By Plenary Sessions: Vadim Belobrovtsev

The political focus is directed toward international agreements and the procedural clarity of lawmaking. The speaker demands concrete answers from those accountable regarding both the current status of the treaties (specifically, the countries with whom agreements are still missing) and the substance of the voluminous draft bill, emphasizing a policy- and procedure-driven approach.

The primary political focus is the welfare of children and families, alongside the demographic situation, which is considered catastrophic. It strongly supports making June 1st a national holiday and a day off to strengthen family ties. It criticizes the government for cutting benefits for large families and for creating procedural hurdles in the handling of opposition-sponsored legislation. The platform is strongly value-based, emphasizing familial care and nurturing.

The central issue is the slow speed and high cost of fixed internet connectivity in Estonia compared to the rest of the European Union. The speaker adopts a fiercely critical position regarding the government's failure to act, demanding faster and more affordable service to ensure Estonia avoids ranking at the bottom of the EU tables. This stance is clearly performance-driven, highlighting the nation's poor track record in infrastructure development.

The politician is positioning himself as a strong advocate for lowering the VAT on groceries, viewing this as the right course of action and a solution both to high prices and to the quality of school meals. He criticizes the government's actions, pointing out that the Reform Party-led government raised the VAT by 4 percentage points, which has led to increased food costs. The political focus is clearly policy- and results-driven (taxation and social welfare).

The political stance is strongly opposed to the government's tax policy, particularly targeting the Reform Party, which they accuse of lying and injustice. The most crucial issues are social justice and the special constitutional protection of vulnerable groups (people with disabilities, large families). The political framework is clearly value-based, stressing the necessity of providing special treatment when it comes to taxation.

The political position centers on sharp criticism directed at the government concerning its wage policy for public sector workers (rescuers, police officers, and teachers). The speaker deems the proposed wage hike of up to 10% insufficient and merely temporary, characterizing it as an election maneuver that fails to guarantee continuity in 2027–2028. He firmly backs the demands of public sector employees for stability and the introduction of a coefficient (1.2) tied to the Estonian average wage. The criticism is primarily aimed at the effectiveness of the government's actions and its lack of a long-term vision.

The political stance is sharply critical of the government's fiscal policy, specifically highlighting the rapid increase in national debt and the absence of a stabilization strategy. Furthermore, social inequality is stressed, with critics questioning what benefit the 900-page budget provides to less-privileged groups, while also pointing out that the rate of pension indexation is falling. The critique is primarily grounded in policy and performance outcomes.

The speaker places a strong emphasis on improving the demographic situation and supporting the financial well-being of families with children. He criticizes the government's proposed tax relief (100 euros) as insufficient, advocating instead for more radical solutions, such as the complete abolition of the car tax for large families. The political framework is value-based, stressing the necessity of taking every possible step to improve the circumstances of families with children.