By Plenary Sessions: Vadim Belobrovtsev

The political focus is heavily centered on the demographic crisis, which is described as catastrophic and demands immediate intervention. The view is maintained that the government’s actions have generated insecurity among families, particularly concerning the unstable policy surrounding benefits and subsidies. This stance is outcomes-based, highlighting the government’s failure to guarantee stability in demographic policy.

A strong focus on issues of public safety and social justice, particularly regarding the restoration of the Kopli rescue team and improving the salary conditions for frontline workers (police officers, rescuers). The criticism is directed at the government’s administrative decisions and priorities (officials’ salaries versus the rescue station), and it is clearly results-driven. It is emphasized that the money was available, which is why closing the station was fundamentally the wrong choice.

Strong opposition to the government's actions, particularly concerning the president repeatedly sending back a bill deemed unconstitutional and the failure to address the demographic crisis. The political stance primarily focuses on criticizing the government's inefficiency and its rejection of substantive Centre Party proposals (such as family benefits and school meals). The central issue is social policy and family support, which the speaker believes the government has ignored, labeling it "anti-family."

A strong opposition focus on the wage conditions of public sector employees (cultural workers, teachers, and rescuers), emphasizing the negative impact of freezing minimum wage floors and inflation. The opposition criticizes the government for its hostility towards public servants and demands a resolute wage increase, specifying, for example, at least 20% for cultural workers. This political position is strongly performance- and value-based, requiring the state to treat its employees with respect.

The speaker strongly advocates for consumer protection and financial relief for ordinary people, emphasizing the need to abolish interest penalties for the early repayment of home loans. This position is clearly policy- and value-driven, aimed at making people's lives simpler and more affordable. He/She expresses disappointment that the coalition did not support this initiative, which would improve the lives of the public.

The focus is on resolving social and economic crises, particularly the growing deficit of the Health Insurance Fund and integrating young people into the labor market. [The politician/party] represents a strong opposition stance, criticizing the government's inaction and its use of convenience tactics when rejecting bills. The positions are policy- and value-based, emphasizing the need to motivate young people and strengthen family relationships. The politician warns against the Health Insurance Fund's "vicious circle," which could lead the state to bankruptcy.

The most crucial topic is the motor vehicle tax, the complete abolition of which the speaker strongly supports, citing the consistent stance of the Center Party faction. This is a forceful position, focusing on the government's failure to provide clarity and the tax's negative impact on the economy. The speaker demands a concrete answer from the government—whether the car tax will stay or be scrapped—while criticizing the coalition for its confusion.

The political stance is sharply critical of the energy policy pursued by the government and the state-owned enterprise Elering. This policy appears to prioritize the needs of the European common market over the socio-economic effects on Estonia. We demand accountability and the public release of relevant analyses, with a focus on protecting consumer interests and prioritizing the development of the domestic network. The questions raised are aimed at scrutinizing the efficacy of the government's actions and strategic decisions.

The speaker, representing the Centre Party faction, focuses heavily on social issues, demanding salary increases for teachers and other public sector employees, as well as increased benefits for families with children to mitigate the demographic crisis. The political position is sharply oppositional, criticizing the government's actions (tax increases, benefit cuts, the failure of the education agreement) as unsuccessful and eroding public confidence. The criticism is primarily policy- and performance-based, accusing the government of failing to deliver on promises and demonstrating incompetence.