By Plenary Sessions: Vadim Belobrovtsev
Total Sessions: 164
Fully Profiled: 164
2025-10-16
XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
The speaker is supportive and appreciative of the presenter, praising their actions and the petition as "a very right thing to do." Their goal is rather to affirm and support the presenter's position regarding the necessity of lowering taxes. There is no information available about seeking a cross-party compromise.
2025-10-08
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The speaker detailed previous unsuccessful collaboration within the support group for large families, noting that the work (conducted alongside a member of Eesti 200) was ultimately shelved. Regarding the current draft legislation aimed at supporting people with disabilities, the speaker urges all colleagues to lend their support, stressing the importance of a shared understanding of social vulnerability.
2025-10-08
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Information Hour
There is not enough data.
2025-10-07
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
Insufficient data.
2025-10-06
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
Insufficient data
2025-09-24
15th Estonian Parliament, 6th sitting, press briefing
Not enough data
2025-09-22
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
Refers to cooperation with their faction (the Center Party faction) when submitting interpellations. Highlights the willingness of the Tallinn City Government (led by the Center Party) to cover half the costs of the Kopli command, demonstrating readiness for local-level cooperation in the interest of public safety. Credits the work of the opposition for highlighting positive news concerning wage increases.
2025-09-17
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting.
Highlights the Center Party's constructive attempts via amendments, which were voted down by the coalition, and expresses doubt regarding the coalition's readiness for substantive cooperation. It expresses support for similar initiatives by other factions (e.g., the Social Democrats' idea to raise family benefits and the school meal bill), demonstrating a willingness for issue-based cooperation when ideas align. It demands that the government cease its "steamroller" tactics and begin taking the opposition's proposals into consideration.
2025-09-15
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting
Refers to collaboration with the faction (the Center Party faction) when submitting interpellations. It relies heavily on the specific proposals from trade unions (TALO, the Estonian Education Personnel Union) and organizations (the Association of Estonian Cities and Municipalities), utilizing them as the basis for its demands.
2025-09-11
15th Riigikogu, 6th plenary sitting
Cooperation is evident internally within the faction, as the draft bill was initiated by the Centre Party faction. There is a lack of openness to compromise with the coalition, since it is emphasized that the coalition members did not support the proposal, which points to an opposing stance.
2025-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
Works closely with their faction (the Center Party) and cites support from colleagues (Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart, Heljo Pikhof). Is open to the idea that the social tax concession for young people could be even more ambitious. Notes that coalition members support the draft bills in the corridors, but their opinion changes in the chamber, which points to a lack of cooperation on the part of the coalition.
2025-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, press briefing
The speaker is open to cooperating with other opposition parties (EKRE, Isamaa) and even the government when it comes to abolishing the car tax. He offers clear support for the government's corresponding proposal in the Riigikogu, pointing to the potential for achieving broad-based support for eliminating the tax.
2025-09-08
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
The collaborative style is evident in the submission of the inquiry, signed by six members of the Riigikogu, which points to strong cooperation either within a faction or between different parliamentary groups when tackling this specific energy policy topic. Information regarding their willingness to compromise with the government is lacking.
2025-09-04
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The speaker demonstrates a readiness for broad cooperation within the opposition, having co-initiated a motion of no confidence against Liisa-Ly Pakosta alongside the parliamentary groups of EKRE, Isamaa, and the Social Democratic Party. They are also pragmatic, offering EKRE assistance in presenting their nearly identical draft bill.
2025-06-19
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2025-06-18
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The cooperation is characterized by openness to stakeholder viewpoints, particularly in the education sector, where the lack of support from local governments and teachers' unions is emphasized. Although the faction is not proposing rejection, it demonstrates a readiness for legislative work, but notes that earlier amendments (submitted by the Centre Party faction) were rejected by the majority.
2025-06-17
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker is acting in opposition, calling on fellow colleagues to oppose the draft bill ("We call on others to do the same"). The style of cooperation is one of confrontation rather than seeking compromise, as the bill is considered fundamentally unacceptable.
2025-06-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Insufficient data.
2025-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The speaker is acting on behalf of the Centre Party faction, presenting amendments intended to bring the draft legislation into constitutional compliance. He/She points to the fact that the President's representative supported the Centre Party's proposals, but observes that the coalition voted them down at the committee level. This demonstrates a readiness to offer solutions, while underscoring the opposing side's unwillingness to compromise.
