By Plenary Sessions: Vadim Belobrovtsev

The political focus centers on the critical condition of the Estonian economy and the sharp criticism directed at the government's inaction, highlighting that the recession has now persisted for a third year. This stance is vehemently opposed to the government's policy of raising taxes (VAT, excise duties, car tax) and stresses the necessity of dropping the plan to abolish the tax hump while simultaneously introducing a bank tax. The overall approach is primarily policy- and performance-based, leveling accusations against the government for stifling economic growth and lacking any clear vision.

The most salient issue is the strong opposition to the proposed motor vehicle tax, for which the Centre Party is offering a bank tax as an alternative. The political stance is performance-based, criticizing the government's inability to find better solutions for covering national defense expenditures and accusing the Prime Minister of lying. Furthermore, the planned increases to existing taxes (VAT, income tax, and excises) are also being criticized.

The political stance centers on the wage policy for critical public sector employees (police officers, rescuers, border guards), demanding a fair pay raise for them. The speaker criticizes the government’s decision to deny PPA (Police and Border Guard Board) employees a pay increase and highlights the internal government rift concerning the duration of the wage freeze. This position is heavily focused on criticizing the government's actions and is primarily performance- and policy-driven.

The political position heavily focuses on security and defense policy, driven by foreign policy uncertainty. The speaker raises the issue of Europe needing to develop its own defense capabilities, given the potential uncertainty of the US commitment to defending NATO, referencing Donald Trump's statements. This is a policy and values-based framework that emphasizes self-assurance during an international crisis.

The politician strongly supports measures aimed at increasing the birth rate, deeming it a critical issue due to historically low levels. However, he/she opposes the specific student loan bill because it is riddled with inaccuracies and violates the principle of equality concerning the scope of loan recipients and the cancellation of loans in the case of twins. His/Her stance is policy-driven, emphasizing the quality and fairness of implementation.

The political focus centers on opposing the introduction of paid public transport on county lines, a measure deemed unfair and economically detrimental to rural residents. The stance is fiercely confrontational, accusing the government of pursuing policies typical of the Reform Party—specifically, those that eliminate free transport. The policy is framed around its outcome, emphasizing the negative impact on citizens’ finances.