By Months: Vadim Belobrovtsev
Total Months: 19
Fully Profiled: 19
10.2025
24 Speeches
The political focus is on improving the well-being of families with children and addressing the demographic situation. The speaker supports tax relief but criticizes the government's proposed 100-euro limit as insufficient, demanding stronger support, such as abolishing the car tax for large families. The position is strongly value-based, emphasizing the necessity of taking every step that would improve the situation of families.
09.2025
117 Speeches
The speaker is a strong opposition politician who focuses on social issues, public safety, and financial relief for citizens. Key policy positions include abolishing the car tax, significantly raising the minimum salary thresholds for public sector workers (cultural staff, teachers, rescue workers, police officers), and resolving the demographic crisis by increasing family benefits. The political framework is heavily geared toward criticizing the government’s actions and defending social values, accusing the government of being anti-family and protecting the interests of banks.
06.2025
50 Speeches
The political stance is fiercely oppositional, centered on sharp criticism of the government’s social policy (cuts to family support, taxing pensions) and fiscal policy (the proposed car tax, VAT). Key priorities include protecting vulnerable groups (pensioners, families with children) and drawing attention to the underfunding of the education sector (school meals, teachers’ wages). The criticism is primarily outcome-based and values-driven, stressing the risk of rising poverty. They also strongly oppose the government’s plans to lease Swedish prisoners and to pressure churches.
05.2025
34 Speeches
The speaker is a prominent opposition politician who centers his platform on social and wage policy, championing workers' rights and protecting the weaker party against the interests of employers. He delivers sharp criticism against the government for failing to fulfill promises (specifically teachers’ salaries) and for implementing inadequate reforms (the tax hump, education reform). His political stance is deeply value-based, stressing constitutional principles (freedom of religion and suffrage) and public security (the Kopli fire and rescue squad).
04.2025
31 Speeches
The speaker represents a strong opposition stance, focusing on social justice and economic inequality. Key issues include opposing regressive taxes (such as the car tax and high VAT) and protecting civil liberties (freedom of religion and voting rights). The government’s actions are criticized as policies that punish the poor and divide society, all while ignoring the consequences of the economic downturn.
03.2025
22 Speeches
The political position is strongly oppositional, focusing on the demographic crisis, unfair tax policy (the car tax, cuts to family benefits), and the restriction of civil rights (voting rights, religious freedom). The speaker deems the government's actions unjust and catastrophic, emphasizing the need for economic confidence and public trust in the state. The political framework is heavily geared toward criticizing the inefficiency and fundamental injustice inherent in the government's activities.
02.2025
56 Speeches
The speaker positions themselves as a defender of fundamental democratic rights and social cohesion, contrasting this with the government's "steamroller politics" and initiatives that divide society. The main themes addressed are the restriction of voting rights, the failure to implement a bank tax, and sharp criticism of the government's management style (lack of transparency, infighting within the coalition). The speaker favors a political framework that focuses on governmental incompetence and injustice (citing collective responsibility and the closure of the Kopli fire station).
01.2025
34 Speeches
The political position is strongly oppositional, focusing on criticizing the government's actions and the transparency of the budget. Key issues include the demographic crisis and family support, where the cutting of benefits is criticized, as well as opposition to the revocation of voting rights, which is deemed undemocratic. The criticism is primarily aimed at the government's inefficiency, political culture, and tax hikes. The speaker accuses the government of using political technology tactics to obscure important issues.
12.2024
34 Speeches
A strong oppositional stance regarding the government's tax policy and budget management, criticizing the rising tax burden and the introduction of new types of taxes (e.g., a security tax, a car tax). The political position is aimed at protecting the economic security of ordinary people and exposing the government's inefficiency and controversial decisions (such as the closure of the Kopli fire station). There is firm opposition to changing the voting rights for local elections and to state interference in the jurisdiction of local governments.