2025-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing.
Data is unavailable. The speech focuses exclusively on criticizing and opposing the government.
2025-06-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.
The speaker supports this bill and references the positions held by colleague Peeter Ernits, thereby demonstrating the existence of support within the faction. On the topic of school meals, the repeated initiative of the Centre Party faction is emphasized. However, there is no indication of a readiness to compromise with the governing coalition, given that previous attempts were voted down.
2025-06-09
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker refers to the support group for large families formed within the Riigikogu, whose proposals (tax breaks concerning the motor vehicle tax) were rejected by the coalition. The Centre Party’s approach to eliminating kindergarten place fees in Tallinn is highlighted as a positive example, which demonstrates support for gradual and logical policy development. Information is lacking regarding any current cooperation or willingness to compromise with the coalition.
2025-06-04
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker supports cross-party cooperation, citing three similar draft bills that demonstrate widespread recognition of the issue. Emphasis is placed on the unanimous support (six parties) within the Tallinn City Council for the idea of amending the regulation. However, disappointment is simultaneously expressed regarding the representatives of the Social Democratic Party who failed to support the Centre Party's initiative in the committee, despite sharing a common objective.
2025-06-04
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing
Cooperation with the Estonian Education Personnel Union was mentioned in the context of teachers' salary negotiations, supporting the union's proposal to raise the minimum salary to 2,184 euros. The speaker also referenced their political group's repeated legislative initiatives (the school meal bill), which demonstrates an initiative for cooperation at the legislative level, despite the opposition from the coalition.
2025-06-03
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fifth session, plenary session
Not enough data
2025-06-02
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session
Not enough data
2025-05-21
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
The speaker actively advocates for regional cooperation, inquiring of the minister whether it would be prudent to partner with countries like Latvia and Lithuania on the nuclear power plant project. This signals a willingness to pursue solutions through international partnership.
2025-05-20
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Insufficient data
2025-05-19
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
There is no evidence of cooperation suggesting a cross-party or broad-based coalition. The sole reference to a colleague (Lauri Laats) was utilized to support the description of the labor crisis, indicating alignment primarily within their own political faction. There is no information regarding a willingness to compromise.
2025-05-15
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker refers to their faction’s (the Center Party) earlier attempt to contribute to the reform transitioning to Estonian-language education by submitting 50 amendments. These were rejected, and the faction was subsequently accused of sabotage. In the current context, there is a distinct lack of openness to compromise, with oppositional criticism being the dominant force.
2025-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The speaker aligns himself with the position of the President, who refused to promulgate the law, and uses the statements made by the chairmen of the Constitutional Committee and the Legal Affairs Committee to support his arguments. Center Party amendment proposal No. 1, which could have brought the law into compliance with the Constitution, was previously offered, but it was rejected.
2025-05-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
Insufficient Data
2025-05-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.
Not enough data
2025-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Not enough data
2025-05-07
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The speaker emphasizes the necessity of involving all three parties—the employee, the employer, and the state—in the amendment of labor law, and demands that a compromise be found. Any cooperation regarding the current draft bill is being rejected because it is "just water for the employer's mill" and completely lacks compromise. The speaker notes that both the ELVL and the trade unions oppose the draft, indicating a willingness to cooperate specifically with these interest groups.
2025-05-06
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2025-04-24
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker's style is collaborative and dialogue-oriented, addressing the presenter directly to seek clarification. He/She is looking for an opportunity to balance the policy, which indicates an openness to finding solutions and compromises.
2025-04-23
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker detailed the lack of cooperation, pointing out that the coalition refused to debate the amendments proposed by Center Party colleague Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart concerning the Law on Churches. It is stressed that the opposition's proposals are rejected even when the coalition acknowledges that changes are necessary.
2025-04-23
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing
The speaker sees the need for cooperation with the private sector, calling on banks and communication operators to assume greater responsibility and take measures to protect people. Direct inter-party cooperation was not mentioned; instead, attention was directed toward the new minister with the hope that they will fare better than their predecessor.
2025-04-22
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The speaker acknowledged previous effective cooperation between the government and the Riigikogu (e.g., the construction of the ERR building and the renovation of the National Library), but referred to this as a rare positive exception. He also congratulated his colleagues (Madis Kallas, Lauri Laats), thereby demonstrating internal collegiality. Reference was made to the Centre Party's role in financing earlier sports facilities, emphasizing the contribution of their own party.
