
Draft law amending the Holiday and Commemoration Day Act (636 SE) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session

The confrontation is directed at the claims presented by the bill's rapporteur, which are considered unreliable and "a bit strange." The criticism is policy-based, calling into question the validity of the report's economic analysis concerning energy and wages.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-04
Chair implementation

15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu

There is no direct criticism aimed at the opposition, but the speaker proactively addresses potential concerns (such as worries regarding the immediate construction of a nuclear power plant) in order to clarify the true scope of the proposal.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-18
Draft law amending the Planning Act and other laws (accelerating the adoption of renewable energy) (541 SE) – third reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

They oppose those who claim oil shale is cheap and competitive, labeling that assertion "inherently false." Criticism is also aimed at the current bureaucratic system, which allows procedures to be continuously dragged out through the submission of repetitive proposals.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-17
Draft law amending the Competition Act and, in consequence thereof, amending other laws (609 SE) – third reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session

The direct opponent is not criticized; rather, the criticism is aimed at the drawn-out and costly legislative process and previous indecisiveness. The critique is procedural and fiscal, stressing that paying the fines is irrational.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-12
Continuation of the second reading of the bill (541 SE) amending the Planning Act and other laws (accelerating the adoption of renewable energy).

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The confrontation is aimed at refuting the claims of specific opponents (Lauri, Mart, Anti), focusing on clarifying political and economic facts. The criticism is relevant and purposeful, seeking to demonstrate that the information presented by the opponents (e.g., regarding the purpose of subsidization or the scope of planning) is not quite as it was initially presented.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-10
Draft law amending the Competition Act and, in consequence, amending other laws (609 SE) - second reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.

No direct confrontation was voiced, but the speaker raises a critical and skeptical question regarding the adequacy of the solutions proposed in the government's bill. The criticism is aimed at ensuring policy standards and procedural correctness.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-05
Discussion of the significant national issue initiated by the Economics Committee: "How to increase productivity in the Estonian economy?"

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session.

Direct political opposition is neither criticized nor named. Criticism is instead aimed at general systemic problems (such as bureaucracy and access to capital) that the ruling coalition is attempting to address, and it is stressed that the challenges highlighted in the expert report were neither shocking nor surprising.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-21
Draft law amending the Liquid Fuels Act (622 SE) - First Reading

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.

The main opponent is Urmas Reinsalu, who is accused of systematic and deliberate lying and presenting half-truths from the parliamentary podium. The criticism is intense and personal, focusing on the opponent's unethical conduct and distortion of facts aimed at generating fear among the public. The opponent's rhetoric is referred to as "stupidities" and "nonsense."
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-14
Draft law amending the Electricity Market Act (556 SE) – third reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session

The confrontation targets specific colleagues (Rain, Aleksei, Aivar), criticizing their factual errors (the bill number, the state of the economy) and their exaggeration of the consequences of policy. Aleksei is criticized for claiming an "enormously large burden," a claim which is rebutted with specific expenditure figures. Aivar is corrected regarding both the duration of the economic downturn and the cost of Canadian nuclear reactors.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-07
Second reading of the draft law amending the Electricity Market Act (556 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The confrontation is sharp, aimed primarily at the EKRE and Isamaa factions and specific individuals (Reinsalu, Epler, Helme, Poolamets). The criticism targets both political proposals (such as the idea of a special environmental permit) and the mathematical and factual errors made by the opponents. The mention of Hando Sutter, the former head of Eesti Energia, is used to discredit the opponent's authority by referencing a criminal case.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-07
Draft law amending the Planning Act and other laws (accelerating the adoption of renewable energy) (541 SE) - second reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

