By Months: Lauri Laats

Total Months: 19

Fully Profiled: 19

10.2025

39 Speeches

The speaker is acting on behalf of the Centre Party faction, submitting an interpellation to the Minister of Infrastructure on their behalf. He/She refers to the earlier contradictory positions of the coalition partners (the Social Democrats and Eesti 200) regarding the car tax. Direct cooperation with other factions is not mentioned, but alternative tax policy solutions are proposed, which could be broad-based.
09.2025

160 Speeches

Although the speaker emphasizes the need for open dialogue and cooperation regarding criticisms of the coalition, the speeches also reveal a strong degree of antagonism and opposition toward the coalition itself. A desire has been noted to involve other factions and adopt bills presented collaboratively, but it is simultaneously stressed that compromises must be found, and certain proposals are simply untenable; the coalition's hidden conditions will not be accepted.
06.2025

83 Speeches

The stance is relatively weak and critical towards the coalition, yet on certain issues, there is potential for bipartisan cooperation (for instance, indications of collaboration regarding specific tax amendments or social policy matters). Friendly cooperation may not be explicitly featured in the broader agenda; instead, specific questions and demands are raised, and coalition members are invited to deliberate or jointly oppose certain pieces of legislation.
05.2025

82 Speeches

It expresses a degree of willingness to cooperate (for example, reassessing ENMAK together with the coalition) and stresses the need for broad-based debate and inclusion. However, it simultaneously sets boundaries and requires attention to the interests of the electorate. Broad consultations will be utilized, and the entity is prepared to involve partners in formulating upcoming decisions.
04.2025

90 Speeches

Expresses readiness for cooperation and consensus, emphasizing the need for a unified, partially bipolar discussion and the establishment of a cross-party commission to investigate the security of e-elections; it seeks to involve all parties and experts.
03.2025

17 Speeches

Despite the strong criticism, a desire for consensus and cooperation is evident: it is recommended that they sit down with the political parties, discuss the issues, and find common ground for discussion and an amendment to the draft bill. It has been emphasized that a broader consensus is necessary before taking further steps, and this desire is being channeled through an extraordinary roundtable or joint discussions. At the same time, the attitude toward cooperation is nuanced, as the lack of consensus is being blamed for delaying the changes.
02.2025

67 Speeches

Although the text is primarily oppositional, it still demonstrates some public willingness to cooperate: it calls for broader discussion, the formation of commissions, and the development of multi-party dialogue. The tone occasionally shifts toward seeking compromise, evidenced by an interest in revitalizing regional development and the revenues and services of local governments. However, it remains critical and decisive when cooperation is lacking.
01.2025

66 Speeches

It seeks sensible cooperation and a cross-party approach; for example, regarding hospital projects, the necessity of "cross-party" collaboration is emphasized. At the same time, there is a desire to see a wider, continuous discussion and proposals for improvement. While critical, there are sometimes calls for compromise, and a broader, mutually beneficial solution is sought (e.g., regarding energy policy and state budget transparency).
12.2024

105 Speeches

Shows readiness for cooperation and the discussion of opinions, but this is primarily directed against the coalition; it offers amendment proposals and demonstrates cooperation with non-coalition factions during the second reading; it emphasizes the need to include "all good ideas" (e.g., discussion of the bank tax, transparency of expense compensations, linking the Parliament's work contribution to salary). It highlights the necessity of fruitful debate and the involvement of all parties.
11.2024

114 Speeches

Cooperation and cross-coalition dialogue are deemed fundamental. The speaker emphasizes the necessity of cooperation transcending the coalition and opposition regarding regional policy and the Rail Baltic issue, and calls for a joint investigative committee at the Riigikogu (Parliament) level; he/she seeks coordinated steps with the Baltic states and a multi-party approach. Furthermore, he/she advocates for consensus-based and transparent lawmaking, drawing attention to the need to involve all parliamentary factions.
10.2024

72 Speeches

They demonstrate a willingness to cooperate, work across the coalition, and involve other parliamentary groups (for example, the bank tax proposal has garnered support from several factions). However, they simultaneously stress the need for urgent and transparent discussions and for solutions developed collaboratively, and they also invite others to join in through parliamentary inquiries.
09.2024

45 Speeches

It highlights the necessity of cooperation and inclusion (involvement of stakeholders, participation of the Circular Economy Association), but simultaneously demonstrates strong criticism and a readiness to withdraw from the coalition agreement if essential demands are not met. It shows a willingness to find solutions through broad dialogue and discussion, but it does not commit to achieving broad consensus before specific changes are implemented.
07.2024

4 Speeches

The focus is on internalism and the coherence of the faction's positions: proposed amendments and a legal analysis have been submitted for the coalition to review. [It] demonstrates a readiness to discuss and continue submitting proposals, but there is no explicit indication of direct, broad-based bipartisan cooperation.
06.2024

45 Speeches

The official spokesperson stresses the importance of cooperation and multi-level engagement: diplomats, ministry experts, and allies are invited to participate. He/she calls for broad discussion and a period of reflection for colleagues before decisions are adopted. There is a clear willingness to cooperate and to constructively address those whose ideas or positions diverge.
05.2024

46 Speeches

The opposition, adopting an inclusive tone, emphasizes the necessity of cooperation—not only with Riigikogu factions but also with the European Union and its allies. They prefer solutions based on a cooperative approach (such as a temporary bank tax presented as solidarity), are ready to discuss the Council of Elders and communication plans, and stress the importance of ensuring transparency and collaboration within the committees.
04.2024

18 Speeches

Style of cooperation: strongly anti-coalition, but simultaneously respects colleagues and acknowledges their role; emphasizes procedural correctness and the protection of opposition rights, referring to colleagues as “good colleague.” At the same time, they are prepared to offer alternatives and seek cooperation instead of focusing on funding. Uses examples and cooperative mechanisms, but primarily directs criticism against the government.
03.2024

16 Speeches

Demonstrates a willingness to consider various proposals (including a bank tax and retaining the current income tax structure, but opposing the car tax); stresses the necessity of listening to colleagues and experts in related discussions and continuing the debate in various formats; indicates a degree of coalition and bipartisan approach when seeking solutions.
02.2024

10 Speeches

Regarding cooperation within the context, it is noticeable: it refers to the coalition's decisions and is critical of their policies; it submits proposals in the form of draft legislation and parliamentary interpellations, but lacks a direct emphasis on the division of collaborative work. It functions strongly as an opposition, but shows a willingness to debate and refers to existing coalition lines either negatively or with a view toward improvement.
01.2024

6 Speeches

I value cooperation and broad-based inclusion: this involves the engagement of local governments, communities, and local and international experts in a broader discussion on nuclear energy and energy policy. It emphasizes bipartisanship or a broad-based approach (coalition negotiations) and demonstrates a readiness to cooperate with multiple stakeholders.