By Plenary Sessions: Priit Sibul

The criticism is aimed at the coalition and the Economic Committee, faulting them for selecting suboptimal thresholds and rejecting superior proposals (such as those from Isamaa and the Chamber of Commerce). The opposition is both procedural and policy-based, specifically criticizing the short-sightedness demonstrated in the application of these regulations.

Intense criticism is aimed at the Reform Party, which stands accused of failing to take responsibility for regional decisions. The speaker points out that even though there is a large representation of Southeast Estonian MPs in the Reform Party faction, they did not accept accountability for the closure of the Põlva County courthouse and the SKA. The criticism is performance-based and regionally focused.

The dispute is directed at officials of the Ministry of Social Affairs and the Ministry of Justice who did not consider it necessary to immediately review the provisions of the Child Protection Act. The criticism targets the officials' justification that the current version has been in force for too short a period, despite the serious substance of the proposed amendments.