By Plenary Sessions: Priit Sibul
Total Sessions: 99
Fully Profiled: 99
2025-10-16
XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
The collaborative style is highly respectful and supportive of the initiative’s presenter, who is thanked for their leadership and responses. The speaker seeks to constructively explain the scope of the policy, which indicates a readiness to support and clarify the initiative.
2025-10-15
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Information Hour
The relative consensus between the National Defence Committee and the Ministry of Defence regarding arms restrictions is noted, indicating potential cooperation in advancing this policy. While the style of communication with the Prime Minister is demanding, hope is expressed for a swift resolution.
2025-10-14
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
Not enough data.
2025-10-13
15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
No data available.
2025-10-07
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
Not enough data
2025-10-06
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
Insufficient data.
2025-09-25
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
Not enough data.
2025-09-24
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
The cooperative style demonstrates an openness to support a "reasonable initiative" and references the fact-checking work performed by colleagues (such as Varro Vooglaid), which suggests information sharing within the parliament. International cooperation is crucial, as questions are being raised regarding the positions of Latvia and Lithuania.
2025-09-18
15th Estonian Parliament, 6th sitting, plenary session.
The collaborative approach focuses on involving experts and seeking advice (from the President of the Bank of Estonia) to resolve a complex economic issue. This demonstrates a willingness to engage in dialogue and a search for professional expertise to solve a national problem.
2025-09-16
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
The style of cooperation is demonstrated by appealing to the Chancellor of Justice, seeking a resolution to verify the legality of the Environmental Board’s actions and to improve procedural regulations. There is no information available regarding cooperation with other Riigikogu factions or political stakeholders.
2025-09-11
15th Riigikogu, 6th plenary sitting
The collaboration style is open and appreciative, offering the presenter praise for their contribution to the development of the field. The speaker encourages dialogue by posing questions within the context of finding solutions, which indicates a desire to move forward constructively ("What could we do?").
2025-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2025-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, press briefing
Insufficient data.
2025-09-09
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session.
Insufficient data.
2025-09-04
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
Works in close cooperation with colleagues from the Isamaa faction, co-sponsoring numerous interpellations and draft legislation (e.g., Solman, Kokk, Seeder, Epler). He/She also demonstrates a readiness to approach other political parties (e.g., Toomas Kivimägi) in order to secure support for taking the interpellations into procedure.
2025-06-18
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Not enough data.
2025-06-16
XV Riigikogu, V Session, Plenary Sitting
Insufficient data.
2025-06-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
There is not enough data.
2025-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The speaker points to his cooperation with colleague Valdo Randpere during the investigation of the Ministry of the Interior’s action plans, which demonstrates a willingness to conduct internal factional research. He also mentions previous representational experience at the church council (synod) of the Estonian Apostolic Orthodox Church connected to Constantinople, showing experience in broad-based organizations. He now addresses his colleagues to seek clarification.
2025-06-04
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker thanks the Chairman of the Environment Committee for the sensible proposal to suspend the reading and calls upon colleagues to submit serious amendments. This demonstrates a willingness to cooperate for the sake of improving the law, by actively participating as the proposer of amendments.
2025-06-03
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fifth session, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2025-06-02
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session
The style of cooperation is inquisitive and seeks clarification, requesting the Minister's assistance in comprehending complex budget amendments. This demonstrates a readiness for dialogue to grasp the specifics of the legislation, even if the overall stance is critical.
2025-05-21
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
The speaker refers to the direct and positive cooperation with their "good seatmate," integrating the latter's proposal into their own question. This demonstrates a readiness for immediate and informed collaboration with colleagues in their immediate vicinity.
2025-05-21
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing.
In terms of cooperation, a previous shared understanding with one minister regarding the inflexibility of the Arms Act was noted, which the minister expressed by giving a thumbs up. This indicates a readiness to find common ground on specific regulatory issues, despite the generally critical tone.
2025-05-15
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2025-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
Information regarding cooperation is unavailable. The speaker is focused on sharply criticizing the policies of the Minister and the coalition and posing questions.
2025-05-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.
The speaker is collaborating with colleague Rain Epler on submitting a parliamentary query and supports the actions of Minister Igor Taro (of the Social Democratic Party, another political party) regarding the amendment of the Arms Act. He/She demonstrates a readiness to support substantive, forward-looking initiatives, even while simultaneously criticizing the narrow concept of investments made within the ministry's administrative domain.