Strong opposition to Urmas Reinsalu, accusing him of exaggerating the numbers (from 140 million to 200 million) and using unreliable sources (Hando Sutter). It criticizes EKRE and other opponents (Tšaplõgin, Helle-Moonika Helme) for spreading erroneous information, especially regarding the causes of the power outage in Spain. The criticism of the opponents is directed both at the substance of the policy and the methodological incorrectness of the arguments.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-04-24
Debate on the nationally significant issue "The Drawbacks of Wind Power," initiated by the faction of the Estonian Conservative People's Party.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The opposition (EKRE) is under heavy criticism because the debate they initiated was severely lacking, factually incorrect, and utilized misleading data (e.g., the map of bird restrictions). The opposition is especially sharply criticized for its "tremendous affinity for Russia," including lamenting the departure from the BRELL system and expressing a desire to use Russian nuclear technology, all while calling Russia a terrorist state.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-04-23
Second reading of the draft law amending the Electricity Market Act (555 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The confrontation is primarily aimed at the Isamaa faction (Urmas Reinsalu and Rain Epler), criticizing their political rhetoric as "total populism" and highlighting the baselessness of their numerical claims (e.g., a cost of 120 million euros). The criticism is also directed at Isamaa's contradictory behavior, as they are attempting to halt a bill designed to keep the oil shale energy sector viable. The opponents' arguments are being refuted using technical details and market forecasts.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-04-16
Draft law amending the Energy Sector Organisation Act (574 SE) – First Reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session

The main confrontation is with Mart Maastik and other supporters of Bill 574 SE, whose positions (e.g., the unrealistic nature of the 100% target, the cheapness of oil shale electricity) are considered erroneous or based on outdated data. The criticism is directed at the substance of the policy and the interpretation of facts; for example, the claim that the CO2 quota constitutes the majority of the oil shale market price is rejected.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-04-16
First reading of the draft resolution of the Riigikogu "Submission of a plan of action for the development of Estonia's electricity production capacities and electricity networks to the Riigikogu by the Government of the Republic, to ensure energy security" (575 OE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session

The main criticism is aimed at Isamaa representative Mart Maastik for deeming ENMAK’s price forecasts unrealistic and for setting an unrealistic deadline (May 1st) for draft bill 575 OE. Opponents who overlook the impact of the CO2 quota on energy prices are also indirectly criticized, as is another political party for excessive support of offshore wind, which was the reason for their departure from the coalition. The criticism is policy- and procedure-centric.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-04-15
Draft law amending the Public Transport Act (578 SE) - First Reading

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.

The opposition is aimed at those who are spreading misinformation regarding taxi regulation, stressing that their sources are unreliable. The criticism targets the selection of sources (e.g., "Forus taxi drivers") and the lack of knowledge concerning the legislation, advising them to read the regulation itself.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-04-09
The first reading of the draft resolution (569 OE) of the Riigikogu, "Proposal to the Government of the Republic to temporarily suspend the processing of all planning procedures related to wind farms, with a deferral until the establishment of an up-to-date methodology for infrasound measurements and the setting of limit values for sound pressure levels."

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session

Opponents are being criticized for attempting to "incite panic based on ignorance" and for presenting a bill that lacks scientific justification. The criticism is directed both at the content of the proposed legislation and the opponents' deficient understanding, drawing parallels to unseen and unfelt dangers (such as radiation or carbon monoxide). Furthermore, the nocebo effect is cited as the reason for the onset of symptoms.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-03-24
Draft law amending the Electricity Market Act (568 SE) - First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session.

The opposition is aimed at the initiators of the draft bill and those who promote oil shale energy as a cheap alternative, highlighting its actual high price (130–200 euros/MWh). He rejected the personal attack ("Putinist") as a vile accusation and ideologically countered those who rationally consider fossil fuels to be cheaper. He also criticizes the claims that billions have been budgeted for onshore wind subsidies.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-03-11
The Prime Minister's address for 2025 on the implementation of the long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035" (including an overview of the situation of research and development activities and the government's policy in this area).

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The criticism is aimed at the government's science policy and the recent reform of the Science Agency, which is accused of fragmenting funding and jeopardizing the foundational basis of basic sciences. The opposition is policy- and procedure-based, focusing specifically on the government's incorrect setting of priorities (the excessive emphasis on applied sciences).
View Profile View Agenda
2025-01-29
The Chancellor of Justice's proposal to align the Electricity Market Act with the Constitution.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The opposition is primarily procedural, directed at Mart Maastik's protest, who wanted the Chancellor of Justice’s proposal to be handled separately from Bill 555. No substantive opposition to the removal of the constitutional infringement was mentioned in the committee.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-01-22
Draft law amending the Electricity Market Act (556 SE) – first reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session.