2025-04-21
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
There isn't enough data.
2025-04-17
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker stresses the consistent effort of their faction (the Estonian Centre Party faction) in bringing this issue to the forefront. Cooperation with the coalition is improbable, although hope for a "miracle" is expressed. Previous collaboration with the Social Democrats is criticized due to their belated support and earlier failures to vote, though the speaker hopes for their support now that they are in opposition.
2025-04-16
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The style of cooperation is open and procedural, involving direct communication with the rapporteur to ensure a correct understanding of the legal situation and the proper application of the legislation. The objective is a shared interpretation of the law.
2025-04-16
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing
The speaker identifies themselves as a representative of the opposition, focusing on criticizing the government and demanding accountability. There is no information regarding cooperation or a willingness to compromise with other political parties or the governing coalition.
2025-04-15
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
Data is scarce.
2025-04-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Data is scarce.
2025-04-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
There is not enough data.
2025-04-09
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker emphasizes cooperation with other opposition factions (Isamaa, EKRE, the Centre Party) regarding the repeal of the car tax. Concerning the Church Law, the speaker represents the Centre Party faction's strong opposition, while also noting the support for their stance from the public and experts (theologians, the commissioner).
2025-04-08
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Demonstrates cooperation within the faction, referencing the Center Party faction's previous stances on the car tax. It expresses clear agreement with the rapporteur when evaluating the government's mistakes, noting that this is truly a massive blunder.
2025-04-07
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Insufficient dataset
2025-03-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker emphasizes that his faction (the Centre Party) is standing alone for the right cause, suggesting that his other colleagues either aren't listening or simply refuse to listen. To validate his position, he relies on respected figures outside of parliament (the President, the Chancellor of Justice), rather than on internal parliamentary coalitions.
2025-03-20
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Insufficient Data
2025-03-17
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The speaker is rigid and confrontational toward the government, noting that the coalition pushed its ideas through and failed to consider the opposition's proposals. However, cooperation with representatives of other factions (e.g., Igor Taro) is mentioned within the Riigikogu support group for large families, where the creation of exemptions for the car tax was discussed.
2025-03-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Insufficient data
2025-02-27
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The approach to cooperation is directed toward intra-party colleagues (a reference to Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart) and opposition activities (such as filing a motion of no confidence). In communication with the coalition, the emphasis is placed on demanding accountability and criticizing the lack of transparency, with no indication of a readiness to compromise.
2025-02-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, press briefing
Insufficient information
2025-02-25
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The style of cooperation focuses on representing the position of its faction (the Centre Party) and aligning its views with the criticism voiced by high state officials and experts (e.g., the President, the Chancellor of Justice, the Estonian Lawyers' Association). The speaker emphasizes that the Centre Party does not divide people based on nationality or citizenship. A willingness to compromise with the initiators of the bill is not mentioned.
2025-02-20
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session.
The speaker supports colleague Tanel Tein’s initiative regarding private sector funding and wishes him success, demonstrating an openness to good ideas. However, the overall style remains strongly partisan, focusing on highlighting the achievements of their own party (the Centre Party) and sharply criticizing the government’s actions.
2025-02-19
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary sitting
The speaker emphasizes the need for compromise and proposes that the parties should return to the negotiating table to find a solution that satisfies all sides. He refers to having heard arguments from various interest groups, including representatives of the church and the Ministry of the Interior.
2025-02-19
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th sitting, information briefing
Not enough data
2025-02-18
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Not enough data
2025-02-17
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker refers to the questions submitted by their faction, which demonstrates the existence of internal cooperation within the faction. There is no evidence of inter-party cooperation or a willingness to compromise; rather, the focus remains on criticizing the government's actions.
2025-02-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary meeting
The speaker notes that the Centre Party opposes the amendment, referring to a shared resistance. He calls on the Social Democrats to heed their authoritative member, Liia Hänni, so that they might change their stance and join the opponents of the amendment. Direct cooperation with other parties is not detailed.
2025-02-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
He speaks highly of his colleague Urmas Reinsalu, supporting Reinsalu's warning to the Prime Minister, which demonstrates cooperation within the opposition. Regarding the legislation, the question is raised as to why the draft bill was submitted on the initiative of two MPs rather than with the support of the entire faction, suggesting a preference for broader, faction-wide cooperation. For one specific initiative, support is expressed for its formal structure, although questions are being posed regarding the actual content.
