By Plenary Sessions: Priit Sibul

The rhetorical style is analytical and questioning, at times expressing frustration over failed procedural decisions ("I just don't get it"). The speaker uses logical arguments, emphasizing the need for predictability and planning, and illustrates their viewpoints with the metaphor of the "stepped ladder."

The rhetorical style is interrogative and analytical, focusing on posing problems and seeking solutions. The speaker employs numerous rhetorical questions to highlight the complexity of measuring parliamentary work and the lack of accountability for regional decisions. The tone is formal, but it includes sharp criticism directed at the inaction of certain political forces.

The rhetorical style is formal, detailed, and question-oriented, aiming to gain confirmation regarding the discussions held within the commission and the viewpoints of ministry officials. It employs an analytical and persistent tone, focusing on facts and procedural details ("Did I understand correctly?").