By Plenary Sessions: Priit Sibul

The political stance is strongly oppositional, focusing on the government's ineffective attempts at compromise and its unfair tax policies. Specific criticism is directed at the expansion of the land tax increase ceiling, which is estimated to lead to wealth redistribution and places landowners in a difficult position. The need is also stressed for greater parliamentary oversight of major energy projects (such as offshore wind), thereby calling into question the limits of the government's decision-making authority.

The political stance is strongly value-based, centered on protecting the Estonian language and culture. They express concern that freedom itself might pose a greater threat to the preservation of the language than occupation did. Furthermore, worries have been highlighted regarding the uncontrolled labor market and the resulting absence of language requirements within the service sector. The speaker criticizes society's overly permissive attitude toward these language issues.

The political focus is heavily centered on national security and citizenship policy. The speaker vigorously opposes the granting of supplementary citizenship and deems it cynical that supporters of Putin are allowed to vote in local elections. This stance is value-driven and highly critical of the government’s inaction, specifically highlighting the inherent security risks.

The political stance centers on integrating foreign and security policy with domestic legislation. The speaker strongly advocates for refining the draft legislation by replacing the general term "citizens of third countries" with the more specific and value-driven definition: "citizens of states supporting aggression." This demonstrates a robust, value-based approach that underscores accountability for supporting aggression.

Strong opposition to the government's tax policy, particularly to bills viewed purely as revenue-generating measures rather than tools designed to incentivize specific behaviors. The political platform is also focused on highlighting inconsistencies in legislative continuity and security policy, such as maintaining the voting rights of citizens of the Russian Federation in local elections. Furthermore, the speaker emphasizes the necessity of considering religious values and holidays in the organization of parliamentary work.