2025-02-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing
Insufficient data.
2025-02-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The speaker commends Marko Mihkelson, the Chairman of the Foreign Affairs Committee, for his presence and specific answers, demonstrating a willingness to recognize competence regardless of party affiliation. Furthermore, the speaker references the viewpoints of colleagues Lauri Laats and Raimond Kaljulaid, thereby supporting cooperation within the parliamentary group.
2025-02-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The speaker collaborates with opposition colleagues (e.g., Lauri Laats) when presenting legislative initiatives. He demonstrates openness to constructive issues, noting that regarding the social media bill, the committee adopted a consensual and apolitical approach. However, he criticizes the coalition's solidarity, which prevents ministers from being criticized and the right decisions from being made.
2025-01-30
Fifteenth Estonian Parliament, fifth session, plenary session.
It emphasizes the Centre Party's principled and unified opposition to amending the constitution. It refers to support for the views of Constitutional Assembly member Liia Hänni regarding the value of the constitution's permanence. Direct cooperation with other parties in opposing the bill is not described.
2025-01-29
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th sitting, information briefing
The speaker emphasizes that their faction (the Center Party) did not vote for the car tax, thereby distancing themselves from the coalition's decisions. They refer to a support group operating within the Riigikogu that prepared a draft concerning tax exemptions, which demonstrated a willingness to cooperate. However, they stress that the coalition disregarded the fruits of this cooperation.
2025-01-22
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session.
Not enough data.
2025-01-22
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing
The speaker sharply criticizes the Prime Minister for failing to cooperate with coalition partners over the sudden raising of the defense spending issue. Simultaneously, he/she points to cross-parliamentary cooperation on demography, noting that all six factions agree on the complexity of the situation, even if they do not agree on the solutions.
2025-01-20
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Cooperation is taking place among the opposition parties and within the support group for large families, where topics like car tax exemptions were discussed. A lack of cooperation is evident on the coalition's side, as their ideas and proposals were not even brought up for discussion.
2025-01-16
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker demonstrates openness to cooperation, noting as a positive sign the Prime Minister's potential agreement to prioritize a cost-based budget. This gives hope that things are starting to move in the right direction, indicating a readiness to support positive changes regardless of political affiliation.
2025-01-15
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker stresses the opposition's readiness to support the coalition's initiatives (such as micro-qualifications), provided they are sound, and anticipates cooperation among the other opposition parties. At the same time, he criticizes the coalition for its inability to cooperate and its lack of willingness to back the opposition's reasonable proposals. He points to the good personal relationships he maintains with colleagues (for instance, in the basketball support group), even when their political views diverge.
2025-01-15
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing
The speaker primarily operates as a critic but demonstrates a willingness to defend the procedural conduct of other factions (the Social Democrats). Arguments are heavily supported by external legal experts and institutions (the Chancellor of Justice, the Union of Jurists), indicating collaboration with the legal community.
2025-01-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
There is not enough data.
2024-12-19
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The collaborative style stresses the party's internal unity ("The united Centre Party"). There are no references to a readiness for compromise or inter-party cooperation; the focus is purely on oppositional criticism.
2024-12-18
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, press briefing
The collaborative style is demonstrated by quoting a colleague (former Minister of Finance Mart Võrklaev) to support the argument that there was no budgetary necessity for closing the Kopli station. There is no direct indication of openness to compromise with the government; instead, the government is being required to admit and rectify its mistakes.
2024-12-17
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
Insufficient data
2024-12-12
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The speaker is participating in the plenary debate, posing questions to the rapporteur. He/She supports the bill, which is already under parliamentary procedure, aimed at reducing the Riigikogu’s (Estonian Parliament’s) expense allowances, indicating a readiness to back legislation initiated by colleagues. Openness to compromise is not mentioned; rather, a fundamental expansion of government expenditures is being demanded.
2024-12-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
Cooperation is emphasized primarily with local governments and key stakeholders (teachers, parents)—groups that the speaker believes the state has previously ignored. He/She represents the position of the Association of Estonian Cities and Municipalities, which refused to endorse the draft legislation. There is no information available regarding whether a compromise is being sought with the coalition or other parliamentary factions.