There is no direct confrontation; the speaker is instead addressing the resulting confusion and questions (such as the Lasnamäe issue or Anti's question) by offering explanations and technical details. The criticism is aimed primarily at unreasonable regulatory restrictions (the 15 km limit), rather than specific parties.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-01-22
Draft law amending the Electricity Market Act (555 SE) - First Reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session.

There is no confrontation; the talk centers on summarizing the discussions and presenting the agreed-upon decisions.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-12-09
Draft law amending the Act on the Status of a Member of the Riigikogu (545 SE) - first reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting

The opposition is directed at the sponsors of the draft bill (545 SE), whose claimed savings are being called into question. The criticism is procedural and focuses on whether the reduction in expense allowances will actually lead to real savings or if the maintenance fund will suffer instead.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-21
Draft law amending the Competition Law (466 SE) – Second Reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

There is an absence of direct opponents or criticism. It is noted that no amendments were received from members of the Riigikogu, which indicates widespread tacit approval of the draft bill. Among interest groups, feedback was received only from the Chancellor of Justice, which likewise does not indicate opposition.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-21
Second reading of the bill amending the Income Tax Act and the Defence Service Act, and the bill amending the Income Tax Act (509 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The primary opponent is the Isamaa party, which is accused of creating the income tax kink (or hump) and opposing measures to support average wage earners. The criticism is intense and policy-based, alleging that Isamaa does not want rescuers and teachers to actually receive more money.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-10-14
Draft law amending the Competition Act (466 SE) - First Reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting

There is no direct opposition. The speaker emphasizes consensus decisions and voting results where there were no opposing votes (0 against), which indicates a smooth procedure within the committee.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-09-18
Second reading of the Draft Act (359 SE) on amendments to the Law on the Organization of the Energy Economy, the Electricity Market Act, and the Environmental Impact Assessment and Environmental Management System Act

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session

The opposition is primarily aimed at the EKRE faction and other Riigikogu members who submitted a large number of amendments and sought to delay the proceedings. Criticism is also leveled at the European Commission's vague wording, which enabled a "jokk-scheme"—a loophole the Commission itself later introduced an amendment to fix.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-06-12
Second Reading of the Riigikogu Resolution "Supporting the Introduction of Nuclear Energy in Estonia" (431 OE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.

The standoff centers on refuting the opposition's claims, particularly concerning immediate expenditures ("hundreds of millions of euros") and the lack of support from outside the development community. The criticism is fact-based and aimed at correcting inaccurate statements, rather than engaging in personal attacks.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-06-11
First reading of the Draft Act on Accession to the Convention establishing the European Organization for Nuclear Research, the associated Financial Protocol, and the Protocol on Privileges and Immunities (451 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.

Insufficient data
View Profile View Agenda
2024-06-06
Second Reading of the Draft Act on the Amendment of the Motor Insurance Act and Related Amendments to Other Acts (Bill 400 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The primary confrontation arose with the Center Party faction, which had submitted amendments concerning the provisions for compensating non-pecuniary damage. Although the lead committee asserted that the substantive issues had been resolved, the Center Party’s proposals failed to gain support and were therefore marked as disregarded. The disagreement was primarily substantive and procedural, rather than personal.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-06-06
Draft Act on Amendments to the Road Traffic Act and the Police and Border Guard Act (429 SE), second reading

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

There is not enough data.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-06-06
Second Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Act on Organizing the Energy Sector and Other Acts (356 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The opposition (the Isamaa faction) is mentioned neutrally only in relation to the submission of a single amendment proposal, which was received by the deadline. There is no criticism or counter-opposition; their proposal was addressed during the proceedings. No confrontation has been presented; rather, this constitutes factual information regarding the opposition's involvement.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-06-03
First Reading of the Draft Resolution (409 OE) of the Riigikogu "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic to Implement Effective Measures to Protect Minors from Exposure to Pornography"

Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary sitting.