11.2024
32 Speeches
The speaker is a powerful opposition politician, focusing his efforts on sharply criticizing the government's economic policy (a recession now entering its third year) and the 2025 state budget. He places social justice at the forefront, opposing cuts that disproportionately affect the poorest and least secure segments of the population (pensioners, families with children), while simultaneously demanding a salary increase for civil servants. His political stance is strongly values-based, emphasizing the protection of democratic principles and integration (specifically citing voting rights and the pressure being exerted on the church).
10.2024
26 Speeches
The speaker is a prominent opposition figure who focuses on criticizing the government's actions across social, economic, and foreign policy. Key issues include consumer protection (expensive and slow internet service), social justice (taxing pensioners and the rising cost of healthcare), and a lack of budget transparency. The rhetoric is highly confrontational, accusing the government of taking a cynical approach toward vulnerable population groups.
09.2024
41 Speeches
The political position is strongly oppositional, focusing on the social sector (child benefits, school lunches) and the freezing of public sector wages (police, rescue workers, cultural employees). The government's actions are most sharply criticized as anti-family, linking them directly to the demographic crisis and inflation. The criticism is primarily directed at the effectiveness and value-based choices of the government's policies, demanding greater state support for less privileged groups.
07.2024
21 Speeches
The political position is strongly oppositional, focusing on resistance to the car tax and highlighting its constitutional and economic flaws. They also sharply criticize the high cost and slow speed of Estonian internet services, labeling the situation a national disgrace. The general framework involves harsh criticism of the government's activities and work style, stressing that the new administration is essentially identical to the previous one.
06.2024
28 Speeches
A strong oppositional stance, focusing on criticizing the government’s unpopular tax hikes and budget policy, labeling it "steamroller politics." The main issues are the car tax, the increase in state fees, and the negative supplementary budget; the position is strongly results-oriented, accusing the government of breaking promises (income tax exemption for the average pension) and ignoring the will of the people (76% opposition to the car tax). Criticism is also leveled at the Foreign Minister’s conduct in Georgia and the Prime Minister’s potential departure for Europe.
05.2024
44 Speeches
The speaker is in strong opposition, focusing on the government's operational failures (economic recession, the education crisis, and unfulfilled promises). He opposes new taxes (the sugar tax, taxing pensions) and supports social issues (teachers' salaries, pensions) and the preservation of existing electoral rights. His political framework is heavily results-oriented and critical of systemic flaws, highlighting the government's denial of responsibility.
04.2024
30 Speeches
The political stance is strongly oppositional, focusing on the government’s failures and broken promises. Key issues include the increased tax burden (car tax, sugar tax, excise duties) and the failure to uphold social promises, which has resulted in a complete loss of public trust. Criticism is specifically aimed at the government’s cynicism and irresponsible conduct, particularly concerning promised salary increases for teachers and the taxation of pensions.
03.2024
17 Speeches
The main topics are the government's irresponsible tax policy, particularly the opposition to the proposed car tax and other tax hikes, alongside the critical demographic situation. The political focus is heavily directed toward solving social and economic problems, emphasizing the taxation of banks' excess profits and supporting families. The narrative is strongly results-oriented, accusing the government of punishing the populace for the economic downturn and undermining public confidence. The speaker demands that the government start making more popular and responsible decisions.
02.2024
14 Speeches
The political focus is centered on heavily criticizing the government's handling of the economic crisis and the demographic situation. The speaker stresses that the government's tax hikes and cuts to social benefits are the biggest drag on the economy and are pushing the birth rate to a record low. The position is sharply oppositional, offering alternative solutions such as a bank tax and the reduction of the state apparatus. The political framework is primarily policy- and performance-based, focusing on the government's inaction during this critical situation.
01.2024
17 Speeches
The political position is strongly oppositional, focusing on criticizing the government’s actions regarding rushed tax hikes, issues with education reform, and unfair regional policy. The criticism is primarily aimed at the quality and consequences of the government’s work, demanding more meticulous planning and a thorough consideration of the potential repercussions. The speaker stresses that the government’s activities are damaging economic activity, undermining the ability of families to cope financially, and jeopardizing the sustainability of the education system.