By Plenary Sessions: Priit Sibul

The confrontation targets the government's actions and procedures, criticizing the unexpected nature and lack of clarity of the decision to allocate 2.6 billion. The criticism is directed at the Ministry of Climate and the Ministry of Finance for failing to conduct consultation and for the absence of adequate financial data.

The primary confrontation is aimed at the government and the Prime Minister, who are sharply criticized for the incompetent handling of policy and for providing false information to the public. The criticism is both procedural (a lack of supporting calculations) and personal (accusations of lying), indicating an uncompromising opposition to the government’s operational methods.

The standoff is aimed at the coalition and the bill's rapporteur, criticizing their lack of analysis and the unjustified expansion of voting rights. The criticism is intense and focuses on political rationality and procedural grounds. The speaker refers to the coalition's positions as inconsistent or even hypocritical.

Expresses strong opposition to the Prime Minister and the government, criticizing both the substance of the policy (energy, voting rights) and the priorities (amendment of the Churches Act). The criticism escalates to the level of the Prime Minister's personal trust and legitimacy.

The criticism is directed at the earlier inaction and currently insufficient response of the major Western European powers (Germany, France, Italy) to the changed security situation. The main opposing force is defined as cooperating authoritarian states, whose shared mindset threatens the free world.