By Plenary Sessions: Vadim Belobrovtsev

The data indicates active participation in the plenary session, where three targeted questions were posed to both the rapporteur and the minister within a short timeframe. This pattern of activity suggests a focus on the question and answer rounds within the legislative process.

This demonstrates a long-term pattern of activity, as he has consistently pursued the idea of designating June 1st as a national holiday since 2020, when he served as the Deputy Mayor of Tallinn. He is an active initiator and defender of the draft bill during the Riigikogu plenary session.

The speaker demonstrates a consistent pattern of action, following up on the same topic (internet connectivity) exactly one year after the previous inquiry. This indicates systematic policy oversight and the demanding of accountability regarding the government's actions.

The speaker was active during the plenary session, posing three questions to the rapporteur in a single day, focusing on tax policy and its social consequences. This demonstrates engagement in the discussion of a specific issue and an effort to obtain clarification and validation for their positions. Data concerning broader patterns of activity is unavailable.

The speaker is active in plenary sessions, appearing on two consecutive days (October 8 and 9) both as a rapporteur for a draft bill and as a questioner. He/She references previous active participation in the Riigikogu support group for large families, which demonstrates a long-term commitment to socio-political issues.

The speaker is actively participating in the Riigikogu's Q&A session, repeatedly raising questions about public sector wages, referencing a previous discussion held on September 22nd. He/She is aware of and closely monitoring upcoming public events, such as the demonstration by rescue workers and teachers in front of the Parliament, and is using this context to sharpen the focus of his/her questions.

The speaker is actively participating in the plenary session during the budget debate, posing successive questions to the Minister regarding both fiscal and social policy. This pattern of activity indicates an opposition role, demanding explanations and strategies from the government.

The speaker is active in plenary sessions, participating in the question period with the minister and submitting repeated and clarifying questions concerning the bill. His/Her pattern of activity demonstrates a focus on the critical analysis of legislative details and political compromises.