2025-05-07
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The data is insufficient. Although the speaker's actions are aimed at managing the parliament's workflow, there was no mention of cooperation, willingness to compromise, or cross-party activity.
2025-05-05
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The speaker underscores the necessity of cooperation during the proceedings ("what else we should resolve during the process"), which demonstrates a readiness to address issues internally within the parliament.
2025-04-23
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing
It supports international cooperation and the mobilization of European Union resources to solve common border problems, deeming this an "entirely reasonable" strategy. Cooperation is primarily envisioned with partner countries (Lithuania) for sharing experiences in resolving similar issues.
2025-04-22
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The style of cooperation is open and respectful, soliciting input from the minister to establish a new prioritization framework, leveraging the minister's previous experience in parliament. This indicates a desire to enhance procedural cooperation between the executive and legislative branches.
2025-04-16
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
There is not enough data.
2025-04-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker refers to the questions and arguments raised by other colleagues (Varro Vooglaid, Mrs. Poolamets), indicating that they are participating in a discussion based on criticism presented by others. Direct cooperation with other political parties is not visible.
2025-03-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker participates in a question-and-answer session with the committee chairman, seeking clarification on the implementation of the proposed amendments. Ultimately, however, due to his disagreement regarding the parliament's competence, he declares his non-participation in the vote, which suggests a principled withdrawal rather than a readiness to compromise on the matter at hand.
2025-03-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing
Insufficient data.
2025-03-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The style of cooperation is formal and respectful, with questions directed to the rapporteur in accordance with the parliament's rules of procedure. Information regarding broader coalitions or a willingness to compromise is absent.
2025-03-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker expresses conditional support for the new government regarding the implementation of right-wing policies, but shifts the focus of the dialogue toward demanding control and accountability. This cooperation is manifested by supporting the government's stated objectives (right-wing politics, supporting Ukraine), while simultaneously insisting that these objectives be met.
2025-03-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker referenced previous failed cooperation, noting that coalition MPs failed to support the Isamaa faction's substantive proposal to procure ammunition more quickly. He expressed hope that the Minister of Defense has now secured the support of the coalition members, which suggests the expectation that cooperation with the government will be possible moving forward.
2025-02-27
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Not enough data.
2025-02-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, press briefing
There is insufficient data. The speaker is operating from an oppositional position, demanding answers and transparency from the government, rather than offering cooperation.
2025-02-25
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2025-02-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Not enough data
2025-02-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The speaker strongly supports regional cooperation, seeking confirmation regarding the deepening of foreign and security cooperation among the Nordic-Baltic and Baltic Sea countries following the start of the full-scale war in Ukraine. The focus of this cooperation is clearly defined, both geographically and thematically, centering on security and foreign policy.
2025-01-28
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The style of interaction is interrogative, directed at the rapporteur regarding the coalition's positions and the potential impact of the draft legislation. The speaker demands information concerning the discussion held within the coalition regarding the change in the quota. There is no information available regarding cooperation or the search for compromise with other political forces.
2025-01-21
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The cooperation style is faction-centric (the Isamaa faction), drawing on issues raised by the Commander of the Defence Forces and the former Chancellor, which lends legitimacy to the draft bill. There is no cross-party cooperation, as the coalition's actions are being sharply criticized.
2025-01-15
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing
Insufficient data.
2024-12-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The collaborative style indicates a desire to support broad-based consensus, highlighting the joint position of the Chamber of Commerce and Eesti 200, which the commission ignored. Furthermore, positive reference is made to Isamaa's proposal for reducing administrative burden, demonstrating openness to alternative solutions.
2024-12-10
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The speaker is open to dialogue, thanking the presenter for raising the topic and continuing with questions. They also referred to the question of another deputy (Anastassia) regarding the parliament’s reputation, showing a willingness to connect discussion topics and find common areas of concern.
2024-12-03
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The speaker supports the amendments submitted by another politician (Riina Solman), which indicates cooperation with colleagues in initiating legislation. The communication with the rapporteur is polite and formal.
2024-11-20
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The style of cooperation is rather procedural, offering options on how to make a potentially unconstitutional proposal (referencing the Isamaa faction’s proposal) lawful by merging it with another draft constitutional amendment currently under procedure. Direct readiness for compromise is not expressed; rather, the focus is on seeking legally correct solutions.
2024-11-13
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.