The main opponents are the bill's sponsors ("the esteemed rapporteur"), who are criticized for proposing solutions that are unrealistic and restrict freedoms. The criticism is intense and politically charged, accusing the opposing side of resorting to totalitarian methods and lacking rational argumentation.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-30
Discussion of the nationally important issue: "How can the state avoid living in debt?"

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting

There is not enough data.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-29
First reading of the Riigikogu Draft Resolution "Supporting the Introduction of Nuclear Energy in Estonia" (431 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The criticism is primarily aimed at the indecisiveness within Estonia's energy sector, stressing the urgent need to make decisions and move forward. The speaker refutes claims that the draft legislation was timed specifically because of the European Parliament elections, or that nuclear energy is being ruled out due to a lack of necessity. Furthermore, the critics' assessments regarding the relative cost and lifespan of wind and nuclear energy are also being challenged.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-16
Debate on the matter of national importance initiated by the Economic Affairs Committee: "How to increase productivity in the Estonian economy?"

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session

No direct political confrontation is expressed. The criticism is aimed instead at the "general pessimism" prevalent among Estonian entrepreneurs and experts regarding the economy's competitiveness, a view with which the speaker does not entirely agree.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-15
Bill to Amend the Traffic Act and the Police and Border Guard Act (429 SE), First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

Insufficient data.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-15
Second reading of the Draft Act amending the Building Code and other Acts (Acceleration of the Deployment of Renewable Energy) (308 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

Strong opposition is directed at the obstructionist tactics employed by the EKRE faction, which manifested in the submission of 238 amendments. The criticism is procedural, stressing that the proposals were "insincere" and "mutually exclusive," and that the Riigikogu needs to conduct other business besides obstruction. The speaker defends the committee’s decision to bundle the insincere proposals together.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-15
The 2024 Report by the Minister of Climate on the Implementation of the State's Long-Term Development Strategy "Estonia 2035"

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

There is not enough data.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-09
Debate on the matter of significant national importance: "E-elections – a threat to democracy."

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The primary criticism is aimed at EKRE, whose repeated attempts to challenge the e-election results are deemed unsuccessful and procedurally flawed (for instance, the appeal was timed incorrectly). The speaker criticizes the motives of the opposition, implying that this is a political tactic designed to disregard the election outcome, rather than a genuine concern about security.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-08
First reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Motor Third Party Liability Insurance Act and Consequential Amendments to Other Acts (400 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session.

There is no direct opposition to specific political groups or individuals. Criticism is aimed instead at the public's lack of awareness regarding the associated damages and the obligation for clawback. The debate is focused instead on the details and points of consideration regarding the transposition of the directive.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-07
Third Reading of the Draft Act on the Amendment of the Riigikogu Election Act and the Amendment of Other Related Acts (Bill 344 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

Opponents are being characterized as individuals who spread rumors, hearsay, and hypotheses, despite no real incidents having been registered. Specifically, the comparison to Russia's e-voting system and Anastassia's remarks regarding m-voting risks related to the Google/Apple marketplaces are refuted. The criticism is aimed at the technical and factual inaccuracies of the counterarguments.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-04-18
Discussion of the matter of significant national importance, initiated by the Environmental Committee, titled "The necessity and possibilities of introducing nuclear energy in Estonia"

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The criticism is aimed at previous state-level indecision that has lasted for decades and diminished Estonia’s competitiveness, citing major missed investments as an example. Direct political opponents are not named; instead, the focus of the criticism is procedural sluggishness and an inability to make decisions.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-04-17
Second Reading of the Draft Act (344 SE) on the Amendment of the Riigikogu Election Act and Related Amendment of Other Acts

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The speaker is countering e-voting skeptics and those who spread misconceptions about the system's alleged lack of oversight. The criticism is aimed at technical misunderstandings, such as the claim that the software cannot be audited or verified. This counter-argument is technically justified, with the goal of refuting misinformation.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-04-10
First Reading of the Draft Act on the Amendment of the Competition Act and the Amendment of Other Associated Acts (384 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session

