By Plenary Sessions: Priit Sibul

The main criticism is directed at the economic policy of the Prime Minister and the government. The opposition is tied to the raising of the value-added tax (VAT), which is fueling inflation, and the Prime Minister's unclear positions regarding the regulation of commercial premises. The criticism is based on both policy substance and a lack of clarity.

The opposition is aimed at the government's budget decisions, particularly concerning the withdrawal of funding for Rail Baltic, as well as the accuracy of the information presented to the committee by officials (police officers). The criticism is both substantive and procedural, focusing on exposing discrepancies.

No direct political opposition or personal criticism is being leveled, but the inflationary impact of the tax hikes is being scrutinized. The criticism focuses on the consequences of the policy (rising prices) and the pressure generated by the fiscal rules.

The main opposition is directed at the Environmental Board, which is criticized for failing to meet its notification requirements and for imposing unfair restrictions. The criticism is procedural and policy-based, focusing on the state agency's lack of transparency and unfair treatment of landowners.

There is too little data.

The main criticism is directed at the minister's actions and decisions, particularly concerning the setting of performance bonuses for the Health Insurance Fund board. The criticism is both procedural and political, focusing on the lack of oversight and inconsistencies found in official documents. The speaker also questions the minister's claims of legal constraints that prevented the review of these decisions.

The main criticism is aimed at the minister, whose previous principled stance (payment strictly in cash) is being contrasted with his current acceptance of the Health Insurance Fund’s expenditures. The criticism is policy-driven, focusing on inconsistencies in budget management and a fundamental lack of continuity in principle.

The primary adversary is the minister responsible for the sector, whose speech is being criticized for its lack of substance, as well as the government overall due to failed procurements and insufficient audit transparency. The criticism is intense and focuses on specific procedural and performance failures, such as the acquisition of defective weapons and the obstruction of the National Audit Office.

The main targets are the governing coalition, especially Defense Minister Hanno Pevkur, who is accused of misleading the public regarding the deadlines for ammunition procurement. Criticism is also aimed at the Riigikogu Board and its Chairman due to the lack of transparency surrounding procedural decisions (such as returning the interpellation and setting the agenda order). The opposition is intense and focuses on both political and procedural inconsistencies.