By Plenary Sessions: Priit Sibul

The opposition's stance is directed at the governing coalition, particularly the Reform Party and the Social Democrats, criticizing their political choices and motives. The criticism targets both the substance of the policy (the land tax viewed as redistribution) and the procedure (making compromises without involving target groups and inconsistent legislative oversight in the energy sector).

The criticism targets the general political and societal "very open mind" regarding the resolution of language problems. The government is also criticized for its inability to ensure adequate control over foreign students entering the labor market who subsequently move into the service sector. The criticism is policy- and value-based.

The primary adversary is the minister and the government, who are sharply criticized for their detachment and for ignoring security threats. The criticism is both political (concerning citizenship policy) and moral (cynicism), calling the government’s priorities into question. The intensity of the attack is high, and no willingness to compromise is evident.

Insufficient data.

The criticism is aimed at the government and the steering committee, accusing them of inadequate preparation of the draft bill and inconsistent security policy. The criticism is particularly sharp regarding historical accountability, highlighting past decisions made by current members of the ruling parties (Ain Seppik and Siim Kallas) concerning the registration of the Moscow Patriarchate. It challenges the executive branch's assertions that political statements are required to initiate legal action.