The speaker is clearly acting as a representative of the Isamaa faction, requesting a vote in favor of the faction's amendments. He addresses coalition members (Andrus Seeme, Igor Taro) regarding the resolution of regional problems, but expresses doubt about their actual influence. Overall, he is uncompromising regarding the government's policy.
2024-11-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The speaker is acting independently, apologizing to his fellow members of the Isamaa faction and noting that his views may not necessarily reflect the faction's collective position. Nevertheless, he expresses support for and thanks to Varro Vooglaid, the initiator of the bill, for raising this important topic.
2024-11-05
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2024-10-23
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
The speeches reveal neither cooperation nor openness to compromise; the style is rather controlling and demanding, focused on correcting the minister's errors and ensuring promises are kept. The only indication of cooperation is a request for the minister to help locate the appropriate budget line for submitting an amendment.
2024-10-16
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The collaborative style is pragmatic and respectful, even in the face of opposition, with an effort made to avoid causing offense or being untruthful. The speaker asks the minister for assistance in locating the correct budget line for proposing an amendment, thereby demonstrating a readiness for procedural cooperation.
2024-10-15
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
Insufficient data
2024-10-14
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
Insufficient data.
2024-10-08
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
Not enough data.
2024-09-25
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, press briefing
The cooperative style is merely nominal: the speaker acknowledges the Prime Minister for a crucial defense decision, highlighting his significant role in making it. He also appeals to the Prime Minister for assistance in resolving a situation concerning the Minister of Defense's activities, implicitly referencing the PM's past competence in handling such attacks.
2024-09-18
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
The style of cooperation is confrontational towards the government, but the speaker refers to colleagues' proposals within the committee (e.g., the inclusion of the national broadcaster), which demonstrates an openness to cross-party lawmaking. He stresses, however, the inadequacy and inefficiency of the engagement process carried out by the government with interest groups (such as representatives of general practitioners and the banking sector).
2024-09-17
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
There is not enough data.
2024-09-16
The 15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting.
Data is scarce.
2024-09-11
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
Lack of data
2024-07-29
15th Riigikogu, Riigikogu extraordinary session.
There is not enough data.
2024-07-29
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
No willingness to cooperate is expressed; instead, there is sharp criticism of the political opportunism and ideological flexibility displayed by the government partners (the Reform Party and the Social Democrats). Examples are provided of how the Reform Party's policies (e.g., benefits for large families) change depending on their coalition partners.
2024-07-22
15th Riigikogu, Riigikogu's extraordinary session.
Cooperation is discussed in a negative context, referencing the political incompatibility and volatility of decisions seen in previous coalitions (Kaja Kallas with Isamaa) and potential future coalitions (the Social Democrats). There is no mention of openness to compromise or cross-party cooperation.
2024-07-15
15th Riigikogu, Extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The speaker references the opposition's previous positions ("what the opposition said"), which indicates cooperation within the opposition in formulating a unified stance. There is no information regarding their willingness to compromise with the governing coalition.
2024-06-13
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session
The collaborative style is open and inquisitive, involving politely addressing the server to obtain information. This indicates a readiness for dialogue and the acceptance of expert knowledge.
2024-06-12
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.
There is insufficient data. The speaker refers to previous time spent in government ("You and we have been in government"), but the current communication is primarily aimed at challenging the representatives of the commission and the ministers, and demanding clarity.
2024-06-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The speaker identifies with the opposition (Isamaa and other opposition parties) and criticizes the coalition’s demands directed at the opposition (specifically, that proposals be discussed within the faction), even while the coalition itself submits multiple versions of the draft bill. No willingness to compromise with the coalition is evident; instead, it is stressed that the opposition’s work has been rendered pointless.
2024-06-03
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary sitting.
Insufficient Data
2024-05-29
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
No data available
2024-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The style of interaction is formal and interrogative, directed at the rapporteur of the draft bill to gain clarity regarding the impact of the legislation and the mandate of the Language Authority. The speaker addresses the presenter respectfully but demands concrete answers concerning the implementation of the law.
2024-05-13
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
Information regarding the willingness to cooperate is lacking; the rhetoric is purely confrontational and aimed at sharp criticism of government policy.
2024-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session.
The speaker demonstrates a willingness to cooperate, justifying their proposal by referencing previous joint parliamentary debates and adopted statements, and directly soliciting the rapporteur's opinion. This suggests a desire to find a reasonable and common solution for clarifying the legislation.