2024-12-11
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth session, press briefing.
The speaker is skeptical of the government and asked the minister whether he really needs to remain in a government where nobody listens to him, referencing the rejection of the Social Democratic Party's proposals. This indicates a lack of trust regarding the coalition's ability to cooperate.
2024-12-10
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The speaker highlights the lack of cooperation and expresses deep pessimism about the coalition's readiness to work together. He points out that even highly constructive proposals put forward by the Center Party faction are voted down by the coalition, demonstrating the failure of their joint efforts.
2024-12-09
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting
There is no direct mention of cross-party cooperation; the speaker is clearly operating in an opposition oversight capacity. A single query was submitted by multiple individuals ("we submitted"), suggesting internal collaboration within their political faction. There is no expressed willingness to compromise; instead, the focus remains squarely on exposing the government's failings.
2024-12-04
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
Cooperation is taking place within the faction (the Centre Party cannot support the draft legislation), and reference is made to other opposition colleagues (Lauri Laats). It is important to rely on the representative organization of local governments (ELVL) to strengthen the arguments, which demonstrates a willingness to cooperate with interest groups.
2024-12-04
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, press briefing
The style of cooperation in this context is deficient and confrontational, focusing on highlighting the inefficiency of the opposing party (SDE). It is ironically noted that the Social Democrats require the support of the Center Party (Keskerakond) to defend their own principles. Direct cooperation is not being offered; rather, principled clarity is demanded.
2024-12-02
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
Not enough data
2024-11-20
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The speaker, acting on behalf of the Estonian Centre Party faction, proposes suspending the proceedings of the education bill. He demonstrates collegiality by defending the right of a member of another faction (Heljo Pikhof) to ask a question. Cooperation with the government is lacking; instead, external apolitical authorities (the Chancellor of Justice, Sinisalu) are utilized to delegitimize the proposed legislation.
2024-11-20
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, press briefing.
The speaker is attempting to establish a pragmatic, albeit temporary, point of cooperation with Prime Minister Kristen Michal by citing and endorsing her previous criticism regarding the ministry's operations. This demonstrates a willingness to support the position of the government's top leader when those positions conflict with the administrative decision of a specific ministry.
2024-11-18
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth Session, Plenary Session
The speaker calls for closer cooperation between state institutions (such as the PPA) and private companies (banks and telecom operators) in order to prevent fraud schemes more effectively. He advocates for changing the legislation to place greater responsibility and obligation on financial institutions and communication operators to participate in this fight.
2024-11-13
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.
The speaker emphasizes that the Center Party faction decided to be a constructive force, submitting 16 specific and substantive amendments instead of resorting to obstruction. He expresses disappointment that the coalition voted down all these proposals in the committee, demonstrating that the government has absolutely no desire to cooperate with the opposition.
2024-11-13
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, information briefing
He/She refers to cooperation with colleagues in the hall, noting that "I and some of my colleagues here in the hall asked" specific questions regarding both the security tax and the church. This demonstrates coordinated action within the opposition group. Information regarding cross-party compromise or broad cooperation is lacking.
2024-11-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The speaker emphasized the desire for cross-party compromise on non-political issues. He offered the coalition the opportunity to submit the same bill themselves, promising the support of the opposition, thereby demonstrating a readiness to cooperate for the sake of the outcome. Furthermore, he supports a similar initiative proposed by another opposition party.
2024-11-05
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2024-11-04
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The speaker emphasizes the importance of cooperation and unity, highlighting the unanimous support the draft bill received from the Culture Committee, regardless of the disagreements between the coalition and the opposition. The speaker considers the thorough involvement of interest groups (such as the Association of Estonian Cities and Municipalities and the Paralympic Committee) and the resolution of their concerns to be exemplary, viewing the ministry as an equal partner.
2024-10-23
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2024-10-23
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, information briefing
The speaker represents the views of the Centre Party faction and refers to earlier cooperation with the Reform Party, which secured the income tax exemption for the average pension. In the current context, there is absolutely no reference to cooperation; a strong oppositional stance prevails regarding the government's policy.
2024-10-22
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
There is too little data.
2024-10-21
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
There is too little data.
2024-10-16
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The speaker referenced cooperation with colleagues from their faction (Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart) in submitting the draft bill concerning budget transparency. There is no data indicating openness to compromises or collaboration with the ruling parties.
