By Plenary Sessions: Vadim Belobrovtsev

The rhetorical style is formal, respectful, and directly interrogative, using addresses such as "Esteemed Presenter" and "Esteemed Minister." The speaker employs a logical approach, posing short and specific questions aimed at eliciting fact-based answers and distilling complex information.

The style is a mix of emotional appeal (on behalf of children and families) and logical arguments (statistics, economic compensation). The tone is critical of the government, particularly concerning procedural errors (an incompetent representative on the commission), which is deemed "very poor practice." Finally, there is a strong appeal to set aside political confrontation and find consensus.

The style is formal and direct, addressing the minister respectfully, but simultaneously presenting sharp criticism and demanding accountability. The rhetoric is strongly logic-based, relying on data, the recollection of past events, and comparisons, emphasizing the need for state action.

The speaker's style is formal and respectful towards the presenter, but simultaneously critical of the government's policy. He uses rhetorical questions to challenge the government's stance (e.g., are other countries that lowered the tax foolish?). The tone is concerned about the economic situation, emphasizing the logical connections between taxes and social problems.

The rhetorical style is predominantly combative and critical, accusing the opposing side of lies and cynical behavior, even going so far as to use the term "misanthropes." It uses specific data (salary figures, budget expenditures) to back up its logical arguments, but the overall tone is emotionally charged and expresses clear indignation. The discourse is formal, yet it includes sharp personal judgments.

The rhetorical style is critical and forceful, conveying deep skepticism regarding the government's long-term strategy. The text employs both a logical appeal (a 10% increase versus 40% inflation) and an emotional emphasis on the workers' need for security and stability. The speaker uses strong language, labeling the proposed wage hike, against a backdrop of high inflation, as "ridiculously inadequate."

The rhetorical style is analytical, formal, and questioning, directed straight at the minister. It employs logical arguments and relies on specific figures (GDP percentage, indexation rates) and historical comparisons to highlight areas of concern. The tone is serious and concerned, focusing on the lack of budget transparency for the average person.

The style is direct, interrogative, and persistent, focusing on uncovering the background of political decisions. The speaker uses repeated questions to gain clarity on the content of the negotiations and the maximum possible support amount. The tone is critical, especially when they quote another government member (Kristina Kallas) to highlight the government's internal contradictions regarding the budget.