The opposition (specifically Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart and Mart Maastik) focused on the procedural speed of the draft bill and the selection of administrative procedure, preferring instead a misdemeanor procedure and a longer consultation period. The speaker reports the opposition's arguments and the voting results neutrally, noting that the majority of the committee rejected the proposals to postpone the procedure.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-04-10
Second Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Precious Metal Products Act, the State Fee Act, and the Equipment Safety Act (Bill 363 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session

There is absolutely no opposition; the speaker emphasizes that no amendments were received, and no opinions or proposals were obtained from interest groups (such as the Chamber of Commerce and Industry and professional associations).
View Profile View Agenda
2024-04-10
Second reading of the Draft Act amending the Electricity Market Act and other acts (Termination of universal service and ensuring security of supply) (Bill 351 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session

The main confrontation arose with the Isamaa faction, whose six amendment proposals concerning the continuation of the universal service in some format were rejected by the committee following a vote. The confrontation was policy-based and procedural, as the proposals were not eligible for a vote in the main chamber. The criticism was aimed at substantive disagreements regarding the continuation of the service.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-04-03
Second Reading of the Bill on the Amendment of the Electronic Communications Act and the Nature Conservation Act (392 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session

No direct criticism is leveled against the opposing parties; instead, we are correcting the premise presented by the Legal Department and the Data Protection Inspectorate concerning the technical aspects of transmitting hazard warnings. The criticism is directed at the inaccuracy of the premises, not at the individuals involved.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-03-07
Debate on the matter of national importance, "The Future of Estonian Energy 2035," initiated by the Estonian Reform Party parliamentary group.

Fifteenth Riigikogu, third sitting, plenary session

The direct opposition is evident in Martin Helme’s (apparent) denial of climate change, but this is more of an ideological disagreement than a personal attack. The criticism is aimed at the current indecision and the lack of a long-term plan in the energy sector, which is hindering investment. Fossil fuels are clearly unfavorable and undesirable in the future.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-03-06
First reading of the Bill (359 SE) for the Act supplementing the Act on the Organization of the Energy Sector and the Act on Environmental Impact Assessment and Environmental Management System

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

There is no direct or personal criticism. The opposition is manifested more on a procedural level, as demonstrated by the voting results concerning the motion to conclude the first reading (3 members voted against). The speaker is primarily addressing concerns related to the content of the bill (the omission of the EIA, local government autonomy) in order to dispel any doubts.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-03-05
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Organization of the Energy Sector Act and Other Acts (Bill 356 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session

Direct political opponents are not criticized, but criticism is leveled against those businesses who have been engaged in "market spoiling" in the liquid fuels sector. Furthermore, the argument regarding the sustainability of fossil technologies is rejected, citing their inability to compete in the market due to CO2 quotas.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-03-05
2024 Report by the Minister of Education and Research on the Implementation of the State's Long-Term Development Strategy "Eesti 2035" (Education Reforms)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The speaker indirectly opposes the current education system, which emphasizes the production of a mindless workforce, and criticizes the continuation of the narrowly focused mathematics exam. The criticism is aimed at existing teaching practices and the organization of the exams.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-02-14
First reading of the Draft Act amending the Electricity Market Act and other acts (termination of universal service and ensuring security of supply) (Bill 351 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The presenter himself does not express opposition, but he relays in detail the critical questions raised by committee members (e.g., Rain Epler, Mart Maastik) concerning the expediency of ending the universal service and the disappearance of the role of the Competition Authority. The criticism focuses on the lack of clarity regarding the content of the policy and its mechanisms (e.g., the timeline for reserve capacities).
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-23
Overview of the state of Research and Development and government policy in this field.

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

Opposing views or criticism are not being presented; instead, a constructive question is being directed to the government concerning the maintenance of the long-term component of science funding. The criticism is aimed primarily at the deficiencies of the current system (sudden changes, the loss of scientific schools of thought), not at specific individuals.
View Profile View Agenda
Back to Profiling