By Months: Priit Sibul
Total Months: 19
Fully Profiled: 19
10.2025
11 Speeches
The confrontation is directed against the individual or group responsible for the proceedings in the Finance Committee. The criticism is intense and focuses exclusively on procedural inefficiency and delays that have persisted since early spring.
09.2025
31 Speeches
The speaker is fiercely opposed to the government's actions, leveling policy-based and procedural criticism against the ministers' decisions. The primary targets of this criticism are the performance bonuses paid to the management of the Health Insurance Fund, the Ministry of Defence's botched procurements, and the obstruction of the National Audit Office's work. Furthermore, the speaker criticizes tax hikes, arguing they will exacerbate inflation and deepen the economic recession.
06.2025
21 Speeches
The main opponents are coalition politicians and ministers, whose actions are criticized for incompetence and lack of clarity (e.g., the conditions for accepting Swedish prisoners). Attacks are also aimed at the tax policies of the coalition partners (Eesti 200, Reformierakond), accusing them of hypocrisy (imposing taxes and then partially easing them as if it were a heroic act).
05.2025
20 Speeches
The main opponents are the government and the ministers, whose policies are sharply criticized for injustice and incompetence. The criticism is aimed both at the substance of the policy (violation of property rights, failure of the care reform) and at procedural issues (delays in regulations, reduction of compensation). There are also suspicions regarding the actions of coalition politicians (Anti Allas) concerning the promotion of investments similar to pork-barrel spending.
04.2025
8 Speeches
The main criticism is directed against the government coalition and the ministries, who are accused of unconditionally pursuing utopian goals and lacking a holistic vision. The criticism is policy- and procedure-based, questioning the consistent interpretation of laws and criticizing former Minister of the Interior Pevkur for ordering drones from China.
03.2025
15 Speeches
A strong opposition stance is aimed at the government and various ministries, criticizing the Ministry of Defence for delays and the Ministry of the Interior's handling of issues related to church law and investments (the Võru shooting range). He criticizes coalition MPs for failing to support previous draft legislation and the Prime Minister for a lack of clarity in labor policy. The criticism is primarily policy- and procedure-based, citing instances of misleading the public and making unreasonable decisions.
02.2025
14 Speeches
The main opponents are the government and the prime minister, who are accused of unreasonableness, failure to comply with laws, lack of transparency, and lying to the public regarding the calculations for energy subsidies. The criticism is based on both policy and procedure and is highly intense, manifesting in a direct vote of no confidence and sharp condemnation of the government's priorities (e.g., church law versus electoral rights).
01.2025
12 Speeches
A strong oppositional stance against the government, particularly the prime minister and the Reform Party. The criticism is directed at the government's inability to make decisions (the delaying of defense investments), the lack of financial transparency (regarding support for Nordica), and the Minister of Defence misleading the public concerning delivery schedules. The speaker also criticizes the historical defense spending policies of the Social Democrats.
12.2024
8 Speeches
The criticism is directed at the reluctance of ministry officials (from the Ministry of Social Affairs and the Ministry of Justice) to swiftly review child protection laws, with their inertia being cited as the reason. The Economic Affairs Committee and the coalition are also criticized for failing to support a more ambitious reduction of administrative burden, even though they did not substantively oppose the changes. Additionally, the Reform Party faction is criticized for its lack of accountability concerning regional decisions (specifically, the closure of institutions in Põlva County).
11.2024
27 Speeches
The main criticism is aimed at the governing coalition, especially the Reform Party, which is accused of attacking sacred issues (parental benefits) and exhibiting hypocrisy. The critic faults the government for justifying tax hikes by citing national defense, even though defense spending is actually being cut. The criticism is intense and addresses policy, procedures, and moral conduct.
10.2024
15 Speeches
The speaker is strongly opposed to the government, criticizing both the substance of its policies (cuts, excise duties) and the government’s overall attitude and procedural transparency. The criticism is directed straight at the ministers and their party colleagues, accusing them of disregarding previous promises and offering "empty words" on the subject of need-based benefits.
09.2024
11 Speeches
The main opponents are the governing coalition and its ministers, especially Minister of Defence Hanno Pevkur, regarding whom the prime minister is being asked to provide explanations concerning suspicions of a conflict of interest. Criticism is directed both at the substance of the policy (the unclear distribution of costs for the security tax) and at procedural flaws (lack of consultation, violation of Riigikogu procedural rules). The attacks are intense and demand accountability.
07.2024
10 Speeches
The main opponents are the Reform Party and the Social Democrats, who are accused of ideological flexibility and the "dictate of the Sotsid" in their pursuit of remaining in power. Criticism is aimed both at procedural errors (unconstitutionality, fast-tracking the implementation of taxes) and political instability (the reduction of benefits for large families, the issue of voting rights). The government's actions are considered destructive to public trust and irreparable, particularly due to the imposition of taxes under the pretext of "national defense."
06.2024
15 Speeches
The main opponents are the government coalition (the Reform Party, the Social Democrats, Estonia 200) and the leadership of the Finance Committee. Criticism is intense, focusing both on the substance of the policy (tax hikes) and procedural unfairness (the total overhaul of the draft bill and the ignoring of proposed amendments). The coalition is accused of ignoring democracy and passing absurd laws.
05.2024
14 Speeches
The main confrontation is with the governing coalition, which is being criticized for policy inconsistencies, inadequate impact analysis, and prioritizing internal compromises. Specific criticism is also directed at former leaders of the Reform Party regarding the registration of Moscow Patriarchate congregations in 2002. The criticism is primarily policy- and procedure-based, casting doubt on the government's motives and competence.
04.2024
13 Speeches
The opposition is primarily directed at the procedural choices made by the government (Ministry of Justice), specifically concerning the rushed implementation of legal system changes and the absence of a proper impact assessment. It questions the rationale for choosing a special administrative procedure over the standard procedure for minor offenses, and publicly cites the views of the Chancellor of Justice, which diverge from those held by the Ministry. Furthermore, it criticizes the ambiguity of Isamaa's proposals regarding sanctions.
03.2024
8 Speeches
The criticism is primarily aimed at the Ministry of Education and Research and the Ministry of Culture, citing incompetence, lack of resources, and unreasonable procedural methods. The opposition is particularly strong regarding the amendment of the Cultural Endowment Act, which delegates the power to add objects to the minister, thereby circumventing the will of Parliament. The criticism is policy- and procedure-based, not personal.
02.2024
17 Speeches
The primary criticism is aimed at the Riigikogu leadership due to the return of the interpellation and technical irregularities. Substantively, there is opposition to the government bills concerning the car tax and the duplication of the financing system for cultural objects. The opposition is intense and focuses on the unreasonableness, redundancy, and the delegation of Parliament's exclusive right to the minister.
01.2024
13 Speeches
The speaker adopts a strongly oppositional stance, criticizing the government (especially the Prime Minister and the Finance Minister) for its unstable fiscal policy and lack of transparency. He takes officials to task for the casual way they classify documents and highlights the apparent lack of communication among cabinet members. The criticism is primarily procedural and political, accusing the government of eroding public trust.