2024-10-16
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, press briefing
The speaker demands that the minister cooperate with their cabinet colleagues to discuss and increase police resources and salaries. There is no information regarding inter-party cooperation or a willingness to compromise.
2024-10-14
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
There is not enough data.
2024-10-09
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, information briefing
There is no direct data regarding the style of cooperation, but the speaker emphasizes disagreements on foreign policy issues between government members and party colleagues (Marko Mihkelson, Eerik-Niiles Kross). This is done with the aim of exposing the government's internal crisis of confidence, not to seek cooperation.
2024-10-07
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
The speaker expresses willingness to cooperate with the new minister, provided that the minister takes the problem with "full seriousness" and takes concrete steps. As a solution, he proposes convening the heads of the major operator companies so that a solution can be found jointly under the state's initiative. The goal of this cooperation is to ease the burden on the end consumer's wallet.
2024-09-25
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
The style of cooperation is emphatically a failure, as the speaker highlights the coalition's consistent refusal to support the opposition's constructive proposals. The speaker considers the coalition incapable of cooperation, given that they won't back even those ideas they praise verbally.
2024-09-25
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, press briefing
There is not enough data.
2024-09-23
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
The speaker emphasizes the intra-factional unity (of the Centre Party faction) in opposing the closure of the Consulate General, noting that this unity existed previously as well. The style of cooperation is rather consensual, assuming that the proposal to restore the New York representation should enjoy widespread support, given that the USA is Estonia’s biggest ally.
2024-09-19
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The speaker criticizes the coalition's inability to cooperate, which stems from a political culture where opposition proposals are automatically rejected. At the same time, he expresses openness to compromises on the specifics of the draft legislation—for example, adjusting the amount of child benefits or school lunch support—provided the bill is advanced to the second reading.
2024-09-17
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2024-09-16
The 15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting.
The style of interaction is formal and respectful towards the minister, beginning with an acknowledgment of his lengthy presentation. Direct cooperation or a willingness to compromise is not expressed; instead, a pointed political question is raised concerning the government's actions.
2024-09-11
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
The style of cooperation is dialogue-oriented, seeking common ground with the Minister regarding the strategy's key points and initiating the address based on the assumption that the Minister is in agreement. The speaker references previous communication, which demonstrates a readiness for a long-term discussion.
2024-09-11
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, press briefing.
Insufficient data.
2024-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting
The speaker emphasizes the necessity of cross-party cooperation, describing the draft bill as apolitical and referencing unofficial support received from other factions. He is open to debating colleagues' more radical suggestions (such as a four-day work week) and concurs with colleague Lauri Laats concerning the limited capacity of Riigikogu members to commission analyses.
2024-09-09
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The speaker emphasizes the previous cooperation among the opposition parties (Center Party, EKRE, and Isamaa) in submitting and voting for the motion of no confidence back in April. There is no information available regarding any search for compromises with the government; instead, sharp criticism is being leveled against the minister for their inaction.
2024-07-29
15th Riigikogu, Riigikogu extraordinary session.
There is no information regarding a willingness to cooperate or compromise. The speaker adopts a purely oppositional and critical stance, calling the government’s actions into question.
2024-07-29
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The cooperation is clearly intra-factional (evidenced by the Center Party’s 63 substantive amendments and the commissioning of legal analysis) and opposition-based, with specific mention of proposals submitted by other opposition parties. No willingness to compromise with the coalition is expressed; instead, the demand is that the coalition must take the substantive proposals into account.
2024-07-22
15th Riigikogu, Riigikogu's extraordinary session.
No data available.
2024-07-15
15th Riigikogu, Extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The speaker emphasizes cooperation among the opposition forces, especially highlighting the contribution of the Centre Party faction (over 160 amendments), and notes that "all opposition parties" oppose the car tax. There is no mention of openness to compromises or cooperation with the coalition.
2024-06-12
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, information briefing
There is not enough data.
2024-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
The speaker demonstrates a willingness to cooperate and a commitment to seeking consensus, referencing and agreeing with the previous speaker's position on the importance of friendly relations between Estonia and Georgia.
2024-06-10
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
There is no data regarding cooperation or willingness to compromise, as the sessions are structured purely as direct opposition scrutiny and questioning of the government.
