By Plenary Sessions: Priit Sibul

The speaker demonstrates expertise in the specifics of tax legislation, referencing the statutory 10% limit on land tax increases and the context of errors committed by the MTA (Tax and Customs Board). Furthermore, they exhibit knowledge of the regulatory design of the energy sector, distinguishing the decision-making processes for nuclear power and offshore wind energy. Specific legislative terminology and figures are employed to underscore the policy inconsistencies.

The speaker demonstrates expertise in the history of language policy and the education sector, citing Professor Rein Taagepera’s earlier analysis and linking language problems to migration and labor market regulations. This expertise connects the language issues with the oversight capabilities of the Language Inspectorate (Keeleamet) and the practical implementation of the draft legislation.

The speaker demonstrates awareness of the security sector and current events in Estonian society, accusing the minister of being estranged from these topics. He/She references specific political solutions that were considered in the coalition agreement, and names specific politicians (Ossinovski, Odinets).

The expertise is evident in the legislative terminology and procedure, proposing a specific amendment to improve the wording of the draft bill. The speaker also refers to previous parliamentary statements and discussions, demonstrating awareness of the institutional context and political consensus.

Demonstrates expertise in parliamentary rules of procedure and legislative procedure, posing detailed questions regarding the powers of the Presidium, possibilities for changing the agenda, and voting procedures. Is also familiar with the requirements for preparing draft legislation, criticizing the lack of an impact assessment and demanding the submission of a list of specific taxable objects. Possesses knowledge of recent Estonian history concerning the registration of churches and political accountability.