By Plenary Sessions: Priit Sibul

They advocate for lowering taxes to stimulate the economy, particularly cutting VAT on foodstuffs, with the goal of improving industrial competitiveness and keeping final prices in check. They oppose raising taxes during an economic downturn, viewing such a move as unreasonable and inflationary.

Economic perspectives focus on public investments, offering strong support for Rail Baltic and voicing concern when funds are diverted from crucial investments during budget planning. The emphasis is placed squarely on safeguarding strategic investments.

Economic policy stances are anti-inflationary and fiscally prudent. There is recognition of the need to comply with budget rules by increasing the revenue stream, but concern is highlighted that tax hikes themselves will drive up prices. The goal is to find a solution that protects the budget's revenue side while simultaneously preventing further price inflation.

Insufficient data.

Economic perspectives favor market development and opportunity creation, while raising concerns about overly stringent regulations that could impede the realization of economic potential. The focus is on financial sector oversight, which must be flexible enough for new entrants, while simultaneously excluding unscrupulous opportunists.

Economic views emphasize fiscal responsibility and question the sensibility of setting performance-based pay in the public sector. The speaker demands clarity regarding the costs associated with the Competition Authority's supplementary task, citing the necessity of knowing the precise scope of work.

Economic perspectives emphasize fiscal discipline and transparency when it comes to public sector payroll. There is a preference for cash wages over benefits, and criticism is directed at expenditures that trigger additional fringe benefit tax liabilities. The impact of inflation and the necessity of motivating employees are acknowledged, but it is insisted that this motivation must be delivered via monetary compensation.

Economic perspectives manifest themselves as a demand for fiscal responsibility and transparency in public procurement, especially concerning large defense expenditures. The criticism addresses the inefficient use of public funds (defective weapons) and the proper accounting of inventory (707.8 million euros).

Expresses concern regarding the state's finances and the efficient use of public funds, criticizing vague tax schemes (the security tax) and the negative impact of the VAT increase on the defense budget (resulting in less ammunition). It raises the question of how funding for cultural objects can be guaranteed when the addition of new projects strains the existing budget.