2024-06-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The speaker works closely on behalf of the Centre Party faction, presenting both speeches and procedural motions on the faction's behalf. Previous cooperation is mentioned within the support group for large families with a member of the coalition party (Eesti 200), but it is stressed that this cooperation failed because the coalition voted down all exceptions. No willingness to compromise with the coalition is apparent.
2024-06-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
Insufficient data.
2024-06-03
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary sitting.
Insufficient data
2024-05-29
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The speaker referenced a constructive discussion in the committee regarding sports, which demonstrates a willingness for substantive cooperation in solving specific problems. He is cooperating with his faction colleagues (specifically mentioning Kovalenko-Kõlvart) and addresses other colleagues respectfully, even though he remains critical of the government.
2024-05-29
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, information briefing
Reference is made to the joint stance of the Center Party faction in supporting progressive taxation. The support of the Social Democrats, analysts, and even the former chairman of the Reform Party for maintaining the tax hump is also noted, suggesting the possibility of an intra-governmental agreement. The style of cooperation is proposal-driven and seeks broad-based support for the fiscal policy changes.
2024-05-28
15th Riigikogu, third session, plenary session
The speaker is actively seeking cooperation and compromise with coalition partners, primarily the Social Democrats and Eesti 200. Repeated appeals are being made to them to convince the Reform Party to postpone the abolition of the tax hump, which would save half a billion euros. This demonstrates an openness to leveraging internal coalition disagreements for the sake of a common goal (protecting pensioners).
2024-05-27
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary session
The speaker emphasizes the unified opposition of the social partners (employers, trade unions) to the government's plan, thereby indicating the lack of broad-based consensus. Cooperation is being sought with the Minister of Social Affairs, who is viewed in a certain sense as a victim, in order to find common resistance to the plan proposed by the Minister of Economic Affairs.
2024-05-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, press briefing
Not enough data.
2024-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The speaker referenced the continuation of a topic raised by a colleague (Urmas Kruuse), indicating a connection to the ongoing internal parliamentary debate and the elaboration of issues previously brought up by others. There is no information available regarding the willingness to cooperate or compromise with the government.
2024-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session.
The speaker represents the views of the Centre Party faction and refers to the debates held in the committee. There is no indication of a willingness to cooperate with the opposing side or seek compromises; rather, a proposal is made to reject the controversial bill at the first reading.
2024-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
There is not enough data on the collaboration style.
2024-05-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The speaker demonstrates a willingness to compromise on the issue of the Estonia theatre's extension, stressing the necessity for all parties (the Estonia Society, the City of Tallinn, and the Government) to sit down together at the negotiating table. He/She supports the draft bill for teachers' salary increases, although criticizing its substance and timing, while citing the faction's overall support.
2024-05-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
The cooperation is evident among the opposition parties, who are jointly supporting the motion of no confidence, despite their differing ideologies. There is no sign of a willingness to compromise with the minister, as the focus remains on emphasizing his failures and demanding accountability.
2024-05-02
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Cooperation is demonstrated with other opposition colleagues by posing similar questions, specifically referencing the question raised by colleague Varro Vooglaid. Reference is also made to the willingness of representatives of the Orthodox Church of the Moscow Patriarchate to compromise and sit down at a common table, which suggests an openness to finding solutions outside the Riigikogu chamber.
2024-04-30
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session.
Cooperation is evident within the faction, as the speaker is acting on behalf of the Center Party faction, requesting a procedural recess. There is no information regarding open cooperation or willingness to compromise with the coalition or other factions.
2024-04-29
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
There is no indication whatsoever of cooperation or willingness to compromise; the speech is aimed at challenging the government's policy and demanding alternatives.
2024-04-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The speaker represents the views of the Centre Party faction and works in cooperation with their fellow faction members, citing the faction's collective decision not to support the draft legislation. There is no evidence of a willingness to compromise with the coalition regarding either the bill under discussion or matters of parliamentary procedure.
2024-04-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, information briefing
A collaborative style is absent, given that these are critical questions directed at the minister. However, the speaker capitalizes on internal disagreements within the ruling party, citing the views of Marko Mihkelson and Urmas Paet as a more rational alternative to Kaja Kallas’s approach.
2024-04-16
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Demonstrates cooperation with colleagues (e.g., Lauri Laats) in raising similar topics, referencing the indoor football arena initiative. Acknowledges the City of Tallinn's role in supporting sports organizations after the state terminated funding, thereby emphasizing the importance of local municipalities.
