By Plenary Sessions: Vadim Belobrovtsev

Not enough data

Refers to cooperation with their faction (the Center Party faction) when submitting interpellations. Highlights the willingness of the Tallinn City Government (led by the Center Party) to cover half the costs of the Kopli command, demonstrating readiness for local-level cooperation in the interest of public safety. Credits the work of the opposition for highlighting positive news concerning wage increases.

Highlights the Center Party's constructive attempts via amendments, which were voted down by the coalition, and expresses doubt regarding the coalition's readiness for substantive cooperation. It expresses support for similar initiatives by other factions (e.g., the Social Democrats' idea to raise family benefits and the school meal bill), demonstrating a willingness for issue-based cooperation when ideas align. It demands that the government cease its "steamroller" tactics and begin taking the opposition's proposals into consideration.

Refers to collaboration with the faction (the Center Party faction) when submitting interpellations. It relies heavily on the specific proposals from trade unions (TALO, the Estonian Education Personnel Union) and organizations (the Association of Estonian Cities and Municipalities), utilizing them as the basis for its demands.

Cooperation is evident internally within the faction, as the draft bill was initiated by the Centre Party faction. There is a lack of openness to compromise with the coalition, since it is emphasized that the coalition members did not support the proposal, which points to an opposing stance.

Works closely with their faction (the Center Party) and cites support from colleagues (Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart, Heljo Pikhof). Is open to the idea that the social tax concession for young people could be even more ambitious. Notes that coalition members support the draft bills in the corridors, but their opinion changes in the chamber, which points to a lack of cooperation on the part of the coalition.

The speaker is open to cooperating with other opposition parties (EKRE, Isamaa) and even the government when it comes to abolishing the car tax. He offers clear support for the government's corresponding proposal in the Riigikogu, pointing to the potential for achieving broad-based support for eliminating the tax.

The collaborative style is evident in the submission of the inquiry, signed by six members of the Riigikogu, which points to strong cooperation either within a faction or between different parliamentary groups when tackling this specific energy policy topic. Information regarding their willingness to compromise with the government is lacking.

The speaker demonstrates a readiness for broad cooperation within the opposition, having co-initiated a motion of no confidence against Liisa-Ly Pakosta alongside the parliamentary groups of EKRE, Isamaa, and the Social Democratic Party. They are also pragmatic, offering EKRE assistance in presenting their nearly identical draft bill.