By Plenary Sessions: Priit Sibul

No data available

The style of interaction is formal and interrogative, directed at the rapporteur of the draft bill to gain clarity regarding the impact of the legislation and the mandate of the Language Authority. The speaker addresses the presenter respectfully but demands concrete answers concerning the implementation of the law.

Information regarding the willingness to cooperate is lacking; the rhetoric is purely confrontational and aimed at sharp criticism of government policy.

The speaker demonstrates a willingness to cooperate, justifying their proposal by referencing previous joint parliamentary debates and adopted statements, and directly soliciting the rapporteur's opinion. This suggests a desire to find a reasonable and common solution for clarifying the legislation.

Seeks cooperation with the parliament's board to resolve procedural issues, asking the board to convene and discuss the removal of an agenda item. Refers to the appeal made by the President of the Estonian Council of Churches (Urmas Viilma), demonstrating a willingness to rely on an external authority when addressing religious topics. Is ready to initiate votes for the implementation of procedural changes.