2024-04-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The collaborative style demonstrates engagement with colleagues, referring to the continuation of a question posed to the good colleague Anastasia, which suggests the existence of shared topic development. Data is missing regarding openness to compromises or cross-party cooperation.
2024-04-03
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The style of cooperation is cautious; the draft bill is supported by the Centre Party faction in the interests of teachers, but this does not imply cooperation with the government, whose actions are deemed ridiculous. There is no openness to compromises, as the focus is on blaming the government and demanding that teachers be valued.
2024-04-03
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The speaker, acting on behalf of the Centre Faction, expresses support for the work carried out by the Social Democrat minister in the areas of Estonian security and integration. This indicates a selectively positive stance regarding the actions of specific ministers. Concurrently, the Social Democratic Party is being asked to take a clear position on the proposed voting rights bill and constitutional amendments.
2024-04-01
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Regarding cooperation, there is no information available concerning cross-party collaboration; instead, attention is drawn to internal coalition tensions, relaying the Prime Minister's alleged thoughts about coalition partners seeking political gain. Openness to compromise is not mentioned; rather, the focus is placed on condemning the government's actions.
2024-03-20
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, press briefing.
Information regarding a willingness to cooperate is unavailable, as the speech focuses on sharp criticism and confrontation of government policy. The speaker proposes scrapping the car tax and instead discussing a defense tax, if that seems like a fairer solution for covering the budget deficit.
2024-03-19
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
There is not enough data.
2024-03-13
15th Estonian Parliament, third sitting, information briefing
Data is scarce.
2024-03-11
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
No data available
2024-03-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, press briefing
Not enough data
2024-03-05
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
There are no direct references regarding the collaborative style, but the speaker refers to the survey conducted by the Estonian Education Workers' Union and the concerns of parents of children with special educational needs, demonstrating solidarity with interest groups and trade unions. The necessity of negotiations to prevent a teachers' strike is also mentioned.
2024-03-04
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The style of cooperation is pragmatic and conditional: the speaker stresses that regarding the bank tax bill, the opposition (including the Centre Faction and the other two factions) would definitely vote in favor, ensuring no obstruction occurs. This demonstrates a willingness for cross-coalition cooperation on popular measures that generate revenue for the state budget. The objective of this cooperation would be the swift adoption of the bill before Midsummer’s Day.
2024-02-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The speaker emphasizes the role of opposition parties in society in initiating discussions and proposing solutions during a difficult time for the country. Economic experts Sirje Potisepp and Peeter Raudsepp are thanked and acknowledged for their substantive presentations in the debate. Cooperation with the coalition is not discussed; instead, the lack of a unified approach among the three coalition parties is highlighted.
2024-02-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The style of cooperation involves referencing the alternative proposed by the Centre Party (the bank tax), which suggests internal party solutions. Furthermore, cooperation with civil society is stressed, bringing attention to the concerns and demands of the Estonian Association of Large Families.
2024-02-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
Insufficient data.
2024-02-13
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The collaborative style is aimed at the government, requesting concrete steps and actions from the minister on the part of the Estonian state to improve the security situation. This is a dialogue-based approach that seeks solutions through the executive branch.
2024-02-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting.
The speaker collaborates with colleagues in their faction on formulating questions and positions. He/She demonstrates a readiness to support the Ministry of Education's stance if it aligns with the principle of equality regarding the pool of borrowers, preferring this over the version proposed by the committee.
2024-02-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
Not enough data.
2024-01-24
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
Not enough data.
2024-01-23
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Not enough data
2024-01-18
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The speaker strongly emphasizes the urgent need for cooperation between the state and local governments to ensure the sustainability of rural schools. Furthermore, there is support for involving experts in making crucial decisions and adopting an individual approach to each school, signaling a readiness for collaboration across various levels.
2024-01-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The speaker emphasizes a previous attempt to contribute substantively, having submitted over 50 amendments in 2022 that would have prevented problems and aligned the draft bill with real life. In the current situation, the focus is on the coalition's inability to cooperate and its desire to avoid hearing about potential issues.
2024-01-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
Insufficient data.
2024-01-10
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
No data available
2024-01-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
The cooperative style refers to teamwork when drafting the inquiries ('we drafted'). Direct collaboration with the government is not mentioned, but the minister is advised to review the existing law and adopt a more flexible approach, particularly in supporting children with special educational needs.