2024-05-02
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Seeks cooperation with the parliament's board to resolve procedural issues, asking the board to convene and discuss the removal of an agenda item. Refers to the appeal made by the President of the Estonian Council of Churches (Urmas Viilma), demonstrating a willingness to rely on an external authority when addressing religious topics. Is ready to initiate votes for the implementation of procedural changes.
2024-04-30
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session.
Insufficient information
2024-04-29
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2024-04-16
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The speaker emphasized constructive cooperation with the minister, noting that common ground and solutions have always been found on substantive issues. This points to an openness to compromise and meaningful dialogue.
2024-04-11
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The speaker commends the initiative of the Chairman of the Rural Affairs Committee and seeks solutions by asking the presenter about political priorities. He/She emphasizes the need to strengthen cooperation between the agriculture and defense sectors to ensure food security. He/She is open to discussion to find solutions regarding education and attitudes.
2024-04-10
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The speaker addresses the leadership of the Riigikogu and the rapporteurs with respect, but their communication is primarily aimed at critical oversight and seeking alternatives. There is no evidence of cooperation or attempts to find compromises with other factions.
2024-04-01
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
There is no information regarding cooperation, willingness to compromise, or inter-party communication.
2024-03-20
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The cooperative style is respectful, addressing the rapporteur politely ("Dear Rapporteur"), but simultaneously demanding and persistent. The speaker seeks collaboration to improve the draft law, posing clarifying questions and emphasizing the necessity of a common understanding.
2024-03-19
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2024-03-11
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The speaker collaborated with five colleagues on the submission of the interpellation, demonstrating a willingness to form smaller working groups for oversight. He/She acknowledged the responses provided by the Auditor General and approvingly referenced a similar question raised by colleague Signe Kivi, while remaining open to input from other members of parliament.
2024-03-05
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The speaker values substantive debate in parliament, noting that such a forum is rare, which points to a desire for constructive dialogue. However, there is no direct mention of seeking compromises or cooperating with the government, with the focus instead being on highlighting the ministry's errors.
2024-02-22
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
The style of collaboration is polite and dialogue-oriented, with the server being addressed respectfully. There is no data concerning coalitions, compromises, or cross-party cooperation.
2024-02-21
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The style of cooperation demonstrates intra-factional unity, as a proposal is being made on behalf of the Isamaa faction to suspend the second reading of the bill. Reference is also made to dialogue with colleagues (e.g., Signe Kivi) in the context of previous discussions. Regarding the bill, an oppositional stance has been adopted, which precludes compromise in its current form.
2024-02-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The collaboration style is respectful and centered on acquiring expertise. The speaker thanks the presenter for the presentation and requests their assessment and forecasts, demonstrating openness to specialized input and solution finding.
2024-02-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
There is no information regarding broad-based cooperation or a willingness to compromise with the government partners. The speaker points out the similarity to the question raised by colleague Maastik, which indicates a unity of views with colleagues on certain issues.
2024-02-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
There is too little data.
2024-01-25
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The cooperative style is interrogative and demands specific answers and a timeline regarding the future comprehensive bill from the government representative (the rapporteur). There is no indication of a willingness to compromise; rather, the focus is on demanding information and accountability.
2024-01-24
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The style of cooperation is formal and scrutinizing, presenting the minister with pointed questions regarding deficiencies in lawmaking and practical application. There is no data available regarding inter-party cooperation or willingness to compromise.
2024-01-23
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2024-01-22
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The speaker is cooperating within their faction (a meeting with the Data Protection Inspectorate) and calls upon the Ministry of Justice to act swiftly in drafting the legislative amendments. He/She expresses hope that the discussion with the Minister will prove fruitful, demonstrating an openness to substantive problem-solving.
2024-01-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
Not enough data.
2024-01-11
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The speaker demonstrates a willingness to collaborate by acknowledging the significance of the issue raised by the presenter and asking clarifying questions. They are open to finding a solution, although they express doubts about the ideal nature of the proposed solution, which indicates a readiness for further discussion.
2024-01-10
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
Information is lacking. The speaker is clearly operating from an oppositional stance, posing sharp questions to the government, and the pursuit of cooperation or compromise is not reflected in the speeches delivered.
2024-01-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
The speaker highlights previous successful collaboration with the minister, suggesting an openness to relevant debate and a substantive discussion of the issues. Furthermore, an attempt is being made through body language to identify like-minded individuals (specifically, the session chairman, Toomas), which points to a desire to garner broader support for the requirement of clarity.